Tony Blair and Nick Clegg Host Dinner to Connect Tech Leaders with UK Ministers

Earlier this year, Tony Blair and Nick Clegg organized a private dinner where a group of technology entrepreneurs had the opportunity to meet influential ministers, as revealed by official documents.

As a long-time supporter of the tech industry, the former prime minister hosted this dinner at a high-end hotel in London, representing the Tony Blair Institute (TBI) political consultancy.

Together with former deputy prime minister Mr. Clegg, who was a senior executive at Meta at the time, they invited leaders from six tech firms, including Poppy Gustafsson, the government’s investment minister tasked with encouraging businesses to invest in the UK.

Mr. Blair is a passionate advocate for the transformative potential of technology in public services and has actively sought partnerships with industry leaders. His consultancy has produced several policy papers that advocate for placing artificial intelligence at the core of government initiatives.

However, some critics express concerns that Prime Minister Blair, known for his close ties to Keir Starmer’s administration, has been able to influence the agenda without adequate public oversight. There are also questions surrounding the reliance of Blair’s consultancy on significant contributions from Silicon Valley’s billionaire Larry Ellison, an acquaintance of Donald Trump and Elon Musk.

Mr. Ellison, who briefly claimed the title of the world’s richest person this year, has donated or committed over $300 million to Mr. Blair’s consultancy.

Documents obtained by the Guardian through freedom of information laws reveal that 12 attendees discussed the government’s evolving stand on artificial intelligence at a gathering deemed a “salon dinner.”

Do you have any information about this story? Email henry.dyer@theguardian.com or message (using your non-work phone) Signal or WhatsApp to +44 7721 857348. For the most secure communications, visit theguardian.com/tips.

The dinner took place at the luxurious Corinthia Hotel in late January and featured Ron Jaffe, managing director of Insight Partners, a US venture capital firm investing in tech companies.

Also present was Alex Kendall, CEO of Wave, focused on self-driving cars, along with Nigel Thune, head of Graphcore, a computer chip manufacturer, and Mark Warner, CEO of Faculty AI, who last year collaborated with TBI to produce a document on leveraging AI to enhance public services.

A representative for Mr. Clegg noted, “During his tenure at Meta, Nick Clegg frequently interacted with government ministers and other tech CEOs, which is standard for his role in policy and global affairs.”

According to a TBI spokesperson, “The event featured discussions with ministers about various issues among tech leaders. No companies were charged to attend.”

Companies that participated asserted they do not contribute to or employ TBI.

This dinner illustrates how Prime Minister Blair’s consultancy is advancing pro-technology policies. The rapidly growing TBI is active in 45 countries and employs over 900 staff members. Its most recent financial statement reported revenues of $145 million in 2022 from advisory services and donations, although many donors and clients remain undisclosed.

The consultancy faces criticism for potentially allowing donor interests to influence its policy positions, a claim it disputes. It has also been criticized for continuing financial ties with Saudi Arabia following the murder of journalist Jamal Khashoggi in 2018. Blair is anticipated to play a significant role in the reconstruction of Gaza following the war.

Weeks prior to the dinner, the government confidentially provided an outline of an AI action plan to TBI shortly before it was set to be publicly released. On January 9, Ferial Clark, then Minister of Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT), made this request at the prompting of TBI’s Director of Science Policy, Jacob Mokander.

The following day, an aide to Mr. Clark reached out to Mr. Mokander stating, “It was a pleasure speaking with you. As a follow-up, here’s the top-secret action plan summary. Thank you for expanding the plan through your networks and supportive quotes on Monday.” Mr. Mokander replied, “Thanks for sharing the action plan (confidentiality).” Blair endorsed the action plan on January 13, which aims to bolster the UK’s role in AI development and deployment.

When asked why this document was shared with TBI so early, a DSIT spokesperson stated, “We cannot apologize for our regular engagement with stakeholders. It’s standard to share embargoed information with them ahead of publication.”

A spokesperson for TBI remarked, “It’s typical for governments to consult experts and engage various stakeholders when crafting policy. As indicated in the footnotes, the AI Opportunity Action Plan accurately references our published work.”

quick guide

How to contact the research team






show


The best public interest journalism relies on first-hand reporting from those in the know.

