Discover an Excerpt from “Art Cure” by Daisy Fancourt: New Scientist Book Club Picks

Spending Time Painting in Cornwall, UK

Ashley Cooper/Alamy

Russell hesitated at the door, unsure whether to enter or not. This wasn’t his usual environment; he only came at the doctor’s suggestion.

His journey began with a stroke that disrupted blood flow to his brain, leading to significant challenges. He faced months of recovery, relearning skills he once took for granted. As time passed, he encountered severe back pain, lost his job, and struggled to maintain relationships, becoming depressed and overwhelmed by his situation.

When his doctor suggested eight weeks of art classes, Russell doubted the effectiveness of art as therapy. Still, feeling like he had nothing to lose, he stepped inside.

To his surprise, the first class was less intimidating than expected; he didn’t draw but observed fellow students. The calming ambiance and vibrant colors somewhat eased his anxiety. On his way home, he noticed a shift—his breathing was slower and more peaceful. The next week, he recognized familiar faces and started doodling in the garden shed during sleepless nights. By the third class, he had picked up a paintbrush. In the following weeks, he proposed a collaborative project: to paint portraits of his classmates.

I first met Russell early in the morning at a Manchester hotel. We were both preparing to appear on BBC Breakfast, where he would discuss the pioneering initiative of “prescription-based art” within the National Health Service. His experiences left me in awe of the transformation he underwent.

During his subsequent checkup, doctors were impressed with his progress; both his mood and pain levels had significantly improved. Art classes provided him with a sense of structure, something he had started to look forward to. His doctor reduced his medication, noting the improvement in his overall health and sleep quality.

As he neared the completion of his portrait series, he approached Gloucester Art Museum to host an exhibition titled “We’re All Mad Here.” The event drew fellow students and healthcare professionals, leading to requests for more commissioned works, including paintings of a nurse’s children.

Over the past decade, Russell Haynes has showcased his art throughout the UK—from Gloucester Cathedral to the Tower of London. His pieces are now highly sought after, often selling for thousands. He not only continues to create art but also teaches classes, receiving referrals from doctors. Remarkably, Russell has not taken any medication nor visited a doctor in over a year.

When I asked him about the impact of those initial art classes, he stated simply:

“They saved my life.”

This excerpt is from a work by Daisy Fancourt. Art Cure: The Science of How Art Changes Our Health (Cornerstone Press), part of the New Scientist Book Club’s March selection. Join us for a shared reading experience here.

Topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Discover Daisy Fancourt’s Insights on Art as Medicine: ‘If Art Had the Healing Power of Medicine, We’d Embrace It Daily’

Regular Engagement with Arts: Transformative Physiological Changes

Mascot/Getty Images

Reflecting on my journey into research on the health benefits of art, a pivotal moment stands out. After completing my education, I began working at the NHS, overseeing performing arts programs at Chelsea and Westminster Hospitals in London. One patient’s relative approached me post-performance in a dementia ward and said, “What a wonderful entertainment program you are running.”

This comment, albeit well-intentioned, overlooked the profound impact of our Hospital Arts Program. I personally witnessed transformative effects: a patient, despite memory loss, sang along to White Cliffs of Dover, evoking childhood memories. I observed a child with severe burns who required no morphine during a theater performance, a premature baby who calmed and began eating while his mother sang, and a stroke survivor who walked more steadily upon wearing headphones. While our arts programs offered enjoyable distractions, I recognized their deeper significance in enhancing patients’ health. My curiosity led me to seek a deeper understanding of these effects.

Over the past decade, I have dedicated my research as a psychobiologist and epidemiologist to acknowledge the health benefits associated with art engagement. Findings from numerous global studies reveal that activities like reading, listening to music, dancing, or crafting activate essential biological processes that support our health. Participating in the arts stimulates our brain’s reward system, elevating dopamine levels tied to mood and pleasure. Furthermore, we regulate autonomic nervous system activity, which contributes to lower heart rates and decreased blood pressure over time. Notably, our stress hormones diminish, as do inflammatory responses within our immune system. We can even modify gene expression, reducing stress-related genes while enhancing those that promote neurogenesis.

Regularly engaging in arts over extended periods fosters significant physiological changes. It’s shown to increase gray matter in brain regions vital for memory, auditory processing, and motor skills. Furthermore, we produce unique protein patterns associated with improved cognitive function and a reduced risk of depression and infections. A recent study employing various biological metrics, including brain clocks and epigenetic evaluations, indicates that consistent engagement with the arts correlates with a younger biological age.

These profound changes significantly influence our overall well-being. Individuals who actively participate in the arts tend to report greater happiness, enhanced life satisfaction, purpose, and a reduced risk of developing conditions such as depression, chronic pain, frailty, and even dementia. These beneficial relationships hold even when accounting for factors like wealth, demographics, medical history, or lifestyle choices.

These promising results are drawn from randomized controlled trials, laboratory experiments, and large-scale epidemiological studies examining the art’s population-level impacts. Numerous specific artistic interventions in medical settings for designated patient groups—like singing programs for stroke survivors or dance classes for individuals with Parkinson’s disease—underscore art’s potential benefits. Some trials suggest that art might be even more effective for managing pre-operative anxiety than traditional anti-anxiety medications like benzodiazepines, with fewer side effects proving its efficacy.

Nevertheless, while engaging in the arts is a promising avenue of exploration, it is not a cure-all. Various instances of art-related harm exist due to misuse or inadequate project design. I have actively countered misconceptions, such as the idea of art as a cure for boosting intelligence or combating serious health issues like cancer. Although the field remains ripe with potential and ongoing research, we eagerly anticipate larger-scale trials.

If a medication boasted this array of health benefits, we would enthusiastically promote it, invest resources in its development, and ensure its accessibility. It is exhilarating to watch the recommendations I promote materialize—not as prescriptions or medical interventions, but as enjoyable experiences like attending a concert, participating in dance lessons, or simply reading a book, potentially including my own.

Daisy Fancourt is the author of Art Cure: The Science of How Art Changes Our Health (Cornerstone Press) and featured in the March reading list of the New Scientist Book Club. Join us here to participate in the discussion!

Topics:

  • Health/
  • New Scientist Book Club

Source: www.newscientist.com