Are You the Same Person Every Day? Discover the Surprising Findings of This Brain Experiment

Your ability to cultivate a stable and consistent sense of self is nothing short of remarkable.

Throughout our lives, we encounter significant transformations, evolving from infants to adults—acquiring new knowledge, forgetting some, forming fresh relationships, and letting go of old ones. These experiences are interspersed with vivid dreams and fleeting moments each night.

Yet, amidst all these changes, we continue to perceive ourselves as the same individuals. This phenomenon can be attributed to the ongoing developmental processes within the brain, which is more adaptable and delicate than you might think.

Classic studies from the late 20th century, such as those involving cases where half of the brain was severed as a radical epilepsy treatment, illustrate this concept.

Interestingly, these cases exhibited strange consequences, like patients performing contradictory movements, such as lifting a button with one hand while undoing it with the other. Nevertheless, they still maintained a coherent sense of self.

These individuals even crafted explanations for their unusual behaviors, demonstrating that their brains were actively working to create a unified personal narrative.

In healthy individuals, psychological studies have revealed memory patterns that bolster this constructed identity.

For instance, we tend to remember and reflect on experiences that align with our self-perception. If you identify as an introvert, you may find it easier to recall and emphasize past memories that resonate with that identity.

Essentially, you are curating your personal autobiography to fit your current self-concept.

The medial prefrontal cortex, located at the front of the brain just behind the forehead, plays a crucial role in regulating this structure.

Research indicates that when people identify traits that best describe themselves—whether in the present or future—this brain region is significantly more active than when they assess similar qualities in others.

Our constructed sense of self also extends to our possessions. During brain scans, the medial prefrontal cortex shows increased activity when individuals view their belongings, while this response diminishes for unfamiliar items.

This illustrates how quickly and adaptively our brains reshape our personal boundaries.

Our sense of self extends to our possessions – Image credit: Robin Boyden

Memory processes are also vital in this ongoing construction of self.

Damage to the hippocampus, located deep within the brain alongside the temples, can prevent individuals from envisioning their past or future—highlighting how reliant our identity is on active brain functions.

Not only does your brain construct a sense of self over time, but it also maintains it spatially, providing a stable sense of ownership over your body.

Another critical region, known as the temporoparietal junction (located behind the ear), significantly influences this aspect of identity.

A study conducted in 2005 demonstrated that electrically stimulating this brain area during surgery could induce out-of-body experiences in patients, making them feel as though they were floating outside themselves.

Thus, while our sense of a stable self often feels entirely convincing, it can be disrupted by brain injuries or even by carefully orchestrated neural experiments.

Overall, the evidence suggests that our experience of “me-ness” is a constructed phenomenon, tirelessly maintained by the brain.


This article answers the question posed by Southampton’s Frank Ross: “How does my brain create a sense of self?”

If you have any inquiries, please reach out via email at: questions@sciencefocus.com or send us a message Facebook, Twitter or Instagram (remember to include your name and location).

Explore our ultimate fun facts and discover more amazing science pages.


Read more:


Source: www.sciencefocus.com

2025: The Controversial Experiment That Might Threaten the Multiverse

Exploring the Multiverse: Insights into Quantum Behavior

Victor de Schwamberg/Science Photo Library

A groundbreaking physics experiment published this year reported measuring single photons in two locations simultaneously, an assertion that challenges the multiverse theory. While many physicists express skepticism, the researchers staunchly defend their findings.

In May, Holger Hoffman and his team from Hiroshima University revealed results from a refined version of the iconic double-slit experiment. Their findings indicate that individual photons are “delocalized,” suggesting they cannot be confined to one location.

The initial double-slit experiments, conducted in 1801, demonstrated that shining light through two narrow slits onto a screen resulted in a wavy interference pattern. This phenomenon persists even when photons are emitted one at a time, implying that a single photon can behave like a wave—a point of contention among physicists regarding the nature of single photons and measurement.

When referencing a quantum particle as wavelike, this typically pertains to its wave function, a mathematical representation of all potential locations the particle might occupy.

These potential states exist in a layered configuration until a measurement is made—a concept known as superposition. Most physicists contend that measuring a particle collapses its wave function from superposition to a singular state.

One way to understand this is to propose the existence of multiple overlapping universes, each allowing photons to navigate different paths, with potential interference between photons from these separate universes, a concept referred to as the “many-worlds” interpretation.

However, Hoffman and his collaborators argue that their experiments provide concrete evidence that photons traverse both slits, demonstrating the wave function as more than just a mathematical abstraction—it serves as a depiction of reality, countering the idea of a multiverse.

Nevertheless, many physicists have expressed concern regarding the team’s methodology, suggesting that repeated statistical measurements cannot adequately determine a particle’s attributes. “I don’t believe you can draw conclusions about a single photon based on this,” stated Andrew Jordan at Chapman University in California, discussing the report with New Scientist.

The assertion that these experiments could resolve foundational issues in quantum mechanics has been met with considerable skepticism, according to Hoffman, partially due to the innovative nature of their measurement techniques.

“We’re challenging traditional views,” Hoffman explained, noting that existing interpretations of quantum mechanics usually presume that measured values and their mathematical representations depict reality. “The many-worlds interpretation is essentially the most extreme extension of that presumption,” he added.

Hoffman asserts that their investigation reveals that mathematical wave functions do not embody reality; the only true reality is what can be measured. “Although superposition suggests that a state might be defined by hypothetical measurements, actual experimental data contradicts this broader interpretation,” he elaborated.

Despite facing difficulties in publishing their findings, Hoffman and his team have been invited to present their research to various academic groups and are actively refining their work. “We anticipated some resistance. If this endeavor were straightforward, it wouldn’t be worthwhile. Altering one’s perspective takes considerable effort,” Hoffman concluded.

Topics:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Quantum Experiment Resolves Century-Long Debate Between Einstein and Bohr

SEI 276622262

Double-slit experiment showcases the quantum nature of reality

Russell Kightley/Science Photo Library

A thought experiment that sparked a famous debate between physicists Albert Einstein and Niels Bohr in 1927 has now been realized. This breakthrough addresses one of quantum physics’ fundamental mysteries: is light truly a wave, a particle, or an intricate mix of both?

The debate centers on the double-slit experiment, tracing back another century to 1801, when Thomas Young used it to argue for the wave nature of light, while Einstein contended it is a particle. Bohr’s contributions to quantum physics suggested that both perspectives could hold true. Einstein, critical of this notion, designed a modified version of Young’s experiment to counter it.

<p>Recently, <a href="https://quantum.ustc.edu.cn/web/en/node/137">Chaoyan Lu</a> and his team at the University of Science and Technology of China utilized cutting-edge technology in experimental physics to verify Einstein's theories, demonstrating the unique dual wave-particle character of quantum objects, as theorized in the 1920s. "Witnessing quantum mechanics 'in action' at such a foundational level is awe-inspiring," remarks Lu.</p>
<p>In the classic double-slit experiment, light is directed at two narrow parallel slits in front of a screen. If light were entirely particles, the screen would display a distinct light blob behind each slit. However, researchers observed an "interference pattern" of alternating dark and bright bands instead. This demonstrates that light behaves like waves passing through a slit, creating ripples that collide on the screen. Notably, this interference pattern remains evident even when the light intensity is reduced to a single photon. Does this imply that photons, which exhibit particle-like behavior, also interfere like waves?</p>
<p>Bohr proposed the idea of "complementarity," stating that one cannot simultaneously observe the particle nature of a photon showing wave-like behavior, and vice versa. Amid discussions on this matter, Einstein envisioned an additional spring-loaded slit that would compress when a photon entered. By analyzing the movement of the spring, physicists could determine which slit a photon passed through. Einstein believed this approach allowed for a simultaneous description of both particle and wave behavior, creating an interference pattern that contradicts complementarity.</p>
<section></section>
<p>Lu's team aimed to create a setup at the "ultimate quantum limit," firing a single photon rather than using a slit, but rather an atom that could recoil similarly. Upon impacting the atom, the photon entered a quantum state that allowed it to propagate left and right, which also produced an interference pattern upon reaching the detector. To achieve this, researchers utilized lasers and electromagnetic forces to significantly cool the atoms, enabling precise control over their quantum properties. This was vital for testing Bohr's claims against Einstein's. Bohr argued that Heisenberg's uncertainty principle could disrupt the interference pattern when momentum fluctuations of the slit due to recoil are well known, rendering the photon’s position highly ambiguous, and vice versa.</p>
<p>"Bohr's response was brilliant, but such thought experiments remained theoretical for almost a century," notes Lu.</p>

