How Platforms Lobby for Exemptions Amid the Ban on Aussie Teen Social Media

The Australian government is rapidly identifying which social media platforms will face restrictions for users under 16.

Social Services Minister Tanya Plibersek stated on Monday that the government “will not be intimidated by the actions of social media giants.” Nevertheless, tech companies are vigorously advocating for exemptions from the law set to take effect in December.

Here’s what social media companies are doing to support their case:


The parent company of Facebook and Instagram has introduced new Instagram teen account settings to signal their commitment to teenage safety on the platform.

Recently, Meta revealed New protections, which aim to enhance direct message security by automatically censoring nude images and implementing blocking features.

Additionally, Meta hosted a “Screen Smart” safety event in Sydney targeted at “Parent Creators,” led by Sarah Harris.

Sign up: AU Breaking News Email

YouTube

YouTube’s approach is even more assertive. Last year, Communications Minister Michelle Roland suggested the platform would be exempt from social media restrictions.

However, last month, the Esafety Commissioner advised the government to reconsider this exemption, citing research indicating that children often encounter harmful materials on YouTube.

Since then, the company has escalated its lobbying efforts, including full-page advertisements claiming YouTube can be used by “everyone,” alongside a letter sent to Communications Minister Anica Wells warning of a potential high court challenge if YouTube is subjected to the ban.


YouTube advertisement campaign opposing social media restrictions set to commence in December. Photo: Michael Karendiane/Guardian

As reported by Guardian Australia last month, Google is hosting its annual showcase this week at the Capitol on Wednesday. There, content creators, including child musicians, who oppose the YouTube ban will likely express their views to politicians.

Last year’s event featured the Wiggles, who met with Roland. This meeting was mentioned in a letter sent to Rowland last year when YouTube’s global CEO Neal Mohan requested the exemption within 48 hours of the promised relief.

Guardian Australia reported last week that YouTube met with Wells this month for an in-person discussion regarding the ban.

TikTok


Screenshots from TikTok’s advertisements highlighting its benefits for teenagers. Photo: TikTok

This month, TikTok is running ads on its platform as well as on Meta channels, promoting educational benefits for teens on vertical video platforms.

Skip past newsletter promotions

“The 1.7m #fishtok video encourages outdoor activities in exchange for screen time,” the advertisement states, acknowledging the government’s assertion that the ban would promote time spent outside. “They are developing culinary skills through cooking videos that have garnered over 13m views,” it continues.

“A third of users visit the STEM feed weekly to foster learning,” another ad claims.

Snapchat


Screenshot of Snapchat’s educational video about signs of grooming featuring Lambros army. Photo: Snapchat

Snapchat emphasizes user safety. In May, Guardian Australia reported on an instance involving an 11-year-old girl who added random users as part of a competition with her friend for high scores on the app.

This month, Snapchat announced a partnership with the Australian Federal Police-led Australian Centre to address child exploitation through a series of educational videos shared by various Australian influencers, along with advertisements advising parents and teens on identifying grooming and sextortion.

“Ensuring safety within the Snapchat community has always been our top priority, and collaborating closely with law enforcement and safety experts is crucial to that effort,” stated Ryan Ferguson, Australia’s Managing Director at Snap.

The platform has also reiterated account settings for users aged 13-17, including default private accounts and chat warnings when communicating with individuals who lack shared friends or are absent from contact lists.

Thus far, the government seems unyielding.

“It is undeniable that young people’s mental health has been adversely affected due to social media engagement, prompting the government’s actions,” Prime Minister Anthony Albanese told ABC insiders on Sunday.

“I will meet again with individuals who have faced tragedy this week… one concern expressed by some social media companies is our leadership on this matter, and we take pride in effectively confronting these threats.”




Source: www.theguardian.com

Trump grants tariff exemptions for smartphones, computers, and other electronic gadgets

Following more than a week of tariffs on imports from China, the Trump administration released regulations late Friday that spared smartphones, computers, semiconductors, and other electronic devices from various fees. This move significantly reduced prices for high-tech companies like Apple and Dell, as well as for consumers purchasing iPhones and other electronic products.

A message issued by US Customs and Border Protection on Friday included a lengthy list of products that faced tariffs on Chinese goods. Notably, exclusions were granted to smartphones, computers, semiconductors, and other technology products. However, additional duties will still apply to electronic devices and smartphones, as well as an increase in tariffs on semiconductors.

This exemption is a significant relief for tech giants like Apple and Nvidia, who would have faced substantial losses from punitive taxes. Many consumers rushed to purchase iPhones to avoid potential price hikes on electronic devices. These exemptions may help mitigate inflation and uncertainty in the economy.

The tariff relief marks a change in Trump’s trade policies aimed at promoting US manufacturing. Factories producing electronic devices like iPhones and laptops are primarily located in Asia, particularly China. The exemptions apply not only to China but also to other countries.

However, this relief may be short-lived as the Trump administration plans another trade investigation related to semiconductors. This could impact other technology products and result in additional tariffs. The administration aims to protect American semiconductor production, which is essential for various consumer products.

Despite the exemptions, Trump remains committed to domestic manufacturing of these products, signaling a shift towards US production. The policy change aims to secure the supply of American semiconductors, crucial for smartphones, cars, and various other goods.

