Just Smile: 5 Teachers Share Strategies for Managing ‘Six-Seven’ Challenges in the Classroom

A new meme phenomenon is taking classrooms by storm, with students across the UK excitedly calling out “six-seven” during lessons.

While some educators choose to overlook this trend, others are finding ways to cope. Here, five teachers share their experiences and strategies.

“I thought I had said something inappropriate.”

In September, I was discussing exam preparations with a group of Year 11 students. At one point, I mentioned something like, “…if you’re studying up to 6th or 7th grade…” and was caught off guard when the entire class erupted in laughter.

Initially, I wondered if I had unintentionally said something offensive or if my accent sounded odd. While I felt a bit frustrated, I was genuinely curious, recognizing that their laughter wasn’t meant to be unkind. So, I asked them to clarify. Unfortunately, their explanations left me puzzled and I still couldn’t grasp what was funny.

Adding to the humor was a weighing gesture one of the students made while I spoke, which I later learned often accompanies “6-7,” as if to illustrate my thought process.

To address this, I now try to mention it frequently; nothing deflates a trend quicker than adults trying to participate.
James, secondary school teacher, North London

“If you feed it, it turns into chaos.”

Understanding this helps avoid mistakes like mentioning, “In 1933, there were 6 or 7 million unemployed people in Germany.” When faced with unavoidable numbers, having clear behavioral policies can help; they can be enforced just like any other disruption, but I’ve rarely had to do that. Policies matter, but when students believe in the school’s objectives, they are less likely to be sidetracked by online trends (at least during class).

With “6-7,” I avoided wasting lesson time, only occasionally raising my eyebrows and responding with, “Yes, that’s a number. Well done.” If you feed it, it will turn into chaos. I manage it just as I would with any other disruption.

Remember the 9+10=21 phase? There’s no doubt another trend will follow this. Kids will always have their fads. When I was younger, we had our own trends too (though admittedly outside class).

Children will always be unpredictable, and it’s up to us adults to guide them back on track. Random numbers should highlight conditions for engagement, not be an extensive list of rules.
Connor, 39, London general history teacher

“They want to belong.”

Kids use this chant as a way to bond in the playground. When one person initiates it, others respond to signal belonging to that group. It resembles a call-and-response dynamic, like a soccer cheer, forming an unspoken language among them. I don’t believe it carries any deeper meaning—they just know they’re supposed to say it. Whatever the latest trend, they want to be part of it.

However, this is not permitted in my classroom. Loud outbursts serve as red flags. Math classes can be particularly challenging. My fifth graders (ages 9-10) tend to be more compliant with rules, which I recognize can differ in secondary school. [school] That may pose another challenge.

After 15 years in teaching, I notice these fads typically last 3-4 weeks. This one will fade soon; they shift trends frequently, especially when younger siblings start using it, then it loses its appeal.
Jane, early 50s, primary school teacher, North West England

“We simply have to share a laugh.”

My first encounter with this trend was back in August while teaching English at a foreign language institution. I noticed mainly boys were initiating it among students aged 12 to 18. At the time, I had no clue what it was, but now at 24, I recognize it as a meme akin to those I observed during my own school years.

Trends are ever-evolving. “Skibidi toilet” was a viral meme during my training, but it didn’t dominate my class environment in the same way “six-seven” does. Unlike “six-seven,” “Skibidi toilet” never appeared on the blackboard, rendering it obscure for students.

I typically ignore it or join in the laughter if I inadvertently say it, empathizing with them and recognizing it as just part of contemporary culture. They yearn for a sense of community and shared experience.
Harriet, 24, English teacher at a foreign language school, South of England

“Shouting playfully means I hardly hear it anymore.”

After 30 years in teaching, I have witnessed countless trends, yet this one stands out.

When I first came across this phrase after summer holidays, I exclaimed, “What a perfect example for a reading report! Well done!” Coupled with my playful yelling at students (often with hand signals), I find I seldom hear it anymore.

Students often react with wide-eyed amusement. You can see it on their faces—they’re thinking, “Oh, come on.” Seeing a teacher akin to their grandfather saying it heightens the awkwardness.
Paul, 54, secondary school teacher, Cheshire

“Emerging from a global slang repertoire.”Mr. Miss.

