How Jupiter’s Powerful Magnetic Field Contributes to Its Numerous Large Moons

Jupiter’s system boasts four large moons, including Ganymede, the largest moon in the solar system, while Saturn’s system is primarily influenced by Titan, its giant moon. Recent simulations indicate that Jupiter’s powerful magnetic field created gaps in its primordial disk, facilitating the capture and retention of significant moons like Io and Ganymede. In contrast, Saturn’s weaker magnetic field has resulted in a more sparsely populated satellite system.



Jupiter’s strong magnetic field creates a cavity in its surrounding disk, whereas Saturn’s weak field leads to a different disk evolution. Image credits: Yuri Fujii / L-INSIGHT / Kyoto University / Shinichiro Kinoshita

“The largest planets in our solar system, Jupiter and Saturn, also have the most extensive satellite systems,” stated Dr. Yuri Fujii, a researcher with Kyoto University and Nagoya University, alongside colleagues.

“Currently, Jupiter is known to have over 100 moons, while Saturn’s total, including its rings, exceeds 280 moons.”

“However, not all these moons are alike. Jupiter’s moon family includes four large bodies, while Saturn’s is heavily influenced by its single large moon, Titan.”

“The disparity between these satellite systems has intrigued astronomers for years, especially since both planets are gas giants.”

“Theories surrounding satellite formation provide various explanations, yet recent studies of stellar magnetic fields suggest a reevaluation of these notions is necessary.”

“A longstanding debate exists regarding magnetic accretion and satellite formation, particularly whether internal cavities in Jupiter’s disk could lead to the accumulation of materials that foster moon formation.”

A comprehensive model that elucidates the differing structures of satellite systems like those of Jupiter and Saturn could be applicable to exoplanetary systems beyond our own.

“Validating planet formation theories is challenging since we rely solely on our solar system. However, numerous satellite systems in proximity offer detailed observational opportunities,” Dr. Fujii noted.

To investigate the thermal evolution of Jupiter and Saturn and track changes in their magnetic fields, researchers simulated the internal structures of the young gas giants.

Additionally, they modeled the circumplanetary disks surrounding both planets and conducted N-body simulations to observe satellite formation and migration.

Results indicated that the structural differences in the satellite systems of Jupiter and Saturn are attributed to their disk compositions, influenced by the strength of their magnetic fields.

Specifically, Jupiter’s robust magnetic field is believed to have formed a magnetospheric cavity, trapping moons such as Io, Europa, and Ganymede.

Conversely, Saturn’s young magnetic field lacked the strength to create a cavity, making it difficult for moons to survive within its disk.

“Our findings suggest that upcoming surveys may discover compact exomoon systems around gas giants, along with several distant moons around Saturn-like gas giants,” the research team concluded.

For more details, refer to the study published on April 2nd in Nature Astronomy.

_____

Yu Fujii et al. Different architectures from magnetospheric cavity formation of Jupiter and Saturn’s satellite systems. Nat Astron published online on April 2, 2026, doi: 10.1038/s41550-026-02820-x

Source: www.sci.news

Tech Industry Begins to Support President-Elect as Amazon Contributes $1 million to Inaugural Fund

Amazon is the latest tech giant to donate to Donald Trump’s inaugural fund.

Reports indicate that the company plans to donate $1 million to the fund, as first reported by the Wall Street Journal. Following in Meta’s footsteps, Facebook’s parent company, which also donated $1 million to President Trump’s inaugural committee, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman announced that he would make a personal donation of $1 million. This was reported by Fox News.

As President Trump prepares for his second term, several major tech companies are showing support in hopes of gaining favor for their businesses. Amazon founder Jeff Bezos is scheduled to meet with President Trump next week, and Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg recently dined with him at his Mar-a-Lago mansion. Google CEO Sundar Pichai is also expected to meet the president soon, according to reports. Time magazine, owned by Salesforce CEO Marc Benioff, even named Trump its “Person of the Year.”

Altman of OpenAI expressed his belief that Trump will lead the country in technological advancement. In a statement to the Guardian, Altman said, “President Trump will lead our country into the age of AI, and I look forward to supporting his efforts to ensure the United States stays ahead.”

Donating to inaugural committees is a common practice for large companies seeking to establish rapport with the incoming administration. Amazon, for example, donated $57,746 to President Trump’s first inaugural fund in 2017, according to Open Secrets. Google and Microsoft also made donations, while Mehta confirmed to the Guardian that he did not donate that year.

