Exploring the Implications of an Extra Dimension in the Universe: What It Means for Science and Reality

Extra dimensions allow for even more complex shapes

Vitalij Chalupnik / Alamy and NASA, ESA, and K. Stapelfeldt (JPL)

One of the most striking interviews of my career began with me sitting at my desk, head in my hands, discussing extra dimensions with a physicist over the phone. I sought to grasp the implications of dimensions being “small.” Amidst the conversation, I tuned out the laughter of a colleague and asked, “They’re not as small as jellybeans, are they?” The answer? It’s a complex one.

While extra dimensions are routinely referenced in physics, their true significance is often overlooked. They frequently arise in discussions regarding string theory—a revolutionary concept proposing that everything stems from minuscule, vibrating strings. These vibrations create particles, from atoms to electrons to quarks. My skepticism about string theory stems from its ideas ranging from the profoundly challenging to the outright untestable, which can be quite daunting. Additionally, these theories usually depend on an extra dimension to conceal the curled strings, a notion that I find difficult to wrap my head around.

Some established explanations, like the Flatland novella, provide entertaining yet enlightening allegories—helping us understand the experience of encountering another dimension while accustomed to four. However, most discussions devolve into ambiguity before we move on.

If extra dimensions are indeed real, they could resolve significant issues in both physics and cosmology, making it imperative to explore them. A notable challenge is gravity: paradoxically weaker than other fundamental forces. This anomaly might occur because gravity “leaks” into other dimensions, reducing its force in our observable universe. Recent hypotheses suggest that dark energy might similarly diminish over time due to an evolving extra dimension, affecting the energy balance of our familiar four-dimensional setup: three spatial dimensions and one of time.

Moreover, this concept is captivating, even as I grapple with the likelihood of extra dimensions existing alongside our own.

One of the most comprehensible kinds of additional dimensions can be found in Flatland, a narrative about geometric entities inhabiting a two-dimensional realm. They navigate a flat surface, much like a puck on ice, and perceive other shapes merely as lines from their limited viewpoint.

Conversely, beings with additional dimensions (humans, for example) see these entities from above or below, recognizing them as shapes rather than mere lines. In our three-dimensional world, we can extract shapes from this plane and rotate them. The remaining forms in Flatland maintain their flatness; instead of seeing stable lines, we’d view an intriguing cross-section where the shape intersects our dimension.

When applied to our universe — with three spatial dimensions and one temporal — even higher-dimensional entities could peer within our world, potentially drawing us into their dimensional space. Observers left behind would witness shifting cross-sections of our likenesses as we traverse this five-dimensional reality.

A variation of this scenario is the brane-world hypothesis, suggesting that our universe exists as the boundary of a higher-dimensional space. Originally proposed in 1999, this concept has recently gained traction as a feasible integration of our universe with the principles of string theory.

In one interpretation, our universe resides at the precipice between a higher-dimensional construct known as hyperspace and the void. Essentially, we occupy the very edge of existence, intriguingly termed the End of the World Brain. The fundamental particles we recognize correspond to the terminals of five-dimensional strings within hyperspace — yet, like the shapes in Flatland, we can never perceive the entirety of these strings.

This theory introduces five dimensions, but there could be countless others, most not resembling our universe at all. Imagine time not merely progressing forward and backward but also moving sideways (details omitted). Some dimensions could possess sizes akin to jellybeans, or even minuscule.

Are extra dimensions like nesting dolls?

Lars Ruecker/Getty Images

Consider a dimension as a collection of glass matryoshka dolls, each nestled within a larger one, accessible depending on the dimensional level one inhabits (likely four) and the doll representing the inner dimensions. The dimensions comparable to a jellybean may seem physically minute but represent expansive realities, akin to bubbles in glass. Each of these bubbles encapsulates a small realm, a kind of pocket universe.

Wondering about entry into this pocket world? These dimensions are often extremely diminutive, making it improbable for anyone larger than a jellybean—or perhaps a photon—to encounter them. Their minuscule nature is partly why they remain elusive. More sizeable dimensions would certainly attract attention. However, discovering smaller dimensions is not entirely out of the question. Think of light passing through a glass matryoshka doll. Air bubbles distort and reflect light. A parallel phenomenon occurs in actual additional dimensions.

Imagine a gravitational wave traversing one of our universe’s bubbles. It could emerge distorted, and with a potent enough detector, such distortions could be measured. Other investigative methods might include subtle quantum effects and exotic particles believed to originate exclusively from extra dimensions.

Researchers utilizing gravitational wave detectors, particle colliders, and traditional telescopes are diligently searching for these faint signs. However, no concrete evidence has been unearthed yet. Nonetheless, the very endeavor of seeking out extra dimensions could undermine my initial assertion that string theory lacks testable predictions. Should we eventually uncover such dimensions, it could significantly reshape my perspective on string theory — and our overarching understanding of the universe.

Topics:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Astronomers Uncover Hidden Structure of the Early Universe: Breakthrough Discoveries Explained

Astronomers have utilized spectral data from the Hobby-Eberly Telescope at McDonald Observatory to construct the most intricate 3D map of faint cosmic structures dating back 9 to 11 billion years, unveiling galaxies and intergalactic gas previously undetectable by telescopes.



A line intensity map showcasing the distribution of excited hydrogen in the universe approximately 10 billion years ago. The stars denote areas where HETDEX has identified galaxies. The inset simulates the structure after optimizing the data by reducing background noise. Image credit: Maja Lujan Niemeyer / Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics / HETDEX / Chris Byrohl / Stanford University.

“Studying the early Universe reveals how galaxies have evolved into their current forms and the role that intergalactic gas plays in this transformation,” stated Dr. Maya Lujan Niemeyer, an astronomer at the Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics and Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich, and a key member of the Hobby-Eberly Telescope’s Dark Energy Experiment (HETDEX).

“Many objects from this epoch are faint and challenging to observe due to their vast distances,” she continued.

“Through a technique known as line intensity mapping, this innovative map enhances our understanding of these objects, adding complexity and depth to this crucial era of cosmic history.”

Although line intensity mapping is not a novel methodology, this is the first instance it has been employed to visualize Lyman alpha emissions with such exceptional precision across an extensive dataset.

The HETDEX project harnesses the capabilities of the Hobby-Eberly Telescope to catalog over 1 million luminous galaxies to decode the mysteries of dark energy.

What differentiates this project is its extensive measurement scope, equivalent to observing more than 2,000 full moons and amassing a colossal dataset of over 600 million spectra across an expansive area of the sky.

“We leverage only a fraction of our data—approximately 5%,” remarked Dr. Karl Gebhardt, principal investigator of HETDEX and an astronomer at the University of Texas at Austin.

“This leaves significant potential for future research utilizing the remaining data.”

“While HETDEX captures images of the entire sky, only a small subset of the collected data comprises sufficiently bright galaxies for our research,” noted Dr. Lujan Niemeyer.

“These galaxies are merely the beginning. In the vast expanses in between, lies an entire ocean of light awaiting discovery.”

To construct this groundbreaking map, astronomers employed a supercomputer at the Texas Advanced Computing Center to meticulously analyze approximately half a petabyte of HETDEX data.

Using the coordinates of luminous galaxies already detected by HETDEX, they inferred the positions of fainter galaxies and adjacent glowing gas.

Due to the gravitational forces that cause matter to cluster, the existence of one bright galaxy implies the presence of nearby celestial objects.

“This allows us to utilize known galaxy positions as reference points to ascertain distances to fainter celestial entities,” explained Dr. Eiichiro Komatsu, HETDEX scientist and astronomer at the Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics.

“The resultant map emphasizes regions surrounding bright galaxies while providing intricate details of the areas in between.”

“Simulation models exist for this cosmic era, yet they remain hypothetical; they do not represent the actual universe.”

“We now possess a foundational understanding that allows us to verify whether the astrophysics underlying these simulations holds true.”

For more on these remarkable findings, published on March 3, 2026, in the Astrophysical Journal.

_____

Maya Lujan Niemeyer and others, 2026. Lyα intensity mapping in HETDEX: Galaxy-Lyα intensity cross-power spectrum. APJ 999, 177; doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ae3a98

Source: www.sci.news

Understanding the Shape of the Universe: What We Know So Far

Carina Nebula

Carina Nebula Observed by the Hubble Space Telescope

NASA/ESA/M. Livio, Hubble Heritage Team & Hubble 20th Anniversary Team (STScI)

Embark on a journey through the cosmos, exploring our solar system, traversing the Milky Way, and venturing into the vast cosmic wilderness, rich with black holes and galaxies. The question remains: Is the universe truly infinite?

Can exploration go on forever, or is there a boundary at some point? This significant inquiry in cosmology seeks to determine the universe’s size and shape. Although we have some clues, they lead to more questions than answers, leaving much in mystery.

When discussing space with peers, we often emphasize its vastness and potential infinity—a concept that challenges our understanding. Cosmologists have grappled with such ideas for centuries. The key to grasping the universe’s size lies in understanding its shape, which has been subject to diverse theories.

The simplest model is a flat universe, reminiscent of a sheet. While reality is far more complex, this metaphor aids comprehension. A flat universe would mean conventional rules of geometry apply—triangles maintain a sum of 180 degrees and lines remain straight. However, in a curved universe, geometry becomes non-Euclidean, leading to unexpected results.

The universe’s structure is influenced by gravity and dark energy; gravity binds matter together while dark energy acts as a force expanding the cosmos. If these forces balance perfectly, the universe remains flat. If dark energy dominates, it resembles a Pringle shape, while differing configurations may yield a finite or infinite cosmos.

Should gravity prevail, the universe would be spherical and finite—a straightforward conclusion. However, extrapolating from various large-scale cosmological observations suggests that the universe is likely flat. Recent findings indicate dark energy might decrease over time, underscoring our limited understanding of the universe as a whole. Despite creating detailed maps of dark matter, it remains enigmatic, complicating our grasp of gravity and its implications. Therefore, describing the universe as “probably flat” requires cautious interpretation.

As a storyteller, I must confess a bias against infinity. While intriguing, the concept’s application in the physical realm presents difficulty. My inclination is that every reality necessitates some limitation, however expansive. Infinity can feel unquantifiable, and if equations falter, can we genuinely assume an eternal existence?

This perspective is not unique; many theories subscribe to the idea of a finite universe. Even with a flat structure, the connections between different spacetime regions remain puzzling. Should the universe be finite and flat, we encounter an intriguing dilemma: what lies beyond its boundaries? Is it another universe, or simply nothingness? The prospects are disconcerting, complicating the mathematics that describe our reality.

Exploring Possible Shapes of the Universe

Nataliia Pyzhova, MAXSHOT.PL, Sashkin/Shutterstock

In a curved spacetime, options expand. Spherical structures lack edges; travel far enough in one direction, and you may find yourself back where it began. Other possibilities include shapes resembling donuts, Klein bottles, or intricate topologies with wormholes. While some theories posit shapes like peanuts, cones, or apples, adding extra dimensions complicates matters further.

Introducing infinity creates a more chaotic scenario—an eternal universe filled with limitless galaxies and star systems. The focus shifts from the universe’s edges to the entirety contained within it.

This concept can be exhilarating: the spectrum of possibilities appears endless, and it’s statistically likely that other life forms exist. However, contemplating an infinite universe can be overwhelming. While it’s thrilling to imagine the vastness of life out there, the thought that “the universe is eternal, so anything can happen” can seem a bit meaningless.

Yet, these feelings are subjective. Ultimately, physics relies on observation and mathematics. This aspect is what I appreciate about physics—its precision; but infinity lacks that precision. When you set off through space, you desire a destination, whether it’s an edge or home.

Unravel the Mysteries of the Universe: Cheshire, England

Join leading scientists for a weekend exploring the universe’s mysteries, featuring a tour of the iconic Lovell Telescope.

Topics:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Comprehensive Review of ‘A Brief History of the Universe (and Our Place in It)’: Discover the Cosmic Big Picture

Illustration of the tidal disruption event (TDE), showcasing a star being torn apart by a supermassive black hole's gravity, forming a fan-shaped debris pattern around it.

Space Exploration: Insights into Black Holes

Mark Garlick/Science Photo Library

A Brief History of the Universe
By Sarah Alam Malik, Published by Simon & Schuster (UK, February 12) and William Morrow (USA, May 5)

Published in 1988, Stephen Hawking’s A Brief History of Time revolutionized the field of cosmology and became a bestseller. As a curious teenager, I attempted to read it, but I never finished. Now, nearly four decades later, particle physicist Sara Alam Malik offers her own perspective on cosmology with A Brief History of the Universe (and Our Place in It).

While Hawking’s work began with Aristotle’s heliocentric theory from 340 BC, Malik traces our understanding back to Babylonian astronomical observations recorded in cuneiform around the 7th century BC. The journey then progresses through the contributions of Aristotle and Ptolemy, reaching the flourishing of astronomical sciences in the Islamic Golden Age during the 6th century AD.

This concise history propels readers through significant milestones by page 47, covering Galileo’s discovery of Jupiter’s moons, Newton’s apple, and Einstein’s general relativity, ultimately exploring the mysteries of galaxies and black holes, leading to the concept of the universe’s thermal death. Malik adeptly connects cosmic-scale truths with the intricate world of quantum mechanics, stating, “The building blocks of the universe turned out to be as amazing as the structure of the universe they created.”

Unlike Hawking’s technical depth, Malik adopts a broader perspective, bringing to life characters such as Dmitri Mendeleev, who created the periodic table, and Fritz Zwicky, the pioneer of dark matter. Her narrative highlights a diverse cast, including medieval Islamic astronomers and groundbreaking women like Vera Rubin, who overcame gender barriers to reshape our understanding of galaxies.

Written with a more contemporary tone, Malik discusses topics Hawking could not forecast in 1988, such as the Large Hadron Collider, revealing the emotional impact of scientific breakthroughs like the Higgs boson discovery through compelling anecdotes.

This book is not only a “brief history of the universe” but emphasizes “and our place in it.” It narrates humanity’s discovery of the cosmos, underscoring our journey enabled by the giants before us. It evokes awe and humility, reminding us, “It remains a wonder of human existence that we can understand worlds so far removed from our own.” Each era has crafted its narrative of the universe, often believing its own version.

At its best, Malik’s work dives deeply into cosmic and quantum mysteries, aligning with her expertise in dark matter. While chapters on the origin of life, its future, and machine intelligence may feel less thorough, her warm, clear prose covers an impressive breadth within just 223 pages. As an 18-year-old, I might have navigated this complex narrative and been inspired to follow in Hawking’s footsteps.

Topics:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Exploring the Universe: Unlocking Fundamental Quantum Secrets Yet to be Discovered

Conceptual diagram of quantum fluctuations

We May Never Know the Universal Wave Function

Victor de Schwanberg/Science Photo Library/Getty Images

From the perspective of quantum physics, the universe may be fundamentally agnostic in some respects.

In quantum physics, every object, such as an electron, corresponds to a mathematical entity known as a wave function. This wave function encodes all details regarding an object’s quantum state. By combining the wave function with other equations, physicists can effectively predict the behavior of objects in experiments.

If we accept that the entire universe operates on quantum principles, then even larger entities, including the cosmos itself, must possess a wave function. This perspective has been supported by iconic physicists like Stephen Hawking.

However, researchers like Eddie Kemin Chen from the University of California, San Diego and Roderich Tumulka from the University of Tübingen in Germany, have demonstrated that complete knowledge of the universal wave function may be fundamentally unattainable.

“The cosmic wave function is like a cosmic secret that physics itself conspires to protect. We can predict a lot about how the universe behaves, yet we remain fundamentally unsure of its precise quantum state,” states Chen.

Previous studies assumed specific forms for the universal wave function based on theoretical models of the universe, overlooking the implications of experimental observations. Chen and Tumulka began with a more practical inquiry: Can observations help in identifying the correct wave function among those that reasonably describe our universe?

The researchers utilized mathematical outcomes from quantum statistical mechanics, which examines the properties of collections of quantum states. A significant factor in their calculations was the realization that the universal wave function depends on numerous parameters and exists in a high-dimensional abstract state.

Remarkably, upon completing their calculations, they found that universal quantum states are essentially agnostic.

“The measurements permissible by the rules of quantum mechanics provide very limited insight into the universe’s wave function. Determining the wave function of the universe with significant precision is impossible,” explains Tumulka.

Professor JB Manchak from the University of California, Irvine states that this research enhances our understanding of the limits of our best empirical methods, noting that we essentially have an equivalent to general relativity within the framework of quantum physics. He adds that this should not come as a surprise since quantum theory was not originally designed as a comprehensive theory of the universe.

“The wave function of a small system or the entire universe is a highly theoretical construct. Wave functions are meaningful not because they are observable, but because we employ them,” remarks Sheldon Goldstein from Rutgers University. He further explains that the inability to pinpoint a unique, accurate universal wave function from a limited range of candidates may not be problematic, as any of these functions could yield similar effects in future calculations.

Chen expresses hope to connect his and Tumulka’s research with the exploration of large-scale systems smaller than the universe itself, especially through techniques like shadow tomography, which aim to determine the quantum state of such systems. However, the philosophical consequences of their work are equally crucial. Tumulka emphasizes the need for caution against over-relying on positivist views that deem non-experimental statements as meaningless or unscientific. “Some truths are real, but cannot be measured,” he asserts.

This rationale might influence ongoing debates regarding the interpretation of quantum mechanics. According to Emily Adlam from Chapman University in California, the new findings advocate for incorporating more components into the interpretation of quantum equations, such as wave functions, emphasizing the relationship between quantum objects and individual observer perspectives, moving away from the assumption of a singular objective reality dictated by a single mathematical construct.

Topic:

This revised content is SEO-optimized with relevant keywords and better formatting for improved readability and search engine visibility.

