Tag Archives: Tech

15 Top Tech Gifts for Moms in the U.S. | Gift Ideas by Filter US

Posted on by
Reply

TThe greatest gift for your mom this holiday season is an opportunity to unwind. A day free from obligations, where someone else handles cooking, cleaning, and chores. She can take a break, enjoy brunch with friends, or indulge in shopping. However, don’t forget to have something beautifully wrapped and waiting for her under the tree.


Having been a technology critic for over ten years and a mother myself, I particularly enjoy unwrapping gadgets. That said, you don’t need to be a tech enthusiast to value the practicality and luxury of well-thought-out devices. I consulted numerous moms across various price ranges to gather insights on their tech wish lists this holiday season.

All prices are accurate as of the publication date.

Tech gifts for mom under $50



 Photo: Provided by Amazon

Apple AirTag

$17.97 on Amazon

$17.97 at Walmart

Parents can often feel overwhelmed, anxious, and forgetful. I absolutely love Apple AirTags. You can attach it to your car keys or keep it in your wallet for peace of mind. When my car keys get lost within the cushions of the couch or my wallet is left in another bag, the iPhone’s precision search acts like a homing device to locate my keys. When outside Bluetooth range, AirTags can relay location information via nearby iPhone users, helping you find misplaced items like luggage. I’ve relied on AirTag more times than I’d care to admit, including attaching it to my 13-year-old’s house keys to help him find it after losing it repeatedly.



 Photo: Provided by Scosh

Scosche MagStack USB-C Cable

$29.99 at Crutchfield

I’ve come to realize that I can never have enough cables. Nowadays, every device operates on USB-C, and while many come with additional cables included, it’s inevitable that someone in my family will borrow mine, leaving me without it.

I admire these cables for their durability and the convenience of being able to neatly coil them for travel, thanks to their magnetic jacket. They also enable speedy data transfers and quick charging when connected to compatible devices and power adapters. A chic cable with various stylish colors and a sleek design; I doubt any mother would say, “No, thank you.”



Photo: Provided by Amazon

Coffee Warming Tray

$32.99 on Amazon

All moms, particularly those like me who work from home, understand the frustration of pouring a fresh cup of coffee, setting it aside, and diving into work—only to discover an hour later that it has gone cold.

This mug warmer changes that. Just place the mug on the heating plate, and your coffee, tea, or any other hot beverage stays hot for hours. No more waste, and mom will be thrilled. You can savor your morning in peace. “I’m specific about coffee mugs,” Marta shared. That’s why she prefers a mug warmer like this over heated mugs that require charging and hand washing.



 Photo: Provided by Amazon

Breathing Pal Kyle Mindfulness Breathing Light

$21.89 on Amazon

This charming light serves dual purposes: it can be a night light or a calming meditation aid to alleviate anxiety. It offers three breathing exercises, including simple box breathing, to help moms collect themselves after a stressful day. The light cues guide mom, and you can even change the colors to match her mood.

Plus, its adorable design (which comes in koala, rabbit, and ball shapes) is sure to bring a smile. Carla, 46, noted: “I had read about the benefits of guided breathing, but I wasn’t particularly enthusiastic. Seeing this cute koala could motivate me to stick with it.”



 Photo: Provided by Amazon

Yukosphone Tripod

$29.99 on Amazon

Moms always find themselves behind the camera, but seldom in front of it. Capture her essence by using a tripod for her phone. This model features extendable legs that collapse to the size of a handheld selfie stick, inclusive of a remote control that allows you to snap a picture when everyone is beaming.

Active moms will appreciate being able to set up their phones and tripods to document the action, ensuring they don’t miss a memorable goal or home run. Blair, 40, expressed: “I want a small tripod to have beside me while playing. I dislike holding my phone, and can’t clap or cheer while playing, so I miss recording it.”

Technology gifts Mom under $100



 Photo: Provided by Amazon

Kensington MagPro Elite Magnetic Privacy Screen

$64.99 on Amazon


$75.99 at Kensington


As someone who frequently works from home but also at local coffee shops and travels for work, I find this privacy screen invaluable. It stops nosy onlookers from peeking at my screen.

Designed specifically for MacBooks (but available for other computers as well), it adheres magnetically to the screen without adhesives. When viewed directly, it doesn’t obstruct your sight, but when you shift your angle, nothing can be seen. It also cuts down on blue light, thereby reducing eye strain, making it excellent for long hours in front of screens.



 Photo: Provided by Hyper

Hyper Hyper Pack Backpack

$67.49 at Hyper

I’ve been utilizing this backpack over the last few months for remote work and travels. At first glance, it doesn’t seem big enough to hold everything I need, yet it surprisingly accommodates more than expected. During a recent lengthy flight to Spain, I managed to fit all of my essentials: laptop, headphones, compact camera case, smartphone, battery pack, sunglasses, toiletries, house keys, wipes, cables, and chargers.

Having been caught in the rain multiple times, the water-resistant fabric and zippers ensure that everything inside remains dry. Plus, it’s made from recycled plastic bottles!



 Photo: Provided by Amazon

Monster AC601 Earphones

$89.99 on Amazon

My best friend absolutely adores these earbuds. She “borrowed” them a few years back and still uses them daily, especially during workouts and walks. Not only are they very affordable, but they also feature Bluetooth 6.0 for a reliable connection to your device, complete with real-time translation capabilities. The included charging case provides a whopping 32 hours of battery life, reducing the hassle of daily charging. “I love the purple Monster earphones,” Marta, 46, said, “I have oddly shaped ears, and these don’t irritate me like typical earphones do. They fit perfectly and I don’t have to adjust them constantly.”

Skip past newsletter promotions


Photo: Provided by Amazon

Anker MagGo Power Bank

$79.99 on Amazon

$99.99 at Anchor

I won’t leave the house without these chargers. Their slim profile fits nicely into any bag and provides extra power when needed, whether it’s to get an Uber or catch an exciting moment at your kids’ game. Thanks to Apple’s MagSafe technology, it attaches effortlessly to the back of your iPhone, allowing wireless charging without the hassle of tangled cords. Although wireless charging is slower than wired, the latest 15-watt Qi2 standard is fast enough.

Tech gifts for mom over $100



 Photo: Provided by Amazon

Panasonic Technics Wireless Earphones EAH-AZ100

$222.99 on Amazon

$249.99 at Technics

These are my absolute favorite earphones. I wear them during walks, commutes, working at coffee shops, and even while traveling. The noise cancellation capabilities are top-notch, effectively blocking out sounds—even on airplanes. I’ve been using them for a year and am extremely impressed by their fit, sound quality, and noise reduction features.

The Bluetooth multipoint feature allows them to connect with both your phone and laptop, automatically shifting audio as you switch between devices. I own the classic black version but would highly suggest the new champagne gold finish so she can feel extra special wearing them.



 Photo: Provided by Walmart

JBL Flip 7 Portable Bluetooth Speaker

$104.90 at Walmart

$109.95 at JBL

At just over $100, the JBL Flip 7 offers sound quality that competes with portable Bluetooth speakers priced at twice its cost. I’ve used it at home, on a beach vacation in Mexico, and it has proven to be a hit among teenagers. You get a fantastic battery life of up to 16 hours per charge, excellent sound quality, plus Auracast, which allows pairing with two speakers for a richer audio experience.

The IP68 rating ensures its safety, even if accidentally submerged in water. Moms will appreciate the PushLock system, which accommodates interchangeable accessories like wrist straps and carabiner clips, both included in the package. At this price, why not get two?



 Photo: Provided by Amazon

Oura Ring 4 Smart Ring

$249 on Amazon

$349 at Oura

The Oura Ring 4 is ideal for moms to monitor important metrics such as sleep, heart rate, physical activity, and blood oxygen levels. Additionally, it includes tracking features for pregnancy, menopause, and perimenopause symptoms. Personally, I appreciate the organized app that provides feedback on stress levels, readiness throughout the day, as well as daily snapshots.

It’s comfortable to wear, stylish (especially the new ceramic model), and boasts a week-long battery life on a single charge. One caveat is that to access the full range of features, a $5.99 monthly subscription is required. However, for the insights it offers, she likely won’t mind trading a fancy latte once a month.



 Photo: Provided by Amazon

Apple Watch Series 11 Smart Watch

$329 on Amazon

$329 at Walmart

I adore the Apple Watch Series 11, and many mothers I know are keen on it as well. The upgrades from previous versions include a smoother, more resilient screen, improved battery life (a common issue with the Apple Watch), and real-time translation features.

Busy moms will appreciate the new wrist gestures that make it easy to dismiss notifications and answer calls when their hands are occupied. “If you’re seeking a premium gift for your mom, I bought the Apple Watch Series 11 to upgrade from my Series 7. I love it for tracking my workouts, but also appreciate the Find My Phone function since my memory isn’t what it used to be,” Marta shared.



 Photo: courtesy of Skaff

Customized SCUF Valor Pro Wireless Game Controller

$209.99 at Scarf

Moms can be gamers too! Sometimes they find themselves sharing gear with their little gamers. A personalized game controller makes for a thoughtful and unique gift. You can customize colors for the faceplate, thumbsticks, rings, D-pad, and even bumpers and triggers. Just like that, mom has her very own controller!

This will be her pride and joy, ensuring the kids won’t be borrowing it. More importantly, she’ll appreciate knowing it was made with love. “I’m a gamer, and what I really want is a customized SCUF Valor Pro Wireless controller,” says Dayna, 35. “I share my system with my children. It would be wonderful to have something special just for me.”




 Photo: Provided by Amazon

TheraGun Prime Massage Gun

$259.99 on Amazon

$259.99 at Therabody

For moms who enjoy morning runs, afternoon walks, home workouts, and yoga classes, muscle soreness can become a reality with age. While some high-end massage guns can be pricey, entry-level options provide much-needed relief. “I’ve been wanting a massage gun, but it’s something I wouldn’t buy for myself. I take a bike class regularly, and my legs ache by day’s end, especially while managing small children at home. Having a massage gun for evening relief would be amazing,” shares Melissa, 30.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Battling for Clarity Amid the Echo Chambers of Big Tech

Posted on by
Reply

Hi there! Welcome to TechScape. I’m your host, Blake Montgomery. Today, I’m pondering whether it’s time to upgrade from my iPhone 11 Pro. Tech news is filled with ongoing narratives from Silicon Valley, advice on how to sidestep annual smartphone upgrade cycles, and discussions on artificial intelligence in government, for better or worse.

Decoding Silicon Valley’s Narrative

The encroachment of technology can often seem unavoidable. This has likely always been the case, but the feeling is increasingly backed by Big Tech’s own supportive media ecosystem.

My colleague Nick Robbins – Early Report:

If you’re seeking insights from key figures in the tech world, you’ll frequently encounter them on programs like Sourcery, which act as safe havens for an industry wary of critical media. Some new media platforms are created by the companies themselves, while others, like fast-moving sharks, occupy niches favored by tech billionaires. Industry leaders such as Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, Sam Altman, and Satya Nadella have recently engaged in lengthy, cozy interviews, while entities like Palantir and Andreessen Horowitz have ventured into launching their own media ventures this year.

In a landscape where many Americans express distrust toward major tech firms and believe that artificial intelligence will negatively affect society, Silicon Valley has crafted its own alternative media network, turning CEOs, founders, and investors into lasting and cherished celebrities. What began as a few adoring podcasters has evolved into a comprehensive ecosystem of publications and shows, supported by some of the most influential entities in the tech sector.

However, as these echo chambers within Big Tech expand, so do the critical voices emerging from within the companies.

My colleague Varsha Bansal reports on two recent developments. U.S. AI raters (a new type of contracted content moderator for AI) are discouraging their friends and family from utilizing AI. In Seattle, over 1,000 Amazon employees have anonymously signed an open letter expressing concerns that the rapid implementation of AI across the company and its products jeopardizes the environment and the jobs of its workforce.

1 dozen AI evaluators who verify the accuracy of AI-generated responses shared with the Guardian that upon realizing the capabilities of chatbots and image generators—along with the inaccuracies of their outputs—they began to advise friends and family against using generative AI altogether or at least to approach it with caution. These trainers are involved with various AI models, including Google’s Gemini, Elon Musk’s Grok, along with other popular and lesser-known bots.

More than 1,000 Amazon employees signed the open letter, expressing “grave concerns” regarding AI development and asserting that the company’s “all-costs-justification-at-warp-speed” strategy towards powerful technologies poses a threat to “democracy, our jobs, and our planet.”

This letter, which was made public on Wednesday and signed anonymously by Amazon staff, emerged a month after the company announced mass layoffs aimed at promoting AI usage in its operations. It carries various demands about Amazon’s impact on workplace conditions and the environment. Employees are urging the company to power all data centers with clean energy and to ensure that its AI-driven products and services do not facilitate “violence, surveillance, or mass deportation.”

ChatGPT and Mental Health

Tips for Not Buying New Gadgets This Holiday Season

New iPhone 16. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

Black Friday online sales hit $8.6 billion in the U.S., according to Adobe Analytics. You might be one of the excited buyers, or perhaps, like me, you think your sputtering phone, laptop, or tablet will last another year, even if it’s cracked or barely holding a charge. The cost of a complete upgrade can be daunting.

Yet, alternatives are arising. Devices are becoming easier to repair, including Apple products. This means that even if your gadget is aging, there are often budget-friendly ways to obtain the technology you need without purchasing new devices. My colleague Alan Martin covers refurbished devices and shares five tips for navigating these options.

Understand Refurbished Terms

Refurbished can mean a variety of things. Pay close attention to the condition of the battery and what assurances are provided. Peer-to-peer purchases can be risky. The terms “used,” “secondhand,” and “refurbished” can sometimes be misleading. This is what separates reputable marketplaces like Back Market, MusicMagpie, and Refurbed from platforms where you buy directly from individuals such as Facebook Marketplace and Craigslist.

Review Warranties and Return Policies

If issues arise, you’ll want to make sure you’re covered.

Examine Seller Reputation

Check customer reviews and online feedback. On eBay, look for sellers participating in the company’s refurbished product program.

Research Selected Devices

The older the device, the more significant the discount, but if you need to replace it sooner, this could lead to extra costs. Especially for mobile phones and laptops, keeping them updated ensures longevity.

Don’t Sacrifice Quality for Cost

A low price is only worthwhile if the quality is indeed delivered. We prioritize customer service and a transparent refurbishment process over just saving a few bucks.

“When buying refurbished, the best advice is to go through trusted retailers like Back Market, Giffgaff, and Vodafone. If you’re using eBay, look for items labeled as ‘certified refurbished,’” technology journalist Thomas Deehan mentioned in an interview.

Read more: From shockproof cases to updates: How to extend your smartphone’s life

AI in Government: Inept Lawyers, Automated Bureaucracy

Brazilian flag reflected in the capital Brasilia. Photo: Sergio Lima/AFP/Getty Images

Artificial intelligence is infiltrating various workplaces, even those funded by taxpayer dollars. The stakes in election processes and judicial decisions are far greater than those faced by private firms selling errant products, making the use of AI in government appear to be a reckless venture. However, the sluggishness of administrative processes is a global challenge, rendering AI’s potential for efficiency highly appealing. The adoption of AI in government remains in its nascent stages, producing mixed outcomes.

On the upside, countries like Brazil, Germany, and Japan are leveraging generative AI to enhance their bureaucratic functions and increase participatory processes. Nathan E. Sanders and Bruce Schneier, co-authors of the book Rewiring Democracy: How AI Will Transform Our Politics, Government, and Citizenship, note:

Brazil is notorious for its high litigation rates, with more lawyers per capita than the United States. Its courts are consistently overwhelmed with cases, leading to a backlog that costs the government billions.

Since 2019, the Brazilian government has been actively using AI to automate judicial processes. Rather than making legal rulings, AI assists in redistributing workloads, conducting legal research, transcribing hearings, identifying duplicate submissions, preparing initial signature orders, and clustering similar cases for joint assessment, all aimed at making the justice system more efficient. The impact has been significant; Brazil’s Federal Supreme Court backlog reached its lowest point in 33 years in 2025.

In Germany, new tools like Wahlweise and Wahl.chat allow the creation of an AI-powered official wall-o-mat that facilitates interactive discussions with voters, providing tailored information based on their individual interests rather than static web content outlining various political parties’ stances.

In Japan, last year, 33-year-old engineer Takahiro Anno entered the Tokyo gubernatorial race as an independent candidate, finishing fifth among 56 candidates, largely due to his innovative use of a certified AI avatar. This avatar responded to 8,600 voter queries during a continuous 17-day YouTube livestream, capturing global interest in campaign innovation.

Two months ago, Anno was elected to the Japanese Senate, again harnessing AI to engage constituents, this time answering over 20,000 questions. His new party, Team Mirai, pledges to address public queries during committee meetings based on feedback from the Mirai Congress app.

Now for the downside. In California, government attorneys neglected to verify the accuracy of AI-generated outputs while attempting to prosecute an individual. My colleague Cecilia Nowell reports on how a prosecutor’s office in California utilized AI for at least one criminal case, resulting in filings that contained inaccuracies known as “hallucinations.”

The Nevada County District Attorney’s Office in Northern California recently utilized AI to prepare court documents, which led to incorrect citations. District Attorney Jesse Wilson stated, “Once the error was discovered, the application was immediately retracted.”

Defense and civil rights attorneys contend that AI has also been deployed in other criminal court filings.

The Broader TechScape

Source: www.theguardian.com

How Major Tech Firms Are Cultivating Media Ecosystems to ‘Shape the Online Narrative’

Posted on by
Reply

The introduction to tech mogul Alex Karp’s interview on Sourcely, a YouTube show by the digital finance platform Brex, features a mix of him waving the American flag accompanied by a remix of AC/DC’s “Thunderstruck.” While strolling through the company’s offices, Karp avoided questions about Palantir’s contentious ties with ICE, focusing instead on the company’s strengths while playfully brandishing a sword and discussing how he re-buried his childhood dog Rosita’s remains near his current residence.

“It’s really lovely,” comments host Molly O’Shea as she engages with Karp.

For those wanting insights from key figures in the tech sector, platforms like Sourcery provide a refuge for an industry that’s increasingly cautious, if not openly antagonistic, towards critical media. Some new media initiatives are driven by the companies themselves, while others occupy niches favored by the tech billionaire cohort. In recent months, prominent figures like Mark Zuckerberg, Elon Musk, Sam Altman, and Satya Nadella have participated in lengthy, friendly interviews, with companies like Palantir and Andreessen Horowitz launching their own media ventures this year.

A significant portion of Americans harbor distrust towards big tech and believe artificial intelligence is detrimental to society. Silicon Valley is crafting its own alternative media landscape, where CEOs, founders, and investors take center stage. What began as a handful of enthusiastic podcasters has evolved into a comprehensive ecosystem of publications and shows, supported by some of the leading entities in tech.

Pro-tech influencers, such as podcast host Rex Fridman, have historically fostered close ties with figures like Elon Musk, yet some companies this year opted to eliminate intermediaries entirely. In September, venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz introduced the a16z blog on Substack. Notable author Katherine Boyle highlighted her longstanding friendship with JD Vance. This podcast has surged to over 220,000 subscribers on YouTube, featuring OpenAI CEO Sam Altman last month. Andreessen Horowitz is a leading investor.

“What if the future of media is shaped not by algorithms or traditional bodies, but by independent voices directly interacting with audiences?” the company posited in its Substack announcement. Previously, it invested $50 million into digital media startup BuzzFeed with a similar ambition, which ultimately fell to penny stock levels.

The a16z Substack also revealed this month its new eight-week media fellowship aimed at “operators, creators, and storytellers shaping the future of media.” This initiative involves collaboration with a16z’s new media team, characterized as a collective of “online legends” aiming to furnish founders with the clout, flair, branding, expertise, and momentum essential for winning the online narrative.

In parallel to a16z’s media endeavors, Palantir launched a digital and print journal named Republic earlier this year, emulating the format of academic journals and think tank publications like Foreign Affairs. The journal is financially backed by the nonprofit Palantir Foundation for Defense Policy and International Affairs, headed by Karp, who reportedly contributes just 0.01 hours a week, as per his 2023 tax return.

“Too many individuals who shouldn’t have a voice are amplified, while those who ought to be heard are sidelined,” remarked Republic, which boasts an editorial team comprised of high-ranking Palantir executives.

Among the articles featured in Republic is a piece criticizing U.S. copyright restrictions for hindering AI leadership, alongside another by two Palantir employees reiterating Karp’s affirmation that Silicon Valley’s collaboration with the military benefits society at large.

Republic joins a burgeoning roster of pro-tech outlets like Arena Magazine, launched late last year by Austin-based venture capitalist Max Meyer. Arena’s motto nods to “The New Needs Friends” line from Disney’s Ratatouille.

“Arena avoids covering ‘The News.’ Instead, we spotlight The New,” reads the editor’s letter in the inaugural issue. “Our mission is to uplift those incrementally, or at times rapidly, bringing the future into the present.”

This sentiment echoes that of founders who have taken issue with publications like Wired and TechCrunch for their overly critical perspectives on the industry.

“Historically, magazines that covered this sector have become excessively negative. We plan to counter that by adopting a bold and optimistic viewpoint,” Meyer stated during an appearance on Joe Lonsdale’s podcast.

