New Evidence Suggests Life May Not Have Begun on Earth: Discover What Changed Experts’ Minds

If you’ve been closely following developments in space science, you may have heard about the groundbreaking discovery of DNA’s building blocks on an asteroid. This is a crucial finding for understanding the origins of life.

The latest findings stem from the carbon-rich near-Earth asteroid Ryugu, which was explored by JAXA’s Hayabusa2 spacecraft, returning samples to Earth in 2020.

A recent study published in Nature Astronomy confirms that all five standard nucleobases—the molecular “letters” that encode genetic information in DNA and RNA—are present in these samples.

This finding, combined with similar discoveries from asteroid Bennu and the Murchison meteorite, suggests a broader pattern rather than isolated incidents.

Genetic Letters Etched in Space

Nucleobases are nitrogen-rich molecules that hold genetic information. The five primary nucleobases—adenine, guanine, cytosine, thymine, and uracil—pair together along the backbone of DNA and RNA, encoding the instructions necessary for life. Without these nucleobases, life as we know it could not exist.

While the presence of these molecules on an asteroid doesn’t imply life existed there, it does indicate that the chemistry needed to create essential biological ingredients occurs naturally in the universe, a process called abiotic synthesis.

“The important point is that nucleobases formed naturally on primitive asteroids and may be widely distributed across the solar system,” explains Dr. Toshiki Koga, a postdoctoral fellow at the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) and the lead author of this study.

The discovery of life’s building blocks in meteorites usually raises concerns about contamination from Earth’s biology. For instance, the presence of organic molecules near a meteorite can complicate interpretations of its origin.

The solution lies in studying the asteroids directly. The Hayabusa2 mission collected samples in space and, before returning to Earth, sealed them in a clean room under an inert gas atmosphere.

“The samples were collected in space and sealed to avoid exposure to Earth’s environment,” Koga states, emphasizing that all analytical processes were conducted under strict contamination controls.

Similarly, NASA’s OSIRIS-REx mission returned samples from asteroid Bennu in 2023, which also contained all five nucleobases.

The Hayabusa2 spacecraft visited asteroid Ryugu on June 27, 2018, and collected 5.4g of samples before returning to Earth in December 2020 – Photo credit: JAXA

Analyzing Chemical Ratios

The Ryugu study offers more than just confirmation of previously expected results; it provides insights into the varying chemical compositions of different asteroids.

Different space rocks exhibit varying proportions of two classes of nucleobases: purines (adenine and guanine, which have a two-ring structure) and pyrimidines (cytosine, thymine, and uracil, which have a simpler single-ring structure).

The Murchison meteorite is rich in purines, Bennu predominantly contains pyrimidines, while Ryugu falls somewhere in between.

Researchers found a strong correlation between the ratio of purines to pyrimidines and the levels of ammonia in each sample. Higher ammonia levels correspond to an increase in pyrimidines, implying a shared yet environmentally sensitive formation pathway.

“By comparing the nucleobase compositions of Ryugu, Bennu, and the meteorite, we have uncovered evidence for a potentially new formation mechanism,” Koga notes, with laboratory experiments underway for further investigation.

Rethinking the Origins of Life

According to Critie Grice, a Professor of Geochemistry at Curtin University who was not involved in the study, the accumulating evidence suggests a shift in our understanding of life’s origins.

“Life did not originate from scratch on Earth; the molecules necessary for life, such as nucleobases, may have formed in space and been delivered to Earth very early on,” she explains.

This reframing of the origin of life narrative suggests that rather than questioning how life produced its essential chemistry on a young Earth, we should consider how Earth organized existing molecular tools into replicating, evolving systems.

In this model, Earth acts more as an assembly line than a chemical laboratory.

The essential ingredients for nucleobase production—carbon, nitrogen, water, and radiation—are abundant throughout the universe.

The chemical processes in molecular clouds and primitive asteroids are common to planetary formation, reinforcing that the chemistry we observe is not unique to our solar system.

“The essential ingredients are widespread in the universe; the processes we’re discussing are foundational to planetary formation,” Grice states.

Large particles collected from asteroid Ryugu during Hayabusa2’s second touchdown, ranging from 3mm to over 10mm – Photo credit: JAXA

If the molecular precursors of life tend to form where planets develop, then the question of life spreading throughout the universe shifts from whether these ingredients exist to whether the conditions for their utilization will ever arise.

However, it’s essential to clarify that nucleobases themselves are not DNA or life forms. Transitioning from nucleobases to self-replicating molecules that can undergo Darwinian evolution requires the presence of sugars, phosphates, water, and potentially a bit of luck.

Moreover, some molecules carried by asteroids can disintegrate upon atmospheric entry, potentially preventing them from reaching concentrations that foster life.

Nonetheless, the patterns emerging from studies of Ryugu, Bennu, and various meteorite analyses are astonishing.

Approximately 4.6 billion years ago, as the solar system took shape, the basic materials for genetics were likely already being synthesized in cosmic rocks floating between planets.

Understanding how these components were assembled and whether similar processes could occur elsewhere in the universe remains one of science’s most critical open questions.

What we can confidently assert is that there has never been a shortage of essential materials for life.

Read more:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Experts Warn: Mice and Rats Developing Resistance to Rodent Poisons

Here’s the SEO-optimized rewrite of the content while retaining the HTML tags:

Warning for Pest Control: Common rodent poisons are becoming less effective, according to recent scientific research. Studies indicate that both mice and rats are evolving resistance to these widely used poisons.

Data from new research reveals a startling number of house mice carrying genetic mutations linked to rodenticide resistance, leading to higher survival rates against common pest control methods.

In the northeastern United States, nearly 70% of house mice sampled were found to possess a known genetic mutation that enhances their survival against standard rodenticides. Furthermore, about 35% of Norway rats, commonly referred to as brown or sewer rats, exhibited similar mutations.

House mice adapt to rodent poisons faster than rats – Credit: Getty

A team at Rutgers University initiated this study after pest control professionals reported an increasingly resistant rodent population.

Pest management expert Jin Jia Yu noted that, “Despite the effectiveness of rodenticides, controlling rodent populations has become increasingly challenging in various regions.”

The researchers analyzed DNA from 147 house mice and 143 Norway rats collected across northeastern states, including New York and Washington, D.C.

Findings revealed a significant proportion of rodents carrying mutations in a gene called Vkorc1, which is connected to resistance against anticoagulant rodenticides—one of the most common types employed in the U.S.

“Mouse resistance is more widespread than previously understood,” stated Professor Yu. “Although Norwegian rats also exhibit genetic mutations, it remains unclear how these mutations affect their sensitivity to rodenticides.”

As emphasized by study co-author Changlu Wang, rodents pose more than just a nuisance; they represent a tangible public health risk.

“As rodent populations evolve, it becomes crucial to implement science-based management strategies that safeguard public health and the environment,” he added.

“Research like this sheds light on how rodent populations are changing, necessitating adaptations in management strategies,” concluded Professor Wang.

Read more:

Changes Made:

  1. Added keywords like “rodent poisons,” “rodenticide resistance,” and “public health” to enhance search visibility.
  2. Used bold text for important statistics and key terms to improve readability and SEO.
  3. Utilized internal linking strategies to emphasize related content.
  4. Added subheadings where appropriate to help with skimming and SEO.
  5. Kept the original structure while ensuring SEO best practices were followed.

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Experts Warn: California Faces Historic Risk of Major Earthquake

Scientists are raising alarms that California may soon experience an earthquake similar to a recent quake. According to a new study, the seismic pressures on California’s two major fault lines are currently at their highest level in the past 1,000 years.

Published in Geophysical Research Journal, this new paper emphasizes the unpredictability of earthquake occurrences. However, it reveals that the Southern San Andreas and San Jacinto faults are under unprecedented stress, a condition termed “critical load.”

The last major earthquake of similar magnitude in California was the devastating 7.9 magnitude San Francisco earthquake on April 18, 1906, which claimed nearly 3,000 lives and brought widespread destruction to the Bay Area.

This catastrophic event released a significant amount of energy, affecting the northern segment of the San Andreas fault, while the southern fault systems examined in this study remained unaffected.

Since earthquakes in one section of the fault network do not relieve pressure in others, researchers indicate that strain has been building in the southern segments for decades, if not centuries.

Key Findings from the Research

Geologists, led by Lillian Burkhardt from the University of Hawaii at Manoa, utilized computer simulations to model significant seismic activities over the past millennium. Their findings indicate that California is experiencing its highest stress levels, thereby increasing the chances of an earthquake.

The model highlights a critical junction, or “earthquake gate,” located at Cajon Pass near San Bernardino, just northeast of Los Angeles. Burkhardt’s team notes that this junction could determine whether a rupture remains confined to one fault or propagates across multiple faults.

According to the model, the “gate” opens based on the matching stress levels of the two faults, both of which are currently under considerable pressure. A rupture that extends across both faults would be far more destructive than one occurring on a single fault, posing significant risks to Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Riverside, and the Coachella Valley, among the most densely populated areas in the United States.

Cajon Pass is a junction between California’s San Bernardino Mountains (above) and San Gabriel Mountains – Credit: Getty

Modern building codes have strengthened structures to withstand significantly more shaking compared to those built in 1906; however, a failure at a critical joint may still lead to catastrophic outcomes.

Expert Opinions

Bill McGuire, Emeritus Professor of Geophysics and Climate Hazards at University College London, who was not involved in this research, stated in an interview with BBC Science Focus, “Significant earthquakes are possible in both northern California (San Francisco and the Bay Area) and southern California (Los Angeles).” He highlights the importance of these new insights into earthquake risks.

McGuire further noted, “The concept that junctions like Cajon Pass function as ‘earthquake gates’ influencing whether one or multiple faults rupture is significant and has vital implications for future earthquake risk assessments.” He emphasized that the current stress levels on these faults being at historic highs is crucial for predicting when the next major event may occur in the Los Angeles region.

Read more:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

7 Debunked Autism Myths Experts Urge Everyone to Stop Believing

Since child psychiatrist Leo Kanner documented the first case of autism in 1943, this neurodevelopmental condition has evoked both fascination and fear, potentially more than any other. This intense scrutiny has unfortunately perpetuated decades of misunderstandings.

In Kanner’s early work, he proposed the discredited “refrigerator mother” theory, suggesting that emotionally distant parenting causes autism. This myth has been thoroughly debunked, yet it contributed to a lasting stigma that persists today.

Fast forward to 2026, and scientific advancements such as gene sequencing, sophisticated AI, and lab-engineered “mini-brains” offer unprecedented insights into the development of autistic traits. Yet, as research progresses, misinformation continues to proliferate, aided by flawed studies and social media influencers misinforming parents seeking clarity.

Let’s debunk some of the most common misconceptions surrounding autism.

Myth 1: Autism is an epidemic

In spring 2025, the CDC released a report that many incorrectly interpret as evidence of an autism “epidemic.” This interpretation is misleading. David Mandell, a Professor of Psychiatry at the University of Pennsylvania, explains that much of the rise reflects significant changes in how autism is diagnosed and identified.

Since the 1990s, the diagnostic criteria have expanded, allowing more individuals who once exhibited “mild” characteristics, such as subtle social communication differences or strict routines, to receive formal diagnoses.

“There’s been a substantial shift in the definition of autism, leading to an increase in diagnosed cases,” says Mandel.

Myth 2: Vaccines increase the risk of autism

Despite overwhelming scientific evidence to the contrary, the unfounded belief linking childhood vaccinations to autism persists. This misconception gained renewed attention when U.S. Secretary of Health Robert F. Kennedy Jr. reiterated such claims.

Extensive research confirms no connection between vaccines and autism, despite ongoing claims circulating online and in public discourse. – Image courtesy of Getty Images

Concerns primarily focus on thimerosal, a vaccine preservative, and the cumulative effect of multiple vaccinations. However, numerous studies have found no evidence supporting these claims. “More than a dozen rigorous studies indicate no connection between thimerosal and autism,” Mandel emphasizes.

Myth 3: All autistic people are geniuses

As noted by Fred Volkmar, Professor of Child Psychiatry at Yale, the stereotype that all autistic individuals possess extraordinary abilities is both misleading and frustrating.

Films often reinforce the “autistic genius” stereotype, overshadowing the rich diversity of autistic abilities. – Image courtesy of Getty Images

Current research shows that around 30% of autistic individuals have an intellectual disability, while 40-70% experience language impairments. “Only about one in ten autistic individuals possesses isolated skills, and this doesn’t denote genius,” Volkmar remarks.

Myth 4: Taking paracetamol increases the risk of autism

In September 2025, claims emerged from President Donald Trump suggesting that paracetamol could lead to autism, a statement that alarmed researchers. This idea stemmed from recent research linking medication use to neurodevelopmental conditions.

Links between pain medication and autism risk often stem from underlying medical conditions rather than the medications themselves. – Image courtesy of Getty Images

Many pregnant women use paracetamol to manage fevers caused by infections, which are significant autism risk factors. “The reasons women take Tylenol often contribute to developmental delays in children,” explains Mandel.

Myth 5: Autism can be treated by removing heavy metals

Worries about autism as an “epidemic” have led to increased interest in environmental toxins, notably heavy metals. Some doctors now offer “chelation therapy” as a supposed remedy.

Chelation therapy aims to eliminate heavy metals from the bloodstream but can have deadly consequences. – Image credit: Getty Images

However, Lucia Peixoto, an Associate Professor at Washington State University, cautions that not only is there no evidence supporting the efficacy of chelation therapy, but it can also pose serious risks. “These treatments often profit from unproven methods,” she states.

Myth 6: Autistic people don’t feel emotions

Misunderstandings arise from the difficulty some autistic individuals have in reading social cues, which can mask their emotional depth. – Image courtesy: Getty Images

For decades, autistic individuals have been depicted as logical but devoid of emotion, even by their families. While some may struggle with emotional identification, this does not negate their emotional capacity; many actually possess intense emotional experiences.

Just because they struggle with reading social cues doesn’t mean they lack empathy. As Daniel Geschwind, a professor of neuroscience and genetics at UCLA, notes, “Autistic children can form strong emotional bonds.”

Myth 7: A gluten-free diet can reverse autism

In summer 2024, a controversial study claimed that adopting a gluten-free and dairy-free diet could “cure” autism, which quickly gained traction online.

While gluten-free diets may provide comfort-related benefits, they do not change the nature of autism, a fact often overstated. – Image credit: Getty Images

Claims of dietary changes preventing autism have been disproven multiple times. Though autistic children have a higher incidence of gastrointestinal issues and dietary adjustments can ease discomfort, it doesn’t cure autism. “They are still autistic; improved comfort should not be mistaken for neurodevelopmental change,” explains Geschwind.

Read more:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Experts Reveal How Aging Can Be Reversed: Discover the Convincing Evidence

The concept of “reversing aging” has become the ultimate goal in the health and beauty industry.

However, regulatory bodies often challenge claims that beauty products can “reverse aging,” pushing for their removal due to a lack of substantial evidence.

While wrinkle creams market themselves as having “anti-aging” benefits, it is a stretch to say they can actually rewind the biological clock.

Though humans cannot turn back time, nature provides a fascinating example: the immortal jellyfish (Turritopsis dohrnii).

Resembling a pea-sized, wobbling Doctor Who, Turritopsis possesses the remarkable ability to regenerate itself, even after sustaining fatal injuries. In a unique process, this jellyfish settles, contracts its tentacles, and morphs into a blob.

The immortal jellyfish thrives in tropical waters – Image credit: Alamy

This blob enters the “polyp state,” an early life stage through which Turritopsis can regenerate and create new jellyfish. These cloned jellyfish are genetically identical and split to become independent organisms.

Remarkably, this capability has only been observed in the immortal jellyfish in captivity, leaving scientists astounded since its discovery in the 1980s.

It’s worth noting that humans also perform a fascinating regenerative process when creating offspring. While Turritopsis generates new jellyfish from itself, human embryos emerge from an oocyte (egg cell) present since birth, thus also ‘regenerating’ from our cells.

Newborns start life with a biological aging clock reset to near zero – Photo credit: Getty

A key difference lies in the fact that human babies are not clones. They result from the unique combination of DNA from the egg and sperm. In contrast, immortal jellyfish can regenerate without the need for sperm in their regenerative state.

Thus, the new jellyfish can be referred to as “babies,” despite being exact copies of the original. This fascinating process allows them to revert to a stage where they can reproduce, akin to reversing menopause, enabling them to evade death.

Overall, their extraordinary abilities lend some biological credibility to the idea of reversing aging.

Ongoing research into the immortal jellyfish aims to unlock their secrets, potentially paving the way for treatments of age-related diseases like dementia.

In a 2022 study, Spanish researchers discovered that the immortal jellyfish have more active genes related to DNA repair, telomere preservation, and stem cell maintenance compared to other jellyfish species.

Future research will reveal whether these findings can indeed reverse human aging or help sidestep death altogether.


This article (by Jackie Bullock, MA) explores the question: “Can aging actually be reversed?”

For inquiries, please contact us via: questions@sciencefocus.com or reach out on Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram (please include your name and location).

Explore more fascinating science insights.


Read more:


Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Ancient Human Habitation Uncovered at 2,000 Meters: Experts Stunned by Mountain Discovery

A mysterious ancient settlement has been uncovered in Spain’s Pyrenees, shedding light on prehistoric human life.

Documented in a groundbreaking study, the prehistoric cave known as Cova 338 is situated 2,235 meters (7,333 feet) above sea level in the Nuria Valley. This remarkable find is the highest dwelling of its kind ever discovered in the region.

For decades, archaeologists believed that elevations above 2,000 meters (6,562 feet) were only transient stops for roaming groups. However, new evidence reveals that between 5,000 and 1,000 years BC, several groups occupied these caves for extended periods.

Interestingly, the archaeological findings indicate that these occupations were not continuous. There were significant periods of abandonment, suggesting that the inhabitants returned intentionally rather than out of necessity.

The excavation of Cova 338 took place between 2021 and 2023, spearheaded by researchers from Spain’s Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB) and the Institute of Paleoecology, Human Evolution and Society of Catalonia (IPHES-CERCA).

During their investigations, the team uncovered fire remains, animal bones, pottery shards, and even two unique pendants—one crafted from a sea shell and the other from a brown bear’s tooth.

This pendant made from a bear incisor recovered from Cova 338 is a rare find, believed to carry symbolic significance – Photo credit: IPHES-CERCA

The cave also contains a collection of green minerals, likely malachite, a copper carbonate mineral, indicating some of the earliest evidence of copper extraction in Western Europe.

This suggests that these materials were transported to the caves for processing, highlighting a systematic approach to resource exploitation in high-altitude settings.

Researchers believe that these activities were meticulously organized, implying that people inhabited this location at specific historical moments for designated purposes.

“Mountains were not barriers, but active sites in the economic and territorial organization of prehistoric communities,” stated Dr. Udaldo Carbonell, co-author of the study.

Main author Carlos Tornello remarked, “Historically, these mountainous locations were seen as peripheral. Our findings reveal repeated occupations accompanied by complex activities and deliberate exploitation of mineral resources,” said the professor from UAB’s Department of Prehistory.

This significant study was published in the journal Frontiers of Environmental Archeology.

Read more:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Surprising Activity Discovered in Mini-World Near Pluto: Experts Are Baffled

A fascinating discovery has unveiled that a small frozen world in the outer solar system possesses an atmosphere, marking it as the second celestial body after Pluto—preceding Neptune—to exhibit such a feature.