If you have something to share regarding this matter, please contact our research team confidentially by:

Secure messaging in the Guardian app

The Guardian app has a tool to submit story tips. Messages are end-to-end encrypted and hidden within the daily activities performed by all Guardian mobile apps. This prevents observers from knowing that you are communicating with us, much less what you are saying.

If you don’t already have the Guardian app, please download it (iOS/Android) to go to the app menu. Select ‘Secure Messaging’, follow the instructions to compose your message, and select ‘UK Research Team’ as the recipient.

SecureDrop, instant messenger, email, phone, mail

If you can safely use the Tor network without being monitored or observed, you can send messages and documents to Guardians through the SecureDrop platform.

Finally, the guide at theguardian.com/tips lists several ways to contact us safely and discusses the pros and cons of each.

Illustration: Guardian Design/Rich Cousins

Thank you for your feedback.


Source: www.theguardian.com

Trump invites top 220 investors to private dinner to discuss his memo coin

Amazing online announcement Called “the most exclusive invitation in the world,” he followed a tour of the White House with President Trump, a “intimate private dinner” at a Virginia member-only golf club.

Seats will be reserved for each of the top 220 investors in Trump, the cryptocurrency he launched the eve of his inauguration.

On Wednesday, the coin’s biggest buyers announced that they will be invited to meet him, in an astonishing escalation of the Trump family’s efforts to profit from Crypto, a website promoting Trump, the president’s so-called memo coin. The effort was effectively an offer of access to the White House in exchange for an investment in one of Trump’s crypto ventures.

“Get dinner with President Trump and the $Trump community!” the invitation said. “Please let the President know how many card coins you own!”

For months, Trump’s foray into the code has created ethical conflicts with almost precedent in presidential history. When he sold digital currency to the public, Trump also appointed regulators that were cutting crypto enforcement, calling for legislation to boost the outlook for the US industry.

As news of dinner invitations spread across social media, Memecoin’s prices have skyrocketed by over 60%, suggesting investors are in a hurry to accumulate enough coins to compete in the dinner table.

“This is really incredible,” said Corey Frayer, who oversaw the Securities and Exchange Commission’s crypto policy during the Biden administration. “They are making their payment agreements explicit.”

Business entities associated with Trump mean that at least on paper earn a personal profit whenever prices rise. Trump and his business partners also collect fees when the coins are traded. This is a windfall that reached around $100 million in the weeks since the coin debuted in January.

Victoria Haenman, a law professor at Clayton University, said the offer raised concerns about the ways Trump and his business could “manipulate to benefit from the presidency.”

Earlier this year, the SEC issued official guidance that MemeCoins, a kind of cryptocurrency based on online jokes and celebrity mascots, is not subject to agency surveillance. Crypto skeptics criticized the policy as a dangerous move that could open the door to ramp-stretched scams by the Memecoin promoter.

As president, Trump has broad immunity from laws governing conflicts of interest. It was pointed out In the past. White House representatives did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Trump’s son Eric declined to comment, helping to run the Trump organization, sponsoring $Trump’s coin.

Once a cryptocurrency skeptical, Trump embraced digital currency on last year’s campaign trail.

In the fall, Trump and his sons, Donald Jr., Eric and Baron, said they were starting World Liberty Financial, a company that offers digital currency called WLFI. So far, $550 million of these coins have been sold. According to the company.

Shortly afterwards, Trump’s social media company Trump Media and Technology Group was to provide crypto-related financial products to amateur investors and announced a partnership with digital trading platform crypto.com.

However, Trump’s Memecoin venture is gaining the most attention.

Just three days before taking office, Trump posted about his social media site Truth Social that he was selling coins. $Trump’s sales quickly surged, and the presidential election became a crypto billionaire on paper.

Memecoin tended to rise and fall quickly, and $Trump’s price quickly became a crater. Traders who accumulated coins suffered cumulative losses of over $2 billion.

The dinner announcement seemed calculated to ignite more interest in the coin.

When $Trump was sold in January, a large stash of coins was assigned to supporters of the project. However, rules built into the offering prevented insiders from selling coins Until last weekincreasing the fear that they’ll try to offload their holdings and lower the price of $Trump even further.

Instead, prices gradually rose a few days before the invitation was announced, and spiked when the announcement was published.

