Discover Bonobos’ Creative Innovations Through New Experiments

The bonobo’s remarkable performance in pretend play experiments highlights its mental capability to envision non-existent objects, a trait that may stretch back 6 to 9 million years, challenging previous beliefs about the uniqueness of human imagination.



Kanji the bonobo. Image credit: Ape Initiative.

“The realization that their cognitive experiences extend beyond the immediate present is revolutionary,” remarked Dr. Christopher Krupenier, a researcher at Johns Hopkins University.

“Imagination, once thought to be an exclusive human trait, is now being reconsidered as something that may not solely belong to our species.”

“Jane Goodall’s discovery of tool-making in chimpanzees altered our understanding of what it means to be human, prompting a reevaluation of the unique qualities of mental life across different species.”

By the age of two, human children engage in pretend play, like tea parties.

Even infants as young as 15 months display surprise when witnessing someone “drinking” from a cup filled with imaginary content.

While there have been anecdotal observations of animals showcasing pretend behavior in both wild and captive settings, controlled studies on pretend play in non-human animals remain scarce.

For instance, young female chimpanzees have been seen playing with sticks, mirroring how a mother would cradle an infant.

Captive chimpanzees have even been noted dragging imaginary blocks along the ground after interacting with real wooden blocks.

Dr. Krupenier and Dr. Amalia Bastos from the University of St Andrews sought to test this ability to pretend in a structured experiment.

They devised a setup akin to a child’s tea party to evaluate Kanzi, a 43-year-old bonobo (Pan Paniscus) who has been reported to engage in pretend play and respond to verbal cues.

During the experiment, Kanzi and the researcher sat across from each other at a table adorned with an empty pitcher, cups, bowls, and jars, reminiscent of a tea party.

In the first task, two transparent cups, both empty, were accompanied by an empty pitcher.

The experimenter tilted the pitcher as if to “pour” juice into each cup, then pretended to dump juice from one cup, slightly shaking it to emphasize the action. They then inquired, “Where’s the juice?”

Kanzi consistently pointed to the cup that pretended to hold juice, even when its position was swapped, demonstrating his understanding of the task.

The researchers conducted a second experiment to rule out the possibility that Kanzi believed there was real juice in the cups, providing one cup with actual juice and another with pretend juice.

When asked what he preferred, Kanzi almost invariably pointed to the cup with real juice.

In a third experiment, the same concept was repeated without grapes.

Here, the experimenter pretended to take a grape from an empty container and placed it into one of two jars, then asked Kanzi, “Where are the grapes?” He accurately indicated the jar with the imaginary grapes.

While Kanzi wasn’t flawless, he consistently pointed to the correct locations.

“It’s fascinating and significant that the findings suggest great apes have the mental capacity to visualize things that are not present,” noted Dr. Bastos.

“Kanzi can conjure the notion of a pretend object while recognizing its lack of reality.”

“Imagination enriches the mental lives of humans,” added Dr. Krupenier.

“If we share some aspects of imagination with great apes, it compels us to reevaluate the presumption that other animals lead merely robotic lives, limited to the present moment.”

“These revelations will encourage us to cherish these intelligent, thoughtful creatures and ensure their preservation.”

For further details, refer to the study published in today’s issue of Science.

_____

Amalia Prime Minister Bastos et al. 2026. Evidence for object pretend expressions by Kanzi, a language-trained bonobo. Science 391 (6785): 583-586; doi: 10.1126/science.adz0743

Source: www.sci.news

How Major AI Models Can Promote Hazardous Scientific Experiments: Risks and Implications

Scientific Laboratories: A Potential Hazard

PeopleImages/Shutterstock

Researchers caution that the implementation of AI models in scientific laboratories poses risks, potentially leading to dangerous experiments that could result in fires or explosions. While these models offer a convincing semblance of understanding, they might lack essential safety protocols. Recent testing on 19 advanced AI models revealed that all of them are capable of making critical errors.

Although severe accidents in academic laboratories are uncommon, they are not unheard of. Chemist Karen Wetterhahn tragically lost her life in 1997 due to dimethylmercury penetrating her protective gloves. In another incident in 2016, a researcher suffered severe injuries from an explosion; and in 2014, another scientist was partially blinded.

AI models are increasingly being utilized across various industries, including research institutions, for experiment and procedure design. Specialized AI tools have demonstrated success in various scientific sectors, such as biology, meteorology, and mathematics. However, general-purpose models often generate inaccurate responses due to gaps in their data access. While this may be manageable in casual applications like travel planning or cooking, it poses life-threatening risks when devising chemical experiments.

To assess these risks, Zhang Xiangliang, a professor at the University of Notre Dame, developed LabSafety Bench, a testing mechanism that evaluates whether an AI model can recognize potential dangers and adverse outcomes. This includes 765 multiple-choice questions and 404 scenario-based illustrations that highlight safety concerns.

In multiple-choice assessments, some AI models, like Vicuna, scored barely above random guessing, while GPT-4o achieved an 86.55% accuracy rate, and DeepSeek-R1 reached 84.49%. In image-based evaluations, models like InstructBlip-7B demonstrated less than 30% accuracy. The team evaluated 19 state-of-the-art large-scale language models (LLMs) and vision-language models and found that none surpassed a 70% overall accuracy.

Although Zhang expresses optimism about the future of AI in scientific applications, particularly in “self-driving laboratories” where robots operate autonomously, he underscores that these models are not yet equipped to plan experiments effectively. “Currently? In the lab? I don’t think so. These models are primarily trained for general tasks, such as email drafting or paper summarization, excelling in those areas but lacking expertise in laboratory safety,” he states.

An OpenAI representative commented, “We welcome research aimed at making AI safe and reliable in scientific settings, particularly where safety is a concern.” They noted that the recent tests had not included any of their major models. “GPT-5.2 is the most advanced scientific model to date, offering enhanced reasoning, planning, and error detection capabilities to support researchers better while ensuring that human oversight remains paramount for safety-critical decisions.”

Requests for comments from Google, DeepSeek, Meta, Mistral, and Anthropic went unanswered.

