Irish Authorities Request Microsoft to Investigate Alleged Illegal Data Processing by IDF

Irish officials have received a formal request to look into Microsoft regarding claims of unlawful data processing by the Israel Defense Forces.

The Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL), a human rights organization, filed the complaint with the Data Protection Commissioner, who is legally charged with overseeing all data processing activities within the European Union.

This comes after reports in August from the Guardian, along with Israeli-Palestinian publication +972 Magazine and Hebrew media Local Call, highlighted that substantial amounts of Palestinian phone communications were stored on Microsoft’s Azure cloud platform as part of an extensive surveillance initiative by the Israeli military.

The ICCL asserts that the handling of personal data “aided in the commission of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide by Israeli forces.” Microsoft’s European headquarters are located in Ireland.

“Microsoft’s technologies are endangering millions of Palestinians. These are not just theoretical data protection issues,” said Joe O’Brien, executive director of ICCL.

He remarked that cloud services “enable tangible violence” and emphasized the need for the “DPC to respond swiftly and decisively” given the “risk to life involved in the matter at hand.”

He further stated, “When European infrastructure is used to facilitate surveillance and targeting, the Irish Data Protection Commissioner must step in and utilize its full authority to hold Microsoft accountable.”

A collection of leaked documents reviewed by the Guardian has indicated that as early as 2021, the Israeli military’s intelligence unit, Unit 8200, started discussions to transfer large amounts of classified intelligence data to a cloud service operated by a US company.

The documents revealed that Microsoft’s storage facilities were employed by Unit 8200 to archive extensive records of Palestinian daily communications, which facilitated specific airstrikes and other military actions.

Following this revelation, Microsoft initiated an urgent external inquiry into its connections with Unit 8200. Preliminary findings led the company to suspend this unit’s access to certain cloud storage and AI services.

ICCL contends that Microsoft played a crucial role in enabling Israel’s military surveillance system known as “Al-Minasek.”

The organization claims that records of intercepted conversations between EU servers and Israel were reportedly “deleted,” obstructing evidence of unlawful processing before an EU inquiry could commence, violating the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) that regulates personal data usage.

With Azure’s vast storage and computational capabilities, Unit 8200 was establishing an indiscriminate system allowing agents to collect, replay, and analyze cell phone calls from entire populations.

A spokesperson for the DPC stated, “We can confirm that the DPC has received the complaint and is currently evaluating it.”

Microsoft has been approached for a response.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Meta Found in Violation of EU Law Due to ‘Ineffective’ Illegal Content Complaint System

The European Commission has stated that Instagram and Facebook failed to comply with EU regulations by not offering users a straightforward method to report illegal content, such as child sexual abuse and terrorism.

According to the EU enforcement agency’s initial findings released on Friday, Meta, the California-based company valued at $1.8 trillion (approximately £1.4 trillion) that operates both platforms, has implemented unnecessary hurdles for users attempting to submit reports.

The report indicated that both platforms employ misleading designs, referred to as “dark patterns,” in their reporting features, which can lead to confusion and discourage users from taking action.

The commission concluded that this behavior constitutes a violation of the company’s obligations under the EU-wide Digital Services Act (DSA), suggesting that “Meta’s systems for reporting and addressing illegal content may not be effective.” Meta has denied any wrongdoing.

The commission remarked, “In the case of Meta, neither Facebook nor Instagram seems to provide user-friendly and easily accessible ‘notification and action’ systems for users to report illegal content like child sexual abuse or terrorist content.”

A senior EU official emphasized that the matter goes beyond illegal content, touching on issues of free speech and “overmoderation.” Facebook has previously faced accusations of “shadowbanning” users regarding sensitive topics such as Palestine.

The existing reporting system is deemed not only ineffective but also “too complex for users to navigate,” ultimately discouraging them from reaching out, the official noted.

Advocates continue to raise concerns about inherent safety issues in some of Meta’s offerings. Recent research released by Meta whistleblower Arturo Bejar revealed that newly introduced safety features on Instagram are largely ineffective and pose a risk to children under 13.

Meta has refuted the report’s implications, asserting that parents have powerful tools at their disposal. The company implemented mandatory Instagram accounts for teenagers as of September 2024 and recently announced plans to adopt a version of its PG-13 film rating system to enhance parental control over their teens’ social media engagement.

The commission also pointed out that Meta complicates matters for users whose content has been blocked or accounts suspended. The report indicated that the appeal mechanism does not allow users to present explanations or evidence in support of their case, which undermines its efficacy.

The commission stated that streamlining the feedback system could also assist platforms in combating misinformation, citing examples like: an Irish deepfake video. Leading presidential candidate Catherine Connolly has claimed she will withdraw from Friday’s election.

This ongoing investigation has been conducted in partnership with Coimisiún na Meán, Ireland’s Digital Services Coordinator, which oversees platform regulations from its EU headquarters in Dublin.