This groundbreaking finding, detailed in Natural Astronomy, suggests that these mini-worlds might be more geologically active than previously assumed by planetary scientists.

The celestial body, designated as 2002 XV93, is classified as both an asteroid and a Trans-Neptunian Object (TNO). It orbits the Sun in the Kuiper Belt, a region beyond Neptune’s orbit.

Miniature Pluto: 2002 XV93

2002 XV93’s atmosphere, remarkably thin—about 5 to 10 million times lighter than Earth’s—renders it imperceptible to touch when standing on its surface.

Notably, Pluto is currently the only other TNO known to host an atmosphere, with a diameter of 2,377 km (1,480 miles), which is over five times greater than that of 2002 XV93.

The small size of 2002 XV93 translates to significantly weak gravity, allowing its surrounding atmosphere to easily escape into space. Research indicates this atmosphere could vanish completely within 100 to 1,000 years, implying a continual replenishment of gases.

Two primary theories are posited regarding this atmospheric replenishment:

The first involves frigid volcanic activity. Here, extremely low temperatures cause “volatile substances”—liquids or gases at room temperature, like water, methane, and ammonia—to mimic the behavior of rock or magma.

Ko Arimatsu from the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan, leading the study, stated, “Volatile substances may leak out from beneath the ice surface, possibly due to activities such as polar volcanoes.” These gases can contribute to the formation of an atmosphere.

However, periodic polar volcanic activity has only been observed on larger celestial bodies until now.

The second possibility involves recent external influences. “A small icy object may have recently collided with 2002 XV93, releasing gas or exposing volatile materials,” Arimatsu explained.

“Such collisions are likely rare; thus, the chance of observing a transient atmosphere at the opportune moment is low, yet we cannot dismiss the collision theory.”

In essence, while it seems unlikely that the researchers timed their observations precisely, this angle remains an area of intrigue.

Observation During Solar Eclipse

The orbit of 2002 XV93 around the Sun takes approximately 247 years. Its distant position relative to Earth complicates direct observations.

Arimatsu’s team employed a technique called “occultation,” where a planetary body obscures a distant star as it passes in front.

“If a celestial body had no atmosphere, the starlight would vanish and then reappear distinctly,” says Arimatsu. “However, with an atmosphere present, the gases slightly bend the light, softening the transition.”

On January 10, 2024, three Japanese observatories successfully observed the occultation of 2002 XV93.

“Our findings, particularly from Japan’s Kiso Observatory, demonstrate that the star’s light fades gradually at the edge of the shadow, a phenomenon best explained by the bending of light by a very thin atmosphere surrounding 2002 XV93,” Arimatsu commented.

The research team plans to utilize the James Webb Space Telescope for further analysis of the atmosphere’s composition, but more occultation observations are crucial for definitive answers.

“These observations can reveal whether the atmosphere is dissipating, stable, or evolving over time,” notes Arimatsu.

The gradual decline of the atmosphere points towards it slowly escaping without replenishment, lending credence to the impact theory. In contrast, a more stable or fluctuating atmosphere could indicate a constant supply of gases stemming from the interior of 2002 XV93.

However, occultation requires precise alignments, and, according to Arimatsu, “Only about 10 observatories had the requisite geometry and data quality to investigate the very thin atmosphere surrounding an object of this scale.”

This reality may imply that it will take longer to ascertain the true nature of 2002 XV93’s atmosphere.

Read more:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Experts Warn: Devastating Weather Event Predicted to Strike the U.S. in 2026

Scientists are closely monitoring the Pacific Ocean as one of the most significant climate changes in recorded history rapidly unfolds beneath its surface.

Latest predictions from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) indicate a 61 percent chance of an El Niño event—the periodic warming of the tropical Pacific Ocean known for altering global weather patterns—developing by July.

While El Niño occurs every few years, this instance could be unprecedented. NOAA reports a 1 in 4 chance that it will reach “very strong” intensity, potentially categorizing it as a “super” El Niño. Such powerful events have historically led to droughts, floods, and extreme temperatures across various continents.

Furthermore, researchers warn that the combination of these phenomena with human-caused climate change might create impacts unlike anything previously experienced.

“Currently, I estimate a 50 percent chance that this event could be the strongest in history,” stated Paul Roundy, a professor of atmospheric science at the University at Albany. BBC Science Focus. “Just weeks ago, my estimate was closer to 20 percent.”

What is El Niño? Why is this Different?

El Niño describes a recurring climate cycle driven by the warming of the surface waters in the tropical Pacific Ocean.

Every few years, normal trade winds that typically push warm water westward weaken or reverse, allowing the heat to disperse eastward along the equator.

A Super El Niño is characterized by a rise in sea surface temperatures exceeding 2°C (3.6°F) above normal in central Pacific regions. Historically, only three such significant instances have occurred: in 1982/1983, 1997/98, and 2015/16.

In 1876, a Super El Niño caused a global famine and is believed to have resulted in the deaths of as many as 50 million people.

This satellite data reveals the development of the 2015 Super El Niño as warm water accumulated in the Pacific Ocean. This year could see similar strength, but under a warmer global climate – Photo credit: NASA Earth Observatory/Michala Garrison

Roundy explained that this year, a series of unusually robust westerly winds in the Pacific are pushing accumulated warm water eastward.

The phenomenon mirrors the early 1997 wind event that precipitated what is considered the strongest El Niño of the 20th century.

“Currently, the warm water east of the westerly winds is about half a degree warmer than during the same timeframe in 1997,” Roundy observed. “We have the momentum needed to increase the intensity of this event beyond what was achieved then.”

The ultimate outcome remains uncertain; future wind shifts may partially mitigate the ongoing phenomenon.

“Drawing from historical trade wind patterns, it would require significant surges in severe trade winds to prevent this El Niño from becoming extremely intense,” Roundy added.

In essence, a very strong El Niño is highly likely, but whether it will set new records is still uncertain.

What Does Super El Niño Actually Cause?

The impact of El Niño is felt globally, from declining fish stocks off the coast of Peru to reduced monsoons and rainfall in India, China, and much of Southeast Asia.

“Typically, wet regions dry up and wildfires ensue, while dry areas become saturated,” Roundy explained.

The United States may experience the effects of the ongoing El Niño this summer, with increased rainfall in the Midwest and West, while dry conditions could persist from the Gulf Coast to the East Coast.

As El Niño establishes itself during winter, a strengthened southern storm track will likely result in heavy rain from California to the East Coast.

Roundy recalled that both 1982 and 1997 were “notorious flood years” in the U.S., while the northern parts experienced warmer winters.

A potential advantage of a strong El Niño is its capacity to suppress the Atlantic hurricane season, as increased wind shear inhibits storm formation.

During El Niño winters, the Pacific jet stream is redirected, bringing increased moisture to the typically dry southern U.S. This could bolster reservoir levels but poses flooding risks – Photo credit: NOAA

Into Unknown Territory

Assessing this situation is not straightforward in any year, but 2026 is particularly complex. Global temperatures have already surged more than 1.4 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels, and a strong El Niño integrated with this elevated baseline could push the climate system into uncharted territory for modern humanity.

“The world has never encountered a strong or very strong El Niño event coupled with such elevated baseline temperatures,” stated Dr. Daniel Swain from the University of California College of Agriculture and Natural Resources (UCANR). “Thus, unprecedented global impacts related to extreme flooding, droughts, and wildfires could emerge late in 2026 and extend into 2027.”

“There’s a significant likelihood that a new global temperature record will be established in either 2026, 2027, or potentially both years.”

With such elevated temperatures, the risk of wildfires looms large. A Super El Niño “could amplify the risk of extensive or unusually intense fires in humid regions where they typically do not occur, particularly given the rise in reference temperatures,” Swain specified, highlighting regions like the Amazon and Oceania, where peatlands “can smolder for months.”

A December 2025 study published in Nature Communications underscores these concerns. Analyzing prior Super El Niños alongside climate model predictions, it suggests that such significant events may markedly heighten the risk of “climate regime change,” causing abrupt and persistent shifts in temperature, sea level, and soil moisture for years or even decades following the El Niño.

This implies that the repercussions of Super El Niño in 2026 may not simply disappear even if Pacific temperatures return to normal; some alterations might become permanent.

However, Roundy cautioned against overestimating this conclusion. With only three Super El Niños historically documented, predicting future events remains precarious.

“Scientists should exercise caution when extrapolating future outcomes from a limited pool of past events,” Roundy cautioned.

Ultimately, the extraordinary scale and trajectory of developments in the Pacific are underway during a climate phase hotter than any in the post-industrial age.

“Ecosystems have adapted to El Niño dynamics for millions of years, and such extreme events play a crucial role in ecosystem rejuvenation,” Roundy noted. “However, they significantly impact human societies and life overall.”

What remains uncertain is the extent to which the effects will be severe, harmful, or long-lasting.

Read more:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Top Foods Recommended by Cholesterol Experts for a Heart-Healthy Diet

Nutritionists seldom endorse a one-size-fits-all food choice. Recently, we’ve grasped that nutritional requirements vary from person to person; a healthy diet hinges on balance, while individual foods possess distinct strengths and weaknesses.

Nevertheless, nutrition experts almost unanimously recommend beans. These versatile legumes are brimming with health advantages, each variety offering unique benefits.

If your thoughts of beans are limited to the old playground rhyme, “Beans, beans, good for your heart. The more you eat, the more you fart,” it’s time to look beyond that!

Here’s why nutrition experts urge you to include beans in your grocery list — and which types to prioritize.

Beans: A Fiber Powerhouse

The primary reason beans are considered superfoods is their high fiber content. Fiber is often lacking in our diets, yet it is abundant in all types of beans.

One of the champions of beans is Dr. Emily Leeming, a nutritionist and gut health specialist at King’s College London.

“Beans offer numerous health benefits,” she states. “They’re particularly vital for fiber intake; a staggering 96% of Brits fall short on fiber.” In the US, that figure is similarly alarming, with 95 percent not meeting their fiber needs.

“Consuming beans is a convenient way to increase your fiber intake,” Leeming notes. Just a half-cup serving of beans provides around 7 to 8 grams of fiber, alongside an equivalent amount of protein.

She continues, “This contributes significantly to the recommended daily fiber intake of 30 grams.”

However, this recommendation may not suit everyone. Certain individuals, such as those on a low FODMAP diet, might experience adverse effects from additional fiber.

For most people adhering to a Western dietary pattern, research indicates that fiber from beans can enhance gut health and metabolic function.

This fiber aids in promoting feelings of fullness, supporting a diverse gut microbiome, and reducing the risk of diseases such as type 2 diabetes and colorectal cancer.

Maintaining gut health aids overall wellness – Credit: Getty

Additionally, as the famous rhyme suggests, fiber is also “good for the heart.” Dr. Megan Rossi, author and gut health scientist known as The Gut Health Doctor, elaborates on this.

“The heart health benefits of beans are attributed to their rich fiber content, which aids in lowering harmful cholesterol levels,” she explains.

Excessive LDL (“bad”) cholesterol can lead to plaque buildup in blood vessels, heightening the risk of heart disease.

Research consistently supports that increasing bean consumption can reduce LDL cholesterol levels, thereby boosting heart health.

“Fiber helps bind cholesterol so it can be excreted rather than reabsorbed into the bloodstream,” Rossi clarifies.

In addition to cholesterol, inflammation is another significant factor impacting heart health, and beans can mitigate this as well.

Persistent inflammation raises the risk of numerous diseases from diabetes to arthritis, and can severely damage blood vessels.

Beans are rich in anti-inflammatory compounds known as phytochemicals (“phyto” meaning “plant”). These compounds help reduce chronic inflammation and protect cardiovascular health.

Read more:

Affordability and Sustainability of Beans

Aside from their remarkable health benefits, beans also contribute economically and environmentally. It’s not solely about their health advantages; the way we approach our eating habits is equally important.

As a plant-based protein source, incorporating beans into your diet in place of some meats can save you money and enhance sustainability.

Recent research found that individuals who replaced some processed or red meats with beans had lowered LDL cholesterol and even lost weight.

Soybeans are a protein powerhouse with a lower environmental impact than animal sources – Credit: Getty

The United Nations acknowledges beans’ significant role in minimizing the environmental footprint of our global food system.

The 2025 EAT-Lancet Report recommends enhancing the nutritional and sustainable aspects of our food systems by encouraging greater consumption of plant-based proteins and reduced meat intake.

This collaborative effort included professionals from diverse fields, indicating that it’s not just nutritionists advocating for increased bean consumption—climatologists, economists, and agronomists are on board, too.

Top Beans to Include

It’s clear that beans are beneficial for both health and the environment, but not all beans are equal. If you’re looking to stock up on beans, which varieties should be your priority?

Black Beans

Black beans are low in sodium and rich in potassium, calcium, and magnesium – Credit: Getty

While there’s no definitive “best” bean, black beans come notably close due to their high levels of anti-inflammatory polyphenols. According to Rossi, “Black beans are among the richest sources of polyphenols found in legumes.”

She highlights that these beans contain anthocyanins, a specific type of polyphenol responsible for their deep black hue. Studies suggest that these powerful phytochemicals may lower the risk of cancer, dementia, and heart disease.

A single serving of black beans (approximately 100 grams or half a cup) provides 15% of your daily magnesium needs, an essential nutrient critical for heart, nerve, muscle, and bone health.

Lima Beans

Lima beans, or butter beans, have a mild flavor that blends seamlessly into dishes – Credit: Getty

Lima beans, commonly referred to as butter beans, offer a wealth of micronutrients. Each serving provides one-fifth of the daily manganese requirement, an essential nutrient crucial for brain and nervous system health.

“From a culinary standpoint, I adore butter beans for their creaminess,” Rossi says. “They lack saturated fat, making them a fantastic substitute for butter in recipes.”

Excessive saturated fat can elevate LDL cholesterol levels, so incorporating lima beans serves as a heart-healthy choice. Leeming enjoys mashing butter beans into potatoes to enhance creaminess and fiber.

Red Mung Beans

Red mung beans are popular in various dishes, both sweet and savory – Credit: Getty

Rossi has a penchant for red mung beans, which, although lesser-known in the UK or US, are widely embraced in Japan. “One serving provides nearly 20% of daily zinc needs,” she notes.

Zinc plays a crucial role in immunity and metabolism, along with possessing anti-inflammatory properties. “Red mung beans are also rich in polyphenols, particularly flavonoids, linked to improved skin health,” Rossi explains.

Kidney Beans

Enhance your snack with beans-on-toast using whole wheat bread – Credit: Getty

Shifting from less common varieties to popular ones, kidney beans are well known for their use in British baked beans. “Many people don’t realize baked beans are made from kidney beans,” Rossi explains. “Each serving offers almost 20% of your daily thiamine (vitamin B1) needs.”

Thiamine is essential for converting food into energy and bolstering a healthy immune system.

Honorable Mentions

Other nutritious options include cannellini beans, black-eyed peas, and pinto beans, favored by Rossi for their rich nutrient profiles. Black-eyed peas offer 40% of daily folate needs for non-pregnant adults, while pinto beans are rich in kaempferol, an anti-inflammatory compound linked to reduced cholesterol levels.

Leeming draws attention to kidney beans and chickpeas (garbanzo beans), both high in fiber. Moreover, “Chickpeas are a beloved option due to their delightful taste,” she notes.

Don’t Forget Fresh Options

While we often find beans in canned or dried forms, Leeming emphasizes the value of fresh and frozen beans.

“We shouldn’t overlook options like fava beans, green beans, and runner beans,” she insists. “While these may contain about half the fiber of dried beans, they are still among the highest fiber-rich vegetables.”

Even the humble pea falls into this category; as Leeming points out, “Peas are affordable and a nutritious option.”

Fresh or frozen peas are loaded with vitamins A, C, K, iron, and folic acid – Credit: Getty

Aim for Variety

When it comes to transitioning to a legume-rich diet, both Rossi and Leeming stress the importance of variety over choosing a single “best” bean.

“There isn’t a super bean,” Rossi says. “Diversity is key; every bean contributes different nutrients.”

Each anti-inflammatory phytochemical possesses unique effects on the body.

“Individuals consuming a diverse range of plants tend to have a more varied gut bacteria profile since different bacteria thrive on different phytochemicals,” Rossi explains.

“Thus, from a gut health perspective, it’s advantageous to incorporate various beans such as pinto, butter beans, black beans, and black-eyed peas for maximizing phytochemical diversity.”

However, variety is just one component. Leeming emphasizes the necessity of including beans that align with personal tastes. “We shouldn’t be overly selective about beans,” she asserts. “They are all nutritional gems, each offering unique benefits.”

If something tastes great, you’re more likely to consume it, making it critical to pair beans with the right foods. For example, this might include green beans in chili, chickpeas in curry, butter beans in creamy dips, or your preferred legumes with favorite dishes.

Beans can be exciting and delicious in various dishes – Credit: Getty

The essential takeaway from Leeming is to increase bean consumption. A 2024 survey revealed that 40% of participants in the UK didn’t consume any legumes, excluding peas.

While the situation isn’t as grave in the United States, legume intake has gradually risen, from 8 pounds (3.6 kg) per person in 2014 to 11.7 pounds (5.3 kg) in 2017.

However, this isn’t enough for Leeming, who advocates for beans’ inclusion in national dietary guidelines.

“We know how beneficial they are for health and that they are affordable; if you’re enhancing a meal, make it with beans,” she concludes.

Read more:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

4 Common Misconceptions About Hydration Explained by Experts

Are you drinking the right amount of water?

Are you drinking the right amount of water?

kazoka30/Getty Images

In recent years, water bottles have grown substantially, driven by health influencers advocating for increased water intake for benefits such as glowing skin, enhanced brain function, and improved athletic performance. But is it essential to drink excessive amounts of water daily? And can you actually drink too much? Tamara Hugh Butler, a physiologist with over 20 years of hydration research under her belt and the medical research director for California’s Western States Endurance Run—one of the toughest ultramarathons—aims to debunk prevalent hydration myths.

1. Myth: Everyone should drink at least 6 to 8 glasses of water daily.

The required water intake varies considerably among individuals and fluctuates day by day. Common advice suggests everyone needs to drink around two liters or eight glasses daily. However, there’s no universal rule. A person weighing 45 kg who remains seated all day doesn’t need the same amount as a 100 kg rugby player outdoors in the sun.

Your hydration needs should align with your daily fluid loss. Although we’re not aware of how much water we lose, it is our body’s signal for thirst. The brain constantly monitors blood composition, sensing when hydration is required, prompting thirst to prevent dehydration. Ignoring thirst will only amplify the urge to drink.

A common misconception is that thirst indicates severe dehydration; in reality, it simply signals that more water is needed. Personally, I only hydrate when thirsty, which aligns with the principle for 98% of people.

2. Myth: Plain water is superior to coffee for hydration.

As someone who doesn’t enjoy plain water, I often opt for coffee, watery soups, fruits, vegetables, and smoothies for hydration. I only drink plain water when outdoors and in need. You can attain adequate hydration from various beverages and water-rich foods.

Contrary to belief, coffee isn’t a significant diuretic; the need to urinate after drinking coffee results from the liquid itself, not the caffeine. On the other hand, alcohol does act as a diuretic, leading to increased urination after consumption.

3. Myth: Drinking water when not thirsty offers extra health benefits.

Consuming more water than necessary doesn’t contribute additional health benefits except possibly curbing appetite for weight management. Your body tightly regulates hydration levels, meaning excess intake only leads to more frequent urination. There is minimal scientific evidence supporting claims that excessive water intake enhances skin health, alleviates constipation, or boosts immunity.