The recent tariff exemptions signify a partial retreat from Trump’s trade war with China, covering a significant portion of US imports from the country. Other Asian countries stand to benefit as well, with the exemptions reducing tariffs on imports from Taiwan, Malaysia, Vietnam, and Thailand.

Trump’s decision to exempt certain product types followed a volatile week where he reversed course on several tariffs imposed earlier. The exemption excludes China, which retaliated with its own tariffs. This led to a steep decline in the stock values of tech companies, notably impacting Apple’s market capitalization.

The tech industry views Trump’s moderation as a positive development, as it eases tensions and supports continued investment in the US. Notably, Apple CEO Tim Cook has been actively engaging with the administration to secure exemptions for Apple products and promote US manufacturing.

However, the threat of further tariffs on semiconductors and other electronics looms, with potential implications for the industry. The Trump administration is considering additional duties under legal provisions, which could impact various sectors and imports.

Apple responds to the recent tariff exemptions, remains committed to China’s manufacturing facilities, citing challenges in skilled labor availability in the US compared to China. The company has faced pressure over the years to shift some iPhone manufacturing to the US, but logistical and workforce constraints pose significant hurdles.

The potential implications of Trump’s tariff policies on Apple products raise concerns about price increases and supply chain disruptions. Apple’s strategic decisions regarding manufacturing and pricing will have a significant impact on its operations and market positioning, considering ongoing trade tensions and regulatory changes.

The looming threat of additional tariffs on electronics underscores the uncertainty and volatility in the tech industry. As the US and China navigate trade negotiations and policy shifts, tech companies like Apple face challenging decisions to maintain competitiveness and comply with evolving regulations.

Apple’s stance on tariff exemptions and manufacturing challenges reflects the complex interplay between global trade dynamics and corporate strategies. The company’s extensive supply chain and reliance on Asian manufacturing facilities underscore the broader implications of trade policies on multinational corporations.

As trade tensions continue to escalate, tech companies like Apple must navigate regulatory uncertainties and market pressures. The potential impact of tariffs on product pricing, supply chains, and global competitiveness looms large as companies seek to balance operational efficiency and regulatory compliance.

The ongoing trade negotiations between the US and China, particularly regarding technology products, highlight the delicate balance between economic interests and national security concerns. The implications of tariff policies on semiconductors and electronics underscore the broader geopolitical challenges facing the tech industry.

As companies like Apple navigate shifting trade dynamics, regulatory changes, and market uncertainties, strategic decision-making becomes increasingly complex. The need to adapt to evolving trade policies while maintaining global competitiveness requires innovative solutions and proactive engagement with policymakers.

Source: www.nytimes.com

Coal plants ranked as the worst offenders in pursuit of environmental exemptions

The country’s most polluted coal burning power plant has called on President Trump to exempt it from stricter restrictions on dangerous air pollution after the administration recently invited businesses to apply for presidential pollution exemptions via email.

Aging Corstrip power plants in Corstrip, Montana release more harmful particulate matter contamination or soot than any other power plant in the country, the Environmental Protection Agency. The diagram is shown. The new rules adopted by the Biden administration in 2023 would have forced facilities to install new equipment because they lack modern pollution prevention, the country’s only coal plant.

The Colstrip Factory is currently applying for a two-year exemption from these rules, according to the Montana Legislature delegation that backed the request.

The new pollution standards “have at stake the economic viability of plants that will damage the local electrical grid if closed,” Sen. Steve Daines and other members of the delegation wrote in a letter sent Monday to EPA administrator Lee Zeldin. “Without the corstrip, consumers will bear a burden of higher energy costs and grid reliability, and their closure will hinder economic development in the region.”

Health experts pointed out that the letter does not address the health effects of fine contaminated particles. Many studies have shown that particles penetrate deep into the lungs and are small enough to enter the bloodstream, where they migrate to the heart and other organs, increasing mortality from cardiovascular and respiratory diseases.

A 2023 study showed that it emits coal-fired power plants, particularly fine particles containing sulfur dioxide. Related to higher mortality rates More than other types of pollution.

The contamination “can be extremely harmful, especially for young children with lung disease,” said Robert Merchant, a pulmonary surgeon at Billings, Mont. He said the delegation’s letters showed “complete indifference to health.”

Colstrip Plant’s stricter pollution rules exemption came after the EPA last month told businesses that they could apply for exemptions from key clean air rules by sending emails to agents. The EPA pointed to some of the Clean Air Act, which allows the president to temporarily exempt industrial facilities from the new rules if the technology necessary to meet these rules is not available, and if it is for national security.

The Trump administration has also announced its intention to roll back many of the rules completely. This could mean that plants like Corstrips ultimately do not need to meet new contamination standards.

The move was part of Zeldin’s broad efforts to guide energy and cars from its original role in environmental protection and regulation to make them more affordable.

Northwestern Energy Group and Talen Energy, which operate the factory along with other minority owners, did not immediately respond to comments.

The exemption granted by the Trump administration could face legal challenges from environmental groups. In creating the new rules, the Biden administration had identified already available technologies that would allow corstrip facilities to meet more stringent standards.

The Biden administration also estimated that new pollution prevention technology would cost much less for installations than the $500 million that the Corstrip factory said it would cost.

“These technologies are available,” said Amanda Levin, director of Policy Analysis for the Natural Resources Defense Council, an environmental advocacy group.

Source: www.nytimes.com