Met Chief Dismisses Proposal to Abandon Live Facial Recognition at Notting Hill Carnival

The Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police has reiterated calls during the Notting Hill Carnival this weekend to halt the use of live facial recognition cameras amid concerns about racial bias and ongoing legal disputes.

In a letter, Mark Lowry stated that the technology would be utilized “in a non-discriminatory manner” at Europe’s largest street carnival, employing an algorithm that “is not biased.”

This response came after letters from 11 anti-racist and civil liberty organizations were revealed in The Guardian, urging the Met to discontinue the technology’s use at events honoring African-Caribbean communities.

Among those organizations are Runnymede Trust, Liberty, Big Brother Watch, The Race on the Agenda, and Human Rights Watch. They emphasized in a letter to Rowley on Saturday that such technology would only “increase concerns about state authority and racial misconduct within your forces.”

Critics argue that the police lack a legal framework, allowing them to “self-regulate” their technological practices, which leads to the deployment of biased algorithms affecting ethnic minorities and women.

Last month, the Met announced plans to deploy a specialized camera at the exit of the two-day event in west London. Annually, the carnival attracts over two million attendees, making it the world’s second-largest street festival during the August bank holiday weekend.

In his correspondence with NGOs and charities, Rowley recognized that previous technology deployments at the 2016 and 2017 carnivals failed to foster public trust. The Met’s earlier facial recognition system has since been enhanced, with 102 individuals mistakenly identified as suspects without being arrested.

“We have made significant strides since then. The latest version of the algorithm has undergone substantial improvements with independent testing and validation, achieving a much higher standard,” said Laurie.

He mentioned that the technology would focus on “minority individuals” involved in severe crimes, such as violence and sexual offenses.

Laurie noted that in 2024, there were 349 arrests made at the event for serious offenses including murder, rape, and possession of weapons.

“These crimes pose a threat to those wanting to enjoy the carnival safely. The use of LFRs is part of a broader strategy to identify, disrupt, and prevent threats from minority groups,” he explained.

Civil Liberties Group urged the Met to cease the use of LFR cameras last month following a high court challenge by anti-knife activist Sean Thompson. Thompson, a Black man from the UK, was wrongly identified by LFR technology as a suspect and faced police questioning due to fingerprint misidentification.

Laurie’s letter did not reply to Thompson’s claims but countered the assertion that police operate without a legal framework, noting that the Equality Act 2010 obligates public institutions to eliminate discrimination. He also mentioned that the use of LFR technology is covered under the European Convention on Human Rights and the Data Protection Act.

In response to Laurie’s letter, Rebecca Vincent, interim director of Civil Liberties Group Big Brother Watch, remarked: “Participants in this cultural celebration.”

“Everyone wants to ensure public safety, but transforming the Carnival into a police lineup is not the solution.”

Quick Guide

Please contact us about this story





show


The best public interest journalism relies on direct accounts from knowledgeable individuals.

If you have anything to share regarding this subject, please contact us confidentially using the following methods:

Secure Messages in the Guardian App

The Guardian app offers a feature for sending tips. Messages are encrypted end-to-end and hidden within standard operations of the Guardian mobile app. This ensures observers cannot discern that you are communicating with us.

If you still need the Guardian app, you can download it (iOS/Android) and navigate to the menu. Select Secure Messaging.

SecureDrop, Instant Messenger, Email, Phone, and Post

If you’re able to browse the TOR network securely without being monitored, you can send messages and documents to the Guardian via the SecureDrop platform.

Lastly, our guide at theguardian.com/tips provides various secure contact methods and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each.


Illustration: Guardian Design / Rich Cousins

Thank you for your feedback.


Source: www.theguardian.com

Trump Advocates for Increased Birth Rates but Dismisses Fertility Experts

Every year, tens of thousands of young women opt to freeze their eggs. This procedure can be costly and at times painful, with numbers rising as more Americans delay childbirth.

However, many uncertainties surround the process: What is the optimal donor age for egg freezing? What are the success rates? And importantly, how long can frozen eggs remain viable?

Finding reliable answers to these questions is challenging. During the significant downsizing at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the Trump administration disbanded a federal research team dedicated to collecting and analyzing data from fertility clinics aimed at enhancing outcomes.

According to Aaron Levine, a professor at Georgia Tech’s Jimmy and Rosalyn Carter School of Public Policy, who collaborated with the CDC team on research, the dismissal of the six team members was “a real, serious loss.”

“They held the most extensive data on fertility clinics, focused on ensuring truthfulness in patient advertising,” stated Barbara Collura, CEO of the National Infertility Association.

Collura emphasized that losing the CDC team is a significant blow to both couples facing infertility and women contemplating egg freezing.

These layoffs come amidst rising political interest in declining U.S. fertility rates. President Trump has dubbed himself the “infertile president” and signed an executive order aimed at expanding access to in vitro fertilization.

“The White House is committed to IVF and remains focused on it,” Collura noted.

With one in seven married or unmarried women experiencing infertility, she remarked, “Looking at these statistics, it’s disheartening—and not surprising—that our public health agencies have chosen to sidestep this issue.”

When asked about the team’s elimination, a health and welfare spokesperson commented that the administration is “in the planning stage” of transitioning maternal health programs to a new Healthy America initiative, offering no further details.

The scientists from the National Assisted Reproductive Technology Surveillance System were working to address numerous questions surrounding IVF research.

“We lack comprehensive data on the success rates of egg freezing for personal use because it’s relatively new and tricky to track,” Dr. Levine explained.