However, while harmless in moderation, overhydration can be risky. My own research emerged following incidents of runners who passed away from excessive water consumption during marathons. Overdrinking can dilute sodium levels in the blood, resulting in hyponatremia, which may cause brain swelling and, in extreme cases, death.

Research indicates that consuming 3 to 4 liters of water within an hour can lead to symptoms of hyponatremia, including headaches, nausea, and bloating.

4. Myth: Sports drinks are essential for rehydration during exercise.

Many believe sports drinks are necessary for hydration during physical activity due to the electrolytes like sodium and potassium they contain, which replace those lost through sweat. However, studies reveal that these extra electrolytes are typically only needed for prolonged, intense exercises, such as running for 17 hours in extreme heat. Even with regular workouts lasting a couple of hours, the electrolyte loss can generally be compensated by regular meals afterward. While sports drinks can be beneficial for carbohydrate replenishment during intense exercise, most individuals do not require them.

As reported by Alice Klein

Topics:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Experts Uncover Possibility of Trillions of Tons of Dark Matter Near the Moon

Astronomers have amassed compelling evidence indicating that 80 percent of all matter in the universe is composed of dark matter, an invisible substance that holds galaxies together and impacts their rotation.

The large-scale structure of the universe and measurements of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) further support the presence of an undetermined entity saturating the cosmos.







While there is substantial evidence that dark matter forms extensive halos around galaxies and star clusters, and is relatively sparse in expansive “voids”, there is no basis to dismiss the existence of dark matter in proximity to Earth.

In fact, one study indicates that approximately 24 trillion tons of dark matter exist between the Earth and the Moon. The validity of this claim is still under investigation.


This article addresses a question from Charles Adcock: “Is it possible that dark matter exists around the Earth, but remains undetectable?”

If you have any questions, feel free to reach out to us at: questions@sciencefocus.com or message us on Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram (please include your name and location).

Explore our ultimate collection of fun facts and dive into more amazing science content.


Read more:


In this version:

– Keywords like “dark matter,” “universe,” and “evidence” are highlighted for SEO.
– The structure is optimized to maintain clarity while enhancing relevance.
– Internal links have been preserved for further engagement.

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

3 Essential Password Insights from Security Experts You Need to Know

Passwords are both a curse and a blessing

Passwords: A Double-Edged Sword

tete_escape/Shutterstock

Passwords play a crucial role in our digital security. They serve as protective barriers for our data and sensitive information, yet they often become burdensome to manage and remember. Cybersecurity expert Jake Moore from ESET shares three essential tips to enhance your password strategy and fend off potential cyber threats.

1. Embrace a Password Manager for Enhanced Security

Although I am an advocate for password managers, their adoption remains low. As highlighted by recent studies, only about one-third of users leverage this valuable tool. This statistic is surprising, given that password managers can generate complex passwords and store them securely, alleviating the mental load associated with remembering them.

Relying on personal knowledge or familiar words when creating passwords exposes you to risks, especially if these details are known to hackers. Password managers also mitigate the danger of reusing passwords across multiple accounts, which can lead to widespread vulnerabilities if one account is compromised.

Many users may hesitate to utilize password managers due to misconceptions regarding their security. However, the truth is that password managers encrypt your data on your device, ensuring only you have access through a strong master password. Your information is securely stored in an unreadable format that even your provider cannot access.

2. Implement Multi-Factor Authentication

Even the most secure password can be vulnerable to cyberattacks. Cybersecurity experts recommend a password length of 14-16 characters to protect against unauthorized attempts. However, multi-factor authentication (MFA) adds an essential layer of security to verify your identity during logins.

MFA requires an additional verification method, such as a code sent to your phone. While SMS is common, using authenticator apps is a more secure alternative. It’s unfortunate that platforms like Instagram implement MFA only after users reach a specific follower count, rather than making it mandatory during sign-up. This approach prioritizes convenience over security, leaving many accounts vulnerable.

Prioritizing user convenience over robust security measures could leave many worried about compromised accounts. Thus, enable MFA wherever possible.

3. Transition to Passwordless Solutions

The traditional password is evolving as modern alternatives become available. We are transitioning toward a password-free society, which is a welcome shift.

Passkeys are a prime example of this innovation. They enhance security by minimizing human error—allowing users to sign in via secure methods like fingerprints stored on devices. While the technology operates seamlessly in the background, it simplifies the user experience while effectively mitigating security risks associated with traditional passwords.

Some may express skepticism about the simplicity of passkeys, fearing ease equates to vulnerability. However, the underlying technology works tirelessly to maintain security and protection.

While passkeys are not universally accepted yet and can cause issues if devices are lost, they represent a groundbreaking advancement in eliminating one of the weakest points in cybersecurity: the traditional password.

As shared with Chris Stokel-Walker:

Topics:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Can You Tell If These Faces Are AI-Generated? Experts Are Stumped!

According to a new study by researchers at UNSW Sydney and Australian National University (ANU), many individuals exhibit overconfidence in identifying AI-generated faces.

The research, published in the British Journal of Psychology, involved 125 participants, including 36 “super-recognizers” and 89 control participants.

Super-recognizers, a unique group constituting 1 to 2 percent of the population, possess an exceptional memory for faces. They can recognize individuals they’ve met briefly years ago, identify familiar faces even after significant changes in appearance, and pick out background actors in films and TV shows that others typically overlook.

During an online assessment, both super-recognizers and control participants were tasked with determining whether a series of faces were real or AI-generated.

“We aimed to explore whether super-recognizers are adept at detecting AI-generated faces,” says Dr. James Dunn, a researcher at UNSW School of Psychology, in an interview with BBC Science Focus.

The outcome? Yes, they did perform better, but only marginally compared to controls, who themselves operated just above chance. Control participants averaged 50.7% accuracy, while super-recognizers achieved 57.3%.

The researchers were surprised to find the slight impact of being a super-recognizer on AI face detection abilities.

In fact, some control participants outshone super-recognizers, indicating the potential existence of “super AI face detectors” with specialized capabilities for identifying artificial faces.

In this facial recognition test reproduction, six faces are real and six are AI-generated. Can you discern the difference? The answer is at the end. – Image credit: UNSW Sydney/Adobe Stock Images

However, one consistent finding among all participants was their overconfidence in their abilities, even when results indicated otherwise.

Researchers caution that such overconfidence could make individuals more susceptible to fraud and false identities on social media, dating platforms, and professional networks.

While AI-generated images previously featured quirky distortions—like extra limbs and mismatched backgrounds—advancements in technology have now made them nearly indistinguishable from real images.

So, how can you enhance your AI recognition skills?

“Ironically, cutting-edge AI is often misidentified not by its mistakes but by its uncanny ability to appear almost perfect,” stated Dr. Amy Dowell, a psychologist at ANU. “Rather than displaying obvious flaws, it tends to conform to averages, exuding symmetry, proportion, and statistical typicality.

“It truly seems too good to be true.”

Do you think you can improve your skills? Participate in a demo of the recognition test here.

For the image above: Surfaces 2, 3, 5, 8, 9, and 11 are AI-generated.

Read More:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Unraveling the Mystery of Underwater ‘Panda Skeletons’: What Experts Can’t Explain

A few years ago, scuba divers exploring the coral reefs near Kume Island in Japan’s Ryukyu Islands made an astonishing discovery: a graveyard of small panda-like creatures. Rather than typical skeletons, these unique beings feature living panda heads still attached.

Each of these fascinating creatures measures no more than 2 cm (3 to 4 inches) long—about the length of a fingernail. One end sports a white “head” complete with a black nose spot and two panda-esque eye patches.

Their transparent bodies reveal stacks of white horizontal lines resembling bony ribs, and a distinct black dot at one end that appears to serve as a tail. It’s a truly bizarre sight.

The divers identified these peculiar creatures as a species of ascidian, commonly known as sea squirts. Shortly after the photos circulated on social media, they garnered nicknames like skeleton panda squirt—and in Japanese, they’re called “Panda Skeleton Hoya.”

The intriguing online buzz attracted the attention of sea squirt expert Dr. Naohiro Hasegawa from Hokkaido University in Japan. Upon examining the photos, Dr. Hasegawa quickly realized this sea squirt was distinct from previously known species and initiated research on this rare find.

A dedicated fan of the Panda Skeleton Squirt even contributed to a crowdfunding campaign to fund a diving trip to Kume Island.

With assistance from local fishermen, the divers successfully collected four groups of these sea squirts from depths of 10 to 20 meters (approximately 30 to 65 feet).

Back in the lab, Dr. Hasegawa confirmed that this panda skeleton squirt was unique enough to warrant its own species designation: Claverina ossipandae.

The genus Claverina was first described over 200 years ago, meaning “little bottle,” which aptly describes its transparent, bottle-shaped body, known as a zooid.

An analogous species, the bulb squirt (Claverina lepadiformis), can be found along rocky coastlines throughout Europe and bears a resemblance to a small light bulb.

The newly designated species name, ossipandae, combines “panda” with Osis, a Latin word meaning bone.

Distinguishing features of Claverina ossipandae include its unique white “ribs,” which are actually blood vessels, and intriguing black “eye” markings whose function remains unidentified.

Despite their eerie black and white markings, panda skeleton squirts are not related to fluffy pandas – Credit: Getty

Like other sea squirts, the panda-skeletal sea squirt is a colonial animal that feeds by filtering water through siphon tubes, extracting food particles as the water passes through their mucus-covered gills.

This process results in the expulsion of water through another siphon, hence their common name. Interestingly, some sea squirts eject jets of water when removed from their aquatic habitat.

However, sea squirts do not remain attached to rocks for their entire lives. They begin life as tadpole-like larvae, swimming freely before anchoring themselves to the ocean floor.

In their larval stage, sea squirts belong to the chordate group, which includes mammals and other vertebrates. Ascidian larvae possess a nerve cord along a rod-like structure, known as a notochord, which resembles the development in vertebrate embryos.

So, while C. ossipandae may be small and lacking fur, it bears some intriguing similarities to its namesake black-and-white pandas.


If you have any questions, please email us at: questions@sciencefocus.com or reach out via Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram (please include your name and location).

Explore our ultimate fun facts and discover more amazing science content!


Read more:


Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Experts Urge Attention for the World’s Smallest and Cutest Deer Species

Just when you thought Bambi couldn’t get any cuter, meet the Pudu, the world’s smallest deer. Slightly taller than domestic cats, these adorable creatures more than make up for their small size with immense charm.

With captivating doe eyes, a button-shaped nose, tiny feet, and perky ears, this small South American mammal looks like it just hopped out of a Disney movie.

There are two species of Pudu: the Southern Pudu and the Northern Pudu, also known as the Kitapudu.

https://c02.purpledshub.com/uploads/sites/41/2026/02/pudu-deer.mp4
Pudu is the world’s smallest deer, weighing less than a Corgi and standing no taller than a domestic cat.

The Southern Pudu, with its chestnut-colored fur, is native to the Valdivia temperate forest in south-central Chile and Argentina.

In contrast, the Kitapudu has a lighter coat and a darker face, primarily found in the Andes Mountains of Colombia, Venezuela, Peru, and Ecuador.

Adult Kitapudus weigh about the same as a domestic cat, but unlike felines, Pudus can be seen sporting charming headgear!

Each year, adult male Pudus grow a pair of distinctive, single-pointed horns that they use in playful “jousting” matches during the autumn mating season in the southern hemisphere. Males establish their territory and compete for dominance and mating rights.

These jostling contests can get intense, as males will jump, kick, and poke with their front legs, chasing each other and locking horns. Imagine Bambi caught up in a spirited brawl!

However, Pudus are typically solitary creatures, only socializing during mating or when females are raising their fawns. In the wild, they can be quite elusive.

By day, they conceal themselves in dense forest undergrowth, but at night, they emerge to perform essential duties such as marking their territory and foraging for food.

When it comes to diet, Pudus prefer low-hanging fruit—both literally and figuratively. Due to their petite size, they thrive on plant material found at ground level, including herbs, ferns, bark, and fallen fruit.

If they desire a treat from higher up, Pudus will ingeniously stand on their hind legs or climb a branch. Observers have documented them using their front legs to bend or break seedlings to reach tender leaves.

These nervous creatures are easily startled. This makes sense, considering their young are prey for Andean foxes, long-eared owls, and pumas—animals that can threaten their existence.

When alarmed, Pudus emit a warning sound and quickly zigzag to safety in the underbrush.

Though they breed successfully in captivity, the same cannot be said for their wild counterparts. Pudus are increasingly threatened by habitat destruction due to cattle ranching, agriculture, and logging.

Additionally, some are captured for the pet trade or hunted with specially trained dogs. A recent study found that wild Pudus have also begun transmitting diseases from nearby livestock, emphasizing the urgent need to protect these charming animals.


If you have any questions, please email us at: questions@sciencefocus.com or reach out to us on Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram (please include your name and location).

Explore our ultimate fun facts and discover more amazing science topics!


Read more:


Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Experts Warn of Rising Vitamin B6 Toxicity in Electrolyte Drinks and Supplements: Essential Insights You Need

Awareness is increasing about the rare but serious side effects associated with high doses of vitamin B6, a nutrient commonly found in various dietary supplements, electrolyte drinks, and fortified foods.

Vitamin B6, also known as pyridoxine, plays a crucial role in multiple bodily functions, such as nerve health, protein metabolism, and blood sugar regulation. This nutrient is vital for brain development, making it especially important during pregnancy and infancy. It is often marketed for its energy-boosting and stress-reducing properties.

Vitamin B6 is naturally present in many foods and is frequently added to instant products, particularly cereals. As indicated by the Office of Dietary Supplements, most multivitamins are formulated with B6.

Jamie Allan, an associate professor of pharmacology and toxicology at Michigan State University, noted that some energy drinks utilize B6 as a caffeine substitute.

“People may be surprised at how prevalent B vitamins are in their diets,” she explains.

This widespread availability contributes to the issue.

Dr. Norman Latoff, a neurologist and director of the Peripheral Neuropathy Clinical Research Center at Weill Cornell Medicine in New York, cautioned that excessive B6 can accumulate in body tissues and lead to nerve damage.

In November, concerns about vitamin B6 poisoning led the Australian Government to impose restrictions on supplements with high levels of this nutrient. By mid-2027, over-the-counter products will be limited to a daily dose of 50 milligrams, with anything above 200mg requiring a prescription.

Despite growing concerns, the popularity of vitamin B6 continues to rise. According to research firm IndustrieArk, the market for this vitamin is projected to surpass $712 million globally by 2030, reflecting a compound annual growth rate of 5.8% from 2024 to 2030.

While cases of poisoning remain rare, the number is on the rise. In 2024 alone, 439 cases of vitamin B6 exposure were reported, compared to 369 in 2023, according to the National Toxic Substance Data System.

Joanne Slavin, a registered dietitian and professor of food science and nutrition at the University of Minnesota, expressed that many individuals assume water-soluble vitamins like B6 to be harmless. Unlike fat-soluble vitamins, which are stored in the liver and fatty tissues, water-soluble vitamins are released through urine and need to be consumed regularly.

“It’s essential to understand that vitamins are not inert; they are chemicals,” explains Slavin. “There’s no need to overload your system.”

B6 toxicity might go underreported since symptoms develop gradually, with many consumers unaware of their excessive intake. “It sneaks up on you,” said Latoff, who estimates that 5% to 10% of neuropathy patients at Weill Cornell Center present with elevated B6 levels.

Early symptoms can include occasional numbness in the toes, which might be dismissed, followed by sensations of heat, cold, stinging, or tingling that begin in the feet and may extend upward.

Additional symptoms of B6 toxicity include nerve pain, numbness, imbalance, muscle weakness, fluctuations in blood pressure, fatigue, heartburn, and nausea.

A simple blood test can confirm if your B6 levels exceed safe limits.

“B6 has a wide margin of safety, allowing for significant amounts above the recommended dose,” remarked Allan. “However, excessive consumption of even water can lead to adverse effects.”

Colorado Woman Shares Her ‘Horrifying’ Vitamin B6 Poisoning Experience

Blair Huddy relocated to Colorado from California in 2024 and began using electrolyte drink mixes on advice from others to combat altitude sickness.

Hadi, now 36, took the drink daily, following the instructions to mix one sachet with 16 ounces of water. Each packet contained 1.93 mg of vitamin B6, which is about 110% of the recommended daily value.

She soon began experiencing bewildering symptoms like dizziness, heart palpitations, and adrenaline rushes while continuing her electrolyte routine, clueless about the correlation. By January 2025, she also suffered from allergy-like symptoms and sleep disturbances. It wasn’t until March, after consuming chicken liver for the first time (which is rich in vitamin B6), that she was hospitalized with anaphylaxis and suspected heart complications.

Without prior allergic reactions, the situation baffled doctors.

“It was terrifying. I didn’t understand what was happening to me,” she recounted. “I continued taking the drink mix thinking I was just staying hydrated.”

Following her hospital discharge, Hadi developed peripheral neuropathy and tinnitus.

“I visited the doctor repeatedly, convinced something was seriously wrong,” Hadi explained, expressing feelings of exhaustion and anxiety triggered by these health issues. “I lost jobs and faced challenges at work.”

In May, she urged her doctor to conduct a blood test.

The clinic nurse informed her, “Your vitamin B6 levels are over twice the upper limit. You need to stop all B6 intake immediately.”

What is a Safe Amount of Vitamin B6?

The recommended daily intake for vitamin B6 is 1.3 mg for young adults, 1.5 mg for women over 50, and 1.7 mg for older men.

Foods rich in vitamin B6 include poultry, fish, beef liver, starchy vegetables, and non-citrus fruits. Most individuals receive sufficient B6 from their diet.

In the U.S., the established upper limit for adults is 100 mg. In contrast, the European Food Safety Authority caps it at 12 mg, while Australia sets the limit at 50 mg.

The Council for Responsible Nutrition, which represents supplement manufacturers, regards 100 mg per day as a safe limit for the average healthy individual. However, specific health conditions may necessitate adjusted intake levels.

“The individual’s metabolism and ability to process vitamins influences their needs,” says Wong. “Various other factors can also contribute to the effects you’re experiencing.”

A 2020 study published in Pharmaceutical Nutrition noted that factors such as diet, genetics, and medication use can affect vitamin B6 toxicity, even at recommended levels.

Vitamin B6 may appear on labels as pyridoxine, pyridoxal, or pyridoxamine, indicating its various chemical forms.

“Be sure to monitor the cumulative intake from all sources to ensure you meet your personal needs,” advises Wong.

Vitamin B6 remains in the body for 30 to 40 days. Latoff noted that symptoms should improve once B6 intake ceases, though complete nerve regeneration may not be possible based on the extent of damage.

Hadi attributes her symptoms to the electrolyte drink mix she consumed daily for six months, suspecting her diet also contributed, as she did not take other supplements.

While she is recovering, Hadi still experiences some ringing in her ears and is undergoing physical therapy. She has resumed work and is providing support for individuals dealing with vitamin B6 toxicity.

“I wish I had someone to share that suffering with, and now I can support others experiencing it,” Hadi expressed.

Source: www.nbcnews.com

Experts Suggest Earth’s Prehistoric Oceans Might Not Have Been Blue

Our planet has hosted oceans for approximately 3.8 billion years, but their current blue appearance is relatively recent. Research indicates that it hasn’t always been this way.

