Unlocking the Best Idea of the Century: Why Smartphones Are Here to Stay

Explore science news and lengthy articles by seasoned journalists on our website and in our magazine, covering breakthroughs in science, technology, health, and environmental studies.

“Every so often, a groundbreaking product emerges that reshapes our reality.” Steve Jobs during the 2007 Apple presentation. Tech executives often hype their innovations, but this proclamation was substantiated. The iPhone not only popularized apps but also introduced compact, powerful computers into our daily lives.

However, this transformation comes with drawbacks. Much like a snail retreating into its shell, we can retreat into our devices at any moment, breeding social anxiety. Coupled with safety issues, numerous countries have restricted mobile phone use in educational settings, and Australia has implemented a total ban on social media for users under 16 as of December 2025. Additionally, reliance on a constantly connected device can diminish our sense of privacy, according to data scientists like Mar Hicks of the University of Virginia. “This technology is acclimating users to significantly less privacy, not only in public spaces but also within the privacy of their own homes.”

Smartphones transcend their basic function, emphasizing their role in our lives, as anthropologist Daniel Miller from University College London notes. “They’ve expanded our personal space,” he articulates. These handheld digital environments allow for seamless access to the virtual worlds of our friends and family, resulting in a continuous navigation between our physical and digital existence.

The global influence of smartphones is undeniable. According to GSMA, the mobile operators’ industry association, over 70% of the global population now owns a smartphone. In many low-income countries, people increasingly bypass traditional desktop computers altogether. Smartphone-driven fintech platforms facilitate transactions for 70 million users across 170 countries, removing the necessity for conventional banks. Furthermore, farmers utilize smartphone applications for crop monitoring, and doctors employ them in hospitals to reduce reliance on costly machinery.

Moreover, the ramifications of smartphones extend far beyond their immediate use. The rapid miniaturization of electrical components like cameras, transistors, and motion sensors has enhanced processing power and introduced new potentials. This technological evolution has spurred numerous 21st-century innovations, including versatile drones, smart wearables, virtual reality headsets, and miniature medical implants.

Topics:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Fossil Fuel Emissions Increase Again, While China’s Emissions Stay Steady

Lignite Power Plant in Germany

Patrick Pleul/DPA/Alamy

Global emissions from fossil fuels are projected to rise by 1.1% in 2025, hitting a record high as hydrocarbon consumption accelerates, as per the annual Global Carbon Budget report.

On a more optimistic note, emissions from China, the leading emitter globally, seem to be stabilizing and may have peaked, offering hope that worldwide emissions may soon follow the same trend.

“We are not yet in a situation where emissions are decreasing at the pace required to combat climate change,” states Corinne Le Quéré, a researcher at the University of East Anglia. “However, it is encouraging to see emissions growth in China and India beginning to slow.”

The report estimates that humanity will emit 38.1 billion tonnes of fossil CO2 this year, comparable to the emissions from driving 9 billion gasoline cars annually. While renewable energy sources are replacing hydrocarbons in several regions, they remain insufficient to meet the rising energy demands, most of which continue to be fulfilled by fossil fuels. The consumption of coal, oil, and natural gas is still on the rise this year.

As noted in the report, the Earth is now 1.36 degrees Celsius warmer than before the industrial era. The current emissions trajectory makes it nearly impossible to keep global warming below the 1.5°C threshold set by the Paris Agreement, according to the report’s authors. Exceeding this limit substantially increases the risks of severe climate impacts, including irreversible changes like ice sheet collapses.

Last month, United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres urged world leaders at the COP30 climate summit that surpassing 1.5°C of warming seems likely, urging humanity to reduce emissions and minimize this overshoot.

While global CO2 emissions are expected to decline slightly in 2025 when factoring in carbon absorption by oceans and land ecosystems, this is primarily attributed to the conclusion of the warm El Niño event, which hindered photosynthesis in major carbon sinks like tropical forests.

As the climate continues to warm, these sinks are becoming less effective at absorbing CO2, as highlighted in a separate study conducted by the team behind the Global Carbon Budget Report.

Nonetheless, the overall rise in emissions over the past decade has been slower compared to the previous decade, notes Pierre Friedlingstein from the University of Exeter, one of the report’s authors. “There are positive trends,” he asserts. “When looking at the growth rate, it’s significantly lower now.”

The report projects a 0.4% increase in emissions from China in 2025. An analysis by Carbon Brief illustrates that emissions have remained flat through the third quarter of this year. Solar power generation in the country has surged by 46% year-on-year, which has helped to mitigate the increased electricity demand. Meanwhile, rising electric vehicle sales have contributed to reduced pollution in the transport sector, although a spike in the production of oil-heavy chemicals and plastics has led to an uptick in static electricity emissions overall.

The think tank “Ember” mentions in another report that, thanks to the solar power boom, China’s fossil fuel electricity generation declined by 1.1% in the first three quarters of 2025, indicating “structural changes within the country’s electricity system.” India is also experiencing a significant increase in solar and wind energy installations, which fell by 3.3% during this period.

Enver stated that for the first time since the onset of COVID-19, global fossil electricity generation, excluding transportation, industry, and other sectors, will see no increase in 2025.

Topics:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Introducing the Revenge Quitters: Why Workers are Walking Away and Refusing to Stay Silent

In 2011, Joey Lanev de Francesco spent nearly four years working in room service at a luxury hotel in Providence, Rhode Island, earning a mere $5.50 (£4) per hour. He endured long shifts that took a toll on him and reduced his hard-earned tips.

The inadequate treatment escalated when De Francesco and his coworkers attempted to unionize. The manager responded harshly, punishing employees for minor infractions. In fact, shift workers who needed to call guests were prohibited from sitting down.

De Francesco ultimately decided to resign. On his final day, he secretly entered the hotel staff quarters with a herd of seven powerful marching bands, surprising his boss with a musical farewell. “I’m here to tell you I’m not going,” he proclaimed, exiting while his band played triumphant tunes and chanted “Joey Quits.”

