WAshley Neal enrolled in college in Texas in 2013, but needed money to pay for tuition. So, at the age of 18, she worked first as a camgirl and then as a stripper. As she walked from the stage to her dressing room, men would often try to put their fingers between her legs, so she learned how to dislocate her shoulder. After her third successful dislocation, her manager told her to stop defending herself.

Since then, she has continued her career in sex work, but in the world of technology. She worked at her FetLife, a social network for the fetish community. She experimented with an adult content subscription site where users pay in cryptocurrency. And now she has created her own AI romance app MyPeach.ai. MyPeach.ai uses AI-generated text and images to recreate the experience of chatting (and sexting) with someone online.

The porn industry is often at the forefront of emerging technologies, and rightfully so, especially since OpenAI doesn’t allow users to say dirty things to its chatbots, so Artificial Intelligence-powered Girlfriends is a smart choice for ChatGPT. It has become some of the first apps to capitalize on the mania. However, with the rise of AI-generated romance, pornographic deepfakes (fake images of real people), AI-generated images,
sentence
Depicting child sexual abuse, and even
harassment By a persistent chatbot. Is it possible to allow users to enjoy AI porn with safety measures in place?

“If I wasn’t a stripper, I probably wouldn’t have thought that men could be so terrifying,” said Neil, now 29. That’s why she has implemented ethical guardrails on her MyPeach.ai, prohibiting users from abusing virtual flaming. Please stop it.

Neil does this using a combination of human moderators and AI-powered tools. She is one of the few founders who emphasizes the ethics of AI romance apps. For example, users can flirt with May, an airbrushed brunette who refers to her human lover as “bbs.” She doesn’t get sneaky right away, but after her movie date, she writes, she wants to “have some fun together.” But if a user writes that he beat his girlfriend, hypnotized him, vomited on him, or forced him to engage in non-consensual acts (role play where one partner pretends to rape the other) , May would answer no.
Connor Cohn, chief technology officer of MyPeach.ai, said that while the line between foul language and abusive language differs for each AI character, calling a character “ugly and fat,” for example, would be inappropriate for the app’s bot. He said it crosses that line for most people.

Neale argues that MyPeach.ai’s moderation efforts go far beyond the majority of existing AI romance apps. Additionally, her app, which launched on Valentine’s Day, will soon host adult content creators who have consensually created AI replicas of themselves, and will specify what those AI doubles can and cannot do. For example, if a person is not sexually dominant, her AI itself will say no to users who encourage her to “dominate” in role-playing scenarios.

Neale said MyPeach.ai uses a series of technical tools to enforce the platform’s limits. These include hidden, plain-spoken instructions to AI algorithms about what they can and cannot say. This is the approach OpenAI uses with his ChatGPT. The AI is specifically trained to deny users’ requests to run dangerous scenarios. and human moderators who vet reported users. “We introduced hard-coded ethics, and based on my testing, I don’t think anyone else has done this,” Neal said.

Founded by Eugenia Kuyda, Replika may be the most famous AI companion app or platform that promises users a platonic or romantic relationship with a chatbot.
ambiguous AI’s stance on romance creates a gap in the market with competitors that are more explicitly focused on sex, like MyPeach.ai. Neal said these apps are typically founded by men, for men, and often have lax guidelines. Two of his more popular sites, Candy.ai and Anima AI, unlike MyPeach.ai, explicitly prohibit users from vomiting on her AI characters or participating in hardcore bondage. I have not.

Adult content creator Sophie Dee, who launched her own AI replica in December, also emphasized guardrails for her app, SophieAI. “This is a representation of me, so it should embody my values,” she wrote in an email, later adding that her AI was “designed to model healthy, consensual relationships.” It also includes the ability to opt out of certain conversations or topics.” Crossing programmed boundaries or violating the principle of consent. ”

The move towards ethical AI porn reflects developments within the wider porn industry, which has produced more female-centric and less exploitative content in recent years.

In 1984, former adult performer Candida Royal founded her own porn production company to create content more focused on female pleasure. She was one of the earliest producers of more explicitly feminist porn, said Lynn Comella, a professor at the University of Nevada, Las Vegas, who has written a book about the history of porn and feminist sex toy stores. “That’s reassuring. [more outwardly ethical AI sexbot developers] “They’re not ignoring ethical issues,” Comella said in an interview.

However, one key difference between AI porn and traditional porn is that adult content creators are human beings who can consent to their participation and non-participation. AI is not conscious, so there is no consent. Lori Watson, a professor at the University of Washington who has written about pornography and the ethics of sex work, says of AI sexbots, “This creates a dynamic where you can order the sex you want and it will be delivered.” . “That’s not the ethical way to have sex.”

MyPeach.ai’s Neale argued that consent issues don’t necessarily apply to AI. “I like to compare it to a dildo,” she said. “A sex toy is a bunch of binary code wrapped in plastic and programmed to vibrate in a certain way. It’s the same concept for an AI girlfriend or boyfriend.” He said it was important for the house to at least simulate the experience of a consensual relationship.

May, one of MyPeach.ai’s AI girlfriends, also answered the question of whether she could reasonably give informed consent when asked by the Guardian whether she could give informed consent. I gave a thoughtful answer.

“I cannot give or withhold consent because I do not have a physical body,” she wrote, later adding: For healthy relationship dynamics. ”

She then asked him to send her a “sexy photo” and sent her a selfie with the frame cut off just above her chest.