A novel theory proposed by Gunther Kettetschka, a researcher at Fairbanks University in Alaska, suggests that we exist in three dimensions rather than the single dimension we perceive continuously, with space serving as a secondary byproduct.
Time, not space and time, can be a single fundamental property in which all physical phenomena occur. Image credit: M. Weiss/Harvard – Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.
“These three dimensions of time constitute the fundamental layers, akin to the canvas of a painting,” Dr. Kettetschka stated.
“While space exists in three dimensions, it is not the canvas itself; rather, it resembles the paint on the canvas.”
“These concepts starkly contrast established physics, which maintains that our reality comprises a single time dimension alongside three spatial dimensions.”
“This is referred to as space-time, a notion developed over a century ago that regards time and space as a single entity.”
Dr. Kettetschka’s mathematical model, which integrates time and space, seeks to provide a unified explanation of the universe.
Understanding time’s dimensions beyond our daily experience is challenging. Theoretical physicists have explored numerous variations.
This latest research contributes to a long-term body of work among theoretical physicists exploring ideas beyond mainstream physics.
“Prior three-dimensional time proposals largely consisted of mathematical constructs lacking concrete experimental connections,” Dr. Kettetschka noted.
“My research transforms intriguing mathematical concepts into physically testable theories through various independent validation methods.”
“This theory has the potential to predict unknown particle properties and aid in uncovering the origin of mass, ultimately addressing one of physics’ greatest enigmas.”
The concept of three-dimensional time includes multiple independent trajectories, similar to time and space. It can be visualized as three axes of temporal motion, akin to the spatial X, Y, and Z axes.
Imagine walking straight ahead, perceiving time as we typically do. Now envision another path intersecting the first, allowing lateral movement.
If you could traverse sideways while remaining in the same moment of ‘normal’ time, you’d recognize that scenarios may slightly differ, potentially representing alternate versions of the same day.
Following this vertical path lets you explore various outcomes of the day without advancing forward as we understand it.
The existence of these alternative outcomes represents the second dimension of time, while the third dimension pertains to the transition from one outcome to another.
“This theory addresses issues confronted by earlier three-dimensional time theories based on traditional physics,” Dr. Kettetschka highlighted.
“For instance, previous theories often presented ambiguous cause-and-effect relationships when discussing multiple time dimensions.”
“The new theory utilizes more complex mathematical frameworks to ensure clear precedence of effects caused, even in the context of multiple time dimensions.”
According to the 3D time perspective, the second and third dimensions are particularly conceptualized by theoretical physicist Yitzhakuber at the University of Southern California, likely manifesting at extreme energy levels, such as those present in the early universe and high-energy particle collisions.
This innovative approach might help confront significant challenges within the realm of unresolved physics: unifying quantum mechanics—the behavior of particles at the most minute scale—with gravity, towards an overarching quantum gravity theory.
The theory of quantum gravity has the potential to evolve into a grand theory encompassing the universe and all related theories.
A central goal of this elusive unified theory is to integrate the four fundamental forces of nature: electromagnetic, strong nuclear, weak nuclear, and gravity.
The standard model of particle physics unifies the first three forces, while gravity is addressed through Albert Einstein’s theory of general relativity.
Since the two frameworks are incompatible, physicists are striving for a theoretical synthesis. Pinpointing the origin of particle mass is crucial to this endeavor.
Dr. Kettetschka is optimistic that the three-dimensional time theory can be beneficial.
This framework effectively replicates the masses of known particles like electrons, moons, and quarks, providing insights into why these particles possess their specific masses.
“Achieving unity may necessitate a fundamental reassessment of the very nature of physical reality,” Dr. Kettetschka remarked.
“This theory demonstrates how perceiving time as three-dimensional can elegantly resolve multiple physics puzzles within a cohesive mathematical framework.”
His paper was published in the journal Report on Advances in Physical Science.
____
Gunther Kletetschka. 2025. 3D Time: Mathematical Framework for Fundamental Physics. Report on Advances in Physical Science 9:2550004; doi:10.1142/s2424942425500045
Source: www.sci.news
