Judge Challenges Apple, Orders It to Ease Control Over the App Store

A federal judge ruled on Wednesday that Apple must ease its control over the App Store and cease collecting fees for app sales. This decision wraps up a five-year antitrust lawsuit initiated by Epic Games, aimed at redefining Apple’s substantial influence within the digital economy.

Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California criticized Apple for trying to obstruct the previous court ruling and indicated that the company should refrain from appealing further. She specifically condemned Apple CEO Tim Cook and other executives for providing false testimony.

In a prior ruling, Judge Gonzalez Rogers instructed Apple to allow apps to process payments directly, enabling them to provide external links to users and circumvent the 30% fee levied by Apple, potentially resulting in lower costs for consumers.

However, on Wednesday, Judge Gonzalez Rogers asserted that Apple had established a new framework that would mandate external sales apps to pay a 27% commission to the company. Apple also implemented a pop-up notification that warned customers against making payments outside the App Store, suggesting that such transactions might be insecure.

“Apple has attempted to protect billions in revenue by directly opposing this court’s injunction,” Judge Gonzalez Rogers stated.

In response, she indicated that Apple would no longer be able to collect commissions from transactions made outside of the App Store. She also mentioned that she could impose restrictions on developers from creating buttons or links for payments outside the store, and could not issue warnings that deter users from making purchases. Furthermore, Judge Gonzalez Rogers urged federal attorneys to investigate possible criminal actions within the Northern District of California.

This ruling marks a significant shift in the app economy, potentially decreasing costs for Apple while increasing earnings for developers. The App Store, a core element of Apple’s business model, remains a primary venue for downloading mobile games and various applications.

“This opens up opportunities for developers to negotiate better deals, resulting in advantages for consumers as well,” stated Epic CEO Tim Sweeney. “Today is a momentous occasion for everyone involved.”

Apple may contest the ruling. The company has not yet commented, and its stock fell by 1.5% in after-hours trading.

Epic, the developer of Fortnite, filed an antitrust lawsuit against Apple in 2020. Apple was accused of coercing app developers into using its payment system for App Store access, which is the sole channel for distributing apps on iPhones. This policy enabled Apple to garner as much as 30% from numerous transactions.

The App Store contributes significantly to Apple’s annual service revenue, which is nearly $100 billion.

In a ruling two years later, Judge Gonzalez Rogers stopped short of declaring Apple a monopoly in the mobile gaming sector, thus protecting the company from the most severe consequences of the lawsuit. However, she did find that Apple violated California’s unfair competition laws by hindering developers from providing users with alternative payment methods.

Last year, Epic contended that Apple was not adhering to the ruling due to the implementation of new fees and regulations for developers. The judge mandated that Apple submit documentation clarifying the reasoning behind its revised system.

Internal documents from Apple revealed attempts to obstruct alternative payment options while preserving as many of the traditional 30% fees as possible. During a meeting in July 2023, Phil Schiller, who managed the App Store, asserted that Apple would not charge commission, while Apple’s finance chief, Luca Maestri, defended the newly established 27% fee. Reports indicated that Cook supported Maestri’s position.

Cook also instructed that a “fear” notification be displayed, stating that “Apple privacy and security standards do not apply to purchases made via the web” when a user clicks an external payment link.

“Apple clearly understood its actions and consistently chose the most anti-competitive options,” Judge Gonzalez Rogers remarked.

She accused Apple executives of “lying under oath,” further asserting that “Cook made misguided choices.”

Source: www.nytimes.com

Warning from ThinkTank: UK must ease AI regulations or face strain on transatlantic relations

According to Tony Blair’s ThinkTank, the UK should consider relaxing copyright laws to allow artificial intelligence companies to create innovative products.

The Tony Blair Institute, with ties to the US, is set to introduce copyright measures that could lead to tariffs on UK goods. Despite geopolitical concerns, TBI states that caution is necessary.

The ThinkTank warns that requiring licenses for UK content used in AI models may drive development to regions with less stringent copyright laws. Implementing strict licensing models could also involve restricting access to models trained with such content, including US-owned AI systems.

In a newly released report, TBI expresses support for the government’s proposal to allow AI companies to train models with copyrighted materials, unless creatives choose to opt out. TBI suggests that overly strict AI regulations, as suggested by the Trump administration, could hinder economic and national security interests in the AI race.

The report emphasizes the need for collaboration between rights holders, policymakers, and AI developers to balance creativity and innovation in the AI space.

A more stringent copyright approach than that of the EU, Singapore, or Japan could drive AI developers away from the UK, according to TBI.