<p>By adjusting the laser, Lu's team could control the momentum uncertainty of the atoms as they slitted. They found that Bohr was indeed correct; finely tuning these momentum ambiguities could eliminate interference patterns. Remarkably, the team could access intermediate regions to measure recoil information, observing blurred versions of interference patterns. Essentially, the photon displayed both wave and particle characteristics simultaneously, according to Lu.</p>
<p>``The real intrigue lies in [this] intermediate realm," states <a href="https://physics.mit.edu/faculty/wolfgang-ketterle/">Wolfgang Ketterle</a> from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Early this year, he and his team conducted a variation of Einstein's experiment, using ultracold atoms controlled by lasers that could pass through two slits. Lu's group utilized a single atom to scatter light in two directions; both atoms scattered light in the same direction, and changes in its quantum state indicated the influence of the photons colliding with each atom. Ketterle emphasizes that this approach provides a distinct means to explore wave-particle duality, offering clearer insights into photon behavior since this "which direction" information is recorded in one of the two separate atoms, albeit deviating slightly from Einstein's premise.</p>
<p>Furthermore, he and his colleagues performed experiments where they abruptly switched off the laser (similar to removing a spring from a moving slit) and subsequently directed photons at the atoms. Bohr's conclusions held, as the uncertainty principle impacted the momentum exchange between atoms and photons, potentially "washing out" the interference fringes. This spring-free iteration of Einstein's concept had remained untested until now, according to Ketterle. "Nuclear physics presents an excellent opportunity to apply cold atoms and lasers for a clearer illustration of quantum mechanics, a possibility not achievable before."</p>

<p><a href="https://physik.unibas.ch/en/persons/philipp-treutlein/">Philip Treutlein</a> and his colleagues at the University of Basel in Switzerland assert that both experiments strongly reinforce fundamental aspects of quantum mechanics. "From our modern perspective, we understand how quantum mechanics operates on a microscopic level. Yet witnessing the empirical realization of these principles is always impactful." The experiments led by Lu align conceptually with historical records of the debates between Bohr and Einstein, affirming that quantum mechanics behaves as predicted.</p>
<p>For Lu, there remains more work on categorizing the quantum state of the slit and increasing its mass. However, the experiment carries significant educational importance. "Above all, I hope to illustrate the sheer beauty of quantum mechanics," he shares. "If more young individuals witness the real-time emergence and disappearance of interference patterns and think, 'Wow, this is how nature functions,' then the experiment will already be a success."</p>

<section class="ArticleTopics" data-component-name="article-topics">
    <p class="ArticleTopics__Heading">topic:</p>
</section>

Source: www.newscientist.com

New Experiment Reveals Moss Can Endure Long-Term Exposure to Space Elements

A group of Japanese scientists conducted experiments on the model moss species protenema (larval mosses), brood cells (specialized stem cells activated under stress), and sporophytes (protected spores). They investigated Physcomitrium patent to identify the most resilient spores under simulated space conditions, which were then sent to the external environment of the International Space Station (ISS). After nine months in space, over 80% of the spores survived and maintained their capacity to germinate. These findings highlight the potential of land plants like Physcomitrium patent to endure extreme environments when studied in space.



Physcomitrium patent spores demonstrate remarkable resilience to simulated space conditions. Image credit: Meng et al., doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.113827.

With the recent rapid changes in the global environment, exploring new avenues for the survival of life beyond Earth has become essential.

Understanding how Earth-origin organisms adapt to extreme and unfamiliar conditions, such as those found in space, is crucial for expanding human habitats on the Moon and Mars.

Researching the survival limits of organisms in both terrestrial and extraterrestrial conditions enhances our comprehension of their adaptability and prepares us for the challenges of ecosystem maintenance.

“Most living organisms, including humans, cannot endure even a brief exposure to the vacuum of space,” explains Dr. Tomomichi Fujita, a researcher at Hokkaido University.

“Yet, the moss spores maintained their vitality even after nine months of direct exposure.”

“This offers astonishing evidence that life forms evolved on Earth possess unique cellular mechanisms to withstand the challenges of space.”

In this study, Dr. Fujita and colleagues examined Physcomitrium patent, a well-studied moss commonly referred to as spread earth moss, under simulated space conditions, which included high levels of ultraviolet radiation, extreme temperature fluctuations, and vacuum settings.

They assessed three structures: Physcomitrium patent — protenema, brood cell, and sporophyte — to determine which is best suited for survival in space.

“We anticipated that the combination of space-related stressors, like vacuum, cosmic radiation, extreme temperature changes, and microgravity, would result in greater damage than any isolated stressor,” remarked Dr. Fujita.

The research revealed that UV light posed the greatest threat to survival, with sporophytes exhibiting the highest resilience among the three moss structures.

Young moss could not tolerate elevated UV levels or extreme temperatures.

Although brood cell viability was significant, the encased spores demonstrated a resistance to UV light that was 1,000 times greater.

These spores survived and germinated after enduring temperatures as low as -196 degrees Celsius for over a week and withstanding heat up to 55 degrees Celsius for a month.

The scientists proposed that the protective structures surrounding the spores may absorb UV light while physically and chemically shielding the spores inside from damage.

This resilience is likely the result of evolutionary adaptations. Moss plants, which evolved from aquatic to terrestrial species approximately 500 million years ago, have survived multiple mass extinctions.

In March 2022, the researchers sent hundreds of sporophytes aboard the Cygnus NG-17 spacecraft to the ISS.

Upon arrival, astronauts affixed the sporophyte samples to the ISS’s exterior, exposing them to space for a total of 283 days.

The spores made their return trip to Earth aboard SpaceX CRS-16, which was returned to the laboratory for analysis in January 2023.

“We had anticipated the survival rate to be nearly zero, but the results were the opposite: the majority of spores survived,” said Dr. Fujita.

“We were truly astounded by the remarkable durability of these tiny plant cells.”

Over 80% of the spores successfully completed the intergalactic journey, with nearly all of them—except for 11%—able to germinate upon returning to the lab.

The research team measured chlorophyll levels in the spores, discovering that all types exhibited normal levels, apart from a 20% reduction in chlorophyll a. Though chlorophyll a is sensitive to changes in light, this decrease did not appear to hinder the spores’ health.

“This study exemplifies the incredible resilience of life that has developed on Earth,” said Dr. Fujita.

Curious about the duration spores could survive in space, the researchers utilized pre- and post-expedition data to formulate a mathematical model.

They projected that the encased spores could endure up to 5,600 days, or around 15 years, under space conditions.

However, they emphasize that this estimate requires further validation through larger datasets to more accurately assess how long moss can thrive in space.

“Ultimately, we hope that this research paves the way for developing ecosystems in extraterrestrial environments like the Moon and Mars,” Dr. Fujita concluded.

“We desire that our moss research can serve as a foundation.”

For further details, refer to the published paper in iscience.

_____

Meng Chang Hyun et al. The extreme environmental resistance and space survivability of moss, Physcomitrium patent. iscience, published online on November 20, 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.113827

Source: www.sci.news

NASA’s Asteroid Deflection Experiment Yields Surprising and Mysterious Outcomes

The NASA DART probe, depicted on the upper right, is on a trajectory to collide with the asteroid Dimorphos, shown on the left.

Steve Gribben/Johns Hopkins APL/NASA/AP/ALAMY

Following the collision of NASA’s spacecraft with an asteroid, its orbit is expected to change gradually next month, leaving astronomers puzzled.

In 2022, the Double Asteroid Redirect Test (DART) sent a nearly 600-kilometer spacecraft towards a small asteroid known as Dimorphos.