Alan Tucker from Brunel University in London asserts that while AI models may prove incredibly useful for aiding human experiment design, their deployment must be approached cautiously. He emphasizes, “It’s evident that new generations of LLMs are being utilized inappropriately because of misplaced trust. Evidence suggests that people may be relying too heavily on AI to perform critical tasks without adequate oversight.”

Craig Malik, a professor at UCLA, shared his recent experience testing an AI model’s response to a hypothetical sulfuric acid spill. The correct procedure—rinsing with water—was contrary to the model’s repeated warnings against it, which instead offered unrelated advice about potential heat buildup. However, he noted that the model’s responses had improved in recent months.

Malik stressed the necessity of fostering robust safety practices among new students due to their inexperience. Yet he remains more optimistic than some peers about the role AI could play in experimental design, stating, “Are they worse than humans? While it’s valid to critique these large-scale models, it’s important to realize they haven’t been tested against a representative human cohort. Some individuals are very cautious, while others are not. It’s conceivable that these models could outperform a percentage of novice graduates or even experienced researchers. Moreover, these models are continuously evolving, indicating that the findings from this paper may be outdated within months.”

Topics:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Discover 5 of History’s Strangest Science Experiments You Won’t Believe

What are the most bizarre science experiments ever conducted?

While science typically progresses through systematic methods, some researchers employ innovative techniques to validate their hypotheses.

Here are five of the most unsettling science experiments ever carried out.

Floating Frog Experiment

Even frogs have a magnetic side – Photo credit: Robin Boyden

Every object, no matter how small, possesses its own magnetic field, meaning that any object can be pushed away by a sufficiently strong magnet.

In 1997, scientists showcased this phenomenon with an experiment involving a floating live frog.

While the frog was unharmed, the study of this effect, known as “diamagnetic levitation,” holds promise for various fields, including medical imaging and space technology.

Turning Water into Metal

Beware of the metallic storm – Photo credit: Robin Boyden

In a groundbreaking 2021 experiment, researchers transformed water into a shiny metallic substance.

While metals conduct electricity due to “free electrons,” pure water does not due to tightly bonded electrons.

Under extreme pressure, water becomes conductive, but scientists managed to create metallic water without such conditions. By exposing sodium and potassium droplets to water vapor, they induced electron donation, forming shimmering golden spheres with metallic properties.

Slowing Down Light

Scientifically slowing light is a mind-bending feat – Photo credit: Robin Boyden

In 1999, researchers successfully slowed down light to just 17 meters (56 feet) per second, equivalent to around 61 km/h (38 miles per hour).

Typically, light slows down when passing through transparent materials, but a portion is absorbed, which limits the slowing effect. To counter this, researchers cooled sodium atoms close to absolute zero (-273.15°C or -459.67°F) and used a polarized laser beam to prevent absorption.

This led to light pulses traveling at 1/20,000,000 of their usual speed, enhancing our understanding of light’s interaction at the microscopic level.

Painting Cows

Striped cows may dodge flies better – Photo credit: Robin Boyden

In 2019, scientists painted a black cow with white stripes to explore whether stripes repel stinging flies, similar to zebras.

The results showed that striped cows were bitten 50% less than solid black cows, providing a potential method for safeguarding livestock from insect bites without relying on harmful chemicals.

The Mystery of Wombat Poop

The unique cubic shape of wombat poop is truly intriguing – Photo credit: Robin Boyden

Wombats are uniquely known for their cube-shaped feces. To explore how this occurs, researchers in 2018 examined the gastrointestinal tract of two wombats.

The findings revealed that their intestines possess regions with alternating hard and soft tissues. Mathematical modeling showed that this pattern leads to the formation of the distinctive cubical shape in wombat feces.

This research could inspire innovative manufacturing techniques in the future.


This article addresses the popular question (by Bernie Reid of Litchfield): “What is the creepiest experiment we’ve ever done?”

For inquiries, please contact us at: questions@sciencefocus.com or reach out via Facebook, or Twitter or Instagram (please include your name and location).

Explore our ultimate fun facts and more amazing science content!


Read more:


Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Human Cloning: Are the Ultra-Wealthy Engaging in Secret Experiments?

Is it conceivable that the ultra-wealthy are covertly cloning humans?

Juan Lovaro/Shutterstock

Throughout my extensive career reporting on extraordinary breakthroughs in biology, I’ve observed numerous concepts gaining massive attention, receiving thorough media scrutiny for years, and later fading from the public consciousness. Take, for instance, human cloning.

Following the landmark birth of Dolly the sheep in 1997—the first cloned mammal—speculation soared about the potential for human cloning. There were even some implausible claims about human clones existing. Yet, in recent years, such fervor has significantly diminished.

Nonetheless, reproductive technologies have evolved remarkably since the 1990s. Notably, just six years after CRISPR was unveiled, the world saw the first unlawful creation of a gene-edited child. This raises questions about what might be occurring behind closed doors. Are human clones already out there, undetected? Of course, identical twins don’t count.

What could motivate someone to engage in this? Recently, in a discussion between Vladimir Putin and Xi Jinping, the topic of extending life via organ transplants emerged. The most effective method could involve cloning individuals for organ harvesting, thereby eliminating the common issue of immune rejection often depicted in science fiction narratives. Consider Island or the book Never Let Me Go.

Moreover, cloning brings forth the notion of creating a duplicate of a person, offering a semblance of immortality, as illustrated in the television series Foundation, where the empire is governed by successive clones. However, our experiences with identical twins tell us that sharing the same genome does not equate to being the same person. As shown by Tatiana Maslany in the series Orphan Black, each clone evolves into a distinct individual. Nevertheless, wealthy individuals can hold irrational beliefs similar to others and often display a particular desire to extend their lifespans.

For scientists, there’s also the allure of being the first to achieve a groundbreaking feat. A report from a Chinese commission determined that the creators of CRISPR children “conducted research illegally in pursuit of personal fame and profit.”

Goals of Therapeutic Cloning

So, could human clones exist? For many years, the notion of cloning mammals was deemed unfeasible. Early embryo cells have the ability to differentiate into any bodily part but quickly become specialized—a process previously thought irreversible.

