Physicists Reject the Existence of Sterile Neutrinos

Researchers within the MicroBooNE (Micro Booster Neutrino) collaboration have determined, with 95% probability, that a single sterile neutrino does not exist.

Utilizing data from the MicroBooNE detector, physicists announce one of the preliminary searches for sterile neutrinos with two accelerator neutrino beams. Image credit: Gemini AI.

Neutrinos are tiny subatomic particles that seldom interact with matter, allowing them to traverse the Earth without being impeded.

Current particle physics theory recognizes three types of neutrinos: electron, muon, and tau neutrinos.

These neutrinos can transform from one type to another, a phenomenon known as oscillation.

Previous experiments had revealed neutrinos that seemed to oscillate in ways not consistent with the standard model.

To clarify this anomaly, scientists suggested a fourth type: sterile neutrinos, which interact only through gravity, complicating their detection.

“The existence of three distinct flavors of neutrinos is a fundamental aspect of the Standard Model of particle physics,” explained Dr. Andrew Mastbaum, a physicist from Rutgers University and a member of the MicroBooNE leadership team.

“Because of quantum mechanical interference, neutrinos of one flavor can eventually be detected as a different flavor, a phenomenon known as neutrino oscillation.”

“Numerous unusual findings that challenge the three-flavor model have led us to postulate the existence of an additional neutrino state, referred to as a ‘sterile’ neutrino, which does not directly interact with matter.”

In the experiment conducted by MicroBooNE, physicists investigated neutrinos from two distinct beams and analyzed their oscillations.

After a decade of data gathering and scrutiny, they uncovered no evidence of sterile neutrinos, effectively rejecting one of the leading theories for the peculiarities observed in neutrino behavior.

“This result signifies a pivotal moment,” remarked Dr. Mastbaum.

“It will ignite innovative ideas in neutrino research, helping us to better comprehend the underlying phenomena.”

“While we can rule out major possibilities, this alone does not unravel the entire mystery.”

“The Standard Model does not encompass everything, such as dark matter, dark energy, and gravity, prompting scientists to seek clues that extend beyond the model,” he observed.

“By dismissing one potential explanation, we can concentrate on alternative hypotheses that may yield significant advancements in our understanding of the universe.”

The findings will also provide valuable insights for forthcoming experiments, like the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment (DUNE).

“Through meticulous modeling and a strategic analytical approach, the MicroBooNE team has extracted an extraordinary amount of information from this detector,” stated Dr. Mastbaum.

“In next-generation projects like DUNE, we are already utilizing these techniques to explore even more fundamental questions about the essence of matter and the nature of the universe.”

of the team results published in the journal Nature.

_____

Collaboration with MicroBooNE. 2025. Search for photosterile neutrinos using two neutrino beams with MicroBooNE. Nature 648, 64-69; doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09757-7

Source: www.sci.news

Judges reject initial attempt to halt commercial shift without masks, but schedule autumn trials for AI.

A United States judge denied a request for a preliminary injunction on Tuesday to halt the transition to an open commercial model, but agreed to hear the case this autumn.

Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, a US District Judge in Oakland, California, stated that the tech billionaire did not meet the “high burden necessary for a temporary injunction” to stop the conversion to openness.

Nevertheless, Rogers expressed the importance of quickly resolving the lawsuit, considering “the potential for crisis and harm if conversion takes place unlawfully.”

Elon Musk and Openai, co-founded as a nonprofit in 2015 but left before it gained momentum, have been embroiled in a year-long legal dispute. CEOs of Tesla and X (formerly Twitter) have accused Openai of deviating from its original goal of developing artificial intelligence for the betterment of humanity, rather than corporate profits.

Openai and its CEO, Sam Altman, have denied these allegations. The lawsuit revolves around the shift to a for-profit model for chat developers, with Altman citing the need for more capital and competitiveness in the costly AI industry.

Openai welcomed the judge’s ruling, stating that Musk’s lawsuit, who launched rival startup Xai in 2023, was always about competition. Microsoft, the primary supporter of Openai, did not provide a comment.