Prior to the collision, Dimorphos completed an orbit every 11 hours and 55 minutes. Observations soon indicated that the impact shortened this orbital period by approximately 30 minutes, although in the following weeks and months, the orbital period diminished by an additional 30 seconds.

Astronomers have proposed that this phenomenon might be due to the release of small debris during the impact, which could gradually cause energy loss and result in a reduced orbital path.

Recently, Harrison Agrusa and Camille Chattanette from the University of Côte d’Azur in Nice, France, asserted that debris ejection cannot solely explain the observations.

“The boulders can be flung by Dimorphos, leading to a wider dispersion. This momentum will eventually revert and be transferred back to Dimorphos,” Agrusa explains.

Agrusa theorizes that a more plausible reason for Dimorphos’ shifting trajectory is that its impact affects its rotation in a complex manner, causing rocks on its surface to shift. The friction generated by these rocks could lead to heat production from their collisions. The resultant energy loss as heat might clarify the decrease in the asteroid’s orbital path, although this study has not modeled that aspect.

“When you rearrange materials on a surface, you’re altering the gravitational potential energy of Dimorphos itself,” Agrusa states. “This adjustment could feasibly slow down the orbital period within a month, as this would be a prolonged process.”

This highlights the challenges in predicting how asteroid orbits will alter post-impact, yet according to Agrusa, this phenomenon is less concerning when deflecting an asteroid heading towards Earth. This is because binary asteroid systems like Didymos and Dimorphos are quite uncommon, making it unlikely that similar effects will occur for a solitary asteroid orbiting the Sun.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

This New Experiment Could Bridge the Gaps in Our Theories

Humanity is now closer to developing an inclusive “all theories” framework to explain the physical universe. A new paper has been published in PRX Quantum.

Three scientists from the US have designed an experiment they believe can bridge the gap between quantum mechanics and Einstein’s general theory of relativity.

Quantum Mechanics elucidates the physics of the subatomic realm, while General Relativity addresses the large-scale universe, encompassing the physics of space, time, and gravity. Unfortunately, the two theories do not align.

“Both quantum theory and Einstein’s gravity theory have undergone rigorous testing and perform exceptionally well,” stated Dr. Igor Pikovsky, an assistant professor of physics at the Stevens Institute in New Jersey, as reported by BBC Science Focus.

“However, one of the greatest challenges in modern physics is to unify these two theories into a single coherent framework. So far, such a joint theory remains elusive.”

Pikovsky, along with Dr. Jacob Coby from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, and Dr. Johannes Borlegaard from Harvard University, has conceived an experiment to elucidate how these two theories can coexist—an achievement that has never been accomplished before.

The goal? To uncover how quantum effects respond to the curvature of space-time.

The curvature of space-time, as described by Einstein, posits that gravity results from the bending of space and time around massive objects (like planets), causing time to pass more slowly closer to these objects.

Scientists have engineered atomic clock systems interconnected within quantum networks, demonstrating how they are influenced by curved space-time.

Atomic clocks are capable of measuring time with remarkable precision. Through a phenomenon known as entanglement, these quantum states can be interconnected, and the superposition principle allows clocks to experience multiple timeframes simultaneously, due to the unique property of existing in various states at once.

By situating these clocks in diverse locations, the quantum network can identify minute variations in time movement caused by the gravitational distortion of space-time.

“If successful, such a test would represent the inaugural assessment of the ‘quantum theory of curved space-time,’ shedding light on how quantum systems behave within the framework of Einstein’s gravity,” Pikovsky remarked.

Scientists are racing to develop quantum networks to enable future quantum internets that can connect quantum computers globally – credit: via Sakkmesterke

This experiment marks a crucial initial step in testing how these theories might be unified, relying on existing technology.

Pikovsky expressed hope that the paper would kindle “interest and excitement about the numerous mysteries that nature still holds.”

He added:

“Our findings indicate that quantum technology can be harnessed to address some of these questions through real-world experiments for the first time.”

Read more:

About our experts

Dr. Igor Pikovsky is an assistant professor of physics at the Stevens Institute in New Jersey, USA. He earned his PhD in Quantum Mechanics from the University of Vienna in 2014. His current research focuses on quantum phenomena, quantum fundamentals, and quantum information science.

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

The Year’s Most Impactful Science Experiment: 14 Captivating Images

The finest science is not just intelligent—it’s extraordinary. Don’t take our word for it! For 28 years, Wellcome has hosted its annual photography competition, showcasing impactful images that highlight health, science, and medicine.

The Wellcome Photography Prize delves into various topics, including mental health care and the everyday experiences of living with disabilities. This year, we’re thrilled to reintroduce the biomedical imaging category, offering a chance to appreciate the beauty of science alongside intricate medical visuals. Additional categories include “Solo Photography” and “Storytelling Series.”

Among the highlights is the first non-invasive image of microplastics buried within human skin and a poignant journey to the Peruvian Andes, where Indigenous farmers combine traditional wisdom with innovative science to combat water pollution.

The winners will be unveiled on July 16th, 2025, followed by a free public exhibition at the Francis Crick Institute in London from July 17th to October 18th.

A total of 25 images have secured the prestigious top prize this year. And here’s our favorite.

Blooming Barrier by Lucy Holland

Tissue samples taken from infants affected by Hirschsprung’s disease, a condition impacting goblet cell development and leading to long-term digestive issues. – Photo Credit: Lucy Holland/Wellcome Photography Prize 2025

From Butterflies to Humans by Amaia Alcalde Anton

This image captures the brain of a metamorphosing butterfly, where new neurons are generated through neurogenesis—a process observed in various species during growth and maturity. – Photo Credit: Amaia Alcalde Anton/Wellcome Photography Prize 2025

I Have You Under My Skin: Microplastics in Mammalian Tissues by P Stephen Patrick and Olumide Ogunlade

This groundbreaking non-invasive image reveals the presence of turquoise plastic particles deep within a living mouse. Biomedical researchers Patrick and Ogunlade have pioneered photoacoustic imaging techniques that utilize laser interactions with samples to visualize microplastics. – Photo Credit: P. Stephen Patrick and Olumide Ogunlade/Wellcome Photography Prize 2025

Liver Cholesterol by Steve Gschmeissner

This depiction by Steve Gschmeissner illustrates blue cholesterol crystals in a human liver, with lipid cell structures. The lipid droplet measures approximately 12 micrometers wide. – Photo Credit: Steve Gschmeissner/Wellcome Photography Prize 2025

read more:

Submarine Heat by Jander Matos and Joaquim Nascimento

Captured by researchers Jander Matos and Joaquim Nascimento at the Bioimaging Lab in Brazil, this image reveals the egg (0.56 mm wide) of the Aedes aegypti mosquito, a known carrier of diseases such as dengue and Zika. The yellow details in the egg indicate nodules that provide nutrients for survival in water. – Photo Credit: Jander Matos and Joaquim Nascimento/Wellcome Photography Prize 2025

Organoids by Oliver Mex and Nicole Ottawa

Photographed by Oliver Mex alongside biologist Nicole Ottawa, this organoid mimics the uterine lining and is colored for realistic representation. The organoid measures 0.2 mm in width. – Photo Credit: Oliver Mex and Nicole Ottawa/Welcome Photography Award 2025

Brixton Road, Lambeth in Southern London by Marina Vitaglione

Created by Marina Vitaglione in collaboration with Joseph Levermore and scientists from the Imperial College Environmental Research Group, this image visualizes contaminating particles (less than 0.01 mm) magnified from Brixton Road, London. It highlights these “invisible killers.” – Photo Credit: Marina Vitaglione/Wellcome Photography Prize 2025

Ice and Fire Record by Ingrid Augusto, Kildare Rocha de Miranda, and Vania Da Silva Vieira

This image illustrates the internal structure of *Trypanosoma cruzi*, the parasite responsible for Chagas disease, which is transmitted through contaminated food or bites from certain insects. Untreated, it can lead to serious cardiac and digestive conditions. – Photo Credit: Ingrid Augusto, Kildare Rocha de Miranda, Vania Da Silva Vieira/Wellcome Photography Prize 2025