This uncertainty weighs heavily on women wishing to have children. Simeonne Bookal, who collaborates with Collura at Resolve, froze her eggs in 2018 while waiting to find the right partner.

She got engaged earlier this year, with her wedding scheduled for next spring. At 38, she expressed that having her eggs banked offers her a “security blanket.”

Though she still has reservations about her chances of conceiving, the frozen eggs provide her some assurance.

The precise success rate of the egg freezing procedure remains ambiguous, as many published studies are based on theoretical models that utilize data from infertile patients or egg donors, which differ significantly from women preserving their eggs for future use.

Some studies provide limited insights, often involving fewer than 1,000 women who thaw their eggs and undergo IVF, according to Dr. Sarah Druckenmiller Cascante, a Clinical Assistant Professor of Obstetrics and Gynecology at Nyu Langone and author of a recent review paper on this topic.

“The available data is scant, and it’s crucial to be transparent with patients about this,” she said.

“I wouldn’t regard it as a guaranteed insurance policy. While it could lead to a baby, it’s more about improving the chances of having a biological child later in life, especially if done at a younger age.”

The CDC team maintained a database known as the National ART Surveillance System, established by Congress in 1992. This tracked success rates for various fertility clinics but now faces an uncertain future without continuous updates.

While the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology offers similar databases to researchers, they are not as comprehensive as the CDC’s since they contain data from approximately 85% of U.S. fertility clinics.

According to Sean Tipton, Chief Advocacy and Policy Officer for the American Association of Reproductive Medicine, no dedicated research team oversees the database.

The surge in women opting to bank their eggs for future use has intensified the scrutiny regarding the risks and benefits of freezing eggs.

This procedure was regarded as non-experimental as of 2012. In 2014, only 6,090 patients opted to bank their eggs for fertility preservation. Fast forward to 2022, and that number soared to 28,207, with 39,269 recorded in 2023, the latest year for which data is available.

Source: www.nytimes.com

China government dismisses allegations of hacking US Treasury | Cybercrime

The Chinese government has responded to allegations linking Chinese government-supported attackers to the recent cyber breach at the U.S. Treasury Department, dismissing the accusations as “baseless.”

The breach was carried out through a third-party cybersecurity service provider, according to a letter from the Treasury to lawmakers. The hackers were able to access keys used by vendors to bypass certain parts of the system.

The Treasury Department confirmed that the incident took place earlier in the month, allowing the attackers to remotely access the workstation and obtain some unclassified documents.

China refuted the claims on Tuesday, stating that it opposes all forms of hacker attacks and especially rejects the propagation of false information for political motives.

Speaking on behalf of the Foreign Ministry, Mao Ning said, “We have consistently refuted these unfounded accusations without supporting evidence.”

The Treasury Department reported the breach to the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency after being informed by the third-party provider and is collaborating with law enforcement to assess the situation.

A department spokesperson stated, “The compromised services have been disabled, and there is no indication that the attackers continued to infiltrate Treasury systems or data.”

In a letter to the Senate Banking Committee leadership, the Treasury Department stated, “Based on available evidence, this incident appears to be the work of a Chinese state-sponsored Advanced Persistent Threat (APT) actor.”

APT refers to a cyber attack where an intruder gains unauthorized access to a target and remains undetected for an extended period.

The ministry did not disclose the extent of the impact of the breach but promised to provide further details in a subsequent report.

“The Treasury Department treats any threat to our nation’s systems and data with utmost seriousness,” the spokesperson emphasized.

Several countries, including the United States, have expressed concerns about Chinese government-supported hacking campaigns targeting their governments, militaries, and enterprises.

While the Chinese government has denied the allegations, it has previously stated that it opposes and cracks down on all forms of cyber attacks.

In September, the U.S. Department of Justice announced the neutralization of a global cyber attack network affecting 200,000 devices, allegedly operated by Chinese government-backed hackers.

In February, U.S. authorities revealed the dismantling of a hacker network called Bolt Typhoon that targeted critical public infrastructure at China’s direction.

In 2023, Microsoft disclosed that China-based hackers had infiltrated email accounts at numerous U.S. government agencies in search of intelligence information.

The hacker group “Storm-0558” breached the email accounts of around 25 organizations and government agencies, including the State Department and Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Meta dismisses employees for using complimentary meal coupons to buy household items

Reports suggest that Mehta, the owner of Facebook and Instagram, terminated approximately 24 employees at the Los Angeles office for misusing $25 meal credits to purchase items like toothpaste, laundry detergent, and wine glasses.

The tech giant, with a market capitalization of £1.2 trillion and ownership of WhatsApp, took action after an investigation revealed unauthorized food deliveries to employees’ homes. One employee allegedly fired was earning $400,000 and admitted to using meal credits for non-food items and groceries.

On Blind, an anonymous platform, the individual wrote about using meal credits only on days they did not eat at the office, leading to their termination upon admission during an HR probe. Some employees were also found to have used credits for personal items like acne pads, with consequences varying based on the severity of the violation.

Free meals have been a common perk at tech companies, including Meta, founded by Mark Zuckerberg, which offers free meals in large offices but provides daily food credits for smaller sites. These credits include $20 for breakfast, $25 for lunch, and $25 for dinner.

Skip past newsletter promotions

In 2022, Meta made changes to its Silicon Valley campus, delaying the free dinner service by 30 minutes to 6:30 p.m. as part of broader cutbacks. This decision sparked discontent among employees as fewer could dine on campus, affecting access to leftover food to take home.

Requests for comment from Meta are pending.

Source: www.theguardian.com