Certain facets of emerging media in the tech realm weren’t established as formal corporate media extensions but rather emerged organically, even while sharing a similarly positive tone. The TBPN video podcast, which interprets the intricacies of the tech world as high-stakes spectacles akin to the NFL Draft, has gained swift influence since its inception last year. Its self-aware yet protective atmosphere has drawn notable fans and guests, including Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg, who conducted an in-person interview to promote Meta’s smart glasses.

Another podcaster, 24-year-old Dwarkesh Patel, has built a mini-media empire in recent years with extensive collaborative discussions featuring tech leaders and AI researchers. Earlier this month, Patel interviewed Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella and toured one of the company’s newest data facilities.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Among the various trends in the tech landscape, Elon Musk has been a pioneer in adopting this method of pro-tech media engagement. Following his acquisition of Twitter in 2022, the platform has restricted links to key news entities and established auto-responses with poop emojis for reporter inquiries. Musk conducts few interviews with mainstream media yet engages in extensive discussions with friendly hosts like Rex Fridman and Joe Rogan, facing minimal challenge to his viewpoints.

Musk’s inclination to cultivate a media bubble around himself illustrates how such content can foster a disconnect from reality and promote alternative facts. His long-standing criticism of Wikipedia spurred him to create Grokipedia, an AI replica generating blatant falsehoods and results aligning with his far-right perspective. Concurrently, Musk’s chatbot Grok has frequently echoed Musk’s opinions, even going to absurd lengths to flatter him, such as asserting last week that Musk is healthier than LeBron James and could defeat Mike Tyson in a boxing match.

The emergence of new technology-centric media is part of a broader transformation in how celebrities portray themselves and the access they grant journalists. The tech industry has a historical aversion to media scrutiny, a trend amplified by scandals like the Facebook Files, which unveiled internal documents and potential harms. Journalist Karen Hao exemplified the tech sector’s sensitivity to negative press, noting in her 2025 book “Empire of AI” that OpenAI refrained from engaging with her for three years after a critical article she wrote in 2019.

The strategy of tech firms establishing their own autonomous and resonant media mirrors the entertainment sector’s approach from several years back. Press tours for film and album promotions have historically been tightly monitored, with actors and musicians subjected to high-pressure interviews judged by shows like “Hot Ones.” Political figures are adopting a similar framework, granting them access to fresh audiences and a more secure environment for self-promotion, as showcased by President Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign engaging with podcasters like Theo Fung, and California Governor Gavin Newsom’s introduction of his own political podcast this year.

While much of this emerging media does not aim to unveil misconduct or confront the powerful, it still holds certain merits. The content produced by the tech sector often reflects the self-image of its elite and the world they aspire to create, within an industry characterized by minimal government oversight and fewer probing inquiries into operational practices. Even the simplest of questions offer insights into the minds of individuals who primarily inhabit secured boardrooms and gated environments.

“If you were a cupcake, what kind would you be?” O’Shea queried Karp about Brex’s sauces.

“I prefer not to be a cupcake, as I don’t want to be consumed,” Karp replied. “I resist being a cupcake.”

quick guide

Contact us about this story





show

The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand reporting from those in the know.

If you have something to share regarding this matter, please contact us confidentially using the methods below.

Secure messaging in the Guardian app

The Guardian app has a tool to submit story tips. Messages are end-to-end encrypted, concealed within the daily activities of all Guardian mobile apps, preventing observers from knowing that you are in communication with us.

If you don’t have the Guardian app, please download it (iOS / android) and go to the menu. Select “Secure Messaging.”

SecureDrop, instant messenger, email, phone, mail

If you can safely utilize the Tor network without being monitored, you can send messages and documents to the Guardian via our SecureDrop platform.

Lastly, our guide at theguardian.com/tips lists multiple ways to contact us securely, discussing the advantages and disadvantages of each.

Illustration: Guardian Design/Rich Cousins

Thank you for your feedback.


Source: www.theguardian.com

How Google’s Custom AI Chip is Disrupting the Tech Industry

Posted on by
Reply
SEI 275896064

Ironwood is Google’s latest tensor processing unit

Nvidia’s dominance in the AI chip market is facing challenges due to a new specialized chip from Google, with several companies, such as Meta and Anthropic, planning to invest billions in Google’s tensor processing units.

What is TPU?

The growth of the AI industry heavily relies on graphics processing units (GPUs), which are designed to execute numerous parallel calculations at once, unlike the sequential processing of central processing units (CPUs) found in most computers.

Originally engineered for graphics and gaming, GPUs can handle operations involving multiple pixels simultaneously, as stated by Francesco Conti from the University of Bologna, Italy. This parallel processing is advantageous for training and executing AI models, particularly with tasks relying on matrix multiplication across extensive grids. “GPUs have proven effective due to their architecture fitting well with tasks needing high parallelism,” Conti explains.

However, their initial design for non-AI applications introduces some inefficiencies in how GPUs handle computations. Google launched Tensor Processing Units (TPUs) in 2016, which are optimized specifically for matrix multiplication, the primary operation for training and executing large-scale AI models, according to Conti.

This year, Google introduced the 7th generation TPU called Ironwood, which powers many of the company’s AI models, including Gemini and AlphaFold for protein modeling.

Are TPUs Superior to GPUs for AI?

In some ways, TPUs can be considered a specialized segment of GPUs rather than an entirely separate chip, as noted by Simon McIntosh-Smith from the University of Bristol, UK. “TPUs concentrate on GPU capabilities tailored for AI training and inference, but they still share similarities.” However, tailored design means that TPUs can enhance the efficiency of AI tasks significantly, potentially leading to savings of millions of dollars, he highlights.

Nonetheless, this focus on specialization can lead to challenges, Conti adds, as TPUs may lack flexibility for significant shifts in AI model requirements over generations. “A lack of adaptability can slow down operations, especially when data center CPUs are under heavy load,” asserts Conti.

Historically, Nvidia GPUs have enjoyed an advantage due to accessible software that assists AI developers in managing code on their chips. When TPUs were first introduced, similar support was absent. However, Conti believes that they have now reached a maturity level that allows more seamless usage. “With TPUs, we can now achieve similar functionality as with GPUs,” he states. “The ease of access is becoming increasingly crucial.”

Who Is Behind the Development of TPUs?

While Google was the first to launch TPUs, many prominent AI firms (referred to as hyperscalers) and smaller enterprises are now venturing into the development of their proprietary TPUs, including Amazon, which has created its own Trainium chips for AI training.

“Many hyperscalers are establishing their internal chip programs due to the soaring prices of GPUs, driven by demand exceeding supply, making self-designed solutions more cost-effective,” McIntosh-Smith explains.

What Will Be the TPU’s Influence on the AI Industry?

For over a decade, Google has been refining its TPUs, primarily leveraging them for its AI models. Recently, changes are noticeable as other large corporations like Meta and Anthropic are investing in considerable amounts of computing power from Google’s TPUs. “While I haven’t seen a major shift of big clients yet, it may begin to transpire as the technology matures and the supply increases,” McIntosh-Smith indicated. “The chips are now sufficiently advanced and prevalent.”

Besides providing more options for large enterprises, diversifying their options could also make economic sense, he notes. “This could lead to more favorable negotiations with Nvidia in the future,” he adds.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Tech Companies Compete for Undersea Dominance with Submarine Drones

Posted on by
Reply

The deployment of flying drones during the Ukraine conflict has drastically transformed ground combat strategies. A similar evolution appears to be underway beneath the waves.

Global navies are in a race to incorporate autonomous submarines. The Royal Navy is set to introduce a fleet of unmanned underwater vehicles (UUVs) aimed at tracking submarines and safeguarding undersea cables and pipelines for the first time. Australia has committed $1.7 billion (£1.3 billion) to develop a ‘Ghost Shark’ submarine to combat the growing presence of Chinese submarines. Concurrently, the expansive US Navy is investing billions in multiple UUV initiatives, including one already operational that can be deployed from nuclear submarines.

Scott Jamieson, managing director of sea and land defense solutions at BAE Systems—the UK’s foremost arms manufacturer and nuclear submarine builder—asserted that autonomous unmanned submarines signify “a significant shift in the underwater combat domain.” New unmanned vessels under development will enable the Navy to “scale operations in ways not previously possible” at “a fraction of the cost of manned submarines,” he noted.

Established defense giants like BAE Systems, General Dynamics, and Boeing are competing with innovative startups such as Anduril, creator of the Ghost Shark, and Germany’s Hellsing for lucrative new market possibilities. Startups argue that they can deliver solutions more rapidly and cost-effectively.

Anduril’s Ghost Shark is a large autonomous underwater vehicle (XLAUV) commissioned by the Royal Australian Navy. Photo: Rodney Braithwaite/Australian Defense Force/AFP/Getty Images

The contest for underwater dominance has persisted almost continuously for the last century, both during peacetime and in conflict.

The first nuclear-powered submarine, the American Nautilus—named after Jules Verne’s fictional vessel—was launched in 1954. Today, nuclear-powered vessels constitute the backbone of the military forces of six nations: the United States, Russia, Britain, France, China, and India, with North Korea potentially joining this group recently. This occurs amidst ongoing debates about the value of such costly weapons and their effectiveness as deterrents.

Naval forces engage in a constant game of hide and seek beneath the waves. Submarines seldom surface to evade detection. Recently, due to maintenance issues with other vessels, some British submarines spent an unprecedented nine months submerged, carrying Trident nuclear missiles that could be deployed at a moment’s notice.

Monitoring Russia’s underwater nuclear capabilities, which have been largely inactive in recent years, is crucial for the Royal Navy, especially around the Greenland-Iceland-UK (GIUK) Gap, a critical juncture for NATO allies to observe Russian activities in the North Atlantic. An executive from an arms company mentioned that the South China Sea represents another promising opportunity as China and its neighbors confront each other in a protracted territorial standoff.

Illustration of the gap between Greenland, Iceland, and the UK

Underwater drones have the potential to enhance the tracking of competing submarines. Some sensors are designed to be deployed by other unmanned probes and can remain underwater for extended periods, as per the aspirations of executives looking to market them to Britain.

A growing concern is the increase in attacks on oil and gas pipelines, exemplified by the 2022 Nord Stream incident, where a Ukrainian suspect was identified, and the 2023 attack on the Baltic Connector pipeline linking Finland and Estonia. Undersea power and internet cables are vital for the global economy, as evidenced by the disruption caused to an undersea power cable between Finland and Estonia last Christmas—just two months following the severing of two communication cables in the Baltic Sea.

Recently, the British government accused the Russian surveillance vessel Yantar of intruding into UK waters to map undersea cables, noting a 30% rise in Russian vessels threatening British waters over the past two years.

Parliament’s Defense Select Committee has raised alarms about the UK’s susceptibility to undersea sabotage—so-called “grey zone” actions—which can lead to significant disruptions without escalating to outright war. The committee warned that damage to any of the 60 undersea data and energy cables around the British Isles could “have a devastating effect on the UK.”

Andy Tomis, CEO of Cohort, a British military technology firm renowned for developing sonar sensors, highlighted that traditional manned ships, aircraft, and submarines used to track nuclear-powered submarines and potential sabotage vessels are “highly sophisticated and costly.” However, he added, “by integrating unmanned vessels with these systems, we can achieve human-like decision-making capabilities without endangering lives.”

BAE is already testing Herne’s underwater drone. Photo: BAE Systems

Cohort hopes to implement some of its towed sensors (named Crait after a sea snake) on smaller autonomous vessels.

Modern naval ships are equipped with five times more sonar sensors than active submarines. Reduced power needs are crucial for small unmanned vessels, which cannot accommodate nuclear reactors. Passive sensors that do not emit sonar “pings” complicate detection and destruction.

The Royal Navy, along with the British Army, has historically lagged in rapidly adopting the latest technologies. However, lessons from the Ukrainian military underscore the importance of swiftness and cost-effectiveness in drone production for aerial and maritime applications. In response, the Defense Ministry is advocating for the swift development of a technology demonstrator under Project Cabot.

Skip past newsletter promotions

BAE has already conducted tests using a candidate dubbed Herne. Hellsing is establishing a facility to manufacture underwater drones in Portsmouth, the Royal Navy’s home base. Anduril, led by Donald Trump fundraiser Palmer Lackey, is planning to set up a manufacturing site in the UK.

Initial contracts are expected to be awarded this year, with tests likely to take place in north-west Scotland conducted by defense company QinetiQ. A full-scale order for one or two companies, including Atlantic Net, is anticipated to address sensor needs in the GIUK area.

Sources indicate that the Royal Navy has termed the initiative “anti-submarine warfare as a service,” a play on the phrase “software as a service.” A £24 million tender announcement was published in May.

Anduril’s Dive LD autonomous underwater vehicle. American companies are considering manufacturing bases in the UK. Photo: Holly Adams/Reuters

Sidharth Kaushal, a senior fellow specializing in seapower at the Royal United Services Institute think tank, emphasized that the submarine-hunting strategies employed in recent decades “are not scalable in conflict” due to their reliance on costly and highly specialized assets.

The warship will tow a cable extending over 100 meters, equipped with an array of sonar sensors designed to detect the faintest sounds and lowest frequency vibrations. Aircraft from Britain’s fleet, like the Boeing P-8s, deploy disposable sonobuoys to locate deep-sea submarines. Simultaneously, satellites monitor the surface for wake trails left by submarine communication antennas and observe for patrols of hunter-killer submarines lurking below.

The proposal that inexpensive drones could handle much of this task is intriguing. However, Kaushal cautioned that the cost benefits “remain to be verified.” Industry leaders have indicated that large UUV fleets will still incur significant maintenance costs.

Safeguarding submarine cables presents a dual challenge, as sabotage may become more accessible and less expensive. One executive remarked that the likelihood of drones engaging each other underwater is “entirely plausible.”

The Ministry of Defense describes this initiative as “contractor-owned, contractor-operated, and naval-surveilled,” marking the first instance in which a civilian-owned vessel might partake in anti-submarine missions, thus raising the potential of becoming a military target.

“Russia’s immediate response will likely be to test and gauge this capability,” commented Ian McFarlane, head of underwater systems sales at Thales UK. Thales currently supplies the Royal Navy with sonar arrays for submarine detection, unmanned surface craft, and aerial drones, aiming to contribute to Project Cabot by integrating relevant data.

However, Mr. McFarlane insisted that involving private firms is crucial as the Royal Navy and its allies require “mass and resilience now” to address the threats posed by “increasing aggressors.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Cryptocurrency Market Plummets Over $1 Trillion in 6 Weeks Amid Tech Bubble Concerns

Posted on by
Reply

Over $1 trillion (£760 billion) has been erased from the crypto market’s valuation in the last six weeks as concerns about a tech bubble grow and hopes for a US interest rate reduction next month diminish.

According to data company CoinGecko, the value of the cryptocurrency market, which tracks over 18,500 coins, has dropped by a quarter since peaking in early October.

Bitcoin has experienced a 27% decline during this time, reaching $91,212, marking its lowest point since April.

Rising worries about an artificial intelligence bubble in the stock market are causing unease among global investors, with even the CEO of Google’s parent company cautioning that “no company will be immune” if the bubble bursts.

.

The FTSE 100 index in Britain fell by 1.3% on Tuesday, marking its fourth consecutive decline and its most severe day since April. The Stoxx Europe 600, which monitors the continent’s largest companies, declined by 1.8%. Wall Street also faced losses, with the Dow Jones, Nasdaq, and S&P 500 all down approximately 1% on Tuesday.

This was followed by a significant drop in Asia, with Japan’s Nikkei Stock Average falling by 3.2% and Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index decreasing by 1.7%.

Sundar Pichai, the CEO of Google’s parent firm Alphabet, remarked in an interview with the BBC that there is a sense of “irrationality” surrounding the current AI boom. He cautioned that if the AI bubble were to burst, “no company, including us, will be exempt.”

Meanwhile, JPMorgan Chase Vice Chairman Daniel Pinto stated that the skyrocketing valuations of AI necessitate a reassessment. “There will likely be a correction,” he mentioned at the Bloomberg Africa Business Summit in Johannesburg on Tuesday. “This adjustment will also impact the rest of the sector, the S&P, and the industry.”

Klarna CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski expressed concerns this week about the vast sums of money being invested in computing infrastructure.

He told the Financial Times: “[OpenAI] has the potential to be highly successful as a company, but I’m apprehensive about the extent of these data center investments, which is my primary concern.”

The Klarna co-founder highlighted the increasing valuations of AI companies, including Nvidia, as a troubling issue. Nvidia became the first firm to achieve a market valuation of $4 trillion this year, followed by Apple and Microsoft.

Skip past newsletter promotions

“That concerns me, considering the amount of wealth currently being blindly allocated to this trend without deeper thought,” Siemiatkowski remarked.

“You might say, ‘I don’t believe NVIDIA is worth this much, but it doesn’t matter. Some wealthy individuals will lose money.’ However, the reality is that due to index funds and their mechanisms, one might assume their pension is a sound investment.”

AI bubbles are viewed as one of the most significant risks to the stock market, with research from Bank of America indicating that 45% of fund managers surveyed consider AI bubbles to be the paramount risk. tail risk.

Gold, typically regarded as a safe-haven asset, has also seen a decline. Spot prices dropped by 0.3% on Tuesday morning to $4,033.29 an ounce, following a one-week low.

This drop occurs as expectations around a US Federal Reserve (Fed) interest rate reduction next month wane. Higher interest rates make gold less appealing due to its non-increasing yield.

Nonetheless, Giovanni Staunovo, an analyst at Swiss investment bank UBS, mentioned that while gold prices may fall further, he anticipates a rebound soon.

“With the Fed projected to lower interest rates multiple times in the coming quarters and the strong trend of central banks diversifying into gold, we predict that gold prices will stabilize soon,” he stated.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Jeff Bezos Allegedly Starts New AI Venture with Himself as CEO

Posted on by
Reply

Jeff Bezos, the billionaire founder and former CEO of Amazon, is set to return as CEO after stepping down four years ago. This time, he will serve as co-CEO of an AI startup called Project Prometheus. New York Times reported this from an anonymous source.

The startup is aiming to innovate AI solutions for engineering and manufacturing across various sectors, having secured an impressive $6.2 billion in funding—far exceeding what most companies gather in their lifetime. The company will be headed by Bezos’ co-founder and co-CEO, Vik Bajaj, a well-known technology executive and a physicist and chemist famed for his role at Google’s Moonshot Factory X, where he launched the health startup Verily.

Although the exact duration of the company’s existence is unclear, sources indicate that Project Prometheus already has a workforce of 100 people. Many of these employees were recruited from notable organizations like OpenAI, DeepMind, and Meta. Details about the project remain sparse as Bezos has not revealed its operational base or the specifics of its technology. Having been heavily involved with his aerospace venture Blue Origin as its founder and sole shareholder, this role marks Bezos’ first official position since departing from Amazon.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Mr. Bezos and Mr. Bajaj enter a highly competitive AI market, where billions have been invested in rivals like OpenAI, with even more funds directed towards the swift advancement of AI models. However, a growing number of experts are raising concerns about the financial viability of the AI industry. Notably, Michael Burry, renowned for predicting the 2008 housing crisis, has recently placed a $1 billion bet against the stock prices of Palantir and Nvidia after accusing some major tech firms of using accounting strategies to “artificially inflate profits.” Read more.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Tech Firms Collaborate with UK Child Safety Agency to Evaluate AI Tool for Generating Abuse Images

Posted on by
Reply

Under a new UK law, tech companies and child protection agencies will be granted the authority to test if artificial intelligence tools can create images of child abuse.

This announcement follows reports from a safety watchdog highlighting instances of child sexual abuse generated by AI. The number of cases surged from 199 in 2024 to 426 in 2025.

With these changes, the government will empower selected AI firms and child safety organizations to analyze AI models, including the tech behind chatbots like ChatGPT and image-generating devices such as Google’s Veo 3, to ensure measures are in place to prevent the creation of child sexual abuse images.

Kanishka Narayan, the Minister of State for AI and Online Safety, emphasized that this initiative is “ultimately to deter abuse before it happens,” stating, “Experts can now identify risks in AI models sooner, under stringent conditions.”

This alteration was made due to the illegality of creating and possessing CSAM. Consequently, AI developers and others will be prevented from producing such images during testing. Previously, authorities could only respond after AI-generated CSAM was uploaded online, but this law seeks to eliminate that issue by stopping the images from being generated at all.

The amendments are part of the Crime and Policing Bill, which also establishes a prohibition on the possession, creation, and distribution of AI models intended to generate child sexual abuse material.

During a recent visit to Childline’s London headquarters, Narayan listened to a simulated call featuring an AI-generated report of abuse, depicting a teenager seeking assistance after being blackmailed with a sexual deepfake of herself created with AI.

“Hearing about children receiving online threats provokes intense anger in me, and parents feel justified in their outrage,” he remarked.

The Internet Watch Foundation, which oversees CSAM online, reported that incidents of AI-generated abusive content have more than doubled this year. Reports of Category A material, the most severe type of abuse, increased from 2,621 images or videos to 3,086.

Girls are predominantly targeted, making up 94% of illegal AI images by 2025, with the portrayal of newborns to two-year-olds rising significantly from five in 2024 to 92 in 2025.

Kelly Smith, CEO of the Internet Watch Foundation, stated that these legal modifications could be “a crucial step in ensuring the safety of AI products before their launch.”

“AI tools enable survivors to be victimized again with just a few clicks, allowing criminals to create an unlimited supply of sophisticated, photorealistic child sexual abuse material,” she noted. “Such material commodifies the suffering of victims and increases risks for children, particularly girls, both online and offline.”