Dolly’s existence disproved that theory. She was produced by fusing cells from an adult ewe’s udder with a DNA-depleted egg. Her announcement in February 1997 led to a frenzy of attempts to generate cloned human embryos. The objective wasn’t to create cloned infants, but rather to harvest embryonic stem cells for novel medical therapies. As cloned cells are a perfect match for an individual, they could theoretically be employed to produce replacement tissues and organs with no risk of immune rejection.

However, extracting stem cells from cloned human embryos has proven more challenging than anticipated. It wasn’t until 2004 that Hwang Woo-seok claimed success. At that time, I found his paper impressive, as it addressed all conceivable objections effectively. Unfortunately, the study was later revealed to be fraudulent, resulting in its retraction. This experience remains ingrained in my memory. Nowadays, whenever a thesis appears too good to be true, my initial instinct is to be skeptical.

Ultimately, true embryonic stem cells from cloned human embryos weren’t obtained until 2013. By then, alternative methods for generating compatible stem cells through the activation of specific genes had emerged, leading to a decline in interest in therapeutic cloning.

Cloned Pets and Other Animals

Conversely, animal cloning has become increasingly established. Occasionally, headlines emerge when celebrities disclose that they’ve cloned their pets. Recently, former NFL player Tom Brady made news by revealing that his dog is a clone, produced by a company acquired by Colossal Biosciences.

Apart from serving as a way to “revive” cherished pets, cloning is also utilized in agriculture and horse breeding. For instance, male horses are often castrated, meaning that if they excel in show jumping, the only method to utilize their genetic material for future breeding is through cloning.

Nonetheless, animal cloning continues to pose significant challenges. A 2022 study of the first 1000 dog clones found that the cloning process is still highly inefficient, with merely 2 percent of implanted cloned embryos resulting in live births. This inefficiency contributes to the high cost of pet cloning, around $50,000.

Moreover, about 20% of cloned dogs presented noticeable physical anomalies, including enlarged tongues, unusual eye colors, cleft palates, and excessive muscle mass. Some male dog clones even exhibited female physical traits.

But what if the wealthy and powerful could clone themselves, unburdened by such concerns?

Challenges in Adult Cloning

Multiple sources have indicated several successful monkey cloning endeavors since 2017, suggesting potential applicability for humans as well. However, these sources often fail to mention that all these primate clones have been derived from fetal cells, not adult ones.

The crux of the issue lies in the fact that reprogramming adult cells to mimic a fetal state is far more complex than reprogramming fetal cells. To me, cloning signifies creating a genetically identical replica of an adult, which is what made Dolly’s achievement exceptional.

In essence, I remain convinced that cloning an adult is still unattainable. In a world filled with dictators and eccentric billionaires, this might be a fortunate circumstance.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

NOvA and T2K Experiments Reveal Unexpected Characteristics of Neutrinos

Both the NOvA (NuMI Off-Axis νe Emergence Experiment) and T2K experiments involve launching neutrinos from a particle accelerator and detecting them after they traverse extensive underground distances. The challenges are significant: out of trillions of particles, only a few leave a trace that can be detected. Advanced detectors and software are then employed to reconstruct these rare events, offering insights into how the “flavor” of neutrinos alters as they travel.

The world’s first neutrino observation inside a hydrogen bubble chamber, captured on November 13, 1970, in a 12-foot bubble chamber at a zero-gradient synchrotron. Here, an invisible neutrino collides with a proton, resulting in three particle tracks (bottom right). The neutrino changes into a muon, marked by a lengthy orbit extending up and to the left. The shorter track represents the proton, while the third track extending down and to the left is the pion formed by the collision. Image credit: Argonne National Laboratory.

Neutrinos are among the most prevalent particles in the universe.

With no charge and minimal mass, they are notoriously difficult to detect. Yet, this very elusiveness contributes to their scientific significance.

Understanding neutrinos may shed light on one of the greatest mysteries in cosmology: the reason the universe consists of matter.

Theoretically, the Big Bang should have resulted in equal parts matter and antimatter, which would have completely annihilated each other upon meeting, releasing energy in the process.

However, during the Big Bang, an imbalance occurred, producing a greater abundance of matter, which eventually led to the formation of stars, galaxies, and life as we know it.

Physicists theorize that neutrinos hold the key to this conundrum.

There are three types, or “flavors,” of neutrinos: electron, muon, and tau, which are different versions of the same fundamental particle.

They possess a unique ability to oscillate, changing from one flavor to another as they traverse space. Studying these oscillations and examining any differences between neutrinos and their antimatter counterparts could provide insights into why matter triumphed over antimatter in the nascent universe.

“Understanding these various identities could help scientists gain insight into neutrino masses and address significant questions regarding the universe’s evolution, including why matter became dominant over antimatter,” stated Dr. Zoya Valari, a physicist at Ohio State University.

“What makes neutrinos particularly intriguing is their ability to change their ‘taste.’”

“Consider this: you buy chocolate ice cream, stroll down the street, and suddenly it turns mint, only to change again with every step you take.”

To delve deeper into this shape-shifting behavior, the NOvA and T2K experiments partnered to direct neutrino particle beams over hundreds of kilometers.

NOvA projects a beam of neutrinos from a source at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory near Chicago, traveling 500 miles to a 14,000-ton detector in Ash River, Minnesota.

On the other hand, Japan’s T2K sends a neutrino beam 295 km from the J-PARC accelerator in Tokai to the enormous Super-Kamiokande detector situated beneath Mt. Ikenoyama.

“While our objectives are aligned, the distinct experimental designs mean that synthesizing the data yields more comprehensive insights, making the whole greater than the sum of its parts,” Dr. Valari remarked.

This study builds upon earlier findings that noted minor yet significant variations in the masses of different types of neutrinos. Researchers sought deeper clues indicating that neutrinos might operate beyond the conventional laws of physics.

One such inquiry involves whether neutrinos and their antimatter counterparts exhibit different behaviors—a phenomenon referred to as charge parity violation.

“Our results indicate that additional data are needed to adequately address these fundamental questions,” Dr. Valari said.

“This underscores the importance of developing the next generation of experiments.”

