Unveiling the Hidden Life of Giant Viruses: Are They More Alive Than We Realize?

Mimivirus Illustration

Illustration of Mimivirus: A Giant Virus Infecting Amoebae

Credit: Science Photo Library / Alamy

Viruses exploit host cell machinery to produce proteins, with certain large viruses encoding essential components within their genomes to instruct host cells to generate viral proteins. This phenomenon emphasizes how giant viruses challenge the distinction between living and nonliving entities.

Since the discovery of the mimivirus in Bradford, England in 2003, which infects amoebas, biologists have increasingly focused on these giant viruses. Some exhibit sizes larger than typical bacteria, complex shapes, and possess numerous genes.

Among these genes are those that code for components involved in translation—the biological process that turns genetic information into proteins. In cellular biology, translation occurs through ribosomes, initiated by molecular assemblies known as initiation complexes.

To investigate whether giant viruses possess a similar system, Max Fells and his team from Harvard Medical School explored the dynamics within infected amoebas and the manipulations by mimivirus post-infection.

The researchers isolated ribosomes from infected cells and identified the viral proteins linked to them. “This was our initial clue that these might be the elements we were seeking,” said Fells.

Subsequently, they knocked out the gene responsible for the viral complex by substituting it with a modified DNA sequence, resulting in a virus that could not synthesize the corresponding protein. This intervention decreased virus production by up to 100,000-fold and severely inhibited the formation of new infectious particles.

These findings collectively indicate that during an infection, viral complexes potentially redirect the protein synthesis machinery of the host to significantly boost the production of viral structural proteins, even under extreme conditions like nutrient scarcity and oxidative stress, which typically hinder protein synthesis in host cells.

This discovery introduces a profound evolutionary inquiry: how did these viruses acquire such capabilities? Some researchers propose that giant viruses may descend from ancient cellular life forms, while others suggest they evolved from typical viruses through gene acquisition from their hosts.

“Giant viruses have acquired a diverse array of cellular machinery from their eukaryotic hosts over evolutionary time,” stated Frank Aylward from Virginia Tech, who was not part of the study. Genetic exchange can occur during viral infection, allowing natural selection to favor advantageous genes over extended evolutionary periods.

Many of the largest viruses dominate the internal environment of single-celled organisms, which presents more variability than the relatively stable environments of multicellular hosts. Consequently, this flexible control over protein synthesis may confer a significant evolutionary advantage, Aylward noted.

This research also raises critical questions. The mimivirus genome comprises approximately 1,000 proteins, the majority of which remain functionally enigmatic. It remains unclear how these viruses intricately control protein production throughout a single infection cycle.

“Viruses have traditionally been regarded as passive participants in the evolution of living systems,” stated Hiroyuki Ogata from Kyoto University, Japan. “This study demonstrates that giant viruses can reconfigure molecular systems that are fundamental across the spectrum of life.”

Topics:

This rewritten content is optimized for SEO with relevant keywords while maintaining the original HTML tags and structure.

Source: www.newscientist.com

Google’s Gemini 3 Model Keeps AI Buzz Alive – For the Time Being

Gemini 3 is Google’s latest AI model

VCG (via Getty Images)

Google’s newest chatbot, Gemini 3, has shown remarkable advancement on various benchmarks aimed at evaluating AI progress, according to the company. While these accomplishments may mitigate concerns about a potential AI bubble for the time being, it’s uncertain how effectively these scores reflect real-world performance.

Moreover, the ongoing issues of factual inaccuracies and problematic illusions that are often present in large-scale language models remain unaddressed, particularly in scenarios where accuracy is critical.

In a blog post announcing the new model, Google leaders Sundar Pichai, Demis Hassabis, and Koray Kavukcuoglu stated that Gemini 3 possesses “PhD-level reasoning,” a term also used by competitor OpenAI during the release of its GPT-5 model. They presented scores from several assessments aimed at measuring “graduate-level” knowledge, such as Humanity’s Last Exam, comprising 2500 research-oriented questions from fields like mathematics, science, and humanities. Gemini 3 achieved a score of 37.5 percent on this exam, surpassing the previous record held by OpenAI’s GPT-5, which scored 26.5 percent.

Such improvements could indicate that the model has developed enhanced capabilities in certain areas. However, Luc Rocher suggests caution in interpreting these outcomes. “If a model increases its score from 80 percent to 90 percent on a benchmark, what does that represent? Does it mean the model was 80 percent PhD-level and is now 90 percent? This is quite difficult to ascertain,” he remarks. “It’s challenging to quantify whether an AI model demonstrates inference, as that concept is highly subjective.”

