EU Carbon Border Tax: What It Means for Global Emissions Reduction by 2026

New Import Duties for Non-EU Steel

Credit: Yusuf Aslan / Alamy

The European Union is poised to implement carbon tariffs starting January 1, marking a significant shift in international climate policy. This initiative targets countries lagging in carbon emissions reductions, introducing financial penalties that will aim to hold companies accountable for their environmental impact.

Countries affected by these carbon taxes are expressing discontent, as tensions rise around the EU’s carbon border tariffs, officially labeled under the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. Anticipate trade disputes, but these taxes are expected to persist, with analysts like Ellie Belton from E3G predicting global adoption of similar measures.

Belton notes, “We can foresee carbon border adjustment mechanisms emerging globally.” The UK is set to implement its version by 2027, with countries such as Australia, Canada, and Taiwan also contemplating the adoption of carbon tariffs.

The EU’s carbon border tax extends the existing carbon pricing framework established in 2005. Since then, EU industries with high carbon emissions have been subject to costs associated with carbon allowances under the emissions trading system. Currently, the carbon price stands at approximately 76 euros per tonne of CO2.

This pricing disparity means EU steel producers face higher costs compared to their counterparts in nations without carbon pricing. The newly introduced tariffs strive to level the playing field, adjusting import tariffs to align with internal EU carbon prices.

For countries already employing carbon pricing, the EU will impose only the price difference on imports. Besides steel, other industries affected by border taxes include iron, aluminum, cement, fertilizer, hydrogen, and electricity.

The primary goal is to prevent carbon leakage, where industries relocate to jurisdictions with less stringent environmental regulations. “The EU insists on no exemptions, as these would create pollution havens,” Belton emphasizes.

Additionally, this policy aims to encourage global efforts in reducing carbon emissions. Countries like Brazil and Türkiye have already implemented their own carbon pricing mechanisms in response to the EU’s initiative.

In 2023, the EU finalized plans for the carbon border adjustment mechanism, launching a pilot scheme in October that required businesses to declare emissions. Effective January 1, companies will begin accruing charges, gradually increasing until full implementation by 2034.

British firms are anticipated to avoid taxation under the UK’s own carbon border adjustment mechanism as negotiations continue to ensure compatibility with EU regulations.

Ideally, a unified carbon border adjustment system across nations would enhance economic influence and comparative power in global forums. However, Belton foresees a fragmented landscape of varied carbon pricing approaches worldwide.

Source: www.newscientist.com

Are Flesh-Eating Parasites Approaching the U.S. Border? Here’s What You Need to Know.

In September, Mexican officials confirmed an outbreak of the lethal flesh-eating parasite in Nuevo Leon, located less than 70 miles (113 kilometers) from the Texas border.

The outbreak was identified in an 8-month-old cow along the busy Monterrey to Laredo highway. Cocliomia hominivorax – the New World screwworm – has resurfaced for the first time in decades, threatening its eradication status achieved in the United States over fifty years ago.

This discovery raised concerns among U.S. ranchers and veterinarians who vividly recall the destruction this voracious insect once wreaked. The screwworm fly, a metallic blue-gray, appears relatively ordinary until its larvae begin to burrow into the living flesh of animals.

“The adults resemble the blowflies commonly found in my lab in North Carolina,” remarks Professor Max Scott, an entomologist at North Carolina State University who has dedicated his career to pest research. “The difference is that this blowfly is an obligate parasite. The female must lay her eggs in a living host.”

Within hours of being laid in a wound or natural opening, the eggs hatch into maggots that burrow deep into the tissue. After several days of feeding, the larvae drop to the ground and pupate, often leaving the host deformed or dead.

Each female can lay hundreds of eggs, and untreated infestations often attract other species of flies, exacerbating the host’s decline.

In livestock, screwworms can result in significant weight loss, skin damage, and even fatalities, representing a multibillion-dollar challenge for the livestock industry in South America.

A Terrible Past

The New World screwworm once plagued regions in the southern United States, Mexico, and the Caribbean. It wasn’t until the mid-20th century that an unexpected mix of genetics, radiation, and air transport helped regain control over the species.

Post-World War II, scientists at the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) pioneered germ-free insect technology, a groundbreaking method for genetic control. The approach was both simple and radical—breed millions of screwworm flies in captivity, sterilize them using gamma rays, and release them into the wild.