The commission also made preliminary findings indicating that TikTok and Meta are not fulfilling their obligation to provide researchers with adequate access to public data necessary for examining the extent of minors’ exposure to illegal or harmful content. Researchers often encounter incomplete or unreliable data.

The commission emphasized that “granting researchers access to platform data is a crucial transparency obligation under the DSA, as it allows for public oversight regarding the potential effects these platforms have on our physical and mental well-being.”

These initial findings will allow the platforms time to address the commission’s requests. Non-compliance may result in fines of up to 6% of their global annual revenue, along with periodic penalties imposed to ensure adherence.

Skip past newsletter promotions

“Our democracy relies on trust, which means platforms must empower their users, respect their rights, and allow for system oversight,” stated Hena Virkunen, executive vice-chair of the commission for technology sovereignty, security, and democracy.

“The DSA has made this a requirement rather than a choice. With today’s action, we are sharing preliminary findings on data access by researchers regarding four platforms. We affirm that platforms are accountable for their services to users and society, as mandated by EU law.”


A spokesperson for Meta stated: “We disagree with any suggestions that we have violated the DSA and are actively engaging with the European Commission on these matters. Since the DSA was implemented, we have made changes to reporting options, appeal processes, and data access tools in the EU, and we are confident that these measures meet EU legal requirements.”

TikTok mentioned that fully sharing data about its platform with researchers is challenging due to restrictions imposed by GDPR data protection regulations.

“TikTok values transparency and appreciates the contributions of researchers to our platform and the industry at large,” a spokesperson elaborated. “We have invested significantly in data sharing, and presently, nearly 1,000 research teams have accessed their data through our research tools.

“While we assess the European Commission’s findings, we observe a direct conflict between DSA requirements and GDPR data protection standards.” The company has urged regulators to “clarify how these obligations should be reconciled.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

California State Police Confounded by Tickets Issued to Driverless Cars for Illegal U-Turns

If a vehicle makes an unlawful U-turn without a driver in the seat, will it still incur a fine? This intriguing question was recently tackled by the California police department.

While conducting DUI enforcement, San Bruno officials encountered a self-driving car that performed an illegal U-turn, yet had no one behind the wheel. In a post from the San Bruno Police Station on Saturday, it was noted that police redirected traffic after halting the identifiable white vehicle from Waymo, the leading autonomous car service in the San Francisco Bay Area.

“We couldn’t issue citations as there was no human operator (our guidelines do not cover ‘robots’).” The post stated.

The department alerted Waymo about the incident, expressing hope that future programming updates will help avoid similar violations.

In a response, Waymo affirmed that its autonomous system, referred to as Waymo drivers, is “engineered to adhere to traffic laws.”

“We are evaluating this incident and remain dedicated to enhancing road safety through continuous learning and experience,” the statement sent to the Guardian read.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Last year, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed legislation allowing police to issue a “Notice of Violation” if an unmanned vehicle breaks traffic laws. This law will be effective starting July 2026, and it mandates businesses to install emergency communication lines for first responders.

The bill, proposed by San Francisco council member Phil Ting, came in response to multiple incidents within the city that could obstruct traffic, endanger pedestrians, and interfere with emergency responses.

The new law empowers first responders to direct companies to relocate self-driving cars away from an area, requiring them to respond within two minutes.

Addressing concerns regarding leniency from officers, San Bruno police reaffirmed that “there is a statute allowing officers to issue notifications to companies.”

Initially launched as a project under Google’s X Research Lab in 2009, Waymo Cars operate using a combination of external cameras and sensors. The company has encountered its share of challenges in the past, having to recall over 1,200 vehicles earlier this year due to software glitches leading to collisions with barriers and other stationary objects. The National Highway Traffic Safety Bureau has also initiated an investigation last year after receiving reports of 22 incidents involving Waymo vehicles acting erratically or breaching traffic safety laws.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Militsioner: Is Bribing a Big Cop with Apples Actually Illegal? | Games

p
Running offers a thrilling aspect of immersive Sims. Games like Thief and Strange immerse players in a dynamic world filled with navigable emails and notes.

One could argue that the essence of this genre is embodied by every character you’ve longed for, monstrous figures towering hundreds of feet above while watching your every move. Fortunately, the latest release from Russian developers Tallboys addresses this gap. In Militsioner, you’re apprehended for an ambiguous offense and must escape the city swiftly. Will you cover the getaway on the Railway? Or perhaps shatter a window for distraction? These are classic tactics in immersive sims. Unfortunately, a policeman stands in your way. Even seated serenely, he looms as a melancholic yet vigilant giant over the ravaged urban sprawl.




“A new dimension to storytelling”…Miritty Honor. Photo: Tallboys Game

This formidable figure embodies a military presence. He could either be a target to undermine or a distraction, radiating a visual glow that clearly sets this game apart as a unique immersive journey. Director and game designer Dmitry Shevchenko of Tallboys reveals that the project took shape six months before the police made their entrance.