Benchmark tests come with numerous limitations, including the requirement for single answers or multiple-choice responses that do not necessitate demonstrating how the model operates. “It’s straightforward to evaluate models using multiple-choice questions,” notes Roche. “Yet in real-world scenarios—like visiting a doctor—you are not assessed with multiple-choice questions. Likewise, a lawyer does not provide legal counsel through pick-and-choose answers.” There’s also the risk that responses to such tests could be included in the training data of the AI models being assessed, essentially allowing for cheating.

The ultimate evaluation of whether Gemini 3 and its advanced AI models justify the massive investments being made by companies like Google and OpenAI in AI data centers hinges on user experience and the perceived trustworthiness of these tools, according to Roscher.

Google asserts that enhancements to the model will assist users in developing software, managing emails, and analyzing documents more effectively. The company also emphasizes that it will enhance Google searches, providing AI-generated results alongside graphics and simulations.

Perhaps the most significant advancement, as articulated by Adam Mahdi from Oxford University, is the autonomous coding capabilities facilitated by AI tools, a technique known as agent coding. “We might be approaching the limits of what traditional chatbots can achieve, and it is here that the true advantages of Gemini 3 Pro come into play. [the standard version of Gemini 3] It’s likely that it won’t be used for everyday conversations, but rather for more intricate and potentially agent-based workflows,” he explains.

Here are some initial reactions online: People admire Gemini’s impressive coding and reasoning skills. However, as is typical with new model releases, some users pointed out failures in seemingly simple tasks like drawing an arrow or a straightforward visual reasoning challenge.

Google recognizes in Gemini 3’s technical specifications that the model continues to experience hallucinations at a rate similar to other major AI models and sometimes disseminates inaccuracies. This lack of progress is a significant concern, according to Artur Davila Garces from City St George’s, University of London. “The challenge lies in the fact that AI companies have been striving to minimize hallucinations for over two years, yet even one severely misleading hallucination can irreparably damage trust in the system,” he warns.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Exploring the Alive and Vibrant Japanese Gaming Scene at Tokyo Game Show | Games

TThe Tokyo Game Show will take place at Makuhari Messe. Makuhari Messe consists of spacious halls situated in a suburban complex about 45 minutes east of central Tokyo. The event occurs in late September and is usually accompanied by extreme heat or heavy rain, leading to humid and crowded conditions. Despite these challenges, I have always had an interest in TGS. My first experience attending was in 2008, and the memories of playing games in a crowded hall with minimal understanding of the surroundings evoke a sense of nostalgia.

Last Friday in Tokyo, many individuals, including myself, felt nostalgic as the event hall was filled with characters and series from 15 years ago. Games like Silent Hill 2 at the Konami Stand and the return of Solid Snake in the Metal Gear Solid: Snake Eater remake sparked memories. Popular titles like Monster Hunter from Capcom, Sony’s showcase of the PlayStation 5 Pro, and Sega’s presence with upcoming games also added to the nostalgic atmosphere. Japanese-made Astro Bots and other new games were on display, reflecting the greatness of the industry.

Alongside these prominent displays, new games like Metaphor: ReFantazio and Like a Dragon: Pirate Rokuza in Hawaiian series captivated the audience. Developers of Palworld faced challenges amidst a lawsuit from Nintendo for alleged copyright infringement. The event also featured Dragon Ball: Sparking Zero, Infinity Nikki, and elaborate presentations from Paper Games, offering a variety of experiences to attendees.

Participants at last week’s Tokyo Game Show. Photo: Tomohiro Osumi/Getty Images

Exploring the diverse offerings, it became evident that indie games from around the world were prominently featured this year, showcasing a blend of creativity and innovation not seen a decade ago. Titles like Rolling Macho: Tumble to Earth from Serial Games offered unique gameplay experiences, reflecting the evolving landscape of the gaming industry.

Reflecting on my time at TGS, I was reassured that Japanese games, reminiscent of my childhood, were thriving. With new releases like Metaphor: ReFantazio from Studio Zero capturing attention, the event highlighted the enduring appeal of Japanese game development.

What to Play

Apartment Story, a Sims-style life management game. Photo: Blue Rider Interactive

One standout experience was playing Apartment Story, a Sims-like game that immerses players in the mundane life of a gaming journalist, offering a unique and intimate gaming experience worth exploring.

Available: Computer
Estimated play time: 1-2 hours, multiple playthroughs possible

What to Read

“Assassin’s Creed Shadows” features a black samurai as the main character. Photo: Ubisoft
  • Ubisoft’s Assassin’s Creed Shadows has been delayed, sparking controversy and reflections on the gaming industry’s challenges. The removal of The Simpsons: Tapped Out from the app store and insights into the Yakuza series further highlight the evolving landscape of gaming.