Females mate only once, so even if they pair with a sterile male, they won’t produce offspring, leading to a population collapse.

In the 1950s, experiments on Curaçao confirmed the method’s effectiveness. By the early 1960s, screwworms had been eradicated from Florida. The initiative spread west and south, ultimately eliminating the fly from the continental United States, Mexico, and much of Central America by the early 2000s.

The eradication campaign was costly, reportedly exceeding $750 million. However, it saved the livestock industry billions in losses annually and allowed U.S. cattle production to thrive in the following years.

A small production facility in Panama, jointly managed by the U.S. and Panamanian governments, maintained permanent barriers, releasing 100 million sterile flies weekly along the Panama-Colombia border and regularly developing new strains for longevity.

This system functioned effectively for two decades until it faltered. By 2023, infection cases began to re-emerge in Panama. Within two years, the parasite spread to Costa Rica, Nicaragua, and Honduras, now reaching northern Mexico.

New World screwworm larvae feed on infected animal wounds for about seven days, then fall to the ground, burrow into the soil, and pupate. – Credit: COPEG

What Went Wrong?

The specific reasons behind the barrier’s collapse remain unclear, but Scott noted “warning signs indicating trouble along the border.”

Farmers failing to adhere to protocols when transporting livestock may have further facilitated the spread of infection, explaining the surge in cases beyond the natural movement of fly populations.

Scott pointed out that the Panama facility is currently overburdened, producing around 110 million sterile flies weekly. In contrast, during the initial eradication efforts in Mexico, local facilities generated between 500 million and 700 million units weekly. “We needed that volume,” he noted.

This shortfall means an insufficient supply of sterile flies to manage the ongoing outbreak.

Read More:

The Enemy at the Gate

As of now, there is no evidence that the screwworms have crossed into the U.S. The USDA has deployed approximately 8,000 traps in Texas, Arizona, and New Mexico but has not detected any flies. Nevertheless, vigilance is high.

“The risks are substantial,” Scott cautions. “The best chance to curb the outbreak was further south, near the Isthmus of Tehuantepec. Reports of cases further north complicate containment given the current production capacities.”

In response, the U.S. government initiated a “five-pillar plan,” which includes constructing two new fly dispersal facilities in Texas. One facility at Moore Air Force Base can spray 100 million sterile flies weekly, while plans for a larger production plant in southern Texas aim to triple that capacity.

The USDA is also investing $100 million into innovative pest control technologies, exploring options from electron beam and X-ray sterilization to genetically modified flies.

A significant resurgence of screwworms could be catastrophic for U.S. livestock producers. An outbreak may incur billions in animal losses, quarantines, and trade restrictions. When the parasite re-emerged in Florida in 2016 from Caribbean-imported deer, it infected 145 animals, taking nearly a year to eradicate.

Human infections are rare but can be severe. The parasite’s scientific name, Cocliomia hominivorax, translates to “man-eating fly.” Most cases affect travelers to infested regions, leading to infections from wounds and nasal passages.

“This is not a major public health issue,” Scott explained. “However, caution is advised when visiting affected areas.”

The bulges on the larva’s body are the origin of the name “screw maggot.” – Credit: USDA Agricultural Research Service

Modern Genetic Upgrades

Scott believes that the old sterile fly method remains viable, especially when enhanced by new biotechnology. His lab at North Carolina State University has spent years developing genetically engineered screwworm strains that produce only males, significantly increasing efficiency.

Traditional sterile insect techniques require releasing both males and females, resulting in many males mating with sterile females.

This means that very high doses of radiation are needed to fully sterilize females, Scott noted. In contrast, his team’s method yields only males. They can then focus on sterilizing these males specifically, allowing researchers to maintain a higher quantity of healthier flies unlikely to reproduce.

These male-only stocks were field-tested in Panama in 2018 but were not deployed because existing methods were deemed sufficient. As the parasite moves northward, regulatory approval for genetically modified screwworms might become essential.

Moreover, researchers are investigating “gene drive systems” utilizing CRISPR technology to bias genetics, ensuring that most offspring carry infertile or male-only genes. In theory, this could drastically reduce the number of flies needed for suppression.