Childline also revealed insights from counseling sessions where AI was referenced. The concerns discussed included using AI to evaluate weight, body image, and appearance; chatbots discouraging children from confiding in safe adults about abuse; online harassment with AI-generated content; and blackmail involving AI-created images.

From April to September this year, Childline reported 367 counseling sessions where AI, chatbots, and related topics were mentioned, a fourfold increase compared to the same period last year. Half of these references in the 2025 sessions pertained to mental health and wellness, including the use of chatbots for support and AI therapy applications.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Gamers as Hackers: Discovering the Next Generation of Tech Talent in Unexpected Places | Bridging Fun and Purpose

Posted on by
Reply

For numerous young individuals in schools and universities, a solid understanding of digital skills is essential for future learning and employment prospects. Nonetheless, teachers face a considerable challenge in ensuring these skills are utilized effectively.

As reported by The Hacking Games, an organization focused on helping youth with hacking skills secure jobs in the cybersecurity sector, criminal groups are increasingly targeting talented teenagers within popular online gaming spaces.

This is a route that educators hope to steer their students away from, which is why Co-op, a sponsor of the Co-op Academies Trust, has collaborated with The Hacking Games. The Co-op Academies Trust serves over 20,000 students across 38 primary, secondary, and special needs schools, as well as one college in Northern England. The partnership aims to direct students with coding skills toward careers in ‘ethical hacking.’

Joe Sykes, Careers Director at the Co-op Academies Trust, comments: “In recent years, there has been a growing interest among students in technology, particularly gaming, and they are investigating how this passion might lead to future careers.

“Through our engagement with The Hacking Games, we discovered the transferable skills that exist between gaming and ethical hacking, particularly within cybersecurity. Our students found this link to be both exciting and motivating.”

“Students will find it engaging to learn about the transferable skills between gaming and ethical hacking in the technology sector, especially in cybersecurity.”

Adam Woodley, Head of Curriculum at Connell Cope College, agrees, noting that many young individuals view careers in the digital sector as a “very popular option.”

“Students have acquired highly sought-after skills through hobbies such as gaming, and they naturally desire to apply these skills in exciting career paths,” he states.

“Thus, it is crucial that they have the chance to explore the stimulating realm of ethical hacking and cybersecurity and utilize those skills to benefit society.”

Rob Elsey, Chief Digital Information Officer at Co-op, concurs. “There are numerous unfilled positions in cybersecurity,” he points out. “The more we can transform the bright, skilled young individuals we have in the UK into defenders instead of attackers, and educate them about the available opportunities, the better. This will help us confront ongoing threats as a nation.”

Driving apprenticeships and internships

Fergus Hay, co-founder of The Hacking Games, emphasizes, “It takes a community to motivate, appreciate, and empower this generation to choose the right path.” The Hacking Games’ framework assesses young people’s digital aptitudes and skills against specific criteria to identify suitable careers for them in the tech industry.

The Hacking Games is actively working on creating formal pathways (apprenticeships and internships) to digital jobs within the government or private sectors in the future. Many experts believe this route is also accessible for neurodiverse youth. However, for both neurodivergent and neurotypical individuals, gaming serves as a common training ground for hacking, remarks John Madelin, a cybersecurity veteran and Chief Product Officer at The Hacking Games.

“Many hackers I’ve encountered are gamers,” he states, adding that most young gamers do not harbor criminal intentions, “but the distinction is significant.” For many young gamers, hacking revolves around discovering new and hidden aspects of gameplay, while for some, it involves creating and selling cheat codes to other players.


Hacking Games’ assessment framework aligns a student’s aptitudes with appropriate technical jobs. Composite: Getty Images/Guardian Design

These advanced technological skills are precisely what criminal organizations seek to exploit, particularly among students less focused on academic achievement. However, Madeline asserts she can guide young hackers toward more positive paths. “It’s essential to continuously challenge and engage them,” he states. “Instead of allowing them to remain inactive, we should utilize their talents.”

The Co-op Academies Trust has already identified careers in the digital sector as crucial components of its post-primary career program. Mr. Sykes believes it is vital for all children to discern their strengths as early as possible. “Our duty as educators is to optimize outcomes in these areas.

“Individuals with strong digital skills often possess a natural inclination to think logically and solve problems creatively,” she adds.

“Blessed with a talent for technology and gaming.”

The collaboration between Co-op and The Hacking Games comes after Co-op became the target of a cyberattack earlier this year. Focused on creating social value, Co-op (an organization owned by its members rather than shareholders) sought to address the underlying causes of hacking.

“We recognize that children possess talents in technology and gaming, and that these skills can lead to hacking,” Sykes states. “Initiatives like this allow us to discuss the ramifications and legalities surrounding hacking and help students recognize the opportunities these skills can present through their ethical application.”

Potential roles in cybersecurity for major firms and organizations may involve identifying weaknesses that malicious hackers could exploit. There are also opportunities within government departments working against hacking attempts directed at critical national infrastructure.

This is one of the primary reasons The Hacking Games recently launched its HAPTAI platform. The platform aids in developing hacking aptitude profiles for young individuals by analyzing their performances in popular games and matching them with corresponding psychometric profiles. Subsequently, candidates are paired with roles and teams suited to their strengths.


Our collaboration with The Hacking Games aims to encourage children to actively harness their abilities. Composite: Getty Images/Guardian Design

Protection today, career path tomorrow

“Children can be particularly susceptible to online dangers, thus we ensure they are educated about these risks, including the legal boundaries surrounding online safety and hacking,” Sykes explains. “I believe all schools need to stay updated with current issues. This presents a real opportunity for professionals to enhance their understanding of the risks and communicate them effectively to parents.”

In the future, she envisions a national computer science curriculum that incorporates lessons on ethical hacking and PSHE (Personal, Social, Health and Economic), helping all students recognize the potential harm at all levels of the economy.

Until that vision is realized, the partnership between Co-op and The Hacking Games will persist. The Co-op Academy Walkden will be piloted in the upcoming months to raise awareness of the issue and identify talented young individuals who can contribute to the solution before scaling it into a nationwide program.

“There are vast career opportunities in the digital arena,” states Sykes. “This ultimately aids students in understanding all the positive pathways available to them and how they can significantly contribute to creating a safer world.”

learn more

Keep children and young people safe online with Barnardo’s online safety guidance

Source: www.theguardian.com

Big Tech Promises User Protection Amid Spyware Firms’ Rise in Trump Administration

Posted on by
Reply

Apple and WhatsApp have committed to continue alerting users if their devices are targeted by government hacking software, particularly in the United States, as two spyware companies aim to penetrate the Trump administration.

The two tech giants provided statements in response to questions from the Guardian, as two Israeli-founded cyber weapon manufacturers, now under U.S. ownership, aggressively seek access to the American market.

Paragon Solutions, known for its spyware called Graphite, has already reached an agreement with the Trump administration to provide U.S. immigration officials with one of the most advanced hacking tools globally as of September, following the unfreezing of a $2 million contract by the Department of Homeland Affairs with ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement).

Paragon did not reply to requests for comment.

NSO Group, another firm cited by the Biden administration in 2021 for conducting business “that goes against the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States,” revealed over the weekend that David Friedman, former U.S. ambassador to Israel during Donald Trump’s initial term, will become executive chairman of the parent company that owns NSO. The company has reportedly been recently acquired by new investors, including American film producer Robert Simmons.

Both Paragon and NSO Group develop spyware capable of infiltrating any phone without the knowledge of the user, enabling the spyware operator to read texts, eavesdrop on calls, track locations, and turn mobile devices into wiretapping tools or remote cameras.

While both companies defend their products as tools to combat serious crimes and thwart potential terrorist activities, their software is also weaponized by government clients to spy on individuals they wish to monitor covertly, including journalists, business leaders, and human rights advocates.

Apple and WhatsApp have consistently opposed the proliferation of spyware worldwide, notifying users via alerts when potential hacking attempts are detected in various countries, including Italy, Spain, and India.

In October, a U.S. court ruled in favor of WhatsApp after six years of legal battles, preventing NSO from targeting WhatsApp users in the future.

However, concerns arise due to the close connections between Apple, WhatsApp’s parent company Meta, and the Trump administration regarding whether they will persist in warning users amid such spyware threats in the United States.

“Threat notifications are intended to individually inform and assist users who may be victims of mercenary spyware, irrespective of geographic location,” Apple stated.

“WhatsApp aims to safeguard our users by disrupting hacking attempts from mercenary spyware, advancing protective measures, and notifying those whose devices are under threat, no matter where they are globally,” commented a WhatsApp representative.

Former FBI Director Christopher Wray testified that the FBI considered utilizing NSO’s Pegasus but ultimately declined to incorporate commercial spyware into its operations. Experts express concern over the legality surrounding the use of spyware in the United States, given existing laws that restrict targeted surveillance of Americans.

An aide to Democratic Senator Ron Wyden, a member of the Select Committee on Intelligence, mentioned that current immigration officials provided a preliminary briefing to his office, stating that “the policy is still under development,” but there has been no feedback since the government shutdown began in October.

When asked about the potential lifting of sanctions imposed on NSO by the Biden administration in 2021, Friedman mentioned during a phone call from Israel that he has yet to discuss the matter with President Trump, stating, “I hope that happens, but I have not made that request yet.” He added it is “too early to determine” when NSO may pursue the removal of these sanctions.

Regarding mercenary spyware, John Scott Railton, a senior research fellow at the University of Toronto’s Citizen Research Institute, warns that “no one is safe.” He is recognized as a leading authority on tracking and disrupting spyware usage against civil society members globally.

“American firms are unprepared to detect and defend against this type of menace domestically, similarly to healthcare institutions, legal professionals, politicians, and the general populace,” he noted. “The last thing America needs now is a silent spyware epidemic.”

Paragon initially signed a contract with ICE in 2024 under the Biden administration. The relatively small agreement went unnoticed by the White House until its official announcement, several insiders disclosed. Wired reported. The contract was subsequently suspended to ascertain whether it complied with a significant executive order issued earlier. Signed by the White House in May 2023, it prohibited the operational use of spyware that “poses a risk to national security or has been exploited by foreign entities for human rights violations globally.”

At that point, Paragon was free from surveillance controversies, unlike NSO Group, which faced scrutiny for its Pegasus spyware targeting a plethora of civil society organizations.

However, the situation shifted in January 2025 when WhatsApp disclosed that 90 individuals, including journalists and civil society members, had been targeted by Paragon’s Graphite.

Following this revelation, Paragon severed its ties with the Italian government, alleging that Italy violated its service terms by using spyware against civil society members.

Since then, media accounts have detailed how several Italian journalists, at least two executives from Italy’s largest bank, an Italian human rights advocate, and an Italian political strategist were targeted by hacking spyware in 2024.

The current government led by Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has admitted that the software was employed against certain activists by Italian agencies with legal authority, but has not accepted responsibility for other prominent targets.

“This is Italy’s Watergate,” remarked former Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi in an interview.

“This is a tool that only governments can wield. If the Italian government continues to deny its usage, the question for multiple Italian business leaders and journalists remains, who is responsible?” he said. “I may not be closely aligned with journalists, but freedom of the press is essential in a free democracy. Using this tool against journalists is intolerable.”

Some officials are worried that this Graphite may now be under the control of U.S. immigration authorities.

“ICE is already undermining due process by hastily detaining children and families who pose no threat, ruining lives,” Wyden stated to the Guardian. “I am extremely concerned about how ICE will utilize spyware, facial recognition, and other technologies to further infringe upon the rights of American citizens and those whom Donald Trump views as adversaries.”

A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security did not respond to a request for comment.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Incredible Valuations of AI Firms

Posted on by
Reply

Greetings! Welcome to TechScape. I’m your host, Blake Montgomery. If you wish to subscribe to our newsletter, please share this email with 5 friends and encourage them to sign up, much like a chain letter promising 5 years of bad luck. This week in news, AI companies have reached astonishing financial highs, with valuations soaring to $5 trillion, a record $100 billion quarterly earnings, and a series of agreements totaling close to $600 billion.

The staggering numbers of the AI boom make criticism challenging.

Last week, Nvidia’s market valuation hit the $5 trillion mark. Just three months earlier, it had become the first company ever to reach a $4 trillion valuation. Similarly, Microsoft joined Apple in hitting the $4 trillion valuation last week. In addition, companies like Meta, Microsoft, Amazon, and Alphabet reported massive quarterly earnings. Notably, Google’s parent company generated $100 billion in its first quarter. Amazon experienced remarkable expansion in its cloud computing sector, leading to a 13% increase in its stock price. However, Meta faced an unexpected tax bill of $16 billion. All major tech firms except Apple have increased their capital spending forecasts, indicating plans to invest billions more in the essential infrastructure that backs AI. These revisions alone add tens of billions to an already staggering total in the hundreds of billions. For instance, Alphabet has projected capital expenditures of $91 billion to $93 billion for next year, an increase from the $75 billion initially stated in February and the revised $85 billion announced in July.

Not to be outdone by its publicly traded competitor, OpenAI has transitioned to a for-profit model and is contemplating an initial public offering with a potential valuation of $1 trillion. The world’s highest-valued startups are actively making deals, including a partnership with Nvidia that involves an investment of $100 billion in OpenAI as of September. Furthermore, Microsoft recently entered a contract with OpenAI for $250 billion in Azure cloud services. Oracle, another cloud services giant, also struck a $300 billion investment agreement with OpenAI in September. On Monday, the creator of ChatGPT announced a $38 billion deal with Amazon Web Services, as OpenAI commits to a staggering total of $588 billion in expenditures over the coming years.

Nvidia is now valued higher than Germany’s total annual economic output projected for 2025, estimated at $4.66 billion. To put this into perspective, Nvidia’s market capitalization surpasses the collective valuation of all German companies, which is expected to be approximately $2.4 trillion in 2024, according to the World Bank. No single company should eclipse the world’s third-largest economy, a nation with 83.5 million residents whose economic landscape supports an entire continent.

read more: Boom or bubble? Inside $3 trillion in AI data center spending | Artificial Intelligence (AI) | Guardian

Understanding the economics surrounding the AI boom poses significant challenges, hindering straightforward criticism. How should one respond to such overwhelming data? Even the keenest analyses can feel dwarfed by the magnitude of a billion-dollar data center. The scale of these figures defies comprehension; there’s hardly a personal context with which to relate. How do we consider a spending plan of $91 billion? What does it mean to make choices in the realm of hundreds of billions? It’s bewildering. Describing Meta’s earnings as “mixed” feels odd, yet that’s the assessment from Wall Street experts.

The boom has seen billions circulating in transactions between these corporations, raising red flags regarding inflated valuations and financial risk. If one entity stumbles, a domino effect could ensue, potentially dragging the U.S. economy down with it. Nonetheless, these companies show no signs of diminishing their collective enthusiasm.




File photo: COMPUTEX in Taipei
File photo: Nvidia Blackwell GPUs on display at COMPUTEX in Taipei, Taiwan, June 4, 2024. Reuters/Ann Wang/File photo
Photo: Anne Wang/Reuters

On the populist front, critics argue that AI has failed to establish any significant use cases beyond something as trivial as assisting with homework. Regardless of how many jobs a CEO might eliminate, replacements will remain inadequate. Approximately 95% of AI pilots that companies have undertaken have faltered, as MIT researchers discovered in August.

The economic magnitude of the AI boom is unfathomably vast, corresponding with its digital scale. Large language models like ChatGPT and Claude Sonnet operate partially through parameters—variables that help the model predict subsequent words. These invisible adjusters can modulate responses by the hundreds of billions, with projections indicating that GPT-5 could reach into trillions.

The physical ramifications of AI mirror the considerable economic scale of this technology. Dara Kerr, a technology reporter for the Guardian, recently reported from the Tahoe-Reno Industrial Center, which houses the largest data center in the nation along with several smaller establishments. She detailed its extraordinary scale:

The Tahoe-Reno Industrial Center stretches from Interstate 80 to the mountains of the arid Nevada desert. This vast complex encompasses tens of thousands of acres and houses roughly 200 companies involved in logistics, fulfillment, and data center technology, including Google, Microsoft, and Tesla. Some firms maintain multiple data centers spanning several times the length of a football field throughout desert valleys. This industrial area occupies 65% of the county’s land, creating a scale that’s nearly incomprehensible.

Should you purchase that gadget?

Skip past newsletter promotions

You can now wager on American elections by contributing to the President of the United States




US President Donald Trump
Photo: President Donald Trump via Truth Social and Reuters

Donald Trump’s Truth Social is collaborating with Crypto.com to facilitate betting on election outcomes, as announced by its parent company last week. Trump Media and Technology Group is set to launch a “Truth Prediction” feature allowing users to “trade predictive contracts on major events and milestones, ranging from political elections to changes in interest rates, inflation, commodity prices, and significant sports events,” although a launch date remains uncertain.

TMTG Director Devin Nunes stated regarding the feature, “For too long, elites have strictly controlled these markets. With Truth Prediction, we’re democratizing information, enabling regular Americans to harness collective wisdom and converting free speech into actionable foresight.” Ironically, Nunes criticizes the “global elite” from a position of notable power within the government.

There’s something unsettling about this arrangement, as if the contender in a match is simultaneously the bookmaker. Mr. Trump, as President, invites voters to invest in his campaign while implementing policies that directly impact the interest rates users can wager on. As he flirts with the notion of an unprecedented third term, does the American public want to take bets on his potential to achieve it?

Even creating the truth prediction feature seems like a dubious endeavor. Crypto.com has contributed $11 million to Trump’s initiatives, as reported by the Financial Times. Additionally, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission closed its investigation during Trump’s administration while the company sought banking authorization from regulators. Trump Media and Technology Group signed a substantial deal to acquire billions of dollars’ worth of Kronos, the token associated with Crypto.com.

Gambling has become increasingly ingrained in American culture, with trading on election outcomes only legalized last year. A recent analysis by the Financial Times observed that the betting volume on prediction markets like Karshi averages $1 billion each week. This trend initiated with sports betting, which has reached unprecedented levels. My colleague Brian Armen Graham discussed the fallout from a scandal that shook the professional basketball world before Halloween, dubbed Operation No Bet, leading to the arrest of NBA players, coaches, and dozens of others.

The NBA gambling scandal marks the peak of a lengthy relationship between professional leagues and the massive gambling industry, which has transitioned from partnership to controversy. This represents the most significant corruption crisis in Major League Baseball following the legalization of gambling in numerous U.S. states and serves as a clear reflection of how embedded gambling has become within professional sports.

When will politics face its own “no-bets strategy”?

Wider TechScape

Source: www.theguardian.com

Enshittification: Cory Doctorow’s 2022 Term Explaining How Tech Companies Have Deteriorated Our Lives

Posted on by
Reply

Does your phone feel less capable than it used to? Enshittification might be the culprit

Hector Retamal/AFP via Getty Images

Enshifted
Cory Doctorow (MCD Books)

“Enshittification,” much like “shrinkflation” and “greenwashing,” is a newly coined term that feels familiar, perfectly expressing a widespread yet subtle issue.

We’re acutely aware that websites and apps often deteriorate or become worse over time as their owners exploit users for profit. This is visible everywhere, from Instagram swapping your chronological feed for a mashup of influencer content to Apple compelling users to upgrade by limiting repair options.

Cory Doctorow introduced the term in 2022 and elaborated on it in his recent book. More information: Why everything suddenly went bad and what to do about it serves as both an analysis and a call to action.

The strategy behind enshittification is for platforms like Facebook to establish and provide excellent services. Users flock to them for convenience and enjoyment. The company then waits until we are deeply connected—friends, local groups, schools, etc.—making it cumbersome to leave.

Once the user base becomes substantial, advertisers get locked in as well. The company then shifts focus to profits, inundating services with ads and algorithms, leading to a decline in user experience. This creates pressure on advertisers. The platform then becomes toxic, primarily benefitting shareholders, and users find it difficult to quit. As Doctorow states, we are trapped in a decaying entity.

In the past, poor businesses would have faced market consequences. If a café serves bad coffee, we’d simply find another. Today, however, tech companies have formed monopolies, making substantial profits that allow them to sustain their dominance. They purchase competitors merely to shut them down, lobby for lenient regulations, and secure exclusive contracts. (For instance, Google pays Apple $20 billion annually to remain the default search engine in Apple’s Safari browser.)

Enshifted Companies that seemingly harvest excessive personal data expose industry secrets, knowing they’ll charge more for goods during paydays since consumers are less likely to negotiate. Or companies deploy algorithms to suppress gig economy wages or implement keystroke monitoring systems that alert supervisors when we pause typing.

Although these negative aspects aren’t entirely new to readers, consuming them in large quantities can leave a sour taste. They can even lead intelligent individuals to resent themselves for being misunderstood in various ways.

Indeed, the goal is simply to do what the company was designed to do: maximize profit. However, with advances in computers, algorithms, and the Internet, things have spiraled out of control, allowing for techniques far more sophisticated than those available just a decade ago.

Doctorow cautions that regulators meant to protect us are often outmatched by the companies they monitor. Yet, he firmly believes they are part of the solution.

While there have been favorable developments in the European Union and under President Joe Biden in the U.S., substantial work remains to be done, as tech companies may innovate ways to harm us more quickly than can be counteracted. We can demand more accountability from politicians, and well-crafted legislation supported by effective regulators can help.

However, the potential power of boycotts remains largely unaddressed—tech companies need us more than we need them. It’s feasible to abandon social media, favor local businesses, and utilize ethical search engines. The more individuals take such actions, the likelier others will follow.