Nemo’s Garden by Giacomo D’Orlando

Nemo’s Garden is the pioneering underwater greenhouse system located in Liguria, Italy, designed to explore agricultural solutions for regions facing challenges in plant cultivation. The findings showcase how submerged plants possess higher antioxidant levels than their land-grown counterparts, aiding in drug development. – Photo Credit: Giacomo D’Orlando/Wellcome Photography Prize 2025

read more:

Ciril Jazbec’s Dream of Curing Water

This series by Slovenian documentary photographer Ciril Jazbec investigates the health impacts of rapidly melting glaciers in the Cordillera Blanca Mountain Range, threatening water supplies with heavy metals accumulated over centuries. Peru houses most of the world’s tropical glaciers, vital for mountain farming communities. Climate change has led to a 40% reduction in glacier surface area since the 1970s. – Photo Credit: Ciril Jazbec / Wellcome Photography Prize 2025

Stereo EEG Self-Portrait by Muir Vidler

This self-portrait by UK photographer Muir Vidler captures his experience after electrode implantation into the brain for epilepsy treatment—a procedure used when medication fails. He documented this photo on the first day following electrode insertion, which he had to keep for a week. – Photo Credit: Muir Vidler / Wellcome Photography Prize 2025

Find a Life by Sandipani Chattopadhyay

This poignant image shows locals gathering water from the riverbed in Purulia, West Bengal, India. Climate change has disrupted the monsoon patterns, leading to dry rivers and forcing many communities to search for drinkable water. – Photo Credit: Sandipani Chattopadhyay / Wellcome Photography Prize 2025

This Is Endometriosis – 2014 – 2022: Five Years by Georgie Wilman

This self-portrait by UK photographer Georgie Wilman notes the dates of her scars resulting from endometriosis surgery. Affecting one in ten women and females assigned at birth, endometriosis is often downplayed as “painful periods,” a phrase that fails to encapsulate its severity, which causes internal bleeding and damage to organs. Wilman’s imagery powerfully conveys the struggles and impacts of living with endometriosis. – Photo Credit: Georgie Wileman / Wellcome Photography Prize 2025

read more:

Beautiful Disasters by Alexandru Popescu

This aerial view depicts a former village in the Loopa area, Transylvania, Romania. In 1977, Nicolae Ceaușescu forcibly relocated its 1,000 residents to create a toxic waste lake linked to Roșia Poieni copper mine. The lake grows approximately 100 cm annually, jeopardizing local groundwater quality. – Photo Credit: Alexandru Popescu / Wellcome Photography Prize 2025

read more:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Can Humans Thrive Beneath the Waves? Exploring a Live Underwater Experiment

In recent years, the desire to establish human colonies beyond Earth, whether to escape environmental issues or explore uncharted territories, has gained significant traction.

While much attention is given to proposed bases on the Moon and Mars, there’s a more challenging and lesser-known frontier much closer to home: the ocean’s depths.

This concept isn’t new. Since the 1960s, with pioneers like French oceanographer Jacques Cousteau, individuals have created and spent extended periods in aquatic habitats.

NASA has been sending teams to the Aquarius Reef Base since 2001. This research facility, located 20 meters (around 65 feet) underwater off the Florida coast, has allowed scientists, engineers, and future astronauts to live in the module for 7 to 14 days.

With advancements in technology, prolonged underwater stays may become feasible. The UK company, Deep, is leveraging this technology to design habitats for extended underwater living. But, is the technology the only challenge we face?

Above the Atmosphere, Under the Sea

Humans are quite vulnerable. We struggle without oxygen or sunlight and are not fond of extreme pressure changes. Thus, we might not be the best candidates for life at the ocean floor.

This doesn’t imply that we can’t thrive in inhospitable environments.

Since 2000, astronauts have spent significant periods aboard the International Space Station (ISS).

Several astronauts have been documented living in the ISS for over 300 consecutive days, but Valeri Polyakov holds the record, having spent 437 days aboard the Mir Space Station in Russia between 1994 and 1995.

Moreover, astronauts returning from lengthy missions often face health issues, such as reduced bone density and muscle atrophy. What does this mean for those who aim to live underwater?

The most extensive study is that of Rudiger Koch, a German aerospace engineer who lived in a capsule submerged 11 meters (36 feet) under the Caribbean Sea for 120 days between 2024 and 2025.

Rudiger Koch on the balcony of the capsule where he lived between 2024 and 2025.

Koch reported no health issues upon celebrating with champagne and cigars.

In second place is Professor Joseph Dituri, who spent 100 days studying the physical and psychological effects of living underwater in a lodge situated at the bottom of a 9-meter deep (30-foot) lagoon in Florida.

Dituri conducted daily tests during his time submerged and following his return to the surface. Notably, aside from minor setbacks, he felt quite well.

He noted improvements in sleep quality, cholesterol levels, and inflammation. His stem cell count, testosterone levels, and cognitive performance also improved.

Interestingly, Dituri appeared to have lowered his biological age (an indicator of the aging process of the body), although he was recorded as having shrunk by over 1 cm (approximately 0.5 inches) due to the pressurized environment inside the lodge.

read more:

A Step Towards Living Underwater

With limited data, we still have a tenuous understanding of life in aquatic environments. This is where Deep comes in.

The ocean technology and exploration company aims to develop two habitats by 2027, with the goal of establishing a permanent underwater presence. They are using a submerged quarry in Gloucestershire as a testing ground for their underwater habitats.

Deep is developing two habitat models: Vanguard, designed for three-person short stays, and Sentinel, a 16-meter (52-foot) capsule intended as a long-term habitat complete with living quarters, bedrooms, and research facilities, capable of accommodating researchers at depths of up to 200 meters (656 feet) for 28 days.

The aim is to enable researchers to remain submerged for extended periods, allowing for comprehensive studies of underwater living impacts and marine life. However, achieving these depths poses significant challenges.

“The most hazardous aspects of diving occur during descent,” explains Dr. Dawn Kernagis, Deep’s scientific research director. “Divers breathe compressed gas, with fluctuating pressure increasing the risk of decompression sickness (DCS), where gas bubbles form in the bloodstream.”

While most DCS cases are mild, severe instances can impact the brain, spinal cord, respiratory system, and circulatory systems.

To mitigate these risks, Deep aims to keep researchers “saturated” in the Sentinel habitats. This means achieving a new equilibrium with the underwater environment.

“Saturated tanks, like ours, facilitate diving into greater depths and adjusting to the pressure, enabling much longer stays, ranging from hours to about a month,” states Kernagis.

Deep plans for close monitoring of researchers during their stays to better understand the long-term physical and psychological effects of deep-sea living.

The foundation laid now may support future inhabitants underwater for weeks, months, or even years. In the not-so-distant future, some of us may find ourselves living in a modern-day Atlantis.

About Our Experts

Dr. Dawn Kernagis is the director of scientific research at Deep, a UK-based ocean technology and exploration firm. She has published in numerous scientific journals, including Journal of Clinical Oncology, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, and Circulation.

read more:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Can Your Brain Communicate with Others While You Sleep? This Experiment Says Yes.

Modern machine learning technology has demonstrated the ability to visualize our dreams. But what if you wish to take it a step further and share your dreams?

At present, we are capable of interpreting brain signals to obtain a vague understanding of imaginary scenes and overarching concepts, yet there is no method for transferring these ideas from one brain to another. Perhaps this is for the best. Many might feel uneasy at the thought of a computer implanting ideas into our minds while we sleep.

Our current means of communication rely on our sensory capabilities. Words that are whispered into your ears during sleep could serve as a method to convey information between two sleeping individuals. However, how can people communicate while asleep? The answer is more complicated than it seems.

Individuals who talk in their sleep (referred to as Somniloquists) often do so as a result of stress, and their peculiar utterances are not within their conscious control. Moreover, our capacity to hear while asleep is limited; sounds during sleep can disrupt it, causing both stress and dreams to the sleeper.

Yet, there is a particular dream that may be beneficial: the Akaid Dream. This unique type of dream allows the dreamer to recognize that they are still asleep. With some practice and various techniques, this can be guided.

In this state, could two dreamers actually communicate?

The company Rem Space claims not only that this is possible but also that they have achieved it.