At 22 years old, De Francesco quickly enlisted friends to record the event. After sitting on the video for a few days, he uploaded it to YouTube, where it rapidly gained traction. Fast forward 13 years, and the video has garnered nearly 10 million views.

Brass off… Joey Lanev de Francesco bids farewell to his low-wage hotel job in 2011. Photo: YouTube

“We didn’t think it would gain much attention,” De Francesco, now 36 and living in New York, stated. The musician expressed feeling “liberated” after resigning and turning the tables on his manager. “Now, I’m ashamed of you for treating everyone so poorly,” he remarked.

Did his viral exit hinder his job prospects? Not at all. Shortly thereafter, De Francesco found work at a museum, noting that the incident “will never come up” in job interviews—perhaps even something worth adding to his resume.

De Francesco’s story remains iconic in the Hall of Fame of Resignation, but it faces stiff competition from a new wave of employees. More workers are staging revenge resignations, demonstrating their discontent with their workplaces. Even clergy members are partaking in this trend: In July, Father Pat Brennan delivered a “farewell gift” to his congregation in the form of a poem that doubled as his resignation letter, aiming to be an “uncomplaining, undesirable” parishioner who spread “gossip” using “holy lips.”

A gift for farewell… Father Pat Brennan’s resignation poem. Photo: Facebook

Employer review site Glassdoor warned at the end of last year about a “wave of revenge” shaping the future of employee satisfaction by 2025. A survey of 2,008 workers in the UK released in July revealed that 15% have left their jobs out of revenge. Social media has accelerated this trend, with many sharing their stories online. Brianna’s resignation video concluded with a rallying cry: “These companies will fire you in a day and leave nothing behind.

The 26-year-old American, living in Kyoto, Japan, was just two hours away from teaching his next English class when he quit. Initially, things were manageable, but it quickly changed. “If I finished a lesson a minute early or late, she’d become upset,” Slaughter recounted.

As Slaughter began to work, he found lots of free time, but his coworkers were mostly “cold,” and soon, problems began to arise. They earned 2,000 yen (£10) per class instead of hourly wages, forcing them to endure unpaid hours between classes for minimal compensation. Schedules were often given out just a day before, making planning nearly impossible. Due to the sedentary nature of the job, Slaughter developed health issues: “I went to the doctor, and they said, you’re sitting all the time, so you’re getting inflammation in your neck,” he noted.

Slaughter’s breaking point occurred with the arrival of a new manager, who insisted he wear long sleeves to cover his “aggressive tattoos” and often sat in on classes. It escalated to the point where Slaughter was crying every night. After receiving an unimpressive 100,000 yen (£500) for a month of “Hardcore Classroom Lessons” last May, he had had enough.

“If you want to leave, leave the baby”… Briana Slaughter on TikTok. Photo: TikTok

Slaughter sent his resignation letter into the digital ether before quickly recalling that a two-month notice was required. In a TikTok video that has amassed 1.2 million views, Slaughter addressed his manager:

Far from hindering their careers, these stories have gone viral, unlocking new opportunities. “I made $7,000 on TikTok in the month I left,” Slaughter remarked. Many reached out, expressing that his video inspired them to leave their toxic workplaces: “They said: I think I’ll quit my job too. This was my sign.” For those undecided, Slaughter advised:

Younger generations are more likely to execute revenge resignations. A report revealed that 26% of individuals aged 18-34 and 22% of those aged 35-44 in the UK have done so, compared to just 8% of people aged 45-54. In June, a survey by the Business Research Group found a 15% difference in this regard between younger and older workers in the United States.

Four years ago, 25-year-old Carly, residing in Alabama, was jobless. After contacting a temp agency, she was immediately offered a receptionist position based solely on her resume, with instructions to start the next day. “It might not have been the ideal job, but I was desperate, so I accepted,” she reflected.

The initial three months were “wonderful,” leading to a promotion as the HR pay manager, but things soon took a downturn. A new colleague aligned with the boss began to spread false rumors that Carly was an alcoholic due to her use of a lamp instead of overhead lights in her office. “I liked the ambiance,” she noted.

Carly was soon assigned additional duties as an accounts payable manager. “It was too much for a 21-year-old to handle alone,” she explained. The company briefly hired a man who was paid $10 more per hour than her to assist, but he was fired after mishandling payroll. Carly was forced to juggle both roles once more.

“I was perpetually stressed, distressed, and crying,” she admitted. The situation reached a boiling point during a management meeting when a colleague expected her to “flap frustration” in front of everyone. “It was an absurd request,” she remarked. “He essentially aimed to bully me publicly,” but Carly had different plans.

On the day of the meeting, Carly awoke early, went to the office, and scheduled an email to all managers conveying, “Let them know how messed up their business is,” she stated. It began cautiously: “I decided it was time to pursue a different path,” but quickly escalated. She bluntly labeled one manager as “literally a rock” and mentioned that her heavy workload caused “daily stress that often culminated in anxiety attacks and tearful nights.” She concluded with, “My laptop and keys are on my desk.”

After hitting send, her boss attempted to call; Carly didn’t answer. “I never heard from them again,” she recounted. Upon leaving the office for the last time, she felt euphoric: “I could have stripped my clothes off and raced home naked. All my anxiety and stress melted away,” she claimed.

She quickly secured another job, although she had some reservations about future interviews. “If they ask, I’ll be honest. If you treat me well, I won’t do this to you,” Carly assured.

While most are no longer engaging in dramatic revenge resignations, some new workers may be motivated to share their own experiences. Katie Ostler left her job after two years at a supermarket in Melbourne, Australia, where she began working at 16. “It was a very toxic, high-pressure environment with significant sales,” she explained.

Now 29 and living in Manchester, UK, Ostler wasn’t concerned about her boss knowing her name for the first six months. “It wasn’t ideal, but I kept my head down and did what was required,” she expressed.

As she approached 18, new job opportunities, particularly in bars, opened up. When the toxic supermarket experience pushed her to the edge, she had already submitted her resume to a local pub. One day, a customer angrily yelled at one of Ostler’s 15-year-old colleagues over a refund. Rather than support the young employee, the manager sided with the customer and also shouted. “I decided it was time to leave,” she remarked.