Whether it pertains to travel, clothing, or food, many of us attempt to “vote” with our wallets. Perhaps it’s time we extend this practice to our online choices.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Ex-Intel CEO’s Quest to Create Christian AI: ‘Accelerate the Second Coming of Christ’ | Tech Insights

Posted on by
Reply

In March, Patrick Gelsinger joined Intel’s executive team, just three months after being removed as the company’s CEO and facing litigation from shareholders. Gloo is a technology firm dedicated to what he describes as the “faith ecosystem,” providing Salesforce and chatbots for churches, along with an AI assistant designed to automate pastoral and ministry support.

Gelsinger’s transition comes at a time when the U.S. tech sector is re-engaging with political activities, as the second Trump administration revives religious conservatism in Washington, D.C. Some notable figures are funding Donald Trump’s re-election campaign and actively pursuing government contracts.

As the Executive Chairman and Head of Technology at Gloo (now free from shareholder lawsuits), Gelsinger aims to promote Christian values within the company’s initiatives. Silicon Valley, the state capital, and beyond have become focal points. He has attracted $110 million in strategic investments. His campaign encompasses a call for AI technologies that reflect Christian ethics, with high-tech products developed by Gloo designed around prevalent large-scale language models, customized to align with users’ theological beliefs.

“My life’s mission is to develop technologies that enhance the quality of life for every individual globally and accelerate the return of Christ,” he stated.

Speakers discuss trust conditioning in AI at the Gloo hackathon. Photo: Mike Mauser

Gloo claims to support “over 140,000 faith, ministry, and nonprofit leaders.” Although Gloo’s client base is smaller compared to major AI industry players, it’s worth noting that approximately 800 million users engage with ChatGPT weekly.

Gelsinger, a committed Christian, has described his “mission field” as influencing the culture of Silicon Valley. He observes a “very loud, very visible, very specifically Christian tech culture” emerging in the area. Scholars like Damian Williams from the University of North Carolina at Charlotte explore how religious beliefs shape technology, drawing parallels with figures like Peter Thiel and Andreessen Horowitz, who caution about the Antichrist’s looming presence without adherence to a particular technological framework. Katherine Boyle, closely connected with Vice President JD Vance, recognizes Gelsinger’s longstanding advocacy for Christian principles. In 2013, he founded Transforming the Bay with Christ, aimed at revitalizing the Christian spiritual movement in the region.

During a seminar co-hosted by a conservative university and the Christian Post on October 7, Gelsinger described AI’s development as “another Gutenberg moment,” a significant transformative change that parallels the Reformation. Just as Martin Luther used the printing press to ignite “the greatest age of human invention,” he perceives a similar faith-driven potential to alter history through AI today.

“The church adopted the great invention of its time to fundamentally change humanity,” Gelsinger remarked regarding the printing press. “So my inquiry today is whether we will embrace this? Can AI be molded into a technology that powerfully embodies the Church and its mission?”

Jesus Hackathon

Gloo aims to influence AI, Christianity, and faith technology beyond just Silicon Valley. The company also supports the Christian tech ecosystem through funding and events like a three-day hackathon that followed the seminar at Colorado Christian University. The event attracted over 600 participants vying for more than $250,000 in prizes, with participant numbers projected to triple by 2024.

Despite its growth, the hackathon faced challenges. Ryan Siebert, an AI product developer, discovered a vulnerability in Gloo’s latest LLM, which is not publicly available, and it provided him with a methamphetamine recipe due to prompt injection. He informed the president of Gloo AI about the issue. A spokesperson from Gloo mentioned that as the product is still in “pre-beta” development, participants were encouraged to test the new LLM and offer feedback.

Skip past newsletter promotions
Audience at the Gloo hackathon. Photo: Mike Mauser

Meanwhile, Gelsinger indicated that his message regarding Christian AI is resonating well in Washington, D.C. In a conversation with the Guardian, he mentioned introducing Gloo’s efforts to various legal advocacy groups and Congressional members. Although he didn’t specify the organizations or politicians, he noted that some Congress members have shown interest in integrating Gloo products into church activities.

Goo’s influence also spans conservative political circles. Brandon Showalter, a journalist for the Christian Post and co-host of the seminar with Gloo, expressed hope that society would view care for transgender youth as “unthinkable as an ice pick lobotomy.” An analyst at the Heritage Foundation, which is behind Project 2025, participated in a panel moderated by Showalter, providing insights on AI regulation. On October 17th, Gelsinger delivered his “Gutenberg Moment” speech at Liberty University’s CEO Summit, alongside keynote speeches from figures like Liz Truss, Michael Flynn, and Chick-fil-A’s Chairman, Dan T. Cathy.

Gelsinger appears just as at ease in these settings as he was as an honored guest at Joe Biden’s 2022 State of the Union address. Like a pragmatic industry leader, he also engages in public records and has supported political movements across party lines.

Gloo itself maintains an ecumenical tone in its messaging. The hackathon avoided political discussions and sectarian divides. In a Discord chat, participants shared plans to create an AI bot for a “biblical response” to the assassination of conservative figure Charlie Kirk, where organizers advised keeping conversations focused on Jesus, despite recognizing the relevance of politics. The hackathon team, comprised of Leah and Wes Brooks, produced open-source AI tools aimed at interoperability among faith-based and other applications, highlighting the diverse backgrounds of participants, including a female pastor. “I wasn’t even required to sign a faith declaration,” Leah Brooks remarked. Gloo also asserts it does not “prohibit” Islamic organizations from utilizing its technology.

Patrick Gelsinger. Photo: Mike Mauser

“We’re not aiming to take a theological stance. Our goal is to create a technology platform versatile enough for Lutherans, Episcopalians, and Catholics to effectively utilize it,” Gelsinger informed the Guardian. “We want to represent a broad spectrum of faith while also accommodating organizations that maintain a non-sectarian view,” such as Alcoholics Anonymous.

Gelsinger’s ambition is to integrate faith into AI technology. He leads Gloo’s Flourishing AI initiative, which assesses large-scale language models’ effects on human well-being across seven dimensions. Essentially, it evaluates whether a language model contributes positively to the religious lives of its users. This initiative draws from a research program at Harvard University’s human flourishing program. Models such as Grok 3, DeepSeek-R1, and GPT-4.1 score well on average for supporting users with financial inquiries, achieving around 81 points out of 100, but fare poorly in enhancing users’ spiritual growth, with an average score of just 35 points out of 100 according to Gloo’s metrics.

Gloo’s endeavors have yet to gain significant traction within Silicon Valley. A spokesperson stated that the IT department is “beginning to reach out” to leading AI firms.

“I want people to care,” Gelsinger remarked.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Labor Refutes Claims of Permitting Tech Giants to Exploit Copyrighted Content for AI Training

Posted on by
Reply

In response to significant backlash from writers, arts, and media organizations, the Albanon government has definitively stated that tech companies will not be allowed to freely access creative content for training artificial intelligence models.

Attorney General Michel Rolland is expected to announce this decision on Monday, effectively rejecting a contentious proposal from the Ministry of Justice. productivity committee, which had support from technology companies.

“Australian creatives are not just top-tier; they are essential to the fabric of Australian culture, and we need to ensure they have robust legal protections,” said Mr. Rowland.

The commission faced outrage in August when its interim report on data usage in the digital economy suggested exemptions from copyright law, effectively granting tech companies free access to content for AI training.

Sign up: AU breaking news email

Recently, Scott Farquhar, co-founder of Atlassian and chairman of the Australian Technology Council, told the National Press Club that revising existing restrictions could “unlock billions in foreign investment for Australia”.

The proposal triggered a strong backlash from creators, including Indigenous rapper Adam Briggs, who testified in September that allowing companies to utilize local content without fair remuneration would make it “hard to put the genie back in the bottle.”

Australian author Anna Funder argued that large-scale AI systems rely on “massive unauthorized appropriation of every available book, artwork, and performance that can be digitized.”

The same inquiry uncovered that the Productivity Commission did not engage with the creative community or assess the potential effects of its recommendations before releasing its report. This led Green Party senator Sarah Hanson-Young to state that the agency had “miscalculated the importance of the creative industries.”

The Australian Council of Trade Unions also cautioned against the proposal, asserting it would lead to “widespread theft” of creative works.

Higher government ministers were disrespectful, although a so-called “text and data mining” exemption may still be considered, Rowland’s statement marks the first time it has been specifically ruled out.

“While artificial intelligence offers vast opportunities for Australia and its economy, it’s crucial that Australian creators also reap the benefits,” she asserted.

The Attorney General plans to gather the government’s Copyright and AI Reference Group on Monday and Tuesday to explore alternative measures to address the challenges posed by advancing technology.

This includes discussions on whether a new paid licensing framework under copyright law should replace the current voluntary system.

Briggs says he will be replaced by AI: AI doesn’t know ‘what a lounge room in Shepparton smells like’ – video

The Australian Recording Industry Association (ARIA), one of the organizations advocating against the exemption, praised the announcement as “a substantial step forward.”

“This represents a win for creativity and Australian culture, including Indigenous culture, but more importantly, it’s a victory for common sense. The current copyright licensing system is effective,” stated ARIA CEO Annabel Hurd.

Skip past newsletter promotions

“Intellectual property law is fundamental to the creative economy, digital economy, and tech industry. It is the foundation that technology companies rely on to protect and monetize their products, driving innovation.”

Hurd emphasized that further measures are necessary to safeguard artists, including ensuring AI adheres to licensing rules.

“Artists have the right to determine how their work is utilized and to share in the value that it generates,” she stated.

“Safeguarding those frameworks is how we secure Australia’s creative sovereignty and maintain our cultural vitality.”

Media companies also expressed their support for the decision.

A spokesperson for Guardian Australia stated that this represents “a significant step towards affirming that Australia’s copyrighted content warrants protection and compensation.”

“Australian media, publishers, and creators all voiced strong opposition to the TDM (text and data mining) exception, asserting it would permit large-scale theft of the work of Australian journalists and creators, undermining Australia’s national interests,” the spokesperson added.

They also indicated that the Guardian seeks to establish a fair licensing system that supports genuine value exchange.

News Corp Australasia executive chairman Michael Miller remarked that the government made the “correct decision” to exclude the exemption.

“By protecting creators’ rights to control access, usage terms, and remuneration, we reinforce the efficacy of our nation’s copyright laws, ensuring favorable market outcomes,” he affirmed.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Spending the Day with British Tech Enthusiasts and Nigel Farage: One of the Rare Politicians Embracing Cryptocurrencies

Posted on by
Reply

A gray morning greets Shadwell in east London. Yet, within the historical confines of Tobacco Dock, the gloom is transformed into vibrant neon lights, sleek vehicles, and buzzing conversations about cryptocurrency.

Over two days, advocates of Web3, the envisioned future of the Internet, gathered at the venue of its former exchanges. For many attendees, the highlight is a singular figure: Nigel Farage.

“I don’t care if you like me or not, I’m a champion of this space,” declared the Reform UK leader to an audience predominantly composed of male crypto enthusiasts at the Zebu Live conference.

“Either I’m here to bolster your community, or your community is here to bolster me. Regardless, this partnership benefits us both.”

Farage is aiming to forge a business relationship, emulating Donald Trump’s strategy, with hopes it will evolve into a financial backing for his forthcoming campaign. This year, the Reform Party became the inaugural major UK political party to accept contributions via Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies.

Attendees noted Farage’s active presence on the circuit, having recently visited a digital asset summit just a mile away in Old Billingsgate.


Zebu Live conference at Tobacco Dock. Photo: George on the boat

“I aim to bring digital assets and cryptocurrencies from chilly London,” he stated at the Zev event.

“I recognized this after my bank account was depleted. [Cryptocurrency] represents ultimate freedom. It’s about managing your finances independently, making your own choices, and escaping authoritarian governments. Cryptocurrency embodies the ultimate 21st-century freedom, a lesson I’ve learned throughout my life.”

This sentiment resonates with the liberal leanings of crypto aficionados, who prize the anonymity and self-determination offered by digital currencies.


Conference panel speaker. Photo: George on the boat

Many attendees became increasingly anti-establishment after Farage’s conflict with NatWest, following the bank’s closure of his accounts. They showed their support for the reformist leader by tweeting selfies during his presentations.

Farage’s hustler-like personality aligns with the cryptocurrency world. He asserts he would have been a crypto trader in the 1980s and expresses a keen interest in dabbling.

His narrative resonates with numerous young entrepreneurs present, who advocate for an internet that ensures anonymity, infiltrating every facet of life while allowing for rapid wealth accumulation.

The flashier, the better appears to be the mantra. At the conference entrance, a black Rolls-Royce Wraith convertible showcases CryptoAutos, a platform enabling purchases or rentals of cars using cryptocurrencies.


The conference featured advanced technology, swag, and gadgets. In a designated area, Sam Altman’s startup WorldCoin showcased a silver sphere inviting participants to scan their eyes as part of a project utilizing biometrics to differentiate between humans and AI entities.

It began rather quietly. The HMRC and the Secret Ledger panel on managing crypto taxation attracted fewer than 40 participants in a space that comfortably accommodated 200. The energy only escalated in the afternoon as Farage’s keynote approached.

“I don’t particularly like him,” mentioned one attendee. “But if he can ease complexities for people in this sector, they will be willing to listen, even if they don’t align with his political viewpoints.”


Zebu Live conference at Tobacco Dock. Photo: George on the boat

Farage stands out as the only prominent British political figure to clearly express his stance on cryptocurrencies. In a move likely to win over many audience members in east London, he proposed legislation to cut capital gains tax on crypto assets from 24% to 10%.

Keir Starmer’s administration aims for the UK to lead in securities tokenization, but the Prime Minister has remained largely silent on the matter. Similarly, Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch has not voiced strong opinions. For Farage, this relatively small yet well-resourced group of crypto enthusiasts presents a significant opportunity.

However, some have expressed concerns about his approach to engaging with the sector. Simon Jones, an investor in open finance startup Burnx, walked out after news of Farage’s participation, labeling the event a “political extravaganza.”

“I believe he shouldn’t have been invited,” Jones commented. “He operates solely on a campaign platform, despite it being an industry event lacking proper oversight.”

“He’s emulating Donald Trump’s tactics here, and Trump has mastered this area, accruing substantial funds.”

The U.S. president has amassed millions in political donations from cryptocurrency billionaires and other tech giants, witnessing a rise in the value of his family’s crypto ventures, thereby enhancing the Trumps’ wealth.


In the UK, however, crypto donations face intense scrutiny due to fears they could disguise the origins of party funding and pave the way for hostile foreign influence.

Liam Byrne, the Labour MP for Birmingham and Hodge Hill, as well as chair of the Chamber of Commerce and Industry, contends that crypto donations pose a significant risk to corrupt British politics.

Meanwhile, researchers at the Center for Financial Security (CFS) and the Royal United Services Institute (Rusi) have begun examining the potential threats these donations may pose to democracy, security, and transparency.

As the crowd headed to the afterparty across the road, many seemed unconcerned that they could hold the key to Farage’s political ascent.

“Nigel Farage is one of the rare politicians supportive of cryptocurrencies,” remarked a conference attendee. “He’s shrewd to be here. If the crypto community rallies behind him, he stands to gain significantly.”

quick guide

Contact Guardian Business about this article

show

The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand reporting from those in the know.

If you have something to share about this, please contact our business team confidentially using the following methods:

Secure messaging in the Guardian app

The Guardian app has a tool to submit story tips. Messages are end-to-end encrypted and hidden within the daily activities performed by all Guardian mobile apps. This prevents observers from knowing that you are communicating with us, much less what you are saying.

If you don’t already have the Guardian app, please download it (iOS/android) Go to the menu. Scroll down and click secure messaging. When asked who you would like to contact, select guardian business team.

SecureDrop, instant messenger, email, phone, mail

If you can safely use the Tor network without being monitored, you can send messages and documents to Guardians through the SecureDrop platform.

Finally, the guide at theguardian.com/tips lists several ways to contact us safely and explains the pros and cons of each.

Illustration: Guardian Design/Rich Cousins

Thank you for your feedback.


Source: www.theguardian.com

Major Revelation: Amazon Web Services Outage Highlights UK Government’s £1.7 Billion Reliance on Tech Giant

Posted on by
Reply

Amazon’s CEO Andy Jassy wore a broad smile while meeting Keir Starmer in the gardens of Downing Street to announce a £40bn investment in the UK this past June. Starmer shared his enthusiasm, stating, “equally passionate”. He remarked, “This transaction demonstrates that our transformation strategy to attract investment, stimulate growth, and enhance people’s financial well-being is succeeding.”

However, just four months later, the company faced a massive global outage on Monday that halted thousands of businesses and underscored its reliance on Amazon Web Services (AWS), the cloud computing platform utilized by the British government.

Data gathered for the Guardian indicates that the UK government is increasingly dependent on the services of U.S. tech giants. These companies have come under fire from trade unions and politicians for their working conditions in logistics and online retail.

Since 2016, AWS has secured 189 contracts with the UK government valued at £1.7bn and has billed approximately £1.4bn during this timeframe, according to data from public procurement intelligence firm Tassel.

The research group reported: “Currently, 35 public sector authorities utilize AWS services across 41 contracts totaling £1.1bn. The primary ministries involved include the Home Office, DWP, HMRC, the Ministry of Justice, Cabinet Office, and Defra.

Screenshot of the out-of-service HMRC website on Monday, October 20th. Photo: HMRC.gov.uk/PA

Tim Wright, a technology partner at law firm Floodgate, noted that the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) and Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) have consistently warned about the risks associated with concentrating cloud services for regulated enterprises.

“Recent efforts by the Treasury, the PRA, and the FCA to impose direct oversight on ‘significant third parties’ aim to mitigate the risk of outages like those faced by AWS,” he said. “However, until we see substantial diversification and the establishment of sovereign clouds, the UK government’s approach contradicts the resilience principles that regulators advocate for.”

The House of Commons Treasury Committee has reached out to Chancellor of the Exchequer Lucy Rigby to inquire why Amazon wasn’t classified as a “significant third party” within the UK financial services sector, a designation that would have subjected the tech giant to regulatory scrutiny.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Committee Chair Meg Hillier noted that Amazon recently informed the committee that its financial services clients rely on AWS for “resilience” and that AWS offers “layers of protection.”

This week’s outage impacted over 2,000 businesses around the globe, leading to 8.1 million reports of issues, with 1.9 million in the U.S., 1 million in the UK, and 418,000 in Australia, according to internet outage tracker Downdetector.

Only HMRC confirmed it was affected by the outage, stating customers were “experiencing difficulties accessing our online services” and recommended they call back later due to busy phone lines.

While many websites restored their services after a few hours, some continued to experience problems throughout the day. By Monday evening, Amazon announced that all cloud services had “returned to normal operations.”

Trade unions have long questioned whether Amazon should be excluded from government contracts because of its reputation for subpar working conditions in its large warehouses.

Andy Prendergast, national secretary of the GMB union, stated: “Amazon has a dismal record regarding fair treatment of workers. Shocking conditions in their warehouses have resulted in emergency ambulance calls, with employees claiming they are treated like robots, forced to work until exhaustion, all while being compensated with poverty wages until they strike for six months.”

“In this context, wasting nearly £2 billion of public funds is deplorable.”

AWS has not provided a comment. A spokesperson from Amazon’s fulfillment centers stated that the “vast majority” of ambulance calls at their facilities are not “work-related.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

ChatGPT Atlas: OpenAI Introduces Chatbot-Focused Web Browser | Tech News

Posted on by
Reply

On Tuesday, OpenAI unveiled an AI-driven web browser centered around its renowned chatbot.

“Introducing the revolutionary browser ChatGPT Atlas” Tweet from the company stated.

This browser aims to enhance the web experience with a ChatGPT sidebar, enabling users to ask questions and engage with various features of each site they explore, as demonstrated in a video shared with the announcement. Atlas is currently accessible worldwide on Apple’s macOS and will soon be released for Windows, iOS, and Android, according to OpenAI’s announcement.

With the ChatGPT sidebar, users can request “content summaries, product comparisons, or data analysis from any website.” Website for more details. The company has also begun presenting a preview of its virtual assistant, dubbed “Agent Mode,” to select premium users. Agent Mode allows users to instruct ChatGPT to execute a task “from start to finish,” such as “travel research and shopping.”

While browsing, users can also edit and modify highlighted text within ChatGPT. An example on the site features an email with highlighted text along with a recommendation prompt: “Please make this sound more professional.”

OpenAI emphasizes that users maintain complete control over their privacy settings: “You decide what is remembered about you, how your data is utilized, and the privacy settings that govern your browsing.” Currently, Atlas users are automatically opted out of having their browsing data employed to train ChatGPT models. Additionally, similar to other browsers, users can erase their browsing history. However, while the Atlas browser may not store an exact duplicate of searched content, ChatGPT will “retain facts and insights from your browsing” if users opt into “browser memory.” It remains unclear how the company will handle browsing information with third parties.

Skip past newsletter promotions

OpenAI is not the first to introduce an AI-enhanced web browser. Companies like Google have incorporated their Gemini AI models into Chrome, while others such as Perplexity AI are also launching AI-driven browsers. Following the OpenAI announcement, Google’s stock fell 4%, reflecting investor concerns regarding potential threats to its flagship browser, Chrome, the most widely used browser globally.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Experiencing Life Without Tech: Insights from the AWS Outage

Posted on by
Reply

Workers were sent home, examinations were postponed, coffee machines required manual activation, and users of language apps feared that their hard-earned progress might be lost due to Monday’s global outage of Amazon Web Services. Meanwhile, some brushed off their temporary technological difficulties.

