Continuing to Work Beyond Retirement Age Can Enhance Your Life Satisfaction

Working later in life may not be a bad thing

Kelvin Murray/Getty Images Source: Stone RF

While many anticipate retirement, staying active in the workforce during later years can enhance your happiness—particularly for men.

Increasing numbers of people are extending their careers. According to a report from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 28.9% of individuals aged 65 to 69 across 38 member countries were still employed in 2023, up from 15.9% in 2000. However, the overall effects on well-being remain largely unexplored.

To delve into this topic, Alisa Lewin from Haifa University and Haya Stear from Tel Aviv University analyzed social survey data from Israel’s Central Bureau of Statistics. They compared the experiences of over 3,300 women and more than 2,000 men who reached 62 and 67 years of age, respectively.

The researchers found that individuals with lower household incomes were more inclined to work full-time. Notably, the men reported financial, family, emotional, and overall life satisfaction levels that were equal to or exceeded those who were not employed.

This trend held true regardless of the nature of their full-time employment. Meanwhile, women showed an increase in family and economic satisfaction.

Researchers suggest this phenomenon may stem from the idea that women could derive a sense of purpose and fulfillment from various life aspects. “Women may find emotional support and social engagement from other sources rather than relying solely on their jobs,” Lewin explains.

“Men, even today, still recognize their responsibilities in providing for their families and achieving workplace success,” notes Carrie Cooper from the University of Manchester, UK.

Results concerning the happiness of participants working part-time were more variable. Outcomes differed based on job type, satisfaction metrics, and participant gender.

Those who began with higher happiness levels tended to work full-time later in life, which could have influenced the findings. Cooper cautions that the results may not be applicable to other cultures or countries.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Research claims that Facebook is continuing to experiment with users in a bizarre manner

Understanding the true nature of social media reveals that platforms like Facebook and Instagram are primarily profit-driven businesses that rely on advertising revenue. While we benefit from staying connected and entertained, we must also acknowledge the underlying business model.

Most users accept targeted ads as a trade-off for accessing online content. However, the issue arises when algorithms, rather than human decision-makers, dictate the ads we see. These automated systems are designed to prioritize clicks and sales, raising concerns about transparency and ethics.

A recent study highlighted the use of A/B tests by Facebook and Google to analyze user responses to different ad versions. Such experiments play a crucial role in marketing strategies, but the way they are conducted matters.

The problem lies in the lack of random assignment in these tests, as algorithms actively select users based on predicted engagement levels. This approach hinders advertisers from gaining genuine insights into effective ad strategies, relying instead on algorithmic optimization.

As of April 2025, Facebook has approximately 3.065 billion active users each month worldwide. Photo Credit: Getty

Advertisers may inadvertently target specific demographics, leading to unintended consequences like gender bias and political polarization. The complexity and accuracy of algorithms enable microtargeting at an individual level, shaping online experiences and influencing user behavior.

Implications for Users

Being online means being subject to constant experimentation by algorithms that determine content exposure. Users are unknowingly part of these experiments, where personalized messages influence thoughts, purchases, and beliefs.

It is crucial to recognize the impact of algorithmic decision-making on online experiences and be aware of the curated messages we receive. Transparency and accountability in digital platforms remain essential for fostering an informed online environment.

Expert Insights

Jan Cornil is an associate professor at the UBC Sauder School of Business in Canada, specializing in consumer behavior and marketing research. His work has been featured in top academic journals, emphasizing the importance of ethical marketing practices.

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Elon Musk’s “declaration of war” does not deter anti-hate group from continuing its activities

A British-founded anti-hate speech campaign group involved in Labor’s interference in the US election has pledged to continue its efforts despite Elon Musk’s recent aggressive stance against the party.

The Center to Combat Digital Hate faced criticism from wealthy individuals this week after accusing Musk of violating laws against foreign interference in US elections.

Imran Ahmed, Founder and CEO of CCDH, stated: “We’re not backing down. We will persist in our mission through advocacy and research.”

Musk’s allegations were based on a report that highlighted connections between Labor Together and CCDH, a think tank once led by Keir Starmer’s chief of staff Morgan McSweeney.

Musk shared a report link on his social media platform, claiming, “This is war.” Musk previously attempted unsuccessfully to sue CCDH earlier this year.

President Donald Trump’s campaign filed a complaint against the Labor Party for alleged interference in the election by supporting Democratic candidate Kamala Harris. Mr. Starmer mentioned that party leaders volunteered to assist the Harris campaign in their spare time.

The complaint also mentioned that McSweeney and Downing Street communications director Matthew Doyle attended the Democratic convention in Chicago and met with the Harris campaign team.

In response to Musk’s actions, Mr. Ahmed stated, “Elon Musk has a history of targeting non-partisan organizations like us. This is not the first time we have been attacked by him.”

Mr. Ahmed, a former Labor Party aide, clarified that McSweeney assisted in establishing CCDH but had no operational role in the organization. He emphasized their commitment to their mission and bipartisan collaborations.

Musk’s recent criticism of CCDH followed the publication of an internal report by the organization. Disinformation Chronicle Newsletter revealed that combating misinformation on Musk’s platform was deemed a strategic priority for CCDH.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Mr. Ahmed clarified that ‘Kill Musk’s Twitter’ was used as shorthand to address Musk’s business model, emphasizing their commitment to combating misinformation.

Mr. Ahmed’s background in the Labor Party and his creation of CCDH in response to hate crimes demonstrate his dedication to fighting extremism and misinformation.

Mr. X has been contacted for further comment.

Source: www.theguardian.com