Breakthrough Discovery May Solve the Cosmological Chicken-and-Egg Dilemma

Did the Supermassive Black Hole at the Center of this Galaxy Form Before the Galaxy Itself?

NASA, ESA, STScI, AURA; S. Smartt/Queen’s University Belfast

If we consider the musings of the novelist and philosopher Samuel Butler from 1878, stating that “chickens are simply the means by which eggs produce other eggs,” we might parallel this with galaxies being mere vehicles through which black holes generate further black holes. In this cosmic conundrum, it seems that black holes take precedence.

Every major galaxy observed in the universe is anchored by a supermassive black hole at its heart. This relationship is crucial, as the black hole influences the galaxy’s developmental trajectory by consuming the surrounding matter. Yet, the genesis of this crucial connection poses an enduring enigma in cosmology. Does matter assemble to create black holes, or do sizable galaxies form first and collapse into black holes?

A pivotal element of this discussion revolves around the peculiar nature of supermassive black holes themselves, which seem almost impossible given their enormity. The concept of such massive entities existing merely 500 million years following the Big Bang raises eyebrows. To illustrate, if we condense the universe’s timeline into a single calendar year, the first supermassive black hole would have emerged shortly after the new year, rapidly accumulating mass far exceeding that of our sun. Current physical laws struggle to elucidate how something could grow so swiftly.

Four primary hypotheses exist for the formation of supermassive black holes. The most straightforward involves the merging of stellar-mass black holes, born from collapsing massive stars. However, this process spans hundreds of millions to billions of years, generating a time constraint that complicates the scenario. Another theory posits the creation of significant early seeds—potentially large protostars, dark matter stars, or star clusters. Yet, this too faces timing issues, as these seeds must form swiftly within the universe’s first 500 million years.

This leaves us with two feasible explanations: direct collapse, wherein intense radiation impedes star formation in massive gas clouds, enabling them to become black holes directly, and the controversial primordial black holes theory.

Primordial black holes, although lacking concrete evidence, would create fascinating implications if proven real. Forming in the universe’s nascent moments—not from stars but due to extreme pressures—they could potentially resolve some formation predicaments. While primordial black holes can be smaller than traditional models, our focus here is on the more massive black hole candidates, as these primordial entities likely evolved into significant structures faster than others.


If primordial black holes exist and mechanisms for the early formation of supermassive black holes are validated, then the chicken-and-egg quandary could find resolution. The rapid formation of these black holes implies galaxies might not have developed at comparable speeds, though confirmatory evidence remains elusive.

Thanks to the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), we now view the cosmic timeline with unprecedented clarity. Observations reveal the presence of supermassive black holes in every era examined. A standout discovery from JWST is a distant galaxy nicknamed the Little Red Dot. While newly uncovered, this discovery also revealed hundreds of further galaxies, characterized by their small size and significant distance.

After thorough investigation, researchers confirmed these entities are indeed galaxies, with their central black holes possessing unusually large masses and impressive spin rates. This remarkable size of black holes raises significant questions, especially after a 2024 study suggested they may constitute 20 to 70 percent of the total mass of their respective galaxies—an anomaly in current understanding.

JWST also uncovered a geometric anomaly that magnified light from a diminutive galaxy known as Abell 2744-QSO1 (or QS01). This observation, made just 700 million years post-Big Bang, enabled astronomers to assess the mass of QS01 and its central black hole. This type of measurement had never been accomplished for a black hole formed within a billion years of the Big Bang. The black hole’s mass was calculated to be roughly 50 million solar masses, with the total galaxy estimated at around 75 million.

Consequently, there are two pathways to interpret these findings: direct collapse or a primordial black hole, neither suggesting that galaxies predated their central black holes. Thus, it appears that the black hole at the center of QS01 is indeed the initial cosmic egg, resolving our query.

However, the complexity persists. We now need to investigate additional tiny red dots to determine whether QS01 is a typical example and to decipher the formation of its black hole and the galaxy’s composition. The ensuing discoveries are likely to unveil more mysteries. Yet, the progress made should be acknowledged, leading us to the undeniable conclusion that “the egg indeed came before the chicken.”

Topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Is Dark Energy Essential? Mathematicians Question the Standard Cosmological Model

Mathematicians from University College London and the University of California, Davis, have unveiled a groundbreaking mathematical proof demonstrating that the accelerating expansion of the universe can be explained without dark energy. This finding poses a significant challenge to the lambda cold dark matter model, the predominant cosmological framework that has prevailed for nearly three decades.

C. Alexander and collaborators provide proof that the inherent instability of the Einstein-Euler equation renders current expanding universe models infeasible. Image credit: M. Weiss / Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.

