Is the disappearance of the Y chromosome spelling the end for men?

What might the future look like in a world without men? Recent studies indicate that the Y chromosome, a crucial factor in determining male identity, is experiencing malfunctioning.

The Y chromosome has already undergone significant degeneration and could potentially vanish entirely. But what implications would this disappearance have?

Could new sexes emerge? Or could the male species face extinction? Renowned Australian geneticist Jenny Graves, an expert on the Y chromosome, sheds light on these developments.

Why is the Y chromosome disappearing?

First, let’s revisit the concept of sex chromosomes. Women typically have two X chromosomes, while men possess one X and one Y chromosome.

These chromosome pairs, which account for about 4% of an individual’s DNA, play a vital role in determining sex.


undefined


“Chromosomes typically occur in pairs, with men and women sharing the same sex pairs. Women have two large X chromosomes, whereas men have one X and one Y,” explains Graves.

“In comparison to the X chromosome, the Y chromosome is relatively small, containing only 45 genes, with one gene determining maleness and several others involved in sperm production. The remaining genes serve uncertain purposes. By contrast, the X chromosome contains 900-1400 genes.

Originally, the Y chromosome had over 900 genes similar to the X chromosome. Presently, only 45 genes remain. These sex chromosomes evolved from identical non-gender-associated chromosomes, rendering much of their current makeup functionally redundant.

The degeneration of the Y chromosome is not unique to humans; it also occurs in other species. For instance, fruit flies have lost the majority of their Y chromosomes.

“The loss of the Y chromosome seems to stem from a couple of factors. The Y chromosome is exclusively present in the testes, never in the ovaries; thus, it is constantly exposed to mutations during sperm production,” explains Graves.

“Sperm production involves numerous cell divisions, each susceptible to mutations that can substantially affect the chromosomes. Moreover, the Y chromosome cannot engage in genetic exchange, hindering its ability to repair mutations effectively.”

Most chromosomes repair mutations by exchanging DNA with their counterpart chromosome, a process known as recombination. However, the Y chromosome, inherited singly unlike the dual X chromosomes in women, lacks this mechanism for genetic exchange.

What does this mean for the future of the male species?

Compared to its original state, the human Y chromosome has lost 97% of ancestral genes, while the X chromosome remains relatively intact.

What are the implications of this rapid degeneration for the male species? Are we on the verge of a world devoid of human males?

“When I mention rapid degeneration, I refer to an evolutionary timeframe. Sex chromosomes have undergone roughly 180 million years of evolution in mammals. It took this long for the Y chromosome to erode to its current state,” notes Graves.

“The impending loss of the Y chromosome has stirred concern in some quarters. A rough estimate suggests it might take another six or seven million years before the chromosome completely disappears.”

Unless global billionaires achieve immortality breakthroughs, humans may never witness the initial stages of Y chromosome degradation. But hypothetically, what might this development entail?

While some species can reproduce through parthenogenesis (unfertilized egg development), humans require sperm-bearing genes for optimal functioning. These genomically imprinted genes necessitate male involvement for reproduction. However, viable alternatives exist.

“Evolving new sex-determining genes could pave the way, as seen in certain rodent species like the eastern European mole rat and Japanese spiny rat, which lack a Y chromosome entirely. These rodents adapted by relocating crucial Y chromosome genes to other chromosomes.”

Although successful in rodents, this strategy may not yield the same results in humans. While creating new sex genes is feasible, the ensuing clash between old and new genes poses uncertainties.

“This gene conflict scenario could potentially lead to divergent sex-determining systems across human populations,” Graves explains. At present, these speculations predominate. While the Y chromosome’s deterioration is evident, the future outcomes remain uncertain, encompassing the possibility of evolutionary changes resulting in new sexes.

Given the Y chromosome’s peculiarities and the substantial human population, Graves suggests that an individual born without a Y chromosome might already exist somewhere in the world, broaching intriguing evolutionary prospects.