Source: www.newscientist.com

Revolutionary Cosmological Simulations Illuminate Black Hole Growth in the Early Universe

Revolutionary simulations from Maynooth University astronomers reveal that, at the onset of the dense and turbulent universe, “light seed” black holes could swiftly consume matter, rivaling the supermassive black holes found at the centers of early galaxies.

Computer visualization of a baby black hole growing in an early universe galaxy. Image credit: Maynooth University.

Dr. Daksar Mehta, a candidate at Maynooth University, stated: “Our findings indicate that the chaotic environment of the early universe spawned smaller black holes that underwent a feeding frenzy, consuming surrounding matter and eventually evolving into the supermassive black holes observed today.”

“Through advanced computer simulations, we illustrate that the first-generation black holes, created mere hundreds of millions of years after the Big Bang, expanded at astonishing rates, reaching sizes up to tens of thousands of times that of the Sun.”

Dr. Louis Prowl, a postdoctoral researcher at Maynooth University, added: “This groundbreaking revelation addresses one of astronomy’s most perplexing mysteries.”

“It explains how black holes formed in the early universe could quickly attain supermassive sizes, as confirmed by observations from NASA/ESA/CSA’s James Webb Space Telescope.”

The dense, gas-rich environments of early galaxies facilitated brief episodes of “super-Eddington accretion,” a phenomenon where black holes consume matter at a rate faster than the norm.

Despite this rapid consumption, the black holes continue to devour material effectively.

The results uncover a pivotal “missing link” between the first stars and the immense black holes that emerged later on.

Mehta elaborated: “These smaller black holes were previously considered too insignificant to develop into the gigantic black holes at the centers of early galaxies.”

“What we have demonstrated is that, although these nascent black holes are small, they can grow surprisingly quickly under the right atmospheric conditions.”

There are two classifications of black holes: “heavy seed” and “light seed.”

Light seed black holes start with a mass of only a few hundred solar masses and must grow significantly to transform into supermassive entities, millions of times the mass of the Sun.

Conversely, heavy seed black holes begin life with masses reaching up to 100,000 times that of the Sun.

Previously, many astronomers believed that only heavy seed types could account for the existence of supermassive black holes seen at the hearts of large galaxies.

Dr. John Regan, an astronomer at Maynooth University, remarked: “The situation is now more uncertain.”

“Heavy seeds may be rare and depend on unique conditions for formation.”

“Our simulations indicate that ‘garden-type’ stellar-mass black holes have the potential to grow at extreme rates during the early universe.”

This research not only reshapes our understanding of black hole origins but also underscores the significance of high-resolution simulations in uncovering the universe’s fundamental secrets.

“The early universe was far more chaotic and turbulent than previously anticipated, and the population of supermassive black holes is also more extensive than we thought,” Dr. Regan commented.

The findings hold relevance for the ESA/NASA Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) mission, set to launch in 2035.

Dr. Regan added, “Future gravitational wave observations from this mission may detect mergers of these small, rapidly growing baby black holes.”

For further insights, refer to this paper, published in this week’s edition of Nature Astronomy.

_____

D.H. Meter et al. Growth of light seed black holes in the early universe. Nat Astron published online on January 21, 2026. doi: 10.1038/s41550-025-02767-5

Source: www.sci.news

Key Moments: The Most Crucial Seconds in the History of the Universe

An Artist’s Rendition of the Universe’s Early Moments

Credit: Alfred Pasieka/Science Photo Library/Alamy Stock Photo

The initial second of the universe’s existence was arguably the most significant moment in history. According to Big Bang cosmology, which is widely accepted by most cosmologists, the universe commenced from an infinitely small and dense state, expanding into a vast cosmos over several light-years.

This monumental journey began with a phase known as inflation. The exact cause of this exponential expansion remains a mystery; however, every 10 years, it is estimated that the distance between any two points in space doubled. This process saw the universe swell by a billion times, far exceeding the total number of grains of sand found on Earth’s beaches – and even surpassing the number of stars in the known universe.

During this inflationary period, foundational structures, which would evolve into the universe’s largest formations, were established. As the universe expanded, minuscule irregularities grew, driven by the randomness of quantum mechanics. These fluctuations contributed to differences in the density of the immensely hot plasma that filled the universe.

The duration of the Inflationary Era and the final size of the universe at its conclusion are topics of ongoing debate. While cosmologists might liken its size to that of various fruits, the consensus is that it lasted just a fleeting moment. Despite its rapid growth, the universe would have been comparable to a grain of sand up to a few meters in diameter, existing as a hot, opaque plasma interspersed with the first particles and antiparticles amidst raw energy.

As this hot sphere expanded, it gradually cooled, allowing particles to bond and form the first hadrons, including protons and neutrons, which comprise most of today’s matter. This process, known as baryogenesis, saw an unexpected surplus of matter compared to antimatter, resulting in the majority of antimatter annihilating with matter during the early universe’s development.

As particles continued to evolve, the universe underwent significant transitions referred to as “phase transitions,” simultaneously altering the state of all matter. This was a unique moment of synchronicity that has never been replicated. Initially, the four fundamental forces of nature – gravity, strong force, weak force, and electromagnetic force – were unified during the Big Bang, but separate distinguished behaviors emerged within the first billionth of a second.

These phase transitions facilitated further changes. The universe transitioned from opaque to transparent, allowing radiation to flow freely, lighting up the cosmos. Newly formed matter particles began gaining mass through interactions with the Higgs field, which had recently become separated from other fields. At this juncture, only a trillionth of a second post-Big Bang, particles, including the fundamental ones, began to acquire mass, significantly altering the cosmic landscape.

As the universe, still less than a light-year in diameter, started clumping together due to the quantum fluctuations, it laid the groundwork for the eventual formation of galaxies and star clusters. While it took an extensive period for these structures to materialize, this aggregation was a crucial event in cosmic evolution.

Approximately one second after the Big Bang, the rapid evolution of the cosmos began to moderate. Although the universe remained considerably smaller than the distance between our Sun and the nearest star, Alpha Centauri, the fundamental particles and forces that shaped its future were already taking familiar forms.

Nuclei formed a few minutes after the Big Bang, but it would be hundreds of thousands of years before they could hold electrons and create neutral atoms. Stars and galaxies took tens of millions of years more to emerge. Yet, the essential foundations for our universe were established within that brief second. Numerous seconds have elapsed since then, with cosmologists tirelessly investigating and piecing together the myriad events bridging that primeval moment to the present.

Ultimately, that single second of cosmic history was transformative. It propelled the universe from a point in the vast nothingness into the primordial soup from which everything else arose.

Source: www.newscientist.com

Unlocking the Universe: Discovering RELHIC – A New Type of Celestial Object

Astronomers utilizing the NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope have verified the presence of a starless, hydrogen-rich object primarily composed of dark matter. These intriguing entities, referred to as reionization-limited HI clouds (RELHICs), are remnants of the early Universe. They pose challenges to traditional theories of galaxy formation and may indicate undiscovered populations of similar cosmic structures.



This image illustrates the location of RELHIC object Cloud-9. Image credits: NASA / ESA / VLA / Gagandeep Anand, STScI / Alejandro Benitez-Llambay, University of Milan-Bicocca / Joseph DePasquale, STScI.

The RELHIC object, known as Cloud-9, was detected using the 500-meter Aperture Spherical Telescope (FAST) and its existence was independently verified by the Very Large Array (VLA) and the Green Bank Telescope (GBT).

“This is the narrative of a failed galaxy,” states astronomer Alejandro Benítez Lambay from the University of Milano-Bicocca.

“Scientific advancements often arise from failures rather than successes. In this case, the absence of stars confirms our theoretical framework,” he adds.

“This discovery reveals primordial components of galaxies yet to form within our local universe.”

The core of Cloud-9 consists of neutral hydrogen and spans approximately 4,900 light-years in diameter.

This object is positioned in proximity to the spiral galaxy Messier 94, shares its recession velocity, and is approximately 14.3 million light-years away from Earth.

“Cloud-9 represents a crucial glimpse into the enigmatic dark universe,” remarked Dr. Andrew Fox, an astronomer at ESA’s Association of Universities for Astronomical Research/Space Telescope Science Institute (AURA/STScI).

“Theoretical models suggest that a majority of the universe’s mass is composed of dark matter, which does not emit light, thus making it challenging to detect.”

“Cloud-9 offers a rare opportunity to study clouds dominated by dark matter.”

Astronomers employed Hubble’s Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) to search for bright stellar components within Cloud-9.

The findings discount the presence of dwarf galaxies with detectable stellar masses.

“The lack of observable stars reinforces the interpretation of this system as a RELHIC—a starless dark matter halo filled with hydrostatic gas in thermal equilibrium with the cosmic ultraviolet background,” stated the researchers.

Cloud-9 stands as a prime candidate for a compact HI cloud and offers robust empirical support for the ΛCDM (lambda cold dark matter) model, a leading cosmological framework.

This model predicts the existence of a starless dark matter halo filled with gas on subgalactic mass scales that have yet to form stars.

“The discovery of Cloud-9 also refines the current thresholds for halo mass required for galaxy formation, bringing us closer to understanding why some dark matter halos host galaxies while others remain barren,” concluded the researchers.

For detailed findings, look for the upcoming publication in the Astrophysics Journal Letter.

_____

Gagandeep S. Anand et al. 2025. The first RELHIC? Cloud-9 is a starless gas cloud. APJL 993, L55; doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae1584

Source: www.sci.news

Mysterious Blob in Early Universe Heats Up: Unraveling the Mystery Behind It

Galaxy Cluster SPT2349-56

This galaxy cluster must be much, much colder than it actually is.

Lingxiao Yuan

Recent discoveries about young galaxy clusters, such as SPT2349-56, are transforming our understanding of how these colossal structures formed and evolved in the early universe. Interestingly, the gas within SPT2349-56 is significantly hotter and denser than anticipated, posing intriguing questions for researchers.

Zhou Daizhi and their team at the University of British Columbia utilized the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) in Chile to investigate this galaxy cluster. Their findings revealed that the gas at the cluster’s center reaches temperatures of tens of millions of degrees Celsius.

“The sun’s surface temperature is just a few thousand degrees Celsius, making this region much hotter,” Zhou notes. “Our conservative estimates indicate temperatures five to ten times higher than expected based on simulations, which is surprising since such hot gas was thought to exist only in clusters billions of years old.”

Located in the early universe, approximately 1.4 billion years after the Big Bang, SPT2349-56 is unlike any other known cluster of its age. Zhou explains, “This gas should still be relatively cold and in small quantities, as these nascent clusters are still in the process of accumulating gas and heating up.” However, SPT2349-56 seems to be more mature than anticipated.

The unusual heating could stem from the presence of particularly active galaxies within the cluster, with at least three galaxies emitting massive jets of energy. These jets, combined with intermittent star formation bursts, might be heating the gas rapidly, challenging previous assumptions.

“This discovery opens a new window into understanding stages of cluster evolution that we have not observed before,” Zhou emphasizes. The research team plans additional observations to locate more hot young clusters like SPT2349-56, with the hope of unraveling the complexities of galaxy formation.

Topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

How Ghostly Particles Could Revolutionize Our Understanding of the Universe

Neutrinos: The Elusive Ghost Particle

Shutterstock / betibup33

The enigmatic neutrino, often considered a ghostly particle, could be reshaping our understanding of all particles and forces in the universe.

The Standard Model of particle physics stands as a monumental achievement in contemporary science, meticulously cataloging known particles and forces. However, physicists have long been aware of its deficiencies and are eager to establish a more cohesive model. Notably, it fails to tie gravity to the other three fundamental forces.

During stress tests that expose weaknesses in the Standard Model, researchers can pinpoint areas in need of further exploration. Francesca Dorday and her team at the National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN) in Cagliari, Italy, have identified a potential flaw by investigating the mysterious behaviors of neutrinos.

“In every assessment of the Standard Model over the past two decades, we’ve consistently confirmed its predictions. This necessitates the derivation of more precise outcomes, especially since neutrinos exhibit unique characteristics,” Dorday explains.

Neutrinos possess an extraordinarily small mass—so insignificant that they were once considered massless. They interact so weakly with matter that they pass through substances undetected—akin to tiny phantoms. Nonetheless, recent investigations have managed to quantify some minimal electromagnetic interactions of neutrinos using a measurement known as the charge radius. Neutrinos can also engage with other particles via the weak nuclear force.

Dorday and her team have meticulously examined the nuances of neutrino interactions and charge radius through numerous experiments, gathering data from neutrinos produced by nuclear reactors, particle accelerators, and even the nuclear fusion activities within the Sun. Additionally, by utilizing detectors created for dark matter, they found sensitivity to neutrinos.

Team member Nicola Calgioli remarked that compiling this data was challenging but ultimately offered a comprehensive overview of our understanding of neutrinos. “We essentially integrated all available data,” added Christoph Ternes from Italy’s Gran Sasso Scientific Institute, who collaborated on this project.

While the value of the neutrino’s charge radius matched Standard Model expectations, researchers uncovered an intriguing phenomenon concerning the particles’ weak interactions. They observed “mathematical degeneracy,” meaning that both the Standard Model and a slight variant could explain the findings equally well. Strikingly, further examination revealed that the alternative model might fit the data even more closely, hinting at a long-anticipated crack in our current grasp of particle physics.

Despite the new analysis not achieving a definitive statistical breakthrough, it represents an initial foray into rigorously evaluating the Standard Model through neutrinos. Researchers aspire to gather additional data to substantiate or refute their findings as new detection technologies emerge. If these discrepancies persist, the implications could be profound.

“Identifying flaws may necessitate a complete re-evaluation of established principles,” cautions Calgioli. New models beyond the Standard Model might postulate entirely new particle types with interactions congruent with the neutrino dynamics revealed in the research.

Omar Miranda underscores that capturing neutrino interactions, particularly at ultra-low energies, is exceedingly complex, now made feasible thanks to advancements in detector technology, including those designed for dark matter research. He emphasizes the significance of neutrino detection as a litmus test for the Standard Model.

The new findings call on particle physicists to conduct ultra-precise neutrino experiments across various settings in the coming years, assert the authors. As Jose Valle from the University of Valencia, Spain points out, better measurements of neutrinos’ electromagnetic properties are still essential to uncover their internal structure.

CERN and Mont Blanc: Unraveling Dark Matter

Discover CERN, Europe’s leading hub for particle physics, situated near the picturesque city of Geneva, where researchers operate the renowned Large Hadron Collider.

Topics:

  • neutrino/
  • particle physics

Source: www.newscientist.com

Massive Black Holes: Potential Remnants from the Early Universe Explained

Primordial black holes likely formed shortly after the Big Bang.

Shutterstock/Mohd. Afuza

An exceptionally massive black hole from the early universe may represent a type of exotic starless black hole first theorized by Stephen Hawking.

In August, Boyuan Liu and his team from the University of Cambridge used the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) to uncover a peculiar galaxy named Abell 2744-QSO1. This ancient galaxy, dating back 13 billion years, harbored a black hole around 50 million times the mass of our Sun but hosted extremely few stars.

“This contradicts traditional theories which dictate that stars must form prior to or simultaneously with black holes,” Liu explained. Typically, black holes are believed to evolve when massive stars exhaust their fuel and undergo gravitational collapse.

Liu and his team conducted initial simulations suggesting that QSO1 might have originated as a primordial black hole—an exotic concept introduced by Stephen Hawking and Bernard Carr in 1974. Unlike conventional black holes, primordial black holes are thought to form from density fluctuations shortly after the Big Bang.

While most primordial black holes likely evaporated by the time of the JWST’s observations, some might have persisted, evolving into larger black holes like QSO1.

Although Liu and his team’s calculations align broadly with their observations, they remain relatively simple and do not factor in the intricate interactions among primordial black holes, gas clouds, and stars.

Now, the authors have employed advanced simulations to investigate how primordial black holes grew in the universe’s infancy. They analyzed how gas dynamics influenced the formation of early primordial black holes and how interactions with newly formed and dying stars affected them.

Their predictions about the black hole’s ultimate mass and the heavy elements present in it are congruent with the findings from QSO1.

“It’s not conclusive, but it represents a compelling possibility,” Liu stated. “These observations suggest that established black hole formation theories may not fully explain the phenomenon, making the notion of a significant primordial black hole in the early universe increasingly plausible.”

Simulations indicate that primordial black holes could be a feasible origin for QSO1, according to Roberto Maiorino, a team member involved in the discovery of black holes. “The alignment of their predicted properties with those of QSO1, in terms of black hole mass, stellar mass, and chemical composition, is both intriguing and promising.”

However, standard models of primordial black holes typically predict that their maximum mass should be around a million solar masses, while Maiorino pointed out that QSO1 is 50 times larger. “Nevertheless, it’s plausible that these primordial black holes are densely concentrated, allowing them to merge and grow rapidly,” he noted.

A further challenge arises from the requirement that for a primordial black hole to initially collapse, a burst of high-energy radiation, like that from a nearby supernova, is essential; however, no potential sources have been identified near QSO1, according to Maiorino.

Mysteries of the Universe: Cheshire, England

Experience a weekend with some of the brightest scientific minds as you delve into the universe’s mysteries, featuring an exciting itinerary that includes a tour of the iconic Lovell Telescope.

Topics:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Did Black Holes Exist in the Early Universe? Exploring the Evidence

Gas ball with a black hole

A New Discovery: Gas Balls with Black Holes at Their Centers

Shutterstock / Nazarii_Neshcherenskyi

The early universe is rich with enigmatic star-like gas balls powered by central black holes, a discovery that has astounded astronomers and may clarify some of the most significant mysteries unveiled by the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST).

Upon initiating its observations of the universe’s first billion years, JWST uncovered compact, red galaxies that exhibited extraordinary brightness—galaxies unlike those found in our local universe. Previous interpretations suggested that these “small red dots” (LRDs) were either supermassive black holes engulfed in dust or densely packed star galaxies; however, these theories inadequately explained the light signals detected by JWST.

