Trolley Problem: The Internet’s Iconic Moral Dilemma Transformed into Video Games | Gaming News

In 1967, British philosopher Philippa Foot unwittingly sparked one of the most enduring memes on the internet. The infamous runaway trolley is racing toward five individuals tied to the tracks. You have the power to pull a lever to redirect the trolley toward another track where a single person is bound. Would you act to save five lives at the cost of one?

What if one of the tracks spiraled into a dramatic loop? Or if the trolley was replaced by a menacing Thomas the Tank Engine? Perhaps the entire dilemma morphed into a commentary on contemporary political debates? The trolley problem, initially posed as a meditation on ethical decision-making, found renewed life in the 2010s as the inspiration for a myriad of absurd, self-referential memes. Now, it appears poised to embark on a third chapter through the surreal interactive comedy game, The Trolley Solution.

Each level serves as a mini-game, ingeniously designed around thought experiments. There’s always a trolley, a lever, an ethical quandary, and a twist that derails expectations. Tracks are dissected into puzzle pieces that players must fit together against the clock. Commuters alongside the rail must maintain their emotional balance and enjoy serotonin boosts from scrolling through social media. One segment flows into a brief visual novel about a Japanese girl who develops feelings for someone on a streetcar that threatens to eliminate her high school rival.

Perfectly tailored for the social media era… trolley solutions. Photo: Bydandans

It’s undeniably absurd, echoing the ludicrous nature of the original trolley problem. “It’s a serious issue presented in an outrageous manner,” explains Baidandan, developer of Solochile. From a Reddit perspective, he puts it succinctly: “It’s a free real estate for shit posts.”

With the foundational joke already well-explored, Baidandan opted to take bold creative risks with the mini-games, striving to transform the dilemma into quirky scenarios that lead to final choices. “Some versions felt too bland and overly complex,” he notes. “Or I couldn’t conceive of a mini-game that adhered to the four guiding principles I established.” These principles state that each mini-game must be engaging, tied to the moral dilemma, introduce unique elements, and subvert expectations.

If all of this seems a bit gimmicky, it’s likely because Trolley Solutions functions best as a comprehensive interactive sketch inspired by a singular joke. Yet, it’s a joke filled with charm and abundant punchlines (each mini-game lasts mere seconds to minutes, and the level selection screen hints at a brief total runtime).

In many aspects, it is perfectly suited to the social media landscape. The humor is designed for the internet, and the quick-fire mini-games are ideal for casual gamers scrolling through TikTok. “I aimed to create something accessible and enjoyable,” Bydandans remarks. “My previous games were often too technical and hardcore for the average player. This time, I wanted to craft something everyone could appreciate.”

“Enjoyment” is a peculiar term when discussing ethical dilemmas. What would Baidandan do if confronted with the original trolley problem? “I would consider options with fewer legal repercussions,” he confides. “I’d call the police, yell for help, and attempt to untie the victims.” Thus, he disregards the constraints of the thought experiment, crafting a more engaging experience instead? That seems to fit the bill.

Trolley Solutions is anticipated to be released on PC this winter

Source: www.theguardian.com

The Dread of Others Without Headphones: A Smartphone Dilemma

In response to an article by Adrian Chiles (where did all the headphones go to public transport? Noise is digging into my soul, April 9), I found myself seated next to a man on a flight who was watching an action movie full of explosions and shooting on his phone without headphones. We had spoken a bit before the flight, so I gathered the courage to ask him what he thought he was doing. I realized that if the conversation went badly, there was no escape.

Regrettably, I remained silent and simmered, filled with wonder and disgust when encountering similar situations on buses or trains. It is imperative that we combat selfishness. Have people forgotten about the impact on others? The thought of confronting these situations fills me with dread, envisioning only a confrontational exchange. In moments of insomnia, I concoct the perfect response that may have resolved the issue that day.

Nick Griesley
Teddington, London

When mobile phones first emerged, handling loud conversations on public transport led me to intervene, providing advice and comments to deter users. An amusing incident occurred on the Docklands Light Railway when I facetiously suggested to my wife (in an imaginary conversation) to “put the dog in the oven.” It brought me some amusement!
Gregory Rose
Oxford

A disturbing incident occurred during my time at Royal Brompton Hospital in London. Despite recovering from a triple heart bypass, the patient next to me used the speakerphone on a phone, disregarding my discomfort. It was left to me to address the issue repeatedly. It is essential for ward nurses to intervene in such situations to maintain patient comfort.
Carol Fuse
Guilford

The issue extends to places where solitude is sought. While meditating atop a summit in Wales, a couple disrupted the peace by playing music loudly on the ridge. There is a pressing need for a broader conversation on the perceived entitlement to impose noise on others, yet who will initiate it?
Nathan Fisher
Chester