Amazon stated that during Joe Biden’s 2021 inauguration, the administration declined donations from technology companies, as reported by the Wall Street Journal.

Allegedly, Trump plans to offer additional perks to donors who contribute at least $1 million to his inaugural committee, including access to various events around the inauguration, dinners with Trump, Cabinet nominations, and a dinner with J.D. Vance, according to the New York Times.

Bezos, who owns the Washington Post, has been a target of Trump’s criticism. However, before the election, the Washington Post decided not to endorse a presidential candidate, likely in an attempt to avoid provoking Trump, as reported by The Washington Post.

Skip past newsletter promotions

After Trump’s victory, Bezos and Amazon CEO Andy Jassy expressed their support for the new administration. Bezos praised Trump for the opportunities ahead, while Jassy celebrated the victory and expressed eagerness to collaborate with the administration. Amazon’s stock price reportedly rose by 14% after the election.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Research Shows That the Medium Size of a Cheetah Contributes to its Unmatched Speed

The fastest animals are neither large elephants nor small ants, but intermediate sizes such as: Cheetah(Acinonychus jubatus). Why does running speed deviate from the regular patterns that govern an animal's anatomy and most other aspects of performance? A new study shows that, as previously thought, maximum running speed This suggests that there is not one limit to speed, but two: the speed and distance at which the muscle contracts. The maximum speed an animal can reach is determined by which limit is reached first, and that limit is determined by the size of the animal.

Cheetah (Acinonychus jubatus).

University of the Sunshine Coast researcher Professor Christopher Clemente said: “The key to our model is understanding that maximum running speed is limited by how fast the muscles contract and how much they can shorten during contraction. ” he said. University of Queensland.

“Animals as big as cheetahs exist in a physical sweet spot of about 50 kg where these two limits meet. Therefore, these animals are the fastest, with speeds of up to 105 km/h (65 mph). will reach.”

The first limit is called the “kinetic energy capacity limit'' and suggests that muscles in small animals are limited by how fast they can contract.

Because small animals generate large forces relative to their body weight, running for them is similar to trying to accelerate in a low gear when riding a bicycle downhill.

The second limitation is called the “work capacity limitation” and suggests that muscles in large animals are limited by the range over which they can contract.

Large animals are heavy, so their muscles produce less force relative to their body weight, and running is similar to trying to accelerate up a hill in a high gear on a bicycle.

“For large animals like rhinos and elephants, running can feel like lifting huge weights because their muscles are relatively weak and gravity takes a big toll on them,” says Harvard University. says researcher Dr. Peter Bishop.

“As a result of both, animals eventually have to slow down as they grow.”

To test the model's accuracy, the authors compared its predictions to land animal speed and size data from more than 400 species, ranging from large mammals, birds, and lizards to small spiders and insects.

The model accurately predicted how maximum running speed varied with body size for animals whose weights varied by more than 10 orders of magnitude, from a tiny 0.1 milligram tick to a 6-ton elephant.

Their findings shed light on the physical principles behind how muscles evolved and could inform future designs of robots that can match the athletic performance of the best animal runners.

The new model may not only explain how fast animals can run, but also provide important clues for understanding differences between groups of animals.

Large reptiles, such as lizards and crocodiles, are generally smaller and slower than large mammals.

“One possible explanation for this may be that reptiles' limb muscles make up a small proportion of their body mass, meaning that reptiles reach their work limits quickly when they are light. It needs to stay small in order to move,” he said. Taylor Dick is a researcher at the University of Queensland.

The researchers' model, combined with data from living species, also predicted that land animals weighing more than 40 tonnes would be unable to move.

The heaviest land mammal living today is the African elephant, which weighs approximately 6.6 tons, but there are also land dinosaurs such as: Patagotitanit probably weighed well over 40 tons.

“This indicates that caution is needed in extrapolating the muscle anatomy of extinct animals from data from non-extinct animals,” the researchers said.

“Rather, the data indicate that extinct giants may have evolved unique muscle anatomy, which warrants further study.”

Dr David Labonte, a researcher at Imperial College London, said: “Our study raises many interesting questions about muscle physiology in both extinct animals and living animals, including human athletes.” said.

“Physical constraints affect animals that swim and fly just as they do animals that run, and lifting these constraints is our next challenge.”

a paper The survey results were published in a magazine nature communications.

_____

D. Labonte other. 2024. Dynamic similarity and unique allometry of maximum running speed. Nat Commune 15, 2181; doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-46269-w

Source: www.sci.news