Not long after, she received a bar job offer and went to the supermarket to submit her resignation during the mandatory week’s notice. Attempting to give her letter to the supervisor, she was directed to hand it directly to the manager, who was supposedly in an interview. After following the supervisor’s instructions on location, Ostler seized the opportunity. She delivered the letter and announced her departure. The room fell silent, and the interviewees stared at her in confusion. “It took a lot of courage. I left before my manager could respond,” she said.

That wasn’t the last she would hear from him. She received a call on her way to begin her new job, instructing her not to finish her final week because she “didn’t want my toxic energy” around the team. “I remember thinking, did you look in the mirror?” she recalled. She had to return to the supermarket several times for groceries. “I avoided it when possible, but people recognized me and said hello. Unfortunately, no one cheered for me when I entered,” she said. Nonetheless, the resignation felt empowering: “I felt like a boss. It was a very powerful moment.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Parents, Stay Calm: Achievable Tips for Healthy Screening Times for Kids | Kaitlyn Regehr

this summer, technology secretary Peter Kyle revealed that he is contemplating a two-hour “screen time” limit for children’s use of social media apps. This approach is not just insufficient; it has become outdated.

While the timing of this announcement is appropriate, coinciding with the onset of summer holidays and the imperative for parents to oversee their children’s safety in digital spaces, it is rooted in older screen time recommendations. While it’s vital to think about limiting screen time, the suggested cap only addresses usage duration without considering quality. Thankfully, as someone who teaches digital literacy and is also a parent, I recognize there are ways to cultivate healthier habits for our children this summer, even if the government hasn’t fully adapted yet.

Screen time limits have dominated the discourse on digital engagement for parents, educators, and society over the past decade. This guidance emerged after research indicated that increased screen time correlates with a higher risk of obesity among children and adolescents. While this was beneficial advice for promoting physical health, it failed to robustly address how the nature and quality of online content impact mental health.

For instance, adhering to this guidance allows one child to enjoy CBeebies alongside their family, stimulating conversation, while another child is isolated with headphones, consuming algorithm-driven YouTube Shorts. The existing “Screen Time” guidance treats both scenarios equivalently. However, they are qualitatively distinct. In the first case, one child experiences interactive and communal viewing with a parent, fostering discussion and connection, while the other child’s viewing experience remains isolated and fragmented. They consume short-form content with limited narratives and character development, often lacking regulatory oversight.

YouTube has become a primary platform for our children’s screen time and is now the leading choice for Generation Alpha’s first television experience. Remarkably, 88% of UK children aged 3 to 17 are using the platform. Yet, YouTube is often overlooked in discussions about social media restrictions, including in Kyle’s statement.

Attempts have been made to differentiate between types of screen time, such as “passive” versus “active” engagement. The Royal College of Pediatrics and Child Health aims for policies that emphasize habits and behavior, categorizing “active screen time as involving cognitive or physical engagement—like gaming or homework activities—while passive screen time entails low levels of interaction and intellectual involvement. Similarly, the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry recommends engaging with children about what they watch, fostering opportunities for social, educational, and creative screen time. Unfortunately, these insights have not been fully embraced in public or political dialogues.

While encouraging intentional choices regarding children’s screen content, I do not imply that individual responsibility is the sole solution. We are experiencing a digital public health crisis, as highlighted by General Vivek Murthy, the U.S. Surgeon General, who noted that social media can heighten the risks of anxiety and depression in youth. There is an urgent need for comprehensive policies that tackle the technological and economic frameworks underpinning these platforms. This is where Kyle should focus his efforts.

Meanwhile, the proposals from Kyle should not rely on outdated public guidance. They must be rooted in a nuanced understanding of varied screen use, addressing both physical and mental health concerns while tackling systemic issues in digital platform design. Crucially, they must consider not just the quantity, but also the quality of children’s digital engagement.

Until such changes are made, the onus of responsibility falls on individuals—particularly parents—to ensure their children are learning, engaging, proactive, and safe during screen time. I know this may feel overwhelming. To help, here are some strategies to implement with my kids this summer.

  • For younger children, limited screen time is generally preferable. If screens are used, I recommend watching live TV on platforms like CBeebies or CBBC, emphasizing quality engagement.

  • Prioritize content that encourages active participation over passive consumption. Content that fosters creativity and dialogue supports cognitive engagement and enhances communication skills, often leading to meaningful discussions.

  • Begin instilling critical thinking about digital content early. Use tools like SightEngine to analyze images, helping to distinguish between real and potentially misleading content. This sparks conversation about online misinformation.

  • Engage older children in discussions about a healthy digital diet. Together, commit to actively seeking out positive content for 30 minutes each week, deliberately avoiding uninteresting or negatively skewed material. Teach them that even negative engagement, such as liking or commenting on unfavorable content, contributes to its visibility.

  • As a family, regularly declutter your digital spaces by removing content that no longer inspires or educates. This includes unfollowing unwanted accounts, personalities, and brands to refine your feed to what truly resonates with you.

  • Consider exploring alternative search engines as a family to minimize targeted ads. DuckDuckGo and Firefox Focus do not track users for advertising purposes, and Startpage allows users to utilize Google while maintaining privacy.

While the government may not effectively regulate digital technology, parents still hold the power to guide intentional screen use. By doing so, we can instill concepts of healthy and critical screen engagement from a young age.

  • Dr. Kaitlyn Regehr is the Programme Director for Digital Humanities at University College London, where she lectures on digital literacy and the ethical implications of social media and AI. She is also the author of Smartphone Nation: Exploring our obsession with screens and actionable solutions.

Source: www.theguardian.com

A Solar-Powered Drone Larger than a Jumbo Jet Can Stay Airborne for Months

Skydweller drone

Skydweller

A solar-powered surveillance drone boasting a wingspan larger than that of the Boeing 747 is capable of flying continuously for weeks or even months, as claimed by its operators. A test flight is currently underway off the US Gulf Coast this month.