Recently, astronomers suggested that LRDs might actually be dense gas clusters with a black hole at their core, termed “black hole stars.” According to Anna de Graaf from Harvard University, as matter falls into a black hole, it emits immense gravitational energy, causing the surrounding gas to radiate light like stars. While this energy is distinct from nuclear fusion typical in stars, it results in a luminous mass of dense gas potentially billions of times brighter than our sun, according to de Graaf.

Despite some early evidence supporting this idea, a consensus remained elusive. Now, de Graaf and colleagues have reviewed the most extensive sample of LRDs since JWST’s launch, encompassing over 100 galaxies, and propose that these entities are best classified as black hole stars. “Although the term black hole star is still debated, there’s growing agreement within the scientific community that we’re observing accreting black holes enveloped by dense gas,” de Graaf noted.

When examining the spectrum of light emitted by an LRD, the observed patterns more closely resemble those from a uniform surface (blackbody) characteristic of stars, contrasting with the intricate and varied spectra from galaxies emitting light produced by a combination of stars, dust, gas, and central black holes.

“The black hole star concept has intrigued scientists for a while and, despite initial skepticism, is proving to be a viable explanation,” states Gillian Bellovary of the American Museum of Natural History. “Using a star-like model simplifies the framework for interpreting observations without necessitating extraordinary physics.”

In September, de Graaf’s team also identified another single LRD displaying a striking peak in the light frequency spectrum, which they dubbed “the cliff.” “We discovered spectral characteristics unexplainable by existing models,” de Graaf explained. “This pushes us to reevaluate our understanding and explore alternative theories.”

Presently, many astronomers agree that LRDs likely operate like vast star formations; however, de Graaf cautions that substantiating the black hole hypothesis presents challenges. “The core is hidden within a dense, optically thick envelope, obscuring what’s inside,” de Graaf explains. “Their brightness leads us to suspect they harbor black holes.”

A potential method to affirm their nature as black holes involves studying the temporal changes in emitted light, observing whether they fluctuate akin to known black holes in our universe, as noted by Western Hanki from Cambridge University. “We note brightness variances over brief intervals, yet there’s scant evidence of such variations in most LRD cases.”

While JWST’s observational timeframe is limited, scrutinizing long-lived light fluctuations from LRDs may yield insights. A new study by Sun Fengwu and his team at Harvard recently uncovered a gravitational lens, an LRD that bends light around a massive galaxy between us and the object. This lens generated four distinct images of the original LRD, mimicking observations over 130 years and suggesting brightness variations similar to known pulsating stars, aligning with the hypothesis of black hole stars. Sun and his team opted not to comment for this article.

Although utilizing gravitational lenses to observe LRDs at different times is clever, Bellovary notes that other factors might account for brightness changes. “The data may not suffice to validate their conclusion. While I’m not dismissing their claims, I think there may be alternative explanations for the observed variations.”

If it turns out these galaxies are indeed black hole stars, de Graaf warns we’ll need to devise a new model addressing their origin and what they evolve into, given the absence of equivalent systems in our local universe. “This could represent a new growth phase for supermassive black holes,” she concludes. “The nature of these events and their significance to the final mass of black holes remains an open question.”

Explore the Mysteries of the Universe in Cheshire, England

Join leading scientists for an exciting weekend dedicated to uncovering the universe’s mysteries, including a tour of the iconic Lovell Telescope.

Topics:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Astronomers Uncover Direct Evidence of Supermassive Stars in the Early Universe

Astronomers utilizing the NASA/ESA/CSA James Webb Space Telescope have identified the chemical signature of a protostar with a mass between 1,000 and 10,000 times that of the Sun in GS 3073, an early galaxy with a redshift of 5.55 (approximately 1 billion years post-Big Bang).



A primordial supermassive star in the early universe. Image credit: Gemini AI.

In 2022, it was suggested by astronomers that supermassive stars formed naturally within turbulent flows of rare cold gas during the early universe, thus accounting for the existence of quasars less than a billion years after the Big Bang.

“Our recent finding helps to unravel a cosmic enigma that has persisted for two decades,” stated Dr. Daniel Whalen of the University of Portsmouth.

“GS 3073 offers the first observational proof of these colossal stars.”

“These astronomical behemoths would have radiated intensely for a brief period before collapsing into enormous black holes, leaving behind chemical imprints detectable billions of years later.”

“Much like Earth’s dinosaurs, they were massive and rudimentary, with lifespans spanning just 250,000 years—an ephemeral moment in cosmic time.”

The cornerstone of this discovery involved assessing the nitrogen-to-oxygen ratio in the GS 3073 galaxy.

This galaxy presents a nitrogen-to-oxygen ratio of 0.46, significantly exceeding what can be accounted for by any known type of star or stellar explosion.

“Chemical abundances serve as the universe’s fingerprints, and the pattern from GS 3073 is unlike that produced by typical stars,” remarked Dr. Devesh Nandal, an astronomer at the University of Virginia, Harvard University, and the Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.

“This unprecedented nitrogen concentration aligns with a single known source: protostars that are thousands of times more massive than the Sun.”

“This suggests that the first generation of stars included genuine supermassive objects that contributed to the creation of early galaxies and may have planted the seeds for contemporary supermassive black holes.”

The researchers performed modeling of stars with masses between 1,000 and 10,000 solar masses to predict their evolution and the elements they would produce.

They identified a specific mechanism for generating substantial nitrogen. (i) These colossal stars fuse helium, forming carbon in their cores. (ii) Carbon seeps into the outer shell, where hydrogen is undergoing fusion. (iii) Carbon merges with hydrogen, resulting in nitrogen through the carbon/nitrogen/oxygen (CNO) cycle. (iv) Convection disseminates nitrogen throughout the star. (v) Eventually, this nitrogen-rich material is expelled into space, enriching the surrounding gas.

This mechanism spans millions of years during the star’s helium burning phase, leading to the excess nitrogen observed in GS 3073.

The team’s models predict that upon demise, these massive stars do not explode. Instead, they collapse directly into gigantic black holes with masses reaching thousands of solar masses.

Interestingly, GS 3073 harbors an actively feeding black hole at its core, which could potentially be the remnant of one of these supermassive first stars.

If validated, this would simultaneously clarify two mysteries: the origin of nitrogen and the formation of black holes.

The study also revealed that this nitrogen signature is exclusive to specific mass ranges.

“Stars below 1,000 solar masses or above 10,000 solar masses do not generate chemical patterns suitable for this signature, indicating a ‘sweet spot’ for such enrichment,” scientists noted.

of study Published in Astrophysics Journal Letter.

_____

Devesh Nandal others. 2025. A protostar between 1000 and 10,000 MSun created a nitrogen surplus in GS 3073 at z = 5.55. APJL 994, L11; doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ae1a63

Source: www.sci.news

Uncovering the Universe: Why We Just Recently Realized It’s Dark Instead of Bright

Adobe Stock Photo/Phoebe Watts

Set against the vastness of space, our blue planet emerges above the desolate lunar landscape. This iconic photograph, “Earthrise,” was captured by Apollo 8 astronaut Bill Anders on Christmas Eve 1968.

Nearly six decades later, we regard this image as part of our narrative. Yet, envision a different earthrise where space is not a dark backdrop, but a vivid blue, akin to a sunny sky. Odd as it may appear, this was the vision held by many Europeans for centuries.

Our comprehension of the cosmos has evolved significantly over time, influencing how we perceive our place within it. The shift from an earth-centered to a sun-centered universe, along with the transition from a finite to an infinite cosmos, prompted a profound reevaluation of humanity’s role in the grand scheme. The change from a vibrant to a dim universe is equally crucial, yet it remains largely overlooked in our historical narratives.

Recently, through my scholarly work in literary and scientific history, I have sought to trace the timeline of this transformation. At what point did our universe metaphorically turn dark? What did this shift imply for humanity?

Earthrise—a photograph from the moon’s surface in 1968 showcasing the notion that space is dark.

NASA

Reflect on the account given by Domingo González, the hero of Francis Godwin’s 1638 science fiction novel, The Man in the Moone. González travels to the moon in a swan-powered vehicle and notes a scarcity of stars. Even those he does see are dim. He observes, “It was always daytime for some reason, yet the stars appeared faint, similar to the moon’s glow in daylight.” Why are there fewer stars in his experience? Why do they appear washed out? Because, in his narrative, space is akin to the daytime sky, where the sun drowns out the luminosity of stars.

From our viewpoint, González’s reality seems inverted. In his portrayal, daytime reveals our true nature, while night conceals us within Earth’s shadow. Yet, ascending to space at midnight, we would eventually emerge from darkness into eternal daylight.

In Francis Godwin’s The Man in the Moone, protagonist Domingo González embarks for the moon in a swan-powered craft.

Houghton Library

While González omits mention of a shadow, we glimpse it in another early space narrative by John Milton, Paradise Lost. As Milton’s Satan nears Earth, he remarks upon “a whirling canopy / a spreading shadow of the night.” If you visualize pre-modern eras, adding this shadow to your image of earthrise transforms it. A dark cone emerges from the jagged globe, plunging into the azure sky and vanishing beneath the lunar horizon.

Additional authors elucidate why the Universe is imagined as not merely bright, but blue-hued. The prevalent rationale is that the “firmament” was envisioned as blue. Walter Charlton, a contemporary of Milton, remarked this notion was widely shared “by many transcendental thinkers, as well as the average populace.” Observing the daytime sky, they believed they were witnessing the universe’s limit.

The Path to Earthrise

This luminescent universe also manifests in visual art. A comparison with Apollo 8 is particularly pertinent. Hours after capturing earthrise, the crew transmitted radio messages from lunar orbit to Earth. Commander Frank Bowman extended Christmas wishes and recited the biblical creation tale. For the first time, humanity achieved a god-like vantage point of the radiant blue planet glistening against the abyss. In contrast, when pre-modern artists portrayed these scripture moments, they often rendered a dim planet against a bright celestial expanse. To reimagine earthrise, picture one of these shadowed Earths ascending above the lunar surface instead of the iconic “blue marble.”

It was not just poets and artists who envisioned such a realm. Philosophers and scientists also entertained the concept. Aristotle remarked on “the shadow of the earth (termed night).” Two millennia later, Copernicus similarly wrote, “While the rest of the universe is illuminated and radiant, the night signifies nothing but the shadow of the Earth, extending in a cone and culminating at a point.”

This perspective was not unreasonable; early European scholars lacked compelling evidence to argue otherwise, particularly concerning the light-refracting properties of the universe and Earth’s atmosphere. Without such evidence, why suspect that night predominates and day a rarity? What led pre-modern Christians to diverge from millennia of tradition and perceive heaven—not as eternal brightness, but infinite darkness?

A 13th-century manuscript depicting a gray Earth casting a black shadow against a blue universe (left) and a 15th-century manuscript showcasing the newly created Earth as a black marble surrounded by blue cosmos (right).

Heritage Image Partnership Ltd/Alamy; National Library of France

This does not imply that luminous spaces were universally accepted in pre-modern thought. For instance, scholars within the Islamic tradition favored the concept of dark spaces starting in the 9th century, yet this perspective seems to have been less influential in the West. In any case, the notion of a dark universe had to be re-established among 17th-century European thinkers.

During this period, significant advancements in atmospheric science emerged. Notably, the term “atmosphere” was coined in the 17th century, with Walter Charlton among the first to utilize it in English. His view of the universe acts as a transitional development in this narrative: a universe that oscillates between brightness and darkness based on an observer’s orientation towards the sun. Although Charlton described a dark universe, he noted that it was “not nearly as deep blue as many presume,” and filled with countless tiny particles or “atoms,” which he speculated could impact visibility. In contrast, Otto von Guericke, who endorsed the infinite universe and conducted pioneering vacuum experiments, postulated that in an “unblemished” and “void” space, devoid of illuminated objects, we would perceive “nothing but shadows.”

Thereafter, dark space gained traction among European scientists and thinkers informed by these scientific advancements. However, this marks only part of the narrative, as visions of bright spaces lingered in cultural imaginations for centuries.

Fast forward to 1858, when astronomer James Gall envisioned his foray into the void for a Victorian audience, exclaiming, “As I look around me, how peculiar! The heavens are pitch black.” While Gall acknowledged the darkness of space, he doubted the audience’s awareness of this fact. It wasn’t a naive child or uninformed individual believing in a “giant blue sphere,” but the renowned literary historian David Masson in 1880 who clung to this isolated imagery, which persisted well into the 1920s, right at the brink of the Space Age.

Thus, we confront a dual narrative of a decline in our cosmic imagination alongside the unexpected evolution of these ideas. Some of the most striking evidence is found in literature, especially in space travel narratives, which were initially recognized by literary scholars such as C.S. Lewis and more recently John Leonard. Nevertheless, this aspect has yet to receive thorough investigation, and its cultural ramifications remain largely unexamined.

The implications are significant, often concealed in plain sight. Prominent images such as earthrise have reshaped our perceptions of our planet and its environmental context. The view of Earth as “perfect” and “blue” has also rendered it “fragile,” symbolizing the perils of nuclear conflict and climate change, as well as underscoring the call for political unity and ecological stewardship. What is less acknowledged, however, is that this transformation arose not only from a fresh perspective on Earth, but importantly on the vastness surrounding it.

For millennia, the entirety of Earth has been envisioned, represented, and contemplated. Yet, much of it was depicted within brilliant space, eliciting markedly different responses. Hence, the influence of earthrise was indeed more profound than commonly appreciated. The mass circulation of such imagery has obliterated even the faintest remnants of a once-bright universe and firmly imprinted its inversion into collective consciousness. The Earth stands not merely as “blue” or “fragile.” While it may appear thus against the cold, dark expanse surrounding it, it has transitioned into both a scientific reality and a cultural perception.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Supermassive Dark Matter Stars Could Be Hidden in the Early Universe

Exotic stars may be fueled by dark matter

remote vfx/getty images

We might be observing the earliest indications of peculiar stars that harness dark matter. These dark stars could provide explanations for some of the universe’s most enigmatic entities, and offer insights into the actual nature of dark matter itself.

Standard stars are birthed when a gas cloud collapses, leading to a core dense enough to initiate nuclear fusion. This fusion generates significant heat and energy, radiating into the surrounding gas and plasma.

Dark stars could have emerged in a similar fashion during the universe’s infancy, a period of higher density which also saw a notably concentrated presence of dark matter. If a gas cloud collapsing into a star contains substantial dark matter, it may begin to collide and dissipate prior to nuclear fusion, generating enough energy to illuminate the dark star and halt further collapse.

The process leading to the formation of dark stars is relatively straightforward, and currently, a team led by Katherine Freese from the University of Texas at Austin is exploring its potential outcome.

In an ordinary large star, once the hydrogen and helium are depleted, it continues fusing heavier elements until it runs out of energy and collapses into a black hole. The more mass the star contains, the quicker this transition occurs.

However, the same is not true for dark stars. “By incorporating dark matter into a star roughly the mass of the Sun, and sustaining it through dark matter decay rather than nuclear means, you can continuously nourish the star. Provided it receives enough dark matter, it won’t undergo the nuclear transformations that lead to complications,” explains George Fuller, a collaborator with Freese at the University of California, San Diego.

Despite this, general relativity imposes a limit on how long dark matter can preserve these unusual giants. Albert Einstein’s theory suggests that an object’s gravitational field does not increase linearly with mass; instead, gravity intensifies the gravitational force. Ultimately, an object may reach a mass at which it becomes unstable, with minor variations overpowering its gravitational pull and resulting in a collapse into a black hole. Researchers estimate this threshold for a dark star is between 1,000 and 10 million times the Sun’s mass.

This mass range makes supermassive dark stars prime candidates for addressing one of the early universe’s profound mysteries: the existence of supermassive black holes. These giants were spotted relatively early in the universe’s history, but their rapid formation remains a puzzle. One prevailing theory posits that they didn’t arise from typical stars, but rather from some colossal “seed.”

“If a black hole weighs 100 solar masses, how could it possibly grow to a billion solar masses in just a few hundred million years? This is implausible if black holes were formed solely from standard stars,” asserts Freese. “Conversely, this situation changes significantly if the origin is a relatively large seed.” Such faint stars could serve as those seeds.

Yet, the enigmas of the early universe extend beyond supermassive black holes that dark stars could elucidate. The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has unveiled two other unforeseen object types, referred to as the little red dot and the blue monster, both appearing at substantial distances. The immediate hypothesis for these is that they are compact galaxies.

However, like supermassive black holes, these objects exist too far away and too early in universal history for simple formation explanations. Based on observations, Freese and her associates propose that both the little red dot and the blue monster may represent individual, immensely massive dark stars.

If they indeed are dark stars, they would display particular clues in their light. This aspect pertains to specific wavelengths that dark stars should ostensibly absorb. Normal stars and galaxies dense with them are too hot to capture that light.

Freese and colleagues have found possible indicators of this absorption in initial JWST observations of several distant entities; however, the data is too inconclusive to confirm its existence. “Currently, of all our candidates, two could potentially fit the spectrum: a solitary supermassive dark star or an entire galaxy of regular stars,” Freese notes. “Examining this dip in the spectrum, we’re convinced it points to a dark star rather than a conventional star-filled galaxy. But for now, we only possess a faint hint.”

While it remains uncertain if we have definitively detected a dark star, this development marks progress. “It isn’t a definitive finding, but it certainly fuels motivation for ongoing inquiries, and some aspects of what JWST has been examining seem to align with that direction,” remarks Dan Hooper from the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Establishing whether these entities are genuinely dark stars necessitates numerous more observations, ideally with enhanced sensitivity; however, it remains ambiguous whether JWST can achieve the level of detail required for such distant galaxies or dark stars.