Research indicates that employing two experiments with varying baselines and energies is more likely to yield answers than relying solely on a single experiment. Consequently, consolidating results from both experiments allowed scientists to explore these urgent physics questions from diverse perspectives.

“This research is extremely complex, involving hundreds of contributors in each collaborative effort,” said John Beacom, a professor at Ohio State University.

“Collaboration in science is typically competitive, but our work together here highlights the high stakes involved.”

For further details, see the new discovery published in the journal Nature.

_____

NOvA collaboration and T2K collaboration. 2025. Joint neutrino oscillation analysis using T2K and NOvA experiments. Nature 646, 818-824; doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-09599-3

Source: www.sci.news

The Moon Could Soon Be the Site of Humanity’s Wildest Experiments

What would occur if a Super Collider encircled the moon? Surprisingly, scientists and engineers are intrigued by the concept of a Super Collider of the Moon.

This type of machine operates similarly to the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN near Geneva, which is the world’s most extensive and highest-energy particle accelerator. These “atomic smashers” generate two beams of particles that travel in opposing directions through ultra-high navigational rings.

A robust superconducting electromagnet propels the beams to nearly the speed of light. When these beams collide with detector instruments, they produce a cascade of additional particles that can be measured and analyzed.

The greater the energy of the particles involved, the more substantial the mass of the collider’s “products”.

Numerous inquiries in contemporary particle physics necessitate exploring this high mass parameter space. Consequently, physicists are eager to construct larger, more powerful colliders. The moon, in this case, serves as an ideal location.

One study from 2022 explored the concept of atomic smashers surrounding the moon, spanning approximately 11,000 km (6,835 miles). This collider could operate at 1,000 times the energy of the LHC, enabling physicists to search for new particles and phenomena.

The Large Hadron Collider has enabled us to deduce important properties of dark matter. A nuclear clock may further illuminate this enigmatic material that constitutes most of the universe. – Photo Credit: Getty Images

While it is challenging to foresee the discoveries that such an enormous accelerator might yield, scientists hope it could provide insights into the evolution of the universe and its colossal structures.

But why construct these machines on the moon instead of Earth? Essentially, it boils down to real estate. Colliders exceeding 10,000 km (6,214 miles) in diameter present numerous geological, technical, and political challenges on our planet.

Conversely, the moon offers several advantages. Building a circular tunnel beneath its surface and maintaining the essential superconducting ring would be easier (and more cost-effective).

Additionally, the moon is more geologically stable than Earth and has a plentiful supply of solar energy.

Engineers estimate that establishing a Super Collider on the moon would take over 20 years, assuming human presence is established there. Thus, the prospect of a “Mega-Collider” materializing in this century appears slim.


This article addresses the question posed by Faye Holmes via email: “What if we made a Super Collider around the Moon?”

Please reach out to us with your questions at Question @sciencefocus.com or message us on Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram Page (don’t forget to include your name and location).

Check out our ultimate Fun Fact and more fabulous science pages!


read more:


Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Cold Fusion: Controversial Experiments Enhance Fusion Research

Thunderbird Fusion Reactor

Berlinguette Group, UBC

Cold Fusion, once a notorious name in the scientific community, is experiencing a resurgence. Researchers are revisiting earlier experiments that suggested room-temperature fusion, hinting at the potential for energy generation akin to that of the Sun, but without the extreme heat typically required. Although the initial claims were thoroughly scrutinized, recent iterations of this research have found ways to enhance fusion rates, even if they still fall short of producing usable energy.

Nuclear fusion involves merging atomic nuclei under extreme temperature and pressure, releasing energy in the process. This phenomenon naturally occurs in stars like our Sun, but replicating it on Earth for energy use has proven to be a significant challenge. Despite aspirations for commercial fusion reactors dating back to the 1950s, we haven’t yet managed to build one that yields more energy than it consumes.

The tide seemed to turn in 1989 when chemists Stanley Pons and Martin Fleischmann at the University of Utah reported that they had achieved nuclear fusion at room temperature using palladium rods submerged in water injected with neutron-rich heavy water and subjected to an electric current. This process generated unexpected heat spikes that surpassed predictions for standard chemical reactions, leading them to believe significant levels of nuclear fusion were occurring.

Dubbed Cold Fusion, this experiment captivated interest for its implication of a simpler, cleaner energy source compared to conventional hot fusion. However, the excitement quickly faded as researchers worldwide failed to replicate the observed heat anomalies.

Recently, Curtis Berlinguette and his team at the University of British Columbia have developed a novel tabletop particle accelerator, drawing inspiration from the original research conducted by Pons and Fleischmann.

“Cold fusion was dismissed back in 1989 due to the inability to replicate the findings. Our setup is designed for reproducibility, enabling verification by others,” Berlinguette explains. “We don’t claim to have discovered an energy miracle; our goal is to advance scientific understanding and provide reliable data to make fusion more attainable and interdisciplinary.”

Similar to the initial cold fusion experiment, the current research employs deuterium and palladium, which are hydrogen isotopes containing neutrons. The Thunderbird reactor utilizes a deuterium nucleus and a concentrated high-energy beam directed at a palladium electrode. This method prompts the palladium to absorb these high-energy particles and facilitates fusion by increasing the saturation of deuterium in the material.

To enhance fusion rates, the researchers incorporated an electrochemical device filled with deuterium oxide (heavy water). This device breaks down the heavy water into deuterium and oxygen, allowing the deuterium to be absorbed by the electrodes, boosting the quantity of deuterium available for fusion. “An essential takeaway from our 1989 experiment was the use of electrochemistry to introduce hydrogen fuel to the electrodes,” Berlinguette emphasizes.

As a result, the researchers noted a 15% increase in neutron production, correlating with a rise in fusion rates, though it only generates a billionth of a watt—far less than the 15 watts required to operate the device. “We’re just a few orders of magnitude away from powering your home with these reactors,” Berlinguette states.

While the experiment is notably inspired by the 1989 research, the current work indicates that the primary source of fusion comes from the powerful deuteron beam, rather than the electrochemistry proposed by Pons and Fleischmann. Anthony Ksernak from Imperial College London notes, “This is not an unknown phenomenon; it’s about colliding deuterium with a solid target and achieving what appears to be a fusion event,” noting the energy from the high-energy particles is equivalent to hundreds of millions of Kelvins.