“We hope funding will be available to develop more effective technologies,” Scott stated. “The goal is to reduce releases from 100 million sterile flies to potentially just 10 million. This would make genetic control far more feasible.”

For the time being, strategies remain focused on aerial dispersal, targeted capture, and cross-border collaboration. Yet, scientists are increasingly concerned about the screwworm’s capability to migrate northward faster than anticipated.

“Given the current fly population, we sincerely hope to prevent them from entering the United States,” Scott warned. “But uncertainties remain.”

At present, the border remains intact. With each new case emerging towards the north, the focus shifts from whether the screwworms will invade the U.S. to whether they will be prepared upon their arrival.

Read More:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

US Border Patrol Collects DNA from Thousands of American Citizens, Data Reveals

In March 2021, a 25-year-old American citizen arrived at Chicago’s Midway Airport and was detained by US Border Patrol agents. According to a recent report, the individual underwent a cheek swab for DNA collection. This person was later identified by state authorities, and their DNA was entered into the FBI’s genetic database, all without any criminal charges being filed.

This 25-year-old is among roughly 2,000 US citizens whose DNA was gathered and forwarded to the FBI by the Department of Homeland Security between 2020 and 2024, as reported by Georgetown’s Privacy and Technology Center. The report highlights that even some 14-year-old US citizens had their DNA collected by Customs and Border Protection (CBP) officials.

“We have witnessed a significant breach of privacy,” stated Stevie Gloverson, director of research and advocacy at Georgetown’s Privacy Center. “We contend that the absence of oversight on DHS’s collection powers renders this program unconstitutional and a violation of the Fourth Amendment.”

When immigration officials collect DNA to share it with the FBI, it is stored in the Combined DNA Index System (Codis), which is utilized nationwide by various law enforcement agencies to identify crime suspects. A 2024 report also revealed that CBP collects DNA data from the Privacy and Technology Center in Georgetown. Additionally, the data indicates that DNA was collected and shared from immigrant children, with initial estimates suggesting that approximately 133,000 teens and children have had their sensitive genetic information uploaded to this federal criminal database for permanent retention.

The recent CBP document specifically outlines the number of US citizens from whom genetic samples were collected at various entry points, including significant airports. The agency gathered data on the ages of individuals whose DNA was obtained by border agents as well as any charges associated with them. Like the 25-year-old, around 40 US citizens had their DNA collected and forwarded to the FBI, including six minors.

Under current regulations, CBP is authorized to gather DNA from all individuals, regardless of citizenship status or criminal background.

However, the law does not permit Border Patrol agents to collect DNA samples from US citizens merely for being detained. Yet, recent disclosures indicate that CBP lacks a system to verify whether there is a legal basis for collecting personal DNA.

In some atypical instances, US citizens had DNA collected for minor infractions like “failure to declare” items. In at least two documented cases, citizens were subjected to DNA swabbing, with CBP agents merely noting the accusation as “immigration officer testing.”

“This is data from CBP’s own management,” Gloverson pointed out. “What the documentation reveals is alarming. Afterward, CBP agents are isolating US citizens and swabbing their mouths without justification.”

No formal federal charges have been filed in approximately 865 of the roughly 2,000 cases of US citizens whose DNA was collected by CBP, indicating, according to Gloverson, that no legal cases have been presented before an independent authority, such as a judge.

Skip past newsletter promotions

“Many of these individuals do not go before a judge to assess the legality of their detention and arrest,” she remarked.

DNA records can disclose highly sensitive information, such as genetic relationships and lineage, regardless of an individual’s citizenship status. Information found in the criminal database, utilized for criminal investigations, could subject individuals to scrutiny that may not otherwise occur, Gloverson warned.

“If you believe your citizenship guards you against authoritarian measures, this situation is clear evidence that it does not,” she concluded.

Source: www.theguardian.com

UK Border Officials Utilize AI to Assess Ages of Child Asylum Seekers

Officials will employ artificial intelligence to assist in estimating the age of asylum seekers who claim to be minors.

Immigration Minister Angela Eagle stated on Tuesday that the government will pilot technology designed to assess a person’s age based on facial characteristics.

This initiative is the latest effort aimed at helping the Labor Minister leverage AI to address public service issues without incurring significant expenses.

The announcement coincided with the public release of a report by David Bolt, the Chief Inspector of Borders and Immigration. A crucial report indicated efforts to estimate the age of new arrivals.