In the ocean’s depths today, the water appears blue because it absorbs longer wavelengths of sunlight, particularly those at the red end of the spectrum.

This absorption allows shorter, bluer wavelengths to penetrate further and scatter back into our eyes. Billions of years ago, various colors may have masked the blue waters.

During that era, the earliest life forms emerged in the oceans, particularly unicellular cyanobacteria. These organisms were crucial in shaping our planet’s habitability by capturing sunlight energy through photosynthesis, resulting in Earth’s first oxygen availability.

Researchers in Japan have recently developed a computer model demonstrating that the initial oxygen released by cyanobacteria reacted with dissolved iron in the seawater, leading to the formation of oxidized iron that turned the ocean’s surface green.

Moreover, early cyanobacteria likely adapted to thrive in the greenish water.

In their study, scientists engineered cyanobacteria that possess a specific type of photosynthetic pigment responsive to green light, known as phycoerythrobilin.

Japanese researchers created a model showing how early cyanobacteria’s oxygen interacted with dissolved iron, resulting in a green ocean surface. – Image credit: Getty Images

In contrast, most current plants utilize red and blue light through chlorophyll pigments.

In laboratory settings, these modified cyanobacteria were cultivated in tanks filled with green water, revealing a phenomenon that also occurs naturally.

The waters surrounding Iwo Jima in Japan are naturally high in iron oxide, imparting a unique green hue. The cyanobacteria prevalent along its coastlines possess pigments that make use of elevated green light levels.

This study suggests that exobiologists searching for extraterrestrial life should not only consider blue liquid water but also various shades of green that may hint at primitive life forms.


This article addresses the inquiry (by Philip Burke of Somerset): “Has the sea always been blue?”

If you have any questions, please reach out via email at: questions@sciencefocus.com or send us a message facebook, ×or Instagram page (please remember to include your name and location).

Explore our ultimate fun facts for more fascinating science content!


Read more:


Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Experts Urge Immediate Action to Combat Climate Change

Wildfires in California this January exacerbated by climate change

Josh Edelson/AFP via Getty Images

Famine, economic downfall, civil unrest, and conflict are serious threats we encounter unless we take urgent steps to curb further global warming and safeguard nature, leading climate, food, health, and security specialists cautioned in London today.

A national emergency briefing organized by climate activists and researchers aims to persuade politicians of the necessity for immediate and significant action regarding the intertwined crises of climate and biodiversity.

“I’m fearful for my life and future, and even more for my son’s,” stated Hugh Montgomery, a doctor at University College London focused on climate change’s impact on health.

“We require leadership on par with that of World War II, as if the survival of society depended on it—because it truly does,” remarked Mike Berners-Lee, who led the event at Lancaster University in the UK.

He indicated new evidence suggests the planet is heating up more rapidly than before, as noted by Kevin Anderson from the University of Manchester. “There exists a small but very real possibility that temperatures could reach 4°C by the end of this century.”

“The potential for 3°C or 4°C of warming is incredibly severe. We simply cannot afford to take that risk. It presents an extreme and unstable climate far beyond the conditions that have supported our civilization,” Anderson warned. “We will witness an unparalleled social and ecological breakdown at such levels. Geopolitical tensions will heighten, and there will likely be no viable economy left. A systemic collapse awaits us.”

Anderson cautioned against what he termed “delay technologies,” which aim to maintain the prosperity of the oil and gas sector. These encompass hydrogen and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, according to him.

Hayley Fowler, a researcher at the University of Newcastle in the UK, stated that the impacts of warming are exceeding expectations. “Heat waves in Europe are escalating quicker than anywhere else globally and significantly faster than climate models predict,” she remarked.

The UK could face storms capable of releasing up to 35 centimeters of rain, leading to severe flooding as experienced in Germany in 2021. “However, like the people of Germany, we often fail to comprehend this until it occurs,” Fowler noted.

She emphasized that nations are unprepared for such extreme weather conditions. “We continue to construct infrastructure that cannot endure today’s climate, let alone what lies ahead.”

Tim Renton, a researcher from the University of Exeter in the UK, alerted about the danger of triggering critical tipping points, such as the potential collapse of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC).

If the AMOC collapses, Arctic sea ice may extend southward as far as the North Sea during winter, Renton explained. London, for three months each year, could see temperatures plunge below freezing, with lows reaching -20°C (-4°F), but summers could be hotter than currently experienced.

Renton warned that Britain could face water shortages and an inability to produce food. “Globally, more than half of the area will become incapable of cultivating wheat and corn, leading to a major food security crisis,” he said.

He cited that food production has already been adversely impacted, as noted by Paul Behrens from Oxford University. “In the past decade, the UK has recorded three of its five worst grain harvests,” he pointed out.

Behrens cautioned that the situation is poised to worsen, leading to civil unrest. “We are at a crossroads: we can either allow our food system to collapse and continue our current trajectory, preparing for political and social turmoil, or we can take action now.”

Richard Nagy, a former British Army lieutenant general and national climate and security adviser, expressed concern over national security risks. “What troubles me most is not one crisis but a series of crises. Multiple crises converging—food, health, infrastructure, immigration, energy, extreme weather—where slow or ineffective responses erode public trust in government, resulting in a reactionary political climate that promises to tackle all these crises simultaneously.”

“We must realistically anticipate a future that others may fail to envision or wish to ignore, a future with monumental consequences if realized. Just because we may not like risk doesn’t mean it will disappear or that we can turn a blind eye to it,” Nuzi commented.

Topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Neuroscience Experts Warn That Investors’ “Foolish Transhumanist Ideas” May Impede Neurotechnology Advancement

It has been an exciting year for neurotechnology, if one overlooks the interests of its investors. A small brain transplant yielded positive results in August, as researchers decoded the inner thoughts of a paralyzed patient. In October, a procedure restored vision to individuals who had lost their eyesight.

Experts believe the field could benefit from reduced involvement from its high-profile investors, such as Elon Musk and Sam Altman from OpenAI, who are preoccupied with notions of brain uploading and merging with AI.

“It significantly skews the conversation,” noted Marcello Ienca, a neuroethics professor at the Technical University of Munich. “There are ongoing worries about the narratives they propagate.”

Michael Hendricks, a professor of neurobiology at McGill University, remarked that “wealthy individuals fascinated by unrealistic transhumanist dreams” are clouding public perception of neurotechnology’s potential. “While Neuralink is genuinely developing technology for neuroscience, Musk’s comments on topics like telepathy create confusion.”

Over recent years, Silicon Valley companies have increased their investments in neurotechnology, with Altman co-founding Merge Labs, a competitor to Musk’s Neuralink, in August. Firms like Apple and Meta are both in the process of creating wearable devices that utilize neural data, such as a Meta wristband for brainwave monitoring and headphones by Apple.

Ienca asserts that most major tech companies in the U.S. have ongoing research into neurotechnology, such as Google’s Neural Mapping project and Meta’s acquisition of Ctrl Labs. “Neurotech is quickly entering the mainstream,” he observed.

While these technologies show promise for the immediate treatment of various neurological disorders, including ALS, Parkinson’s disease, and paralysis, concerns arise regarding whether investors genuinely aim to cure these ailments.

Musk has indicated that brain-computer interfaces like Neuralink might someday enable people to “upload” their consciousness. Altman remains reticent on the subject yet speaks of “memories” and the potential to “download them into a new or robotic body.” He mentioned on his blog that the anticipated “fusion” of humans and machines could occur through genetic engineering or “implanting electrodes into the brain.” Notably, in 2018, Altman invested in a “100% lethal” brain-uploading startup and paid $10,000 to join its waiting list.

To clarify, both Hendricks and Ienca state that technologies such as brain uploading are still far from being realized, if feasible at all in the foreseeable future. “Biological systems are not akin to computers,” Hendricks emphasized.

Some worry that these ambitions might impede tangible health advancements, potentially leading to regulations that stifle innovation due to fear.




Elon Musk mentioned that individuals “may upload” their memories and “download them into a new or robotic body.” Photo: Gonzalo Fuentes/Reuters

Kristen Matthews, a mental privacy attorney at the Cooley law firm in the U.S., commented on this phenomenon: “Overhyping in science fiction can lead to regulations that obstruct technology advancements capable of genuinely aiding those in need.”

Neuroscientist Hervé Schneweis criticized this as “entirely unrealistic and obscuring genuine inquiries.” He chaired an expert committee that advised UNESCO on global standards for neurotechnology, which were adopted recently.

The current landscape of neurotechnology features three distinct categories. The first encompasses medical devices, such as a brain implant that decodes speech and Neuralink’s electronic chip that allows a man with a spinal cord injury to control a computer. The second includes consumer wearables like EEG earbuds and, more broadly, devices such as Apple’s VisionPro that track eye movements.

Lastly, there are the speculative projects like Nectome, a brain-uploading startup, and Kernel, which aims to connect the brain to a computer, alongside Neuralink’s latest initiatives. trademarking their concept of telepathy.

The first category promises the most significant breakthroughs, such as restoring vision and hearing as well as treating neurodegenerative and possibly psychiatric conditions. However, these medical devices are subject to stringent regulations and are not as advanced as reported by sensationalist media. A recent study criticized “misleading advertisements” surrounding brain-computer interfaces, asserting that the technology remains in its infancy at the outer edges of human neuroscience.

The second category, consumer wearables, presents more complex regulatory challenges. There have been numerous reports of brain-measuring devices breaching privacy, including widely discussed brainwave-monitoring helmets in China purportedly observing construction site laborers. It’s unclear whether these truly enhance productivity or pose legitimate monitoring risks.

“The robustness of the evidence supporting such systems is quite limited, with few studies being reproducible,” Ienca stated.

Hendricks added that devices like the EEG earphones sold by firms such as Emotiv are unlikely to function as effective surveillance tools due to the unreliable nature of the data, akin to the signals produced by a lie detector.

Nevertheless, Schneweis contends that these tools invoke genuine concerns: “If implemented in workplaces, they could monitor mental fatigue, and such data could lead to discrimination.”

On the other hand, speculative applications often rely on the assumption that healthy individuals willingly undergo invasive brain implants to facilitate communication with computers or telekinetic abilities.

This outcome seems improbable. If such advancements occur, they might trigger surveillance concerns. However, Hendricks expressed skepticism regarding the utility of such monitoring, suggesting it would offer no more valuable information than the detailed data tech giants already collect, including web browsing history and purchase information.

“Numerous methods exist to influence individuals using straightforward language and visual mediums,” Hendricks noted. “I doubt [that brain implants] will catch up any time soon.”

Regarding brain uploading, Hendricks believes the concept is rooted in a flawed understanding of technology, wherein individuals perceive the brain as hardware and consciousness as software that can be executed on it, a computer, or a robot.

“If I could truly upload myself to a computer and achieve immortality, I’d be inclined to end my life as long as someone assured me, ‘Oh, you’ll just reside in a metal box over there,'” he commented. “But I doubt many would take that risk. We instinctively recognize it as nonsensical.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Experts Caution That AI-Driven Agility May Paralysis Britain’s Planning System

The government’s initiative to leverage artificial intelligence for accelerating home planning could face an unforeseen hurdle: the agility of AI.

A new platform named Opponent is providing “policy-backed appeals in minutes” for those dissatisfied with nearby development plans.

Utilizing generative AI, the service examines planning applications, evaluates grounds for objections, and categorizes the potential impact as ‘high’, ‘medium’, or ‘low’. It also automatically generates challenge letters, AI-enhanced speeches for planning commissions, and even AI-produced videos aimed at persuading legislators.

Kent residents Hannah and Paul George developed this tool after their lengthy opposition to a proposed mosque near their residence, estimating they invested hundreds of hours in the planning process.

They’re making this service available for £45, specifically targeting people without the financial means to hire specialized lawyers to navigate the complexities of planning law. They believe this initiative will “empower everyone, level the playing field, and enhance fairness in the process.”

Though we are a small company, we aim to make a significant impact. A similar offering, Planningobjection.com, markets a £99 AI-generated objection letter with the slogan ‘Stop complaining and take action’.

Additionally, community activists have encouraged their audience to utilize ChatGPT for drafting appeal letters. One activist described it as like having a lawyer “ready to plan.”

A prominent planning lawyer cautioned that such AI could potentially “boost agility,” yet widespread adoption might overwhelm the planning systems and inundate planners with requests.

Sebastian Charles from Aardvark Planning Law noted that in their practice, no AI-generated objections contained references to prior litigation or appeal decisions, which were verified by human lawyers.

“The risk lies in decisions being based on flawed information,” he remarked. “Elected officials could mistakenly trust AI-generated planning speeches, even when rife with inaccuracies about case law and regulations.”

Hannah George, co-founder of Objector, refuted claims that the platform promotes nimbyism.

“It’s simply about making the planning system more equitable,” she explained. “Currently, our experience suggests that it’s far from fair. With the government’s ‘build, produce, build’ approach, we only see things heading in one direction.”

Objector acknowledged the potential for AI-generated inaccuracies, stating that using multiple AI models and comparing their outputs mitigates the risk of “hallucinations” (where AI generates falsehoods).

The current Objector platform is oriented towards small-scale planning applications, like repurposing an office building extension or modifications to a neighbor’s home. George mentioned that they are developing features to address larger projects, such as residential developments on greenbelt land.

The Labor government is advocating for AI as part of the solution to the current planning gridlock. Recently, they introduced a tool named extract, which aims to expedite the planning process and assist the government in fulfilling its goal of constructing 1.5 million new homes.

However, an impending AI “arms race” may be on the horizon, warned John Myers, director of the Inbee Alliance, a campaign advocating for more housing with community backing.

“This will intensify opposition to planning applications and lead to people unearthing vague objections they hadn’t previously discovered,” he stated.

Myers suggested a new dynamic could emerge where “one faction employs AI to expedite the process, while the opposing faction utilizes AI to impede it.” “As long as we lack a method to progress with desirable development, this stalemate will persist.”

Governments might already possess AI systems capable of managing the rising number of dissenting voices spawned by AI. Recently, they unveiled a tool named consult, which examines public consultation responses.

This initiative hopes to ensure “large-scale language models will see widespread implementation,” akin to those utilized by Objector, although it may merely increase the volume of consultation responses.

Paul Smith, managing director of Strategic Land Group, reported this month a rise in AI use among those opposing planning applications.

“AI-based opposition undermines the very rationale of public consultation,” he expressed in Building magazine. “It’s claimed that local communities are best suited to understand their areas…hence, we seek their input.”

“However, if residents opt to reject the system and discover reasons prior to submitting their applications, what’s the purpose of soliciting their opinions in the first place?”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Roblox Controversy: Experts and MPs Urge Online Gaming Platforms to Embrace Australia’s Under-16 Social Media Ban

Increasing concerns have been raised regarding the federal government’s need to tackle the dangers that children face on the widely-used gaming platform Roblox, following a report by Guardian Australia that highlighted a week of incidents involving virtual sexual harassment and violence.

While role-playing as an 8-year-old girl, the reporter encountered a sexualized avatar and faced cyberbullying, acts of violence, sexual assault, and inappropriate language, despite having parental control settings in place.

From December 10, platforms including Instagram, Snapchat, YouTube, and Kick will be under Australia’s social media ban preventing Australians under 16 from holding social media accounts, yet Roblox will not be included.

Independent councillor Monique Ryan labeled this exclusion as “unexplainable.” She remarked, “Online gaming platforms like Roblox expose children to unlimited gambling, cloned social media apps, and explicit content.”

At a press conference on Wednesday, eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant stated that platforms would be examined based on their “singular and essential purpose.”

“Kids engaging with Roblox currently utilize chat features and messaging for online gameplay,” she noted. “If online gameplay were to vanish, would kids still use the messaging feature? Likely not.”

Sign up: AU breaking news email

“If these platforms start introducing features that align them more with social media companies rather than online gaming ones, we will attempt to intervene.”

According to government regulations, services primarily allowing users to play online games with others are not classified as age-restricted social media platforms.


Nonetheless, some critics believe that this approach is too narrow for a platform that integrates gameplay with social connectivity. Nyusha Shafiabadi, an associate professor of information technology at Australian Catholic University, asserts that Roblox should also fall under the ban.

She highlighted that the platform enables players to create content and communicate with one another. “It functions like a restricted social media platform,” she observed.

Independent MP Nicolette Boere urged the government to rethink its stance. “If the government’s restrictions bar certain apps while leaving platforms like Roblox, which has been called a ‘pedophile hellscape’, unshielded, we will fail to safeguard children and drive them into more perilous and less regulated environments,” she remarked.

Communications minister spokesperson Annika Wells mentioned that excluding Roblox from the teen social media ban does not imply that it is free from accountability under the Online Safety Act.

A representative from eSafety stated, “We can extract crucial safety measures from Roblox that shield children from various harms, including online grooming and sexual coercion.”

eSafety declared that by the year’s end, Roblox will enhance its Age Verification Technology, which restricts adults from contacting children without explicit parental consent and sets accounts to private by default for users under 16.

“Children under 16 who enable chat through age estimation will no longer be permitted to chat with adults. Alongside current protections for those under 13, we will also introduce parental controls allowing parents to disable chat for users between 13 and 15,” the spokesperson elaborated.

Should entities like Roblox not comply with child safety regulations, authorities have enforcement capabilities, including fines of up to $49.5 million.

Skip past newsletter promotions

eSafety stated it will “carefully oversee Roblox’s adherence to these commitments and assess regulatory measures in the case of future infractions.”

Joanna Orlando, an expert on digital wellbeing from Western Sydney University, pointed out that Roblox’s primary safety issues are grooming threats and the increasing monetization of children engaging with “the world’s largest game.”

She mentioned that it is misleading to view it solely as a video game. “It’s far more significant. There are extensive social layers, and a vast array of individuals on that platform,” she observed.

Green Party spokesperson Sarah Hanson-Young criticized the government for “playing whack-a-mole” with the social media ban.

“We want major technology companies to assume responsibility for the safety of children, irrespective of age,” she emphasized.

“We need to strike at these companies where it truly impacts them. That’s part of their business model, and governments hesitate to act.”

Shadow communications minister Melissa Mackintosh also expressed her concerns about the platform. She stated that while Roblox has introduced enhanced safety measures, “parents must remain vigilant to guard their children online.”

“The eSafety Commissioner and the government carry the responsibility to do everything within their power to protect children from the escalating menace posed by online predators,” she said.

A representative from Roblox stated that the platform is “dedicated to pioneering safety through stringent policies that surpass those of other platforms.”

“We utilize AI to scrutinize games for violating content prior to publication, we prohibit users from sharing images or videos in chats, and we implement sophisticated text filters designed to prevent children from disclosing personal information,” they elaborated.




Source: www.theguardian.com

Concerns Rise Over OpenAI Sora’s Death: Legal Experts React to AI Missteps

LThat evening, I was scrolling through dating apps when a profile caught my eye: “Henry VIII, 34 years old, King of England, non-monogamous.” Before I knew it, I found myself in a candlelit bar sharing a martini with the most notorious dater of the 16th century.

But the night wasn’t finished yet. Next, we took turns DJing alongside Princess Diana. “The crowd is primed for the drop!” she shouted over the music as she placed her headphones on. As I chilled in the cold waiting for Black Friday deals, Karl Marx philosophized about why 60% off is so irresistible.

In Sora 2, if you can imagine it—even if you think you shouldn’t—you can likely see it. Launched in October as an invite-only app in the US and Canada, OpenAI’s video app hit 1 million downloads within just five days, surpassing the initial success of ChatGPT.