The report also advocates for the establishment of an AI and creative industries center to foster collaboration between technology and creative sectors.

Beeban Kidron, a vocal opponent of the government’s AI proposal, criticizes the notion that the UK should become an AI hub for Silicon Valley, calling it a bleak vision for Britain.

Kidron raises concerns about potential conflict of interest due to TBI receiving donations from US tech billionaire Larry Ellison. TBI asserts its intellectual independence over policy work despite the funding.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Trump to Ease Tariffs on China in Exchange for TikTok Deal

Donald Trump has expressed his willingness to reduce tariffs on Chinese trade in exchange for the sale of Tiktok, a social media app used by 170 million Americans, by its Chinese parent company.

He acknowledged China’s involvement in any agreement, stating, “China will have to play a role in it, perhaps giving approval, I believe they will.” Trump mentioned the possibility of offering China a concession to facilitate the deal.

Trump’s remarks indicate that the sale of Tiktok is a priority for his administration and that tariffs are being used as a negotiation tool with Beijing.

Tiktok did not provide an immediate response to the situation.

Bytedance, the parent company of Tiktok, faces an April 5 deadline to find non-Chinese buyers for the app or risk a US ban on national security grounds that was established in January under the 2024 law.

Washington’s concerns about Chinese ownership of Tiktok have led to the current situation, with fears that Beijing could exploit the app for malicious purposes and gather data on Americans.

Recently, Trump imposed an additional 20% tariff on all imports from China, demonstrating his administration’s firm stance on trade negotiations.

Securing a deal without Chinese control has been a key focus in finalizing the Tiktok transaction, with tariffs used as leverage in negotiations with Beijing.

In his earlier statements, Trump had warned China that failure to approve US deals with Tiktok could result in further tariffs being imposed.

Vice President JD Vance anticipates that the terms of the agreement regarding Tiktok ownership will be settled by April 5th.

Reports indicate that a White House-led meeting between investors is working towards securing US business interests for video apps, involving major Chinese stakeholders.

The fate of Tiktok, a widely-used app in the US, has been uncertain since the bipartisan decision to sell it by January 19th.

After initial turbulence in January, the app was temporarily banned but resumed operations shortly after Trump’s term began. He subsequently extended the deadline for the sale until April 5th and hinted at the possibility of further extensions.

The intense involvement of the White House in these trade discussions is unprecedented, resembling the role of an investment bank.

Critics argue that the ban on Tiktok infringes on Americans’ freedom of speech by restricting access to foreign media, potentially violating the First Amendment of the US Constitution.

Source: www.theguardian.com

‘Ease of Pregnancy for Young Women in the Age of Smartphone Fertility Apps’

A controversial app aimed at empowering women to manage their sex lives by predicting fertile days is being criticized for making inaccurate claims that could lead to unintended pregnancies.

Many women in the UK, including 69% of 18-24 year olds, use smartphone apps to track their menstrual cycles and identify their most fertile and least fertile days. However, experts caution that the data used by these apps to make predictions is often unreliable and limited.

Despite these concerns, one app, called the Period & Fertility Tracker, falsely promotes itself as a reliable method of contraception. Another app, Cycles, claims to accurately predict pregnancy chances daily but offers a disclaimer on its website stating it is for informational purposes only.

While some apps offer features to manage fertility goals and check chances of pregnancy each day, their effectiveness is doubted by experts. The increasing use of “natural contraception” methods raises further concerns, as studies show a rise in unintended pregnancies among users of these apps.

The accuracy of these apps in predicting fertile windows is also questioned, as they rely on traditional methods that have a high risk of error. Despite some apps requiring daily data entry for improved accuracy, the overall effectiveness of these methods remains low.

Regulators are urged to address the potential dangers posed by unregulated apps that claim to be contraceptives. While only one app is authorized to be sold as a contraceptive in some countries, the overall lack of regulation raises concerns about the safety and accuracy of these apps.

In conclusion, the growing trend of relying on period tracking apps for contraception raises serious issues about women’s health and the need for more reliable contraceptive methods.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Illegal Wildlife Trade: The Surprising Ease of Doing Business on Social Media

WWhen the baby parrots were delivered to Alice Soares de Oliveira’s desk, they had no wings and could barely open their eyes. The pair, housed in a dirty cardboard box, were just a month old and showed signs of not feeding well.

The parrot, along with two young toucans who arrived just under a month later, were victims of wildlife traffickers. They were all put up for sale on social media, probably snatched from their mother’s nest by poachers.