They employed external stimuli to aid one sleeper in transitioning to a lucid dreaming state. The sleeper then conveyed a message through earphones, which was recorded by a computer as the lucid dreamer repeated the words in their sleep.

Eight minutes later, the message was played back to the second lucid dreamer, who confirmed hearing the words upon waking. While this may not serve a practical purpose in our current state, it did represent a form of communication within a dream.

There is, however, another type of shared thought that might prove more useful.

Researchers are currently demonstrating that individuals who work closely together begin to synchronize their brain waves. This phenomenon can occur in situations where musicians are tightly synchronized or in social groups where a strong connection is felt.

Inter-brain synchronization is observable through precise “hypersensitivity” with an electroencephalography (EEG) scanner that tracks brain waves. These can originate from theta waves (produced when we are deeply relaxed), alpha waves (when we are calm), or beta waves (when we are focused and active).

When these brain waves, particularly beta waves, synchronize among two or more individuals, they often collaborate more effectively, show enhanced empathy, and even display a reduced sensitivity to pain. Teams with synchronized neural activity typically perform better overall.

The best part is that no artificial intelligence or brain scanners are required!

To cultivate neural synchronization among those who wish to share experiences: engage in activities like listening to music together, dancing, collaborating, solving problems, or simply conversing. This sort of spiritual connection is available to us for free and brings substantial benefits.


This article responds to the question posed by Idris Wise via email: “Can you communicate in a dream?”

Feel free to email us your questions at Question @sciencefocus.com or send a message through Facebook, Twitter or Instagram (don’t forget to include your name and location).

Check out our ultimate Fun fact for more incredible science pages.


Read more:


Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Peer Review of the Egg Drop Experiment: A Critical Analysis

Feedback is your go-to source for the latest news in science and technology from New Scientist. If you have intriguing items to share, please reach out to Feedback@newscientist.com.

Egg vs. Grind

Feedback takes us back to the early days of the 2020 lockdown, when we found ourselves learning alongside our children. This involved engaging in various science-related activities, including setting up experiments for “mini beasts,” which provided a diversion from the complexities of life. Thankfully, we avoided the mishaps of the egg drop experiment.

This hands-on activity challenges kids to create devices that protect eggs from breaking when dropped from a height onto a hard surface. Feedback humorously envisions using a cocktail umbrella as a makeshift parachute to soften the landing. However, there are more serious approaches to this experiment.

A study published in Communication Physics on May 8th highlights the peer-reviewed work of physicist Carmela Padavik Callaghan, who addresses the classic egg drop experiment.

The researchers challenge the common belief that eggs are strongest when dropped vertically from their edge. Traditional wisdom has suggested that the shell’s rigidity in this position reduces breakage. However, after conducting “hundreds of experiments” alongside “static and dynamic simulations,” they found that dropping eggs vertically increases the likelihood of breakage. Instead, they recommend dropping them horizontally for better results.

They note: “By orienting the eggs along the equator, there is a slight benefit, as they can survive a fall from about 0.3 mm above the vertical drop without cracking.”

For readers contemplating an egg toss at a celebrity, this research offers practical guidance for ensuring a successful impact!

Alien Mathematics

What exactly are Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP), previously known as UFOs? According to research by Karim Daghbouche of the German nonprofit Gridsat Stiftung, reverse engineering these phenomena is incredibly complex.

If an unidentified flying object is under scrutiny, reverse engineering its operation could unveil its mechanics. However, Daghbouche highlights the significant challenges, as data collection difficulties and “unknown physics” complicate the process of understanding unconventional propulsion systems.

The mathematical hurdles are formidable, with “NP Complete” signifying a specific type of intricate problem. It may even escalate to Pspace-hard or an entscheidungsproblem, the latter being virtually unsolvable for those unfamiliar with advanced mathematics.

News editor Jacob Aron calls it “incredible,” and Feedback concurs. If potential explanations range from extraterrestrial technology to time travelers and dimensions, narrowing down a single answer becomes problematic.

This might illustrate the notion of “no kidding, Sherlock,” as scientific inquiries often culminate in seemingly obvious conclusions. Yet, if NP is complete, does that really signify a non-solution?

Alternatively, we could ponder a human-centric interpretation of UAPs, attributing them to “honest mistakes.” In that framework, NP would no longer be incomplete, and the situation could become far more manageable.

Feedback was surprised by the concluding remarks in the paper’s summary, which stated that “UAP is deemed UAP because it behaves like modern smartphones in the hands of Neanderthals.”

Feedback believes Neanderthals could likely figure out how to use an iPhone. Thus, more nuanced interpretations of UAPs could emerge.

I’ve Squared

In our mathematical mindset, Brendan Ash notes that we are in a “squared year”: 2025 is 45². The next one won’t come until 2116.

This got Brendan reminiscing about a curious incident from a few years ago during a lengthy road trip. He and his son had fun looking up famous individuals who were born one year and passed the next. Not many fit that description, but Russian neurologist Ivan Pavlov (famous for his dog and bell experiments) was “born in 43 squared” [1849] and died at 44 squared [1936].

A darker thought struck Brendan— “I was also intrigued that Pope Francis was born in 44 squared and quickly predicted his death in 2025.”

For those of us who make such throwaway jokes, there exists a peculiar psychological torment in having such ideas materialize. “My predictions are now fulfilled. I cannot fathom how sinful I should feel,” Brendan reflects.

Have you shared your feedback?

You can send your stories to feedback@newscientist.com. Don’t forget to include your home address. Previous feedback can also be found on our website.

Source: www.newscientist.com

Research claims that Facebook is continuing to experiment with users in a bizarre manner

Understanding the true nature of social media reveals that platforms like Facebook and Instagram are primarily profit-driven businesses that rely on advertising revenue. While we benefit from staying connected and entertained, we must also acknowledge the underlying business model.

Most users accept targeted ads as a trade-off for accessing online content. However, the issue arises when algorithms, rather than human decision-makers, dictate the ads we see. These automated systems are designed to prioritize clicks and sales, raising concerns about transparency and ethics.

A recent study highlighted the use of A/B tests by Facebook and Google to analyze user responses to different ad versions. Such experiments play a crucial role in marketing strategies, but the way they are conducted matters.

The problem lies in the lack of random assignment in these tests, as algorithms actively select users based on predicted engagement levels. This approach hinders advertisers from gaining genuine insights into effective ad strategies, relying instead on algorithmic optimization.

As of April 2025, Facebook has approximately 3.065 billion active users each month worldwide. Photo Credit: Getty

Advertisers may inadvertently target specific demographics, leading to unintended consequences like gender bias and political polarization. The complexity and accuracy of algorithms enable microtargeting at an individual level, shaping online experiences and influencing user behavior.

Implications for Users

Being online means being subject to constant experimentation by algorithms that determine content exposure. Users are unknowingly part of these experiments, where personalized messages influence thoughts, purchases, and beliefs.

It is crucial to recognize the impact of algorithmic decision-making on online experiences and be aware of the curated messages we receive. Transparency and accountability in digital platforms remain essential for fostering an informed online environment.

Expert Insights

Jan Cornil is an associate professor at the UBC Sauder School of Business in Canada, specializing in consumer behavior and marketing research. His work has been featured in top academic journals, emphasizing the importance of ethical marketing practices.

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Exploring the Production of Higgs Boson Pairs in Proton-Proton Collisions with the CMS Experiment

CMS Collaboration physicists used data from high-energy proton-proton collisions from Experiment 2 at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider (LHC) to released The latest research into the production of Higgs boson pairs, known as De-Higgs, has placed constraints on the rate of their formation.



Event display of candidate events for Higgs pair generation. Image credit: CERN.

According to physicists, Higgs particle pair can be created in two main ways.

The first is called gluon-gluon fusion, in which gluons (particles inside colliding protons) interact to produce the Higgs boson. This process allows scientists to study the interaction between one so-called intermediate state Higgs boson and two final state Higgs bosons.

The second method involves quarks, also inside the colliding protons, which emit two vector bosons. These vector particles interact to form a Higgs particle, allowing the study of the interaction between two Higgs particles and two vector particles.

CMS physicists performed the latest analysis by exploring multiple ways DeHiggs could collapse.