On the Memecoin website, the $Trump promoter set up the leaderboard of Coin’s biggest investors. This essentially allows buyers to track their locations in rankings. Dinner invitations will be sent to “the top 220 Trump owners with an average of $220” between April 23rd and May 12th, the website said. The top 25 buyers will get access to a reception with Trump and a White House VIP tour before dinner. (At this point, the 25th investor on the chart owns around 4,000 coins, worth around $54,000.

“The more you hold a card and the longer you hold it, the higher your rankings.” The website said.

Dinner with Trump is scheduled to take place at Trump National Golf Club on May 22, the website calls it “the most exclusive life invitation.”

Source: www.nytimes.com

Why We Crave Dessert Even After a Full Dinner

You always have room for sweet treats

Marioguti/Istockphoto/Getty Images

Even after eating a large meal, most people still find room for sweets. Currently, mouse studies show that neurons that cause fulfillment are also responsible for sugar cravings. In other words, there appears to be a neurological basis for our love for dessert.

Previous studies have shown that naturally occurring opioids in the brain play an important role in sugar cravings. The main producers of these opioids are neurons located in the brain region that regulates appetite, metabolism and hormones called the arcuate nucleus of the hypothalamus. These cells, known as proopiomeranocortin (POMC) neurons, also control the feeling of fullness after eating.

To understand whether cells play a role in sugar cravings, Henning Fencerau The Max Planck Institute for Metabolism Research in Germany and his colleagues tracked the opioid signals POMC cells send to the brain. They did so by bathing brain slices from three mice with a fluorescent solution that binds to the receptors of these opioids.

The brain regions with the highest density of these receptors were the paraventricular nuclei of the thalamus (PVT), known to regulate breastfeeding and other behaviors. It suggested that sugar craving was associated with communication between these two brain regions – arcuate nuclei and PVT of the hypothalamus.

Therefore, researchers monitored the activity of neurons in these regions when mice were eating regular food. After 90 minutes the animals looked full – they only bite into additional food. At that point, the team gave them a sugar-like butterfly dessert.

On average, neuronal activity between brain regions was nearly quadrupled during the time of dessert, compared to when eating a normal diet. Spikes begin before they start eating sweets, suggesting that this brain pathway determines sugar cravings.

Researchers confirmed this using a technique called optogenetics, which turns cells on and off with light. Inhibiting the signal from POMC neurons to PVTs led to mice consumed 40% less dessert.

“Cell types that are very well known for driving satiety also emit signals that cause sugar appetite, especially when they are full,” says Fencelau. “This would explain why animals-humans over-impose sugar when they actually fill up.”

I don’t know why this pathway evolved in animals. It may be because sugar is more likely to be more energy than other sources such as fat and protein, says Fencelau. So eating dessert is like refilling a gas tank.

He hopes that the study could lead to new treatments for obesity, but he acknowledges that hunger and craving are complicated in everyday life. “There are so many other pathways in the brain that of course you can disable this. We found this pathway, but how it plays with many others. That’s something we don’t know at this point.”

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Unusual Yet Delicious: Creating a Memorable Christmas Dinner with Unique Flavors

Guests enjoy turkey, peanut and chocolate main courses and test ‘flavor bridging’ theory

david stock

Some foods are made for each other. From the comforting combination of mozzarella, tomato, and marjoram on pizza to the enchanting trinity of ginger, garlic, and soy sauce that makes East Asian cuisine so natural, some combinations are so natural that you could live without them. It’s so hard to imagine. But for centuries, gourmets and scholars have been puzzled as to why some foods go together so well.

In 1992, with chef Heston Blumenthal. Francois Benge Let’s go to the laboratory to solve the mystery of this dish. They came up with the idea that foods that taste good together also share many volatile flavor compounds, chemicals that carry aromas that rise to the back of the nose and create flavor perception on the tongue. Their findings were validated in 2011 with the following study: Analyzed 56,498 recipes from various world cuisines.

Yongyeol Ang and his colleagues at Indiana University used that data to build a network model, a complex map that shows the relationships between all the ingredients in a recipe and the flavor compounds they share. This confirms that North American and Western European recipes tend to combine ingredients that share flavor components.

The “Flavor Pairing Theory” has revolutionized the world of cooking. food manufacturer Investing resources to apply that idea to a product, startup companies Leverage open source data on flavor compounds to predict the next big…

Source: www.newscientist.com