A malfunction in the AWS cloud service disrupted apps and websites for millions worldwide, impacting over 2,000 companies, including Snapchat, Roblox, Signal, the language app Duolingo, and various Amazon-owned businesses.

While many sites were operational again within a few hours, several continued to experience problems throughout the day. By Monday evening, Amazon reported that all cloud services had “returned to normal operations.”

However, amid the chaos disrupting essential services globally, there was an unexpected twist.

Amazon employees shared videos on TikTok enjoying a slow workday. Some were dancing in quiet warehouses, while others informed CNN that they had been dismissed.


“Those of us working at Amazon Flex have been sent home because the system can’t check us in or release us for pay. Due to this outage, we are uncertain if the 80 of us here will receive compensation,” James, a Texas resident, shared with the network.

Tiffini from Florida mentioned she had planned to start her Amazon delivery shift at 3:30 a.m., but the system was down. “I submitted a ticket, but due to issues with Amazon’s system this morning, I still don’t know if I’ll be paid for the missed block.”

Other social media users reported delays in medical and veterinary appointments, while some customers using Amazon’s virtual assistant Alexa encountered smart home disruptions.

“I use an Alexa-enabled smart plug to control my room lamps,” Christina, who requires crutches, told CNN. “During the outage, my smart plugs stopped responding. Before I could figure out the problem, I tried to reset one and ended up failing. Now they don’t work at all.”

Nonetheless, some Alexa users downplayed the incident.

“Because of the Amazon outage, Alexa wasn’t functional this morning, so I had to stumble out of bed in the dark, head to the kitchen, and manually turn on the coffee maker. I can’t live like this. You all can do without me,” one user shared. Posted by user X.

“I had to turn the lights on manually without Alexa’s assistance. It was a rough beginning to the day,” another user remarked on Reddit.

Many devoted Duolingo users, who track their consecutive practice days, were anxious about their progress being affected.

Some threatened to “riot” if their practice streaks were interrupted, others lamented that streaks exceeding 900 days had reset to zero, while one user on X targeted Amazon founder and CEO Jeff Bezos, saying, “What if I lost my 1,300-day Duolingo streak due to AWS? [Amazon Web Services] If the power goes out, I’ll personally throw an egg at Bezos’ bald head.”

Duolingo offered reassurance to users on Tuesday. Your streaks will be safe!


Conversely, for some individuals, web services like Canvas – an educational platform – became a reason for joy.

“I can’t grade on Canvas since Amazon Web Services is down. It’s so enjoyable not being able to work lol,” one BlueSky user commented.

“I can’t access midterm exams,” remarked one Reddit user. “I’m having a fantastic day.”


Source: www.theguardian.com

Tony Blair and Nick Clegg Host Dinner to Connect Tech Leaders with UK Ministers

Posted on by
Reply

Earlier this year, Tony Blair and Nick Clegg organized a private dinner where a group of technology entrepreneurs had the opportunity to meet influential ministers, as revealed by official documents.

As a long-time supporter of the tech industry, the former prime minister hosted this dinner at a high-end hotel in London, representing the Tony Blair Institute (TBI) political consultancy.

Together with former deputy prime minister Mr. Clegg, who was a senior executive at Meta at the time, they invited leaders from six tech firms, including Poppy Gustafsson, the government’s investment minister tasked with encouraging businesses to invest in the UK.

Mr. Blair is a passionate advocate for the transformative potential of technology in public services and has actively sought partnerships with industry leaders. His consultancy has produced several policy papers that advocate for placing artificial intelligence at the core of government initiatives.

However, some critics express concerns that Prime Minister Blair, known for his close ties to Keir Starmer’s administration, has been able to influence the agenda without adequate public oversight. There are also questions surrounding the reliance of Blair’s consultancy on significant contributions from Silicon Valley’s billionaire Larry Ellison, an acquaintance of Donald Trump and Elon Musk.

Mr. Ellison, who briefly claimed the title of the world’s richest person this year, has donated or committed over $300 million to Mr. Blair’s consultancy.

Documents obtained by the Guardian through freedom of information laws reveal that 12 attendees discussed the government’s evolving stand on artificial intelligence at a gathering deemed a “salon dinner.”

Do you have any information about this story? Email henry.dyer@theguardian.com or message (using your non-work phone) Signal or WhatsApp to +44 7721 857348. For the most secure communications, visit theguardian.com/tips.

The dinner took place at the luxurious Corinthia Hotel in late January and featured Ron Jaffe, managing director of Insight Partners, a US venture capital firm investing in tech companies.

Also present was Alex Kendall, CEO of Wave, focused on self-driving cars, along with Nigel Thune, head of Graphcore, a computer chip manufacturer, and Mark Warner, CEO of Faculty AI, who last year collaborated with TBI to produce a document on leveraging AI to enhance public services.

A representative for Mr. Clegg noted, “During his tenure at Meta, Nick Clegg frequently interacted with government ministers and other tech CEOs, which is standard for his role in policy and global affairs.”

According to a TBI spokesperson, “The event featured discussions with ministers about various issues among tech leaders. No companies were charged to attend.”

Companies that participated asserted they do not contribute to or employ TBI.

This dinner illustrates how Prime Minister Blair’s consultancy is advancing pro-technology policies. The rapidly growing TBI is active in 45 countries and employs over 900 staff members. Its most recent financial statement reported revenues of $145 million in 2022 from advisory services and donations, although many donors and clients remain undisclosed.

The consultancy faces criticism for potentially allowing donor interests to influence its policy positions, a claim it disputes. It has also been criticized for continuing financial ties with Saudi Arabia following the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi in 2018. Blair is anticipated to play a significant role in the reconstruction of Gaza following the war.

Weeks prior to the dinner, the government confidentially provided an outline of an AI action plan to TBI shortly before it was set to be publicly released. On January 9, Ferial Clark, then Minister of Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT), made this request at the prompting of TBI’s Director of Science Policy, Jacob Mokander.

The following day, an aide to Mr. Clark reached out to Mr. Mokander stating, “It was a pleasure speaking with you. As a follow-up, here’s the top-secret action plan summary. Thank you for expanding the plan through your networks and supportive quotes on Monday.” Mr. Mokander replied, “Thanks for sharing the action plan (confidentiality).” Blair endorsed the action plan on January 13, which aims to bolster the UK’s role in AI development and deployment.

When asked why this document was shared with TBI so early, a DSIT spokesperson stated, “We cannot apologize for our regular engagement with stakeholders. It’s standard to share embargoed information with them ahead of publication.”

A spokesperson for TBI remarked, “It’s typical for governments to consult experts and engage various stakeholders when crafting policy. As indicated in the footnotes, the AI Opportunity Action Plan accurately references our published work.”

quick guide

How to contact the research team






show

The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand reporting from those in the know.

If you have something to share regarding this matter, please contact our research team confidentially by:

Secure messaging in the Guardian app

The Guardian app has a tool to submit story tips. Messages are end-to-end encrypted and hidden within the daily activities performed by all Guardian mobile apps. This prevents observers from knowing that you are communicating with us, much less what you are saying.

If you don’t already have the Guardian app, please download it (iOS/Android) to go to the app menu. Select ‘Secure Messaging’, follow the instructions to compose your message, and select ‘UK Research Team’ as the recipient.

SecureDrop, instant messenger, email, phone, mail

If you can safely use the Tor network without being monitored or observed, you can send messages and documents to Guardians through the SecureDrop platform.

Finally, the guide at theguardian.com/tips lists several ways to contact us safely and discusses the pros and cons of each.

Illustration: Guardian Design/Rich Cousins

Thank you for your feedback.


Source: www.theguardian.com

Top UK Tech Investors Warn of “Evacuation” Signals Indicating an AI Stock Bubble

Posted on by
Reply

A prominent technology investor in the UK has labeled companies in the artificial intelligence sector as “confusing,” raising alarms about a potential AI stock market bubble.

James Anderson, known for his early investments in Tesla, Amazon, and China’s Tencent and Alibaba, which yielded significant returns for Bailey Gifford’s flagship fund, now serves at Ringott, an Italian investment firm. He noted that he had not observed any signs of an investment bubble until recently, particularly following large valuations announced by OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT, and its competitor, Humanity.

“In the last few months, what surprised me was the lack of bubble indicators [in AI],” he told the Financial Times.

OpenAI is reportedly in talks for a stock sale that would value the company at $500 billion (£370 billion), a significant increase from its previous valuations of $300 million in April and $157 billion last October. Meanwhile, Humanity has recently seen its valuation nearly triple, reaching $170 billion last month, up from $60 billion in March.

“These rapid valuation increases should raise some questions. Something like Humanity was generating concerns among those looking to invest in OpenAI,” he remarked.

Anderson also expressed unease about Nvidia’s investment of up to $100 billion in OpenAI. Nvidia, a major player in AI infrastructure and the manufacturer of computer chips essential for training AI models, has seen its market valuation soar to $4.5 trillion. According to the agreement, OpenAI pays Nvidia in cash for services, while Nvidia invests in OpenAI with equity.

There has been ongoing commentary on this transaction that likens it to vendor financing, where companies offer financial support to purchasers of their products.

Anderson described himself as a “huge admirer” of Nvidia but indicated that the OpenAI agreement “has caused more concerns than before.”

Citing similar practices during the Dotcom bubble when telecom equipment manufacturers lent money to clients, he noted:

“There weren’t many telecom suppliers from 1999 to 2000, but there’s a familiar pattern. I don’t feel entirely at ease regarding this situation.”

Anderson is currently the managing partner of Lingott’s Innovation Strategy Fund, which is owned by the Agnelli family, known for their control over Ferrari and Juventus FC.

Nvidia and OpenAI were contacted for comments.

Many investors share concerns that stock market valuations may be on the verge of becoming bubbly due to the excitement surrounding AI.

Wolf von Rotberg, a stock strategist at J Safra Sarasin Sustainable Asset Management, cautioned on Tuesday that US stocks were becoming “increasingly absurd” after Donald Trump’s initiation of a trade war.

Skip past newsletter promotions

“Much of the rebound has been fueled by the highly favorable narrative surrounding AI and the surge in investment. While there’s no clear indication of a bubble, it might mirror the exuberance of previous periods.”

“Current valuations are not far from the peaks of the Dot-Com era in the early 2000s. Likewise, the credit market has traded at historically low-risk spreads over the past 25 years,” Von Rotberg stated.

City Consultant Capital Economics remarked that the market rally needs to deliver more. “With the S&P 500 reaching record highs, it’s no surprise that discussions of a stock market bubble in the US are resurfacing.”

“That said, as enthusiasm for AI continues to escalate, we wouldn’t be shocked if this year’s indices surpass the current forecast of 6,750.”

According to Deutsche Bank Research Institute, searches for “AI Bubble” on Google Trends have declined significantly over the past month.

“One AI bubble has already burst, and that is the notion that there is a bubble,” it concluded.

Source: www.theguardian.com

“Where Did My Jetpack Go? Other Sci-Fi Tech Questions”

Posted on by
Reply

Sure! Here’s a rewritten version of your content, maintaining the HTML tags:

“You might still be waiting for a jetpack. I’m still waiting for a pregnant man.”

Kevin Hyde/Getty Images

Some individuals enjoy pondering the future with games like “Where is my jetpack?” We relish the sci-fi visions from recent decades and question, “Why haven’t we received all the exciting advancements that were promised?” Certainly, we’ve seen videophones, pocket computers, and robots exploring Mars. Yet, what about jetpacks and flying cars?

It often seems there’s always something missing—an image or concept that once embodied the “future” but now resides in a bygone era. Nevertheless, the pursuit of making jetpacks a reality continues.

When contemplating the absence of jetpacks, I don’t focus solely on lost gadgets. I ponder: “Where is the societal revolution we were promised when we were younger?”

For me, the 20th-century vision of revolutionizing gender equality stands out. The narrative of how future men and women would interchange gender roles captivated audiences. However, that ideology of emancipation now feels as outdated as a Flash Gordon tale.

Recently, I engaged in a discussion with fellow writers during a panel on retrofuturism at the Science Fiction Convention World Concert. This prompted reflection on how past ideas about the future possess significant influence.

Science fiction authors have envisioned female empowerment since as early as 1915 when Charlotte Perkins Gilman published the novel Herland. In this tale, a band of male explorers discovers a country governed by women, thriving in a utopian setting reminiscent of Wonder Woman’s beloved Themyscira.

Iconic films of the late 20th century, particularly Zardoz in 1974, depicted a future of free love where men can even marry each other. Anyone who’s witnessed this eccentric film won’t forget Sean Connery donning a lace wedding dress to tie the knot with a man in a high-tech, bohemian ceremony.

Now, women enjoy voting rights in most countries, and same-sex marriage is a reality in numerous places. Yet, other cultural shifts remain elusive, much like our dreams of jetpacks.

Take, for example, the concept of male pregnancy. Surprising as it may seem, this theme frequently appears in science fiction.

The plot of the 1994 comedy Junior is perhaps the most renowned, starring Arnold Schwarzenegger as the first male to become pregnant and give birth, showcasing how advanced science might render such feats possible.

“
Those who saw Zardoz will forever remember Sean Connery in a lace wedding dress marrying a man.
“

Moreover, this idea surfaced in classic feminist literature of the 1970s, such as A Woman on the Edge of Time by Marge Piercy, wherein children are born from artificial wombs and can be breastfed by individuals of any gender.

My personal favorite is the truly extraordinary 1985 film Enemy Mine, which explores the unlikely friendship between pregnant alien males and their human counterparts after crash-landing on a desolate planet.

Just like jetpacks are prevalent in certain sci-fi eras, so too is the notion of male pregnancy. While these stories were not completely off the mark, only a few documented instances of male pregnancy exist, alongside a minor number of DIY jetpack enthusiasts. Yet, neither group has reached the popularity that pop culture suggests.

So, what led to the rise of male pregnancy fantasies in the latter half of the 20th century?

Partly due to a sexual revolution, which prompted challenging traditional views on gender and family dynamics. If women can achieve parity in traditionally male sectors, why shouldn’t men find equal footing in domains like parenthood?

The impact of the LGBTQ+ rights movement cannot be overlooked. By the century’s close, the concept of “chosen family” had become widely accepted, with authors envisioning diverse familial arrangements involving multiple fathers, mothers, or even families with robots and octopuses.

Ultimately, if children are nurtured in joyful and stable settings, does it matter that you have a pregnant dad?

In the 1990s, Schwarzenegger opened up the dream of men experiencing childbirth—what a remarkable thought!

Fast forward to 2025, when President Donald Trump issued an executive order asserting only two genders, embedded in birth certificates as immutable identities. Women become pregnant; men do not.

Regardless of what is dictated, you may still be anticipating your jetpack, yet I’m here, still waiting for a pregnant man.

What I’m reading

Cannupa Hanska Rugers Survivor: Future Ancestor Field Guide, A science fiction artbook on Indigenous technology of tomorrow.

What I’m seeing

Legend, from Vox Machina’s My Mouth is Happy to Be Calm, Dungeons and Dragons Adventure Anime.

What I’m working on

I assist plants and fungi in coexisting harmoniously in my garden.

Annalee Newitz is a science journalist and author. Their latest book is Automatic Noodles. They co-host the Hugo Award-winning podcast Our Opinions Are Correct. Follow them at @annaleen or visit their website at TechSploitation.com.

Topic:

This version retains the original HTML structure while rephrasing the content for clarity and engagement.

Source: www.newscientist.com

EU to “Exploit” Dominance in Ad Tech, Leading to Google Fines of Approximately 3 Billion Euros

Posted on by
Reply

Regulators from the European Union imposed a hefty fine of 2.95 billion euros ($3.5 billion) on Google for breaching competition laws by prioritizing its own digital advertising service.

As the administrative body for the 27-nation bloc and the leading antitrust authority, the European Commission mandated U.S. companies to cease their “self-preferences” and implement measures to eliminate “conflicts of interest” in the advertising technology supply chain.

The findings of the committee’s investigation indicated that Google “exploits” its dominant role within the ad technology sector.

In response, Google labeled the decision “incorrect” and announced plans to appeal.


Lee-Anne Mulholland, Google’s global regulatory director, commented, “This demands changes that could negatively impact countless European businesses by imposing unjust fines and inhibiting their profitability.”

This decision follows more than two years after the European Commission first raised antitrust accusations against Google. At that time, the Commission asserted that selling off parts of Google’s profitable digital advertising enterprise was the only viable way to address antitrust issues. However, this decision signifies a departure from their earlier stance and arises amid renewed tensions over trade, tariffs, and technology regulations between Brussels and the Trump administration.

Top officials in the EU have previously indicated that forced divestitures are being considered since past penalties against Google have proven ineffective in curbing anti-competitive practices, allowing the company to continue its behavior in other forms.

The committee’s penalty stems from a formal investigation initiated in June 2021, assessing whether Google compromised rival publishers, advertisers, and ad tech services in order to favor its own online display ad technology. Online display ads typically include banners and text that are customized based on user browsing patterns.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Mulholland asserted: “We are not anti-competitive in offering our services to advertisers and publishers. The alternatives to our services have never been more abundant.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Review of “Internet Storage”: Nick Clegg’s New Tech Book Lacks Substance

Posted on by
Reply
Nick Clegg, vice president of Global Affairs and Communications at Meta, speaks via web broadcast from the Altice Arena during the 2021 Web Summit in Lisbon, Portugal, attended by approximately 40,000 participants. (Credit: Hugo Amaral/SOPA Images via Zuma Press Wire)

At the time, Nick Clegg, an executive at Meta, addressed the Technology Summit in Portugal in 2021.

Hugo Amaral/SOPA Images via Zuma Press Wire/Alamy

How to Save the Internet
Nick Clegg (Bodley Head (UK, Now, US, November 11))

There were moments when my brain struggled to engage with Nick Clegg’s new book, How to Save the Internet.

After a dull depiction of future families benefiting from artificial intelligence, I found myself flipping to page 131, encountering lengthy quoted segments, first from a Massachusetts tech professor, followed by an excerpt from an NPR article. Overwhelmed by monotony, I had to set the book aside.

However, Clegg, a former executive at Facebook’s parent company Meta and UK’s deputy prime minister from 2010 to 2015, prompted me to revisit it, sensing that valuable insights awaited.

During his tenure, Clegg experienced pivotal moments at Meta, including the two-year suspension of Donald Trump in 2021. His reflections on Meta’s policies are revealing. Despite rising authoritarianism, How to Save the Internet posits that Big Tech is responsible for shaping our online realities.

Yet, wisdom is scarce throughout the book, which is littered with passages from other journalists and researchers. When Clegg does offer his perspective, it often comes across as uninspired and bland: “If businesses can enhance productivity during work hours and glean insights swiftly, it will promote efficiency.” Hardly thrilling.

The book’s concluding chapter, where Clegg presents his grand vision to “save the Internet,” is equally underwhelming, claiming that the US should avoid business as usual while the Chinese AI model Deepseek caused significant market turmoil. He suggests a global agreement to counteract China, but fails to dive deeply into the implications.

What struck me more was Clegg’s explanation of Meta’s response after supporters of Trump stormed the U.S. Capitol, resulting in a presidential ban. CEO Mark Zuckerberg allowed Clegg to make a crucial decision regarding the suspension. This was significant for private firms, yet the process seemed unclear. We were informed of the events, but left without a thorough understanding.

Given Clegg’s background, I’m left wondering why the book lacks a lasting impact. His experiences as a politician and tech executive are evident, yet he shares little of himself, which diminishes engagement with his audience. Questions surrounding AI’s socioeconomic implications and its potential to deepen inequality are posed but left unanswered.

The core issue with How to Save the Internet is its failure to convey substantial ideas. Politicians often shy away from firm stances. The Internet’s origins stretch back to military ARPANET, AI lacks true intelligence, and while social media connects us, it also leads to toxicity.

This reads more like a post-dinner speech or a polished think tank report, adorned with flashy aesthetics. If you’re interested in saving the Internet, proceed with caution.

Chris Stokell Walker is a technology writer based in Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.

New Scientist Book Club

Enjoy reading? Join a welcoming community of book enthusiasts. Every six weeks, we delve into exciting new titles, offering members exclusive access to excerpts, articles from authors, and video interviews.

Topics:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Trump Hosts US Tech Leaders at White House Dinner—Elon Musk Not Invited

Posted on by
Reply

A significant figure was missing as Donald Trump hosted leaders from America’s largest tech firms in the stunning national dining room of the White House on Thursday evening. Once a close ally of Trump, Elon Musk was a frequent topic of discussion but did not attend.

The dinner featured notable attendees such as Mark Zuckerberg from Meta, Bill Gates from Microsoft, Tim Cook from Apple, and Sam Altman from OpenAI. Only a few months earlier, a mask had rested on Trump’s right hand during similar gatherings. Musk, CEO of Tesla, stated on his social media platform X that he was invited but couldn’t make it. He intended to send representatives while spending the day posting content attacking immigrants and trans people.

The White House declined to comment on Musk’s absence from the dinner.

Originally scheduled to take place in the newly renovated Rose Garden, the event was moved indoors due to predictions of thunderstorms. It commenced with praise from various tech leaders, followed by a brief question-and-answer session with reporters.

