AI Can’t Capture the Sound of Orgasms: The Growing Demand for Voice Actors Amidst Robot Narrators in Audiobooks

The reasons audiobooks resonate are deeply human. They evoke moments that catch in the throat or a genuine smile when a word is spoken.

Melbourne actor and audiobook narrator Annabelle Tudor refers to narration as a storyteller’s innate ability, a fundamental and priceless skill. “The voice easily reveals our true feelings,” she explains.

However, this art form might be facing challenges.

In May, Audible, the audiobook service under Amazon, revealed plans to enable authors and publishers to narrate in English, Spanish, French, and Italian, using over 100 voices generated by artificial intelligence.

With a dwindling number of audiobook companies, emerging talents like Tudor are increasingly reliant on these opportunities, sparking concerns regarding job security, transparency, and overall quality.

Having narrated 48 books, Tudor is uncertain whether AI can replicate her work, yet fears that a dip in quality may alienate listeners.

“I once narrated a particularly explicit scene. The AI lacks understanding of how an orgasm sounds,” she remarks. “I’m curious to know how they plan to address such nuances, including more delicate scenes like childbirth.”

Audiobook Giant Audible claims it aims to use AI to enhance human narration rather than replace it. Photo: M4OS Photo/Aramie

The Audiobook Boom

A 2024 report from Nielseniq Bookdata indicates that over half of Australian audiobook consumers have increased their listening in the last five years. On an international scale, US audiobook sales have risen by 13% from 2023 to 2024. Meanwhile, the UK has seen audiobook revenues soar to £268 million, marking a 31% increase in 2023, as reported by the Publishers Association.

As demand for audio content surges, companies are seeking quicker and cheaper production methods. In January 2023, Apple unveiled a new catalog featuring AI-narrated audiobooks. Later that year, Amazon introduced a feature allowing self-published authors to convert their Kindle ebooks into audiobooks using “virtual audio” technology, resulting in tens of thousands of Audible titles now available in AI-generated formats.

Additionally, in February, Spotify announced support for AI audiobooks, making it easier for authors to reach wider audiences. Audible claims its goal is not to supersede human narrators but to enable more authors and titles to connect with larger audiences. In the US, Audible is testing audio replicas of audiobook narrators to create a unique voice, enhancing their capacity to produce high-quality audiobooks.

“In 2023 and 2024, Audible Studios has hired more [human narrators],” a spokesperson shared with the Guardian. “We continually engage with creators eager to have their work available in audio format and reach new audiences across languages.”

Yet, robot narrators remain a more economical choice than human talent, raising fears among industry professionals about potential job threats.

Volume vs. Quality?

Australian bestselling crime author Chris Hammer helped narrator Doge Swallow launch his career, highlighting a belief that AI narration is a tool designed by people who fail to grasp the intricacies, techniques, and skills necessary for quality audiobook production.

“Some assume we just press a button for a similar or sufficient quality result,” he notes.

Simon Kennedy, president of the Australian Audio Actors Association, mentions a long-standing struggle in Australia about fair remuneration for narrators. Recording an audiobook can mean narrators spend up to three times the length of the finished product for recording, not counting the initial read to understand the narrative and characters.

Skip past newsletter promotions

“In my view, AI narrators prioritize volume over quality and aim to cut costs,” he asserts.

In 2024, Kennedy founded the Australian Voice Subject Association in response to AI’s looming threat. In a submission to a parliamentary committee last year, the organization warned that 5,000 Australian voice acting jobs were at stake.

While not surprised by Audible’s recent announcement, he dismisses it as a “foolish decision.”

“Audiobook narrators hold a truly special and intimate connection with their listeners; pursuing an approach that lacks this connection is misguided,” he suggests.

Regarding voice cloning opportunities, he states that voice actors should be involved in the process, but warns that it may lead to a homogenized robotic voice that listeners quickly tire of.