Eagle mentioned in a formal statement to Parliament: “We believe the most economically feasible approach is likely to involve estimating age based on facial analysis. This technology can provide age estimates with known accuracy for individuals whose age is disputed or uncertain, drawing from millions of verifiable images.”

“In cases where it’s ambiguous whether the individual undergoing age assessment is over 18 or not claiming to be a minor, facial age estimation offers a potentially swift and straightforward method to validate judgments against the technology’s estimates.”

Eagle is launching a pilot program to evaluate the technology, aiming for its integration into official age verification processes by next year.

John Lewis announced earlier this year that it will be the first UK retailer to facilitate online knife sales using facial age estimation technology.

The Home Office has previously utilized AI in other sectors, such as identifying fraudulent marriages. However, this tool has faced criticism for disproportionately targeting specific nationalities.

Although there are concerns that AI tools may intensify biases in governmental decision-making, the minister is exploring additional applications. Science and Technology Secretary Peter Kyle announced a partnership with OpenAI, the organization behind ChatGPT, to investigate AI deployment in areas like justice, safety, and education.

Bolt expressed that the mental health of young asylum seekers has deteriorated due to failings in the age verification system, especially in Dover, where the influx of small boats is processed.

Skip past newsletter promotions

“Many concerns raised over the past decade regarding policy and practices remain unresolved,” Bolt cautioned, emphasizing that the challenging conditions at the Dover processing facility could hinder accurate age assessments.

He added: “I have heard accounts of young individuals who felt distrustful and disheartened in their encounters with Home Office officials, where hope has faded and their mental well-being is suffering.”

His remarks echo a report from the Refugee Council, indicating that at least 1,300 children have been mistakenly identified as adults over an 18-month period.

Last month, scholars from the London School of Economics and the University of Bedfordshire suggested that the Home Office should be stripped of its authority to make decisions regarding lonely asylum seekers.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Vapor-Sensing Drug Detector Tested at the US-Mexico Border

The vapor detector has the ability to detect traces of fentanyl and other substances in the air.

Elizabeth Dennis/Pacific Northwest National Laboratory

The U.S. Customs and Border Protection Agency is currently evaluating technology that can detect illegal substances in the air without any physical contact. This device aims to screen border items within seconds, targeting the trafficking of drugs like fentanyl, which is a major factor in the U.S. opioid crisis.

Detecting drugs and explosive materials is challenging due to the limited number of molecules they release into the air, which is already crowded with various vapors. To tackle this issue, Robert Ewing and his team at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) have dedicated over a decade to developing an advanced system known as VaporID. This system can accurately identify certain substances within a range of 0.6 to 2.4 meters at an astonishing sensitivity, comparable to locating a single coin amidst 17 million stacked pennies equivalent to the height of Mount Everest.

Government researchers achieved this by allowing molecules to interact longer, increasing the chances of detectable chemical reactions. Most devices for detecting unknown substances only provide a reaction time of milliseconds, Ewing stated. “We designed an atmospheric flow tube that allows for a reaction time of 2-3 seconds, enhancing sensitivity by three orders of magnitude.”

The technology is currently implemented in an 18-kilogram commercial device that fits in the size of a microwave. This compact machine, developed by Bayspec, is indeed lighter than their previous versions, which weighed over 100 kilograms but were less sensitive than the PNNL prototype, which is about the size of a small fridge. Nevertheless, it claims to be “more accurate and sensitive than a canine detector,” according to William Yang, CEO of Bayspec.

In October 2024, Bayspec and PNNL tested the portable device at a Customs and Border Protection facility in Nogales, Arizona. In separate trials, researchers swabbed the surfaces of seized tablets and then heated the swabs to generate steam for detection. “Both methods yielded strong and reliable results,” stated Christian Thoma from Bayspec.

The prototype is still under evaluation and requires further scientific data review, as noted by a spokesperson from CBP.

Alex Krotulski from the Center for Forensic Research and Education, a nonprofit based in Pennsylvania, expressed caution, stating, “We have seen numerous devices that have promised much but have often disappointed, and we remain skeptical until thorough research proves their efficacy.”