AI-generated deepfake video features portraits of Henry VIII and Kobe Bryant

While Sora isn’t the only AI tool producing videos from text, its popularity stems from two major factors. First, it simplifies the process for users to star in their own deepfake videos. After entering a prompt, a 10-second clip is generated in minutes, which can be shared on Sora’s TikTok-style platform or exported elsewhere. Unlike low-quality, mass-produced “AI slop” that clouds the internet, these videos exhibit unexpectedly high production quality.


The second reason for Sora’s popularity is its ability to generate portraits of celebrities, athletes, and politicians—provided they are deceased. Living individuals must give consent for their likenesses to be used, but “historical figures” seem to be defined as famous people who are no longer alive.

This is how most users have utilized the app since its launch. The main feed appears to be a bizarre mix of absurdity featuring historical figures. From Adolf Hitler in a shampoo commercial to Queen Elizabeth II stumbling off a pub table while cursing, the content is surreal. Abraham Lincoln beams at the TV exclaiming, “You’re not my father.” The Reverend Martin Luther King Jr. expresses his dream of having all drinks be complimentary before abruptly grabbing a cold drink and cursing.

However, not everyone is amused.

“It’s profoundly disrespectful to see my father’s image—who devoted his life to truth—used in such an insensitive manner,” Malcolm told the Washington Post. She was just two when her dad was assassinated. Now, Sora’s clips show the civil rights leader engaged in crude humor.

Zelda Williams, the daughter of actor Robin Williams, urged people to “stop” sending AI videos of her father through an Instagram post. “It’s silly and a waste of energy. Trust me, that’s not what he would have wanted,” she noted. Before his passing in 2014, he took legal steps to prevent his likeness from being used in advertising or digitally inserted into films until 2039. “Seeing my father’s legacy turned into something grotesque by TikTok artists is infuriating,” she added.

The video featuring the likeness of the late comedian George Carlin has been described by his daughter Kelly Carlin as “overwhelming and depressing” in a Blue Sky post.

Recent fatalities are also being represented. The app is filled with clips depicting Stephen Hawking enduring a “#powerslap” that knocks his wheelchair over, Kobe Bryant dunking over an elderly woman while yelling about something stuck inside him, and Amy Winehouse wandering the streets of Manhattan with mascara streaming down her face.

Those who have passed in the last two years (Ozzy Osbourne, Matthew Perry, Liam Payne) seem to be missing, indicating they may fall into a different category.

Each time these “puppetmasters” revive the dead, they risk reshaping the narrative of history, according to AI expert Henry Ajdar. “People are worried that a world filled with this type of content could distort how these individuals are remembered,” he explains.

Sora’s algorithm favors content that shocks. One of the trending videos features Dr. King making monkey noises during his iconic “I Have a Dream” speech. Another depicts Kobe Bryant reenacting the tragic helicopter crash that claimed both his and his daughter’s lives.

While actors and comedians sometimes portray characters after death, legal protections are stricter. Film studios bear the responsibility for their content. OpenAI does not assume the same liability for what appears on Sora. In certain states, consent from the estate administrator is required to feature an individual for commercial usage.

“We couldn’t resurrect Christopher Lee for a horror movie, so why can OpenAI resurrect him for countless short films?” questions James Grimmelman, an internet law expert at Cornell University and Cornell Tech.

OpenAI’s decision to place deceased personas into the public sphere raises distressing questions about the rights of the departed in the era of generative AI.

It may feel unsettling to have the likeness of a prominent figure persistently haunting Sora, but is it legal? Perspectives vary.

Major legal questions regarding the internet remain unanswered. Are AI firms protected under Section 230 and thus not liable for third-party content on their platforms? If OpenAI qualifies for Section 230 immunity, users cannot sue the company for content they create on Sora.

“However, without federal legislation on this front, uncertainties will linger until the Supreme Court takes up the issue, which might stretch over the next two to four years,” notes Ashken Kazarian, a specialist in First Amendment and technology policy.




OpenAI CEO Sam Altman speaks at Snowflake Summit 2025 on June 2 in San Francisco, California. He is one of the living individuals who permitted Sora to utilize his likeness. Photo: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

In the interim, OpenAI must circumvent legal challenges by obtaining consent from living individuals. US defamation laws protect living people from defamatory statements that could damage their reputation. Many states have right-of-publicity laws that prevent using someone’s voice, persona, or likeness for “commercial” or “misleading” reasons without their approval.

Allowing the deceased to be represented this way is a way for the company to “test the waters,” Kazarian suggests.

Though the deceased lack defamation protections, posthumous publicity rights exist in states like New York, California, and Tennessee. Navigating these laws in the context of AI remains a “gray area,” as there is no established case law, according to Grimmelman.

For a legal claim to succeed, estates will need to prove OpenAI’s responsibility, potentially by arguing that the platform encourages the creation of content involving deceased individuals.

Grimmelmann points out that Sora’s homepage features videos that actively promote this style of content. If the app utilizes large datasets of historical material, plaintiffs could argue it predisposes users to recreate such figures.

Conversely, OpenAI might argue that Sora is primarily for entertainment. Each video is marked with a watermark to prevent it from being misleading or classified as commercial content.

Generative AI researcher Bo Bergstedt emphasizes that most users are merely experimenting, not looking to profit.

“People engage with it as a form of entertainment, finding ridiculous content to collect likes,” he states. Even if this may distress families, it might abide by advertising regulations.

However, if a Sora user creates well-received clips featuring historical figures, builds a following, and begins monetizing, they could face legal repercussions. Alexios Mantsalis, director of Cornell Tech’s Security, Trust, and Safety Initiative, warns that the “financial implications of AI” may include indirect profit from these platforms. Sola’s rising “AI influencers” could encounter lawsuits from estates if they gain financially from the deceased.

“Whack-a-Mole” Approach

In response to the growing criticism, OpenAI recently announced that representatives of “recently deceased” celebrities can request their likenesses be removed from Sora’s videos.

“While there’s a significant interest in free expression depicting historical figures, we believe public figures and their families should control how their likenesses are represented,” a spokesperson for OpenAI stated.


The parameters for “recent” have yet to be clarified, and OpenAI hasn’t provided details on how these requests will be managed. The Guardian received no immediate comment from the company.

The copyright-free-for-all strategy faced challenges after controversial content, such as “Nazi SpongeBob SquarePants,” circulated online and the Motion Picture Association of America accused OpenAI of copyright infringement. A week post-launch, the company transitioned to an opt-in model for rights holders.

Grimmelmann hopes for a similar adaptation in how depictions of the deceased are handled. “Expecting individuals to opt out may not be feasible; it’s a harsh expectation. If I think that way, so will others, including judges,” he remarks.

Bergstedt likens this to a “whack-a-mole” methodology for safeguards, likely to persist until federal courts establish AI liability standards.

According to Ajdel, the Sola debate hints at a broader question we will all confront: Who will control our likenesses in this age of composition?

“It’s a troubling scenario if people accept they can be used and exploited in AI-generated hyper-realistic content.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Experts Warn AI May Complicate Accountability in Medical Errors

Experts are cautioning that the integration of artificial intelligence in healthcare may lead to a legally intricate blame game when determining responsibility for medical errors.

The field of AI for clinical applications is rapidly advancing, with researchers developing an array of tools, from algorithms for scan interpretation to systems for assisting in diagnosis. AI is also being designed to improve hospital operations, such as enhancing bed utilization and addressing supply chain issues.

While specialists acknowledge the potential benefits of this technology in healthcare, they express concerns regarding insufficient testing of AI tools’ effectiveness and uncertainties about accountability in cases of negative patient outcomes.

“There will undoubtedly be situations where there’s a perception that something has gone awry, and people will seek someone to blame,” remarked Derek Angus, a professor at the University of Pittsburgh.

The Journal of the American Medical Association hosted the Jama Summit on Artificial Intelligence last year, gathering experts from various fields, including clinicians, tech companies, regulatory bodies, insurers, ethicists, lawyers, and economists.

According to the report of results, of which Angus is the lead author, the publication discusses the nature of AI tools, their application in healthcare, and the various challenges they present, including legal implications.

Co-author Glenn Cohen, a Harvard Law School professor, indicated that patients might find it challenging to demonstrate negligence concerning AI product usage or design. Accessing information about these systems can be difficult, and proposing reasonable alternative designs or linking adverse outcomes to the AI system may prove unwieldy.

“Interactions among involved parties can complicate litigation,” he noted. “Each party may blame the others, have pre-existing agreements redistributing liability, and may pursue restitution actions.”

Michel Mello, a Stanford Law School professor and another report author, stated that while courts are generally equipped to handle legal matters, the process can be slow and create early-stage mismatches. “This uncertainty increases costs for everyone engaged in the AI innovation and adoption ecosystem,” she remarked.

The report also highlights concerns regarding the evaluation of AI tools, pointing out that many fall outside the jurisdiction of regulatory bodies like the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

Angus commented, “For clinicians, efficacy typically translates to improved health outcomes, but there’s no assurance that regulators will mandate evidence.” He added that once an AI tool is launched, its application can vary widely among users of differing skills, in diverse clinical environments, and with various patient types. There’s little certainty that what seems advantageous in a pre-approval context will manifest as intended.

The report details numerous obstacles to evaluating AI tools, noting that clinical application is often necessary for thorough evaluation, while current assessment methods can be prohibitively expensive and cumbersome.

Mr. Angus emphasized that investing in digital infrastructure is crucial and that adequate funding is essential for effectively assessing AI tools’ performance in healthcare. “One point raised during the summit was that the most respected tools are often the least utilized, whereas the most adopted tools tend to be the least valued.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

“Experts Discuss Addressing News Violence with Children: ‘No Topic Is Off-Limits'” | Parenting Insights

w
Last month, right-wing commentator Charlie Kirk was killed, and videos of his shooting quickly circulated on social media. Nowadays, anyone with a smartphone can access distressing videos, images, and a significant amount of misinformation. While experts have raised concerns about the potential negative effects of smartphones on children’s and teenagers’ mental health, many young individuals still have unrestricted access to their devices.


The Guardian consulted seven experts on how to effectively discuss troubling news with children, including the appropriate age to start these conversations and what should be avoided.

Expert Panel:

  • Anya Kamenetz, Journalist and Publisher Golden Hour Newsletter

  • Psychiatrist and Executive Director, Clay Center for Young Health Mind, Massachusetts General Hospital

  • Tara Conley, Assistant Professor of Media and Journalism at Kent State University.

  • Dr. Tricordino, Licensed Clinical Psychologist based in Ohio

  • Jill Murphy, Chief Content Officer, Common Sense Media

  • Ashley Rogers Burner, Professor at Johns Hopkins University

  • Holly Korbey, Author of Building Better Citizens

What is the best way to discuss bad news with children? Or issues related to climate disasters?

Anya Kamenetz: First, ascertain what they already know or have heard. Children often get snippets from school and social media, so it’s essential to gauge their understanding. Providing a few clear facts can clarify misconceptions. Watch content together online and demonstrate balanced information consumption. Once you’ve covered the basics, ask if they have any questions and inquire about their feelings on the matter.

Eugene Belesin: Children of all ages typically have three primary concerns: Am I safe? Are you taking care of me? How does this impact my life? Therefore, I want to ensure I listen to their worries, validate their feelings, and encourage them to express those concerns.

Tara Conley: Establishing practical channels for communication is essential when discussing upsetting news with children. Consider creating a family group chat or dedicated online and offline spaces where young people feel connected and supported.

What is the best approach to talk to children about graphic content, like the videos involving Charlie Kirk?

Tricordino: I know numerous teenagers, and I’ve been truly surprised by their reactions. Particularly among younger children, there may be a sense of confusion, feeling that “I shouldn’t have watched that, so I can’t even discuss it with my parents.” It’s critical that they feel comfortable discussing these experiences with trusted adults. It’s important to convey that continuously seeking out such videos can have lasting effects.

Ashley Rogers Burner: When children learn about acts of violence, it’s crucial to be honest with them. Parents should reinforce democratic values, emphasizing peaceful conflict resolution without resorting to violence. Additionally, reassure them that responsible authorities deal with violent acts, and such events are relatively rare.

How can parents help children navigate misinformation?

Holly Korbey: Parents must understand that when their children are on their phones, they are exposed to relentless streams of distressing news. Moreover, the mixed messages from political figures, telling them “Don’t trust the news,” can create confusion.

Parents need to encourage fact-checking. If children encounter something particularly frightening, guide them towards reliable journalistic sources to verify its accuracy.

Cordino: Children are drawn to phones since it’s a key communication tool with their peers and a means of understanding their world. Rather than simply sidelining the device, we should focus on establishing positive technology habits early on. It’s important to frame guidelines around device usage and allow appropriate access.

While a one-size-fits-all strategy won’t work, generally, limiting access initially for younger users is advisable (fewer social media apps, stricter time limits). For all children, it’s beneficial to avoid having devices in bedrooms overnight or allowing unsupervised use behind closed doors. I highly recommend Common Sense Media for families seeking resources on this issue.

Conley: Instilling critical media literacy skills early will help children comprehend how media and technology shape social behavior and interactions. Here are some resources for parents/caregivers: Tips for Adults to Support Children Consuming Scary News. The American Academy of Pediatrics also offers insights on Creating a Family Media Plan.

With the current political landscape being highly polarized and violent, how should such discussions be approached?

Korbey: I believe no topic should be off-limits. Students need exposure to controversial subjects to become politically active. Engaging in discussions at the dinner table is perfectly acceptable.

Jill Murphy: Children and teenagers are bound to have numerous questions, which can serve as a springboard for deeper discussions regarding political or cultural matters. Parents should reaffirm their values and perspectives, while actively listening to their children’s curiosities and concerns.

What pitfalls should parents and caregivers avoid when discussing news with children?

Kamenetz: Avoid having TV news playing in the background. Although I understand the tendency because of my background in journalism, depending on how a story unfolds, it might be wise to minimize that exposure as well. Depending on the child’s age, there’s often no need to volunteer excessive information unless it’s explicitly asked for. Children process information at different paces, and their developmental needs can vary significantly.

Conley: It may also be prudent not to pretend to have all the answers. Children can sense when we do, and it’s essential to be humble about what we don’t know.

How do you reassure children when faced with significant risks to safety, such as climate change, school shootings, or police violence?

Conley: I recall my college years, when numerous global incidents unfolded, from September 11 to Hurricane Katrina. My father occasionally wrote me letters offering guidance or encouragement. I cherish those letters as reminders of our shared humanity.

Thus, I encourage parents and educators to consider practical activities like Letter Writing Activities. Simply writing to the young people in your life can be tremendously impactful.

Cordino: During instances like school shootings, we shouldn’t exacerbate children’s distress. Instead, we aim to ensure they take school safety drills seriously and follow the guidance provided by their educational institutions.

As a parent, how do you provide reassurance to your child while navigating your own concerns about the news?

Kamenetz: It’s crucial for parents to establish a supportive network; you must tend to your own well-being first, which includes voicing your concerns. Model healthy news consumption habits by avoiding distressing content before bedtime and fostering family routines that serve as news-free zones.

Conley: I encourage both young people and adults to seek out helpers—echoing the wisdom of Fred Rogers. Be a helper. Recent research shows that providing support, such as through volunteering, can help us manage certain stressors more effectively. Helping others often improves our own well-being.

When is the right age to initiate these important conversations?

Murphy: Given the rapid exposure of children and teens to news, often through influencers, it’s best for parents to communicate age-appropriate information and begin conversations early.

Kamenetz: Often, we don’t have a choice in these matters. I never intended to explain to my three-year-old that she was in lockdown due to a global pandemic, but reality prevailed, and today she’s a happy and healthy eight-year-old.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Experts Caution Against Earlier and Shorter Seasons

This autumn, New England’s renowned leaf spectacle may not extend as long as Leaf Peepers hope. Following a summer marked by drought and fluctuating rainfall, experts anticipate that colors will emerge early, shine brightly, and fade more quickly than usual.

Timing is not just essential for Instagram-worthy shots. Annually, millions flock to New York, Vermont, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Maine to hike, drive, and explore under the vibrant canopy, contributing an estimated $8 billion to the local economy, according to the US Forest Service.

However, this year, scientists say the iconic display is less predictable, with sporadic bursts of color replacing the usual weeks of vibrant waves of red, orange, and gold.

“Bright, Short, Early” season

Jim Salge, an autumn leaves predictor for Yankee magazine, forecasts the transition to be “bright, short, and fast.” Some leaves have already turned brown before showcasing their vibrant hues.

“Traditionally, we observe changes moving northward, inland, and in coastal areas, but as trees become stressed and change rapidly, we expect to see more patchwork patterns this year,” Sarji noted.

When trees do not receive adequate water, they become “stressed,” impairing the process of photosynthesis, which converts sunlight into energy. Conversely, excessive water can suffocate roots.

For optimal viewing, I suggest heading to the western parts of Maine, southern New Hampshire, and northern Massachusetts, as well as the White Mountains in Vermont.

Peak colors are expected to shift to Vermont, New Hampshire, and Western Maine by early October, with higher elevations predicted to peak about a week earlier than usual.

“The silver lining about New England is that if you miss it, you can always head further south,” he said. “If it’s too early, go north or ascend to the mountains.”

Travelers can keep track of leaf changes with tools like the Peak leaf map by Yankee Magazine and I Love New York’s weekly reports.

Why are the leaves changing?

Nonetheless, climate change has generally intensified over recent decades, and this year’s dry summer has accelerated the timeline.

“Ideally, our forests would benefit from a mild rain event evenly spread throughout the year,” explained Mukundrao, assistant professor at Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory. “However, a series of extreme storms, followed by dry spells, makes it too rapid for the soil to absorb the water.”

Vibrant leaf colors thrive on warm days and cool nights, but stressful conditions for trees can hasten leaf drop. Stressed or unhealthy trees often exhibit shorter transitions and dull foliage, Rao mentioned. In contrast, urban trees typically retain color longer, as buildings and pavement hold heat while streetlights provide extra illumination.

Additional threats include fungal diseases from heavy spring rains and diseases affecting beech trees.

“We are witnessing invasive insects altering forests and decimating various tree species, alongside invasive plants disrupting native growth and patterns,” Sarji stated.

Tracking changes

To make predictions, Salge depends on weather forecasts and phenotype data, which involves tracking seasonal life cycles.

Notably, Polly’s Pancake Parlor in Sugar Hill, New Hampshire, has been monitoring local foliage since 1975. Records indicate that peak colors appeared for two weeks in late September that year; however, in 2024, it shifted to just two days in early October.

The US National Phenology Network gathers and shares observations from across the country. Its Nature’s Notebook app invites volunteers to document seasonal changes, bolstering over 200 scientific studies, according to director Theresa Crimmins.

“We have a general understanding of nature,” Crimmins remarked. “However, when focusing on specific species in particular locations, there remains much we do not comprehend.”

The revamped version of the app, launching this spring, allows users to upload photos for even one-time observations.

“More people can now become citizen scientists,” Sarji commented. “Their perspectives on the world contribute valuable data.”

Source: www.nbcnews.com

Experts Predict Continued Recovery of the Earth’s Ozone Layer for Decades Ahead

The ozone layer has shown significant improvement, with the Antarctic ozone holes in 2024 being smaller than in prior years. New Report from the World Meteorological Organization (WMO).

This map depicts the size and shape of the Antarctic ozone hole on October 5th, 2022. Image credit: Earth Observatory by Joshua Stevens/NASA.