What to Click

Question Block

Plug and play…steam deck. Photo: Valve

“Is the Valve Steam Deck suitable for plug-and-play gamers like myself? How does its performance compare to traditional PC gaming?”

The Valve Steam Deck offers a portable PC gaming experience at an accessible price point, making it a viable option for gamers seeking convenience. While some games may require minor adjustments for optimal performance, most titles are optimized for the Steam Deck, ensuring a hassle-free gaming experience. Additionally, Steam offers a hassle-free refund policy for games that do not run smoothly on the device, providing peace of mind to users.

If you have any questions or feedback, feel free to reach out to us at pushbuttons@theguardian.com.

Source: www.theguardian.com

NASA makes “Christmas tree clusters” come alive

The Christmas Tree Cluster, NGC 2264, is a young star cluster in the Milky Way galaxy, about 2,500 light-years from Earth. Enhanced by specific color selection and rotation, this composite image depicts these stars of varying sizes as part of a cosmic Christmas tree. Credit: X-ray: NASA/CXC/SAO. Optics: TA Rector (NRAO/AUI/NSF and NOIRLab/NSF/AURA) and BA Wolpa (NOIRLab/NSF/AURA). Infrared: NASA/NSF/IPAC/CalTech/University of Massachusetts. Image processing: NASA/CXC/SAO/L.Frattare & J. Major

NGC 2264, also known as the “Christmas Tree Cluster,” milky way depicted with a new enhanced image to resemble a cosmic Christmas tree.

  • NGC 2264 is a cluster of young stars that has been colored and rotated to emphasize its nickname, the “Christmas Tree Cluster.”
  • This composite image includes X-rays from Chandra (blue and white), optical data from WIYN (green gas), and infrared data from 2MASS (white star).
  • The stars in this cluster are between 1 and 5 million years old, while the Sun is 5 billion years old.
  • Young stars are volatile and produce strong flares of X-rays and other types of light, but not in the coordinated way shown in the animation.

A cosmic Christmas tree: NGC 2264’s starscape

This new image of NGC 2264, also known as the “Christmas Tree Cluster,” shows the shape of a cosmic tree with a glow of starlight. In fact, NGC 2264 is a cluster of young stars, about 1 million to 5 million years old, located in the Milky Way about 2,500 light-years from Earth. The stars in NGC 2264 are smaller and larger than the Sun, ranging from those with masses less than a tenth of the Sun’s mass to those containing about 7 solar masses.

Festive composite image: color and rotation

This new composite image enhances the resemblance of a Christmas tree through color and rotation choices. The blue and white light (flashing in the animated version, see video below) is a young star that emits X-rays, and the X-rays are detected. NASAChandra X-ray Observatory. Optical data from his National Science Foundation-supported WIYN 0.9-meter telescope at Kitt Peak shows gas nebulae in green star clusters that correspond to the “pine needles” of trees. Finally, the infrared data from the Two Micron All Sky Survey shows foreground and background stars as white. The image has been rotated 160 degrees clockwise from astronomers’ standard north-up orientation, so the tops of the trees appear to be toward the top of the image.

This composite image shows a Christmas tree cluster. The blue and white light (blinking in the animated version of this image) is her X-ray-emitting young star detected by NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory. Optical data from the National Science Foundation’s WIYN 0.9-meter telescope at Kitt Peak shows gas in the nebula in green, corresponding to the “pine needles” of trees, and infrared data from the 2-micron all-sky survey shows foreground and background shows the stars. White. The image has been rotated about 160 degrees clockwise with astronomers’ standard of north at the top, so the tops of the trees appear to be near the top of the image.

Star dynamics and observation techniques

Young stars like NGC 2264 are highly volatile, causing strong flares in X-rays and other types of fluctuations seen in different wavelengths of light. However, the coordinated blinking variation shown in this animation was done artificially to emphasize the position of the star seen in the X-rays and to emphasize the resemblance of this object to a Christmas tree. . In reality, the changes in the stars are not synchronized.

The fluctuations observed by Chandra and other telescopes are caused by several different processes. Some of these are associated with activity involving magnetic fields, such as flares like those experienced by the Sun (but much more powerful), and hot spots and spots on the star’s surface that move in and out of view as the star rotates. dark areas etc. Other possibilities include changes in the thickness of the gas obscuring the star, and changes in the amount of material falling onto the star from the surrounding gas disk.

NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center manages the Chandra program. The Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory’s Chandra X-ray Center manages scientific operations from Cambridge, Massachusetts and flight operations from Burlington, Massachusetts.

Source: scitechdaily.com