“Confirming the existence of dark stars would be a remarkable breakthrough,” emphasizes Volodymyr Takistov from the High Energy Accelerator Research Organization in Japan. This could facilitate new observational avenues into foundational physics. This is particularly true if dark stars are recognized as seeds for supermassive black holes. Freese, Fuller, and their team deduced that the mass at which a black hole collapses correlates with the mass of the dark matter particle annihilating at its center, implying that supermassive black holes could serve as metrics to evaluate or at least restrict dark matter properties. Of course, validating the existence of dark stars is the first priority. “Even if these entities exist, their occurrence is rare,” Hooper states. “They are uncommon, yet significant.”

Exploring the Mysteries of the Universe: Cheshire, England

Join some of the brightest minds in science for a weekend dedicated to unraveling the universe’s mysteries, featuring a tour of the legendary Lovell Telescope.

Topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Research Indicates Our Universe Is Already Entering a Slowdown Phase

A recent study from Yonsei University in Seoul, South Korea, challenges the previously accepted notion that dark energy is causing the accelerated movement of distant galaxies away from us. The researchers found no evidence supporting the idea that the universe is currently accelerating. If validated, this finding could significantly alter our understanding of dark energy, address the “Hubble strain,” and provide insights into the universe’s past and future.

The expansion of the universe may be slowing down, not accelerating. Image credit: M. Weiss / Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.

For over three decades, astronomers have generally accepted that the universe is expanding at an increasing rate due to a hidden force dubbed dark energy, which functions as a sort of anti-gravity.

This conclusion, derived from distance measurements of far-off galaxies using Type Ia supernovae, earned the Nobel Prize in Physics in 2011.

However, Professor Yongwook Lee of Yonsei University and his team have introduced new evidence suggesting that Type Ia supernovae, once thought to be the universe’s “standard candle,” are significantly affected by the age of their progenitor stars.

“Our findings indicate that the universe is currently in a phase of decelerating expansion, and that dark energy is evolving at a much faster rate than previously assumed,” stated Professor Lee.

“If verified, these outcomes would signify the most substantial shift in cosmology since the identification of dark energy 27 years ago.”

Even after adjusting for brightness, supernovae from younger star populations seem systematically dimmer, while those from older populations appear brighter.

Utilizing a more extensive sample of 300 host galaxies, the researchers validated these findings with remarkable significance (99.999% confidence), indicating that the dimming of distant supernovae is influenced not only by cosmological factors but also by stellar astrophysical characteristics.

After correcting for this systematic bias, the supernova data no longer aligned with the classic ΛCDM cosmology model that includes a cosmological constant.

Instead, it aligns more closely with a new model backed by the Dark Energy Spectroscopy Instrument (DESI) project, based on Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO) and Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) data.

Both the adjusted supernova data and the results from BAO+CMB demonstrate that dark energy diminishes and evolves significantly over time.

Importantly, when the corrected supernova data were integrated with BAO and CMB findings, the traditional ΛCDM model was decisively ruled out.

Most notably, this comprehensive analysis reveals that the universe is not accelerating as much as once believed, but has already transitioned into a state of slowing expansion.

“The DESI project has yielded significant results by merging unadjusted supernova data with baryon acoustic vibration measurements, concluding that while the universe will decelerate in the future, it is still accelerating at present,” remarked Professor Lee.

“Conversely, our analysis, which incorporates an age-bias correction, indicates that the universe is already entering a slowing phase today.”

“Surprisingly, this aligns with predictions made independently from BAO analyses, which has yet to receive much attention.”

To further validate their findings, the researchers are now conducting an evolution-free test using only supernovae from young, contemporaneous host galaxies across the entire redshift range.

Initial results already support their primary conclusion.

“With the Vera C. Rubin Observatory set to discover more than 20,000 new supernova host galaxies within the next five years, accurate age measurements will provide a more robust and conclusive examination of supernova cosmology,” stated Yonsei University professor Chul Chung.

The team’s paper published today in Royal Astronomical Society Monthly Notices.

_____

Song Joon Hyuk et al. 2025. Strong founder age bias in supernova cosmology – II. Alignment of DESI BAO with signs of a non-accelerating universe. MNRAS 544 (1): 975-987; doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf1685

Source: www.sci.news

New Study Concludes: The Universe Is Not a Computer Simulation

A collaborative team of physicists from Canada, the United States, the United Kingdom, and Italy has mathematically demonstrated that our universe operates on a fundamental understanding unattainable by any algorithm.



Faizal et al. The fundamental nature of reality indicates it operates beyond the capabilities of computer simulations. Image credit: Gemini AI.

“The concept of simulating the universe has been suggested,” remarked Dr. Mir Faizal, a physicist at the University of British Columbia Okanagan.

“If such simulations were possible, then a simulated universe could potentially give rise to life and create its own simulations.”

“This recursive concept raises doubts about whether our universe is the original one or merely a simulation nested within another.”

“Previously, this notion was deemed outside the realm of scientific inquiry.”

“However, our recent findings demonstrate that it can indeed be addressed through scientific methods.”

“Our investigation hinges on the intriguing nature of reality itself.”

“Modern physics has evolved beyond Newton’s tangible ‘objects’ moving through space. With Einstein’s theory of relativity superseding Newtonian mechanics, quantum mechanics has reshaped our understanding yet again.”

The leading-edge theory today, quantum gravity, proposes that even space and time may not be fundamental; rather, they emerge from a deeper source: pure information.

“This information exists in what physicists refer to as the Platonic realm, a more fundamental mathematical basis than our physical universe. Space and time arise from this realm.”

The authors have shown that despite this information-centric foundation, reality cannot be encapsulated solely through calculations.

Utilizing powerful mathematical theorems, including Gödel’s incompleteness theorem, they established that a full and consistent account of all phenomena demands what they call non-algorithmic understanding.

“To illustrate: Computers follow recipes step by step, regardless of complexity. Yet, certain truths can only be comprehended through non-algorithmic understanding, which does not adhere to a predetermined sequence of logical steps,” they explained.

“These Gödel truths are genuine, yet they cannot be validated through computation.”

“Consider this straightforward statement: This statement cannot be proven true.”

“If it’s provable, then it’s false, rendering the logic inconsistent. If it’s not provable, then it is true. Nevertheless, any system that attempts to prove it will be incomplete. Hence, pure computation will fail.”

“Our study confirms that it’s impossible to describe the entirety of physical reality using the computational theory of quantum gravity,” stated Dr. Faizal.

“Thus, a physically complete and consistent theory cannot emerge solely from calculations.”

“Instead, we require a non-algorithmic understanding, which is more fundamental than the computational laws of quantum gravity, and thus more fundamental than spacetime itself.”

“Could the computational rules of the Platonic realm resemble those of a computer simulation? Might that realm itself not be subject to simulation?”

“No. Yet our findings unveil something more profound.”

“Through mathematical theorems associated with incompleteness and indefinability, we demonstrate that a consistently complete portrayal of reality cannot be achieved through mere calculation.”

“It necessitates a non-algorithmic understanding, which by its nature transcends algorithmic computation and cannot be simulated. Therefore, this universe cannot be a simulation.”

The research team asserts this discovery has significant implications.

“The fundamental laws of physics cannot be confined within space and time, as they are derived from them,” asserted Dr. Lawrence M. Kraus, a researcher at the Origin Project Foundation.

“For a long time, it has been hoped that a truly fundamental theory of everything would eventually describe all physical phenomena through calculations grounded in these laws.”

“However, we have demonstrated that this is not feasible. A more profound approach is required to coherently explain reality: a form of understanding referred to as non-algorithmic understanding.”

“All simulations are inherently algorithmic and must adhere to programmed instructions,” Dr. Faizal remarked.

“However, the universe cannot be and never will be a simulation, as the core level of reality is rooted in non-algorithmic understanding.”

For more information, refer to the study published in the June 2025 issue of Journal of Holography Applications in Physics.

_____

Mir Faizal et al. 2025. The consequences of undecidability in physics for the theory of everything. Journal of Holography Applications in Physics 5(2):10-21; doi: 10.22128/jap.2025.1024.1118

Source: www.sci.news

Physicists Suggest a Cosmic ‘Knot’ Could Have Influenced the Early Universe Briefly

Knots are prevalent in various fields of mathematics and physics today. A collaborative team of Japanese and German physicists proposes the existence of a “knot-dominated epoch” in the universe’s early days, suggesting that knots were essential building blocks during this time. This intriguing hypothesis can be investigated through gravitational wave observations. Additionally, they theorize that the conclusion of this period will involve the collapse of the knot due to quantum tunneling, leading to an Asymmetry between matter and antimatter in space.



Model proposed by Eto et al.. It suggests a brief, knot-dominated epoch when these intertwined energy fields outweighed everything else, a scenario that can be investigated through gravitational wave signals. Image credit: Muneto Nitta / Hiroshima University.

Mathematically, knots are defined as closed curves embedded in three-dimensional space and can be found not just in tying neckties but across numerous scientific disciplines today, as noted by Lord Kelvin.

Although his theory postulated that atoms are knots of etheric vortices was ultimately refuted, it sparked advancements in knot theory and its application in multiple areas of physics.

“Our study tackles one of the core mysteries of physics: why the universe is predominantly composed of matter rather than antimatter,” remarked Professor Munehito Nitta, a physicist at Hiroshima University and Keio University.

“This question is crucial as it relates directly to the existence of stars, galaxies, and ourselves.”

“The Big Bang was expected to produce equal amounts of matter and antimatter, with the intent that each particle would annihilate its counterpart, leaving only radiation.”

“Yet, the universe is overwhelmingly composed of matter, with only trace amounts of antimatter.”

“Calculations indicate that to achieve the matter we see today, only one extra particle of matter is needed for every billion matter-antimatter pairs.”

“Despite its remarkable achievements, the Standard Model of particle physics fails to resolve its inconsistencies.”

“That prediction is significantly off.”

“Unraveling the origin of the slight excess of matter, a phenomenon known as baryogenesis, remains one of the greatest unresolved enigmas in physics.”

By merging the measured baryon number minus lepton number (BL) symmetry with the Peksey-Quinn (PQ) symmetry, Professor Nitta and his associates demonstrated that the knot could have spontaneously formed in the early universe, resulting in the observed surplus.

These two well-studied extensions to the standard model address some of its most confounding gaps.

PQ symmetry offers a solution to the strong CP problem, which explains the absence of the small electric dipole moments that theories predict for neutrons, simultaneously introducing axions, a leading candidate for dark matter.

BL symmetry, conversely, elucidates why neutrinos, elusive particles that can seamlessly pass through entire planets, possess mass.

Maintaining the PQ symmetry globally, rather than merely measuring it, safeguards the delicate axion physics that addresses the strong CP problem.

In physics, “measuring” a symmetry implies allowing it to operate freely at any locale and moment in time.

However, this regional freedom requires nature to introduce new mechanisms for force transmission to clarify the equations.

By acknowledging BL symmetry, the researchers not only validated the existence of heavy right-handed neutrinos (crucial for averting anomalies in the theory and central to the primary burr formation model) but also incorporated superconducting behavior, likely providing the magnetic foundation for some of the universe’s earliest knots.

As the universe cooled following the Big Bang, its symmetry may have fractured through a series of phase transitions, leaving behind string-like defects called cosmic strings, which some cosmologists theorize may still persist.

Even though thinner than a proton, a cosmic string can stretch across a mountain.

As the universe expanded, these writhing filaments would twist and intertwine, preserving traces of the primal conditions that once existed.

The breakdown of BL symmetry formed a flux tube string, while PQ symmetry resulted in a flux-free superfluid vortex.

This contrast renders them compatible.

The BL flux tube grants the Chern-Simons coupling of the PQ superfluid vortex a point of attachment.

This coupling subsequently channels the PQ superfluid vortex into the BL flux tube, counteracting the tension that might otherwise disrupt the loop.

The outcome is a metastable, topologically locked structure known as a knot soliton.

“No prior studies had simultaneously considered these two symmetries,” notes Professor Nitta.

“In a way, our good fortune lay in this. By integrating them, we uncovered a stable knot.”

While radiation diminishes energy as waves traverse through space and time, knots exhibit properties akin to matter and dissipate energy far more gradually.

They subsequently surpassed all other forms, heralding an era of knot domination, where their energy density eclipsed that of radiation in the universe.

However, this dominance was short-lived. Ultimately, the knot succumbed to quantum tunneling, an elusive process where particles slip through energy barriers as though they were nonexistent.

This decay yielded heavy dextral neutrinos, a consequence of the inherent BL symmetry within its framework.

These colossal, elusive particles eventually transformed into lighter and more stable variations that favored matter over antimatter, shaping the universe we recognize today.

“Essentially, this decay releases a cascade of particles, including right-handed neutrinos, scalar particles, and gauge particles,” explained Dr. Masaru Hamada, a physicist at the German Electron Synchrotron Institute and Keio University.

“Among them, right-handed neutrinos are particularly noteworthy since their decay can inherently generate a discrepancy between matter and antimatter.”

“These massive neutrinos decompose into lighter particles, such as electrons and photons, sparking a secondary cascade that reheats the universe.”

“In this manner, they can be regarded as the ancestors of all matter in the universe today, including our own bodies, while knots might be considered our forebears.”

Once the researchers delved into the mathematics underlying the model—analyzing how efficiently the knot produced right-handed neutrinos, the mass of those neutrinos, and the degree of heat generated post-collapse—the observed matter-antimatter imbalance naturally emerged from their equations.

Rearranging the equations, with an estimated mass of 1012 gigaelectronvolts (GeV) for heavy dextral neutrinos, and assuming that most energy retained by the knot was utilized to generate these particles, the model yielded a natural reheating temperature of 100 GeV.

This temperature fortuitously coincides with the final opportunity for the universe to produce matter.

Should the universe cool beyond this point, the electroweak reactions that convert neutrino discrepancies into matter would cease permanently.

Reheating to 100 GeV may have also reshaped the cosmic gravitational wave spectrum, shifting it toward higher frequencies.

Forthcoming observatories such as Europe’s Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA), the United States’ Cosmic Explorer, and Japan’s Decihertz Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (DECIGO) may someday detect these subtle tonal variations.

Dr. Minoru Eto, a physicist at Yamagata University, Keio University, and Hiroshima University, remarked, “The cosmic string is a variant of topological soliton, an entity defined by a quantity that remains unchanged regardless of how much it is twisted or stretched.”

“This characteristic not only guarantees stability but also indicates that our results are not confined to the specifics of the model.”

“While this work is still theoretical, we believe it represents a significant advancement towards future development, as the foundational topology remains constant.”

Although Lord Kelvin initially proposed that knots were fundamental components of matter, the researchers assert that their findings present the first realistic particle physics model in which knots could significantly contribute to the origin of matter.

“The next step involves refining our theoretical models and simulations to more accurately forecast the formation and collapse of these knots, connecting their signatures with observable signals,” said Professor Nitta.

“In particular, upcoming gravitational wave experiments like LISA, Cosmic Explorer, and DECIGO will enable the testing of whether the universe indeed experienced a knot-dominated era.”

The team’s work appears in the journal Physical Review Letters.

_____

Minoru Eto et al. 2025. Tying the Knot in Particle Physics. Physics. Pastor Rhett 135, 091603; doi: 10.1103/s3vd-brsn

Source: www.sci.news

Is the Universe Just One Massive Black Hole?

Is this an example of the entire universe?

alamy

Here’s a glimpse from the elusive newsletter of space-time. Each month, we let physicists and mathematicians share intriguing ideas stemming from the universe’s far corners. To join this exploration, Sign up for Losing Space and Time here.

“So you have written a book on black holes?”

The stranger sips their cocktail. We are mingling at a gathering, showcasing our conversations. I nodded slightly, mixing my piña colada.

“Well then,” the stranger continues, their gaze fixed intently on me. Is it truly the case that the entire universe resembles a black hole?”

It’s a familiar inquiry. This question often arises when I mention my years spent at observatories, engaging with scientists about our understanding of these cosmic giants.

People are naturally curious. The media frequently reports on distant galaxies coming into view as we gaze out into space. Videos sharing these concepts amass millions of views on platforms like YouTube. Though it seems like fiction, the scientific exploration of this notion began as early as 1972, when physicist Raj Kumar Pathria submitted a letter to Nature titled “The Universe as a Black Hole.” This topic has surfaced repeatedly since then.

So, is it feasible?

How to create a black hole

In simple terms, black holes are regions in space where gravity is so intense that not even light can escape.

These enigmatic entities were first mathematically described by astronomer Karl Schwarzschild during World War I. Amidst the sounds of battle on the Western Front, he was intrigued by how Albert Einstein’s groundbreaking general relativity predicted planetary dynamics and stellar structures.

Schwarzschild derived a formula detailing how space and time behave in ways that defy common experience, creating areas that would be termed black holes.

This discovery provided profound insights into black hole dynamics. It requires a particular mass, like that of a human, planet, or star, compressed within a volume determined by Schwarzschild’s formula, et voilà! A black hole emerges.

The critical volume varies with the object’s mass. For a human being, this volume is minuscule, a hundred times smaller than a proton. For Earth, it’s akin to a golf ball, while for the Sun, the volume resembles the size of downtown Los Angeles (approximately 6 km, or just under 4 miles).

Creating black holes is challenging. Under typical conditions, materials tend not to compress to incredibly high densities. Only extreme cosmic events, like the supernova explosion of a massive star, can compel matter to collapse into a black hole.

Interestingly, the black holes formed from dying stars come from extremely dense matter, whereas the much larger supermassive black holes at the centers of galaxies possess much lower densities. According to Schwarzschild’s equation, bigger black holes actually have less average density than air!

So what about the universe itself? Given that it consists largely of empty space, can such density relate to that of black holes?