Nearly 30 years ago, dark energy was proposed as the force driving the accelerating expansion of the universe.

This concept mirrors Albert Einstein’s 1915 gravity equation within his general relativity framework.

To create a static universe, Einstein initially introduced an antigravitational factor, known as the cosmological constant.

After Edwin Hubble’s discovery in 1929 of the universe’s expansion, Einstein famously deemed the cosmological constant his “greatest failure” as it was unnecessary for predicting the expansion.

However, in the 1990s, the cosmological constant concept was revived to explain the universe’s accelerating expansion linked to dark energy.

Blake Temple, a professor at the University of California, Davis, stated, “The Friedman family of spacetime has served as a cornerstone of contemporary cosmology since Lemaître and Hubble first articulated the theory of an expanding universe stemming from an early Big Bang singularity.”

This theory is grounded in a specific solution to Einstein’s field equations discovered by Alexander Friedman in the early 1920s.

Friedman initially sent his solution to Einstein in 1922, who dismissed it, believing the universe to be static. However, following Friedman’s appeal, the solution gained acceptance.

By 1931, Einstein recognized that static models were unstable, acknowledging Hubble’s 1929 findings of an expanding universe, and praising Lemaître’s cosmology based on Friedmann spacetime as the most elegant explanation of creation.

Temple and his co-authors propose a theorem suggesting that all Friedmann spacetimes are unstable to any form of radial perturbations.

“At first, we considered that the universe’s acceleration might be due to a shock wave, with the anomalous acceleration resulting from an expansion wave following that shock,” Professor Temple noted.

“Later, we realized that during the radiation epoch of the Big Bang, there existed self-similar solutions that could model an expanding wave.”

Self-similar equations depict phenomena that retain their structure regardless of scale.

In their paper, the mathematicians utilize a self-similar version of the Einstein equations, previously derived, to characterize the Standard Model of cosmology as the stationary point of their equations.

This establishes a comprehensive mathematical framework for assessing the stability of the Standard Model and, more broadly, the stability of all Friedmann spacetimes in the matter-dominated epoch of the Big Bang.

“We demonstrated that, akin to Einstein’s static model, all Friedmann spacetimes are unstable to radial perturbations on large scales,” Professor Temple affirmed.

“This finding largely discounts the lambda cold dark matter model, with or without dark energy, as a stable solution to Einstein’s equations of general relativity.”

“In essence, the Big Bang should resemble Friedmann spacetime near the center of symmetry, while we should observe an acceleration away from Friedmann further from the center.”

Recent research indicates that the accelerating universe expansion is a direct result of the Einstein-Euler equation, without requiring a cosmological constant or dark energy.

This mathematics raises questions about the Copernican principle, which posits that Earth’s position is not special within the universe.

“Both the lambda cold dark matter model and spherically symmetric spacetime demand that the model occupies a specific position to remain physically valid,” Professor Temple explained.

“If this principle excludes one model, it must also exclude the other.”

Visit the research paper published in this week’s Proceedings of the Royal Society A.

_____

C. Alexander et al. 2026. The instability of critical and crowded Friedmann spacetime in the Big Bang as an alternative to dark energy. Proceedings A 482 (2338): 20250912; doi: 10.1098/rspa.2025.0912

Source: www.sci.news

Revolutionary Cosmological Simulations Illuminate Black Hole Growth in the Early Universe

Revolutionary simulations from Maynooth University astronomers reveal that, at the onset of the dense and turbulent universe, “light seed” black holes could swiftly consume matter, rivaling the supermassive black holes found at the centers of early galaxies.

Computer visualization of a baby black hole growing in an early universe galaxy. Image credit: Maynooth University.

Dr. Daksar Mehta, a candidate at Maynooth University, stated: “Our findings indicate that the chaotic environment of the early universe spawned smaller black holes that underwent a feeding frenzy, consuming surrounding matter and eventually evolving into the supermassive black holes observed today.”

“Through advanced computer simulations, we illustrate that the first-generation black holes, created mere hundreds of millions of years after the Big Bang, expanded at astonishing rates, reaching sizes up to tens of thousands of times that of the Sun.”

Dr. Louis Prowl, a postdoctoral researcher at Maynooth University, added: “This groundbreaking revelation addresses one of astronomy’s most perplexing mysteries.”

“It explains how black holes formed in the early universe could quickly attain supermassive sizes, as confirmed by observations from NASA/ESA/CSA’s James Webb Space Telescope.”

The dense, gas-rich environments of early galaxies facilitated brief episodes of “super-Eddington accretion,” a phenomenon where black holes consume matter at a rate faster than the norm.

Despite this rapid consumption, the black holes continue to devour material effectively.

The results uncover a pivotal “missing link” between the first stars and the immense black holes that emerged later on.

