Physicists Question Long-Standing Beliefs on Dark Matter’s True Nature

New insights challenge the long-held belief that dark matter was “cold” in the immediate aftermath of the Big Bang. A groundbreaking study from the University of Minnesota Twin Cities and the University of Paris-Saclay reveals that dark matter particles might have been extraordinarily hot and traveling at near-light speeds in the primordial universe, before cooling down during the formative epochs of galaxies and large-scale structures.



Hypothetical dark matter particles. Image credit: University of Adelaide.

For decades, physicists have categorized dark matter based on the velocity of its constituent particles. Cold dark matter is slow enough to clump under gravitational forces, contributing to the formation of galaxies and galaxy clusters.

This categorization is a cornerstone of the standard cosmological model, explaining the universe’s intricate web-like structure.

However, the recent findings indicate that dark matter may have emerged from the hot plasma of the early universe in an ultrarelativistic state—essentially moving at ultra-high speeds—before cooling adequately during the formation of cosmic structures.

This refined perspective broadens the potential behaviors of dark matter particles and expands the pool of candidate particles physicists can investigate through experiments and astronomical observations.

The study concentrates on a critical phase in the early universe known as reheating, which followed an explosive inflationary expansion.

During the reheating phase, the energy fueling the universe’s expansion transformed into a dense hot mixture of particles and radiation.

This discovery suggests that under certain conditions, dark matter produced during this period could exist at speeds approaching that of light while still aligning with the vast universe we observe today.

If validated, these findings could significantly impact ongoing dark matter detection initiatives, including particle colliders, underground detectors, and astrophysical studies.

Moreover, they pose new theoretical challenges regarding the fundamental nature of dark matter and its role in the universe’s evolution.

“Dark matter remains one of the biggest mysteries in physics,” explains Stephen Henrik, a graduate student at the University of Minnesota.

“Historically, one consistent assumption has been that dark matter must be cold at its inception in the primordial universe.”

“Our findings reveal a different narrative. In fact, dark matter may start off as red-hot, but has ample time to cool before galaxies commence formation.”

“The simplest dark matter candidate, low-mass neutrinos, was deemed incompatible decades ago because they could annihilate galaxy-sized structures instead of facilitating them,” states Keith Olive, a professor at the University of Minnesota.

“Neutrinos serve as a prime example of hot dark matter, whose structural formation relies on cold dark matter.”

“If a similar candidate arose during the hot Big Bang, it’s remarkable that it could cool sufficiently to behave as cold dark matter.”

“This new discovery allows us to explore a period in the universe’s history that is very close to the Big Bang,” adds Professor Yann Mambrini, a physicist at the University of Paris-Saclay.

The team’s research has been published in the journal Physical Review Letters.

_____

Stephen E. Henrik et al. 2025. Ultra-relativistic freezeout: Bridge from WIMP to FIMP. Physics Review Letters 135, 221002; doi: 10.1103/zk9k-nbpj

Source: www.sci.news

Transformative Impacts of Anti-Vaccination Beliefs

Sioux Falls, SD – Prior to the widespread implementation of vaccines, catastrophic infections in the U.S. claimed millions of children’s lives and left many others with lifelong health complications.

Over the next century, vaccines successfully eradicated long-standing threats like polio and measles, leading to a significant decrease in many diseases. However, today, as preventable and contagious diseases resurface, vaccine hesitancy is causing a decline in vaccination rates. Moreover, established vaccines are facing skepticism from figures such as Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and some civil servants. Long-time anti-vaccine advocates are influencing perceptions managed by the Federal Health Bureau.

“These concerns, along with hesitations and queries regarding vaccines, stem from the profound success of vaccination, as it has eradicated many diseases,” explained Dr. William Schaffner, an infectious disease specialist at Vanderbilt University Medical Center. “If you don’t experience the disease, you lack respect or fear for it, thus undervaluing the vaccine.”

Anti-vaccine proponents often depict vaccines as perilous, emphasizing the rare side effects while neglecting the significantly greater risks posed by the diseases themselves.

Some Americans are acutely aware of the realities of vaccine-preventable diseases, as revealed in interviews conducted by the Associated Press.