Current portable detection techniques, including x-ray technology, already exist for uncovering concealed drugs. Independent consultant Richard Crocombe acknowledged the new tool as a “valuable addition to existing techniques,” but cautioned that it “doesn’t fulfill every requirement.” For instance, a CBP representative mentioned that while the device could expedite drug testing in field labs, new innovations would necessitate analysis by trained chemists.

Concerns about false positives are also prevalent, as noted by Joseph Palamar at New York University. A past study indicated that a majority of U.S. banknotes carry contamination. “If you are near someone using fentanyl, a positive result can occur due to residual traces on their clothing or shoes, leading to potential wrongful detainment of innocent individuals,” he added, as explained by Chelsea Schauber from UCLA.

Intercepting drugs before they reach the country is merely one component of a comprehensive strategy required to tackle the opioid crisis, says Schauber. This broader effort demands robust public health resources, healthcare access, and extensive treatment alternatives. “Currently, these supports are being reduced under the Trump administration,” she noted. “To genuinely save lives, we need to make effective, evidence-based treatments more accessible than illicit substances,” Schober emphasized.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

US Government Trials New Vaporization Technology at Border Checkpoints

The steam detector can identify traces of fentanyl and other substances in the air

Elizabeth Denis/Pacific Northwest National Institute

The U.S. Customs and Border Protection Agency is evaluating technology capable of detecting illegal substances in the air without any physical contact. This device aims to screen border objects quickly to combat the trafficking of drugs like fentanyl, a major contributor to the U.S. opioid crisis.

Detecting drugs and explosive compounds poses a challenge due to their release of relatively few molecules into the already vapor-laden air. To tackle this issue, the U.S. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL) has spent over a decade developing an advanced system known as VaporID. This system can accurately identify certain substances from distances of 0.6 to 2.4 meters with sensitivity levels as low as a quarter of a part per trillion. This level of precision equates to locating a single coin in a stack of pennies that is 17 million times taller than Mount Everest.

Government scientists improved sensitivity by allowing molecules more time to create detectable chemical reactions through random collisions with other molecules. While most devices used for identifying unknown substances react to molecules within a few milliseconds, Robert Ewing at PNNL notes that “we created an atmospheric flow tube. This expands the reaction time to 2-3 seconds, which boosts sensitivity by three orders of magnitude.”

The technology has been integrated into a compact, microwave-sized device weighing 18 kilograms. Developed by California-based company Bayspec, this miniaturized machine is still less sensitive than the larger, fridge-sized version used at the PNNL lab. However, Bayspec’s CEO, William Yang, claims it is “more accurate and sensitive than a dog.”

In October 2024, researchers from Bayspec and PNNL tested the portable device at a Customs and Border Protection (CBP) facility in Nogales, Arizona. During separate trials, researchers swiped the surfaces of seized tablets and heated the swabs to generate steam for detection. “Both techniques yielded strong and reliable results,” says Christian Thoma of Bayspec.

The prototype is still under evaluation and requires further scientific data analysis, according to a CBP spokesperson.

Alex Krotulski of the Center for Forensic Research and Education, a nonprofit in Pennsylvania, comments, “We’ve encountered many devices that promise too much, so we’re cautious until they demonstrate efficacy through extensive research and assessments.”

There are already existing portable methods, such as x-rays, to uncover hidden drugs. Richard Crocombe, an independent consultant in Massachusetts, considers the new tool “another valuable addition to the arsenal,” but cautions that it “doesn’t fulfill all requirements.” A CBP spokesman acknowledged that while it could expedite drug testing in field labs, new devices may still require analysis by trained chemists.

These screening methods are also prone to false positives; “drug residues can be quite ubiquitous,” states Joseph Palamar at New York University. A related study indicated that most U.S. banknotes are contaminated. “If you happen to be near someone using fentanyl, the device could react positively based on trace amounts they might have on clothing or shoes. This raises concerns about innocent individuals being wrongly detained,” warns Chelsea Schauber at UCLA.

Preventing drugs from entering the country is just one piece of the larger strategy needed to address the opioid crisis, according to Schauber. This also calls for robust public health agencies, better access to healthcare, and comprehensive treatment options. She emphasizes that these resources are currently being diminished under the Trump administration. “To save lives, we need evidence-based, effective treatments that are more accessible than illegal drugs,” Schober concludes.

Topics:

Source: www.newscientist.com