Transforming mindless phrases into memes isn’t a new concept. Terms like ‘sigma’, ‘skibidi’, and ‘kook’ represent a growing global lexicon. What’s striking about “6-7” is its extensive reach and universal recognition, particularly in English-speaking cultures. I may come off as a ‘teacher’ for saying this, but in my time, schools had localized slang.

Kids are often consuming the same content on social media, easily sharing it and leading to rapid trends. Today’s youth are much more interconnected to global trends and pop culture thanks to the rise of short-form video content, allowing them to quickly absorb vast amounts of information. Combine this with America’s prominent cultural exports, and you get a worldwide phenomenon like “6-7.”
George, 26, apprentice history teacher, London

Source: www.theguardian.com

The introduction of AI to young children by parents and teachers: methods and rationale

sWith the introduction of ChatGpt in late 2022, generative artificial intelligence moved from adult users in office settings to college students in campus libraries and even teenagers in high school hallways. As the youngest among us start exploring AI technologies, parents and teachers are grappling with the responsibility of introducing children under 13 to these transformative tools. Though tools like Google’s Gemini and other AI models set age restrictions, many parents and teachers are taking it upon themselves to educate children about AI.

Inspired by stories of parents teaching their children AI skills to prepare them for success in school and beyond, we reached out to Guardian readers to learn how and why others are doing the same. While our original stories focused on parents, we also included responses from teachers, recognizing their role in preparing children for the future.

Some parents and teachers have embraced AI fully, integrating ChatGpt into everyday interactions with children, using it to explain concepts, answer questions, and share imaginative stories. Others approach AI cautiously, limiting its use to controlled settings due to the potential risks it may pose to young users.

On the other hand, some parents and teachers choose not to expose their children to AI at all, expressing concerns about potential harm and ethical implications that remain unresolved. While differing in their approaches, each perspective contributes valuable insights to the ongoing dialogue about AI education.

The responses below have been edited for brevity and clarity.

Parents Explain the World with AI’s Help

I’ve discovered that introducing AI to my children has been an unexpected joy of parenting. Instead of saying “Let’s google,” my 9 year old now asks, “Daddy, can you chat?” when he needs help with homework. He’s learning to seek guidance rather than just answers.

My 6 year old’s endless questions often test my patience. In those moments, AI comes to the rescue, keeping him engaged and imaginative with topics like dinosaurs and space. It’s a mental recharge for me.

With three daughters, we’ve moved from reading princess stories to creating our own imaginative adventures, thanks to AI.

– Matt, Consultant, 44, Palm Beach Gardens, FL

I use AI as an intellectual backup when I can’t answer my kids’ questions. We have AI voice assistants at home and in the car, helping us with random queries and homework tasks. It streamlines our discussions and keeps learning active. However, I caution my kids about the accuracy of AI responses, as they can sometimes be misleading.

– Graham, Writer, Lumberhurst Quarter

I incorporate AI tools into my daily interactions with my 3 year old, using them to explore nature and answer his questions about the world. I encourage his curiosity and engagement while limiting screen time and passive activities.

While AI is a part of our routine, it’s not the sole focus.

– Nate, Data Scientist, East Bay, California.

I’m introducing my eldest to Openai’s ChatGpt, portraying it as a creative assistant for generating ideas and resources. I teach her to approach AI skeptically and not to rely solely on its responses.

– Ben, 47, Entrepreneur, Germany

To showcase AI to my children, I use ChatGPT to generate stories and engage them in critical thinking by analyzing the authenticity of AI-generated content.

I also encourage them to question misleading information and develop a healthy skepticism towards online content.

– David, Software Developer, Ireland

For students struggling with writing, I recommend using AI for sentence-level feedback and grammar explanations, but caution against relying on AI to create complete essays.

– Jenny, English and Drama Teacher, Valencia, Spain

In my household, AI is used sparingly, with the children understanding it as a tool to enhance their learning and curiosity. We emphasize the importance of personal effort and creativity in achieving success.

– Anton, Fintech Director, Geneva

Rather than introducing AI directly, I stimulate my students’ imagination by using AI tools like Adobe Firefly to inspire descriptive writing and Character.ai to bring historical figures to life. I emphasize the creative potential of AI while also highlighting its limitations.

– Angie, Primary Teacher, Tunbridge Wells

I approach AI education as a generative tool, emphasizing its role as an aid rather than a replacement for imagination. By demonstrating AI’s creative capabilities, students learn to use it responsibly while appreciating its limitations.

