Why Billionaires Who Can Reverse Aging for Everyone Still Deny It

Are you dreaming of immortality? There’s a straightforward two-step strategy. First, amass billions in Silicon Valley. Second, invest those billions into unconventional longevity treatments and wait for the results.

This theory seems to circulate among some tech billionaires. Take Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, which is known for ChatGPT. He practices unique routines like staring at bright LED lights while texting in the morning, fasting for 15 hours daily, and taking metformin. This diabetes drug is thought to have potential anti-aging benefits but has rarely been tested on healthy individuals. (I asked ChatGPT, “Should I take metformin to live longer?” and it replied, “Simply put, it’s not a good idea.”)

Then there’s Peter Thiel, the billionaire co-founder of PayPal. He disclosed his involvement in “parabiosis-related research,” a controversial effort utilizing young blood to rejuvenate old animals—and possibly humans in the future. When questioned, Thiel jokingly remarked “I’m not a vampire.”

PayPal and Palantir co-founder Peter Thiel is also making plans to have funds frozen in case of legal death – Credit: Getty

Another player is Brian Johnson, who claims a net worth of around $200 million. Though not as wealthy as others, his extensive social media presence highlights everything from sauna “protocols” to unique gadgets for tracking health metrics. He espouses his “Blueprint” Protocol, which combines a strict diet, intense exercise, numerous supplements, and even gene therapy, claiming to have reversed his biological age and dubbed himself “the healthiest person on Earth.”

California’s wealthiest aren’t alone. LeBron James, a basketball billionaire, reportedly spends $1.5 million a year on health. His regimen includes sessions in a pressurized oxygen tank and cryotherapy at -160°C (-250°F).

The Kardashian family has also prioritized health with full-body MRI scans that claim to detect cancer and other conditions early on. However, these scans are not universally recommended at various medical institutions.

Russian billionaire Dmitry Itskov promotes the 2045 Initiative, a project focused on uploading human consciousness to a computer.

Then there’s 97-year-old billionaire Li Ka-shing, who swears by nicotinamide riboside, an anti-aging supplement. He has invested $25 million into its production company.

What do these various longevity protocols and their ultra-wealthy advocates share? Evidence suggests that no extravagant treatment will extend life significantly beyond the average lifespan.

Fortunately, the proven methods for longer life—such as quitting smoking, improving diet, exercising more, managing stress, and accessing quality healthcare—are accessible and cost-effective.

The real breakthroughs in life extension are unlikely to stem from billionaires experimenting with their bodies; rather, they will emerge from robust scientific research. Unfortunately, many of the wealthy fail to invest in this crucial area.

Follow the Money

To lay out the facts: rich individuals generally do live longer—research demonstrates that the wealthiest 1% in the U.S. live 10-15 years longer than the poorest 1%. This isn’t due to high-tech treatments but rather the basic lifestyle choices mentioned earlier.

Even unlimited financial resources can’t dramatically extend life using existing medical intelligence.

There are numerous intriguing anti-aging investigations exploring treatments for worms, flies, and mice, but these have not advanced to clinical trials for humans yet.

So, while Sam Altman may or may not benefit from metformin, solid proof is still absent.

Additionally, the benefits of metformin remain unclear, while some treatments adopted by “biohackers” might be actively harmful. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a warning in 2019 regarding the dangers of blood transfusions—including potential infections and severe allergic reactions.

Brian Johnson undergoes frequent heart scans to monitor changes in his arteriosclerosis month by month. – Credit: Alamy

Extreme dietary restrictions can lead to complications later, including weakened bones and decreased immunity.

The notorious “supplement stack” comprising random pills, powders, and experimental nutrients, does not enhance lifespan and can lead to contaminants, liver damage, and harmful side effects.

Moreover, combining numerous treatments may produce unexpected interactions, exacerbating individual symptoms despite each ingredient being harmless on its own.

A classic case in healthcare is the interaction of Viagra and specific heart medications, which can result in dangerously low blood pressure, potentially leading to fatalities.

Human biology is notably complex, and it’s easier to disrupt than to repair, much like it’s simpler to impair a car’s engine performance than to enhance it by changing just one component.

Understanding what genuinely works involves not just funds but also rigorous human clinical testing.

The Cost of Immortality

If you’re anxious that billionaires are secretly procuring immortality while the rest of us focus on gym memberships and balanced diets, consider this: most ultra-wealthy individuals aren’t operating under the assumption that groundbreaking anti-aging treatments are just around the corner.

Despite a few notable billionaires partaking in eccentric health practices, their behaviors often indicate disbelief in imminent longevity breakthroughs. For example, thousands of wealthy individuals don’t have more widely circulated stories of unusual longevity interventions.

High-profile figures like Elon Musk have expressed skepticism about the benefits of extended life, even stating, “I have no investment in longevity.” He mentioned in 2024 that a lengthy life could lead to societal stagnation, reinforcing fears regarding extreme longevity.