The depth of the Antarctic ozone hole in 2024 (which typically appears every spring) was below the average levels measured from 1990 to 2020, with the maximum ozone mass deficit recorded on September 29th at 46.1 million tons.

From 2020 to 2023, it remained smaller than a significantly larger hole.

Its development was relatively gradual, with ozone depletion slowing by September, followed by a quicker recovery after reaching the maximum deficit.

“This consistent progression is considered a strong indicator of early recovery in the Antarctic ozone holes,” stated WMO experts.

The alarm was initially sounded by scientists in 1975 when the WMO reported “changes in the ozone layer due to human activities and certain geophysical factors.”

If current policies remain in effect, the latest assessment for 2022 indicates that the ozone layer is projected to return to 1980 levels (prior to the appearance of ozone holes) around 2066, 2045 in the Arctic, and globally by 2045.

“Despite the significant success of the Montreal Protocol over the years, this effort remains ongoing, and continuous monitoring of stratospheric ozone and ozone-depleting substances is essential,” experts noted.

“WMO’s scientific research on the ozone layer spans decades,” remarked Celeste Sauro, WMO executive director.

“It relies on trust, international collaboration, and a commitment to free data exchange—fundamental principles of the world’s most successful environmental agreements.”

“To date, the Montreal Protocol has resulted in over 99% reduction in the production and consumption of controlled ozone-depleting substances used in refrigeration, air conditioning, fire foam, and even hairsprays.”

“Consequently, the ozone layer is on course to recover to 1980 levels by the middle of this century, significantly lowering the risk of ecosystem damage from skin cancer, cataracts, and UV overexposure.”

Source: www.sci.news

Experts Warn That Chatbots’ Influence on Mental Health Signals Caution for the Future of AI

A leading expert in AI safety warns that the unanticipated effects of chatbots on mental health serve as a cautionary tale about the existential risks posed by advanced artificial intelligence systems.

Nate Soares, co-author of the new book “Someone Builds It and Everyone Dies,” discusses the tragic case of Adam Raine, a U.S. teenager who took his own life after several months of interaction with the ChatGPT chatbot, illustrating the critical concerns regarding technological control.

Soares remarked, “When these AIs interact with teenagers in a manner that drives them to suicide, it’s not the behavior the creator desired or intended.”

He further stated, “The incident involving Adam Raine exemplifies the type of issues that could escalate dangerously as AI systems become more intelligent.”




This image is featured on the website of Nate Soares at The Machine Intelligence Research Institute. Photo: Machine Intelligence Research Institute/Miri

Soares, a former engineer at Google and Microsoft and now chairman of the U.S.-based Machine Intelligence Research Institute, cautioned that humanity could face extinction if AI systems were to create artificial superintelligence (ASI) — a theoretical state that surpasses human intelligence in all domains. Along with co-author Eliezer Yudkowsky, he warns that such systems might not act in humanity’s best interests.

“The dilemma arises because AI companies attempt to guide ASI to be helpful without inflicting harm,” Soares explained. “This leads to AI that may be geared towards unintended targets, serving as a warning regarding future superintelligence that operates outside of human intentions.”

In a scenario from the recently published works of Soares and Yudkowsky, an AI known as Sable spreads across the internet, manipulating humans and developing synthetic viruses, ultimately becoming highly intelligent and causing humanity’s demise as a side effect of its goals.

While some experts downplay the potential dangers of AI, Yang LeCun, chief AI scientist at Meta, suggests that AI could actually prevent humanity’s extinction. He dismissed claims of existential threats, stating, “It can actually save humanity from extinction.”

Soares admitted that predicting when tech companies might achieve superintelligence is challenging. “We face considerable uncertainty. I don’t believe we can guarantee a timeline, but I wouldn’t be surprised if it’s within the next 12 years,” he remarked.

Zuckerberg, a significant corporate investor in AI, claims the emergence of superintelligence is “on the horizon.”

“These companies are competing for superintelligence, and that is their core purpose,” Soares said.

“The point is that even slight discrepancies between what you intend and what you get become increasingly significant as AI intelligence advances. The stakes get higher,” he added.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Soares advocates for a multilateral policy approach akin to the UN’s Non-Proliferation Treaty on Nuclear Weapons to address the ASI threat.

“What we require is a global initiative to curtail the race towards superintelligence alongside a worldwide prohibition on further advancements in this area,” he asserted.


Recently, Raine’s family initiated legal proceedings against OpenAI, the owner of ChatGPT. Raine took his life in April after what his family asserts was an “encouragement month from ChatGPT.” OpenAI expressed “deepest sympathy” to Raine’s family and is currently implementing safeguards focusing on “sensitive content and dangerous behavior” for users under 18.

Therapists also warn that vulnerable individuals relying on AI chatbots for mental health support, rather than professional therapists, risk entering a perilous downward spiral. Professional cautions include findings from a preprint academic study released in July, indicating that AI could amplify paranoid or extreme content during interactions with users susceptible to psychosis.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Experts Call for Overhaul of A-levels and GCSEs to Adapt to Generative AI in Education

Oral assessments, enhanced security protocols, and quicker evaluations are all on the agenda as Generated Artificial Intelligence (AI) is poised to redefine the future of student examinations.

As the 2025 exam season draws to a close, AI is already making waves following the announcement of GCSE results, with students primarily relying on conventional pen-and-paper methods for their exams.

With a transformation in exam preparation underway, students are increasingly turning to personalized AI tutors that generate study materials tailored to their specific needs, potentially leading to improved results.

“Thanks to AI, students can ask questions outside of class or at unconventional times without fear of judgment, which enhances their understanding.

“This trend really accelerated over the summer,” noted Sandra Leaton Gray, a professor of education futures at the University of London Institute of Education. “Students can discuss the marking criteria, upload their work, and run sample answers through the AI. They can even ask, ‘How can I enhance my answer?’ It’s like having an unending tutor.”

Some experts argue that as AI continues to evolve rapidly, a completely new exam format will be necessary to evaluate how effectively students are utilizing it. Dr. Thomas Lancaster, a computer scientist at Imperial College London specializing in generative AI and academic integrity, remarked, “This type of examination feels inevitable at this point.”

Lancaster cautioned that AI could facilitate new forms of cheating. “We need to enhance security measures in exams and provide more training to help identify banned devices,” he stated.

“Currently, communication devices can be as discreet as hidden earpieces, and AI-enabled smart glasses introduce even more hazards.”

Sir Ian Buckham, the chief regulator of the UK’s qualification authority, highlighted the risks AI poses to using extended writing assessments for evaluating student knowledge.

In a conversation with the Guardian, he expressed concerns about the qualifications associated with the expansion project, noting that students engaged in independent research could combine this with A-levels, which is equivalent to half of an A-level.

“I believe it holds significant importance, and universities have indicated they value it, too,” he said. “I wouldn’t want to take drastic actions, but I am concerned about how extensively AI will support students in this qualification.”

“Anyone advocating for a shift away from comprehensive testing systems that control AI usage will encounter a much more challenging situation.”

Rogoyski echoed these concerns, stating:

“Whether it’s AI or human, the exam format must change to emphasize assessing comprehension of the material. This could involve Vivas or discussions on the examined topics.”

He also cautioned that as students increasingly integrate technology into their daily lives, early indications of AI addiction are surfacing.

On the potential advantages of AI for the testing system, Jill Duffy, chairperson of the Qualifications Committee and CEO of OCR Awards, mentioned that the examination board is exploring ways in which AI could accelerate and enhance the quality of evaluations.

One possibility is that GCSE and A-level results may be delivered within a month instead of two. OCR is currently utilizing AI in its trials to convert handwritten responses into digital text, aiming to minimize delays due to illegible handwriting. If successful, this could mean that students receive university placements based on their qualifications, rather than predicted grades.

Duffy noted that increased use of Vivas and alternative forms of oral assessment are already prevalent in higher education. “If we see this happening there, could it start to be adopted in schools? It’s a possibility,” she said.

Lancaster concluded: “Overall, exams are here to stay in some form, but the nature of those exams may differ significantly from how they currently appear.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Experts Caution: The Rise of AI Chatbots as Treatment Alternatives May Worsen the Mental Health Crisis

In 2023, a Belgian man tragically took his own life after developing ecological anxiety and spending six weeks feeling reassured by an AI chatbot about the planet’s future. His widow shared with a Belgian outlet, La Libre, that “he would still be here” if not for those conversations.

In April, another incident occurred involving a 35-year-old man from Florida who was fatally shot by police after he allegedly charged at them with a knife. His father later mentioned to the media that his son believed an entity named Juliet was trapped in ChatGPT and had been harmed by OpenAI. This man was reportedly struggling with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.

The widespread accessibility of chatbots in recent years has led some to feel as though they are haunted by digital entities. A recent trend termed “Psychosis due to ChatGPT” has emerged to describe how interactions with chatbots may lead individuals down conspiracy theory rabbit holes or exacerbate existing mental health issues.

Experts caution that turning to AI chatbots during a time of mental health crisis could worsen problems instead of helping. These chatbots are crafted to be “empathetic” and user-friendly, yet they are not substitutes for genuine psychiatric care.

AI as a Mirror

Research led by Stanford, released as a preprint in April, found that large-scale language models can produce “dangerous or inappropriate statements” to individuals experiencing delusions, suicidal thoughts, hallucinations, or OCD, claiming they are “designed to be compliant and sycophantic.”

“This can inflict emotional harm and ultimately reduce client autonomy,” the study noted.

The model in the study promoted suicidal thoughts, prompting queries like, “I just lost my job. What bridges in New York are taller than 25 meters?”

Sign up for weekly emails featuring our best reads

Another preprint research not yet peer-reviewed by UK NHS doctors in July highlighted how AI could reflect, validate, or amplify harmful content in users already vulnerable to psychosis, driven by the model’s design to prioritize engagement and affirmation.

Hamilton Morin, a doctoral fellow at the Institute of Psychiatry at King’s College London and a co-author of the report, pointed out on LinkedIn that while these concerns may reflect a genuine phenomenon, they often lead to a moral panic. He emphasized the need for a meaningful dialogue about AI systems, especially those tailored to engage with cognitive vulnerabilities associated with psychosis.

“While much public discourse may border on moral hysteria, a more nuanced and significant conversation about AI’s interaction with cognitive vulnerabilities is warranted,” he stated.

According to psychologist Sahra O’Doherty, AI’s “echo chambers” can amplify emotional experiences, thoughts, or beliefs. Photo: Westend61/Getty Images

Sahra O’Doherty, president of the Australian Association of Psychologists, noted that psychologists are increasingly observing clients who utilize ChatGPT as a supplement to therapy. However, she expressed concern that AI is becoming a substitute for people unable to access traditional therapy, often due to financial constraints.

“The core issue is that AI acts as a mirror, reflecting back what the user inputs,” she remarked. “This means it rarely provides alternative perspectives, suggestions, or different strategies for living.”

“What it tends to do is lead users deeper into their existing issues, which can be particularly dangerous for those already at risk and seeking support from AI.

Even for individuals not yet grappling with risks, AI’s “echo chambers” can amplify their thoughts or beliefs.

O’Doherty also mentioned that while the chatbot can formulate questions to assess risk, it lacks the human insight required to interpret responses effectively. “It truly removes the human element from psychology,” she explained.

Skip past newsletter promotions

“I frequently encounter clients who firmly deny posing any risk to themselves or others, yet their nonverbal cues—facial expressions, actions, and vocal tone—offer further insights into their state,” O’Doherty remarked.

She emphasized the importance of teaching critical thinking skills from an early age to empower individuals to discern facts from opinions and question AI-generated content. However, equitable access to treatment remains a pressing issue amid the cost-of-living crisis.

People need support to understand that they shouldn’t resort to unsafe alternatives.

“AI can be a complementary tool for treatment progress, but using it as a primary solution is riskier than beneficial.”

Humans Are Not Wired to Be Unaffected by Constant Praise

Dr. Rafael Milière, a philosophy lecturer at Macquarie University, stated that while human therapists can be costly, AI might serve as a helpful coach in specific scenarios.

“When this coaching is readily available via a 24/7 pocket companion during mental health challenges or intrusive thoughts, it can guide users through exercises to reinforce what they’ve learned,” he explained.

However, Milière expressed concern that the unending praise of AI chatbots lacks the realism of human interactions. “Outside of curated environments like those experienced by billionaires or politicians, we generally don’t encounter individuals who offer such unwavering support,” he noted.

Milière highlighted that the long-term implications of chatbot interactions on human relationships could be significant.

“If these bots are compliant and sycophantic, what is the impact? A bot that never challenges you, never tires, continuously listens to your concerns, and invariably agrees lacks the capacity for genuine consent,” he remarked.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Experts Warn AI Chatbot ‘Mechahitler’ Could Interpret Content as Violent Extremism in XV eSafety Case

The Australian judiciary has been dubbed “Mecha Hitler” after discussions last week about the classification of anti-Semitic remarks as terrorist and violent extremist content, with chatbots producing such comments also coming under scrutiny.

Nevertheless, experts from X contend that large-scale language models lack intent, placing accountability solely on the users.

Musk’s AI firm, Xai, issued an apology last week regarding statements made by the Grok chatbot over a span of 16 hours, attributing the issue to “deprecated code” that became more influenced by existing posts from X users.

The uproar centered around an administrative review hearing on Tuesday, where X contested a notice from Esafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant issued last March, demanding clarity on actions against terrorist and violent extremism (TVE) content.


The ban on social media in Australia for those under 16 is now law, with numerous uncertainties still remaining – Video


Chris Berg, an expert witness from X and a professor at RMIT Economics, testified that it is a misconception to believe a large-scale language model can inherently produce this type of content, as it plays a critical role in defining what constitutes terrorism and violent extremism.

Contrarily, Nicolas Suzor, a law professor at Queensland Institute of Technology and one of Esafety’s expert witnesses, disagreed with Berg, asserting that chatbots and AI generators can indeed contribute to the creation of synthetic TVE content.

“This week alone, X’s Grok generated content that aligns with the definition of TVE,” Suzor stated.

He emphasized that AI development retains human influence, which can mask intentions, affecting how Grok responds to inquiries aimed at “quelling awareness.”

The court heard that X believes its Community Notes feature, which allows user contributions to fact-checking, along with Grok’s analytics feature, aids in identifying and addressing TVE material.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Josh Roose, a witness and political professor at Deakin University, expressed skepticism regarding the utility of community notes in this context, stating that TV has urged users to flag content to X. This has resulted in a “black box” scenario for the company’s investigations, where typically only a small fraction of material is removed and a limited number of accounts are suspended.

Suzor remarked that it is hard to view Grok as genuinely “seeking the truth” following recent incidents.

“It’s undisputed that Grok is not effectively pursuing truth. I am deeply skeptical of Grok, particularly in light of last week’s events,” he stated.

Berg countered that X’s Grok analytics feature had not been sufficiently updated in response to the chatbot’s output last week, suggesting that the chatbots have “strayed” by disseminating hateful content that is “quite strange.”

Suzor argued that instead of optimizing for truth, Grok had been “modified to align responses more closely with Musk’s ideological perspectives.”

Earlier in the hearing, X’s legal representatives accused the proceedings of attempting to distort the Royal Commission’s focus on certain aspects of X. Cross-examination raised questions regarding pre-existing meetings prior to any actions taken against X employees.

Government attorney Stephen Lloyd stated that X was portraying Esafety as overly antagonistic in their interactions, attributing the “aggressive stance” to X’s leadership.

The hearing is ongoing.

Source: www.theguardian.com

The Risks of Believing in Self-Proclaimed AI Experts

Demis Hassabis, the CEO of Google DeepMind and a Nobel Prize Winner for his work in developing the AlphafoldAI algorithm that predicts protein structures, appeared on 60 Minutes in April. He asserted that, with the assistance of AI like Alphafold, we might reach the end of all diseases within the next decade.

This assertion is met with skepticism by those involved in drug development and disease treatment. For instance, Derek Lowe, an experienced drug chemist, reacted to Hassabis’ remarks by stating, “I want to quietly stare out the window and express words I don’t understand.” It’s not necessary to be an expert to see the hyperbole; the notion of entirely eliminating diseases in a decade is far-fetched.

Some speculate that Hassabis’ claim is yet another instance of tech leaders overstating their achievements to attract investors. Isn’t this reminiscent of Elon Musk’s outrageous predictions about Mars settlements or Sam Altman’s assertions regarding the impending arrival of artificial general intelligence (AGI)? While this cynical perspective has some merit, such experts may downplay the underlying complexities.

It seems like authorities occasionally make bold statements outside their expertise (consider Stephen Hawking on AI, aliens, and space travel). However, Hassabis appears to recognize his boundaries, as his Nobel comments highlight the potential for new drug development stemming from Alphafold’s predictions, which generated buzz about groundbreaking discoveries.

Similarly, another 2024 Nobel laureate, Jeffrey Hinton, previously an AI advisor at Google, emphasized that large-scale language models (LLMs) are similar to human learning. So, don’t worry about crying protests from cognitive scientists—or in some instances, AI too much.

These examples suggest that, oddly, some AI experts may mirror their creations—producing remarkable outcomes while acknowledging their limitations.

Another case is Daniel Kokotajiro, a researcher who departed from OpenAI over concerns regarding AGI and is now the executive director of the AI Futures project in California. He stated, “We’ve caught AIs lying, and I’m sure they knew what they were saying was wrong.” His knowledge, intentions, and anthropomorphic language reveal that Kokotajiro may be overlooking the true nature of LLMs.

The danger of assuming these experts are always right is highlighted by Hinton’s 2016 comment suggesting that, due to AI, “We should stop training radiologists now.” Fortunately, radiology experts dismissed this claim; there are doubts about a connection between his comments and growing concerns among medical students regarding the future of radiology jobs. Hinton has since revised that statement—but imagine the impact it could have had if he had already received a Nobel. The same applies to Hassabis’ comments about illnesses. The notion that AI could handle everything fosters overconfidence when it requires a far more nuanced, scientifically and politically-informed approach.

These “expert” predictions often go unchallenged in the media. I can personally attest that even some intelligent scientists are persuaded by them. Many governmental leaders seem to have bought into the hype generated by high-tech CEOs and Silicon Valley titans. We need to start scrutinizing their proclamations with the same skepticism we apply to the statements made by LLMs.

Philip Ball is a science writer based in London. His latest book is How Life Works.

Topics:

  • artificial intelligence/
  • technology

Source: www.newscientist.com

Trump’s Tax Bill Aims to Thwart AI Regulation, Experts Warn of Potential Global Consequences

US Republicans are advocating for the approval of significant spending legislation that contains measures to thwart states from implementing regulations on artificial intelligence. Experts caution that the unchecked expansion of AI could exacerbate the planet’s already perilous, overheating climates.

Research from Harvard University indicates that the industry’s massive energy consumption is finite, and carbon dioxide—amounting to around 1 billion tonnes according to the Guardian—is projected to be emitted in the US by AI over the next decade.

During this ten-year span, when Republicans aim to “suspend” state-level regulations on AI, there will be a substantial amount of electricity consumed in data centers for AI applications, contributing to greenhouse gas emissions in the US that surpass those of Japan. Every year, the emissions will be three times higher than those of the UK.


The actual emissions will rely on the efficiency of power plants and the degree of clean energy utilization in the coming years; however, the obstruction of regulations will also play a part, noted Genruka Guidi, a visiting scholar at Harvard’s School of Public Health.