Polarized light from the cosmic microwave background

ESA/Planck Collaboration

Measuring Space

With the help of Schwarzschild’s formula, astronomers can ascertain whether an object is a black hole. First, determine its mass. Next, ascertain the volume. If the object’s mass is contained within a volume smaller than that specified by Schwarzschild’s equation, it qualifies as a black hole.

Now, applying this concept to the entire universe requires knowledge of its mass and volume. However, determining the universe’s total size is impossible, as wandering with a cosmic ruler isn’t feasible. Instead, we can observe light and particles that come to us from the cosmos.

The oldest light we detect originates from the cosmic microwave background, which was produced a mere 380,000 years after the Big Bang. As the universe expands, the origin of this light is now astronomically distant. In fact, the total distance light has traveled since the Big Bang allows us to see an observable universe with a diameter of about 93 billion light years.

Through rigorous measurements over many years, astronomers estimate the mass contained within this volume to be approximately 1054 kg (that’s a 1 followed by 54 zeros).

Next, let’s calculate the hypothetical size of a black hole with this mass using Schwarzschild’s formula. After some calculations, it turns out that such a black hole would be roughly three times larger than the observable universe, measuring around 300 billion light years across. Thus, simply from the observed mass and size of the universe, it seems to satisfy the criteria of being a black hole.

“Wow,” exclaimed the curious stranger at the cocktail party, “Does this mean the universe is indeed a black hole?”

“Not so fast, my friend,” I replied. To grasp this question fully, we must delve deeper into the nature of black holes.

Into the Void

Black holes are peculiar. One of their odd characteristics is that while they appear to be fixed sizes externally, they are continuously evolving internally. According to Schwarzschild’s formula, the internal space elongates in one dimension while compressing in the other two simultaneously. (If a black hole spins, its interior behaves differently, but that’s a tale for another time.)

Cosmologists refer to this structure as anisotropy. The term derives from tropos, meaning “direction,” and iso, meaning “equal,” alongside an, denoting negation. The dynamics of anisotropy within a black hole leads to one spatial direction expanding while the other two contract. This phenomenon, along with the infamous spaghettification, relates to the tidal forces experienced by any object drawn in.

In contrast, the universe expands isotropically (uniformly in all directions). Doesn’t that sound akin to the interior of a black hole?

However, this doesn’t eliminate the possibility of a “universe as a black hole.” Both structures share two pivotal features: the event horizon and singularity.

The event horizon marks a boundary beyond which light cannot escape. For a black hole, this signifies a point of no return for anything crossing this threshold. In the universe, space expands so swiftly that light from exceedingly distant galaxies cannot reach us.

The event horizon of our universe can be thought of as an inverted version of a black hole’s event horizon. The former limits our observation from the furthest reaches of space, while the latter confines us from seeing beyond its depths.

This reciprocal relationship is also observable in the singularity—the point where density and curvature of spacetime become infinite. According to Schwarzschild’s formula, the singularity is a destination for unfortunate astronauts crossing a black hole’s event horizon. Conversely, our cosmological models indicate that singularities exist in the past—backtracking the universe’s expansion leads every space point closer together, intensifying density. In this context, the beginnings of the Big Bang culminate in a singularity. So, for black holes, this mathematical singularity lies in the future; for our expanding universe, it exists in the past. In both instances, the complexity indicated signifies just how little we understand about these dense, enigmatic points.

Sum it all up—the disparities in expansion, event horizon, and singularity—paint a convincing picture of our universe: it’s not a black hole. It just doesn’t fit that label!

“But wait,” the stranger interjects, feeling disheartened, “I thought we calculated that the universe met the criteria for a black hole.”

“While the computations are indeed accurate,” I explain, “we observe that mathematical relationships akin to Schwarzschild’s also align within the context of an expanding universe. This isn’t exclusively characteristic of black holes.”

It suggests that strange phenomena exist at the largest cosmic scales, beyond our observational reach with telescopes. However, according to models of non-rotating, expanding black holes, our universe lacks the definitive traits that categorize it as a black hole. What to make of it? Personally, I view it as a testament to gravity’s versatility, crafting magnificent structures that encapsulate the essence of time and space.

Jonas Enander is a Swedish science writer with a PhD in physics. His newly released book Infinites Faced: Black Holes and Our Places on Earth (Atlantic Books/The Experiment, 2025) examines the impact of black holes both universally and on humanity. To delve further into these ideas, he created a video narrating the story using light blue illustrations.

The Mystery of the Universe: Cheshire, England

Spend a weekend with some of the brightest minds in science, exploring the mysteries of the universe all while visiting the iconic Lovell telescope.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

A Mysterious Streak in the Universe: The Enigma Remains Unsolved

The asymmetry in the average temperature of the cosmic microwave background is inconsistent with the standard model of cosmology

ESA/Planck Collaboration

Cosmic anomalies have puzzled scientists for years, and recent examinations of data from various radio telescopes further complicate the understanding of their origins.

This peculiar fluctuation appears in the afterglow of the Big Bang, representing radiation that has journeyed toward us since the dawn of time, referred to as the cosmic microwave background (CMB). Physicists generally expect this radiation to be uniform in all directions; therefore, significant deviations are perplexing. Current measurements indicate a gradient in CMB temperatures, resulting in colder and hotter areas known as a dipole, as explained by Lucas Behme. His team at Bielefeld University in Germany utilized data from radio telescopes to delve deeply into these anomalies.

Böhme notes that while the presence of the CMB dipole isn’t surprising, its magnitude defies the expectations of our prevailing cosmological models. Radiation emitted from moving sources—and perceived by observers who are also in motion—appears warmer or colder due to the Doppler effect and other relativistic effects. Yet, the dipole observed is approximately ten times more intense than anticipated.

To analyze this discrepancy, Böhme and his colleagues examined data from six radio telescopes and meticulously narrowed their focus to the three most precise measurements. Böhme describes their method as dividing the sky into pixels to determine the number of radiation sources within each. Nevertheless, despite their exhaustive adjustments, the dipole mystery endured.

Dragan Huterer from the University of Michigan finds the team’s thorough analysis noteworthy. He emphasizes that this is crucial for establishing the dipole as an undeniable feature of the CMB. “This is a significant insight, indicating that we fundamentally misunderstand our spatial context within the universe, or that our most accurate theories fail to align with the evidence,” he states. However, Huterer also points out the challenges inherent in accurately measuring radio astronomical data, which may result in systematic errors.

Part of the difficulty lies in the faintness of the radio signals collected, Böhme explains. “We aim to measure extremely subtle phenomena. Fine-tuning this measurement is challenging,” he notes. Yet, this is not the only evidence supporting the existence of the dipole. Infrared radiation from quasars tends to reinforce the findings from radio wave measurements, and forthcoming telescopes may enhance precision in observations, potentially resolving some of the dipole’s enigmas.

Reference: Physical Review Letter, available here

Topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Our Universe Might Be Enclosed Within a Black Hole

The Big Bang may have been an explosive rebound from a collapsing black hole.

According to a new study led by Enrique Gastagnaga at the University of Portsmouth, this paper posits that the Big Bang was actually a “big bounce,” triggered when matter fell into a massive, compressed black hole, leading to a rebound and subsequent expansion that formed the universe.

“In essence, our entire observable universe could exist within a black hole in a larger universe,” Gastagnaga stated. BBC Science Focus.

I was trapped in event horizon

A recently published study in Physical Review D re-evaluated the fate of a dense, large gas cloud collapsing under its own gravity.

Instead of leading to an infinitely dense point known as a singularity, this research suggests that the collapse halts at a certain point before bouncing back.

This rebound initiates a rapid expansion akin to what cosmologists theorize occurred post-Big Bang. In a way, our reality might be trapped at the event horizon of a black hole.

The “black hole universe model” offers insights into key issues concerning the current mainstream understanding of cosmology known as the standard model.

The standard model necessitates a period of inflation, suggesting the entire cosmos expanded rapidly just moments after the Big Bang. It also involves “dark energy,” the elusive material responsible for the universe’s expansion.

“However, we lack a true understanding of these components,” Gastagnaga noted. “Conversely, both phases of rapid expansion arise naturally in the black hole universe model, attributed to its bounce geometry and dynamics.

“One compelling aspect of this model is its simplicity. It relies solely on gravity and quantum mechanics to elucidate the expansion, inflation, and dark energy of the universe without requiring additional assumptions or unknown elements.”

The black hole universe model does face its own distinct challenges. For instance, dark matter remains poorly understood. We recognize the presence of this invisible material throughout the universe, holding galaxies together, yet astronomers struggle to identify its nature.

“Certain forms of dark matter could be linked to remnants from our universe’s collapse phase, but further exploration of this idea is necessary,” Gastagnaga revealed.

Our entire universe might be confined within the event horizon of a black hole – Credit: Getty Images

If the universe originated in a black hole, we could still exist within one. Some of the black holes we observe might represent mini cosmos, each with their own miniature black holes.

“This can be envisioned as a nested structure—one black hole within another, akin to Russian nesting dolls,” Gastagnaga explained.

However, not every one of the trillion black holes in our universe necessarily contains its own miniature cosmos, as the size of the black holes influences the time available for small structures to form.

“Large black holes (like ours) allow for the development of galaxies, stars, and planets, while smaller ones may evolve too rapidly for anything noteworthy to occur,” Gastagnaga stated.

“This is crucial because gravitational collapse predicts the existence of significantly smaller black holes than the large ones. The fact that we reside within one of the rare, very large cases might not simply be a coincidence.

The concept of a black hole universe emerged when Gastagnaga and his team adopted a new perspective on the origins of our universe.

“Rather than assuming the universe began with an inexplicable ‘bang’, we reversed our approach, starting with matter collapsing into a black hole,” he detailed.

It all revolves around the principle of quantum exclusion principle. In brief, this principle asserts that two identical particles cannot occupy the same space at once.

Thus, there exists a limit to how densely particles can be arranged before compaction becomes untenable according to the quantum exclusion principle.

This limitation is one reason why stars like white dwarfs do not simply collapse under their own weight.

“The exclusion principle is also applicable to some black holes,” Gastagnaga explained. “It halts material from collapsing into a singular point by slowing the process, stopping it at high density, causing a bounce, and entirely avoiding singularity.”

Relic black hole

The theory that the universe began with the Big Bang is sound in theory, but cosmologists cannot confirm its validity until it undergoes testing.

Fortunately, this theory generates specific predictions regarding the appearance of our universe, allowing astronomers to assess its validity.

“We predict that the universe is slightly curved; it behaves like a sphere but isn’t perfectly flat,” Gastagnaga explained.

The first direct visual evidence of a black hole (at the heart of the elliptical galaxy Messier 87 in the Virgo constellation) was captured by the Event Horizon Telescope in April 2017. -Photo Credit: EHT Collaboration

Most efforts to measure the universe’s curvature have indicated it is flat, but there may exist subtle bends that current methods are not sensitive enough to detect. Hence, the European Space Agency’s Euclidean spacecraft is engaged in the most precise measurements of cosmic curvature to date, with completion expected by 2030.

“It also predicts the presence of Relic black holes and Relic neutron stars—objects that survived the bounce and formed during the collapse stages, which may still exist today,” Gastagnaga added.

These relics could have shaped the evolution of galaxies and stars over time. There is potential to identify the signatures of these artifacts in our current observations of the universe, revealing whether they reside within black holes.

read more:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Strange Encounters: Exploring Chuck Tingle’s Erotic Universe with Sexy Dinosaurs, Fiery Tigers, and a Dashing Boat

In one of the regular segments of John Mulaney’s Netflix show, every week features live interactions with the comedian and his guests as they take calls on the week’s theme. This time, the topic is dinosaurs, and one caller—a surprisingly enthusiastic young boy and noted paleontologist—introduces himself as Chuck, among others. He discusses his book, Dinosaur erotica. “I think that’s my most recognized and award-winning book,” he elaborates. “It was nominated for the Hugo Prize.”

Actor Ayo Edebiri, one of Mulaney’s guests, inquires whether he won. “I didn’t win, but I went on to write a book called Pound after my Hugo Prize loss.”

Edebiri and fellow guest Conan O’Brien react with a mix of delight and confusion, but the call wraps up before Mulaney can delve into the comedic possibilities of their discussion.

Do you allow TikTok content?

This article includes content provided by TikTok. You may be using cookies or similar technologies, and permission may be required before loading. To view this content, Click “Get permission and continue.”.


Mulaney’s fans, often a quirky and socially active group, rushed to the comments, expressing that he missed a golden opportunity. The eccentricity isn’t just a relic of the internet’s past; it’s exemplified by the Elite class figure, Chuck Tingle. He initially went viral thanks to his uniquely self-published erotica, complete with endearingly bizarre Photoshop covers and titles that seem as if they were slapped together by an alluring Velociraptor. Tingle’s work even earned a Hugo Award nomination from the far-right Cultural War fringes.


He has consistently shared cover after cover on Twitter, producing increasingly elaborate titles that incorporate creatures of myth. From the absurd (Open wide for a handsome Sabertooth dentist who is also a ghost) to philosophical musings (I became gay by existential horror that I could actually be a character in a Chuck Tingle book), topical references (I have released this handsome cargo ship from the Suez Canal and now he is stuck on my ass), and recursive metatextual adventures (being slapped on the backside in his book “Spanked by My Own Ass”), Tingle’s work is truly multi-layered (with at least six such layered concepts).

If these titles sound outrageous, take a trip through your favorite ebook store to remind yourself that romance and erotica can be surprisingly utilitarian in their own right.

Check out my new novel POUNDED IN THE BUTT BY MY BOOK POUNDED IN THE BUTT BY MY BOOK POUNDED IN THE BUTT BY MY BOOK POUNDED IN THE BUTT BY MY BOOK POUNDED IN THE BUTT BY MY BOOK POUNDED IN THE BUTT BY MY OWN BUTT, available now https://t.co/pbpufzgbgo pic.twitter.com/jpbe1mnvad

— Chuck Tingle (@ChuckTingle) February 22, 2019


To date, Tingle has released “Tingle’s Gone Legate,” novellas, and three mainstream horror novels throughout the years.

He has also begun appearing in person at fan events and conventions. Similar to the enigmatic author Elena Ferrante, whose audience largely enjoys indie horror video games, Tingle maintains his anonymity. However, unlike Ferrante, he flamboyantly showcases himself with a pink pillowcase and a bag over his head, obscuring his features while exuberantly declaring his mantra, “love is real.” Sporting a colorful ensemble of a big blazer, sequined shorts, band tees, and sometimes light-up sneakers, he energetically dashes through theaters and bookstores.


Online, Tingle engages with his audience and celebrates his work with an innocent earnestness, using a unique mix of whimsical language that falls between highbrow and fandom lingo. He refers to readers, fans, and curious onlookers as “Bakaroo.” Life experiences, stories, beliefs, and careers are his “trot.” Tingle notes that his Orbit Bakarus never truly die but are merely visiting and riding a “lonely train” of existence. He expresses thoughts on the “existential dread of choking” and the notion that love is real—whether in eroticism or existentialism, his stories affirm this principle.

Finally released after being stuck in Amazon’s publishing platform for days—please enjoy! I FREED THIS HANDSOME CARGO SHIP FROM THE SUEZ CANAL AND NOW HE’S STUCK IN MY BUTT. https://t.co/yiD92W7oo3 pic.twitter.com/5MebQU2ACs

— Chuck Tingle (@ChuckTingle) March 27, 2021


Tingle has openly discussed his sexuality and sexual experiences in relation to neurodivergence. His storytelling often reflects his experiences being queer, depicting characters who navigate the challenges of revealing their true selves to family and friends in small-town America. His recent horror novels are set in a shared universe, intertwining narratives like Camp Damascus and Bury Your Gays, exploring themes of capitalism, chaos, and radical acceptance as monstrous forces. He emphasizes that authenticity in love and experience is paramount.

This approach is unabashedly direct. To borrow a line from The Great Garth Marengi, I know of writers who employ subtext—yet they all seem rather unwell.

The physical mask Tingle described serves to allow his true self to shine through, as it means less effort concealing his autism. He has maintained a colorful career persona, hinting at the possibility of a performance artist or character he has created since he was young. Rumors abound that he is, in fact, a well-known sturdy actor (and one of the most likable Hollywood Chrises) named Chris Pine.

However, most ardent Bakarus recognize that Chuck leads his own trot.


Source: www.theguardian.com

Discovered the Largest Black Hole in the Universe to Date

Astronomers have been monitoring the largest black holes observed in space thus far.

Through a combination of two distinct measurement techniques, researchers have recently identified that these colossal black holes possess nearly 10,000 times the mass of the ultra-massive black holes at the center of our galaxy.

This colossal black hole is situated five billion light-years from Earth, at the core of the Cosmic Horseshoe, one of the largest known galaxies. This massive galaxy seems to gather all the galaxies in its vicinity, meaning both it and its black hole have reached their ultimate sizes.

The black hole itself weighs an astonishing 36 billion times the mass of our sun.

The discovery is particularly remarkable given that these black holes are inactive, lacking the typical surrounding luminous dusty disc.

Instead, a recent study published in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society utilized a combination of two established methods to ascertain the size of this mega black hole.

“The ‘golden’ method generally depends on the kinematics of stars, meaning we measure how the stars move within the galaxy,” noted Carlos Mello in an interview with BBC Science Focus. He is a PhD student at a federal university in Brazil that led the research.

The speed of stars situated at the center of a galaxy correlates closely with the mass of its supermassive black hole. Scientists report that these stars are moving at astonishing velocities, around 400 kilometers (249 miles) per second, indicating an extraordinarily large black hole.

“However, this technique is most efficient for nearby galaxies where telescopes can better resolve the area surrounding the black hole,” Mello explained.

Given that the Cosmic Horseshoe is five billion light-years away, astronomers also employed a second method that utilizes the gravitational lensing effect of galaxies.