Illness during pregnancy can impact two lives

For decades, Janice Farnham has cared for her daughter Jack. Jack, now 60, was born with congenital rubella syndrome, which caused complications with his hearing, vision, and heart. At the time, there was no vaccine for rubella, and Janice caught the infection early in her pregnancy.

Janice, now 80, did everything within her power to help Jack thrive, yet it took a toll on her own well-being. Jack eventually developed diabetes, glaucoma, autistic tendencies, and arthritis.

A nurse prepares measles, mumps, and rubella vaccines in Harbor Straw, New York, in 2019.
Johannes Eisele/AFP -Getty Images File

Currently, Jack resides in an adult care facility, spending four to five days a week with Janice. She is touched by Jack’s sense of humor and loving nature, frequently showering her with affection and often signing “Double I Love You.”

Given their family’s experiences, Janice finds it “more than frustrating” when individuals opt out of the MMR vaccine against measles, mumps, and rubella.

“I know what the outcome will be,” she expressed. “I simply want to spare others from enduring this.”

Delaying vaccinations can have dire consequences

Over fifty years have passed, yet Patricia Tobin vividly recalls finding her unconscious sister Karen on the bathroom floor.

In 1970, Karen was only six years old when she contracted measles. At that time, vaccines were not mandated for students in Miami. Doctors mentioned vaccinations for first graders, but urgency was not communicated by their mothers.

“It’s not that she was against it,” Tobin clarified. “She believed she had time.”

As measles outbreaks progressed, Karen collapsed in the restroom and never regained consciousness. She succumbed to encephalitis.

“We could never converse with her again,” Tobin mourned.

Presently, all states necessitate certain vaccinations for children to enroll in school. However, an increasing number of individuals are opting for exemptions. Schaffner from Vanderbilt emphasized that memories of measles outbreaks have been worsened by fraudulent studies falsely asserting a link between MMR vaccines and autism.

The result? Most states fall below the 95% vaccination threshold for kindergarten children – the minimum required to shield communities from measles outbreaks.

Preventable diseases can lead to lasting effects

One of Lora Duguay’s earliest memories is lying in a quarantined hospital ward, her frail body surrounded by ice. She was just three years old.

In 1959, polio was rampant in Clearwater, Florida. It was one of the most dreaded diseases in the U.S., leading some paranoid parents to isolate their children during the epidemic.

Due to the infamous nature of polio, the introduction of its vaccine was met with widespread excitement. However, the early vaccines Duguay received had an efficacy rate of only 80% to 90%, leaving many unvaccinated and vulnerable to the virus.

Polio patients receiving treatment with iron lungs in 1950 at a respiratory center in Los Angeles.
Bettmann Archive

The treatment allowed her to walk again, but she eventually developed post-polio syndrome, a neuromuscular disorder that deteriorates over time, leaving her in a wheelchair today.

Many children receive vaccinations now because the illness that changed her life is no longer a threat in the U.S. This new vaccine is much more effective than earlier versions, not only safeguarding individuals but also preventing sporadic cases from escalating among vulnerable populations.

Vulnerable populations remain at risk without vaccinations

Each night, Katie Van Troonhout cradles a small plaster cast of her daughter’s feet, a painful reminder of her child who succumbed to whooping cough in just 37 days.

Curry Grace was born on Christmas Eve in 2009. At just a month old, she showed symptoms of whooping cough after being exposed to someone too young to receive the Tdap vaccine.

At the hospital, Van Troonhout recalls the medical team desperately trying to save her, but “within minutes, she was gone.”

Today, Curry remains a part of her family’s life, with Van Troonhout advocating for vaccination and sharing her story with others.

“It’s our responsibility as adults to protect our children; that’s what parents do,” Van Troonhout stated. “I witnessed my daughter die from preventable illnesses… you don’t want to have my experiences.”

Source: www.nbcnews.com

Your beliefs may be influenced by your wiring, not ideology

In today’s world, partisan divisions are so sharp that it can feel like people are living in completely different realities. According to neuroscientists and political psychologists at the University of Cambridge, such as Leor Zmigrod, they are. In her new book, “The Brain of Ideology: The Radical Science of Flexible Thinking,” Dr. Zmigrod delves into new evidence suggesting that brain physiology and biology can shed light on why people are susceptible to ideology and how information is perceived and shared.

This interview has been edited for clarity and conciseness.