The prevalence of loud noise even in public spaces is a concern, particularly with the negative effects of noise-cancelling headphones on hearing loss. I reference a recent Guardian article on this topic (Do noise-cancelling headphones reduce our hearing ability? Some audiologists are beginning to worry about it on February 22nd). I agree with Adrian Chiles that this behavior is incredibly irritating.
Natalie Davis
Pontypool, Monmouthshire

I empathize with Adrian Chiles and others subjected to phone noise without headphones. Personally, I use a Bluetooth hearing aid from the NHS that allows me to stream phone audio directly into my ears. However, I encounter the challenge of ensuring others recognize that I am indeed on a call, and not just someone talking to themselves on the street.
Keith Langton
Kirkcudbright, Dumfries & Galloway

Do you have any opinions regarding the content in today’s Guardian? Please email our letters section for consideration and potential publication.

Source: www.theguardian.com

The authenticity of “Wool Mammoth Mouse” poses a significant ethical dilemma

Colossal Biosciences, a US biotech startup, has announced the birth of what is called the “wool mouse.”

The company says gorgeous hair rodents are living evidence that their mission to restore wool mammoths from extinction within a few years is progressing.

To make mice, scientists have introduced eight simultaneous editing into the genome of experimental mice using modern genetic techniques. These include the addition of genes that make fur grow up to three times longer than usual, as well as other genes that make hair wavy and golden.

Other editing targets target genes associated with fat metabolism, which are thought to help increase mammoth size.

Mice are the result of years of hard work by scientists to reconstruct important parts of the mammoth genome. The last wool mammoth is believed to have died about 3,000 years ago, and scientists are stitching together mammoth DNA, which has been decomposed from relics that range from 35 to 1.2 million years ago.

This is the first time that some of the important genes identified throughout the study have been expressed in living animals.

read more:

Mammoth 2.0

Colossal's ambitious long-term plan is to add many of these mammoth genes to modern elephant embryos to create a mammoth-like hybrid.

Despite claiming to be revived wool mammoth, the original Mammuthus Primigeniuswith all the original genetic complexity and population diversity, it has not been brought back to life. Creatures are more accurately referred to as “cold-resistant elephants.”

Scientists designed a “wool mouse” with the mammoth gene, giving it a very long, wavy golden fur. – Photo Credit: Colossal Biosciences

The Mammoth's return was repeated by various groups and dates back to 2011. The group is generally privately funded, and the exact details of their work are rather opaque.

However, these lifestyle, breathing, and rather cute wool mice show that scientists have made impressive advances in reconstructing some of the key genes that have made mammoths unique. Colossal's Chief Scientist Dr. Beth Shapiro The mouse says it is a “critical step in examining an approach to revive the properties lost to extinction.”

A huge task

There's still a lot to do before you see mammoth-like creatures crossing the tundra or walking through the zoo.

Initially, it is much easier to create gene-edited mice than elephants. Mice have been a staple of genetic experiments for decades and can be quickly raised in a huge number.

Elephants, on the other hand, are rarely used in laboratory experiments, and live mammals happen to have longer gestation periods of over 18 months.

Colossal has made impressive advances by manipulating elephant cells into stem cells.

However, even if Colossal could create a viable elephant mammoth embryo, it would not be able to be used as a large number of surrogates, if any, because both Asian and African elephants are at risk of extinction.

This means that Colossal must develop its own artificial uterus to develop experimental embryos until birth. This has never been done before. Such a system should not only replicate all the complexity of the placenta, but also support calves that are as heavy as Asian elephant calves, exceeding at least 100 kg (220 lbs).

https://c02.purpledshub.com/uploads/sites/41/2025/03/Colossal-mammoth-mice-clip.mp4
Two “wool mice” created by scientists

But perhaps the biggest question remaining is simply, why? Colossal says other similar tasks to revive mammoths and revive dodos and tylacine will lead to biotechnology that will help save other species from environmental changes.

The company claims to stimulate interest and investment so that they can't do anything else, starting with these iconic extinct creatures.

Certainly, the project has attracted a lot of media attention and has attracted more than $200 million (£157 million) of investments that probably wouldn't have made it to a traditional conservation project.

And there are already examples of the technology being used to support species facing extinction today. For example, in Australia, gene editing is used to provide resistance to the poison of cane toads, an invasive species that kill many animals in the region (adorable, endangered marsupials).

In the US, scientists used similar biotechnology to increase the genetic diversity of ferrets with black feet, but it had dipped to a population size that was essentially involved.