Run by the US-Spanish venture Skydweller Aero, the Skydweller drone features a 72-meter wingspan, surpassing the width of most commercial jets. Weighing approximately 2,500 kilograms—similar to a Ford F-150 truck—this drone aims to achieve the first solar-powered flight globally, which was targeted for 2016, with a mission to carry out “pure targeted flights” over 13 kilometers during daylight, while aspiring towards building a “comparable solar-powered carbon fiber drone.”

The Skydweller drone executed the world’s inaugural autonomous solar-powered flight in April 2024, with several subsequent test flights conducted throughout the year. Military funding evaluations are focusing on the viability of marine drone patrols. Military funding is assessing the feasibility of marine drone patrols.

Most recently, the solar-powered drone accomplished its longest flight after departing from Stennis International Airport in Mississippi on July 20. According to the Flightradar24 Flight Tracking Service, it remained aloft over the Gulf Coast for more than three days, landing on July 23. The service also indicated that, on July 14, the drone had flown for over 18 hours.

The wingspan of the Skydweller drone is nearly double that of major surveillance drones, such as the Northrop Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk used by the US Air Force. Its payload capacity of 400 kilograms significantly surpasses the lifting capabilities of most solar drones. Recently, the French aerospace company Thales contributed to the development of the Skydweller drone by equipping it with air surveillance radar. Equipment was provided for enhancing its capabilities.

However, experts suggest that the decades-long pursuit of commercializing solar drones has largely been marked by unmet promises and monumental failures. Arthur Holland Michele, a research partner at the Oslo Peace Institute, points out that both Google and Facebook attempted to create solar-powered drones for internet services but eventually discontinuing their initiatives. Aerospace manufacturer Airbus, too, has heavily invested in smaller Zephyr solar-electric drones, yet “we haven’t observed significant returns thus far,” states Michele.

“The military has funded solar drone demonstration flights for over ten years, and no one has yet acquired the technology,” Michele explains. “While solar drones are impressive and theoretically meaningful, their practical sustainability as a business case remains unclear.”

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

How Human Eggs Stay Viable for Decades

SEI 259122427

Egg cells do not dispose of waste like other cells.

Sebastian Kauritzki / Aramie

Human eggs appear to manage waste differently than other cell types.

All women are born with a limited supply of egg cells, or oocytes, expected to last around 50 years. This duration is remarkably extended for a single cell. Certain human cells, including brain and retinal cells, can persist for a lifetime, but the innate processes that facilitate their function often lead to gradual damage over time.

Cells require protein recycling as part of their housekeeping, but this comes with a price. The energy spent during this process can generate reactive oxygen species (ROS), which inflict random damage on the cells. “This background damage is ever-present,” notes Elvan Beke from the Spanish Genome Regulation Center. “An increase in ROS correlates with increased damage.”

However, it appears that healthy eggs circumvent this issue. To investigate this phenomenon, Beke and her team examined human eggs under a microscope. The cells were immersed in a fluid containing a fluorescent dye that binds to acidic cellular components known as lysosomes, which are considered “recycling plants.” Gabriele Zaffagnini from the University of Cologne, Germany, was involved in this study.

The bright dyes indicated that the lysosomes containing waste in human eggs demonstrated less activity compared to similar structures in other human cells or small mammalian egg cells, such as those from mice. Zaffagnini and his colleagues theorize that this may serve a self-preservation purpose.

According to Zaffagnini, reducing the waste recycling process might be one of several strategies employed by human egg cells to maintain their extended lifespan. Beke suggests that human oocytes appear to “put the brakes on everything” in order to minimize damage, as all cellular functions slow down in these eggs, thereby lowering the production of harmful ROS.

Slowing the protein recycling mechanism seems beneficial for egg cell health, and failure to do so could explain the prevalence of unhealthy oocytes. “This insight might help explain why human oocytes become dysfunctional after a certain age,” states M-Re from Yale University School of Medicine. “This could lead to a broader understanding of the challenges faced by human oocytes,” he adds.

Fluorescent dyes highlight human egg cells, showcasing components
such as mitochondria (orange) and DNA (light blue).

Gabriele Zaffagnini/Centro de Regulación Genómica

Evaluating egg cell health in this manner could enhance fertility therapies. “It’s well-known that protein degradation is vital for cell survival, directly affecting fertility,” explains Beke, who is focused on researching healthy egg cells. There are ongoing comparisons between oocytes and cells from individuals encountering fertility issues. “Elevated ROS levels correlate with poor IVF outcomes,” she states.

Research on human egg cells is still in its early stages due to inherent complexities. “They are hard to manipulate due to sample constraints,” comments Beke. Seri mentions that this is one of several “layers” complicating egg cell studies, including regulatory limitations and funding challenges.

Zaffagnini believes that overcoming these obstacles could lead to “truly astonishing” discoveries. “It’s certainly worth pursuing,” he concludes.

Topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

AI’s Hallucinations Are Intensifying—and They’re Here to Stay

Errors Tend to Occur with AI-Generated Content

Paul Taylor/Getty Images

AI chatbots from tech giants like OpenAI and Google have seen several inference upgrades in recent months. Ideally, these upgrades would lead to more reliable answers, but recent tests indicate that performance may be worse than that of previous models. Errors called “hallucinations,” particularly in the “hagatsuki” category, have been persistent issues that developers have struggled to eliminate.

Hallucination is the broad term used to describe specific errors generated by large-scale language models (LLMs) from organizations like OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini. It primarily refers to instances where these models present false information as fact, but it can also describe instances where a generated answer is accurate yet irrelevant to the question posed.

A technical report from OpenAI evaluating the latest LLMs revealed that the O3 and O4-MINI models, released in April, exhibit significantly higher hallucination rates compared to earlier O1 models introduced in late 2024. For instance, if O4-MINI had a summary accuracy of 33%, the hallucination rate for O3 was similarly at 33%, whereas the O1 model maintained a rate of only 16%.