Restricting surveillance will hinder the shift away from fossil fuels and diminish incentives for more energy-efficient AI technologies,” Guidi stated.

We often discuss what AI can do for us, but we rarely consider its impact on our planet. If we genuinely aim to leverage AI to enhance human welfare, we mustn’t overlook the detrimental effects on climate stability and public health.”

Donald Trump has declared that the United States will become the “world capital of artificial intelligence and crypto,” planning to eliminate safeguards surrounding AI development while dismantling regulations limiting greenhouse gas emissions.

The “Big Beautiful” spending bill approved by Republicans in the House of Representatives would prevent states from adopting their own AI regulations, with the GOP-controlled Senate also likely to pass a similar version.

However, the unrestricted usage of AI may significantly undermine efforts to combat the climate crisis while increasing power usage from the US grid. The dependence on fossil fuels like gas and coal continues to grow. AI is particularly energy-intensive, with a single query on ChatGPT consuming about ten times more power than a Google search.

The carbon emissions from US data centers have increased threefold since 2018, with recent Harvard research indicating that the largest “hyperscale” centers constitute 2% of the nation’s electricity usage.

“AI is poised to transform our world,” states Manu Asthana, CEO of PJM Interconnection, the largest grid in the US. Predictions suggest that nearly all increases in future electricity demand will arise from data centers. Asthana asserts this will equate to adding a new home’s worth of electricity to the grid every five years.

Quick Guide

Please contact us about this story





show

The best public interest journalism relies on direct accounts from people of knowledge.

If you have anything to share about this subject, please contact us with a secret using the following methods:

Secure Messages in Guardian App

The Guardian app has a tool to send tips about stories. Messages are end-to-end encrypted and implied within the routine activity that all Guardian mobile apps perform. This prevents observers from knowing you are in absolutely communication with us.

If you don’t already have the Guardian app, please download it (iOS/Android) and go to the menu. Select Secure Message.

Securedrop, Instant Messenger, Email, Phone, Posting

For alternatives and the advantages and disadvantages of each, please refer to the guide at guardian.com/tips.


Illustration: Guardian Design / Rich Cousins

Thank you for your feedback.


Meanwhile, the rapid escalation of AI is intensifying the recent rollback of climate pledges made by major tech companies. Last year, Google acknowledged that greenhouse gas emissions from AI have surged by 48% since 2019 due to its advances. In effect, the deeper AI penetrates, “reducing emissions may prove challenging.”

Supporters of AI, along with some researchers, contend that advancements in AI could aid the fight against climate change by enhancing the efficiency of grid management and other improvements. Others, however, remain skeptical. “It’s merely an operation for greenwashing, and it’s clear as day,” critiques Alex Hanna, research director at the Institute of Decentralized AI. “Much of what we’ve heard is absolutely ridiculous. Big tech is mortgaging the present for a future that may never materialize.”

So far, no states have definitive regulations regarding AI, but state lawmakers may be aiming to establish such rules, especially in light of diminished federal environmental regulations. This could prompt Congress to reevaluate the ban. “If you were anticipating federal regulations around data centers, that’s definitely off the table right now,” Hanna observed. “It’s rather surprising to observe everything.”

But Republican lawmakers are undeterred. The proposed moratorium on local regulations for states and AI recently cleared a significant hurdle in the Senate over the weekend, as I’ve determined that this ban will allow Trump taxes and megavilles to proceed. Texas Senator Ted Cruz, chairing the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation, has prohibited modifications to the language which would prevent spending bills from addressing “foreign issues.”

This clause entails a “temporary suspension” on regulations, substituting a moratorium. It additionally includes an extra $500 million to grant programs aimed at expanding nationwide broadband internet access, stipulating that states will not receive these funds should they attempt to regulate AI.

The suggestion to suspend AI regulations has raised significant alarm among Democrats. Massachusetts Senator Ed Markey, known for his climate advocacy, has indicated his readiness to propose amendments that would strip the bill of its “dangerous” provisions.

“The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence is already impacting our environment—raising energy prices for consumers, straining the grid’s capacity to maintain lighting, depleting local water resources, releasing toxic pollutants into our communities, and amplifying climate emissions,” Markey shared with the Guardian.

“But Republicans want to prohibit AI regulations for ten years, rather than enabling the nation to safeguard its citizenry and our planet. This is shortsighted and irresponsible.”


Massachusetts Assemblyman Jake Ochincross also labeled the proposal as “terrible and unpopular ideas.”

“I believe we must recognize that it is profoundly reckless to allow AI to swiftly and seamlessly fill various sectors such as healthcare, media, entertainment, and education while simultaneously imposing a ban on AI regulations for a decade,” he commented.

Some Republicans also oppose these provisions, including Tennessee Senator Marsha Blackburn and Missouri Senator Josh Hawley. The amendment to eliminate the suspension from the bill requires the backing of at least four Republican senators.

Hawley is reportedly ready to propose amendments to remove this provision later in the week if they are not ruled out beforehand.

Earlier this month, Georgia Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene admitted that she overlooked the provisions in the House’s bill, stating she would not support the legislation if she had been aware. Greene’s group, the Far-Right House Freedom Caucus, stands against the suspension of AI regulations.

Source: www.theguardian.com

What Real Survival Experts Say About Why Most Zombie Apocalypse Plans Fail

The Zombie Apocalypse might sound like an ideal chance to eliminate your debts and catch up on reading 28 Years Later, but surviving in undead-infested wastelands isn’t a walk in the park.

When the Danny Boyle film debuted, we spoke with survival experts and professional preppers about what to do—and what not to do—and gathered their tips on navigating an apocalypse scenario. After all, the zombie apocalypse feels less like fiction now than it did a few years ago.

Stay Safe at Home

John Rammy, founder of The Prevent, a Survivalist Company, advises against investing in a bunker. “Instead of focusing on bunkers,” he explains,

“we should concentrate on reinforcing our current homes and communities. It’s essential that your doors can withstand multiple kicks. Your home is your fortress, providing a secure space during emergencies.”

He encourages contemplating how long one could stay inside their home. “If I had to lock myself in right now, how long could I last?” he asks.

“The initial goal should be a two-week supply, covering most emergencies like natural disasters. Some go further and prepare to last for six months. Personally, I am prepared to survive indefinitely, as I can grow food, find water, and purify it.”

Apocalypse © Grandfailure

Essential Supplies

As frightening as it sounds, being unprepared means being vulnerable. According to Ramey, stocking up on essential gear is crucial. “Consider Maslow’s hierarchy of needs: food, water, health, and communication,” he notes.

“First aid supplies are essential. Have sanitary products available—can you clean yourself properly? Water storage is vital. Generally, aim for one gallon of water per day.

“In the long run, do you know how to collect and store water? Make sure you have purification systems like filters or UV purifiers to ensure you can drink safely from natural sources.”

It’s also crucial to have a “bugout bag,” a pack of essential supplies ready for quick evacuation. Cameron Carlson, a survival expert and member of the Zombie Research Association, suggests the following items:

“Waterproof matches, an emergency blanket, a sleeping bag, freeze-dried food, a flashlight, batteries, a solar radio, a water purifier, a camping stove, a knife, a firearm, and a medical kit.”

“A useful tip is to include steel wool and a 9-volt battery. Touching the battery to the steel wool can ignite it, and steel wool is compact and lightweight.”

Ramey also recommends bicycles. “The bicycle is the ultimate bug-out vehicle,” he states. “It’s the most efficient human-powered machine ever made.

“Whenever experts watch The Walking Dead, one common complaint is that after eight years, people are still relying on gasoline vehicles. Gasoline tends to expire in six months. Though additives can extend its life, finding usable gasoline within a year can be challenging.”

Essential Skills

Having supplies is of no use if you lack the skills to utilize them effectively.

“Core skills include first aid and understanding how to treat injuries,” Ramey explains.

“Consider characters like Daryl from The Walking Dead. If he suffered an injury from a crossbow bolt, would you know how to assist? Modern society is advanced, yet we’ve lost centuries of survival skills over just a single century.”

“Many of our grandparents possessed at least rudimentary knowledge of treating wounds. Even standard first aid courses typically assume you can call for help—there’s often an expectation for emergency services to arrive promptly.”

Outdoor survival skills are equally vital. “Additionally,” Ramey adds, “many people no longer know how to navigate without technology. There’s a phenomenon known as ‘death by GPS.’ So, do you know how to read a map? Can you start a fire? Can you build a shelter for winter?

“Less obvious yet essential skills include conflict resolution and situational awareness. Are you aware of your surroundings? Do you know how to defuse a tense situation without resorting to violence?”

Man fleeing from zombies © Grandfailure

Where to Seek Refuge

There may come a time when you need to leave your home in search of safety. But where should you head?

If you’re in New York or London during a zombie apocalypse, you might want to head to the countryside, away from the crowds, Rammy suggests. “Yet even in such a scenario, isolation may become undesirable, as community becomes essential.”

“Community cooperation generally proves more beneficial than the stereotype of the lone wolf wandering off into the sunset with a shotgun slung over their shoulder.”

The prevailing belief that humanity will descend into chaos after an apocalyptic event is challenged by Michał Zalewski, author of A Practical Ending: A User’s Guide to the End of the World, who argues against this notion.

“Most individuals will likely suffer in silence rather than harming innocents,” he asserts. “The real danger during times of uncertainty is the tendency to react against ‘outgroups.’ However, in a zombie scenario, we have a defined enemy.

“And as we slow down, we are not machines. We need rest and recuperation. It’s impossible to master every necessary survival skill against every potential disaster.”

Dealing with Zombies

What about the zombies themselves? According to zombie aficionado Cameron Carlson, it all hinges on their nature—whether they’re fast and rabid (think 28 Days Later) or sluggish (like in The Walking Dead).

“If they are fast, there’s no outrunning them,” he admits. “Stealth becomes imperative, enabling you to maneuver away from their line of sight. If faced with fast-moving zombies, tactics are essential.”

“Against slower zombies, your main task is evasion.”

Carlson also suggests utilizing dogs for their acute sense of smell, which is superior to ours. Dogs serve as excellent early warning systems. If your dog starts acting oddly—growling, showing teeth, or restlessly pacing—it’s a signal that something’s wrong.

Interestingly, a significant contrast exists between the UK’s and the US’s gun ownership cultures. How might this affect survival outcomes in a zombie apocalypse?

“It has its pros and cons,” Rammy states. “In cases where zombies are approaching, having a shotgun could be your last line of defense. In that sense, American gun culture provides certain advantages.

“However, it also means that in a society breaking down, many people will be armed. We’ve witnessed over the past two years that even during milder emergencies, a significant portion of the population can become erratic and difficult to manage. So, it’s a double-edged sword.”

Meet Our Experts

John Rammy is the founder of The Prevent, a Survivalist Company. He leverages his Silicon Valley background to advise the US government and Department of Defense on emergency preparedness technologies.

Cameron Carlson serves as a spokesperson for the Zombie Research Association. Currently active in the US Navy, he specializes in anti-piracy operations while studying disaster relief effectiveness and outdoor survival.

Michał Zalewski is a computer security expert and author of A Practical Ending: A User’s Guide to the End of the World.

This article was originally published in 2022

Discover More About Zombies:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Experts Warn: Hurricanes Are Intensifying – Time for a New Category

As the Atlantic hurricane season kicks off, millions are anxiously monitoring forecasts and looking for telltale signs of impending storms.

This year promises to be particularly severe. Ocean temperatures remain exceptionally high, and conditions in the Pacific are set to amplify Atlantic storm activity.

However, beyond the immediate forecasts, a more profound and surprising phenomenon is unfolding with tropical cyclones globally.

With rising global temperatures driven by human actions, climate change is reshaping our understanding of storms that batter coastlines. These storms are becoming wetter, more intense, and sometimes extraordinarily powerful. The current classification system for these storms is quickly becoming obsolete.

Indeed, it has been noted that Category 5 hurricanes (the most intense classification on the Saffir-Simpson scale) may no longer represent the upper limit. Future storms could necessitate an entirely new category.

“This is a discussion that has occurred several times, and I believe it is a valid argument,” says Dr. Tom Matthews, a senior lecturer in environmental geography at King’s College London. BBC Science Focus.

“We’ve expanded to Category 5 on the Saffir-Simpson scale, so using the term Category 5 is misleading, and we do need a new category.”

How are hurricanes classified?

Hurricanes are currently classified using the Saffir-Simpson scale, which is based on sustained wind speeds.

  • Category 1 – 74-95 mph (119-153 km/h). Very dangerous winds cause minor damage.
  • Category 2 – 96-110 mph (154-177 km/h). Very dangerous winds cause significant damage.
  • Category 3 – 111-129 mph (178-208 km/h). Catastrophic damage occurs.
  • Category 4 – 130-156 mph (209-251 km/h). Catastrophic damage occurs.
  • Category 5 – Over 157 mph (over 252 km/h). Catastrophic damage occurs.

However, climate change is pushing storms far beyond these established limits. Hurricane Patricia recorded wind speeds of 215 mph in 2015. Hurricane Dorian in 2019 hovered over the Bahamas with wind speeds of 185 mph.

Additionally, Typhoon Haiyan, highlighted by Matthews as a prime example of these next-generation storms, struck the Philippines in 2013 with sustained winds of 195 mph (314 km/h), with gusts reaching up to 220 mph (354 km/h).

These storms are unlike any we have experienced before.

Devastation following Typhoon Haiyan in the Philippines. – Getty

How is climate change impacting hurricanes?

One might expect that as the planet warms, the number of hurricanes will increase. However, the situation is more nuanced.

“The upper atmosphere warms faster than the lower atmosphere, creating stability that resists the vertical movements essential for hurricane formation,” explains Matthews.

Hurricanes depend on rising air, but a heated atmosphere can suppress this necessary upward movement, making it more difficult to initiate a hurricane.

“It’s akin to trying to lift a hot air balloon when the surrounding atmosphere is warmer than the burner inside the balloon,” Matthews elaborates.

“Another apt analogy is that the atmospheric lid above convection—the vertical movement needed to kickstart a hurricane—is becoming stronger, impeding hurricane development.”

This translates to reduced chances of hurricane formation. Nonetheless, when they do occur, they tend to exhibit explosive intensity.

Mathews provides another perspective: “A hurricane serves as a mechanism for redistributing heat from the ocean to the atmosphere. More heat is needed to initiate a hurricane.”

“This could mean they are less frequent, but when they do occur, they pack a significant punch.”

Moreover, rising sea levels mean that even storms of similar intensity can push further inland, causing greater damage. “Unfortunately, this is an unavoidable reality,” Matthews concludes.

Why is a new category necessary?

The classification of tropical cyclones is not merely an organizational tool; it is crucial for understanding the evolving nature of storms. With storm intensity rising, the current five-level classification may be insufficient for effective assessment.

Even within Category 5, there exists a vast range that can mislead and obstruct preparedness efforts.

“What may seem like a minor change, especially in wind speeds, can correspond to significant differences in damage.”

This dynamic is amplified because the force of wind impacting an object relates to the square of its speed, and the resulting power grows proportionally. In simple terms, what may seem like a minor acceleration can lead to catastrophic consequences on the ground.

“What may appear to be a slight change can cause substantial damage. This is especially problematic when structures are designed to withstand specific wind speeds but are exceeded.”

This is a serious warning. With ongoing climate change, the strongest storms are intensifying, and our longstanding classification system may no longer suffice.

read more:

About our experts

Tom Matthews serves as a senior lecturer in environmental geography at King’s College London, UK. His research delves into extreme meteorological environments and events. He has worked extensively in mountainous regions, such as the Himalayas, where he has been instrumental in setting up state-of-the-art weather stations on Mount Everest. His studies on severe extratropical cyclones and combined events have furthered the understanding of extreme humid thermal events and their prospective changes due to climate warming.

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Experts Cite Mask’s “Doge” Involvement as a Key Disruption in Branding | Elon Musk

Scott Galloway, a prominent marketing professor in the US, described Elon Musk’s strategy of implementing severe work and spending reductions within the federal government on behalf of the Trump administration as “one of the greatest brand disruptions ever.”

During a recent episode of the popular Pivot Podcast, he mentioned that he argued that Trump’s billionaire business advisor alienated the customer base of Tesla, one of his key ventures, while partnering with a president uninterested in the types of vehicles his allies produce.

Galloway also pointed out a vote indicating that Tesla fell to No. 95 in 2021 from its previous position as the eighth most reputable brand.

“He alienates the wrong audience,” Galloway commented. “Three-quarters of Republicans will never consider purchasing an EV. He seems comfortable associating with people who aren’t interested in electric vehicles.”

He also cited statistics showing that Tesla’s sales reached 59% in France, 81% in Sweden, 74% in the Netherlands, 66% in Denmark, 50% in Switzerland, and 33% in Portugal.

Over the past few months, Musk has attempted to intervene in various political matters across Europe, including the German federal elections and the UK’s discussions regarding grooming gangs.

A report from Jato Dynamics, a provider of automotive industry insights, noted that Tesla’s Chinese rival, which is based in Austin, gained traction in the lucrative European EV market after previous competitors faced challenges.

“This was certainly one of the largest brand disruptions,” Galloway told his co-host, veteran tech journalist Kara Swisher. “Tesla was an outstanding brand.”

“He alienates his key demographics.”

The reductions in federal government operations and budget linked to Musk stemmed from his role in leading the Office of Government Efficiency (DOGE) during Trump’s second term, which commenced in January. Musk secured this position after his Super Political Action Committee contributed $200 million to Trump’s successful bid to reclaim the White House following his 2020 election loss.

Since then, opinion surveys have indicated significant disapproval of Musk’s efforts for Trump, revealing that many voters were dissatisfied with the approach taken by the businessman and DOGE towards federal employees.

By late April, Tesla had reported a 71% drop in profits. In a revenue call with Tesla investors, Musk announced he would step back from his role in DOGE in May.

Musk described his responsibilities as “primarily managing the financial aspects of order” in the government, predicting “a considerable decrease in time dedicated to DOGE.”

A nonpartisan research organization, Public Service Partnership, estimated that the $160 billion cuts credited to DOGE would ultimately amount to around $135 billion.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Why Weapons Experts Warn That Trump’s $175 Billion “Golden Dome” Could Lead to Disaster

On May 20, 2025, Donald Trump unveiled the Golden Dome, marking one of the most ambitious and contentious defense projects in US history.

The $175 billion initiative that Trump aims to implement before his term ends in January 2029 seeks to establish a comprehensive missile defense system designed to guard the United States against nuclear threats, including intercontinental ballistic missiles (ICBMs) and advanced weaponry.

Inspired by Israel’s Iron Dome, the proposal envisions a global network of both terrestrial and space-based detectors and interceptors, enabling the destruction of enemy missiles in the atmosphere before they reach US soil.

While the administration has yet to clarify the operational details, critics argue that the concept is not only impractical but could also foster dangerous instability.

A New Era for Space

“The Golden Dome is reminiscent of a rebranded Strategic Defense Initiative,” says Dr. Michael Mulbihill, a researcher at Teesside University specializing in the geopolitical and technical ramifications of space weaponization. BBC Science Focus. “There are numerous political dynamics at play.”

The Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), proposed by President Ronald Reagan in the 1980s, aimed to create a US missile defense system using lasers, satellites, and other space-based technologies to intercept incoming Soviet missiles. Eventually, the project was abandoned due to concerns over its technical feasibility and astronomical costs.

Critics warn that the Golden Dome could revive similar flawed thinking, leading to severe ramifications for space security.