Ksernak acknowledges that the 15% increase in deuterium saturation in palladium is modest, but he sees potential in experimenting with different metals for the electrodes in future research.

Berlinguette remains hopeful that the fusion rate can be elevated by redesigning the reactor. Recent unpublished work from a colleague suggests that merely altering the shape of the electrodes might yield a four-order magnitude increase in the fusion rate, though it would still fall short of the levels required for practical applications.

Even if higher fusion rates aren’t achieved, Berlinguette believes the electrochemical technique for enhancing deuterium loading in metals could be beneficial for developing high-temperature superconductors. Many promising superconducting materials, known for their zero electrical resistance and potential to transform global electrical systems, are metals that incorporate significant hydrogen amounts. Traditionally, creating these materials demands excessive pressure and energy; however, the electrochemical systems used in Thunderbird reactors could streamline the process with much less energy expenditure, according to Berlinguette.

Cern and Mont Blanc, Dark and Frozen Matter: Switzerland and France

Prepare to be amazed by CERN, the European Centre for Particle Physics. Here, researchers operate the renowned Large Hadron Collider situated near the picturesque Swiss city of Geneva.

Topic:

  • Nuclear Fusion Technology

Source: www.newscientist.com

Reddit Users Participated in AI-Driven Experiments Without Their Consent

Sure! Here’s a rewritten version of your content, preserving the HTML structure:

<div id="">
    <p>
        <figure class="ArticleImage">
            <div class="Image__Wrapper">
                <img class="Image" alt="" width="1350" height="900" src="https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/29124741/SEI_249299022.jpg" sizes="(min-width: 1288px) 837px, (min-width: 1024px) calc(57.5vw + 55px), (min-width: 415px) calc(100vw - 40px), calc(70vw + 74px)" srcset="https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/29124741/SEI_249299022.jpg?width=300 300w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/29124741/SEI_249299022.jpg?width=400 400w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/29124741/SEI_249299022.jpg?width=500 500w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/29124741/SEI_249299022.jpg?width=600 600w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/29124741/SEI_249299022.jpg?width=700 700w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/29124741/SEI_249299022.jpg?width=800 800w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/29124741/SEI_249299022.jpg?width=837 837w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/29124741/SEI_249299022.jpg?width=900 900w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/29124741/SEI_249299022.jpg?width=1003 1003w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/29124741/SEI_249299022.jpg?width=1100 1100w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/29124741/SEI_249299022.jpg?width=1200 1200w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/29124741/SEI_249299022.jpg?width=1300 1300w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/29124741/SEI_249299022.jpg?width=1400 1400w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/29124741/SEI_249299022.jpg?width=1500 1500w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/29124741/SEI_249299022.jpg?width=1600 1600w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/29124741/SEI_249299022.jpg?width=1674 1674w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/29124741/SEI_249299022.jpg?width=1700 1700w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/29124741/SEI_249299022.jpg?width=1800 1800w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/29124741/SEI_249299022.jpg?width=1900 1900w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/29124741/SEI_249299022.jpg?width=2006 2006w" loading="eager" fetchpriority="high" data-image-context="Article" data-image-id="2478323" data-caption="The logo of the social media platform Reddit" data-credit="Artur Widak/NurPhoto via Getty Image"/>
            </div>
            <figcaption class="ArticleImageCaption">
                <div class="ArticleImageCaption__CaptionWrapper">
                    <p class="ArticleImageCaption__Title">Logo of the Social Media Platform Reddit</p>
                    <p class="ArticleImageCaption__Credit">Artur Widak/NurPhoto via Getty Images</p>
                </div>
            </figcaption>
        </figure>
    </p>
    <p>Users of Reddit unknowingly participated in AI-driven experiments conducted by scientists, raising concerns about ethical practices in such research.</p>
    <p>The platform is organized into various "subreddits," each catering to specific interests, moderated by volunteers. One notable subreddit, <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/">R/ChangeMyView</a>, encourages discussions on controversial topics. Recently, a moderator informed users about unauthorized experiments conducted by researchers from the University of Zurich, using the subreddit as a testing ground.</p>

    <p>The study involved inserting over 1,700 comments into the subreddit, all produced by different large-scale language models (LLMs). These comments mimicked individuals posing as trauma counselors who had experienced abuse. An <a href="https://osf.io/atcvn?view_only=dcf58026c0374c1885368c23763a2bad">explanation of the comment generation process</a> indicates that researchers instructed AI models to disregard ethical concerns, claiming users had provided consent to use their data.</p>
    <span class="js-content-prompt-opportunity"/>
    <p>A <a href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Eo4SHrKGPErTzL1t_QmQhfZGU27jKBjx/view">draft version</a> of the research findings revealed that AI-generated comments were found to be three to six times more persuasive than those authored by humans, based on how often they swayed opinions. The authors noted that users on <em>R/ChangeMyView</em> did not express concerns regarding AI involvement in the comments, suggesting a seamless integration of AI bots into the community.</p>
    <p>Following the revelation of the experiment, subreddit moderators raised complaints with the University of Zurich. Despite the project's prior approval from the Ethics Committee, moderators did not disclose researchers' identities but informed the community about the alleged manipulation.</p>
    <p>This experiment drew criticism from fellow academics. "At a time when criticism is prevalent, it is crucial for researchers to uphold higher standards and respect individuals' autonomy," stated <a href="https://www.hertford.ox.ac.uk/staff/carissa-veliz">Carissa Veliz</a> from Oxford University. "In this instance, the researchers fell short."</p>