Musk has noted that individuals typically do not change their perspectives as they age, implying that “no new ideas will succeed” unless people pass away. – Credit: Getty

Even if the ultra-rich (excluding Elon) were secretly accumulating longevity remedies, it’s unlikely they would bypass serious investment in longevity research if they genuinely believed in its potential.

Hiding sizable investments is nearly impossible, given the spotlight on funding rounds for biotech startups and the necessity of recruiting outstanding scientists from within academia.

So just how many billionaires are investing in longevity science? One noteworthy venture is the Altos Research Institute, a notable startup focusing on rejuvenating cells. With initial funding of $3 billion, estimates suggest that it is partly backed by Jeff Bezos. Altos gained attention when it enlisted Nobel Prize-winning scientist Shinya Yamanaka, known for pioneering work in reprogramming adult cells into a stem cell-like state.

Jeffrey Bezos’s investment in Altos Labs aims to rejuvenate cells and tackle aging’s root causes – Credit: Getty

While $3 billion is substantial, it’s only a fraction of Bezos’s net worth of approximately $270 billion in 2026. If he believed that longevity science would grant immortality, one would expect a higher percentage of his wealth to be redirected toward it.

True Aging Remedy

The irony is that billionaires aiming for longevity would likely achieve better results by funding expansive scientific trials instead of personally dabbling in unproven treatments.

Currently, research on aging lacks adequate funding, receiving merely about 20 times less governmental support than cancer research, even though aging is a primary cause of many cancers.

Despite high-profile investments in firms like Altos Labs, aging research constitutes a minor aspect of overall biotech funding.

This is especially surprising since surveys suggest that many billionaires would willingly give away a substantial part of their fortunes for an additional decade of health. One study estimates that the combined wealth of the world’s billionaires is about $20 trillion.

Research indicates metformin shows great promise for lifespan extension, but further study is essential to validate its efficacy – Credit: Getty

Half of that total amounts to $10 trillion, potentially exceeding the historical investment in health research. Ultimately, if just a fraction of the world’s billionaires invested in longevity science, both they and average citizens could see healthier, longer lives.

That’s the critical insight: once developed, anti-aging treatments will not only reach the affluent.

Returning to Sam Altman’s metformin habit, it’s a generic drug costing only a few cents per tablet, rather than an exorbitantly priced elixir. The reason it isn’t readily available isn’t financial but rather due to the lack of substantial trials—estimated at around $45-70 million—to determine its legitimacy as an anti-aging treatment.

This lack of trials partly results from the drug’s low cost; no one stands to profit significantly from inexpensive, mass-produced medications.

If governmental bodies or a select group of philanthropic billionaires could allocate funds, even a one-off investment of tens of millions could potentially extend the healthy life spans of billions globally—including the billionaires backing the research.

A single billion dollars could support 10 to 20 trials on drugs like metformin. Other promising candidates include rapamycin, diabetes medications like acarbose and canagliflozin, and “senolytic” drugs that eliminate aging cells. It seems highly probable that at least one of these will enhance health and longevity.

The U.S. intervention testing program, which has identified and tested many of these drugs in rodents, operates on an annual budget that is merely double what Brian Johnson spends each year on health.

So, if you’re a billionaire or even a centibillionaire reading this, consider stepping away from extravagance and opening your checkbook to fund the science capable of helping millions—including yourself—enjoy longer, healthier lives.

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Billionaires Should Be Prohibited from Geoengineering the Planet

Shutterstock/John D. Sahlin

Addressing climate change is a fundamentally collective effort. We share a single planet and atmosphere, meaning every emission of greenhouse gases impacts us all.

Notably, a small percentage of individuals have a disproportionate impact. The wealthiest 1% globally account for one-fifth of total emissions since 1990. A voluntary reduction in carbon footprints by the affluent could yield significant global benefits.

However, given our understanding of human behavior, such an outcome seems unlikely. But what if the affluent sought to balance carbon outputs through financing geoengineering projects designed to cool the planet? As explored in an exclusive survey of climate scientists (see “Exclusive: Climate scientists expect attempts to dim the sun by 2100”), there are unpredictable risks associated with such initiatives, potentially leading to adverse effects like droughts or ozone depletion.

Thus, if we are to engage in atmospheric modification, it must be pursued collectively. At present, there are no barriers preventing individuals or factions from attempting to unilaterally cool the Earth. This is why over 80% of respondents in our survey advocate for a global treaty to regulate potential climate interventions.


The wealthiest 1% globally account for one-fifth of total emissions.

Such a treaty would be among the many necessary updates to global governance in our era. Another domain where affluent individuals can exert significant influence is the night sky, which is increasingly cluttered with satellites that negatively affect the atmosphere (see How worried should we be about toxic chemicals from dead satellites?). With no global restrictions on satellite launches, the number has surged into the thousands, primarily driven by Elon Musk’s Starlink initiative.