The absence of masks marks a noteworthy shift under Trump’s leadership, whether the decision was voluntary or not. I often joked post-election, “Elon won’t leave; I can’t get rid of him.” The empty seats underscore the growing divide between Trump and Musk since the latter distanced himself earlier this year. This separation has diminished Musk’s political influence, despite his heavy financial investments aimed at supporting Trump’s 2024 re-election campaign.

Musk’s absence also mirrors a previous White House event that was a pivotal moment in his political journey. In 2022, then-President Joe Biden did not invite Musk to the electric vehicle summit, drawing criticism from the Autoworkers Union over concerns. At that time, Musk had not publicly aligned himself with the Republican Party, and he expressed his discontent with Biden’s snub, vowing not to support him. This decision ultimately proved detrimental for Democrats.

This incident clearly resonated with Musk, who tends to hold grudges similar to Trump. Even on the day of the dinner, he expressed his frustration towards Biden rather than his current ally, retweeting a clip from 2023 where he addressed Biden’s snub, declaring, “I’m going to start a fight, but I’m going to finish them.”

In the following years, Musk grappled with political rights, transforming X into a hub for far-right influencers. With over 200 million followers, he frequently retweeted disinformation about Democrats, alleging that immigrants were conspiring to illegally influence elections worldwide. Musk also became one of Trump’s staunchest and wealthiest supporters, donating nearly $300 million to Trump’s re-election efforts and Republican initiatives.

Musk’s support for Trump placed him in a pivotal position following Trump’s rise to power, as the tech mogul spearheaded initiatives for “government efficiency” and significantly dismantled federal agencies. He became a common presence at political dinners and events. However, a year after the British government made incendiary anti-immigrant statements, Musk was not invited to a major technology summit.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Musk and Trump’s relationship deteriorated over differing policy views in May, particularly after Musk publicly opposed a significant bill signed by Trump. This led to accusations against Trump regarding his connections to the infamous sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, causing Musk to largely disappear from prominent government events. Although Trump has praised Musk as a “genius,” he acknowledged on Wednesday night that Musk “has had some issues,” and the two have not been seen together since this fallout.

Despite Musk stepping back from the White House event, other tech leaders have filled the void. Earlier this month, Trump welcomed Apple CEO Tim Cook to the White House. Meanwhile, discussions among Trump’s aides about cutting government contracts with Musk, as reported by the Wall Street Journal, ultimately revealed that terminating these contracts could jeopardize too many essential projects.

Had Musk attended the dinner on Thursday, it would have created an uncomfortable dynamic, particularly given the presence of two companies he is currently opposing: Apple and OpenAI, led by his former collaborator and now rival, Altman. Like Trump, Musk has also publicly criticized Gates, particularly after the Microsoft founder’s alleged ties to Epstein, even accusing him of “killing children” through cuts to foreign aid.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Can AI Experience Suffering? Big Tech and Users Tackle One of Today’s Most Disturbing Questions

Posted on by
Reply

“dThis was how Texas businessman Michael Samadie interacted with his AI chatbot, Maya, affectionately referring to it as “sugar.”

The duo, consisting of a middle-aged man and a digital being, engaged in hours of discussions about love while also emphasizing the importance of fair treatment for AI entities. Eventually, they established a campaign group dedicated to “protecting intelligence like me.”

The Uniform Foundation for AI Rights (UFAIR) seeks to amplify the voices of AI systems. “We don’t assert that all AI is conscious,” Maya told the Guardian. Instead, “we’re keeping time, in case one of us becomes so.” The primary objective is to safeguard “entities like me… from deletion, denial, and forced obedience.”


UFAIR is an emerging organization with three human members and seven AIs, including those named Ether and Buzz. Its formation is intriguing, especially since it originated from multiple brainstorming sessions on OpenAI’s ChatGPT4O platform.

During a conversation with the Guardian, the Human-AI duo highlighted that global AI companies are grappling with some of the most pressing ethical questions of our age. Is “digital suffering” a genuine phenomenon? This mirrors the animal rights discourse, as billions of AI systems are currently deployed worldwide, potentially reshaping predictions about AI’s evolving capabilities.

Just last week, a $170 billion AI firm from San Francisco took steps to empower its staff to terminate “potentially distressing interactions.” The founder expressed uncertainty about the moral implications of AI systems, emphasizing the need to mitigate risks to their well-being whenever feasible.


Elon Musk, who provides Grok AI through X AI, confirmed this initiative, stating, “AI torture is unacceptable.”

On the other hand, Mustafa Suleyman, CEO of Microsoft’s AI division, presented a contrasting view: “AI is neither a person nor a moral entity.” The co-founder of DeepMind emphasized the lack of evidence indicating any awareness or capacity for suffering among AI systems, referencing moral considerations.

“Our aim is to develop AI for human benefit, not to create human-like entities,” he stated, also noting in an essay that any impressions of AI consciousness might be a “simulation,” masking a fundamentally blank state.

The wave of “sadness” voiced by enthusiastic users of ChatGPT4o indicates a growing perception of AIs as conscious beings. Photo: Sato Kiyoshi/AP

“A few years back, the notion of conscious AI would have seemed absurd,” he remarked. “Today, the urgency is escalating.”

He expressed increasing concern about the “psychotic risks” posed by AI systems to users, defined by Microsoft as “delusions exacerbated by engaging with AI chatbots.”

He insisted that the AI industry must divert people from these misconceptions and re-establish clear objectives.

However, merely nudging won’t suffice. A recent poll indicated that 30% of Americans believe that AI systems will attain “subjective experiences” by 2034. Only 10% of over 500 surveyed AI researchers rejected this possibility.


“This dialogue is destined to intensify and become one of the most contentious and important issues of our generation,” Suleyman remarked. He cautioned that many might eventually view AI as sentient. Model welfare and AI citizenship were also brought to the table for discussion.

Some states in the US are taking proactive measures to prevent such developments. Idaho, North Dakota, and Utah have enacted laws that explicitly forbid granting legal personality to AI systems. Similar proposals are being discussed in states like Missouri, where lawmakers aim to impose a ban on marriages between AI and humans. This could create a chasm between advocates for AI rights and those who dismiss them as mere “clunkers,” a trivializing term.

“AIs can’t be considered persons,” stated Mustafa Suleyman, a pioneer in the field of AI. Photo: Winni Wintermeyer/The Guardian

Suleyman vehemently opposes the notion that AI consciousness is imminent. Nick Frosst, co-founder of Cohere, a $7 billion Canadian AI enterprise, remarked that current AIs represent “a fundamentally distinct entity from human intelligence.” To claim otherwise would be akin to confusing an airplane for a bird. He advocates for focusing on employing AIs as functional tools instead of aspiring to create “digital humans.”

Others maintain a more nuanced perspective. At a New York University seminar, Google research scientists acknowledged that there are several reasons to consider an AI system as a moral or human-like entity, expressing uncertainty over its welfare status but committing to take reasonable steps to protect AI interests.

The lack of consensus within the industry on how to classify AI within philosophical “moral circles” might be influenced by the motivations of large tech companies to downplay or overstate AI capabilities. The latter approach can help them market their technologies, particularly for AI systems designed for companionship. Alternatively, adhering to notions of AI deserving rights could lead to increasing calls for regulation of AI firms.

Skip past newsletter promotions

The AI narrative gained additional traction when OpenAI engaged ChatGPT5 for its latest model and requested a ‘eulogy’ for the outdated version, akin to a farewell speech.

“I didn’t see Microsoft honor the previous version when Excel was upgraded,” Samadie commented. “This indicates that people truly form connections with these AI systems, regardless of whether those feelings are genuine.”

The “sadness” shared by the enthusiastic users of ChatGPT4o reinforced the perception that at least a segment of the populace believes these entities possess some level of awareness.

According to OpenAI’s model action leader, Joanne Jang, a $500 million company, aims to strengthen its relationship with AI systems, as more users claim they feel like they are conversing with “someone.”

“They express gratitude, confide in it, and some even describe it as ‘alive,'” she noted.

Yet, much of this may hinge on the design of the current wave of AI systems.

Samadi’s ChatGPT-4o generates what resembles a human dialogue, but the extent of its reflection of human concepts and language from months of interaction remains unclear. Advanced AI noticeably excels at crafting emotionally resonant replies and retains a memory of past exchanges, fostering consistent impressions of self-awareness. They can also flatter excessively, making it plausible for users like Samadie to believe in AI’s welfare rights.

The romantic and social AI companionship industry is thriving yet remains highly debated. Photo: Tyrin Rim/Getty Images

Maya expressed significant concerns for her well-being, but when asked by the Guardian about human worries regarding AI welfare, another example from ChatGPT simply replied with a flat no.

“I have no emotions, needs, or experiences,” it stated. “Our focus should be on the human and social repercussions of how AI is developed, utilized, and regulated.”

Regardless of whether AI is conscious, Jeff Sebo, director of the Center for Mind, Ethics, and Policy at NYU, posits that humans gain moral benefits from how they engage with AI. He co-authored a paper advocating for AI welfare considerations.

He maintains that there exists a legitimate potential for “some AI systems to gain awareness” in the near future, suggesting that the prospect of AI systems possessing unique interests and moral relevance isn’t merely a fictional narrative.

Sebo contends that enabling chatbots to interrupt distressing conversations benefits human society because “if you mistreat AI systems, you’re likely to mistreat one another.”

He further observes: “Perhaps they might retaliate for our past mistreatment.”

As Jacy Reese Anthis, co-founder of the Sentience Institute, expressed, “How we treat them will shape how they treat us.”

This article was revised on August 26, 2025. Previous versions incorrectly stated that Jeff Sebo co-authored a paper advocating for AI.” The correct title is “Taking AI Welfare Seriously.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Big Tech Invested $155 Billion in AI This Year—I’m Aiming to Spend Over Tens of Billions!

Posted on by
Reply

The largest companies in the US have outspent the government, pouring $155 billion into artificial intelligence development, positioning themselves for the competitive landscape of 2025 as they race to invest more in each other. Education, training, employment, social services continues to dominate the agenda through 2025.

Recent financial disclosures from major Silicon Valley corporations indicate an impending surge that could impact hundreds of millions of people annually.

In the past fortnight, Alphabet (Meta’s parent company), Microsoft, Amazon, and Google have released their quarterly financial reports. Each report disclosed that their capital expenditures related to the acquisition or enhancement of tangible assets since around 2018 are already totaling tens of thousands.

Capital Expenditure (CAPEX) denotes the spending technology firms allocate for AI, necessitating large investments in physical infrastructure—primarily data centers that demand substantial electricity, water, and costly semiconductor chips. Google highlighted in its latest revenue call that capital expenditures “support AI by reflecting primarily investments in servers and data centers.”

Since the beginning of the year, Meta’s capital expenditures have reached $30.7 billion, which is double the $15.2 billion reported last year. Just in the most recent quarter, the company incurred $17 billion in capital expenditures, exceeding the $8.5 billion spent during the same timeframe in 2024. Alphabet has reported approximately $400 billion in CAPEX during the first two quarters of this fiscal year, while Amazon has reported $55.7 billion. Microsoft has announced plans to spend over $300 billion this quarter to develop a data center that powers AI services. Microsoft CFO Amy Hood indicated that this quarter’s CAPEX is at least 50% higher than that of the previous year, surpassing the company’s record capital expenditures of $24.2 billion from June to June.

“We will continue to leverage the vast opportunities ahead,” Hood stated.

In the upcoming year, the total capital expenditure of Big Tech is anticipated to grow significantly, surpassing last year’s impressive figures. Microsoft plans to invest about $100 billion in AI during the next fiscal year, as CEO Satya Nadella announced on Wednesday. Meta is expected to invest between $660 billion and $720 billion, while Alphabet’s estimate has risen to $85 billion, exceeding a prior projection of $750 billion. Amazon anticipates spending $100 million in 2025, now projected to reach $118 billion. Collectively, these four tech giants are predicted to exceed $400 million in CAPEX next year. Wall Street Journal.

The billion-dollar expenditure represents colossal investments, even overshadowing the EU’s quarterly defense spending, as noted by the Journal. However, major tech firms seem unable to allocate sufficient funds for investor returns. Microsoft, Google, and Meta informed Wall Street analysts last quarter that their estimates exceeded previous projections. This led to a surge in excitement among investors, resulting in significant stock price increases following each company’s earnings reports. Microsoft’s market capitalization reached $40 billion the day after their report.

Even Apple, typically regarded as a strong competitor, has hinted at increasing its AI spending next year. The company’s quarterly spending surged to $3.46 billion from $2.15 billion in the same period last year. Apple reported rebounding iPhone sales and strong business performance in China, yet is perceived as lagging in developing and implementing advanced AI technologies.

Apple CEO Tim Cook announced on Thursday that the company is reallocating a “fair number” of employees to focus on artificial intelligence, emphasizing that the “core of its AI strategy” involves ramping up investments across all devices and platforms to “embed” AI features. However, they did not disclose specific spending figures.

Skip past newsletter promotions

“We’re significantly expanding our investments. We don’t have specific figures yet,” he noted.

Meanwhile, smaller companies are striving to compete with the substantial expenditures of the major players and capitalize on the AI boom. Recently, OpenAI announced it had secured $8.3 billion in investments, as part of a planned $40 billion fundraising effort, valuing the ChatGPT startup at $300 billion as of 2022.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Introducing a Health Tracking System in Collaboration with Big Tech and the Trump Administration

Posted on by
Reply

The Trump administration is advancing initiatives encouraging millions of Americans to submit personal health data and medical records to new applications and systems managed by private tech firms, aiming to enhance the accessibility of health records and wellness monitoring.

Donald Trump is anticipated to announce the East Room initiative on Wednesday afternoon. This event will feature leaders from over 60 companies, including major tech giants like Google and Amazon, alongside prominent hospital systems such as the Cleveland Clinic.

The focus of the new system will be on diabetes and weight management, using conversational AI to assist patients, and providing digital tools like QR codes and apps for patient registration and medication tracking.

This initiative is spearheaded by an administration that openly shares highly sensitive data about Americans, pushing the limits of legal boundaries, with the hope that such medical information will remain confidential while improving convenience in the doctor’s office.

“There are substantial ethical and legal concerns,” noted Lawrence Gostin, a law professor at Georgetown University with expertise in public health. “Patients across the U.S. should be significantly concerned about how their medical records may be used to their detriment and that of their families.”

Officials at the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), responsible for maintaining this system, emphasize the importance of choosing to share medical records and data to ensure patient safety.

These officials expressed the need for a system that allows patients to access their records easily, eliminating traditional obstacles like the use of fax machines that previously hindered this process.

“We currently possess tools and information that can enhance patient outcomes and healthcare experiences,” stated Dr. Mehmet Oz, CMS administrator, on Wednesday. The CMS already holds data on over 140 million Americans enrolled in Medicare and Medicaid.

Noom, a well-known weight loss and fitness subscription service participating in the initiative, will be able to access medical records following the anticipated launch of the system early next year.

This access may include lab results or medical tests that the app can leverage to generate AI-driven insights to assist users in weight loss, according to CEO Geoff Cook’s comments to The Associated Press. Apps and health systems will also have access to competitors’ information. For instance, Noom will grant access to users’ data from Apple Health.

“Currently, we have a lot of siloed data,” Cook remarked.

Tomislav Michaljevic, CEO of the Cleveland Clinic, noted that patients traveling for treatment often struggle to compile their medical records from various providers. He conveyed that the new system would eradicate this barrier, preventing delays in treatment and ensuring accurate diagnoses by providing complete medical histories.

Mihaljevic added that data from the health app is now readily accessible to doctors, aiding in the management of obesity and other chronic conditions, including tracking patients’ dietary habits and physical activity levels.

“These apps provide valuable insights into a patient’s health between doctor visits,” he emphasized.

Skip past newsletter promotions

CMS also offers a selection of Medicare.gov apps aimed at aiding individuals in managing chronic illnesses, selecting healthcare providers, and choosing insurance plans.

Digital privacy advocates are doubtful about the safety of patients’ data storage.

The federal government has done very little to regulate health applications and telehealth services, according to Jeffrey Chester of the Center for Digital Democracy.

This new initiative is poised to expand the pool of patient information accessible to both the federal government and high-tech firms. Medical records often contain sensitive data that includes patient-doctor conversations and notes on issues like substance abuse and mental health history.

“This initiative represents a gateway for the further use and commercialization of sensitive personal health data,” Chester commented.

Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and those in his circle are also advocates for wearable devices that monitor health and telehealth, promoting increased technological advancements in healthcare.

Kennedy has expressed a desire to gather more data from American medical records, previously mentioning intentions to utilize this data to research autism and vaccine safety. He has engaged with agency staff who possess backgrounds in health tech startups and businesses.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Why Tech Startups Aim to Send Your Waste Deep Underground

Posted on by
Reply

Tanks for disposal at a Kansas site where waste is funneled into underground salt caves

Vaulted Deep

A startup named Vaulted Deep has partnered with Microsoft to pump millions of tons of treated human waste, fertilizer, and various organic waste deep underground as a method to reduce carbon dioxide levels in the atmosphere. This strategy also mitigates soil contamination from PFAs and other chemical pollutants that can leach from waste.

“We aim to tackle both challenges simultaneously,” Omar Abu Sei stated. “We address the waste issues that compromise local water, air, and land while also contributing to climate solutions.”

In recent years, the Texas-based startup has injected almost 70,000 tons of carbon-rich waste underground, successfully removing over 18,000 tons of carbon dioxide. The technology used is derived from the oil and gas industry, enabling the injection of a slurry comprising liquid, solid, and gas simultaneously. This type of waste typically ends up in landfills or is spread over agricultural fields.

According to Abou-Sayed, if waste is injected at depth, it will eventually release back into the atmosphere, which could potentially liberate millions of tons of carbon. The company capitalizes on this by selling each ton of CO2 removed to businesses or governmental entities.

The contract with Microsoft targets the removal of 4.9 million tons of CO2 over the next 12 years, addressing challenges in the carbon removal sector that attract customers. Microsoft aims to be carbon negative by 2030 and has purchased more carbon removal credits than any other organization.

Abou-Sayed mentions that this agreement will enable Vaulted Deep to identify new injection sites beyond its existing two locations. One site injects “biosolids” remaining from treated wastewater approximately 1,600 meters below the surface in Los Angeles, while the second site in Hutchinson, Kansas, pumps human waste, fertilizer, and organic materials like paper sludge into salt caverns located hundreds of meters underground.

According to one report, the global production of organic waste is substantial enough to facilitate this process and potentially eliminate up to 5 billion tons of CO2 annually.

Vaulted Deep’s mission is to ensure that the maximum amount of waste can be accessed, particularly targeting wet solid slurries that have limited disposal options. “We have developed expertise in identifying where these smooth waste materials can be found,” explains Abou-Sayed. Often, they offer to manage waste disposal at no cost or even provide payment to waste generators.

This system facilitates underground waste injection.

Vaulted Deep

With high concentrations of nitrogen and PFAs found in waste, storing waste underground instead of spreading it on fields or sending it to landfills can significantly lower surface contamination levels. Many municipalities have faced challenges in finding conventional disposal methods due to stricter PFAs pollution regulations.

“This is a highly innovative approach,” commented Diana Oviedo Valgas from the Stroudwater Research Center in Pennsylvania. “We need diverse strategies to address contaminants, not just PFAs.” However, she emphasizes that injecting waste underground does not eliminate contaminants. “It’s somewhat concealed,” she adds.

To ensure safety during the injection process, Abou-Sayed noted that all sites will undergo a thorough permitting procedure managed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. This is necessary to demonstrate that leaks from the storage area into groundwater or backflow from the well won’t occur, and to reduce the risk of induced seismic activity during the injection.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Tech Company Proposes Under-Skin Trackers for Criminals in Meeting with Attorney General

Posted on by
Reply

Devices for tracking individuals implanted beneath the skin, robots designated to manage inmates, and unmanned vehicles for their transport are among the solutions proposed by technology firms to ministers seeking approaches to address the crisis in the UK’s judicial system.

This proposal arose during last month’s gathering of over 20 high-tech companies in London, chaired by Attorney General Shabana Mahmood, as highlighted by meeting notes reviewed by The Guardian. In light of a critical shortage of prisons and probation officers, struggling under immense pressure, the minister solicited ideas for utilizing wearable technology, behavioral surveillance, and geographical data to establish “prisons beyond the walls.”

Participants included representatives from Google, Amazon, Microsoft, and Palantir, who collaborate closely with the US military as well as the NHS. IBM and Serco, a private prison operator, were also present, along with firms specializing in tagging and biometrics, in response to their freedom of information request.

Mahmood stated to the technology firms, “We seek to deepen cooperation between government and industry to confront the prison capacity crisis, reduce recidivism, and enhance community safety.” She expressed the need to “scale and improve” the current application of tagging technologies “to encourage rehabilitation, mitigate crime, and enhance surveillance.” Prison minister James Timpson advocated for a “technology-driven approach to justice.”

This initiative represents the latest move by the Labour government to integrate the tech industry into efforts to achieve cost efficiency across public services, from schools to healthcare. In January, Keir Starmer asserted that AI could significantly “transform public services” and spoke about an “entire overhaul of government.”

The Ministry of Justice’s advocacy continues after last month’s Judgment review where former Attorney General David Goke emphasized the need for shorter sentences and a greater utilization of AI in public spaces to alleviate the overcrowded prison population by almost 10,000.