What is ideology?

Ideology is a narrative about how the world operates and should operate, whether in the social or natural realms. It goes beyond just being a story, providing strict guidelines on how to think, act, and engage with others. Ideology discourages deviations from its established rules.

You mention that rigid thinking is attractive. Why is that?

Ideology satisfies the desire to comprehend and explain the world. It also fulfills our need for connection, community, and a sense of belonging. Additionally, relying on established patterns and rules is a cognitively efficient strategy for navigating the world, as many ideologies insist that adhering to their rules is the morally correct way to live.

I approach this from a different angle: ideology hinders direct engagement with the world, limiting our ability to adapt to it, understand evidence, and differentiate between trustworthy and unreliable information. Ideology is seldom beneficial.

Q: The book discusses research showing that ideological thinkers can become unreliable storytellers. Can you elaborate?

This phenomenon has been observed even in children. In the 1940s, psychologist Frenkel Brunswick conducted studies on children’s bias levels and authoritarianism tendencies. When these children were given stories to recall, those with strong prejudices tended to distort the narratives to fit their biases, inventing details that aligned with their ideologies.

In contrast, children with less ideological leanings were more accurate in their story retellings, remaining faithful to the original narrative and recalling the characters’ traits correctly. This suggests that ideologically-driven individuals often incorporate fiction that reinforces their existing biases into their memories.

Do ideologues tend to integrate less information? How do they handle it differently?

Individuals inclined towards ideological thinking often resist change and nuance. This resistance is evident in tasks involving visual and verbal puzzles, where ideological thinkers struggle to adapt when the rules are altered, clinging to outdated frameworks even when they are no longer effective.

On the other hand, individuals who are more adaptable are willing to modify their behavior in response to new evidence. Ideological thinkers, however, tend to resist change and persist in applying outdated rules despite their ineffectiveness.

You have conducted a study indicating fundamental differences in brain reward circuits between ideologues and non-ideologues. Could you elaborate on your findings?

My research has revealed that individuals with strong ideological tendencies exhibit genetic traits related to dopamine distribution in the brain.

Rigid thinkers typically have lower dopamine levels in the prefrontal cortex and higher levels in the striatum. Thus, our susceptibility to rigid ideology may stem from biological variances.

Moreover, individuals with differing ideologies may exhibit variations in brain structure and function. This is particularly noticeable in brain networks associated with reward processing, emotional regulation, and error detection.

For instance, the size of the amygdala, a brain region linked to emotional processing, influences whether an individual leans towards a conservative ideology that upholds tradition and the status quo.

What are your thoughts on this?

Some researchers interpret these findings as a correlation between amygdala function and conservative ideological leanings. Both revolve around a heightened response to threats and fears.

The ambiguity surrounding these results raises the question: does our brain shape our politics, or can ideology reshape our brains?

Can we alter our wired-in ideologies?

Ultimately, individuals have the capacity to choose whether to adopt or reject ideologies.

While it may be challenging for those predisposed to rigid thinking due to genetic or biological factors, it is not predetermined or impossible to change.

Source: www.nytimes.com

New DNA evidence from Pompeii challenges prior beliefs about ash-covered victims

After centuries, it has been discovered that long-standing beliefs about some of the inhabitants of Pompeii were not as accurate as previously thought.

Recent DNA analysis of human remains from the ancient Roman town destroyed by the eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79 AD has shown that some victims were misidentified, challenging modern assumptions. This has shed light on how historical data is viewed in the past.

The authors of the study published in the journal Science on Thursday wrote, “We have found that traditional interpretations regarding an individual’s gender and familial connections do not align with the new evidence.” They also added, “It is not always reliable to apply modern gender norms when interpreting historical information.”

Archaeologists in Pompeii famously immortalized the victims by using plaster to recreate their bodies, leading to various stories being told about them. For example, it was believed for a long time that two women died embracing each other and a mother was found holding her child.

However, the new DNA analysis revealed that the individual thought to be the child’s mother was actually an unrelated man. Additionally, at least one of the individuals believed to be sisters or mother and daughter were actually both men.

Professor David Reich, one of the authors of the study, warned about the dangers of inventing stories about gender and family relationships in ancient societies based on present-day expectations.