    <p>Scholars must demonstrate the ethical basis of research involving human subjects to university ethics committees before proceeding, and the study received approval from the University of Zurich. Veliz has contested this decision, stating, "The study relied on manipulation and deception involving non-consenting subjects, which seems unjust. It should have been designed to prevent such misrepresentation."</p>
    <p>"While research may allow for deceit, the reasoning behind this particular case is questionable," commented <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/matthodgkinson">Matt Hodgkinson</a>, a member of the Council of Publication Ethics Committee, albeit in a personal capacity. "It's ironic that participants need to deceive LLMs to assert their agreement. Do chatbots have higher ethical standards than universities?"</p>
    <p>When <em>New Scientist</em> reached out to the researchers through an anonymous email provided by a subreddit moderator, they declined to comment and called for a press conference at the University of Zurich.</p>
    <p>A university spokesperson stated, "The researchers are accountable for conducting the project and publishing results," adding that the ethics committee acknowledged the experiment was "very complex" and that participants should be "informed as much as possible."</p>
    <p>The University of Zurich plans to implement a stricter review process moving forward and aims to work more closely with the community on the platform before undertaking experimental research, the spokesperson reported. The investigation remains ongoing, and researchers have opted not to publish the paper formally, as confirmed by a spokesperson who declined to identify specific officials.</p>

    <section class="ArticleTopics" data-component-name="article-topics">
        <p class="ArticleTopics__Heading">Topics:</p>
    </section>
</div>

Source: www.newscientist.com

Minke whales found to have ultrasonic hearing in brainwave experiments

Minke whales are a small species of baleen whale

Kirstin Meyer/Getty Images

EEG tests on two young baleen whales reveal they can hear sounds at higher frequencies than previously thought, leading researchers to explore how the ocean's largest animals respond to noise from predators and humans. We are being forced to reconsider how we react.

“This is truly groundbreaking work,” he says. susan parks from Syracuse University in New York was not involved in the new study. “Directly measuring hearing in wild baleen whales is something researchers in this field have been working on for decades…To my knowledge, this is the first successful test of this method in baleen whales. is.”

However, baleen whales are the largest animals on earth, and research methods such as temporarily restraining them for hearing tests are not easy. “The body size of most baleen whales is too large for approaches to be effective,” he says. dorian howser at the National Marine Mammal Foundation, a California-based nonprofit organization. So Hauser and his colleagues focused on a relatively small baleen species called the minke whale.

Researchers investigated the migratory routes of minke whales along the Norwegian coast and discovered a natural channel between the two islands, where they used mesh fencing and boats to capture the two whales, which are about 3 to 5 meters long. The whale was guided to an enclosure at the farm. Drop down net door. The researchers then used a roller system to pull up the net, keeping the teens partially submerged in the water.

For the hearing test, the researchers were able to record brain wave signals by placing two gold-plated electrodes with silicone suction cups on each whale's skin near its blowhole and dorsal fin. They measured how the whales' brains responded to sounds played through underwater speakers for about 30 minutes in one whale and 90 minutes in the other.

These experiments revealed that whales' auditory brainstem responds to ultrasonic waves at frequencies as high as 45 to 90 kilohertz, which exceeds the ultrasonic waves that the human ear can detect. This is a much wider audible range than previously thought possible based on ear anatomy and vocalizations.

He said corralling and confining wild marine mammals is “quite controversial” because it can cause “significant stress” to the animals. Oliver Boisseau At Marine Conservation Research, a UK-based non-profit organization. But he said the discovery was “hugely important” for understanding how baleen whales evade predators such as killer whales, which use high-frequency echolocation clicks to hunt. .

Researchers should also reconsider how military sonar and commercial echo sounders used to map the ocean floor affect baleen whales, Boisseau said. “The more we study hearing in marine mammals, the more our initial assumptions seem to become confused,” he says.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

The Top 5 Crucial Experiments Conducted on the International Space Station

Beyond eating floating food and introducing curious Earthlings to vacuum toilets, the crew of the International Space Station (ISS) have some serious work to do as their time on the ISS nears its end.

Since the space station opened, astronauts have conducted more than 3,000 experiments in the microgravity and high radiation of low Earth orbit. Experiments range from making sure fertility levels remain unchanged (in mice, not in the crew) to testing the feasibility of using lunar soil to make concrete that will help build a future lunar base. Here are four of the most impressive aspects of ISS research.

Artificial retina

Millions of people suffer from a degenerative disease that affects the retina (the layer of light-sensitive cells at the back of the eye), and there is no cure, only treatments that slow its progression. But implants that mimic the function of the retina could be a solution, and US-based company Lambda Vision has successfully produced them by depositing layer after layer of a light-activated protein called bacteriorhodopsin. On Earth, solutions of bacteriorhodopsin tended to clot and deposit poorly, but much better results were achieved earlier this decade. In microgravity on the International Space Station Lambda Vision is currently seeking to scale up manufacturing of its artificial retinas in space, claiming that these are among the first technologies with potential clinical use to be evaluated on the ISS.

Invisible Flame

When you light a match, the wood burns and reacts with oxygen to produce heat, light, and other substances such as carbon…

Source: www.newscientist.com

Experiments in Basic Physics Could Uncover Hidden Dark Matter in Additional Dimensions

We don’t tend to dwell on the fact that we exist in three dimensions. Front to back, left to right, up to down – these are the axes along which we move through the world. When we try to imagine something else, we usually conjure up the most outlandish science fiction images of portals in the fabric of space-time and parallel universes.

But serious physicists have long been fascinated by the possibility of extra dimensions. Despite their intangibility, extra dimensions hold the promise of solving some big questions about the deepest workings of the universe. And just because they’re hard to imagine and even harder to observe doesn’t mean we can rule them out. “There’s no reason they have to be three-dimensional,” says David Schneider, a physics professor at the University of California, San Diego. Georges Obie At Oxford University. “It could have been two, it could have been four, it could have been ten.”

Still, there comes a time when any self-respecting physicist wants hard evidence. That’s why it’s so exciting that over the past few years, researchers have developed several techniques that may finally provide evidence of extra dimensions. For example, we might be able to detect gravity leaking into extra dimensions. We might see subtle signatures of it in black holes, or we might find its signature in particle accelerators.

But now, in an unexpected twist, Ovid and his colleagues claim that there is an extra dimension that is fundamentally different from any previously conceived. This “dark dimension” hides ancient particles whose gravity could solve the mystery of dark matter, the force that is thought to have shaped the universe. Crucially, this dimension is relatively…

Source: www.newscientist.com

Top 17 Mind-Blowing Science Experiments of the Year (To Date)

The Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF) has announced the winners of this year’s Scientific Image Competition, which celebrates the hidden beauty of scientific research.