“If a monotonous, emotionless narration suffices for ‘high quality,’ then perhaps,” he counters. “However, if you seek an evocative, captivating listening experience, don’t expect to find it there.”

Another pressing concern is the absence of AI regulations within Australia. The EU has its own AI ACT, while China and Spain also have measures in place, whereas Australia lacks regulations regarding the labeling of AI-produced content.

“No laws exist to prevent data scraping, voice cloning, or breeding deeper AI capabilities,” Kennedy explains. “There’s no labeling or transparency requirement for AI-generated material or its origins, nor any regulations governing the proper use of AI-generated deepfakes, audio clones, or text.”

Author Hannah Kent expresses concern that AI will “devalue creativity” in the arts. Photo: Carrie Jones/Guardian

This year, during the burial ceremony and dedication of her work, Author: Hannah Kent dropped with astonishment upon discovering that pirated copies of her work had trained meta AI systems. Despite initial resistance and frustration towards AI’s infiltration in creative spaces, she shows curiosity about Audible’s AI developments and the prospective trials for translating texts into various languages.

“It’s evident that the primary motive behind AI adoption is cost-efficiency. Its aim is to reduce artistic value and creative narratives,” Kent reflects.

Both Tudor and Swallow agree that large corporations struggle to fully substitute human narration, as many Australian authors express opposition.

Yet, it remains unclear whether audiences can discern the difference.

“We are rushing straight into a dystopia,” Tudor warns. “Will I listen to humans or robots?”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Bisexual women anticipate achieving orgasms more frequently with women than with men

Women, especially straight men, report that they are less likely to reach orgasm during sex than straight men, a phenomenon known as the “orgasm gap.”

Zoonar GmbH / Alamy

Bisexual women expect to be more likely to orgasm when they have sex with another woman than when they have sex with a man, a study found.

Orgasm is usually a strong indicator of sexual satisfaction and often reflects satisfaction within a relationship. In a study of more than 52,000 adults in the United States, david frederick Chapman University in California and his colleagues. 95% of straight men say they usually always reach orgasm during sexcompared to 65 percent of straight women.

This difference is often referred to as the “orgasm gap,” and research suggests it almost completely disappears. Masturbating or By acts such as stimulation of the clitoris. In Chapman and his team's study, 86% of lesbian women and 66% of bisexual women said they usually always orgasm during sex.

If you would like to learn more about the orgasm gap, Grace Wetzel Researchers at Rutgers University in New Jersey asked 481 non-transgender bisexual women to imagine themselves in hypothetical sexual scenarios. About half were asked to imagine themselves with a man, and the other half were asked to imagine themselves with a woman.

Participants were asked to rate their expectations for orgasm on a scale of 1 to 7, with 1 indicating that they thought orgasm was very unlikely and 7 indicating that they thought it was very likely. The average score when imagining sex with a man was 4.88, compared to 5.86 when imagining sex with a woman. Although this may seem like a relatively small difference, statistical analysis suggests that the results are not due to chance.

In another part of the study, researchers asked an additional 476 women to complete an online survey about their sexual experiences with recent or current partners. There were no transgender women. Just under 60 percent of them were heterosexual, and the rest were lesbian.

Lesbian women had an orgasm 78 percent of the time, compared to 65 percent of straight women. They also reported having higher orgasm expectations before sexual encounters, more actively trying to reach climax during sex, and receiving more clitoral stimulation.

“Research shows that clitoral stimulation is the key to female orgasm,” says Wetzel. “So women have more orgasms when they're with other women because it involves more frequent clitoral stimulation.”

The study found that women who have sex with women expect more clitoral stimulation. “The dominant heterosexual script focuses on penetration rather than clitoral stimulation, which leaves fewer opportunities for female orgasm,” says Wetzel.

But “sexual scripts can be malleable,” she says. “Heterosexual couples can reduce the orgasm gap in their relationships by prioritizing the sexual activities that the woman needs to reach orgasm.”

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com