– Adam, 28, High School Teacher, Christchurch, New Zealand

AI Fraud is a Growing Issue in Education, But Teachers Shouldn’t Lose Hope | Opinion Piece by John Norton

IThe start of term is fast approaching. Parents are starting to worry about packed lunches, uniforms, and textbooks. School leavers heading to university are wondering what welcome week will be like for new students. And some professors, especially in the humanities, are anxiously wondering how to handle students who are already more adept at Large Language Models (LLMs) than they are.

They have good reason to be worried. Ian Bogost, a professor of film and media, said: and He studied Computer Science at Washington University in St. Louis. it is“If the first year of AI College ended with a sense of disappointment, the situation has now descended into absurdity. Teachers struggle to continue teaching while wondering whether they are grading students or computers. Meanwhile, the arms race in AI cheating and detection continues unabated.”

As expected, the arms race is already intensifying. The Wall Street Journal Recently reported “OpenAI has a way to reliably detect if someone is using ChatGPT to write an essay or research paper, but the company has not disclosed it, despite widespread concerns that students are using artificial intelligence to cheat.” This refusal has infuriated a sector of academia that imagining admirably that there must be a technological solution to this “cheating” problem. Apparently they have not read the Association for Computing Machinery's report on “cheating”. Statement of principles for developing generative AI content detection systemsstates that “reliably detecting the output of a generative AI system without an embedded watermark is beyond the current state of the art and is unlikely to change within any foreseeable timeframe.” Digital watermarks are useful, but they can also cause problems.

The LLM is a particularly pressing problem for the humanities because the essay is a critical pedagogical tool in teaching students how to research, think, and write. Perhaps more importantly, the essay also plays a central role in grading. Unfortunately, the LLM threatens to make this venerable pedagogy unviable. And there is no technological solution in sight.

The good news is that the problem is not insurmountable if educators in these fields are willing to rethink and adapt their teaching methods to fit new realities. Alternative pedagogies are available. But it will require two changes of thinking, if not a change of heart.

First, law graduates, like the well-known psychologist from Berkeley, Alison Gopnik says They are “cultural technologies”, just like writing, printing, libraries, internet searches, etc. In other words, they are tools used by humans. AugmentIt's not an exchange.

Second, and perhaps more importantly, the importance of writing needs to be reinstated in students' minds. processI think E.M. Forster once said that there are two kinds of writers: those who know their ideas and write them, and those who find their ideas by trying to write. The majority of humanity belongs to the latter. That's why the process of writing is so good for the intellect. Writing teaches you the skills to come up with a coherent line of argument, select relevant evidence, find useful sources and inspiration, and most importantly, express yourself in readable, clear prose. For many, that's not easy or natural. That's why students turn to ChatGPT even when they're asked to write 500 words to introduce themselves to their classmates.

Josh Blake, an American scholar, Writes intelligently about our relationship with AI Rather than trying to “integrate” writing into the classroom, I believe it is worth making the value of writing as an intellectual activity fully clear to students. you If you think about it, naturally they would be interested in outsourcing the labor to law students. And if writing (or any other job) is really just about the deliverables, why not? If the means to an end aren't important, why not outsource it?

Ultimately, the problems that LLMs pose to academia can be solved, but it will require new thinking and different approaches to teaching and learning in some areas. The bigger problem is the slow pace at which universities move. I know this from experience. In October 1995, the American scholar Eli Noam published a very insightful article: “The bleak future of electronics and universities” – in ScienceBetween 1998 and 2001, I asked every vice-chancellor and senior university leader I met in the UK what they thought about this.

Still, things have improved since then: at least now everyone knows about ChatGPT.

What I'm Reading

Online Crime
Ed West has an interesting blog post Man found guilty of online posts made during unrest following Southport stabbingIt highlights the contradictions in the British judicial system.

Ruth Bannon
Here is an interesting interview Boston Review Documentary filmmaker Errol Morris Discusses Steve Bannon's Dangerous 'Dharma' his consciousness of being part of the inevitable unfolding of history;

Online forgetting
A sobering article by Neil Firth MIT Technology Review On Efforts to preserve digital history for future generations In an ever-growing universe of data.

Source: www.theguardian.com