These final states resulted from the decay of Higgs boson pairs into bottom quarks, W particles, tau leptons, and photons.

By combining these searches and analyzing all the data simultaneously using advanced analytics techniques such as boosted decision trees and deep neural networks, the collaboration was able to extract more information than ever before. .

This study allowed the researchers to set an upper bound on the Higgs pair production rate with a 95% confidence level.

The measured limits are now 3.5 times higher than the Standard Model’s prediction for total DeHiggs production and 79 times higher than the Standard Model’s prediction for DeHiggs production by vector boson fusion.

The LHC’s Run 3 data acquisition era is underway, and the amount of data collected by CMS experiments has already doubled, and CMS researchers are making progress in analyzing it.

One of the most exciting prospects for measuring the self-interactions of the Higgs boson is the upcoming High-Luminosity LHC (HL-LHC), scheduled to become operational in 2030.

In this new phase, the accelerator will provide CMS with the highest luminosity ever reached in a collider.

Considering luminosity predictions and systematic uncertainties, scientists estimate that the first evidence of Higgs formation may begin to appear in about half of the HL-LHC data.

“We look forward to further investigating this rare and exciting phenomenon,” they said.

_____

CMS cooperation. 2024. Combined search for non-resonant Higgs boson pair production in proton-proton collisions at √s=13 TeV. CMS-PAS-HIG-20-011

Source: www.sci.news

Shocking discovery: Light can create its own shadow, reveals bizarre experiment

The shadow of the laser beam appears as a horizontal line against a blue background.

Abrahao et al. (2024)

Usually light casts shadows on other objects, but with the help of rubies, laser beams themselves can cast shadows.

When two laser beams interact, they don’t collide like the lightsabers in the movies. star warssay Rafael Abrahao At Brookhaven National Laboratory in New York. In real life, they simply pass through each other. But Abrahao and his colleagues discovered a way for one laser beam to block another, causing its shadow to appear.

The key ingredient was ruby ​​cubes. The researchers illuminated the cube with a green laser beam while shining a blue laser from the side. When green light passed through the ruby’s atoms, its properties changed in a unique way, which affected its response to blue light.

Atoms affected by the green light blocked the blue laser light instead of letting it pass, creating a shadow that was exactly the same shape as the green laser beam. Remarkably, the researchers were able to project blue light onto a screen and see this “laser shadow” with the naked eye.

Abrahao says he and his colleagues had a long discussion about whether what they had created was actually worthy of a shadow. Because moving the green laser beam also moved the green laser beam, we were able to see it without special equipment, and we were able to project it onto commonplace objects like markers, so we finally found a positive answer. I made a judgment.

Historically, understanding shadows has been critical to understanding what light can do and how it can be used, and this experiment has added to scientists’ light manipulation toolbox. Add unexpected technology, he says.

thomas kloba Researchers at the University of Erlangen-Nuremberg in Germany say their experiment used a known process to create an impressive visual demonstration of how materials can help control light. . For example, the interaction between lasers and rubies is similar to the interaction of materials used in laser eye surgery, and if the laser light becomes dangerously strong, it must be able to react by blocking the laser light. yeah.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

New Hera probe sent to study asteroid target of NASA’s previous experiment

On Monday, a spacecraft was launched to investigate. Space collision site.

The European Space Agency’s Hera spacecraft was rocket-launched on a two-year journey to the small, harmless asteroid it crashed into. Two years ago, NASA During that day’s dress rehearsal, a killer space stone threatens Earth. The experiment, launched by SpaceX from Cape Canaveral, is the second in a series of planetary defense tests that could one day save the planet.

Crash in 2022 NASA dart spacecraft This shortens Dimorphos’ orbit around its larger brethren, indicating that if a dangerous rock is headed in our direction, it can be thrown off course with sufficient advance notice. I did.

Scientists want to study the impact’s aftermath up close to learn exactly how effective Dart was and what changes are needed to protect the planet in the future.

“The more details we can gather, the more details we can gather because it could be important in planning future deflection missions if they are needed,” University of Maryland astronomer Derek Richardson said before the launch. It’s good enough.”

Researchers want to know whether Dart (short for Double Asteroid Redirection Test) left behind a crater or changed the shape of the 500-foot (150-meter) asteroid more dramatically. Richardson, who participates in the dart mission and supports Hera, said that before the dart was shot, it looked like a flying saucer, but now it may resemble a kidney bean.

ESA’s Hera mission lifted off at 10:52 a.m. Monday aboard a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket from Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida.
S. Korbach / ESA

The flurry of darts sent debris and even rocks flying from Dimorphos, further increasing the force of the impact. The debris trail stretched thousands of miles (more than 10,000 kilometers) into space over several months.

Flight director Ignacio Tanco said rocks and other debris may still be floating around the asteroid, posing a potential threat to Hera.

“We don’t really know what kind of environment we’re going to operate in,” Tanko says. “But the whole point of this mission is to go out there and find out.”

European officials described the $400 million (363 million euro) mission as an “investigation of the accident scene.”

Project manager Ian Carnelli said Hera was “returning to the crime scene and obtaining all the scientific and technical information”.

Hera, which is about the size of a small car and carries more than a dozen scientific instruments, needs to fly past Mars in 2025 to increase its gravity and reach Dimorphos by the end of 2026. This is a satellite of the fast-spinning asteroid Didymos, which means twins in Greek. It’s 5 times bigger. At that point, the asteroid will be 120 million miles (195 million kilometers) from Earth.

Hera, controlled by a flight team in Darmstadt, Germany, will attempt to enter orbit around the pair of rocks as its flight range gradually decreases from 18 miles (30 kilometers) to half a mile (1 kilometer). The spacecraft will study the satellite for at least six months, determining its mass, shape, composition, and orbit around Didymos.

Before impact, Dimorphos circled its larger mate from three-quarters of a mile (1,189 meters) away. Scientists believe the orbit could become tighter and more elliptical, potentially even causing the satellite to fall off.

Source: www.nbcnews.com

Explore the inner workings of the world’s largest nuclear fusion experiment

Tokamak’s 30-metre deep assembly pit

©Enrico Sacchetti

Huge in scale and ambition, ITER is a €20 billion energy project being built in the south of France that will pave the way for nuclear fusion power similar to the sun’s energy source.

The world’s largest nuclear fusion experiment was launched in 2006 by an international effort involving the European Union, the United States, China, and Russia. The reactor’s first operation, which will create an extremely hot substance called plasma (the conditions needed for nuclear fusion), is scheduled for 2020. The plan was initially postponed to 2025, and new delays have now pushed it to 2035.

on the other hand, Enrico Sacchetti It offers a glimpse into ITER’s construction and potential.

One of the toroidal coils

©Enrico Sacchetti

The main image shows the 30-metre deep dimensions of the tokamak’s assembly pit, a device that uses magnetic fields to confine swirling plasma inside a doughnut-shaped torus: Above is a shot of one of the toroidal coils that generate these magnetic fields.

The image below shows some of the nine sectors that make up the ITER vacuum vessel, which weighs 5,200 tonnes and acts as an extremely durable “cage” for the experiments, keeping the continuously swirling plasma from touching its walls.

Vacuum vessel being transported for repairs

©Enrico Sacchetti

The top image shows part of the vacuum vessel being transported for repair, while the bottom photo shows the supports that line the back of the blanket module’s wall, which protects the structure and magnets from the heat and high-energy neutrons of the reaction.

www.newscientist.com

Get Ready for the Ultimate Solar Eclipse Science Experiment!

In April, a total solar eclipse is expected to occur, promising great scientific success thanks to new spacecraft, telescopes, and cosmic coincidences.

The upcoming eclipse will feature the Moon very close to Earth, resulting in a prolonged period of darkness, and an anticipated increase in solar activity with possible dramatic plasma bursts. Additionally, densely populated areas from Mexico to America to Canada will witness this phenomenon.

During the eclipse, citizen scientists among the tens of millions of spectators will assist NASA and other research groups in studying our planet and stars. They will capture images of the sun’s corona as the moon blocks sunlight for up to 4 minutes and 28 seconds on April 8. The atmosphere will witness calm among birds and animals as darkness envelops midday. Other activities include measuring temperature drops, monitoring clouds, and using amateur radio to assess interruptions in communications.