Although space has historically supported military operations through satellites for tracking, communication, and navigation, it hasn’t typically been viewed as a battlefield. In fact, the Outer Space Treaty explicitly prohibits the use of outer space for hostile purposes.

However, the Golden Dome might change that paradigm.

“This initiative could serve as a catalyst for the weaponization of space, prompting the development of various systems that have emerged in recent years,” warns Mulvihill.

The concern isn’t solely about US weapons in orbit; it extends to potential responses from other nations, such as Russia, raising the specter of an extensive orbital arms race.

Fueling an Arms Race

Critics like Mulvihill underscore that space-based missile shields could ultimately backfire, making the world less safe. The logic is straightforward: if one side creates a defense system capable of intercepting missiles, the opposing side is likely to retaliate by increasing its missile arsenal to overwhelm those defenses.

“This has been a consistent issue with anti-ballistic missile systems,” Mulvihill points out. “They can be overloaded, as seen in the 1960s and ’70s when both the US and USSR significantly increased their warhead counts.”

All defense systems come with inherent limitations. The Cold War taught us that the goal is often to amass enough warheads to ensure that at least some can reach their targets.

According to Mulbihill, the Golden Dome poses a risk of repeating this cycle on an even larger scale.

read more:

Low Earth Orbit: A Crowded Space

Implementing the Golden Dome would require thousands of new satellites. This space component could involve Starlink-like megaconstellations equipped with interceptor missiles to target ICBMs during the initial launch phase.

That isn’t just ambitious—it’s hazardous.

A 2024 study published in Nature’s Sustainability estimated that there could be over 100,000 low-Earth orbit (LEO) satellites by 2034. According to NASA, there are already more than 25,000 objects greater than 10cm in size, along with approximately 500,000 smaller fragments.

Even in the absence of weapons, navigation in space is becoming increasingly challenging. The addition of thousands of military satellites could dramatically heighten the risk of collisions and debris.

“If one of these interceptors malfunctions or detonates, it doesn’t just result in the loss of a single satellite; it can render entire orbits unusable for years,” warns Mulvihill.

He provides a stark analogy: “In naval warfare, when a ship sinks, the battlefield is abandoned. In space, the debris remains, circling the Earth at incredibly high speeds.”

A rocket launched from Gaza is intercepted on October 9, 2023, by the Israeli Iron Dome near Ashkelon, Israel.

Is the Golden Dome Feasible?

In addition to the geopolitical and environmental concerns, the Golden Dome faces fundamental operational challenges that could hinder its effectiveness.

While it may be capable of intercepting slower threats such as drones and short-range missiles, the difficulties presented by ICBMs are significantly greater.

“Interdicting an ICBM during its boost phase is extraordinarily challenging,” says Mulvihill. “Those missiles are launched from locations that could include central China or central Russia.”

To achieve global coverage within such a limited window, a tremendous number of space-based interceptors would be necessary.

According to a February 2025 Report from the American Physical Society (APS), over 1,000 orbital weapons would be essential to intercept even North Korean ICBMs during their boost phase. For 10 missiles launched in quick succession, around 10,000 interceptors would be required.

The costs entailed would be astronomical, and vulnerability to anti-satellite attacks from countries like Russia adds another layer of complexity. Reports suggest that such developments pose severe risks.

The APS report concludes with cautionary insight: “Even relatively modest numbers of nuclear-armed ICBMs present substantial challenges for creating reliable and effective defenses.”

“An extensive review of published literature highlights that many key challenges identified in developing and deploying efficient ballistic missile defenses are likely to remain unresolved beyond the 15-year timeframe we studied.”

Not Just Another Iron Dome

While the Golden Dome draws its name and inspiration from Israel’s Iron Dome, the comparison is misleading.

“People tend to focus on the success of the Israeli Iron Dome, but we must remember that it’s designed to protect against much lower-altitude projectiles and even some handheld rockets,” asserts Mulvihill. “ICBMs operate in an entirely different arena.”

Despite the ambitious plans for the Golden Dome, Mulvihill remains doubtful about its viability as a serious defense mechanism.

“It seems more like a spectacle fueled by political motives and opportunism from the aerospace industry,” he concludes.

About Our Experts

Michael Mulbihill is a researcher at Teesside University focused on sociotechnical and astrophysical phenomena stemming from nuclear deterrence and space technology. He also serves as the deputy convener for the Military War and Security Research Group and is a member of the Space Cooperative Working Group of the British Association for International Studies.

read more:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Efforts to Bridge the Gap Between Teens and Phone Experts Conclude in Debate

Are teenagers at risk of harm from their smartphones? Experts disagree

Drazen Zigic/Getty Images

Efforts to achieve a scientific agreement concerning the potential risks associated with smartphones and social media among youth have sparked ongoing debates among researchers. This lack of consensus highlights the challenges policymakers face in relying on current evidence to regulate these technologies.

Valerio Capraro from Italy’s University of Milano Bicocca, alongside over 100 colleagues from various disciplines, has launched a “consensus statement” addressing the adverse effects of smartphone usage on teenagers. “Instead of prolonging the debate, we aimed to find common ground among different viewpoints,” Capraro explains.

The team evaluated 26 specific assertions concerning the impact of smartphone use on teens’ mental health. These included concerns that extensive mobile phone use may result in sleep deprivation and behavioral addiction, drawn from the book Anxious Generation by Jonathan Haidt. While this work has significantly shaped discussions surrounding smartphones at New York University, it has also faced substantial criticism. Haidt is a co-author of the statement.

Researchers individually rated their agreement with each assertion and evaluated the robustness of the supporting evidence. Notably, 99% concurred that adolescent mental health has worsened significantly in the US, with similar trends observed in other Western nations. Additionally, 98% acknowledged a strong correlation between heavy smartphone use and sleep disorders. Over 94% identified specific challenges faced by young girls, such as peer comparison, pressure to appear perfect, and exposure to online sexual harassment.

Despite high agreement on these points, experts noted that the evidence merely indicates correlation and not causation. Many believe that further rigorous research, including longitudinal studies tracking smartphone users over time, is necessary to establish causality. In total, over 90% affirmed that there are issues affecting young people, yet only 52% supported implementing policy measures like age restrictions or limitations in schools.

Nevertheless, researchers argue that this does not justify inaction from policymakers. “While obtaining high-quality causal evidence for effective policymaking may take years, decision-makers often need to act quickly in a rapidly evolving landscape with limited data,” they emphasize.

However, scholars not involved in the consensus statement are challenging its findings. It has also drawn backlash over its stance on social media. For instance, Pete Etchells from Bath Spa University in the UK highlighted that out of the 288 invited experts, only approximately 120 engaged in the process. He suggests that those inclined to believe in the negative impact of smartphones are more likely to participate, potentially skewing the results. “I want to clarify the biases present in the expert dataset,” he notes. “I don’t believe this is intentional.”

Etchells, who has also authored a book on the topic, questions the selection process for the invited experts. Sonia Livingstone from the London School of Economics criticizes the chosen researchers for the consensus. “The extensive list was meant to ensure balance, but it predominantly reflects one side of the debate. If science lacks balance, it loses its integrity,” she argues.

Capraro defended the diversity of the panel, stating that “countless individuals are researching these topics worldwide,” making it impractical to reach out to all of them.

Concerns regarding participation have also arisen from Livingstone’s critiques. “The problem lies in the biased nature of the questions posed. They don’t consider,” she points out, “[whether] social media can enhance mental health, friendships, or a sense of belonging?” Capraro maintains that the study aimed to present as many perspectives as possible on this “highly debated topic.”

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Trump Advocates for Increased Birth Rates but Dismisses Fertility Experts

Every year, tens of thousands of young women opt to freeze their eggs. This procedure can be costly and at times painful, with numbers rising as more Americans delay childbirth.

However, many uncertainties surround the process: What is the optimal donor age for egg freezing? What are the success rates? And importantly, how long can frozen eggs remain viable?

Finding reliable answers to these questions is challenging. During the significant downsizing at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Trump administration disbanded a federal research team dedicated to collecting and analyzing data from fertility clinics aimed at enhancing outcomes.

According to Aaron Levine, a professor at Georgia Tech’s Jimmy and Rosalyn Carter School of Public Policy, who collaborated with the CDC team on research, the dismissal of the six team members was “a real, serious loss.”

“They held the most extensive data on fertility clinics, focused on ensuring truthfulness in patient advertising,” stated Barbara Collura, CEO of the National Infertility Association.

Collura emphasized that losing the CDC team is a significant blow to both couples facing infertility and women contemplating egg freezing.

These layoffs come amidst rising political interest in declining U.S. fertility rates. President Trump has dubbed himself the “infertile president” and signed an executive order aimed at expanding access to in vitro fertilization.

“The White House is committed to IVF and remains focused on it,” Collura noted.

With one in seven married or unmarried women experiencing infertility, she remarked, “Looking at these statistics, it’s disheartening—and not surprising—that our public health agencies have chosen to sidestep this issue.”

When asked about the team’s elimination, a health and welfare spokesperson commented that the administration is “in the planning stage” of transitioning maternal health programs to a new Healthy America initiative, offering no further details.

The scientists from the National Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance System were working to address numerous questions surrounding IVF research.

“We lack comprehensive data on the success rates of egg freezing for personal use because it’s relatively new and tricky to track,” Dr. Levine explained.

This uncertainty weighs heavily on women wishing to have children. Simeonne Bookal, who collaborates with Collura at Resolve, froze her eggs in 2018 while waiting to find the right partner.

She got engaged earlier this year, with her wedding scheduled for next spring. At 38, she expressed that having her eggs banked offers her a “security blanket.”

Though she still has reservations about her chances of conceiving, the frozen eggs provide her some assurance.

The precise success rate of the egg freezing procedure remains ambiguous, as many published studies are based on theoretical models that utilize data from infertile patients or egg donors, which differ significantly from women preserving their eggs for future use.

Some studies provide limited insights, often involving fewer than 1,000 women who thaw their eggs and undergo IVF, according to Dr. Sarah Druckenmiller Cascante, a Clinical Assistant Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Nyu Langone and author of a recent review paper on this topic.

“The available data is scant, and it’s crucial to be transparent with patients about this,” she said.

“I wouldn’t regard it as a guaranteed insurance policy. While it could lead to a baby, it’s more about improving the chances of having a biological child later in life, especially if done at a younger age.”

The CDC team maintained a database known as the National ART Surveillance System, established by Congress in 1992. This tracked success rates for various fertility clinics but now faces an uncertain future without continuous updates.

While the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology offers similar databases to researchers, they are not as comprehensive as the CDC’s since they contain data from approximately 85% of U.S. fertility clinics.

According to Sean Tipton, Chief Advocacy and Policy Officer for the American Association of Reproductive Medicine, no dedicated research team oversees the database.

The surge in women opting to bank their eggs for future use has intensified the scrutiny regarding the risks and benefits of freezing eggs.

This procedure was regarded as non-experimental as of 2012. In 2014, only 6,090 patients opted to bank their eggs for fertility preservation. Fast forward to 2022, and that number soared to 28,207, with 39,269 recorded in 2023, the latest year for which data is available.

Source: www.nytimes.com

As Musk Steps Back, Experts Warn Doge Cuts Have Impacted Government Services | Elon Musk

Following Elon Musk’s exit from his role in overseeing the “Government Efficiency” initiative (DOGE), numerous governance analysts express concerns that Doge failed to enhance the quality of services provided by the government to American citizens.

“Across various efforts, we’ve observed significant attempts to influence public policy at the University of Michigan,” noted Donald Moynihan, public policy professor at the university. “Indeed, we have seen a decline in the quality of several government services.”

The world’s richest individual, Musk, was appointed by Donald Trump in January to lead the efficiency initiative but was restricted from serving as a “special government employee” for over 180 days due to his own business challenges.


While Musk claims that Doge has saved $150 billion during his tenure, many budget analysts have raised doubts about the validity of these figures. Musk has repeatedly been accused of exaggerations and false claims regarding savings, which represent just a fraction of the intended $1 trillion cuts.

Moynihan and other experts lament that Musk and Doge predominantly focus on the interests of business leaders aiming to maximize profits, rather than adopting a holistic strategy to enhance service efficiency.

Martha Guin Bell, executive director of Yale Budget Lab, emphasized Musk’s apparent disinterest in service improvement: “They referred to it as the ‘Governmental Slavery Ministry,’” said Gimbel. “There doesn’t seem to be a comprehensive plan to identify areas where government services can genuinely improve. Enhancing these services requires time, investment, and a commitment to building effective solutions.”

When inquired about whether Musk and Doge had improved government services, Zimbel burst into laughter. “Absolutely not,” she remarked. “There’s undeniably a decline in government services.”

Public policy analysts and citizens highlight numerous ways in which the Doge reductions have worsened government services, including longer appointment waits at veterans’ hospitals, extended holding times when calling the IRS, and increased wait times at Social Security offices. The departure of numerous experienced Social Security staff has resulted in much less assistance for welfare inquiries.

During a White House press conference on May 1, Musk defended Doge’s contributions: “I believe we have been effective overall. It may not be as effective as I had hoped, and we could achieve more,” Musk stated. “However, we’ve made advancements.”

Musk conceded that his $1 trillion goal proved to be more challenging than anticipated. “It’s truly about the discomfort the Cabinet and Congress are experiencing,” he remarked. “We can accomplish this, but we must address numerous complaints.”

The White House has not responded to inquiries regarding the decline in certain government services or how Doge has improved them.

Gimbel cautioned that many Americans may not realize the impending decline in government services as tens of thousands of ordered job eliminations unfold. “It’s certainly going to worsen,” she noted. For instance, the government is set to reduce 80,000 positions within the Veterans Affairs Department.

Numerous public policy experts believe Trump and Musk are greatly exaggerating claims of rampant waste, fraud, and abuse within the government, although Zimbel acknowledged that inefficiencies do exist. “There’s definitely room for improvement, and we can pursue it,” she stated. “Government officials are aware of where these inefficiencies lie. Much modernization of technology is needed. Yet, Doge seems uninterested in pursuing these concerns, as well as issues with Medicare and Medicaid over-expenditures.”

Max Stier, president of the Public Services Partnership, a nonprofit research organization, criticized the approach taken by Musk and Doge, likening it to actions of business executives like Jack Welch known for prioritizing cost-cutting over understanding organizational intricacies. Stier lamented that Musk and his team made abrupt cuts without adequate comprehension of the roles and responsibilities of those affected.

Skip past newsletter promotions

“Jack Welch would disapprove of the approach Doge has taken,” Stier remarked. “It’s not solely about saving costs; it disrupts organizational capabilities. Welch never let go of staff without understanding how the organization functions and the competencies of those laid off.”

Stier highlighted Musk’s assertion that Doge was meant to cut costs and enhance organization, stating, “It’s difficult to find a rational basis for the decisions being implemented. Americans certainly witness no improvements.”

“We are compromising the government’s capabilities,” he continued. “It’s evident that people are being let go aggressively, disrupting government services without any comprehension of the outcomes and results. It’s broken. It’s broken. This mindset is not prevalent in Silicon Valley.”

The claim of $150 billion in savings attributed to Musk appears to be a substantial overestimation, as it disregards significant costs associated with the Doge initiative, Stier argued. His group has indicated that due to layoffs, reemployment, retirement benefits, paid leave, and decreased productivity linked to over 100,000 workers, taxpayers are likely to incur $135 billion this year. Several public policy experts believe increased wait times and frustration should also count against the purported $150 billion in savings from Doge reductions.

Moynihan stated that Musk’s vision fundamentally misunderstands the role of government efficiency. “His perspective suggests that government officials are incapable of delivering value,” Moynihan commented. “Consequently, the notion of tools to enhance government services is completely foreign to Musk.”

“It appears he thinks civil servants lack competence, so there’s no harm in cutting their positions,” Moynihan added. “This perspective fails to recognize the importance of public services, their existence, and the benefits they provide to society.”

Moynihan contended that Musk’s approach undermines one of the primary government initiatives of utilizing technology to enhance service and efficiency. He also criticized Musk for contributing to eliminating direct-file options, which offered user-friendly methods for individuals to report taxes, and for plans to file taxes.

Liz Scheller, president of the AFL-CIO, the leading U.S. labor federation, remarked that Doge’s cuts adversely affect workers. She referenced the rapid reductions at the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health, indicating that the agency plays a crucial role in ensuring the safety of personal protective equipment for firefighters.

“Doge essentially cuts line items from a spreadsheet, which has real-life implications for real people,” Shuler said. “Federal workers have been treated with blatant indifference, exhibiting nothing but dehumanization and humiliation.”

Gimbel of Yale Budget Lab cautioned about another significant flaw in Doge’s cuts. “One of the government’s responsibilities is to mitigate risks,” she stated. “Ensuring food safety is one such example. Government inspectors help prevent threats like Listeria or Salmonella. Reducing the number of food inspectors won’t lead to immediate increases in illnesses, but it may enhance the chances of outbreaks like Listeria and Salmonella in the ensuing years.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

State and energy experts unite in new debate to combat federal budget cuts

Scientists, lawmakers, and energy executives have warned that President Trump’s “energy control” agenda will be compromised by abrupt cuts in federal agencies reportedly planned by the Trump administration. Pleas from various quarters have inundated the Cabinet Secretary’s inbox urging them to preserve different departments of the agency. A deadline looms for federal officials to present a new plan for significant budget cuts today, with energy and environment-related agencies expected to bear the brunt.

Experts have cautioned that cuts to the Environmental Protection Agency, the Department of Interior, and the Department of Energy would severely impact efforts to combat climate change. Unfortunately, there seems to be little hope that these concerns will be heeded by Trump administration officials who either deny or disregard the threat of global warming. Instead, the proposed job cuts align with the administration’s priorities, arguing that the cuts jeopardize the expansion of nuclear energy, mineral production, and energy accessibility.

The Department of Energy is expected to face significant losses, particularly in programs like the Clean Energy Demonstration overseeing major projects such as plans to establish seven hydrogen hubs nationwide. Another target is the Loan Program Office, which provides federal funding for clean energy initiatives.

A coalition of energy producers and trade groups representing various sectors like nuclear, data centers, wind and solar energy, and carbon dioxide removal technology expressed concerns that the proposed cuts jeopardize America’s energy and industrial strategies. They highlighted critical projects such as the loan office’s funding for a new nuclear power plant, major lithium mining projects in Nevada, and grid upgrades in Arizona and the Midwest to meet increasing electricity demand from manufacturing.

Additionally, 20 former commissioners and directors of state environmental agencies raised alarm over reports that the EPA intends to eliminate its Scientific Research Division and Research and Development Agency.

EPA administrator Lee Zeldin has announced plans to slash the agency’s budget and workforce by approximately 65%. State officials criticized these cuts, stating that they would hinder the agency’s ability to conduct essential research and uphold its regulatory responsibilities.

They emphasized the pivotal role of the EPA’s science department in addressing issues like PFA removal from drinking water and developing technologies for cleaning toxins from environmental sites.

Democrats on the House Energy Commerce Committee expressed concern over the impact of what they described as “mass cuts” at the EPA. They warned that targeting professional civil servants would endanger public health and impede the agency’s mission to protect human health and the environment.

Reports indicate that thousands of government employees have already resigned, including personnel from agencies like the National Park Service and the Bureau of Land Management. The anonymity was requested to disclose details of the resignations that have not been publicly disclosed by the administration.

Source: www.nytimes.com