About our expert Jenny Graves

Jenny Graves is a geneticist and professor at the La Trobe Institute for Molecular Sciences. She has authored over 430 articles and four books on genetics, establishing herself as a leading authority on human evolution and the evolving landscape of the Y chromosome.

read more:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

The Future of Advertising: Astronauts Climbing and Spelling Mistakes

James Blake/Falklands Marine Heritage Trust

Advertisement from hell

Feedback is often confused or intrigued by the tricks advertisers use to try to sell things, but more recent strategies have been tricking them in the wrong direction, such as intentionally weird capitalization or bad grammar. It seems that it is designed to.

While we were fiddling with our smartphones, Feedback kept coming across ads for mobile games that promised “the most difficult levels ever.” We spent several days trying to figure out why it looks that way.

The name of the game in question is Climb! It's a puzzle game in which a group of climbers climbs to the top of a mountain, tangles safety lines, and the player must untie them. So it's essentially the flip side of Feedback TV, except it's gamified and at least somewhat solvable.

Feedback initially wondered if this was a non-English speaking developer skimping on translation costs. There is precedent for this. Dating back to 1991, it's a Japanese space shooter. zero wing It was released in Europe with a notorious translation. As a result, in the introductory cutscene, the alien invaders announced:all your bases are ours” After it was rediscovered in the late 1990s, it became one of the most widely shared internet memes of the time.

However, if you look closely, Climb! It suggests something else is going on. It's made by a company called FOMO Games. Although the company is based in Turkey, its staff clearly have good English skills, as evidenced by the information provided for all of the company's other games. Not to mention, as the company's brilliant corporate text on its website explains, “FOMO stands for Fear Of Missing Out.” This defines our product vision and culture. ”

Rather, the feedback makes me suspect that the poor English is intentionally designed to get our attention. In line with this, the ad also has other strange features that add to its strangeness. What's notable is that the game's title makes no sense at all, as the game's mountaineers have been replaced by spacesuit-clad astronauts floating against a starry sky. It wasn't until I saw the game in the app store that the mountaineering theme was revealed and things became clear.

This seems like a new and devilish way to promote products online. They intentionally create a perfect hash of their ad, hoping that this will pique people's interest and make them click through.

And on some level it worked. Because we are here. But the feedback is not downloading the game. As a general rule, we do not believe in rewarding intentionally incorrect spellings.

monkey in politics

At the time of this writing, the US presidential election is imminent, and the feedback has fallen into a never-ending cycle of news articles reporting polls, experts endlessly reinterpreting that poll, and then doing more polls. I am. This is a very long-winded way of saying, “I don't know what's going to happen.”

Now, our colleague Alexandra Thompson has highlighted an important new contribution to the field of mimetic prediction: a paper titled “Monkey predicts US election”.

Unfortunately, this doesn't require having countless monkeys in the voting booth. Instead, the researchers showed the monkeys pairs of photos of candidates for the Senate and gubernatorial races.

Monkeys spent more time looking at the losers than the winners. This seems like a unique form of torture for politicians. It says that not only did you lose, but the monkey looked at you with critical eyes.

This study extended previous research showing that children can identify election winners and losers purely based on pictures of candidates. Both children and monkeys made choices based on face shape, and a square jawline was a key indicator of increased chances of victory.

Who would do such research? Three of the researchers are affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania, while the fourth is affiliated with a research institution in Portugal. Champalimaud Unknown Center. I don't really know what to make of the feedback.

Unconscious factors seem to influence our voting decisions. It's often said that taller candidates tend to win in American elections, and there appears to be some truth to this.

A 2013 study extracted data on every U.S. presidential election to date and found: tall candidate Although they received more votes in the popular vote, this did not actually make them more likely to be elected. It can only be described as double subject determinism, and one of the authors is a social psychologist. Abraham Bunck.

Readers interested in the outcome of the US election are advised: Whatever you do, don't look up the respective heights of Donald Trump and Kamala Harris.

One more for the road

In these stressful times, like many people, your feedback is directed toward comforting alternative realities such as: great british bake off (great british baking showif you live in North America).

There are lots of all kinds of fascinating and delicious things to learn about the ingredient science of bread, cakes and biscuits, but the show's home production of all sample biscuits, tarts and desserts to meet the technical challenges economists are called hattie baker.

Have a story for feedback?

You can email your article to Feedback at feedback@newscientist.com. Please enter your home address. This week's and past feedback can be found on our website

Source: www.newscientist.com