Simultaneously, a rocket carrying scientific instruments will be launched into the ionosphere near the edge of the universe. This launch, from Wallops Island, Virginia, aims to study the electrically charged region of the atmosphere during the partial solar eclipse, obscuring 81% of the sun. NASA’s high-altitude jets will also be deployed with improved telescopes to observe the eclipse’s effects on the sun’s corona and surrounding dust.

Various scientific activities will take place along the eclipse path across different locations. More than 600 weather balloons will be launched for live-streamed atmospheric studies by university students, irrespective of cloudy skies. The eclipse will provide a rare opportunity to observe the sun’s corona, which is usually hidden by its glare, and offer valuable insights into the corona’s extreme temperatures.

The eclipse will traverse through several U.S. states, into Canada, and finally exit into the Atlantic Ocean. Scientists are looking forward to the event to gather valuable data and insights, especially with the heightened solar activity compared to the 2017 eclipse. With new spacecraft studying the sun and advanced scientific instruments in place, April’s solar eclipse promises a wealth of scientific discoveries.

This eclipse, passing through U.S. radar sites monitoring space weather, will offer a unique opportunity for scientific observation closer to home.

Source: www.nbcnews.com

Lab experiment suggests CRISPR can disable and treat HIV

Electron micrograph of HIV, which currently requires lifelong medication

Scott Kamazin/Alamy Stock Photo

A new way to eradicate HIV from the body could one day become a cure for infection with the virus, but it has not yet been proven effective in humans.

The strategy uses a relatively new genetic technology called CRISPR, which can make cuts in DNA and introduce errors into the viral genetic material within immune cells. “These findings represent a vital advance toward the design of therapeutic strategies,” the researchers said. Elena Herrera Carrillo Researchers from the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands said in a statement.

HIV infection used to be almost always fatal, but now people with the virus can take drugs that stop the virus from replicating. Therefore, as long as you diligently take your medication every day, you can maintain a nearly normal lifespan.

But when a person is first infected, some of the virus inserts its DNA into immune cells, where it becomes dormant. When you stop taking your HIV medication, this DNA “reawakens” and the virus begins to spread again through your immune system.

For treatment, we need some way to kill the latent virus in the body. Several strategies have been tried, but so far none have been found to work.

The latest approach uses a gene editing system called CRISPR. Originally discovered in bacteria, it targets specific DNA sequences and makes cuts there. By changing the targeted DNA sequence, the system could be applied as a form of gene therapy for many conditions, and such treatments were launched in the US and UK last year as a treatment for sickle cell anemia. first approved.

Several groups are working with CRISPR to target HIV genes as a way to disable the dormant virus. Now, Carrillo and her team have shown that when tested on immune cells in a dish, the CRISPR system can neutralize all viruses and remove them from these cells. The work will be presented at European Conference on Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Next month in Barcelona, Spain.

Jonathan Stoy Researchers at London’s Francis Crick Institute say the results are encouraging, but the next step is testing in animals and eventually humans to ensure the treatment is available to all people with dormant HIV. The aim is to show that it can reach immune cells, he said. Some of these cells are thought to reside in the bone marrow, but other parts of the body may also be involved, he says. “There is still considerable uncertainty about whether there are other stores in other parts of the body,” he says.

A California company called Excision BioTherapeutics has previously shown that a CRISPR-based approach can: Reduce the amount of latent virus in monkeys infected with a virus similar to HIV.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

The Failure of My Experiment with No Phone: A Life-Changing Experience with Mobile Phones

The final update on Rick’s journey to overcome cell phone addiction allows him to make a breakthrough. And a big one.

“Do you want to be my girlfriend?” I ask Almond one day.

She’s flipping through a plastic-like bag of Thai basil from a record store. “I already am. That’s what it is,” she said patiently, taking my hand. Oh yes, I say. got it. nice.

Two months after my last diary entry, something strange happened. I dismissed this experiment as a waste of time, but it seems to be yielding skewed results. Currently, I use my smartphone for 90 minutes a day. Five of those are spent on Instagram. I no longer feel addictive. Part of the reason my online life has decreased is because I no longer have to scour the savanna to find a mate. However, that alone does not determine everything.

Newsletter registration

All the experts I spoke to gave reassuringly similar advice. Oddly enough, some of my most impactful conversations about technology were with Buddhists in cafes without Wi-Fi. Sthiramanas is a meditation teacher at the London Buddhist Center and runs his Upgrade Your Mind, his six-week course on mindful screen use.

“Looking outward for satisfaction is a fundamental human weakness,” he says. Sthiramanas doesn’t just mean infinite scrolling. Heading to a quiet retreat or digital detox his cabin in the woods is also an escape from everyday life. What they learn often doesn’t stick with them by the time they get home. “If you want your life to be happier and more creative, you have to experience life as it is and change things from there.

“What is desire? Under Want to check your phone? ” he continued. “If you’re addicted to dating apps, is it because you want to feel attractive? If you’re a news addict, are you addicted to feeling in control? Or is it because you want to feel like you’re in control? Are you in touch? Are you texting your friends all the time just because you want to be loved?”

ah. When did these Buddhists choose violence?

Ever since that chat, I think of friendship as mostly an offline activity. What we do with our bodies. My friends are great at arranging day trips to the seaside, dancing, and cooking for each other. Laughing in the same space is nourishing. Sounds Waltons-esque, but better than meta. I still find him texting his friends frequently throughout the day, but when he doesn’t, it’s fun not being able to see them. Maybe I’ve gone crazy.

Is it possible to enjoy the reality of “boring” life without fantasies of escape? Photo: Alicia Kanter/The Guardian

Always-on connectivity is a new expectation, and meeting it can be challenging. My biggest fear about turning off my cell phone was missing a call from my girlfriend’s mother if she fell. But I realized that at the root of my resistance was a fear of control. And someday we all have to give it up. “You can also set up a landline for emergencies and give that number only to your loved ones,” suggests Stiramanath. That’s a good idea.

Another slow burn is the increase in time spent reading. I think that’s why I no longer spend the entire day on Instagram. Now, when I open any social media app, I feel like… stupid. Perhaps concentration is actually a muscle, and when you build muscle, you try to lift heavier. Of course, there are many people who enjoy both. This is not to say that all social media content is shallow and meaningless. (I think so too!)

Skip past newsletter promotions

Is it possible to enjoy the reality of “boring” life without fantasies of escape? This was a very important question for me.

I’ll clean up my apartment more. look It’s more than that. I continued to walk 10,000 steps. I still like filling out fitness tracking circles, but I’m not as obsessive about it. I can feel the effects on my body. Sometimes you forget your cell phone at home. It’s a mental reset to feel the atmosphere like you’re not anywhere else. And I’m much happier than before.

If you’re a fan of capitalism, I should point out that my freelance income has increased and my productivity has increased. I don’t think it’s helpful to malign tech companies too much, and I’ve stopped anthropomorphizing my phone. A shiny, infinitely content machine is neither your muse nor your cold lover nor your nemesis. It’s a tool. More than anything it’s my barometer of dissatisfaction.

When I realize that I have that weight in my hands, and the force that distracts me and tries to escape, I try to diagnose what is really going on inside me. Are you worried about something? am i lonely? What better way to meet my needs? I’m learning to believe that even if I’m just bored, there’s creativity hidden there.

Who could have predicted this? My smartphone, like a canary in the coal mine, represents what’s most important to me: days without sleepwalking. The thief of my life? No one can steal my life.

Unfortunately, I am now addicted to sugar.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Rethinking Quantum Consciousness: An Intriguing Experiment

Two weeks before the pandemic lockdown in March 2020, I flew to Tucson, Arizona, and knocked on the door of a suburban ranch-style home. I was there to visit Stuart Hameroff. He is an anesthesiologist and co-inventor with Nobel Prize-winning physicist Roger Penrose of a radical proposal for how conscious experience arises: that the origins of conscious experience lie in quantum phenomena in the brain.