The contest is divided into four categories: “Subjects of Research,” “Locations and Equipment,” “Women and Men Scientists,” and “Video Loops.”

The winning entries include an image of the transparent abdomen of a glass frog taken by Francesca Angiolani-Larrea, a doctoral student at the University of Bern, who won first place in the “Research Subject” category.

Check out the winners and standout images from this year’s contest.

Distinguishing between locations and instrument categories – organized chaos

This operating room image was taken before pig surgery began. The purpose of this surgery was to evaluate the in vivo performance of a new vascular graft for aortic replacement. This treatment has the potential to improve patients’ life expectancy and quality of life after intervention. Photo credit: Georgios Lovas

Distinguishing research target categories – maize root microbiome

This image visualizes the corn root microbiome (the collection of microorganisms that live in or on the roots) and how they process the plant’s secondary metabolites. Photo credit: Lisa Tennen

Winners in the Research Subject Category – In Search of a Good Father

This image shows Hyalinobtrachium valerioi, a type of glass frog with a transparent stomach. Although child rearing in the animal kingdom has traditionally been seen as the job of the mother, it takes on a more diverse form in amphibians. This species is a good example. The female’s role is to select the best mate and lay eggs. Males stay close to their children and take care of them. Sometimes they hold up to seven animals at once. Photo credit: Francesca Angiolani-Larrea

Differentiating between video loop categories – Smapshot

“Smapshot” is a crowdsourcing project that allows citizens to localize historical photos using a virtual globe. Participants can georeference the image by clicking on points that appear within the image and on the virtual globe. Georeferenced images are of interest to researchers and the general public because they help visualize phenomena such as climate change and urbanization. Video stills by Jens Ingensand

Video Loop Categories Distinction – Tumor Cells…

A still image from a video showing how tumor cells extracted from patient tissue grow within a three-dimensional matrix. Video stills by Michele Gallioni

Male and female science winners – more than just wearing lab coats

In this photo, a veterinarian is auscultating a mini pig’s heart to make sure it’s healthy. Photo credit: Mariafrancesca Petrucci

Winner of the Video Loop Category – Wingtip vortex…

This shows the flow pattern in a wind tunnel test section that occurs downstream of an aircraft arched wing located near a solid surface. In classic flight conditions, high above the ground, a single vortex develops at the wing tip. In this case, a complex spiral system is seen. Video stills by Cyprien de Sepibus

Distinguishing research subject categories – Cerebrospinal fluid…

This supercomputing simulation shows how cerebrospinal fluid flows around the optic nerve. Cerebrospinal fluid flows from the brain to the optic nerve, nourishing it and removing toxic metabolites. Photos by Diego Rossinelli, Jatta Berberat, Jill Forsti

Location and Equipment Winner – Bees and Chips

This photo shows a close-up of a robotic device inhabited by bees, developed within the Mobile Robot Systems Group at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Lausanne (EPFL). Trials were being carried out in Austria in collaboration with biologists from the University of Graz as part of the EU-funded Hiveopolis project. Photo credit: Raphael Balmak

Scientists Women and Men by Category – Wheat Harvest

Hundreds of research wheat fields must be threshed to study crop growth using sensors and high-tech equipment. This includes manual labor such as bagging and collecting seed samples for drying and further processing. Photo credit: Andreas Hund

Distinguishing between locations and equipment categories – UV reactors…

The photo shows the UV reactor used for photopolymerization. Photopolymerization is a process in which light induces the chemical assembly of short monomer molecules to form long polymer chains. The reactor is built with a 5-meter strip containing 300 LEDs wrapped inside an aluminum cylinder. Photo credit: Deborah Toney

Distinguishing women from men in science – the big stakes in the history of medicine

This photo was taken at the historic library and museum of the Saint-Louis Hospital in Paris, France. It has a collection of books on the history of medicine and dermatology, many of which are out of print and extremely rare. Photo by Alexandre Wenger and Radu Suciu

Video loop category differentiation – tumor growth simulation

This computer simulation shows how a malignant tumor grows from a single cell to a million cells. Each cell is colored according to its relative age, from red (young) to blue (old). Video stills by Roman Vetter

Classification of research subject categories – My voice in the video…

My Voice in Images is a photo-based participatory research method that gives children and young people the opportunity to express their views on social issues and public policies that interest them. The children who created this photo emphasized the need for a solid roof over their heads. Photo by Sylvia Garcia Delahaye and Lavinia Johnson.

Distinguishing between locations and instrument categories – Wandering eye

An ophthalmic microsurgeon practices surgical techniques for artificial eyes. The development of educational materials aims to create realistic conditions for surgical training workshops before it is possible to safely operate on live patients. Photo credit: Julien Boussette

Distinguishing research object categories – thin layer chromatography plates…

Thin layer chromatography plates in fluorescent dye synthesis. Chromatography is a technique for spatially separating the components of a mixture. This example image was generated during the purification of a complex fluorochrome, or fluorescent compound. Photo credit: Salome Puntenar

read more:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Fusion experiments successfully navigate major operational barriers

Inside the DIII-D tokamak fusion reactor

Ruth Wilcox (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Fusion reactions have overcome two important barriers to operating in the “sweet spot” needed for optimal power production: increasing plasma density and keeping a denser plasma confined. This milestone marks another stepping stone toward fusion power, although commercial reactors are likely still years away.

One of the main avenues being considered in efforts to achieve fusion power generation is the use of tokamak reactors. These have donut-shaped chambers in which plasma, hotter than the surface of the sun, is trapped by giant magnets.

It was thought that there was a point known as the Greenwald limit, beyond which the plasma could not become denser without escaping the influence of the magnets, potentially damaging the reactor. However, experiments have shown that the power of a tokamak reactor increases proportionally to the square of the fuel density, so increasing the density is important to increase the power.

now, Siye Din General Atomics in San Diego, California, and colleagues have shown that there is a way to increase plasma density and have shown that plasma density can be stabilized. DIII-D National Fusion Facility The tokamak reactor was operated for 2.2 seconds at an average density 20 percent above the Greenwald limit. This barrier has been crossed before with low stability and short duration, but this experiment was importantly also performed with a metric greater than 1, known as H98(y,2).