Musk’s lawyer, Marc Toberoff, commended the judge for promising a swift trial on the core claims of the case. Toberoff emphasized the importance of ensuring Altman utilizes Musk’s charitable contributions for the benefit of the masses, not personal gain.

The ruling comes after Altman rejected a $97.4 million acquisition offer from a consortium led by Musk, claiming Openai is not for sale and accusing Musk of attempting to hinder its competitors.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Softbank Group is reportedly discussing leading a funding round of up to $400 million for Openai, valuing the company at $300 million. This surpasses the $75 billion valuation discussed by Xai in a recent fundraising round.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Jeff Koons explains his decision to reject AI in the art world: “I refuse to take the easy way out”

HJeff Koons, the world’s most expensive artist, has faced criticism in the past for creating his famous balloon dogs and stainless steel rabbits without physically using his own hands. I have drawn a line. Work – I am contemplating using AI to enhance my work.

The art world is currently abuzz with discussions about the possibilities and risks of artificial intelligence. Deep learning models are now capable of replicating styles and generating unique compositions upon request.

Speaking to the Guardian at the launch of Reflections, a joint exhibition featuring his work alongside Pablo Picasso’s at Granada’s Alhambra Palace, Koons welcomed this divine development. His reliance on a team of craftsmen and cutting-edge technology to create his artwork led Collector magazine to question last year, “Is Jeff Koons a true artist?”




A work juxtaposed with Jeff Koons’ Ball of Gazes (David’s intervention with a Sabine woman) in Granada and Picasso’s Helmeted Head.

Koons has embraced technological advancements in his work. A highly mirror-polished stainless steel Rabbit he created five years ago, designed to mimic the look and materials of a balloon through intensive machining, fetched a record $91 million (£72.5 million). His previous bestseller, a 10-foot-tall steel balloon dog, sold for $58 million in 2013. Additionally, in February, 125 of his miniature lunar sculptures were sent to the moon via a SpaceX rocket, becoming the first authorized art pieces on the moon.

His Gazing ball series has been recreated, with a large blue glass bauble added to the shelf and selecting 35 out of 350 balls before finalizing the artwork. Koons is also exploring innovative avenues. He shared, “I have a few projects in mind. We have had insightful discussions with individuals at the forefront of AI development.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Tesla’s Chairman warns that Elon Musk may step down if shareholders reject $56 billion compensation package

The chairman of Tesla has suggested that Elon Musk might leave the company if shareholders do not support his $56 billion (£44 billion) pay package, implying that Musk has other opportunities to explore. Despite the vote next week on the CEO’s compensation deal, Robin Denholm emphasized that the decision is not solely about money, as Musk will still be one of the richest individuals regardless of the outcome.

Denholm mentioned that if the June 13 vote does not go in Musk’s favor, he could potentially depart from Tesla or reduce his presence at the company. In 2018, investors approved a similar compensation plan for Musk, which was later invalidated, prompting the board to seek investors’ approval once more.

Denholm emphasized the importance of Musk’s time and energy, stating that while he has many ideas and potential endeavors, Tesla and its owners should be his primary focus. Concerns have been raised by some investors about Musk’s engagement with Tesla given his involvement in other ventures like SpaceX, xAI, and X.

Denholm clarified that the compensation package includes a provision requiring Musk to hold the Tesla shares he receives for five years before selling any of them. With Musk’s net worth at $203 billion, he is currently ranked as the third wealthiest person globally, according to Bloomberg.

ISS and Glass Lewis have advised shareholders to vote against the proposed pay package, citing excessive payouts. Despite differing opinions among major investors, Denholm stressed the need to uphold the 2018 agreement to ensure Musk’s continued dedication and commitment to Tesla.

Skip Newsletter Promotions

In a bid to streamline operations and facilitate growth, Denholm proposed relocating Tesla’s legal domicile to Texas, highlighting the state’s favorable corporate laws and potential for innovation. She noted that Texas legislators and courts are well-equipped to handle Tesla’s future endeavors effectively.

Analyst Dan Ives believes that while Musk is unlikely to leave Tesla entirely, a rejection of the compensation package could lead to his stepping down as CEO and reducing his involvement with the company over time.

Source: www.theguardian.com