More broadly, Colossal's research could help scientists produce eggs, sperm and embryos of a variety of endangered species, including Asian and African elephants, which help to increase numbers.

We can ask questions

But do these lofty ambitions justify? Jurassic Park– Blatant use of genetic engineering? Many people are particularly intelligent social animals like elephants, and feel uneasy about corrections, not to mention a complete overhaul of the genome.

And what is the life of the first artificial wool elephant like? Where do they live and are they introduced to herds and families?

Are they healthy or tired of genetic problems? And shouldn't we focus our efforts on saving habitats and ecosystems, not individual species?

Giant wool mouse showing the properties of an extinct wool mammoth – Photo credit: Giant bioscience

In recent years, genetic engineering has gained greater acceptance among the public, and is generally considered an important way to produce new drugs and disease-resistant crops.

Does the creation of a large, shaggy elephant make people feel that biotechnology is going too far? Or, as a huge hope, will it serve as an inspiring symbol of how technology can save thousands of species that are at risk of extinction each year?

This is a question that biologists, ethicists and biotechnology regulators need to carefully consider the work of scaling up from mice to mammoths.

read more:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

The Ethical Dilemma of AI in Art: Controversial or Innovative? Exploring How Artists are Embracing AI in their Work

CBeloved actor, film star, and refugee advocate Atheé Blanchett stands at the podium addressing the European Parliament: “The future is now,” she says authoritatively. So far, so normal, but then you’re asked, “But where are the sex robots?”

The footage is from an actual speech Blanchett gave in 2023, but the rest is fictional.

Her voice was generated by Australian artist Xanthe Dobie using text-to-speech platform PlayHT for Dobie’s 2024 video work, Future Sex/Love Sounds, which imagines a feminist utopia populated by sex robots and voiced by celebrity clones.

Much has been written about the world-changing potential of large-scale language models (LLMs), including Midjourney and Open AI’s GPT-4. These models are trained on massive amounts of data, generating everything from academic papers, fake news, and “revenge porn.” Music, images, software code.

While supporters praise the technology for speeding up scientific research and eliminating routine administrative tasks, it also presents a wide range of workers, from accountants, lawyers, and teachers to graphic designers, actors, writers, and musicians, with an existential crisis.

As the debate rages, artists like Dobie are beginning to use these very tools to explore the possibilities and precarity of technology itself.

“The technology itself is spreading at a faster rate than the law can keep up with, which creates ethical grey areas,” says Dobie, who uses celebrity internet culture to explore questions of technology and power.

“We see replicas of celebrities all the time, but data on us, the little people of the world, is collected at exactly the same rate… It’s not a question of technology capabilities. [that’s bad]That’s how flawed, stupid, evil people choose to use it.”

Choreographer Alisdair McIndoe is another artist working at the intersection of technology and art: His new work, Plagiary, premieres this week at Melbourne’s Now or Never festival before running in a season at the Sydney Opera House, and uses custom algorithms to generate new choreography for dancers to receive for the first time each night.

Although the AI-generated instructions are specific, each dancer is able to interpret them in their own way, making the resulting performance more like a human-machine collaboration.

In Alisdair McIndoe’s Plagiary at Now or Never festival, dancers respond to AI-generated instructions. Photo: Now or never

Not all artists are fans of technology. Nick Cave, January 2023 Posted a scathing review He called the song ChatGPT generated by imitating his work “nonsense” and a “grotesque mockery of humanity.”

“Songs come from suffering,” he says, “which means they’re based on complex, inner human conflicts of creation. And as far as I know, algorithms don’t have emotions.”

Painter Sam Leach doesn’t agree with Cave’s idea that “creative genius” is an exclusively human trait, but he encounters this kind of “total rejection of technology and everything related to it” frequently.

Skip Newsletter Promotions
Fruit Preservation (2023), directed by Sam Leach. Photo: Albert Zimmermann/Sam Leach

He justifies his use of sources by emphasizing that he spends hours “editing” with a paintbrush to refine the software’s suggestions. He also uses an art critic chatbot to question his ideas.

For Leach, the biggest concern about AI isn’t the technology itself or how it’s being used, but who owns it: “There are very few giant companies that own the biggest models and have incredible power.”

One of the most common concerns about AI is copyright. This is an especially complicated issue for people working in the artistic sector, whose intellectual property is being used to train multi-million dollar models, often without their consent or compensation. For example, last year, it was revealed that 18,000 Australian books had been used in the Book3 dataset without permission or compensation. Booker Prize-winning author Richard Flanagan described this as “the biggest act of copyright theft in history.”

And last week, Australian music rights organization APRA AMCOS Presenting the survey results They found that 82% of members are concerned that AI will reduce their ability to make a living from music.

Source: www.theguardian.com