This issue is not exclusive to OpenAI. The popular leaderboard showcases various inference models from different companies assessing their hallucination rates, including the DeepSeek-R1 model. This model has shown increased hallucination rates compared to previous versions, undergoing several reasoning steps before reaching a conclusion.

An OpenAI spokesperson stated, “We are actively working to reduce hallucination rates in O3 and O4-MINI. Hallucinations are inherently more common in inference models. We will continue our research across all models to enhance accuracy and reliability.”

Some potential applications of LLMs can be significantly impeded by hallucinations. Models that frequently produce misinformation are unsuitable as research assistants, and a bot stating fictitious legal cases could endanger lawyers. Customer service agents falsely citing obsolete policies can also create significant challenges for businesses.

Initially, AI companies believed they would resolve these issues over time. Historically, models had shown reduced hallucinations with each update, yet the recent spikes in hallucination rates complicate this narrative.

Vectara’s leaderboard ranks models based on their consistency in summarizing documents. This indicates that for systems from OpenAI and Google, “hallucination rates are roughly comparable for inference and irrational models,” as noted by Forest Shen Bao from Vectara. Google has not provided further comments. For leaderboard assessments, the specific rates of hallucinations are less significant than each model’s overall ranking, according to Bao.

However, these rankings may not effectively compare AI models. For one, different types of hallucinations are often conflated. The Vectara team pointed out that the DeepSeek-R1 model demonstrated a 14.3% hallucination rate, but many of these hallucinations were “benign,” being logically deduced yet not appearing in the original text.

Another issue with these rankings is that tests based on text summaries “reveal nothing about the percentage of incorrect output” for tasks where LLMs are applied, as stated by Emily Bender at Washington University. She suggests that leaderboard results don’t provide a comprehensive evaluation of this technology, particularly since LLMs are not solely designed for text summarization.

These models generate answers by repeatedly answering the question, “What is the next word?” to formulate responses, thus not processing information in a traditional sense. However, many technology companies continue to use the term “hallucination” to describe output errors.

“The term ‘hallucination’ is doubly problematic,” says Bender. “On one hand, it implies that false output is abnormal and could potentially be mitigated, while on the other hand, it inaccurately anthropomorphizes the machine since large language models lack awareness.”

Arvind Narayanan from Princeton University argues that the issue extends beyond hallucinations. Models can also produce errors by utilizing unreliable sources or outdated information. Merely increasing training data and computational power may not rectify the problems.

We may have to accept the reality of error-prone AI, as Narayanan mentioned in a recent social media post. In some circumstances, it may be prudent to use such models solely for tasks requiring fact-checking. The best approach might be to avoid relying on AI chatbots for factual information altogether.

Source: www.newscientist.com

The sharks never stay quiet

Hound Shark Species Mustelus lenticulatus

Paul Kaiger

At least one shark species has bark that can be chewed. Scientists report that clicks can be made.

During his doctoral studies at the University of Auckland, New Zealand, Carolyn NeederHe was currently studying shark hearing at Woods Hole Marine Facility in Massachusetts. When dealing with sharks during the experiment, she noticed one species – a hound (a rig called a rig)Mustelus lenticulatus) – It looked like it was making a metallic click.

“The sharks weren’t supposed to make noise, so I ignored it,” Nieder says. “And that was just happening.”

The ability to intentionally produce sounds is common among terrestrial animals, as the world full of bird verticals and mammalian plagues shows. However, underwater, many fish make noises by shaving objects or vibrating muscles, and in 2022 researchers reported that relatives near sharks can sometimes click when divers interfere. The shark sounds had not yet been officially explained.

To confirm the presence of the rig’s noise, Nieder and her colleagues brought 10 boys rigs into the lab, caught up in the waters of New Zealand’s North Island. There, they were placed in the tank with sensitive sound recording instruments. The team gently handled the sharks and found that all of them were clicking accordingly. Rigs seem to be the first shark known to produce sounds that are not associated with other actions, such as feeding or bumping into something.

Researchers believe that sharks may be producing sounds by snapping their jaws together. Just like click rays, the rig flattens the teeth, which can produce sharp sounds on the impact. Please listen to the following:


https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/25180709/audio-1.wavhttps://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/25180709/audio-1.wav?_=1![endif]->

Further research may check whether the cause of clicks and whether there is a feature. Nieder points out that because rigs are small sharks and potential prey for large animals, clicks can play a role in defense when animals are bitten or gripped.

“It could be a bit confusing for predators,” she says. It is also possible that clicks play a role in hunting, she adds, including scaring and inclusive shark crustacean prey.

Rig shark teeth

Eric Palmentier

“This has been seen for a long time, but is a potentially very important area of ​​shark biology,” he says. Aaron Rice He was not involved in research at Cornell University in New York.

When healthy production is widespread among sharks, their clicks may help them study populations that often decline rapidly, says Rice. He says there is a very rich sound data recorded from fish and whale studies, and it is possible that they also shot shark sounds. These can be used to determine if a shark is in the area and add another tool to monitor at-risk predators.

“[The finding] It represents something truly new and new discoveries in basic biology,” says Rice.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Stay entertained while ranking the hottest video game characters | Games

IS Lara Croft Hot? This is the question that has been troubling us for nearly three decades. She made her debut on the cover of Face Magazine in 1997 alongside the tagline “larger than Pammy.” TV special aimed at uncovering the “real” tomb raider. But what does science have to say about it? In a world where American academics are hesitant to use the term “woman” without jeopardizing their research funding, it is reassuring to see that a betting site named Casino Days has taken on this important task and recently compiled a list of “the top 10 most attractive video game characters according to science.”

Using the so-called “golden ratio” – which assesses beauty based on facial proportions – the company discovered that Lara Croft ranks as the second most attractive video game character in the virtual realm. Ultimately, claiming the top spot is Geralt of Rivia from The Witcher series.