The study involved researchers from the University of Florence in Italy and the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany. They used preserved genetic material to determine the gender, ancestry, and genetic relationships of the victims by examining 14 casts that had been preserved for about 2000 years.

Their findings also showed that the residents of Pompeii were diverse, with ancestral roots primarily traced back to immigrants from the Eastern Mediterranean. This underscores the multicultural nature of the city and its inhabitants.

Mount Vesuvius had been mostly inactive before the catastrophic eruption that lasted over 24 hours with devastating power. The eruption buried Pompeii, home to an estimated 20,000 people, under layers of ash, pumice, and mud, preserving the city for centuries.

Pompeii remained buried and forgotten until its rediscovery in 1748. In the 19th century, archaeologists used a technique to create casts of the victims by pouring plaster into the voids left by decomposed bodies, resulting in lifelike molds that captured the victims’ final moments.

Ongoing research on Pompeii continues to unveil new insights into the ancient city and its inhabitants. Recent discoveries, such as using artificial intelligence to decipher a charred scroll and the unveiling of a luxurious home, highlight the constant exploration of Pompeii’s history.

Source: www.nbcnews.com

The Psychology Behind Paranormal Beliefs: Insights from a Ghostbusters Consultant

When something strange happens in your neighborhood, who do you call? Most likely, the police, as ghosts and Ghostbusters are not real. However, that doesn’t stop people from believing in the paranormal.

According to a 2019 YouGov poll, 45% of Americans believe in ghosts. Meanwhile, a YouGov poll from 2016 found that Britons are more likely to believe in creepy spirits than in the existence of God. A nostalgic sequel, “Ghostbusters: Frozen Empire,” is set to be released this month. Why do people struggle with belief in ghosts?

“It tends to be driven by two factors,” says Richard Wiseman, Professor of Public Understanding in Psychology at the University of Hertfordshire. “One is personal experience. Many claim to have experienced paranormal phenomena after losing a loved one.

“The second factor is popular media. Most experiences are easily rationally explained. For instance, phenomena like double exposures in photography used to be common but have decreased with the rise of camera phones, making ghosts less common.”

Wiseman explains that both drivers tap into various psychological traits, some universal and others unique to certain individuals.

“Humans have imaginative minds,” he says. “We seek to imagine a world free of pain and suffering, where loved ones are still present. We are creatures that seek patterns, but sometimes we overwork ourselves and see patterns that aren’t real.”

Wiseman connects belief in ghosts to creativity. For example, a 2013 study at the University of British Columbia found that people are more likely to attribute human characteristics to non-human objects, making them more likely to believe in ghosts.

“Those who believe in such phenomena typically share similar psychological traits,” Wiseman notes. “They are open-minded, creative, and excel at immersing themselves in experiences like plays and movies, identifying patterns.”

However, one can harness this inherent creativity. A study by psychologist Dr. James Horan in the 1990s found that people were more likely to believe in the paranormal when “primed,” a psychological term describing how one stimulus affects subsequent stimuli.

©Christina Cali

“He took two groups around disused movie theaters,” Wiseman elaborates. “One group was told it was an architecture tour with nothing out of the ordinary, while the other group was told it was haunted. As a result, the latter group began experiencing phenomena. Ambiguity and suggestions can influence how we perceive and report experiences. Psychics often utilize this technique.”

The power of human beliefs can shape our reality, sometimes leading to belief in foolish things like ghosts or harmful notions like conspiracy theories. Yet, Wiseman chooses to focus on the positive aspect of this phenomenon.

“When we consider great scientific achievements like landing a man on the moon or developing a coronavirus vaccine in record time, we realize the power of belief in achieving near-impossible feats. Despite sometimes being led astray by ghosts, we can achieve remarkable things through belief, even with minimal evidence. That’s the trade-off for greatness.”

About our expert Professor Richard Wiseman

Richard is Professor of Public Understanding in Psychology at the University of Hertfordshire. He is a former professional magician, a member of the Inner Magic Circle, an Honorary Fellow of the British Science Association, and a Fellow of the Rationalist Association.