The Cosmic Horseshoe is known for the nearly perfect ring of light formed by a gravitational lens that bends light from a background galaxy – Credit: NASA/ESA

Gravitational lenses occur when light from a distant galaxy passes by a massive “lens” object, in this case, the black hole within the Cosmic Horseshoe. The gravity from this “lens” distorts the incoming light much like a magnifying glass, amplifying the light from the background galaxy while altering its appearance.

Astronomers can utilize this distortion to gauge the mass of the lensing object.

“The Cosmic Horseshoe is exceptional because it enables us to leverage both of these powerful methods simultaneously. This gives me greater confidence in the measurements of the black hole and its mass,” Mello remarked.

Both the galaxy and its black hole have achieved immense scales by merging with neighboring galaxies. This is the typical growth process for galaxies over time; ultimately, no surrounding galaxies can merge without reaching significant mass increases.

The Cosmic Horseshoe has reached this advanced stage, existing within a bubble of relatively few bright galaxies nearby.

“This discovery provides a unique insight into the culmination of galaxy and black hole formation,” Mello stated. “By examining this system, we can enhance our understanding of how other galaxies and their ultra-massive black holes evolve over cosmic time.”

About Our Experts

Carlos Mello is a doctoral student at a Federal University in Brazil.

Read more:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Quantum Physics Laws Might Erase the Universe That Preceded Ours

Did the cosmos originate from a massive bounce from a different universe?

Vadim Sadovski/Shutterstock

Is it possible that our universe will continuously expand, then contract back into a small point, repeating the Big Bang? According to recent mathematical analyses, the laws of physics suggest that such cyclical behavior is unlikely.

A pivotal element in the concept of a cyclical universe is the “big bounce,” which reimagines the beginning of our known universe as an event following this bounce rather than the traditional Big Bang. The Big Bang is characterized by incomprehensibly dense concentrations of matter and energy where gravity becomes intense enough to alter physical laws, leading to an infinite outward expansion. Conversely, a universe beginning with a big bounce allows us to explore realities beyond what we perceive as the inception, potentially emerging from another universe that undergoes contraction into an extremely dense state, but not necessarily a singularity.

Thus, the essential inquiry about whether time began with a singularity becomes crucial for understanding our universe’s past and future. If the big bounce indeed marks the inception of our universe, it may also inform its prospective trajectory. The initial idea proposed by Oxford’s Roger Penrose in 1965 revolved around the inevitability of collapse under general relativity, the prevailing framework for understanding gravity, particularly related to black holes, which also represent scenarios where gravity can disrupt the fabric of space-time. Penrose concluded that if gravity intensifies sufficiently, singularities cannot be evaded.

Currently, Raphael Bousso of the University of California, Berkeley, has introduced critical insights enhancing these findings by elucidating the quantum properties of the universe.

While Penrose’s arguments didn’t incorporate quantum theory, Bousso indicates that prior explorations by Aron Wall from Cambridge University considered scenarios of very minimal gravity. However, Bousso’s analysis does not limit gravity’s intensity and asserts that it “decisively excludes” the possibility of a circular universe, reinforcing the singularity associated with the Big Bang as an unavoidable outcome.

Onkar Parrikar from the Tata Basic Research Institute in India asserts, “This represents a significant generalization of Penrose’s original theorem, further extended by Wall.”

Chris Akers from the University of Colorado, Boulder points out that this marks substantial progress, as it is “far more effective in quantum physics” compared to earlier studies. He suggests that this new research will impose stricter constraints on larger bounce models.

Bousso’s computations hinge upon a generalized second law of thermodynamics, expanding the conventional second law to address entropy behavior around black holes. This advanced perspective has yet to be rigorously validated, according to Surjeet Rajendran at Johns Hopkins University in Maryland.

In 2018, Rajendran and his team crafted a mathematical representation of the bouncing universe that circumvented constraints imposed by Bousso’s theorems. However, their model included more dimensions of space-time than have currently been observed, leaving some uncertainties unaddressed.

Akers emphasizes, “Understanding our universe’s history is undeniably one of the most crucial scientific endeavors, and alternative models like big bounces should be thoroughly evaluated.”

Jackson Fris from the University of Cambridge mentions that in bouncing scenarios, quantum effects might bolster the universe’s rebound from its dense states. Investigating these scenarios can further our understanding of how quantum gravity theory, which melds general relativity and quantum mechanics, may reshape our conception of the universe. “If quantum gravity is indeed essential for a comprehensive explanation of a black hole’s interior or a big bang,” he notes.

According to Rajendran, one of the most vital methods to ascertain whether our universe experienced a spatial bounce is through gravitational wave observations. These space-time ripples could carry identifiable signatures of the bounce but currently exist in frequencies outside the detection capabilities of existing gravitational wave observatories. Future generations of detectors may capture these frequencies, although the realization of several planned upgrades to U.S. detectors may be uncertain due to proposed budget cuts from the previous administration.

“It is a matter of whether there exists a universe capable of generating a signal strong enough for detection, and if our current world permits scientists to perform those experimental constructions,” Rajendran states.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Newly Discovered Small Red Dot Galaxy Found in Our Local Universe

SEI 259288289

J1025+1402, one of three small red dot galaxies up to 2.5 billion light years apart

Digital Legacy Survey/d. Lang (Permieter Institute)

A new analysis shows that peculiar galaxies, once only identified in early cosmic formations, have surfaced more recently, raising intriguing questions about their origins.

Recent observations made by astronomers utilizing the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) have revealed compact red entities from the universe’s first billion years, dubbed Little Red Dots (LRD). These were initially believed to be associated with phenomena in the early universe, like the formation of supermassive black holes at the cores of galaxies, including our own.

Xiaojing Lin from China’s Tsinghua University, along with her research team, has discovered LRD in a much younger universe, about 12 billion years post-Big Bang. “This finding demonstrates that the conditions fostering small red dots are not solely confined to the early universe,” states Lin.

The researchers employed a telescope based in New Mexico to analyze images captured during the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. They pinpointed three objects that appeared as LRD, but significantly, they were merely 2.5 billion light years apart.

“They meet all criteria for classification as small red dots,” remarks Xiaohui Fan from the University of Arizona. “I believe there’s no doubt regarding their similarity.”

Each LRD is estimated to be approximately one million times the mass of the Sun, with dimensions comparable to the solar system. One of these LRDs is nicknamed the “egg” due to its elongated structure. The team also identified a few other potential LRD candidates awaiting confirmation.

These findings are exhilarating, says Anthony Taylor from the University of Texas at Austin, as they provide unique insights into the characteristics of LRDs. These objects are faint enough that telescopes like the JWST and Hubble can analyze them significantly easier than their early universe counterparts, potentially unveiling their true nature.

“They’re much closer to us, making them appear much brighter,” adds Taylor.

A schematic diagram showing what the local small red dots might be, depicting a black hole at the center, encircled by a significant gas envelope (yellow), streams of gas, clouds, and dust.

Xiaojing Lin with Cass Fan

A potential explanation for LRDs is that they signify the nascent phases of extraordinarily massive black holes maturing within the galaxy, possibly marking their initiation as they begin consuming matter voraciously.

It’s currently unclear whether local LRDs are dormant galaxies that have recently awakened or if they have just formed and are starting to consume significant amounts of material. “At this point, it is premature to discuss that aspect,” Taylor points out.

The team is eager to utilize Hubble and JWST to delve deeper into these local LRDs. “I have a proposal for Hubble pending approval,” Fan comments.

LRDs have the potential to exist not just in contemporary and ancient universes but throughout cosmic history. “They may have been lurking, camouflaged, amidst the cosmos,” Fan remarks. “People haven’t known what to look for.”

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Measuring the Vastness of the Universe: How Do We Do It?

NASA's James Webb Space Telescope's NIRCAM (near-infrared camera) instrument uncovers new details about the dense core of the Milky Way. This image focuses on the Sagittarius C (SGR C) region and highlights approximately 500,000 stars, along with some unidentified features. The large expanse of ionized hydrogen depicted in cyan contains an intriguing needle-like structure that lacks a consistent orientation. Credits to NASA, ESA, CSA, STSCI, and S. Crowe (University of Virginia).

Approximately 500,000 stars illuminate this section of the Milky Way galaxy

NASA, ESA, CSA, STScI, and S. Crowe (University of Virginia).

One significant challenge in discussing space and spacetime is the difficulty in grasping the vastness of the universe. It can be a struggle just to comprehend the scale of our solar system. For instance, if we model the Earth as being 1 centimeter in diameter, Pluto would need to be positioned 42 meters away! This distance is far greater than most homes can accommodate.

However, our solar system is quite small when compared to the scale of the Milky Way. Beyond the fact that our galaxy resides within an unseen halo of dark matter that extends far beyond what we can see, the Milky Way itself is immense; it would take about 100,000 years to traverse its entirety. In contrast, light travels from the Sun to Pluto in only 5.5 hours.

Notably, I’ve transitioned from daily distance measures to units related to the speed of light—they represent about 100,000 light-years, equivalent to 9.46 x 1020 meters. How can one visualize such vastness? It might be akin to comparing it to the scale of a ballroom. And the Milky Way is diminutive compared to the entire universe; it’s not even considered a particularly large galaxy, especially with our neighboring Andromeda being twice its width.

Moreover, spacetime is continuously expanding. This expansion doesn’t influence distance measurements within gravity-bound regions like our solar system or the Milky Way, nor does it impact the distances between galaxies. The Milky Way and Andromeda are actually moving towards one another, but the eventual collision will resemble a gentle dance rather than a catastrophic crash—at least 4.5 billion years are still required before this occurs!

However, on a grander scale, spacetime extends, causing clusters of galaxies to drift apart. This phenomenon is known as the Hubble expansion and implies that many measurements of spatial distance are subject to change. Billions of years down the line, future observers will have different calculations due to the expanding gap between us and the Virgo galaxy cluster.

Typically, these figures inspire awe, but they inevitably invite skepticism. A common question is how we ascertain these measurements. The answer lies in a “ladder” of measurements that astronomers use. Often, distances can be determined through objects with known brightness, such as certain types of stars.

Why don’t distant galaxies appear blurry, considering the expansion of space-time?

The simplest method employs Cepheid variable stars, which pulsate periodically, to calculate distances. These stars are effective over a specific range, after which another method is needed. Over the past three decades, astronomers have relied on specific types of supernovae, as they understand how their light behaves during the expansion of space-time. Other techniques also exist, like measuring the properties of bright red giant stars.

We possess a high level of confidence in our ability to measure long distances. However, we recognize why some readers raise questions about this process. One inquiry pertains to what happens to light as the universe expands. The standard view in cosmology is that, as space-time expands, light waves stretch, leading to a redshift much like how the frequency of a siren decreases. As previously noted, measuring this redshift is crucial for using supernovas to calculate distances.

Redshift indicates that light has lower energy than it did previously. However, there’s no apparent place for this “lost” energy to go, raising doubts. In Newtonian physics, energy must be accounted for, but this isn’t necessary in general relativity. In essence, the mechanisms that enable us to measure vast distances contradict our everyday understanding of how energy behaves in the universe.

Another related question from readers involves images of distant galaxies, like the first photo from the new Vera C. Rubin Observatory. Shouldn’t galaxies appear blurry due to the expansion of space-time?

It’s important to clarify that “observing” the expansion of space-time isn’t like watching an F1 race. It’s more akin to viewing an F1 race that unfolds over billions of years; the vast distances make the galaxies appear practically stationary. The only indicators we have of their separation are measurements like redshift, which simply track how light stretches over distances—not real-time observations of a galaxy’s motion.

I genuinely enjoy these types of questions as they delve into the nuances of how science communicators engage with their audiences. I appreciate that New Scientist readers challenge these metaphors to their limits!

Chanda’s Week

What I’m reading

A lot about the reasons behind its popularity—The Adventures of Alice in Wonderland.

What I’m seeing

I finally enjoyed viewing Station Eleven.

What I’m working on

I’ve been pondering a lot about the true nature of quantum fields. Curious!

Chanda Prescod-Weinstein is an associate professor of physics and astronomy as well as a core faculty member within women’s studies at the University of New Hampshire. Her latest book is titled “The Disturbed Cosmos: A Journey to Dark Matter, Space, and Dreams.”

Topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Scientists suggest that Earth may be trapped in a vast void in the universe.

Recent studies indicate that Earth and the rest of the Milky Way could be drifting through the universe’s voids for billions of years.

By analyzing the echoes left by the Big Bang’s “Soundwave,” a group of astronomers has uncovered that the universe’s voids may be more extensive than previously believed.

If validated, this theory could solve one of the major dilemmas in cosmology known as Hubble tension, which highlights the discrepancy in how quickly our universe is expanding based on various measurement methods.

Astronomers have grappled with this issue for quite some time, finding that the expansion rate measured from the distant universe is significantly slower than that determined from observations of local regions.

“The possible resolution to this discrepancy is that our galaxy resides near the center of a large, local void,” stated Dr. Indranil Banik from the University of Portsmouth at the National Astronomical Conference in Durham.

This situation arises because the area surrounding the void is densely packed with galaxies, and their gravitational influence gradually pulls in nearby galaxies, leading to the void’s slow emptying over time.

“Due to the void’s emptiness, the speed of objects receding from us is greater than if the void were absent,” Banik explained. Thus, it may appear that the local universe is expanding at a faster rate than it truly is.

For Hubble’s tension to hold, the empty void must exhibit a galactic density approximately 20% lower than the universe’s average and span about 1 billion light-years.

Life in the Void

The concept of living within a void is not new, but confirming its existence poses challenges.

For instance, it’s quite difficult to perceive the shape of your environment when you are immersed within it—like trying to analyze your home from inside a room.

Current cosmological theories suggest uniformity across large scales, implying the absence of significant voids within our vicinity.

Galaxies tend to cluster together like the Perseus clusters, separated by large voids. Yet, everything should appear uniform on a grand scale – credits: Image processing Cuillandre (Cea Paris-Saclay), G. by ESA/Euclid/Euclid Consortium/NASA, J.-C. Anselmi

However, Banik’s team has gathered evidence supporting the existence of a local void by studying the acoustic vibrations known as baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO). These fluctuations result from pressure waves produced during the primordial phase of the Big Bang.

Over billions of years, these oscillations have influenced the arrangement of galaxies in the broader universe. If our galaxy is positioned at the center of a void, it would distort the BAO patterns we observe nearby.

This research, drawing on data collected over the past 20 years, reinforces the idea that we genuinely inhabit a vast void.

Real challenges will emerge when examining how life within the void impacts other aspects of the surrounding universe, which may prove to be lonelier than we ever anticipated.

read more

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

ALMA Illuminates the Galaxies of the Early Universe

As part of the Cristal (CII solved ISM with Star Forming Galaxies using Alma) Investigation, astronomers examined the universe when it was merely a billion years old.



This artist’s impression illustrates masses of star-forming galaxies in the early universe, featuring dark dust marked in red and carbon gases depicted in black. These details have been extensively documented across multiple galaxies in Alma’s Cristal Survey. Image credits: NSF/AUI/NRAO/B. SAXTON.

“Alma’s remarkable capability to penetrate dust and gas enabled us to observe these distant galaxies with astonishing detail,” stated Dr. Rodrigo Ignacio Herrera Camus.

“We’re not merely examining the light emissions. We’re investigating the internal structures of these galaxies and uncovering the processes that transpire within them.”

In the Cristal Survey, astronomers concentrated on a sample of star-forming galaxies exhibiting a conventional relationship between galaxy mass and star formation rate.

Alma’s observations indicated that some galaxies displayed signs of organized rotation, hinting at the formation of early discs, while others exhibited chaotic movements and distorted shapes, indicative of collisions and mergers.

Alma also identified clouds of gas revealed through specific light emissions from ionized carbon, extending far beyond the stellar formation regions. This suggests that the galaxies are enveloped by expansive gas reservoirs, possibly fueling future star formation or being ejected by powerful outflows.

Numerous galaxies displayed star formation occurring in distinct clumps, providing deeper insights into the birth of stars within these early systems.



A portrait of an early galactic layer family, as detailed in a study of the Cristal program. Image credit: Cristal large program.

One particularly intriguing discovery was the identification of an early galaxy known as Cristal-10.

This galaxy shows a significant deficiency in ionized carbon emissions in comparison to its distant light, similar to the characteristics observed in ARP 220, one of the brightest and most concealed galaxies in the local universe.

Subsequent investigations into this galaxy may illuminate the nature and physical state of early interstellar media in the universe.

“Cristal offers detailed data that was unattainable before Alma,” Dr. Herrera Camus remarked.

“I’ve gained a new family portrait of early galactic evolution.”

“These findings challenge existing galaxy formation models and open up new research avenues.”

“The Cristal investigation highlights Alma’s power in studying galaxy evolution during the early universe.”

“By tracing the cold gases and dust that fuel star formation, Alma assists scientists in constructing narratives of how our own Milky Way galaxy developed.”

Source: www.sci.news

Astronomers Use Cosmological Radio Signals to Identify First-Generation Stars in the Universe

The primordial stars, known as group III, likely formed from the abundant gases present in the young universe. These stars were responsible for generating the first heavier elements, illuminating the universe, bringing an end to the cosmic dark ages, and ushering in the era of reionization. Due to the challenges of direct observation, the characteristics of these early stars are still largely unknown. Professor Anastasia Fialkov from Cambridge University and her team suggest that astronomers can infer the masses of these stars by analyzing the cosmological 21 cm signal produced by hydrogen atoms located between the regions where the stars formed.

Artist’s impression of a field of Population III stars that would have existed hundreds of millions of years post-Big Bang. Image credits: noirlab/nsf/aura/J. da silva/SpaceEngine.

“This presents a unique opportunity to understand how the universe’s first light emerged from darkness,” stated Professor Fialkov.

“We are beginning to unravel the narrative of the transition from a cold, dark cosmos to one filled with stars.”