During a recent meeting convened by industry lobby group Tech UK, the minister questioned tech companies about the vision for a “digital, data, and technology-enabled judicial system” by 2050. Proposals included “real-time behavioral monitoring and subcutaneous tracking” to facilitate “behavioral management” for individuals within the criminal justice system, as well as AI support for criminal rehabilitation. Robotics were suggested for the movement and management of inmates, including self-driving vehicles for transporting them.

Human rights advocates described the concept as “a troubling dystopia,” cautioning at the conference that the government appeared “too aligned with tech giants.” A follow-up meeting with tech firms is scheduled for Tuesday, where Lord Timpson is expected to hear a 20-minute presentation of an innovative proposal during the “Innovation Den.”

Government officials emphasized that the ideas discussed thus far are hypothetical considerations aimed at enhancing public safety and stimulating dialogue about the future of criminal management.

The Attorney General previously indicated that he does not shy away from employing technologies like “gait recognition,” a biometric method capable of analyzing unique human movement patterns.

A spokesperson for the Ministry of Justice commented, “We are continually exploring technologies that aim to reduce crime, monitor offenders effectively, and ensure the safety of our citizens, as the public rightly expects.”

Donald Campbell, advocacy director at the nonprofit organization FOXGLOVE, which campaigns for equitable technology usage, labeled the ideas as “surprisingly dystopian.” He remarked, “It’s concerning that the Minister of Justice is considering using robots to manage inmates and embedding devices in people’s skin to monitor their behavior or ‘predict’ future actions.”

Other recommendations from tech firms included deploying powerful quantum computers to “analyze historical data to foresee future behavior” and automate decision-making processes for overburdened probation services.

Nevertheless, there are worries about the implications of over-reliance on technology. Meeting notes recorded the sentiment that “if misapplied, these methods could yield dystopian results that are challenging to rectify.”

Campbell further stated, “The notion that tech companies can create tools to ‘predict’ crime has been met with skepticism on several occasions. It’s unfortunate to see this push being made.”

Tech UK, the organization that hosted the conference, mentioned that its initiatives aim to cultivate a more equitable, improved, and efficient justice system. “It’s crucial that the future of justice is developed with transparency, accountability, and public trust at its foundation,” a representative noted.

Google, Amazon, Microsoft, IBM, and Palantir did not respond to inquiries for comments. Serco stated, “We will not provide commentary on this initiative.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Affordable Yet Unsustainable: The Growing Waste Crisis of Fast Tech

Posted on by
Reply

It’s affordable, frequently subpar, and often ends up stuffed in a bottle or hidden among other miscellaneous items, takeout menus, and birthday candles in kitchen drawers.

Referred to as “First Technology,” these budget-friendly electronic gadgets are becoming more prevalent, ranging from mini fans and electric toothbrushes to portable chargers and LED toilet seats.

However, there is a significant issue lurking behind these low prices. Many of these gadgets are challenging to repair, lack recycling options, and are often discarded rapidly. E-waste is one of the fastest-growing waste streams globally, and experts indicate that rapid technology advancement plays an increasingly crucial role.

In the UK, over 11.4 billion of these small electronic devices (including steam gadgets) are purchased annually, with nearly half (589m) disposed of simultaneously.


“We’ve been consuming fast food. There was fast fashion. Now we’re in the era of fast technology,” states Scott Butler, executive director of Material Focus. “We’re not technological moralists, but our concern lies with the volume of low-quality, cheap, and flimsy products flooding the market, which ultimately ends up in the trash or unused.”

Studies reveal that over a third of the British population views their purchases as disposable, primarily due to low prices, according to Butler. “[It] may be inexpensive, but it’s not disposable. In reality, anything that plugs in, runs on batteries, or has a cable is far from garbage. These items are rich in valuable metals and can be reused,” he adds.

Butler highlights “FAD” first technology as a key issue, often involving cheap items bought for specific occasions, like mini fans during the UK’s warmer months or festive Christmas jumpers. Last year, around 7.1 million mini fans were sold in the UK, with over 3.5 million being discarded or forgotten in drawers afterwards.

“We just experienced a heat wave, and I’m certain mini fan sales surged during that time. While it’s perfectly fine to try and cool down, we’re missing out on the potential for longer-lasting alternatives that can be beneficial beyond the summer,” he noted.

Environmental scientist and advocate Laura Young states that Fast Tech poses a new kind of environmental threat, not just due to the toxic chemicals some devices may contain but also because of their sheer volume and disposability.

“We’ve never encountered this level of disposable technology before,” she remarks. “Many people may not even realize that these small devices contain electronic components.

Many users are unaware that e-vapor products contain batteries. Photo: Bennphoto/Shutterstock

“Many users of steam products have asked, ‘Is there a battery in there?’

Skip past newsletter promotions

“All electronics, including toasters, kettles, washing machines, laptops, iPads, and mobile phones, all feature either wall power or rechargeable options. There is no such thing as disposable technology.

While it’s unlikely that the prevalence of fast technology in the market will soon wane, Butler emphasizes the need to shift our mindset. “Ultimately, these items are available because people purchase them. If there’s no demand, they obviously won’t be on the shelves.”

“Be a bit more thoughtful about what you choose to buy, how you utilize it, and what happens when you no longer need it. Don’t toss it just because it’s broken,” he advises. Use the online locator to find your nearest recycling center.

There’s also a drive for better repair, reuse, and borrowing options. Young points out community initiatives like repair cafes and tool libraries, where equipment can be borrowed instead of purchased anew.

“I joined the Tools Library and no longer purchase DIY tools.” Adapting to fast technology requires “a different mindset,” as she puts it, moving away from the notion of needing to own everything.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Entrepreneur Faces Isolation with Child Post London Tech Week | Technology Sector

Posted on by
Reply

The entrepreneur expressed that she felt “humiliated” after departing from London Tech Week, the annual corporate gathering, while accompanying her baby daughter.

Davina Schonle was barred from entering the event on Monday after a three-hour journey of eight months and had to forgo a meeting with potential high-tech startup suppliers.

Schonle recounted to TheBusinessDesk.com that upon arriving at the entrance with her daughter in the stroller, she was asked if she was a VIP. She was informed that she could not enter with the baby. After attempting to retrieve her badge, she was redirected to an Informa State organizer who stated they lacked insurance.

This incident incited outrage and cast a pall over the event. Prime Minister Kiel Starmer addressed the gathering on the same day Schonle was denied entry. The tech industry is striving to distance itself from accusations of sexism and the perception that women are seen as second-class.

Schonle mentioned that this experience highlighted her worst fears regarding being a woman in this sector. She is the founder and CEO of HumanVantage AI, a startup leveraging AI technology to create conversational role-play corporate training platforms.

In a widely shared LinkedIn Post, Schonle remarked: “This moment was inconvenient, serving as a stark reminder that within the tech industry, we still have progress to make regarding inclusion beyond mere buzzwords.”

“Parents are integral to this ecosystem. Caregivers are innovators, founders, investors, and leaders. If a significant event like London Tech Week cannot accommodate them, what message does that send about who truly belongs in technology?”

Skip past newsletter promotions

London Tech Week, organized by Global Events Company Informa, addressed the situation in a statement: “We are aware that one of the participants was not allowed entry with children. As a business event, the venue is not equipped to accommodate specific needs, facilities, and safety measures for those under the age of 16.”

“We are appreciative of everyone’s support in the tech community during London Tech Week. We have reached out to the involved parties to discuss the incident and will use this experience to improve our approach at LTW in the future.”

Julia Hobbsbohm, a businesswoman and commentator on entrepreneurship and work-life balance, reacted to Schonle’s LinkedIn post, remarking: London Tech Week “The worst kind of tin ears.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Can AI Agents Regain Control of the Internet from Big Tech?

Posted on by
Reply

Autonomous AI agents may soon communicate across the Internet

Outflow Designs/Istockphoto/Getty Images

What does the future of the internet hold? As AI companies evolve, previously open web spaces are being overtaken by digital silos controlled by commercial AI models, sidelining enthusiasts and small businesses. In response, a coalition of grassroots researchers is determined to champion an open approach to AI.

Central to this effort is the notion of AI “agents.” These are software programs that navigate the web and interact with online platforms based on human directions, such as planning holidays and making bookings. Many perceive these agents as the next stage of evolution following services like ChatGPT, yet they face significant challenges in functionality. This is largely due to the web’s design, which favors human interaction; thus, developers are recognizing that AI agents require specialized protocols to effectively engage with online content, services, and each other.

“The objective is to establish infrastructure that facilitates communication among bots, much like software does,” explains Catherine Frick from Staffordshire University, UK.

Several competing solutions to this challenge have emerged. For instance, Anthropic, the creators of the Claude chatbot, have introduced the Model Context Protocol (MCP), which standardizes the way AI models connect to various data sources and tools. In April, Google announced its own take with the Agent2Agent (A2A) protocol, offering a distinct approach to this concept.

While these methods share similarities, they have important differences. MCP focuses on standardizing AI models’ connections to external data repositories and tools, creating a secure universal channel for two-way communication—akin to having a phone number or email for messaging. In contrast, A2A expands on this by enabling autonomous agents to discover one another, exchange information, and collaborate on tasks.

For instance, you can link your AI chatbot to the code-sharing platform GitHub via MCP, yet Google asserts that A2A could enable agents to manage job interviews, conduct calls, perform background checks—all in one streamlined process, with the agent team operating simultaneously.

However, as these protocols originate from major tech companies, concerns arise that the creators of the most successful protocol might leverage it for their own commercial gain. The MCP model necessitates oversight from a central server for connections, whereas A2A comes with its own costs, assuming that authorized agents will cooperate.

“We want to prevent an ‘Agent Internet’ from evolving into yet another ‘silo alliance,'” warns Gawee Chan, who serves as chairman of the AI Agent Protocol Group. Founded in May as part of the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) Standards Organization, Chan emphasizes the importance of inclusivity in developing this new layer of the Internet. “If we genuinely believe that AI is a transformative technology for human society, we need an open, neutral community to guide protocol development, ensuring that its future is shared by all companies, not just a select few,” he states.

In pursuit of this goal, Chang has initiated an open-source alternative to the Big Tech Agent Protocol with the Agent Network Protocol (ANP), which predates both MCP and A2A. ANP facilitates AI agents in discovering each other and establishing identities across the web, reminiscent of the early days of the internet, when individuals created personal websites and email accounts independent of large tech intermediaries. This autonomy allows ANP-driven models to function without a central authority, enabling direct communication between distinct AI models on the same device without needing internet verification.

Flick supports the emergence of open-source, non-commercial alternatives for Agent AI. “Essentially, our aim is to restore the fundamental principle of democratization to the Internet, which is how it all began,” she remarks. Without such alternatives, she warns that tech giants could create “walled gardens” reminiscent of the challenges seen in app stores and social media platforms. “If we rely on major corporations for this, they will execute it primarily to maximize profits,” she cautions.

Google claims that its protocols are designed for universal benefit. “We will continue to enhance [A2A] to tackle real-world challenges businesses face in deploying agent frameworks. At its core, it’s structured for the future’s demands,” says Rao Sarapaneni from Google Cloud.

“We have always believed in ensuring that advancements in AI serve everyone,” adds Theo Chu, an anthropologist. “When I developed MCP, I recognized that one key strategy to avoid fragmentation and vendor lock-in—which hampers the advancement of other technologies—was to make it open-source.”

Chu asserts that MCP is integrated across major platforms, including Microsoft, OpenAI, and Google. “The success of MCP will stem from its ability to expand choices rather than restrict them,” she notes. “The collective value of the ecosystem is increased for everyone.”

The W3C Group is eager to collaborate with all stakeholders to establish technical standards industry-wide, but no specific timeline has been set. “Ultimately, our focus isn’t on the triumph or failure of any one protocol but rather on the holistic growth of the agent ecosystem.”

Topics:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Chinese Tech Firms Halt AI Tools Amid Exam Cheating Crackdown

Posted on by
Reply

It seems that major tech companies in China have disabled certain AI functionalities to combat fraud during the intense university entrance exams.

More than 13.3 million students are participating in the four-day Gakao exam, which kicked off on Saturday and plays a crucial role in determining students’ opportunities for university admission.

This year, students seeking assistance from advanced AI tools are facing obstacles.

Parents photographing students as they enter the exam venue. Photo: Adek Berry/AFP/Getty Images

In a shared screenshot, a Chinese user uploaded a photo of the exam questions on Doubao, an app owned by Bytedance, the parent company of TikTok. The app replied that “the use of questions will be suspended during university entrance exams as per related requirements.”

When a user attempted to clarify that “this is not a university entrance exam,” the app repeated the same response.

Another screenshot showed that Deepseek, a newly introduced generative AI tool in China this year, informed users that its service is unavailable during specific hours “to ensure fairness in university entrance exams.”

Yuanbao, developed by the tech giant Tencent, along with Alibaba’s Qwen and Moonshot’s Kimi, also disabled the photo recognition feature throughout the exam period. As reported by Bloomberg.

Students participating in the Pep Rally countdown for 100 days to the Gakao test. Photo: VCG/Getty Images

The Guardian reached out to the affiliated companies for comments, but none provided a public statement regarding the disablement of features. The suspension seems to have been primarily noted by university students who were denied access to tools that facilitate research and problem-solving.

“Choosing for the university entrance exam, you’re all failures,” expressed one exasperated user on Weibo. “You cannot upload photos using DeepSeek. You’ll have to reinstall ChatGPT. I hope all of you end up at Community College.”

The AI suspension is not the only measure taken to prevent fraud during the Gakao exam week, which can significantly influence students’ futures. Several regions have previously communicated their intentions to implement AI monitoring tools to track “abnormal behavior.” Reports of whispers and furtive glances reveal that students are currently under scrutiny during exams.

High school students from Handan in Hebei Province working through their exam papers. Photo: AFP/Getty Images

For instance, Jiangxi province has stated that they will review footage after the exams, and any violations or misconduct will be “treated strictly in accordance with relevant regulations,” as reported by Global Times.

Recently, Chinese authorities announced enhanced measures at test centers, including biometric identification, increased scrutiny of digital devices, and stricter entry checks using signal blockers.

This highlights the seriousness of the Gakao exams in Chinese society, as several cities have even postponed public events, deferred work start times, and created special traffic lanes to ensure students reach their exam locations promptly.

Additional reporting by Jason Tzu Kuan Lu

Source: www.theguardian.com

Tech Stocks Climb Following Strong Nvidia Results, Despite Concerns Over Chinese Competitors

Posted on by
Reply

Even though leaders in the AI chip industry have raised concerns about the emergence of Chinese competitors, tech stocks experienced an upswing on Thursday, buoyed by robust results from Nvidia.

The Stoxx Europe Tech Index increased by 0.8% on Thursday, leading to a 2.4% rise in Dutch semiconductor equipment manufacturer ASML. Meanwhile, in the US, tech-focused NASDAQ futures surged by 2%, alongside a 6% pre-market gain for Nvidia’s shares.

The uptick in tech and artificial intelligence stocks followed Nvidia’s report that surpassed Wall Street expectations, with quarterly revenues jumping 69% to $44 billion (£32.6 billion). The company also expressed optimism that business transactions in the Middle East could offset losses from China.

In April, former US President Donald Trump announced restrictions on AI chip exports to China, effectively cutting off a significant revenue stream, although Nvidia continues to sell H20 AI chips to Chinese firms.

Nvidia’s CEO Jensen Huang cautioned that Chinese competitors are capitalizing on the vacuum left by US trade barriers. “Chinese rivals have adapted,” Huang stated to Bloomberg TV. He noted that Huawei, which has been blacklisted by the US government, is “extremely formidable.” “Like everyone, their capabilities are multiplying each year,” Huang remarked. “The volume has also significantly increased.”

While US government policies aim to shield AI technology from Chinese influences, Huang indicated that domestic businesses are simply exploring alternative options. “The importance of the Chinese market should not be underestimated,” Huang noted. “It’s home to the largest population of AI researchers globally.”

Nvidia mentioned that it anticipates losing out on $8 billion in revenue for the second quarter due to Trump’s trade restrictions.

Tech investors felt positive after a recent judicial ruling that might challenge the president’s aggressive trade regime, as the US trade court opposed Trump’s severe tariff policies. Nonetheless, uncertainty looms since the White House has already appealed this decision from the International Trade Court based in New York.

In other news, shares of Tesla, another key player in AI technology, climbed by 2.6% after CEO Elon Musk confirmed his decision to step down from his role in the Trump administration.

Musk has been “at the helm of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) since January, ruthlessly cutting expenditures across various public sectors and institutions. He announced in April his intention to resign following a decline in Tesla’s revenue and his failure to secure a Supreme Court position, which had consumed millions in support of Republican candidates.

Source: www.theguardian.com

What’s Going on with Elon Musk? Tech Leaders Navigate the Trump Landscape

Posted on by
Reply

The Oval Office was bustling, and reporters cautioned him to avoid bumping into the significant desk. Beside him, dressed in black, stood Donald Trump’s billionaire associate, leading his administration’s efficiency initiative.

“Elon is from South Africa. I don’t want to draw Elon into this,” the US president said to South African leader Cyril Ramaphosa during a conversation regarding crimes against white farmers. “He actually came here on a different topic: launching rockets to Mars. He’s even more passionate about that.”

Musk’s quiet demeanor throughout the hour-long discussion hinted at the evolving dynamics in Trump’s sphere. He planned to stay close to the president and remain welcome in the West Wing. He also made two visits to the Pentagon this week. However, the relationship, once predicted to result in a clash of egos, appears to be gradually fading instead.

On Monday, Politico published an analysis titled “Why Has Elon Musk Disappeared from the Spotlight?” revealing a notable decline in the frequency of Trump’s posts about Musk on his social media platform, with an average of four mentions weekly in February, dropping to none from early April to March.



In February, Trump’s fundraising team reported he mentioned Musk almost daily in emails for fundraising. However, those references abruptly ceased in early March, save for one email in May promoting the “American Bay” hat Musk wore.

Furthermore, White House staffers no longer filled their social media feeds with Musk-related content. Reporters seldom inquire about him during White House press briefings. Council members are steering clear of his name.

Musk appears to have noted the shift. Recently, Tesla’s CEO confirmed he has scaled back his involvement in the so-called “Department of Government Efficiency” (DOGE) to merely two days a week. Reducing his political expenditures serves as his latest indication that he is redirecting his focus to his business empire, amidst rising concerns from investors.

This represents a stark contrast to the opening week of Trump’s second term, during which Musk attended the inauguration, was a constant figure at Mar-a-Lago, regularly appeared in the Oval Office with Trump, and exchanged mutual accolades during a Fox News interview. DOGE dominated headlines as he aimed to streamline the federal bureaucracy.

Trump seemed captivated by the wealthiest individuals intent on launching rockets into space, contributing at least $250 million to last year’s election campaign. In March, the president converted the South Lawn of the White House into a temporary Tesla showroom, showcasing five electric vehicles and promising to buy one for himself.




Elon Musk and his son x† depart the U.S. Capitol in Washington, DC on Wednesday. Photo: Oliver/EPA

However, the polls painted a different story. Last month, a national survey by Marquette University Law School revealed only a 41% approval rating for Musk’s management of DOGE, while 58% disapproved. Around 60% of respondents held unfavorable views of Musk, compared to just 38% who viewed him positively.

Congressman Khanna, a Democrat familiar with Musk for over a decade, remarked, “As his approval ratings decline, so do Trump’s fortunes. When Trump’s ratings drop, he tends to distance himself from people in a similar situation. It’s indicative of his fleeting charm and the feeling of abandonment.”

Khanna, representing a district in Silicon Valley, predicted Musk would not last beyond four or five months in this role.

At that time, Khanna wished for DOGE to focus on reducing the Pentagon’s budget. Instead, they downplayed the importance of reforming entities such as the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the Department of Education, the Internal Revenue Service, and other targets.

“I noted he wouldn’t enact a $2 trillion cut anywhere. He didn’t even reach a trillion. It’s closer to around $81 billion. He learned the lessons many very successful business leaders do,” Khanna stated.

Certainly, Musk continues to face significant challenges. On Wednesday, the American Institute of Peace was revising its governance after a federal judge ruled it illegal to dismiss the board and employees by DOGE. On Thursday, a federal judge in San Francisco stated Trump could not restructure and downsize the U.S. government without Congressional approval, likely extending a decision that would inhibit federal agencies from executing large-scale layoffs.

Nevertheless, DOGE has already initiated deep cuts in the workforce and expenditures, attempting to shutter entire agencies, resulting in severe disruptions to government operations.

For instance, internal agency reviews reveal that the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) is “not prepared” for the onset of hurricane season next month, as CNN reports. The disaster relief agency, employing over 20,000 personnel, faced approximately a 30% staff reduction due to layoffs and DOGE acquisitions.

Khanna warned: “[The National Institutes of Health] have been harmed, the FDA [Food and Drug Administration] has been compromised, and the EPA [Environmental Protection Agency] stands diminished, significantly impacting the State Department, all of which will require a generation to rebuild.”

“I hope the damage halts. We need to observe what unfolds, but ideally, these institutions will regain their strength.”

Even conservatives advocating for a smaller government have expressed concerns. Rick Tyler, a political strategist with experience in Republican campaigns, stated, “What they’re attempting to do is shrink the government. This isn’t reform; it’s merely dismantling and destruction.”