The rest of the rankings include Arthur Morgan from Red Dead Redemption in fifth place and Yennefer of Vengerberg from The Witcher in eighth place. What’s most surprising about these findings is not the ongoing fixation on the attractiveness of video game characters, but rather the enduring popularity of these familiar faces. When will we see Guybrush Threepwood on the list? Mario must be wondering when his turn is. Sporting a pointed, pixelated chest is one thing, but coordinating the hat with the shirt under those dungarees during a hard day of plumbing? That takes dedication. Consistency. Blessing.

Hello, is it me you’re looking for… The dashing protagonist 3 of Luigi’s Mansion 3. Photo: Nintendo

Real scientists, this time, have discovered that “good behavior” can make one’s face appear even more attractive to others – with sincerity being deemed more attractive than deceit, but men losing points for appearing aggressive. So, judging video game characters based on the symmetrical perfection of their faces seems somewhat antiquated.

According to “science,” the most captivating video game characters include Bella Goth from The Sims, Harvey from Stardew Valley, King of Hyrule, the Red Ghost from Pac-Man, and Flo from Diner Dash. If we continue to assert rankings and ratings on each other, even hundreds of years later, why stop now – can’t we at least tone down our desires a bit? Can’t we acknowledge the allure of the perpetually fiery king in those mobile game advertisements?

Skip past newsletter promotions
Brutally taken away…Guybrush Threepwood. Photo: Lucasarts

Unfortunately, a press release from Casino Days has crowned Princess Zelda as the most attractive video game character. Not only is this tragic due to its sexist undertones, but also because Zelda embodies a multitude of femininity. Does she have too many resemblances to Ganondorf, and like Princess Peach before her, can’t she catch a break without being objectified? The text itself highlights the dangers of being cute and blonde in a world dominated by malevolence, forcing Zelda to constantly assert her identity as cute rather than just blonde. Will she have to reveal more skin to prove her worth? (Most likely, yes. Those Bokoblins mean business.)

Isn’t she cute and blonde? Zelda: The Legend of Zelda: The Kingdom’s Tears Photo: Nintendo

We are living in a time of significant transformations and upheavals. And by that, I don’t mean that World War III is looming on the horizon. I mean that the women in games are getting a facelift, with Ciri in Witcher 4 likely lost some of her allure because she matured. So, amidst all the chaos and evil in our world, some things remain constant – everyone can agree that from left to right (B, A, start) – Lara Croft and Geralt of Rivia are hot. Regardless of what comes next, it’s evident that we will continue to debate the attractiveness of lines of code for years to come.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Life & Style: Must-Have Cold Weather Essentials to Stay Warm From Electric Blankets to Cozy Coats

aAfter a mostly mild and cloudy December, winter has finally arrived. We’ve rounded up some of the most popular and tried-and-true products to help you stay warm, especially when you don’t want to turn up the thermostat too much.


From slippers to coats and pajamas to top-of-the-line electric heaters and blankets, they’ll all help you beat the cold and even stay stylish.


The best cold weather essentials to beat the cold


electric blanket

OHS electric heated fleece overblanket

£20 at Online Home Shop

£34.99 on Amazon

This great value heater throw was rated the best budget option in 2008. emily peck Reviews of the best heated blankets. Available in blush, charcoal, forest green, and black, it comes with 9 temperature settings and a timer that turns it off after 9 hours.


heating airer

Dry: Quickly Deluxe 3-Stage Heated Airer and Cover

£149.99 on Amazon

£194.98 at Lakeland

Warm air dryers claim to dry clothes regardless of the weather without costing the earth any energy. jane hoskin We tested 12 and rated this one from Lakeland as the best overall. She says this dryer is for people who are tired of having to choose between the expense of noisy tumble dryers, dirty clothes on the radiator, and the smell of laundry that dries slowly in traditional clothes dryers. It is said to be for people who have.


electric heater

Duux Threesixty 2 Ceramic Heater

£89.99 at John Lewis

£99.99 at Currys

The mercury is dropping and the house is getting colder. But if you have your finger hovering over your central heating dial, an electric heater may be just what you need to efficiently heat your colander. pete wise We tested eight of the best, including this compact model that thoroughly heats a space while making less noise than standard fan models.

Source: www.theguardian.com

NASA astronauts to extend their stay in space by boarding Boeing spacecraft

NASA announced on Tuesday that two astronauts have been stranded on the International Space Station since a problem with their Boeing spacecraft in June. Due to delays, they will have to remain there even longer.

The next astronaut launch to the ISS, originally scheduled for February, has been postponed to late March. This is to allow the new SpaceX spacecraft used for the mission more time to complete processing.

The four crew members currently on board the station must wait for the next crew member to arrive before departing in another SpaceX Dragon capsule. Among them are NASA astronauts Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore, who are set to embark on the first test flight of Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft.

Originally planned to spend about a week on the space station, Williams and Wilmore have now been living and working in orbit for over nine months, including additional time due to the recent delay.

Typically, new crew members overlap with departing crew members for a short period on the ISS, known as the handover period. During this time, astronauts exchange information about ongoing experiments, maintenance projects, and other protocols.

When Williams and Wilmore finally depart, NASA astronaut Nick Haig and Russian cosmonaut Alexander Gorbunov will also return home with them.

December 2, 2024, ISS astronaut Suni Williams.
NASA (via Flickr)

According to officials, the new Dragon capsule scheduled for launch in late March should arrive at NASA’s processing facility in Florida in early January. Steve Stich, NASA’s commercial crew program manager, emphasized the meticulous attention to detail required in manufacturing, assembling, testing, and integrating a new spacecraft.

The capsule, known as Crew 10, will be launched by NASA astronauts Anne McClain and Nicole Ayers, Russian cosmonaut Kirill Peskov, and Japanese cosmonaut Takuya Onishi. Until then, the quartet will continue training for the mission at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston.

Source: www.nbcnews.com

United Kingdom must accelerate adoption of electric cars to stay ahead of competitors

This push for electric cars isn’t about a culture war. It’s a simple choice. Can we prepare British industry to take advantage of the changes that are coming? Or will we leave it alone to let our competitors run laps until we decide whether to change our tires? Or?