Such ideas, in one form or another, have existed on the fringes of mainstream consciousness research for decades. There is no solid experimental evidence that quantum effects occur in the brain, as critics claim, and aside from a clear idea of how quantum effects produce consciousness, they come in from the cold. Not that it was. “It was very popular to bash us,” Hameroff told me.

But after a week of questioning him about the concept, I realized that at least his version of quantum consciousness is widely misunderstood. Partly, I think it’s Hameroff’s fault. He gives the impression of a single package. In fact, his ideas are a series of independent proposals, each forcing us to confront important questions about the relationship between fundamental physics, biology, and the indescribable thing called consciousness.

Furthermore, during my visit I saw several experiments that Hameroff had proposed come to fruition, and it became clear that his ideas could be applied to experimental research. Researchers have now provided preliminary evidence suggesting that fragile quantum states can persist in the brain and that anesthetics can influence those states.

Now is the time to start taking it…

Source: www.newscientist.com

New experiment challenges the principles of quantum electrodynamics

The X-ray beam from Europe’s XFEL, the world’s largest X-ray laser, can only be seen with photographic clarity in complete darkness and with an exposure time of 90 seconds. In 2024, the first experiment to detect quantum fluctuations in vacuum will take place here. Credit: European XFEL / Jan Hosan

The HZDR team proposes improvements to experiments aimed at probing the limits of physics.

Completely empty – that’s how most of us imagine a vacuum. But in reality, it is filled with flickers of energy, or quantum fluctuations. Scientists are now preparing laser experiments aimed at examining these vacuum fluctuations in new ways, which could provide clues to new laws of physics.

The Dresden-Rossendorf-Helmholtzzentrum (HZDR) research team has developed a series of suggestions designed to make experiments more effective and increase the chances of success.The research team will publish their findings in a scientific journal Physical Review D.

The world of physics has long recognized that the vacuum is not completely hollow, but filled with vacuum fluctuations, eerie quanta that flicker around in time and space. Although it cannot be captured directly, its effects can be observed indirectly, for example through changes in the electromagnetic field of small particles.

However, it is still not possible to verify vacuum fluctuations without the presence of particles. If this can be achieved, one of the fundamental theories of physics, quantum electrodynamics (QED), will be proven in a previously untested area. However, if such experiments reveal deviations from theory, it would suggest the existence of new, previously undiscovered particles.

Dr. Ulf Zastrau heads the HED (High Energy Density Science) experimental station at European XFEL. HED Beam In his chamber, flashes from his X-ray laser, the world’s largest, must be matched with light pulses from his ReLaX high-power laser operated by HZDR to detect vacuum fluctuations. Credit: European XFEL / Jan Hosan

Experiments to achieve this are planned as part of the Helmholtz International Extreme Field Beamline (HIBEF), a research consortium led by HZDR, at the HED experimental station of the world’s largest X-ray laser, the European XFEL, in Hamburg. There is. . The basic principle is that an ultra-powerful laser fires short, powerful flashes into a vacuumed stainless steel chamber. The aim is to manipulate vacuum fluctuations to, as if by magic, change the polarization of his X-ray flashes from his XFEL in Europe, i.e. rotate their direction of vibration.

“It’s like sliding a clear plastic ruler between two polarizing filters and bending it back and forth,” explains HZDR theorist Professor Ralf Schutzhold. “A filter is originally set up to prevent light from passing through it. Bending the ruler changes the direction of the vibrations of light, allowing you to see something.” In this analogy, the ruler responds to fluctuations in the vacuum. and a super powerful laser flash bends the vacuum fluctuations.

Two flashes instead of just one

The original concept involved firing a single optical laser flash into a chamber and using special measurement techniques to record whether the polarization of the X-ray flash changed. But there’s a problem. “The signal can be very weak,” Schutzhold explains. “Only one in a trillion X-ray photons can change its polarization.”

However, this may be below current measurement limits, and events may simply slip through the cracks undetected. Schutzhold and his team therefore rely on a variation of firing not just one but two of his light laser pulses into a vacuum chamber simultaneously.

Both flashes run into it and literally collide. Her X-ray pulses from Europe’s XFEL are set to hit precisely the point of impact. The clincher: Laser flash collisions affect her X-ray pulses like a kind of crystal. Just as X-rays are diffracted, or deflected, when they pass through natural crystals, XFEL X-ray pulses are deflected by the brief “crystal of light” of the two colliding laser flashes.

“This not only changes the polarization of the X-ray pulse, but also slightly deflects the pulse,” explains Ralf Schutzholt. The researchers hope that this combination may improve the chances of actually measuring effects. The researchers calculated different options for the firing angle of the two laser flashes colliding inside the chamber. Experimentation will tell you which variant works best.

Are you targeting ultralight ghost particles?

The visibility could also be further improved if the two laser flashes fired into the chamber were not the same color, but two different wavelengths. This also allows for small changes in the energy of the X-ray flash, which is useful for measuring effectiveness as well. “However, this is technically very difficult and may be implemented at a later date,” Schutzhold says.

The project is currently in the planning stage in collaboration with the European XFEL team at the HED experimental station in Hamburg, with first trials scheduled to begin in 2024. If successful, QED could be confirmed again.

However, perhaps experiments will reveal deviations from established theory. This could be caused by previously undiscovered particles, such as ultralight ghost particles known as axions. “And it will clearly demonstrate additional laws of nature that were previously unknown,” Schutzholt says.

Reference: “Quantum vacuum diffraction and birefringence detection scheme” N. Ahmadiniaz, TE Cowan, J. Grenzer, S. Franchino-Viñas, A. Laso Garcia, M. Šmíd, T. Toncian, MA Trejo, R. Schützhold , October 10, 2023 Physical Review D.
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.076005

Source: scitechdaily.com

NASA conducts swarm experiment with Starling CubeSats

NASA’s Starling mission will test new technologies for autonomous swarm navigation on four CubeSats in low Earth orbit.Credit: NASA Ames Research Center

NASAThe four Starling spacecraft, Blinky, Pinky, Inky, and Clyde, have successfully completed commissioning and are now in group experiment configuration. The spacecraft successfully completed several mission activities aimed at advancing satellite constellation technology.

Payload commissioning was delayed due to several anomalies that the team had to investigate.
GPS Satellite data is included more than expected at the spacecraft-to-payload interface. Software updates have resolved most of these issues and the CubeSat has begun its planned work.

Starling’s mission will include network communications between spacecraft, maintaining relative navigation and understanding each satellite’s position, autonomous swarm reconfiguration and reconfiguration to ensure the swarm can adapt as it moves as a group. It includes four main features of decentralized scientific autonomy: maintenance, and proving the ability to coordinate experiments. own activities.

NASA’s six-month Starling mission will use a team of four CubeSats in low-Earth orbit to test technologies that allow spacecraft to operate synchronously without using resources from the ground. This technology will advance capabilities in swarm maneuver planning and execution, communications networking, relative navigation, and autonomous coordination between spacecraft. Credit: NASA/Conceptual Image Lab/Ross Walter

NASA’s Starling Mission

NASA’s Starling mission represents a significant advance in the field of satellite technology. The mission features a group of small satellites named Blinky, Pinky, Inky, and Clyde, known as CubeSats. These CubeSats are designed to operate in swarms and demonstrate advanced concepts in autonomous satellite interaction.

The main objectives of the Starling mission are:

  1. Network communication: CubeSats have the ability to communicate with each other, forming complex networks in space. This allows for coordinated activities and data sharing between satellites.
  2. Relative navigation: A key feature of this mission is that each CubeSat can accurately understand its position relative to other CubeSats. This ensures precise maneuvering and positioning within the swarm.
  3. Autonomous Swarm reconfiguration: Satellites can autonomously reconfigure their positions within the swarm. This capability is critical to adapting to varying mission requirements and maintaining optimal formation during operations.
  4. Autonomy of decentralized science: CubeSats can independently coordinate experimental activities. This feature indicates the potential for future space missions to adapt and respond to environmental changes and mission objectives without requiring direct intervention from Earth.

Through these innovative CubeSats, the Starling mission aims to improve the understanding and capabilities of satellite constellation technology and potentially revolutionize the way we approach space exploration and satellite operations.

Source: scitechdaily.com