They were taken to Soares de Oliveira, a veterinarian. CeMaCAS, Wildlife Conservation Center in a forest on the outskirts of Brazil’s largest city, São Paulo, after being rescued by police surveillance networks on platforms such as Facebook and WhatsApp.




Illegal advertising of snakes for sale online in Brazil. Photo: Provided by RENCTAS

Social media has become an important tool for wildlife traffickers, experts say. For example, more people are using Facebook to promote the sale of endangered animals and their byproducts, often switching to messaging apps like WhatsApp to complete the sale.

Report published in October The Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime flagged 477 advertisements for 18 protected animals in Brazil and South Africa alone in three months this year. 78% of this was on social media.




The illegally traded parrot arrives at the CeMaCAS conservation center in poor condition after being rescued by the police. Photo: undefined/provided by CeMaCAS

Simone Haytham, director of environmental crime at the Global Initiative, said traders moved online after authorities cracked down on street markets. “The online space now provides a means for many of the world’s most endangered and most highly protected species to find consumers,” she says. “There’s a huge treasure trove of endangered species available for purchase online, but it’s no easy feat.”

Crawford Allan, vice president of nature crime at the World Wildlife Fund, said the pandemic has “systemized” wildlife crime online. “A lot of the public markets were closing down,” he says. “People couldn’t move, a lot of things went online, and it became the norm.”

Laws regarding the sale of wild animals vary by jurisdiction and species, so social media companies face a difficult situation in determining whether such ads are illegal. Nevertheless, experts say tech companies need to do more to determine when posts are risky.

Global Initiative combines AI technology and human analysis to detect suspicious ads online. The company’s reporting system, part of a project called Eco-Solve, covers Brazil, South Africa and Thailand, and will soon be expanded to India, Indonesia and the UAE.

Richard Scobie, executive director of TRAFFIC, an organization focused on wildlife trafficking, said advertising on social media allows sellers to “circumvent” the law and sell goods without telling buyers where they come from. He says it happens often.

“Companies need to allocate far more resources to regulating how users illegally trade wildlife parts and derivatives on their platforms,” ​​he says. “Social media companies are working to combat illegal transactions on their platforms…but there is much more they can do.”

Some tech companies are taking steps to combat this problem. In 2020, Facebook introduced tags for some search terms to warn users of the dangers of wildlife trafficking, and meta was removed. 7.6 million posts in 2023according to the Coalition Against Online Wildlife Trafficking.

The coalition is a voluntary association that includes most of the major social media companies in the United States and China.

It announced that in 2021, 11.6 million posts were blocked or deleted by members.




Parrots illegally traded after being recovered at CeMaCAS. Photo: undefined/provided by CeMaCAS

WWF’s Alan was a founding member of the federation and continues to oversee its activities. He said tech companies have been receptive to activists’ attempts to clamp down on their activities, but job cuts in the industry are hurting progress.

“As a conservation organization, we always feel that people need to do more, but we also understand that they are dealing with terrorism, child safety and all the evil in the world that flows through social media channels. They have bigger and scarier problems to deal with,” he added.

“I feel that some companies have found a balance. Others haven’t. They’re not working hard enough or they’re inactive for some reason, so they step up and do more. You need to make an effort.”

A spokesperson for Meta, which owns Facebook and WhatsApp, said: “We do not allow activities related to the purchase, sale, lottery, gifting, transfer or trading of endangered or protected species on our services.

“We use a combination of technology, team reviews, and user reports to identify behavior that violates our Terms of Service and respond to valid requests from law enforcement.”


Wildlife trafficking threatens biodiversity and can lead to the extinction of certain species. According to 2023 Forensic Science International articlesapproximately 5,209 animal species are endangered or nearly endangered due to “use and trade.”




Illegal online advertising of macaws for sale in Brazil. Photo: Undefined/Courtesy of RENCTAS

Mr Haytham said: [being advertised for sale online] It is protected as it is on the verge of extinction. They are protected because trade poses a major threat to their survival. ”

Soares de Oliveira of São Paulo believes the birds in his care have a bright future. Veterinarians at CeMaCAS care for hundreds of birds and animals at a time. She is confident that the parrot and toucan will make a full recovery and be released back into the wild.

“They are in the middle of rehabilitation. They are still young so we are monitoring them, but I think they will be able to live a free life in three months,” she says.

Find more coverage of extinction ages here and follow biodiversity reporters Phoebe Weston and Patrick Greenfield on the Guardian app for more nature coverage.

Source: www.theguardian.com