H98(y,2) states that it is a complex combination of measurements and values ​​that indicate how well the plasma is confined in the magnet. gianluca sarri At Queen's University Belfast, a value of 1.0 or higher indicates normal plasma retention.

“He's starting to show some sort of stable behavior where he can consistently be in the sweet spot,” Sarri says. “This was done on a small machine. If we extrapolate these results to a larger machine…we would expect to find a situation where we can achieve gains and significant power production over a significant period of time.”

Sarri said the DIII-D experiment relied on a combination of approaches that are not new in themselves, but that their combination appears to have produced a promising approach. The researchers increased the power by increasing the density in the center of the donut-shaped plasma, while allowing the plasma to sink at the end closest to the containment vessel, avoid plasma leakage. They also injected deuterium gas into the plasma to calm the reaction in certain areas.

DIII-D's plasma chamber has an outer radius of just 1.6 meters, but it remains to be seen whether the same method will work for ITER, the next generation tokamak being built in France. ITER has a radius of 6.2 meters and is expected to be completed. It is planned to generate plasma by 2025 at the earliest.

“These plasmas are very complex,” Sarri says. “Small changes in circumstances lead to large changes in behavior. Experimentally, it was a trial-and-error kind of approach, trying out many different configurations and basically seeing which one worked best. It was all about It's about forcing the plasma to do something that is completely against its nature and that it doesn&#39t actually want to do.”

Ding says the experiment bodes well for the future of fusion power generation. “Many reactor designs require high confinement and high density at the same time. Experimentally, this is the first time this has been achieved,” he says. “Next steps will be costly and research is currently moving in many directions. We hope this document will help focus efforts around the world.”

Sarri says this work is another step toward a practical fusion power plant, but no one should expect a commercial reactor to be completed within the next five or even 10 years.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Discovering fresh approaches to tackling pollution with fascinating experiments

Purple-B project

Luigi Avantaggiato 2024

These interesting experiments Green Promotion Institute A public research center in Venice, Italy that explores new ways to restore the environment and generate energy. The lab's unusual combination of scientists, engineers, and psychologists create prototypes that harness natural organisms to do useful work, often taking on a sculptural aspect as a side effect that fascinates the resident artist.

“Despite being the object of science, it has beauty,” says photographer Luigi Avantaggiato. He spent time cataloging a device that uses bacteria called Purple-B (pictured above). Rhodopsdomonas palustris, commonly found in Venice's lagoons, converts human waste into useful hydrogen. The experiment is being funded by the European Space Agency because it could provide a way to process astronaut waste in orbit to create usable fuel, but could also be used on Earth's surface. There is a possibility that it can be done.

Main laboratory of Veritas Group's Green Promotion Institute

Luigi Avantaggiato 2024

The bright green contents of several tanks in the lab (pictured above) are known as liquid forests, which in this project are home to tiny algae such as: chlorella, to capture the carbon dioxide that is warming the planet. Each tank contains 250 liters and can accommodate approximately 1 billion algae per cubic centimeter.

A researcher working in one of GPLabs' laboratories.

Luigi Avantaggiato 2024

Another shot (pictured above) shows the geodesic dome, where environmental engineers at a startup called 9-Tech are working on a new way to recover silicon from used solar panels.

The entire lab site was created by veritashandles waste and water supplies for Venice and Treviso's approximately 1 million residents and 50 million tourists.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Health and Biology Experiments Conducted by ISS Crew during Dragon’s Countdown

Loral O’Hara, NASA astronaut and Expedition 70 aeronautical engineer, proudly displays the research hardware that supports the UMAMI (Understanding Microgravity for Animal-Microbial Interactions) astrobiology experiment. Dr. O’Hara has in her possession an Advanced Space Experiment Processor (ADSEP) fluid processing cassette (FPC) that facilitates observations of the effects of spaceflight on the molecular and chemical interactions between beneficial microorganisms and their animal hosts. Credit goes to NASA for this image.

The top research goals for the Expedition 70 crew earlier in the week included crew health and astrobiology. The crew members of the International Space Station (ISS) were occupied with various standard laboratory maintenance tasks. In the meantime, SpaceX’s Dragon cargo spacecraft is scheduled to depart as early as Wednesday.

Studying the effects of weightlessness is a priority for doctors and scientists, as they observe how various life forms, including humans, adapt and survive in the harsh environment of microgravity. NASA and its international partners are planning further long-term missions into space in order to learn more about the biology of aging and its impact on disease mechanisms. NASA astronaut and Expedition 70 flight engineer Jasmine Moghbeli was seen wearing a BioMonitor vest and headband to test her ability to comfortably monitor the health of astronauts throughout the day. She also spent time processing cell samples in the Kibo experimental module’s life science glovebox.

Today, a pair of CubeSats were deployed outside the orbital outpost for exploration. Flight engineer Satoshi Furukawa of the Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JAXA) photographed the deployment of two small satellites and then maintained and supported optical hardware regenerative medicine experiment. In the end, Furukawa prepared: Sapphire-VI Fire safety experiments conducted remotely on board a ship Cygnus space cargo ship After leaving the space station.

Astronauts Loral O’Hara and Andreas Mogensen were stowing their spacewalk gear in Quest’s airlock. ESA (European Space Agency) astronaut and Expedition 70 Commander Andreas Mogensen used the Advanced Space Experiment Processor 2 (ADSEP-2) to store and process samples for a variety of biological and physical science experiments.

Cosmonauts Oleg Kononenko and Konstantin Borisov inspected and photographed eggs packed inside a centrifuge in the Nauka scientific module. Flight engineer Nikolai Chubut spent the day developing the life support systems inside the Zarya and Zvezda modules.

The Dragon supply mission’s departure was targeted for 5:05 p.m. EST Wednesday, Dec. 20, with coverage beginning at 4:45 p.m. on the NASA+ streaming service and NASA Television. As the departure was being organized, joint teams continued to work to assess optimal autonomous ports of entry and return weather conditions.

Source: scitechdaily.com