The previous government, including the current opposition leader, may have been content to play politics with people’s jobs at stake by delaying the end of sales of new gasoline and diesel cars. But this government is not like that.

Prior to that, we were on track to meet the 2030 deadline and the electric vehicle mandate had wide support from industry. More than two-thirds of UK car manufacturers had already committed to a full transition to electric cars by 2030, and investment was starting to pour into building electric cars here at home.

However, the decision to delay the transition has resulted in significant costs for companies that were already gearing up to meet the 2030 deadline, dealing a major blow to our credibility and putting investment, jobs, and growth at risk.

This Government has clearly recognized the fact that if we want the car industry to survive in the UK, we need to provide certainty and confidence to investors, not change our targets.

Having grown up in Sunderland, home to the Nissan factory, I know first-hand how important the car industry is to local communities in delivering growth, jobs, and wealth creation. The UK car industry employs over 150,000 people, and its continued success plays a major role in our mission to grow the economy.

If we get this transition right and support the growth of the UK electric vehicle market, we have a huge opportunity to tap into a multi-billion pound industry that can create well-paid jobs for decades to come.

That’s why in our manifesto we committed to moving back the transition to electric cars to 2030 and phasing out the sale of new cars with internal combustion engines.

But we want to work with industry and make sure that their voice is heard on how to get there. That’s why we’re fast-tracking a consultation to see how the government can support manufacturers, investors, and the industry as a whole to achieve our goals. To be clear, the content of this consultation is how do not have if We will achieve this ambition.

Working families also benefit from this transition. EVs are becoming more affordable and practical, prices are starting to fall, they are cheaper to run and maintain, range is improving, charging infrastructure is expanding rapidly, and demand in the UK is increasing. It is increasing.

And of course, with road traffic contributing up to 30% of air pollution, a shift to electric vehicles means cleaner, healthier air for our children and future generations.

Delaying the transition will only make it harder and more expensive for the industry and families in the long run. That’s why we want to do everything possible to ensure that the next generation of zero-emissions vehicles are designed and manufactured here in the UK, are affordable and accessible to workers, and encourage the uptake of electric vehicles. That’s what I think.

That’s why the Chancellor announced more than £2 billion will be spent on producing zero-emission cars. This funding will support the latest research and development of these technologies, accelerate commercial scale-up, and enable capital investment.

On the demand side, people involved in promoting electric vehicles are concerned about the availability of charging points. That’s why we’re investing over £200m to accelerate the rollout of charging points, building on the 71,000 public charging points already available.

Skip past newsletter promotions

We are currently taking proactive steps to foster stability in this sector, but we are also developing long-term plans to ensure UK motor manufacturing can grow and thrive.

We are already seeing manufacturers embrace zero-emission vehicles and the transition to a greener economy, with governments fully supporting manufacturers. Jaguar Land Rover will move to a 100% fully electric vehicle range over the next five years, investing billions of dollars into the UK economy. At the same time, we can see Toyota investing heavily to make its UK manufacturing operations 100% carbon neutral by 2030.


When governments say decarbonization must not mean deindustrialization, we mean it. There is no path to net zero without the support of British industry and workers.

With Ford recently announcing job cuts across Europe and Stellantis proposing to close Vauxhall’s Luton factory, we’ve learned more about the global challenges facing the industry and how we’re working to help. We have no doubts about the need to play a role.

That’s exactly why I’ve been sitting around the table talking directly with industry leaders about how best to make this transition happen, and my message has always been loud and clear. The Government is listening and we will work closely with you to deliver our plans.

The bottom line is: Either we look ahead and leverage the clean energy transition to deliver growth, creating new jobs and a greener future, or we fall behind. is. This government will not make the same mistakes as the past and will not tolerate it.

Jonathan Reynolds is Secretary of State for Business and Trade.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Boeing executives stay mum following Starliner spacecraft’s return

summary

  • Boeing executives have made few public comments about the company’s Starliner spacecraft in the past six weeks.
  • The capsule returned to Earth without any crew on Saturday, ending a trouble-plagued test flight.
  • Boeing representatives did not attend a scheduled post-landing briefing.

Just over an hour after Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft returned empty to Earth, NASA held its regular post-landing briefing to discuss the conclusion of the eventful test flight.

Conspicuous by the absence of any Boeing representatives at the event early Saturday morning.

In fact, the last time Boeing representatives attended a press conference about the Starliner program was in late July, when the capsule was experiencing hardware issues that caused it to stay a few weeks longer than planned at the International Space Station, and questions were swirling about whether the two NASA astronauts who had been sent into orbit aboard the Boeing-built spacecraft would be able to return home safely.

NASA officials say they are working closely with Boeing, but the company’s absence from the event and limited public statements have raised questions about its commitment to transparency and the future of the Starliner program.

Boeing did not respond to multiple requests for comment on the change in the company’s name recognition.

Ahead of a post-landing news conference held last week at NASA’s Johnson Space Center in Houston, NASA’s public advisory included the names of two Boeing executives who will be participating.

Eric Berger, a senior editor at Ars Technica, was there. Written About X Shortly before the press conference began, two chairs were removed from the podium, in what appeared to be a last-minute change in configuration.

Joel Montalbano, NASA’s associate administrator for Space Operations Mission Directorate, Asked about Boeing’s absence During the briefing

“We spoke to Boeing prior to this, and they gave NASA the concession to represent them on this mission,” he said.

A few days later, in response to a question from NBC News, a NASA spokesperson referred Montalbano to his response at the press conference.

Mark Nappi, vice president and program manager for Boeing’s commercial crew programs, instead attended the briefing. A statement on the company’s website.

“I commend the Starliner team for their hard work in ensuring a successful and safe undocking, deorbit, re-entry, and landing,” he wrote. “We will review the data and determine next steps for the program.”

Boeing said the capsule would be transported to NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida, where engineers would analyze the flight data. No other details about the spacecraft’s status were released.

Starliner launched astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams to the International Space Station in early June. The capsule’s first manned test flight was scheduled to last about eight days. However, a helium leak from the spacecraft’s propulsion system and a thruster failure while docking with the space station kept Starliner and its crew in space for months.