Read more popcorn science:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Recent study challenges previous beliefs about forest resilience

Recent research has shown that trees in humid regions are more vulnerable to drought, challenging previous beliefs about tree resilience. The study, which included analysis of more than 6.6 million tree rings, revealed that trees in arid regions are surprisingly drought tolerant. This finding highlights the widespread effects of climate change on forests and suggests that genetic diversity in drier regions may be important for adapting to changing conditions. There is. Credit: SciTechDaily.com

Scientists have flipped the script and revealed that trees in humid regions are more sensitive to drought.

This holiday season brings some surprising news about Christmas trees. Scientists have found that globally, trees that grow in wetter regions are more sensitive to drought. This means that if your tree was grown in a humid climate, it has likely been damaged over generations.

Debate over drought tolerance of trees

Scientists have long debated whether arid environments make trees more or less tolerant of drought. It seems intuitive that trees living at the biological margin are most vulnerable to climate change. Because even the slightest bit of extra stress can send a tree over the brink. On the other hand, these populations may be better able to withstand drought because they are adapted to harsher environments.

The trees of this lush temperate forest in the Cascade Mountains of Washington state may be less drought tolerant than trees in drier regions of the South.Credit: Joan Dudney

Insights from new research

According to a new study published in the journal science Increased water availability could “kill” trees by reducing their ability to adapt to drought, according to researchers from the University of California, Santa Barbara and the University of California, Davis. “And that’s really important to understand when we think about the global vulnerability of forest carbon stocks and forest health.” said Joan Dudney, an assistant professor and ecologist. “You don’t want to be a ‘spoiled’ tree when faced with a major drought.”

Dudney and his co-authors predicted that trees growing in the driest regions would be more sensitive to drought because they were already living on the edge of their limits. Furthermore, climate change models predict that these regions will dry out more rapidly than wetter regions. This change in climate can expose trees to conditions beyond their ability to adapt.

Methodology: Tree ring analysis

To measure drought sensitivity, the authors analyzed 6.6 million tree ring samples from 122 trees. seed World wide. They measured whether a tree was growing faster or slower than average based on the width of its growth rings. They correlated these trends with historical climate data such as precipitation and temperature.

The team then compared different regions’ responses to drought. “As you move to the drier edge of a species’ range, trees become less and less sensitive to drought,” said lead author Robert Heilmeyer, an environmental economist with the Environmental Research Program and the Bren School. he said. “Those trees are actually very resilient.”

Dudney, Heilmeyer, and their co-author Frances Moore were partially inspired by UCSB professor Tamma Carleton’s research on the effects of climate change on humanity. “This paper highlights the value of interdisciplinary scientific research,” added Moore, an associate professor at the University of California, Davis. “We applied economics methods originally developed to study how people and businesses adapt to changing climate, and applied them to ecological contexts to study the sensitivity of forests to drought. could be applied to.”

“A heat wave is likely to kill more people in a cool place like Seattle than in a hot city like Phoenix,” Heilmeyer said. It’s already quite hot in the Southwest, with a scorching heatwave occurring. But cities in the region are adapted to extreme climates, he points out. We now know that forests exhibit similar trends.

Impact on warm regions

Unfortunately, temperate regions are expected to become disproportionately drier in the coming decades. “Significant parts of the species’ ranges will be faced with entirely new climates, a phenomenon that these species do not find anywhere else in their ranges today,” Heilmeyer explained. The authors found that in 2100, 11% of the average species’ range will be drier than the driest part of its historical range. For some species, this increases to 50% or more.

“Broadly speaking, our study highlights that very few forests will be immune to the effects of climate change,” Dudney said. “Even wet forests are under more threat than we realize.”

But there’s also the other side of the coin. This species stores drought-tolerant resources in drier parts of its range and has the potential to strengthen forests in wetter regions. Previous research UCSB researchers have revealed that many species have the ability to adapt to environmental changes. But these researchers also discovered that trees move slowly from one generation to the next. This means that human intervention, such as assisted migration, may be required to take advantage of this genetic diversity.

Christmas tree and the fate of the forest

Whether the Christmas tree lives in a dry or humid region, its growth may decrease in the future. But understanding how trees respond to climate change can help secure the future of Tannenbaum and its wild trees.

Reference: “Drought sensitivity of mesic forests increases vulnerability to climate change” by Robert Heilmeyer, Joan Dudney, and Frances C. Moore, December 7, 2023. science.
DOI: 10.1126/science.adi1071

Source: scitechdaily.com