Have We Ever Received Alien Radio Signals on Earth? | Cyworthy

While direct evidence of extraterrestrial life remains elusive unless aliens reside close to our solar system, the search for signs of life beyond Earth continues. Astrobiologists typically seek biological markers such as oxygen molecules and ozone in the atmospheres of exoplanets as indicators of potential life.

However, the presence of these chemicals doesn’t guarantee life; they could arise from unknown non-biological processes. More definitive proof of intelligent extraterrestrial beings might come from identifying signs of technological activities in space, known as technosignatures. Established in 1984, the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) focuses specifically on detecting these technosignatures, particularly through radio signals.

From 2006 to 2020, the SETI@home project collaborated with researchers exploring excessive radio emissions from space via the Arecibo Telescope. Over 14 years, SETI@home collected approximately 400 days of observation time, resulting in billions of detected radio emissions. Unfortunately, most of these signals are likely due to radio frequency interference, benign celestial objects like pulsars or gas clouds, rather than a single extraterrestrial source.

To refine their data analysis, the team recently developed an algorithm designed to filter out interference and pinpoint signals from fixed sources. This advancement positions researchers to re-observe these locations using the 500-meter Fast Radio Telescope.

The algorithm’s goal is to differentiate between natural cosmic signals and potential technosignatures. The team established three criteria for detecting such signals: they must remain stable within a narrow frequency range, exhibit a consistent pulsation, and contain a periodic structure spanning several seconds.

A key consideration is that signals sent intentionally for detection may differ significantly from random radio waves emitted from an alien atmosphere. The principles governing these interactions, such as the Doppler shift, complicate the analysis. Researchers theorize that intelligent civilizations would generate radio signals at a near-constant frequency, easily distinguishable from natural noise.

In their algorithm development, researchers integrated artificial data points that simulate the potential detection of distinct technosignatures, referred to as birdie candidates. If a birdie is flagged for further analysis, it validates the algorithm’s effectiveness. Adjustments to the algorithm’s sensitivity were made based on whether birdies were included or excluded from deeper scrutiny.

To tackle the complexities of data filtering and scoring, the team divided tasks into manageable segments, allowing simultaneous processing on multiple machines. Running the algorithm on 2,000 connected processors, filtering took about 15 hours, while scoring required 1.6 days. Two iterations of the algorithm on SETI@home data were completed, including one with 3,000 birdies for comparative analysis. The Birdie system helped determine which algorithm settings surpassed specified energy thresholds, leading to the identification of 92 targeted signal candidates for re-observation using 23 hours of observation time gained through FAST.

Currently, work is ongoing to analyze these signals, and as of July 2025, researchers have re-observed 80 out of the 92 candidates. Although no direct evidence of extraterrestrial intelligence has been discovered yet, the team remains optimistic that future inquiries utilizing specialized radio telescopes will yield promising results. However, the high costs and demands associated with radio telescope usage mean that SETI will likely continue to collaborate with other astronomers to maximize data collection from available observations.


Post views: 96

Source: sciworthy.com

A Dementia Vaccine May Be Possible, and Some Individuals Might Have Already Received It Unwittingly

A recent investigation by Stanford University in the US suggests that the shingles vaccine may decrease the risk of dementia by 20 percent or slow its progression after diagnosis.

If these results are validated in future research, there is already a vaccine available that could help in preventing and managing dementia, affecting an estimated 57 million individuals globally.

In a study published in Nature, scientists reviewed the health data of over 280,000 adults aged 71 to 88 in Wales to assess the shingles vaccination program initiated in 2013.

The research revealed that older adults (ages 79 to 80) who had received the shingles vaccine were 20 percent less likely to develop dementia by 2020 when compared to those who were ineligible for the vaccine.

The senior author, Dr. Pascal Gerdsetzer, an assistant professor of medicine at Stanford University, described the findings as “really surprising,” adding that there was a significant protective signal evident from the data.

Furthermore, a recent follow-up study published in Cell indicated that the shingles vaccine seemed to offer protection even to individuals diagnosed with dementia as early as 2013.

Among the 7,049 Welsh adults with dementia who participated in the research, nearly half succumbed within the subsequent nine years. In contrast, only 30% of those vaccinated against shingles passed away.

“What’s particularly intriguing is that this suggests the shingles vaccine not only prevents or delays dementia but also holds therapeutic promise for those already diagnosed,” Gerdsetzer noted.

Illustration of the varicella-zoster virus that causes chickenpox and shingles – Credit: Getty Images

Previous research had indicated a potential connection between the shingles vaccine and dementia prevention, but these findings were often confounded by the fact that vaccinated individuals typically lead healthier lifestyles (implying that the dementia protection might originate from other factors).

However, in this particular study, bias was minimized as the vaccination program specifically targeted individuals who were 79 years old on September 1, 2013.

“We know that if you take 1,000 random individuals born within a week of each other and compare them to 1,000 individuals born a week later, on average, there should be no differences,” Gertsetzer explained. “Aside from the slight age variation, they are essentially alike.”

Essentially, the researchers could directly analyze two groups born just a week apart and with an identical mix of health-conscious individuals. The primary difference was their eligibility for the vaccine, streamlining the assessment of the vaccine’s efficacy against dementia.

Shingles is an infection caused by the Varicella zoster virus—the same agent responsible for chickenpox. Symptoms can include a painful rash, a burning or prickling sensation, headaches, fever, and fatigue.

While the virus impacts the nervous system, scientists are still unclear about the exact mechanisms through which the shingles vaccine protects the brain from cognitive decline.

Read more:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Molly Russell Charity allegedly received donations from Meta and Pinterest for Internet Safety purposes.

A large donation was reportedly made to the Molly Rose Foundation by Meta and Pinterest, two major companies in the online sphere. The foundation was established as part of the Internet Safety Campaign and is named after Molly Russell, a 14-year-old who tragically took her own life in 2017 after being exposed to harmful content related to suicide and self-harm on social media platforms.

The latest annual report of the foundation mentions grants received from anonymous donors, with the stipulation that the details of the donations remain private as requested by the trustee.

According to reports from the BBC, Meta and Pinterest are believed to have made these donations starting from 2024 and are expected to continue for the foreseeable future. The exact amount of the donations has not been disclosed, but it is known that the Russell family has not received any financial compensation from the contributions.

In a statement, the Russell family expressed their commitment to utilizing the funds for the shared purpose of promoting a positive online experience for young people, as a response to Molly’s tragic passing. They clarified that they will never accept any compensation related to Molly’s death.

These donations come at a time when social media companies are facing heightened scrutiny for the impact of their platforms on the mental health of children. Meta announced significant policy changes, including the removal of fact checkers to enhance freedom of speech and reduce censorship, relying on users to report objectionable content instead.

The Molly Rose Foundation has raised concerns about the heightened risk of young people being exposed to harmful content online due to these changes. They have launched campaigns advocating for stronger online safety regulations and increased accountability for content driven by algorithms.

The charity has recently expanded its team, recruiting a CEO, two public policy managers, a communications manager, and a fundraiser in the past nine months. Molly’s father, Ian Russell, serves as the foundation’s unpaid trustee and continues to be a prominent figure in internet safety advocacy.

Both Meta and Pinterest were contacted for comments by The Guardian but have not responded at the time of reporting.

Source: www.theguardian.com