Studies focused on the universe’s ancient stars rely on the faint 21 cm signal, an energy signature emanating from over 13 billion years ago.

This signal, influenced by the radiation from nascent stars and black holes, offers a rare glimpse into the universe’s formative years.

Professor Fialkov leads the Leach theory group dedicated to radio experiments analyzing space hydrogen.

“Leach is a radio antenna and one of two key projects designed to enhance our understanding of the dawn and reionization phases of the universe, when the first stars reactivated neutral hydrogen atoms,” explained the astronomer.

“While our abilities to capture radio signals are presently undergoing calibration, we remain dedicated to unveiling insights about the early universe.

“Conversely, the Square Kilometer Arrays (SKAs) chart variations in cosmic signals across extensive areas of the sky.”

“Both initiatives are crucial for probing the masses, brightness, and distribution of the universe’s earliest stars.”

In their current research, Professor Fialkov and co-authors formulated a model to predict the 21 cm signal for both REACH and SKA, discovering that the signal is sensitive to the mass of the first stars.

“We are the first group to accurately model how the 21 cm signal correlates with the mass of the first stars, factoring in ultraviolet starlight and x-ray emissions resulting from the demise of the first stars,” stated Professor Fialkov.

“Our findings stem from simulations integrating the primordial conditions of the universe, such as the hydrogen and helium composition formed during the Big Bang.”

In developing their theoretical framework, researchers examined how the 21 cm signal responds to the mass distribution of Population III stars.

They discovered that earlier studies underestimated this relationship as they failed to account for both the quantity and luminosity of x-ray binaries among Population III stars and their impact on the 21 cm signal.

While REACH and SKA cannot photograph individual stars, they do provide comprehensive data on stars, x-ray binary systems, and entire galactic populations.

“Connecting radio data to the narrative of the first stars requires some imagination, but its implications are profound,” remarked Professor Fialkov.

“The predictions we present hold significant value in enhancing our understanding of the universe’s earliest stars,” noted Dr. Eloi de Lera Acedo from Cambridge University.

“We offer insights into the masses of these early stars, suggesting that the light they emitted may have been drastically different from today’s stars.”

“Next-generation telescopes like REACH are set to unlock the secrets of the early universe. These predictions are vital for interpreting radio observations being conducted from Karu, South Africa.”

The research paper was published online today in the journal Nature Astronomy.

____

T. Gessey-Jones et al. Determination of the mass distribution of the first stars from a 21 cm signal. Nature Astronomy Published online on June 20th, 2025. doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02575-x

Source: www.sci.news

Astronomers Map the Distribution of Ordinary Matter Across the Universe

Astronomers are making significant strides in comprehending how matter behaves and interacts in space utilizing fast radio bursts (FRB). They have found that over three-quarters of the universe’s ordinary material is concealed within sparse intergalactic gases, and they have also identified the furthest FRB event recorded to date.

This artist’s concept illustrates the density regions and red blank areas of the universe’s web in blue. Image Credit: Jack Madden/Illustristng/Ralf Konietzka/Liam Connor, CFA.

For many years, it has been established that at least half of the normal, predominantly proton-based baryonic material in the universe has gone unaccounted for.

Previous approaches by astronomers employed methods like X-ray and ultraviolet observations to gather significant clues regarding this missing mass, which manifests as extremely thin warm gases between galaxies.

The challenge arises from the high-temperature, low-density gas that remains mostly invisible to most telescopes, leaving scientists unable to assess its presence or distribution.

This is where FRBs come into play – brief, intense radio signals emitted by distant galaxies that researchers have recently demonstrated could measure baryonic matter in space, although its location remained a mystery until now.

In the latest study, scientists examined 60 FRBs, with the most distant FRB recorded at 1,174 million light-years (FRB 20200120E) from Messier 81 and reaching up to 9.1 billion light-years (FRB 20230521b).

This enabled them to pinpoint the missing material within intergalactic spaces or the intergalactic medium (IGM).

“The ‘baryon problem’ was never in doubt,” stated Dr. Liam Connor, an astronomer at the Harvard & Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. “The issue has always been about its location. Now with FRBs, we’ve established that three-quarters of it exists between galaxies in the cosmic web.”

By analyzing the delays in each FRB signal as it traveled through space, Dr. Connor and his colleagues tracked the gaseous medium along its path.

“FRBs function like flashlights in space, illuminating the intergalactic medium. By accurately gauging how the light slows down, we can assess this medium, whether it’s starkly visible or barely detectable,” Dr. Connor explains.

The findings are revealing—approximately 76% of the universe’s baryonic matter resides within the IGM.

Additionally, about 15% is found in galaxy halos, with a minor fraction embedded within stars and cool galactic gases.

This distribution aligns with predictions made by advanced cosmological simulations, yet this is the first instance of direct confirmation.

“This marks a triumph for contemporary astronomy,” noted Dr. Vikram Ravi, an astronomer from California.

“Thanks to FRBs, we are now approaching a new understanding of the universe’s structure and composition.”

“These brief flashes enable us to trace the invisible baryonic matter filling the expansive voids between galaxies,” he added.

“Baryons are pulled into galaxies by gravity; however, supermassive black holes and supernova explosions can expel them back into the IGM, cooling cosmic temperatures when they spiral out of control,” commented Dr. Connor.

“Our findings indicate that this feedback mechanism is effective, suggesting gas must be displaced from galaxies into the IGM.”

The team’s results are published today in the journal Nature Astronomy.

____

L. Connor et al. Gas-rich cosmic web unveiled by the partition of missing baryons. Nature Astronomy Published online on June 16th, 2025. doi:10.1038/s41550-025-02566-y

Source: www.sci.news

Scientists Reveal That Objects in Our Universe Dissipate Faster Than Previously Believed

A 2023 study by Professor Haino Falk and his team at Ladbou University revealed that not just black holes, but all cosmic entities can “evaporate” through a mechanism akin to Hawking radiation. Following the publication, the researchers were inundated with inquiries regarding the duration of this process. Their latest findings estimate that the universe’s conclusion is approximately 1078 years away. If only radiation, similar to Hawking radiation, is taken into account, the timeline shortens to just a few years. This represents the time required for a white dwarf—the most stable astronomical object—to collapse through a Hawking-like radiation process. Previous research, which overlooked this effect, had estimated the lifespan of white dwarfs to be around 101100 years.

An artistic depiction of neutron stars undergoing gradual ‘evaporation’ through Hawking-like radiation. Image credits: Daniëlle Futselaar/Artsource.nl.

“Thus, the ultimate conclusion of the universe will arrive significantly sooner than anticipated; however, rest assured, it will still take an incredibly long time,” noted Professor Falk.

In 1975, physicist Stephen Hawking proposed that particles and radiation could escape black holes, challenging the conventional framework of relativity.

Near the edge of a black hole, two transient particles emerge; one gets drawn into the black hole while the other successfully escapes.

A notable outcome of Hawking radiation is the gradual disintegration of black holes into particles and radiation.

This finding stands in opposition to Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity.

Professor Falk and his co-authors determined that the process of Hawking radiation applies to various objects with theoretically significant gravitational fields.

Their further calculations indicated that the “evaporation time” for an object is contingent entirely upon its density.

Surprisingly, neutron stars and stellar black holes have an identical decay time of 1067 years.

This result was unexpected, given that black holes possess a more intense gravitational field.

“However, black holes lack a surface,” remarked Dr. Michael Wandrack, a postdoctoral researcher at Radboud University.

“They reabsorb parts of their own radiation, which inhibits the process.”

“We also explored how long it would take for humans and the moon to evaporate via Hawking-like radiation: about 1090 years,” the researcher added.

“Naturally, other mechanisms could lead to faster disappearance for humans and the moon.”

“This research exemplifies an exciting interdisciplinary collaboration, merging astrophysics, quantum physics, and mathematics to yield new insights,” stated Professor Walter Van Suisilecom from Radboud University.

“By pursuing these inquiries and examining extreme scenarios, we aim to enhance our understanding of the theory. Hopefully, one day, we will unravel the enigma surrounding Hawking radiation.”

The new paper is set to be published in Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics.

____

Haino Falke et al. 2025. The lifetime limit of the star remnants from gravity pair generation. jcap in press; Arxiv: 2410.14734

Source: www.sci.news

Research suggests that universe may rotate every 500 billion years

New research led by astronomers at the University of Hawaii suggests that our universe could spin.

In the formation of the universe, gravity links galaxies with clusters of galaxies to construct vast co-nes-like structures that link hundreds of millions of light years along an invisible bridge. This is known as Cosmic Web. Image credit: Springel et al. / Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics.

“To paraphrase the Greek philosopher Heracritus of Ephesus, he famously said Pantarei – he thought everything would change, perhaps Panta Kaicurtai – he thought everything would change.”

According to current models, the universe expands evenly in all directions with no signs of rotation. This idea fits most of what astronomers observe.

But that doesn’t explain the so-called Hubble tension. It is a long-standing discrepancy between two ways of measuring how quickly the universe is expanding.

One method examines distant exploding stars or supernovas to measure distances to galaxies, providing the magnification of the universe over the past billions of years.

Another method uses artefact radiation from the Big Bang, providing a very early universe expansion rate, about 13 billion years ago. Each gives a different value for the expansion rate.

Dr. Szapudi and his colleagues developed a mathematical model of the universe.

First, the model followed standard rules. They then added a small amount of rotation. Those small changes made a huge difference.

“To my surprise, we found that our model solves paradoxes without conflicting with current astronomical measurements,” Dr. Szapudi said.

“What’s even better is that it’s compatible with other models that assume rotation.”

“So perhaps everything really changes.

The team’s models suggest that the universe could turn once every 500 billion years.

“This idea does not break known laws of physics,” the astronomer said.

“And maybe it explains why measurements of space growth are completely disagreeable.”

“The next step is to turn the theory into a complete computer model and find ways to find signs of this slow, universe spin.”

Survey results It will be displayed in Monthly Notices from the Royal Astronomical Society.

____

Balázs Endre Szigeti et al. 2025. Can rotation solve the Hubble puzzle? mnras 538(4): 3038-3041; doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf446

Source: www.sci.news

Creation of Violent and Beautiful Phenomena in the Universe: The Story of Space Jet

Two recent epic astronomical discoveries may seem unrelated at first glance.

One is an image captured by the James Webb Space Telescope showing newborn stars in our galaxy, approximately 450 light years away. This incredible picture depicts the birth of the solar system with thin dust discs slowly forming.

The other discovery combines optical and wireless data to reveal a massive astrophysical system larger than the Milky Way. This discovery provides a glimpse into the intergalactic violence caused by supermassive black holes actively consuming their surroundings.

Despite their differences, a striking similarity can be observed between the two discoveries. Both display objects emitting long, straight jets of light or material into the universe, resembling double-sided lightsabers.

Discovered by JWST, the HH 30 is a primitive disk illuminated with a newborn star in the center, expelling a jet of gas and dust. Approximately 450 light years away from the Taurus Molecular Cloud – Photo Credits: ESA/Webb, NASA & CSA, Tazaki et al

Astrophysical jets are a common phenomenon in space, driven by the basic features of gravity, rotation, and magnetic fields.

The formation of discs in space involves a few simple steps driven by gravity and rotation. Material is attracted towards an object creating discs like spiral galaxies, protoplanetary discs, and accretion discs around black holes.

Gravity and rotation explain the formation of these discs, while magnetic fields play a crucial role in the generation of jets. Charged particles in space generate magnetic fields when in motion, leading to the creation of long, straight jets perpendicular to the disc plane.

Using wireless and optical data, astronomers discovered this huge astrophysical jet. This extends farther than the Milky Way – lofar/decals/desi regacy imaging surveys/lbnl/doe/ctio/noirlab/nsf/auraImage Processing: m zamani (nsf noirlab).

These jets vary in strength and size depending on the magnetic field and rotation that drives them. From protostars to supermassive black holes, jets can extend vast distances into space, showcasing the extreme power of gravity and magnetic forces in the universe.

Astrophysical jets provide a mesmerizing insight into the mechanisms driving the most extreme wonders of the universe, from stars being devoured by black holes to pulsars emitting light across space.

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Webb discovers Lyman-Alpha emissions from ancient galaxy in early universe

The light of Lyman Afa from Jades-GS-Z13-1 took us nearly 13.47 billion to contact us, as it dates back just 330 million years from the Big Bang.

This image shows the Jades-GS-Z13-1 (middle red dot) imaged with Webb’s near-infrared camera (Nircam) as part of the Jades program. Image credits: NASA/ESA/CSA/WEBB/STSCI/JADES COLLABORATION/BRANT ROBERTSON, UC SANTA CRUZ/BEN JOHNSON, CFA/Sandro Tacchella, Cambridge/Phill Cargile, CFA/J. Witstok, P. Jakobsen & A. Pagan, Stsci/M. Zamani, Esa & Webb.

NASA/ESA/CSA James Webb Space Telescope’s key scientific goal was to see more than ever before the distant past of our universe, when the first galaxy formed after the Big Bang.

This search has already led to record-breaking galaxies when observing programs such as the JWST Advanced Deep Deep Alactic Survey (Jades).

Webb’s extraordinary sensitivity to infrared also opens up a whole new path for research into when and how such galaxies were formed, and their impact on the universe of the time known as Cosmic Dawn.

Astronomers studying one of these very early galaxies have been discovered in a spectrum of light that challenges our established understanding of the early history of the universe.

The Jades-GS-Z13-1 (GS-Z13-1 for short) was discovered in images taken by Webb’s Nircam (near-infrared camera) as part of the Jades program.

Dr. Roberto Maiolino and colleagues at the University of Cambridge and London used galaxy brightness with various infrared filters to estimate the redshift that measures the distance of a galaxy from Earth, based on how light stretches along the path of a space.

NIRCAM imaging resulted in an initial redshift estimate of 12.9. In an attempt to confirm that extreme redshift, astronomers observed the galaxy using Webb’s near-infrared spectrometer (NIRSPEC) instrument.

The resulting spectrum confirmed that the redshift was 13.0. This is the equivalent of a galaxy seen just 330 million years after the Big Bang, the current 13.8 billion-year-old minority in the universe.

However, unexpected features also stood out. One is the wavelength of light of a particular distinct bright wavelength, identified as Lyman alpha radiation emitted by hydrogen atoms.

This emission was far stronger than astronomers who thought they could be possible at this early stage of space development.

“The early universe was soaked in a thick mist of neutral hydrogen,” Dr. Maiolino said.

“Most of this haze was lifted in a process called reionization, which was completed about a billion years after the Big Bang.”

“The GS-Z13-1 shows the incredibly clear and Telltail signature of the Lyman Alpha radiation, which can only be seen after the surrounding mist has been fully lifted,” he said.

“This result was completely unexpected by early galaxy formation theories, which surprised astronomers.”

“Before and during the reionization, the enormous amount of neutral hydrogen mist surrounding the galaxy blocked the ultraviolet rays of released energy, like the filtration effect of colored glass.”

“Until sufficient stars were formed and the hydrogen gas could ionize, such light, including Lyman Alpha radiation, could not escape these fledgling galaxies and reach Earth.”

“According to Lyman Alpha radiation from this galaxy has therefore had great significance in our early understanding of the universe.”

“We’ve seen a lot of people who have had a lot of trouble with the world,” said Dr. Kevin Hayneline, an astronomer at the University of Arizona.

“We could have thought that early universes were covered in dense mists that would be very difficult to find even a powerful lighthouse peering through, but here, beams of light from this galaxy penetrate the veil.”

“This fascinating emission line has a major impact on how and when the universe has been reionized.”

The source of GS-Z13-1’s Lyman Alpha radiation from this galaxy is yet to be known, but it may contain the first light from the earliest generation of stars formed in the universe.

“The large bubbles of ionized hydrogen surrounding this galaxy may have been created by the star’s unique population, much larger, hotter and brighter than the stars formed at the later epoch, and perhaps representative of the first generation of stars, said Dr. Joris Wittok, an astronomer at Cambridge and Appenhagen University.

“The powerful active galactic nucleus (AGN) driven by one of the first super-large black holes is another possibility identified by our team.”

Team’s Survey results Published in the March 26th issue of the journal Nature.

____

J. Wittstock et al. 2025. We witness the onset of reionization with Lyman-α ejection in the redshift13. Nature 639, 897-901; doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08779-5

Source: www.sci.news

Anomalies in the Universe: Massive spiral galaxies expel enormous pairs of relativistic jets

2MASX J23453268-0449256 (J2345-0449 for short), a very huge, rapidly spinning, jet lag spiral galaxy with approximately 947 million light years in the Aquarius constellation, a mass of billions of people billions that are billions of times the sun’s, and mounted on a massive radio jet spanning six million light years. This is one of the largest known in any spiral galaxy, and such powerful jets are almost exclusively found in elliptical galaxies rather than spiral, thus covering the conventional wisdom of galaxies’ evolution. It also means that the Milky Way can potentially create similar energetic jets in the future.



This image shows the Spiral Galaxy 2Masx J23453268-0449256 and its huge radio jet. Image credit: Bagchi et al. /Giant Metrure Lave Radio Telescope.

“This discovery is more than just weird. It forces us to rethink the evolution of galaxies and how super-large black holes grow and shape the environment within them,” said Professor Joydeep Baguch of Christ University.

“If spiral galaxies can not only survive, but also thrive under such extreme conditions, what does this mean for the future of our own Milky Way galaxies?”

“Can our Galaxy experience similar high-energy phenomena that have serious consequences for the survival of precious lives within it?”

In a new study, astronomers have unraveled the structure and evolution of the Spiral Galaxy J2345-0449, three times the size of the Milky Way.

Using observations from NASA/ESA Hubble Space Telescope, Giant Metruh Rave Radio Telescope, Atacama’s Large Millimeter/Sub-Millimeter Array (ALMA), and multi-wavelength analysis, we detected the giant ultrafine black holes of its mind and radio jets in the largest radio jets by creating rare galaxies.