International agreements lack the allure of dramatic, high-tech solutions often envisioned in science fiction, making it challenging to win support from billionaires. However, if they wish to contribute positively, endorsing international law would be a constructive starting point.

Source: www.newscientist.com

Democrats are targeting popular, unelected billionaires like Elon Musk in a shooting training exercise

During most of the 17-minute interview, Elon Musk adhered to his agenda. He portrayed himself as a tech-savvy individual on a mission to “eliminate waste and fraud” in government.

Despite the significant backlash he faced, Musk claimed that his cost-cutting initiatives had made substantial progress, as he shared with Fox business commentator Larry Kudrow. He emphasized his goal to prevent America from going bankrupt.

However, Kudlow pushed Musk to consider the future. Would the concept of “government efficiency” (DOGE) still be relevant in a year? Musk acknowledged that his task was not entirely complete. He pointed to federal programs that support retirees, disabled individuals, and other social safety net initiatives as areas where significant spending could be reduced.

While Trump and Republicans have traditionally considered programs like Social Security, Medicaid, and Medicare as untouchable, Musk suggested they could become key targets for cuts, sparking backlash from Democrats.

Democrats criticized Musk for proposing cuts to programs that many vulnerable Americans depend on. Musk’s statements led to concerns about the potential loss of essential government services and benefits.

Despite the pushback, Musk received praise from Trump and Republicans for his work, but signs of concern among Republicans were becoming apparent.

In light of Musk’s proposals, Democrats and critics highlighted the potential negative impact on retirees and vulnerable Americans. Musk’s rhetoric around waste and fraud in federal programs drew skepticism from both sides of the political spectrum.

The White House issued a fact check in defense of Musk’s comments, emphasizing his commitment to eliminating waste while protecting American interests. Republicans also clarified that they were not considering cuts to Social Security, Medicare, or Medicaid.

As tensions and concerns around Musk’s proposals grew, Democrats wrestled with how to address his influence. Musk’s impact on various government programs and policies sparked a broader debate about the role of billionaires in shaping American politics.

The ongoing debate surrounding Musk’s involvement in government initiatives has raised concerns among Americans from diverse political backgrounds. The future of Musk’s influence and the implications of his proposals remain uncertain.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Introducing the Billionaire’s Unconventional and Lavish Doomsday Bunker

Have you ever considered what your doomsday plan would entail? If not, you’re not alone. While most people are more concerned with what’s for dinner tomorrow than surviving the apocalypse, billionaires have already thought ahead.

Instead of spending millions on extending their lifespans, reversing aging, or planning space trips, the ultra-rich are now investing in giant underground shelters to prepare for the end of the world. These luxurious bunkers offer comfortable living conditions below the surface, away from the chaos above.

While doomsday bunkers are not a new concept, recent trends show that billionaire bunkers are becoming increasingly extravagant. From zombie-proof fire moats to 10-car garages, these shelters cater to the highest levels of luxury. It seems fitting, considering they will likely be located underground.

But what exactly are the ultra-rich preparing for? And what do these apocalyptic shelters look like?

undefined

What are they preparing for?

Once seen as odd and paranoid, those who invest in shelters now have valid concerns about the future. The rise of artificial intelligence, pandemics, and global warming has instilled fear in many, even among the wealthiest individuals.

According to Douglas Rushkoff, a billionaire and writer who focuses on doomsday scenarios, the ultra-rich are not driven by fear but by desire. They see isolation in space stations or underground shelters as a reward for their accomplishments. It’s about winning the game of life and building the best shelter, not merely preparing for worst-case scenarios.

What do these bunkers look like?

End-of-life shelters come in various sizes, luxury levels, and features. Some are as small as a single room, while others resemble small apartments with amenities like garages, gyms, and saunas. The top-tier bunkers designed for billionaires include added rooms, tanks, and other necessary items, driving up prices significantly.

For many wealthy individuals, owning an island with a grand mansion on the surface conceals a maze of rooms underground for emergency situations. These bunkers serve as highly secure vacation homes with additional features for survival.

Will we all soon have bunkers?

While shelters were once exclusive to the ultra-rich and paranoid, the trend is shifting. Newer firms offer shelter options for a broader demographic, making it more accessible to average individuals. Popular group bunkers reminiscent of games like Fallout are also on the rise, accommodating large groups at a fraction of the cost of individual bunkers.

Architect Dante Vicino describes these group bunkers as underground cruise ships, with private and communal spaces for residents to gather, eat, and relax together. While luxury shelters may offer comfort during doomsday scenarios, building connections with neighbors and forming a community may be a more realistic survival strategy.


About our experts

Douglas Rushkoff is a writer and documentarian who has researched billionaire behavior and attitudes regarding doomsday scenarios.

Dante Vicino is the project lead at Vivos, a doomsday shelter company specializing in affordable alternatives.

Read more:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com