Mehta elaborated: “These smaller black holes were previously considered too insignificant to develop into the gigantic black holes at the centers of early galaxies.”

“What we have demonstrated is that, although these nascent black holes are small, they can grow surprisingly quickly under the right atmospheric conditions.”

There are two classifications of black holes: “heavy seed” and “light seed.”

Light seed black holes start with a mass of only a few hundred solar masses and must grow significantly to transform into supermassive entities, millions of times the mass of the Sun.

Conversely, heavy seed black holes begin life with masses reaching up to 100,000 times that of the Sun.

Previously, many astronomers believed that only heavy seed types could account for the existence of supermassive black holes seen at the hearts of large galaxies.

Dr. John Regan, an astronomer at Maynooth University, remarked: “The situation is now more uncertain.”

“Heavy seeds may be rare and depend on unique conditions for formation.”

“Our simulations indicate that ‘garden-type’ stellar-mass black holes have the potential to grow at extreme rates during the early universe.”

This research not only reshapes our understanding of black hole origins but also underscores the significance of high-resolution simulations in uncovering the universe’s fundamental secrets.

“The early universe was far more chaotic and turbulent than previously anticipated, and the population of supermassive black holes is also more extensive than we thought,” Dr. Regan commented.

The findings hold relevance for the ESA/NASA Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) mission, set to launch in 2035.

Dr. Regan added, “Future gravitational wave observations from this mission may detect mergers of these small, rapidly growing baby black holes.”

For further insights, refer to this paper, published in this week’s edition of Nature Astronomy.

_____

D.H. Meter et al. Growth of light seed black holes in the early universe. Nat Astron published online on January 21, 2026. doi: 10.1038/s41550-025-02767-5

Source: www.sci.news

How “Beauty Factory” Addresses Two Major Cosmological Mysteries

“B-mesons assist us in unraveling significant cosmic queries. Why is there a predominance of matter over antimatter?”

sakkmesterke/alamy

Did you know that in the realm of physics, there are facilities dubbed beauty factories? This term doesn’t refer to aesthetics; rather, it describes an experiment where electrons collide with their antimatter equivalents, positrons, to create B-mesons.

B-mesons are constructed from quarks, the building blocks of normal matter. Typically, everyday matter comprises up-quarks and down-quarks, while B-mesons are made up of beauty quarks combined with up, down, charm, or strange quarks.

This unique configuration results in B-mesons having a fleeting existence, seemingly detached from common life. However, their significance lies in the potential answers they hold regarding universal enigmas, such as the imbalance of matter versus antimatter.

We understand that all particles have corresponding antiparticles. Yet, when we observe the universe, we see a predominance of particles, like electrons, overshadowing their antiparticle counterparts, positrons, which are merely identical but with reversed charges.

Mesons are particularly intriguing as they inhabit the space between the prevalent matter and antimatter realms. This positions them as potential keys to unlocking the mystery of the disparity between the two. Grasping this could clarify why the universe holds such a favorable balance of matter when encounters between matter and antimatter typically result in annihilation. The formation of B factories arises from the desire to decode this cosmic puzzle.

The complexity deepens when considering mesons and their own antiparticles. Each B-meson consists of beauty quarks paired with up, down, charm, or strange quarks. Neutral B-mesons, devoid of charge, exhibit oscillatory behavior as they transform between mesons and their antiparticles. In essence, neutral B-mesons exemplify a spontaneous non-binary state.

These neutral B-mesons are pivotal in addressing the asymmetry of matter and antimatter. Their non-binary characteristics are anticipated within the standard model of particle physics, which catalogs known particles. However, we must determine whether these oscillatory states are evenly distributed. Are collisions more likely to yield a meson or its antiparticle? Disparities in these oscillations may shed light on the core asymmetries of matter and antimatter.


B factories could illuminate the nature of an elusive component: dark matter, which remains unseen in laboratories.

In 2010, researchers from the Fermilab Dzero collaboration identified a 1% deviation, although subsequent studies haven’t corroborated this result. The exploration of these discrepancies continues to intrigue, particularly as variances emerge in unrelated vibration studies.

B factories may also expand our comprehension of dark matter, an entity detected only through its gravitational effects on visible matter. Approximately 85% of the universe’s mass seems to consist of this invisible material, which the standard model has yet to account for.

Crafting a theory to explain dark matter necessitates postulating new particles or forces, some of which might interact subtly with known particles, complicating detection. These interactions often hinge on mediators—entities that facilitate such connections. While these mediators are elusive, under optimal conditions, they may not be directly observable. However, we can anticipate witnessing decay products, such as electron-positron pairs, serving as indicators. This is where B factories play a crucial role; they are engineered to analyze the outcomes of electron-positron collisions.