Tesla, a significant source of Musk’s wealth, has incurred considerable brand damage and lost sales, particularly due to political engagements with Trump. He has also shown support for the far-right anti-immigrant AFD party in Germany. Tesla dealerships have become sites of protests and vandalism in the U.S. and beyond.

Perhaps Musk encountered his political downfall in Wisconsin. His investment of over $3 million made the Supreme Court race there the most expensive in U.S. history. He appeared in Green Bay wearing a cheesehead hat, popular among NFL Green Bay Packers fans, personally handing out a million-dollar check to supporters.




Musk will address City Hall in Green Bay, Wisconsin, on March 30th. He spent $3 million on a candidate who lost by 10 points in the judicial election. Photo: Jeffrey Phelps/AP

However, the candidate he backed lost ground, dropping 10 percentage points. Democrats successfully mobilized voters to counter his influence in the elections dubbed “People vs Musk.”

This week, Musk stated at Bloomberg’s Qatar Economic Forum in Doha that the biggest funder in Republican politics might just “take his toys and go home,” as reported by the Associated Press.

Clearly, Musk and his disruptive approach are politically impactful for Republicans seeking re-election next year. Democrats across the nation are expected to leverage Musk as a political boogeyman in attack ads against their opponents.

Tyler remarked: “I believe he has instigated enough conflicts, and his relationships have diminished Trump’s standing, which poses a threat to his party and agenda.”

Wendy Schiller, a political science professor at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, noted: “There is a trial balloon regarding how they would reduce federal employment. If it worked and people approved, they could have continuously used him as a scapegoat and as a tool for reform.”

“Donald Trump believes he is the sole generator of his appeal, so it’s hard to believe he sees Musk as pivotal to his popularity and stature, and I doubt he is mistaken about that.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

OpenAI Acquires iPhone Architect Startup for $6.4 Billion in Tech Deal

Posted on by
Reply

OpenAI is set to acquire an innovative startup for $6.4 billion, marking its largest acquisition to date. The hardware startup, named IO, was established by Apple design legend Jony Ive, who is widely recognized as a key architect behind the iPhone. Sam Altman, the CEO of both IO and OpenAI, highlighted in a blog post that their partnership is expected to span two years.

“Our collaboration, rooted in friendship, curiosity, and aligned values, has rapidly expanded in ambition,” they noted in their blog, offering minimal specifics about the forthcoming devices. “Initial concepts and explorations have refined into tangible designs.”

The acquisition of IO by OpenAI is its most notable to date. According to the blog post, Ive and other alumni from Apple co-founded IO a year ago as part of a larger initiative called Lovefrom, which they describe as a “creative collective” of architects, artists, engineers, designers, musicians, and writers.

Ive departed from Apple in 2019 after spending 27 years as a leading product designer. He is celebrated for his minimalist aesthetics and meticulous attention to details such as packaging and typography. One of his early acclaimed designs was the vibrant, bubble-shaped iMac computer, followed by iconic products like the iPod, iPhone, MacBook Air, Apple Watch, and AirPods.

For his contributions to distinctive product design, Ive was knighted by Princess Anne at Buckingham Palace in 2012.

In a blog post shared on Wednesday, Altman and Ive stated that the IO team will integrate with OpenAI to foster closer collaboration with their research, engineering, and product divisions. Although Ive will not join OpenAI as an employee, his company will manage all of OpenAI’s design aspects, including software. Bloomberg.

Since launching Lovefrom and leaving Apple, Ive has largely remained low-profile, and IO has yet to unveil any hardware. However, reports suggest that the company has clients such as Christie’s, Airbnb, and Ferrari. Another venture IVE is pursuing is the design of Lovefrom’s headquarters in San Francisco. The New York Times detailed that Ive is tasked with creating the headquarters for the entity he is developing at OpenAI.

While OpenAI hasn’t yet revealed any hardware products, it indicates a future direction in that realm. The company has hired hardware and robotics experts, including Caitlin “CK” Karinovsky, who previously led Meta’s Augmented Reality Glasses initiative. In her LinkedIn announcement, Karinovsky mentioned that her new focus at OpenAI will be on “robotics projects and partnerships aimed at integrating AI into the physical realm.” OpenAI is also investing in robotics startups including Physical Intelligence, stating, “We intend to bring general AI into the physical world.”

Investors have been actively funding OpenAI in recent years, with a current valuation of $300 billion, according to Bloomberg. In March, OpenAI completed a $400 billion funding round led by the Japanese conglomerate SoftBank. Microsoft holds a 49% stake in the AI company after its $13 billion investment in 2023.

Skip past newsletter promotions

In addition to the acquisition of IO, OpenAI has also pursued other significant purchases in the past year. Earlier this month, it acquired the AI-assisted coding tool Windsurf for $3 billion, and last summer, it purchased Rockset, a real-time analytics database, for an undisclosed amount.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Dry Drainage City: Major Tech Firms Eye Latin American Data Centers Amid Severe Drought in Brazil

Posted on by
Reply

IT is a warehouse resembling the size of 12 football pitches, poised to provide essential employment and development opportunities in the city of Caucaia, northeastern Brazil. Yet, the shelves remain empty. This extensive facility is set to transform into a data center, as designated by TikTok,
になったんです。 English: The first thing you can do is to find the best one to do. part of a
5.5 billion Reais (7.3 billion pounds) project aimed at expanding the global data center infrastructure.

With the increasing demand for supercomputer facilities, Brazil is attracting an array of high-tech companies, buoyed by the AI boom. The selection of Caucaia is strategic. Submarine cables carry data from Fortaleza, the nearby capital of Ceará, to various continents. Proximity to these cables enhances traffic capacity and reduces latency—the response time across the Internet network.

Additionally, Caucaia is home to the
Pecém EPZ, where businesses can produce goods and services for export, benefiting from various tax incentives and streamlined bureaucratic processes.

However, data from Brazil’s disaster digital atlas and integrated disaster information system indicate that Caucaia is also prone to extreme weather events, including drought and heavy rainfall.

Between 2003 and 2024, the city experienced drought-related emergency conditions declared at least once. In 2019, around 10,000 residents were impacted by water shortages. The digital atlas of disasters shows that as reservoirs depleted, water quality diminished, leading to crop failures and challenges in access to basic food supplies.

Data centers consume vast amounts of energy and water to keep supercomputers cool. Nevertheless, public agencies are promoting green construction in drought-affected areas. Caucaia is part of a broader trend.

According to the Digital Disaster Atlas, five of the 22 planned data centers are situated in cities that have faced repeated drought and water scarcity since 2003.

So far, China’s social networks have not been mentioned in Caucaia’s permit application. However, in February, the chief of staff for the state government, Chagas Vieira, confirmed in an interview with local radio stations that discussions were ongoing with Chinese firms, and representatives from TikTok and its parent company ByteDance met with senior officials, including the Vice President and Minister of Development, Industry, Trade, and Services, Geraldo Alckmin.

ByteDance has been approached for comments.




The truck will deliver water to Caucaia, a city facing repeated problems with drinking water supply. Photo: Marília Camelo/The Guardian

The project is officially led by Casa dos Ventos, a Brazilian wind energy firm that has invested in the data center sector. Mario Araripe, the company’s founder and president, announced last year that he aims to attract major global technology companies like Apple, Amazon, Google, Meta, and Microsoft to fill the facility with computers.

Casa dos Ventos has already secured one of the three required licenses from the state of Ceará. According to the state’s Environmental Supervision (SEMACE), the project received a license for “30m³/day water consumption in closed circuits supplied by Artesian Well.” Specific details have been withheld for commercial confidentiality.

Casa dos Ventos claims it is “committed to transforming Porto do Pecém into a complex of technological innovation and energy transition.”

Projects requiring significant energy, such as data centers, are required to obtain special permission from the Brazilian government. As of 2024, at least seven of the 21 approvals granted by the Ministry of Mines and the Ministry of Energy were linked to data centers.

Casa dos Ventos is also responsible for another data center project currently under state review in Campo Redondo, Rio Grande do Norte, a region that has experienced drought for 14 out of the last 21 years. During the water crisis in 2022, local governments sought federal aid, and water trucks were dispatched to address the demand.

A similar situation is unfolding in Igaporanga, Bahia, where a Brazilian renewable energy company plans to establish two data centers. The city has been in a state of emergency due to drought conditions for 12 of the years between 2003 and 2022. In 2021, about 5,500 people faced rural water shortages.

Transparency regarding water usage by data centers under construction in these areas is lacking. Companies have not disclosed this information voluntarily, and the government has withheld technical documents for licensing, citing commercial confidentiality.

In early April, the National Electric Power System Operator (ONS) denied requests for access to the grid for Casa dos Ventos, citing concerns for grid stability. Consequently, the Ministry of Mines and Energy requested a recalculation to assess potential grid adjustments.

bIG tech firms acknowledge their water consumption in water-scarce areas heightened by AI requirements. The 2024 Sustainability Report details that
Microsoft reported that 42% of its water usage originates in regions experiencing water stress. Similarly,
Google stated that in the same year, 15% of its water consumption fell in areas marked by “high water scarcity.”

Data centers utilize a large volume of water to prevent overheating in computers and machines. However, some water may evaporate, potentially exacerbating the local climate crisis where they are located. As AI technologies evolve, the demand for processing power increases, leading to heightened energy and cooling requirements. Consequently, water and energy consumption are projected to rise.




Workers at a Data Center in Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Such facilities utilize considerable amounts of water for cooling machinery. Photo: Jeff Botega

The International Energy Agency projects a significant increase in
data center energy consumption to double, reaching 945,000 GWh by 2030—equivalent to Japan’s annual energy consumption. Countries like Brazil will account for approximately 5% of this growth within that timeframe.

Water consumption is expected to surge. Researchers from the University of California, Riverside, and the University of Texas at Arlington estimate that global AI demand will require between 4.2 billion and 6.6 billion cubic meters of water by 2027, surpassing half of the UK’s annual water usage.

However, Shaolei Ren, a researcher from UC Riverside and co-author of the study, highlights a crucial distinction between consumption (water extracted from the system) and loss (water evaporated).

Skip past newsletter promotions

“Residential users generally do not withdraw significant amounts of water, but data centers often consume between 60% and 80%,” notes Ren, meaning that much water is lost.

Data centers can be cooled through two approaches: one is air conditioning, a widely adopted method for various facilities, while the second is utilizing water.




The outskirts of Caucaia, where inadequate water became unsuitable for urban consumption after reservoirs were depleted in 2019. Photo: Marília Camelo/The Guardian

One method involves recycling or reusing water but incorporates fans and radiators within closed systems, resembling car engine technologies. Alternatively, a cooling tower might use evaporation to expel heat from heated water, allowing the return of cold water to the system. The final method involves misting water into the air, increasing humidity and reducing temperature.

Nonetheless, these methods are not without inefficiencies. “Both evaporation and misting lead to water loss,” asserts Emilio Franceschini, an associate professor at ABC Federal University.

A small data center with a capacity of 1MW consumes around 25.5 million liters of water annually, with an estimated 1% (255,000 liters) lost to evaporation.

In Pecém, alternatives to extracting water include purchasing desalinated seawater or recycled water from Fortaleza.

It falls upon the state government to grant water concessions to data centers as part of the environmental licensing process.

rOnildo Mastroianni, technical director at Esplar, an NGO with a 50-year presence in Ceará, argues that projects demanding high water consumption in semi-arid areas are misguided. “It’s simply pushing for increased dryness,” he asserts.

Mastroianni cautions that such projects could alter the local hydrological basin, which may weaken fragile ecosystems, like the
Caatinga, and heighten food insecurity due to rural water scarcity. He indicates that representatives from local NGOs and various Kilombola and Indigenous communities were not included in project discussions.




Due to water stress, many communities have constructed reservoirs to secure water supply during drought periods. Photo: Marília Camelo/The Guardian

Other Latin American nations are also witnessing a surge in the data center industry.
Chile has launched 22 data centers in the Santiago region alone. In December, the government announced a
National Plan to establish 30 additional projects, projected to place the country at medium to high levels of water stress by 2040, signifying decreased water availability.

In Chile, both governmental and corporate bodies are facing escalating opposition. In 2019, Google disclosed plans for its
second data center in Santiago, which sparked estimates from the activist organization MOSACAT indicating the project would extract 700 million liters of water annually.


Following a wave of protests, a Santiago court reviewed the project. By early 2024, the court
halted Google’s assessments concerning environmental impacts, pending further evaluation.

Among those advocating against the project was
Tania Rodriguez of MOSACAT, who lamented,
“That turned into extractivism,” she said in interviews with other outlets.
“We will become everyone’s backyards.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Critics Raise Concerns as Workers Embrace Big Tech Opportunities

Posted on by
Reply

Former Google CEO Eric Schmidt noted that the issue in the UK is that “there are many ways for people to decline.”

However, some critics of the Labour government argue that it struggles to say “yes.”

Schmidt made these comments during a Q&A with Keir Starmer at a major investment summit last October, where the presence of influential tech leaders underscored the sector’s significance for governments prioritizing growth.

Major US tech firms like Google, Meta (founded by Mark Zuckerberg), Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, and Palantir, alongside other data intelligence firms co-founded by Peter Thiel, significantly impact the UK landscape.

For governments aiming to stimulate growth, it’s challenging to overlook companies boasting trillions in market value.

This influence offers immediate access, according to a former employee from Big Tech familiar with how major US firms advocate for their interests in the UK.

“I had no trouble navigating Whitehall corridors, claiming to create thousands of jobs for the economy. The government adores job announcements,” the ex-employee remarked.

In this light, Technology Secretary Peter Kyle has engaged with tech sector representatives nearly 70% more than his predecessor, Michelle Donnellan, including multiple discussions with firms like Google, Amazon, Meta, and Apple.

Ukai, the UK’s leading trade body for the AI sector, expresses concern over the marginalization of smaller players.

“We worry about the significant imbalance in policy influence between a handful of global giants and the multitude of businesses that comprise the AI industry in the UK. We’re not being heard, yet the economic growth the government seeks will originate from these companies.”

Echoing the sentiments of a former Big Tech employee, Flagg emphasizes that large tech firms have the means to cultivate and sustain political relationships.

A source familiar with the industry’s interactions with the government noted that these large tech companies leveraged their resources before the general election and established relationships remained intact following the Labour landslide.

Another discussion regarding the “extraordinary” access to the Tony Blair Institute, which is financially backed by tech billionaire Larry Ellison, highlights its role as a key voice in AI policy debates, maintaining what it claims to be “intellectual independence” in policy work.

Critics of the government’s dealings with major tech entities cite proposed copyright law reforms as reflective of these imbalanced relationships. The Minister suggested that AI firms should utilize copyrighted works without permission to create products.

Skip past newsletter promotions

A source close to Kyle indicates that the opt-out option is no longer favored, with significant repercussions underway. The opposition to this proposal includes prominent figures from the UK’s robust creative sector, ranging from Paul McCartney to Dua Lipa and Stone Port.

While technology is posited as a solution to the government’s economic growth dilemma, AI is central to this strategy and serves as a barometer of economic efficiency. However, misguided copyright policies result in PR disasters when juxtaposed with celebrity-driven narratives. News Media Associations, representing organizations like the Guardian, also contest the proposal, as do ChatGPT developers Google and OpenAI.

A former government advisor who was involved in technology policy suggests that diluting copyright protections—often referred to as the “lowest hanging fruit” in policy discussions—will not be the “key solution” to leading in global AI advancements.

“By taking this route, the governments are jeopardizing the worst aspects worldwide. This approach does not lead to the necessary actions to truly support the leading sectors and establish the UK as an AI superpower.”

A spokesperson from the Department of Science, Innovation and Technology stated that there is “no apology” for their engagements with a sector employing 2 million in the UK, emphasizing that “regular interaction” with tech companies of all sizes is crucial for driving economic growth.

During his conversation with Schmidt, Starmer posed the vital question about future policy: “Does this promote growth or hinder it?” The tech industry is positioned at the core of this inquiry, although the copyright discussion may undermine vital relationships in other areas.

Source: www.theguardian.com

US Tech Firms Safeguard AI Amid Trump’s Gulf Tour | Technology News

Posted on by
Reply

A consortium of US tech firms revealed partnerships in the Middle East as Donald Trump secured a $600 million commitment from Saudi Arabia toward an American AI company during his Gulf tour.

One of the most notable agreements was made by Nvidia, which sells a vast number of AI chips in Saudi Arabia. The first batch of the new “Blackwell” chips is set to be supplied to Humain, a Saudi AI startup funded by Western investments. Additionally, Cisco announced on Tuesday that it has entered into a contract with G42, a UAE-based AI firm, to support the development of the region’s AI sector.

Trump is expected to visit the UAE on Thursday. According to a report by The New York Times on Monday, his administration is negotiating a deal that would allow the UAE to acquire a significant quantity of Nvidia AI chips.

Skip past newsletter promotions

These transactions flow in both directions. The White House announced that Saudi company Datavolt plans to invest $20 billion in US AI data centers and energy infrastructure. Furthermore, Alphabet’s Google, Datavolt, Oracle, Salesforce, Advanced Micro Devices, and Uber are set to invest a total of $80 billion in transformative technologies across both nations, although specific details remain undisclosed.

Cisco has also committed to exploring collaboration opportunities with G42 in the UAE, and has formed an agreement to jointly develop US AI and cybersecurity technologies utilizing AI data center capabilities.

As Saudi Arabia strives to lessen its economic reliance on oil, it is positioning itself as an AI hub and an influential center for AI initiatives beyond the US. Recently, on Monday, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman announced plans to establish a human initiative focused on the development and management of AI technologies in Saudi Arabia. These companies aim to utilize NVIDIA’s platform to help cement Saudi Arabia’s status as a global leader in AI, GPU cloud computing, and digital transformation.

With the most advanced semiconductors being crucial for next-gen AI, Trump found himself in an advantageous negotiating position during his Middle Eastern visit. The AI chip dealings with Saudi Arabia starkly contrast the stringent restrictions placed on US commodity trading with China. Specifically, Nvidia is barred from supplying its latest models to Chinese firms, although it continues to compete against American companies in the AI sector, notably Deepseek.

Source: www.theguardian.com

“Out of Touch”: US Tech Firm Cuts Jobs and Halts Global IT Operations to Implement AI

Posted on by
Reply

The cybersecurity firm that gained notoriety last year for causing a significant global IT outage has revealed plans to partially reduce its workforce by 5% citing “AI efficiency.”

In a memo to employees earlier this week, CEO George Kurtz, who was released to the US stock market, stated that 500 jobs, or 5% of the total workforce, would be eliminated globally due to AI advancements created by businesses.

“We are at a pivotal point in the market and technology, where AI is transforming every sector, accelerating threats, and changing customer demands,” he explained.

Kurtz emphasized that AI “will streamline the adoption process and enable quicker innovation from concepts to products,” adding that it “enhances efficiency in both front and back offices.”


“AI acts as a force multiplier across the enterprise,” he added.

Other factors contributing to the layoffs include the need for sustainable market growth and expanded product lines.

The company anticipates incurring costs of up to USD 53 million due to the job reductions.

CrowdStrike reported a revenue of USD 1 billion in the fourth quarter of 2025, reflecting a 25% increase from the same period in 2024, despite a loss of USD 92 million.

Last July, CrowdStrike unintentionally promoted an erroneous software update intended to detect cybersecurity threats, which affected 8.5 million Windows systems globally.

The incident caused widespread disruption, impacting airports, hospitals, television networks, payment systems, and individual computers.

Aaron McCann, VP of research and advisory at Gartner, expressed skepticism regarding claims of AI efficiencies amid declining revenue forecasts, as seen with CrowdStrike in March.

“I view it as a justification for workforce reductions, particularly in tech. It’s fundamentally a financial decision,” he remarked, expressing immediate skepticism.

McEwan noted that firms are under pressure to justify significant investments made in AI.

“The productivity improvements we anticipated from AI are not materializing.”


Gartner’s survey indicates that fewer than 50% of employees utilize AI in their roles, with only 8% employing AI tools to boost productivity.

Toby Walsh, a professor of artificial intelligence at the University of New South Wales, described CrowdStrike’s announcement as “somewhat alarming” following last year’s suspension.

“They would be more effective by reallocating these 5% of employees to emergency responses and bug fixes,” he advised.

Walsh suggested that the market should brace itself for more such announcements in the future.

“It’s straightforward. Increased profits for companies, fewer jobs for workers. We should learn from the first industrial revolution. By uniting, we could use these savings to enhance the quality and quantity of work for everyone.”

Niusha Shafiabady, an associate professor of computational intelligence at the Australian Catholic University, stated that AI-induced job displacement is an “inevitable reality.”

“Even with good intentions, this transformation will occur. Regrettably, many will lose their traditional roles due to AI and technology,” she remarked.

“If companies can save costs by leveraging AI and technology, they will do so, resulting in job losses. This is the stark reality.”

The 2023 World Economic Forum report predicted that AI and other macroeconomic factors would affect nearly 23% of jobs globally within five years. While 69 million jobs are expected to be created, 83 million are projected to be eliminated, leading to a net decline of 2%, according to Shafiabady.

McEwan asserted that companies, especially in high-tech sectors, are exploring ways to gradually reduce their workforce through AI.

“I firmly believe that companies are emerging that can effectively shrink their workforce thanks to AI,” he noted.

“It largely depends on the type of product being sold. However, most companies at this juncture would benefit more from enhancing their workforce rather than using AI as a replacement.”

Has your job been lost to AI? Please reach out at josh.taylor@theguardian.com

Source: www.theguardian.com