NASA held several media briefings over the summer to provide updates on the ongoing investigation into the thruster issue and how its findings might affect the remainder of the flight. Initially, NASA and Boeing officials attended the briefings jointly, but no Boeing representatives were present at the August press conference.

That month, NASA was considering how and when to return Wilmore and Williams safely. Asked why Boeing was absent from most of the briefings in August, NASA officials said the updates were for NASA consideration and therefore no company representatives were included.

On August 24, NASA announced it would ask SpaceX to return the astronauts and fly Boeing’s Starliner back to Earth without a crew member. The pair will stay on the space station until February, after which they will return with the next ISS crew.

in X Statement In response to NASA’s decision, Boeing wrote: “Our focus remains first and foremost on the safety of our crew and spacecraft. We are conducting the mission in accordance with NASA’s decision and are preparing the spacecraft for a safe and successful uncrewed return.”

The Starliner spacecraft ultimately returned safely to Earth, landing at White Sands Spaceport in New Mexico just after midnight on Saturday.

The manned test flight was intended to demonstrate that Boeing could reliably transport astronauts to the space station and pave the way for NASA to approve regular flights to the orbital laboratory.

Boeing developed the Starliner spacecraft under NASA’s Commercial Crew Program, an effort launched in 2011 to support privately built spacecraft to fill the gap left by NASA’s retired space shuttle fleet.

Even before its latest flight, the Starliner program was more than $1.5 billion over budget and years behind schedule: In 2019, an uncrewed test flight to the space station was canceled due to technical issues, forcing the company to wait until 2022 to try again.

Rival company SpaceX is developing its Crew Dragon spacecraft as part of the same program, with regular flights to the space station beginning in 2020. NASA has said it wants two private companies to certify such flights so it has redundant options for reaching low Earth orbit.

Source: www.nbcnews.com

NASA is contemplating extending Boeing astronauts’ stay on space station until February

NASA is considering keeping its two astronauts there until February as they make their way to the International Space Station after the Boeing spacecraft encountered problems during the flight.

NASA said Wednesday it was still considering options for how to return astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams safely to Earth and that no plans had been made yet, but officials acknowledged more openly than before that it may decide to use a SpaceX capsule instead.

“Our first option is to return Butch and Suni aboard Starliner,” Steve Stich, NASA’s commercial crew program manager, said at a press conference Wednesday. “But we are making the necessary plans to ensure we have other options and are working with SpaceX to ensure we are prepared to respond.”

Wilmore and Williams arrived at the space station on June 6 on the first crewed test flight of Boeing’s Starliner spacecraft. The original plan was to stay in space for about a week. But a problem with five of Starliner’s thrusters caused the spacecraft’s propulsion system to leak helium, leaving the astronauts stranded in space for more than two months while engineers on the ground gather data on the problem and attempt to troubleshoot it.

The mission was planned as the final step before Boeing is approved to launch regular crewed flights to the ISS, a process whose fate is now up in the air.

NASA gave no indication of when astronauts might return in the Boeing capsule, but Stich said a final decision would need to be made by mid-August.

NASA astronauts Butch Wilmore (left) and Suni Williams before boarding the Boeing Starliner spacecraft at Cape Canaveral Space Force Station in Florida on May 6.
John Laux/AP File

Meanwhile, the launch of one of SpaceX’s Dragon spacecraft, which was scheduled to deliver a new crew of four to the space station later this month, has been postponed to give NASA and Boeing more time to address issues with the Starliner.

SpaceX mission (Crew 9) NASA officials said they could change plans to send just two crew members into space on the spacecraft instead of four, and use the capsule to bring Wilmore and Williams home.

Ken Bowersox, associate administrator for NASA’s Space Operations Mission Directorate, said there had been disagreements over how to bring the astronauts home safely.

“We have to admit that when we have disagreements, it’s not fun,” Bowersox said. “Those discussions can be painful, but that’s what makes us a good organization, and it helps us make good decisions in the future when we get to that point, and I don’t think we’re that far away.”

If Wilmore and Williams were to return to Earth in a separate spacecraft, mission managers could adjust Starliner’s software to detach it from the space station and return to Earth without a crew member, Stich said.

Boeing officials did not attend the briefing, but a company representative said in a statement that “we remain confident in Starliner’s capabilities and flight principles.”

“Should NASA decide to modify the mission, we will take the necessary steps to prepare Starliner for an uncrewed return,” the statement said.

The thruster problem occurred as Starliner approached the space station in June, forcing a delay in the docking process. Meanwhile, the helium leak was already on mission managers’ radar before launch, who said at the time that the leak was unlikely to affect the mission or the safety of astronauts.

NASA and Boeing engineers have been trying to replicate on-orbit conditions with a test engine at NASA’s White Sands Test Facility in New Mexico, and mission managers have also conducted two “hot-fire” tests in space, in which the capsule’s thrusters were briefly fired while docked to the space station.

Stich said Wednesday that tests showed that small Teflon seals expand under high temperatures, possibly contributing to the thruster failure. When the seals expand, they likely block the flow of propellant to the thrusters, he said.

Further testing is needed to understand the cause of the potential blockage and why it went undetected during the recent hot-fire test. Last week, NASA reported that the thrusters used to steer the spacecraft in orbit and guide it into position before re-entering Earth’s atmosphere appeared to be stable.

“This gives us a lot of confidence in the thruster, but we can’t prove with complete certainty that what we’re seeing in orbit is exactly what we’re replicating on the ground,” Stich said.

The recent Starliner debacle has been a blow to Boeing, especially since the program was already years behind schedule and more than $1.5 billion over budget before astronauts even launched.

Boeing and SpaceX developed the space capsule as part of NASA’s Commercial Crew Program, an effort launched more than a decade ago to help private companies build new spacecraft to carry astronauts to low Earth orbit. The program began after NASA retired the Space Shuttle.

SpaceX has been ferrying astronauts to the International Space Station since 2020.

Source: www.nbcnews.com