Traditionally, scientists believed that such huge, superimpression violent activities would destroy the delicate structures of spiral galaxies.

But for all possibilities, J2345-0449 retains its quiet nature with a well-defined spiral arm, bright nuclear bars and an uninterrupted ring of stars.

In addition to enigma, the galaxy is surrounded by vast halos of hot x-ray exhaust, providing important insights into its history.

This halo cools slowly over time, but the black hole jets act like space furnaces, preventing new star formation despite the abundant star-building materials present.

The authors also found that J2345-0449 contains 10 times the dark matter as the Milky Way.

“Understanding these rare galaxies could provide important clues about the invisible forces that govern the universe, such as the nature of dark matter, the long-term fate of the galaxy, and the origin of life,” says Ph.D. A student at the University of Christ.

“In the end, this research brings us one step closer to solving the mystery of the Cosmos and reminds us that the universe holds surprise beyond our imagination.”

Survey results It was published in Monthly Notices from the Royal Astronomical Society.

____

Joydeep Bagchi et al. 2025. Announcing bulge disk structures, AGN feedback and baryon landscapes in a large helical galaxy with MPC-scale radio jets. mnras 538(3): 1628-1652; doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf229

Source: www.sci.news

Unveiling the mysteries of the dark universe with a breathtaking new space map

The Euclidean Mission of the European Space Agency (ESA) has just released its first significant batch of research data, offering a fascinating glimpse into the vast cosmos.

This newly revealed image, covering a 63-square patch of the sky (over 300 times the size of a full moon), showcases millions of galaxies in intricate detail.

But this is just the beginning. The Euclidean mission, aimed at mapping the universe and unraveling the mysteries of dark matter and dark energy, which constitute 95% of the universe, has only just begun.

Launched in February 2024 and released in July 2023, Euclid is designed to survey a third of the sky, eventually capturing images of 1.5 billion galaxies. In just a week of observations, the mission has already spotted 26 million galaxies, some located an astounding 10.5 billion light years away.

Professor Carole Mandel, ESA’s director of science, described the release as “a treasure trove of information for scientists to delve into.” In an official statement, she highlighted Euclid’s role as the “ultimate discovery machine,” enabling astronomers to explore the grand structure of the universe with unparalleled precision.

The initial observations of the mission showcase Euclid’s capability to map the large-scale structures of the universe using high-resolution visible instruments (VIS) and near-infrared spectrometers (NISPs), capturing galaxies across vast distances and helping scientists track the intricate web-like structure of space.

This image shows not only light, gravity lenses within the cluster, but also a variety of huge galaxy clusters. The cluster near the center is called J041110.98-481939.3 and is almost 6 billion light years away. -ESA/EUCLID/EUCLID Image processing by CONSORTIUM/NASA, J.-C, Cuillandre, E. Bertin, G. Anselmi

“Euclid’s potential to unveil more about dark matter and dark energy from the massive structure of the Cosmic Web can only be realized once the entire survey is completed,” stated Dr. Clotilde Laigle, a scientist from the Euclidean Consortium.

“Nevertheless, this first data release offers a unique view into the vast organization of galaxies, providing insights into the formation of galaxies over time.”

With an immense data stream – sending back 100 GB of data to Earth per day – scientists are challenged with cataloging and analyzing an unprecedented number of galaxies. To tackle this, AI algorithms, in collaboration with thousands of citizen scientists, have categorized over 380,000 galaxies in their initial dataset.

The AI model known as “Zoobot” was trained over a month on the Galaxy Zoo platform with the help of nearly 10,000 volunteers to enhance their galaxy classification skills.

Dr. Mike Walmsley, an expert in astronomical deep learning at the University of Toronto, highlighted the significance of AI in processing Euclid’s vast datasets.

While scientists are still grappling with this first data release, many are already envisioning the future.

“Euclid will truly revolutionize our understanding of the universe,” stated Professor Christopher Conselice from the University of Manchester. He depicted the results as just “the tip of the iceberg,” foreseeing Euclid’s revelations about dark energy and a complete picture of galactic evolution throughout the ages.

The mission is still in its nascent stages, with the released data accounting for only 0.4% of Euclid’s final investigation scope. Setting the stage for even more profound discoveries, the initial data release indicates that Euclid is poised to offer a remarkable new perspective on the universe. In October 2026, ESA is expected to release Euclid’s first major cosmological dataset, covering larger research areas and multiple deep field paths.

If this initial glimpse is any indication, the coming years promise a deluge of data and discoveries that could redefine our understanding of the universe.

read more:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Could our universe be a membrane on the fringe of an unfamiliar reality far away?

Getty Images/Shutterstock

String theory is the best candidate we have for all theories. Bends to that rule, various entangled theories of traditional physics emerge as part of a sublime, higher-dimensional tapestry. It can unify all four of nature, including the most troublesome gravity of all. If you're lucky, you might even tame big bangs and black holes without losing threads.

There's only one catch. String theory cannot explain the universe like ours. That mathematics can explain billions of different possible universes, but not expanding at speeds of acceleration, it's exactly what we see. Certainly, no one knows that this acceleration is driving. Mystical “dark energy” is the usual placeholder. According to theory, it probably shouldn't happen at all.

For 25 years, this was a big problem, but now I may have found a way past it. On the surface, the answer does not shock anyone who is used to the luxury of modern physics. We need to rethink the universe as part of a much larger company. Doing this can bloat into the content of your mind. In fact, the acceleration of expansion seems to come naturally. However, this new scheme could be the wildest scheme ever. Our familiar spaces are delicately settled between high-dimensional hyperspace and total meaninglessness. “Our proposal says that our existence is like a shadow: a projection onto a wall at the end of the world.” Antonio Padillaa physicist at the University of Nottingham in the UK.

For all the grandeur of the present, the string…

Source: www.newscientist.com

The double-edged sword of the best map of the early universe ever for cosmologists

New image of cosmic microwave background radiation in part of the sky – the zoomed area is about 20 times the width of the moon seen from Earth

ACT collaboration. ESA/Planck Collaboration

The latest and greatest maps of the early universe, five times more detailed than anything before, are accurately supported by the main models of the universe, but are also a double-edged sword, as new data does not provide clues to solve some of the greatest mysteries of cosmology.

The map shows the universe’s cosmic microwave background (CMB). This is a faint remaining radiation from the early stages of the universe. It began as the earliest light just 380,000 years after the Big Bang, but the expansion of the universe over billions of years has shifted frequency from the visible spectrum to microwaves.

Now, new data from Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) gave us a clearer image of the CMB only from half of the sky that can be imaged from the Chilean observatory location.

Joe Dunkley At Princeton University, which worked on the project, the data says it has more vigorously and accurately reduced the composition of the universe, its size, age, and magnification rate. But the truly important discovery was that nothing contradicts the current major model of the universe. Lambda-CDM.

Previous data set the universe’s age at 13.8 billion years old, and the velocity at which it is expanding – known as the Hubble constant – is 67-68 km per 67-68 km per megapulsek distance from Earth. The ACT data essentially confirms this, but increases accuracy and confidence in those findings.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ggtt9qhn7os

CMB is first mapped by NASA’s Space Background Explorer (COBE) in the 1980s and 90s, then by NASA’s Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropic Probe (WMAP) in the 2000s, and then from the European Space Agency’s Planck Spacecraft to provide early knowledge from 2009 to 2013. universe.

One of the restrictions on the act is that unlike these previous space-based missions, it is a ground-based telescope. Therefore, it is limited to half of the sky. Nevertheless, the action not only provides better resolution and sensitivity than these previous maps, but also measures the direction in which the polarization or light waves of CMB are oscillated, revealing some information about how CMB light evolved over time.

“With a closer look at the polarization of the CMB, we could have seen something different. We could have seen the destruction of standard space models,” says Dunkley. “Every time you look at the universe differently, you can’t be sure the original model is still working. You were ready to see something coming out of that model.

This may be a relief for anyone working on Lambda-CDM, but it was not welcome news for all scientists. Colinhill At Columbia University in New York, he says he wanted to see some evidence in data on a phenomenon that has not yet been recognized (probably a new type of energy or particle). This helps explain the so-called Hubble tension.

“We’ve all been blown away by how consistent we are. [the ACT data] It’s really on the standard model. We all produce models from different aspects, looking for places where they break and where nature can give us something to sink our teeth. And so far, nature hasn’t created that crack,” says Hill.

He says that the most viable theory for the contradiction of Hubble tension requires phenomena that simply do not appear in the ACT data we currently have. This brings the scientist back to seek another explanation. “The new measurements will make theorists, including me, even closer restraint jackets,” says Hill. “That deepens the mystery.”

ACT collected data that constituted this new map between 2017 and 2022, but is now shut down. Dunkley says that while a new Chilean telescope will start work later this year, we are unlikely to get a higher resolution map for a few years. As for the other half of the sky, only two locations on Earth could potentially host a new telescope with results: Greenland and Tibet. Dunkley says that unfortunately Greenland still doesn’t have the infrastructure needed for such a project, and Tibet is politically sensitive.

Jens Chluba At the University of Manchester in the UK, scientists on the project are already working with data, but say the open release of ACT maps will cause a surge in activity.

The Mystery of the Universe: Cheshire, England

Spend a weekend with some of the brightest minds of science. Explore the mysteries of the universe in an exciting program that includes an excursion to see the iconic Lovell telescope.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Water was present in the early universe 100-200 million years following the Big Bang

It is explained in the paper published today journal Natural Astronomy the discovery means that habitable deplanets may have begun to form much earlier, before they were formed billions of years ago.

This artist's impression shows the evolution of the universe, beginning with the Big Bang on the left. After that, you will see the microwave background of the universe. The formation of the first stars ends the dark ages of the universe, followed by the formation of galaxies. Image credit: M. Weiss/Harvard – Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.

“We had no oxygen before the first star exploded, so there was no water in space,” said Daniel Warren, an astronomer at the University of Portsmouth.

“Only a very simple nucleus survived the Big Bang: hydrogen, helium, lithium, trace amounts of barium and boron.”

According to Dr. Whalen and his colleagues, water molecules began to form shortly after the first supernova explosion known as the Population III Supernova.

These cosmic events that occurred on first generation stars were essential to creating the heavy elements (such as oxygen) needed for water to exist.

“The oxygen forged in the hearts of these supernovas combines with hydrogen to form water, paving the way for the creation of the essential elements needed for life,” Dr. Whalen said.

In their study, researchers looked at two types of supernovae. This produces corecrolaps supernovae, which produces a modest amount of heavy elements, and more energetic POP III supernovae.

They discovered that both types of supernovae form dense masses of rich gas in water.

The overall amount of water produced by these early supernovae was modest, but was highly concentrated in a gas-dense area called the cloud core, which is thought to be the birthplace of stars and planets.

These early, water-rich regions may have sown planetary formations at the dawn of space long before the first galaxy took shape.

“A significant discovery is that the primitive supernova formed water in the universe ahead of the first galaxy,” Dr. Hualen said.

“So water was already an important component of the first galaxy.”

“This means that the conditions necessary for the formation of life were in place faster than we could have imagined, meaning it was an important step in our early understanding of the universe.”

“The total water mass was modest, but it was very concentrated on the only structures that could form stars and planets.”

“And that suggests that before the first galaxy, a water-rich planetary disc could form at the dawn of space.”

Source: www.sci.news

Pushing the Boundaries of Light Speed: Unusual Particles Impacting the Laws of the Universe

We've all seen it frequently in science fiction films, so the concept seems completely plausible. Characters enter commands, and spacecraft reverse speed, jump to hyperspace, and create wormholes through space and time.

Whatever the terminology, the outcome is always the same. They fly through fictional universes faster than the speed of light, so travel between star systems is not only possible, but practical.

But in the real universe we live in, a huge barrier appears to forbid this. According to Albert Einstein's special theory of relativity, it cannot travel faster than light.

The light travels at an incredible speed of approximately 3 x 108 meters per second. This means that when you look at the universe, you won't see the heavenly objects as they are currently appearing. You can see how light from them first emerged when they departed across the universe.

Within the solar system, these delays are relatively short. For example, it takes only one second of sunlight to bounce off the surface of the moon and reach the Earth, but it takes eight minutes to cover the distance between the sun and our world.

Due to the enormous distance from us, if the sun suddenly disappears, you won't notice until 8 minutes later – Photo Credit: Getty

The more visible the longer the delay, which gives rise to the light-year concept as a measure of distance. Our closest star, Proxima Centauri, is about 4.25 light years away. In other words, it takes 4.25 years to get there from there. Therefore, the stars are not as they are now, and look like 4.25 years ago.

Beyond the vast expanse of the universe, distance is ultimately measured in billions of light years. This is what makes cosmology possible. The more we see the universe, the older the objects we see, and we can diagrammaticize today's evolution into stars and galaxies.

But if you can travel there and see what those objects look like now, wouldn't that be great?

Having a warp drive may sound like it, but it has some pretty weird results. For one thing, it would ruin the notion of causality.

Causality is our common sense perception that precedes effectiveness. But if you saw a faster spaceship trip towards you, you will see the ship in two places at once. The light carrying information about the ship's departure would not have reached the eye before the ship could be seen along the way.

Worse, the mathematics of relativity shows that if the speed exceeds the speed of light, literally time travel is possible.

This creates a full-scale causal paradox such as the famous “grandfather's paradox.” And how does it work – will you just no longer exist?

read more:

  • What happens at Black Hole Event Horizon?
  • Ghost Detector: This new machine can reveal the deepest secrets of the universe
  • Do you know what the star core looks like?

Negative energy inside

At first glance, Einstein's theory appears to protect us from such head-envelope challenges, as it appears to make it impossible to move faster than light. Masu.

According to the equation, the energy required to accelerate the ship to such a speed is infinite. However, researchers then began to look at mathematics in more detail.

A general theory of relativity – Einstein's extension of his special relativity – he proposes that the universe is made of adaptive fabrics called the space-time continuum, and he uses gravity to make this fabric I explained that it was distorted.

Who knows if tachyons exist, but if so, the theory suggests that it travels faster than light. – Image credits: Science Photography Library

1994, Physicist Dr. Miguel Alcubière At the University of Wales, and at Cardiff, we showed that solutions exist within the theory of general relativity that can be interpreted as warp drives. The problem was that it requires an exotic substance known as “negative energy” to make it work.

Astronomers have toyed using the concept of negative energy to explain why the universe appears to be accelerating, but with an understanding of physics, matter is comfortable to exist It cannot be done.

Then in May 2024, A group of researchers reexamined mathematics We will use only the types of particles and energy that make up the planet and people to see if the Alkbiere Warp phenomenon can be generated.

Their conclusion: Yes, they did. Dr. Jared Fuchs And colleagues at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, USA, discovered that they could arrange for normal material and energy to create warp phenomena and transport people through space. But there was a catch: they could only make it work at sub-light speed.

“It takes a lot of energy to make small changes to the space,” Fuchs says. To move the passenger seat, the size of a small room requires a small house-sized “warp bubble” for the size of a small room. And to make it, you need to narrow the mass of Jupiter several times. It becomes the volume that is the size of a small asteroid.

“now, [is that] Is it possible? perhaps. [Is it] Practical? I wouldn't say that,” says Fuchs. Even if it was possible to create such a device, the old boundaries still exist. To accelerate faster than the speed of light, you need an infinite amount of energy.

“We will not resolve the future of rapid transportation like Star Trek,” admits Fuchs.

Trouble with Tachon

Other researchers have conducted their own research into relativity. Professor Andrzej Dragan Collaborators at the University of Warsaw in Poland decided to consider possible solutions within the equation of particles that travel faster than light.

Physicists have previously messed with such concepts. They even called such virtual particles “tachyons,” but essentially considered them more than mathematical curiosity. However, Dragan and her colleagues found an equation explaining Tachyon's behavior.

“Mathematically, they make perfect sense,” says Dragan. In other words, our familiar world of secondary particle particles could coexist with the upper heart family of the second family, the tachyon.

Unfortunately, this does not mean that spacecraft can speed faster than light. To do that, Dragan explains that it requires the infinite energy that Einstein predicted, as well as the infinite energy to slow the Tachyon down to a sub-blue-minal speed.

“You can't exceed the speed of light in either direction,” says Dragan.

Nevertheless, the study We have proposed some fascinating results that may explain some of the most inexplicable observations physicists are working on.

When dealing with Tachon, Dragan and his colleagues encountered the causal issues they had been expecting. But the more I looked into these details, the more I realized that something surprising was happening. The strict lack of causes and effects was very similar to the behavior of normal, everyday subatomic particles.

The theory of relativity explains the behavior of the universe at its largest scale, while quantum theory describes the subatomic domain as a very different location.

Quantum theory introduces probability into particle interactions. For example, we know that an atom can absorb photons of light and at some stage it will re-emit that photon, but we cannot predict when or in which direction it will take.

In other words, the exact cause is hidden from us, and all we have left is an observable effect. Dragan suggests that when tachyon interacts with normal substances, the outcome of that interaction is unpredictable – like the emission of photons.

So, while these latest ideas do not seem to open a route to practical warp drives, they may only show a deeper look at the nature of the cosmos and the origins of quantum behavior.

About our experts

Dr. Jared Fuchs He is the CEO of Celedon Solutions Inc. and works in the Faculty of Physics at the University of Alabama in Huntsville, USA. His work has been published Classical and quantum gravity.

Professor Andrzej Dragan He is a filmmaker and professor of physics at the University of Warsaw in Poland, and a visiting professor at the National University of Singapore. His work has been published Physical review, Classic and Quatnam Gravity and New Journal of Physics.

read more:

  • What is the most powerful material in the universe?
  • This is our first photo of a star outside our galaxy
  • How the hidden “scars” of the universe unlock time travel

Source: www.sciencefocus.com