In addition to collider physics, the longevity of data acquisition and experiments is particularly captivating. For instance, the BABAR experiment at the SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory closed in 2008, yet researchers continue to sift through its data, educating the next generation of physicists.

In 2022, Brian Schub and his undergraduate team at Harvey Mudd College near Los Angeles revisited ideas involving nearly two-decade-old BABAR data. They proposed that virtual particles, referred to as axions, may function as mediators between visible and dark matter. Long-time readers may recognize that axion research is a focal point of my work.

So, do these hypotheses regarding our universe’ mechanics hold water? This inquiry aligns with our quest to comprehend matter-antimatter asymmetry.

What I’m reading

I’ve just finished Wasim, a student of Gazan physics. Witness to the Hellfire of Genocide, A tragic memoir.

What I’m watching

I’m finally watching The Wire after years of avoidance.

What I’m working on

I am reexamining cosmological perturbation theory.

Chanda Prescod-Weinstein is an associate professor of physics and astronomy at the University of New Hampshire. She is the author of The Disordered Cosmos and future works Edges of Space Time: Particles, Poetry, Boogie in the Universe Dreams

Source: www.newscientist.com

Astronomers Use Cosmological Radio Signals to Identify First-Generation Stars in the Universe

The primordial stars, known as group III, likely formed from the abundant gases present in the young universe. These stars were responsible for generating the first heavier elements, illuminating the universe, bringing an end to the cosmic dark ages, and ushering in the era of reionization. Due to the challenges of direct observation, the characteristics of these early stars are still largely unknown. Professor Anastasia Fialkov from Cambridge University and her team suggest that astronomers can infer the masses of these stars by analyzing the cosmological 21 cm signal produced by hydrogen atoms located between the regions where the stars formed.

Artist’s impression of a field of Population III stars that would have existed hundreds of millions of years post-Big Bang. Image credits: noirlab/nsf/aura/J. da silva/SpaceEngine.

“This presents a unique opportunity to understand how the universe’s first light emerged from darkness,” stated Professor Fialkov.

“We are beginning to unravel the narrative of the transition from a cold, dark cosmos to one filled with stars.”

Studies focused on the universe’s ancient stars rely on the faint 21 cm signal, an energy signature emanating from over 13 billion years ago.

This signal, influenced by the radiation from nascent stars and black holes, offers a rare glimpse into the universe’s formative years.

Professor Fialkov leads the Leach theory group dedicated to radio experiments analyzing space hydrogen.

“Leach is a radio antenna and one of two key projects designed to enhance our understanding of the dawn and reionization phases of the universe, when the first stars reactivated neutral hydrogen atoms,” explained the astronomer.

“While our abilities to capture radio signals are presently undergoing calibration, we remain dedicated to unveiling insights about the early universe.

“Conversely, the Square Kilometer Arrays (SKAs) chart variations in cosmic signals across extensive areas of the sky.”

“Both initiatives are crucial for probing the masses, brightness, and distribution of the universe’s earliest stars.”

In their current research, Professor Fialkov and co-authors formulated a model to predict the 21 cm signal for both REACH and SKA, discovering that the signal is sensitive to the mass of the first stars.

“We are the first group to accurately model how the 21 cm signal correlates with the mass of the first stars, factoring in ultraviolet starlight and x-ray emissions resulting from the demise of the first stars,” stated Professor Fialkov.

“Our findings stem from simulations integrating the primordial conditions of the universe, such as the hydrogen and helium composition formed during the Big Bang.”

In developing their theoretical framework, researchers examined how the 21 cm signal responds to the mass distribution of Population III stars.

They discovered that earlier studies underestimated this relationship as they failed to account for both the quantity and luminosity of x-ray binaries among Population III stars and their impact on the 21 cm signal.

While REACH and SKA cannot photograph individual stars, they do provide comprehensive data on stars, x-ray binary systems, and entire galactic populations.

“Connecting radio data to the narrative of the first stars requires some imagination, but its implications are profound,” remarked Professor Fialkov.

“The predictions we present hold significant value in enhancing our understanding of the universe’s earliest stars,” noted Dr. Eloi de Lera Acedo from Cambridge University.

“We offer insights into the masses of these early stars, suggesting that the light they emitted may have been drastically different from today’s stars.”

“Next-generation telescopes like REACH are set to unlock the secrets of the early universe. These predictions are vital for interpreting radio observations being conducted from Karu, South Africa.”

The research paper was published online today in the journal Nature Astronomy.

____

T. Gessey-Jones et al. Determination of the mass distribution of the first stars from a 21 cm signal. Nature Astronomy Published online on June 20th, 2025. doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02575-x

Source: www.sci.news