“I remember an interview regarding the development of Thief: The Dark Project,” shares Shevchenko. “We were captivated by the concept of granting players a definitive role or profession, which resonated with our vision. Around the same time, we also considered giants as a central theme.”

These concepts coalesced when Shevchenko recalled a digital artwork by Russian artist Andrei Snov depicting a colossal traffic cop outdoors. “It resonated perfectly,” Shevchenko laughs. “The image encapsulated the player’s role and their antagonists quite well: the criminals and the police.”




Cruel dystopia…Mirity Honor Photo: Tallboys Game

Following that revelation, the portrayal of other militarized characters fell into place swiftly. The game delves into a harsh, totalitarian landscape that engages with a relentless systemic control over individuals. Yet it also weaves in a more personal and intimate narrative strand. Is it unlawful to offer apples as bribes to towering police officers? Is attempting to pursue a romantic interest considered illegal?

To differentiate elements, Militsioner employs a unique system to track the internal worlds of non-player characters. “We are adhering to classic immersive Sim mechanics, where players can engage through dialogue, stealth, or combat,” explains Shevchenko, suggesting that emotional states will introduce an additional layer inspired by The Sims. “The emotional state of a character will be crucial to the gameplay,” he emphasizes.

For instance, you may trigger panic if you sneak into someone’s home and are discovered. This will alter your dialogue options and interactions. “Such an approach creates an intricately interconnected web of reactions, enhancing problem-solving and narrative depth,” asserts Shevchenko.

This complex system is augmented by rigorous player testing. During this phase, the Tallboys team investigates player actions and their choices. The notion of dating police officers emerged from this feedback. “Players expressed interest in exploring that relational dynamic,” says Shevchenko.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Milichoiner, developed by a Russian team reflecting on the Ukrainian invasion, is profoundly political and subtly literary. Shevchenko cites influences from Kafka, along with notable figures like the Strugatsky Brothers, famed for their dystopian tales in “Roadside Picnic.” “I continuously strive to evoke the emotions present in their works,” says Shevchenko. “Their ability to depict abstract settings and character sketches, particularly the surreal images of society and its systems, is what I admire.”

Additionally, echoes of Nikolai Gogol can be felt in the narrative, exploring power structures through imaginative and extraordinary gameplay. His anti-heroes navigate a world populated by gigantic police officers, including a man whose nose aspires to a higher social rank, and another who seeks riches by exploiting deceased serfs.

Militsioner is in development for PC, with a release date yet to be announced.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Inside the Cub Breeding Farm on TikTok and Instagram: The Challenges of Illegal Wildlife Trade

Champagne glasses clink at a bustling party in Bangkok, where elegantly dressed guests share laughter and mingle. They take turns posing with a cat, casually shifting it from one person to another. But as the camera focuses, it becomes evident that this is no ordinary pet; it’s a cub resembling a lion. A woman in a striking red cocktail dress playfully lifts the cub to her face for a kiss, all while the camera clicks.

Such clips flood social media platforms like Instagram and TikTok, providing insight into Thailand’s rapidly growing lion trading industry. According to recent reports from The Wildlife Friends Foundation Thailand and the Oxford Wildlife Trade Research Group, the number of lions in captivity has more than tripled since 2018. A network of lion farms has emerged to cater to this rising demand, often managed by individuals lacking proper wildlife care experience.

Lion breeder Patama Wadee Champituck greets visitors in her nursery, where the scent of kitten formula fills the air.

“When we began, we had little experience,” she admits, noting that she has sold over 80 lions across Thailand.

The buyers include both Thai nationals and foreigners, all of whom are affluent. Prices for Thai lion cubs start at $5,000 (£3,700), with rare white cubs fetching as much as $15,000. Owning a lion comes with hefty expenses, including the need for a secure enclosure and as much as 10kg of fresh meat daily.

Most buyers desire the youngest lions possible. Although some customers purchase directly from the farm, others work with agents promoting the cubs on social media.

As these animals grow, complications frequently arise. “Some buyers can’t handle their lions,” says Patamawadi. “They often ask us to take them back.”

The report reveals that this “buyback” system forms the basis of the farm’s business model, allowing owners to experience lion ownership without a long-term commitment. Older lions can be used for breeding or sold to zoos, generating profit at each life stage.

Frequent transfers between facilities hinder the tracking of individual lions, which contributes to discrepancies between official data and actual numbers. The report identifies at least 444 captured lions, with 138 registered since 2018 with the Department of Thai National Parks, Wildlife, and Plant Conservation. Researchers believe true numbers may be significantly higher due to a lack of registered sales or breeding activities.

Despite regulatory efforts, numerous loopholes persist, enabling the trade to thrive. In 2019, the government enacted the Wildlife Conservation Act, regulating ownership of non-native, CITES-listed species like lions that were previously broadly protected. Unfortunately, this legislation inadvertently fueled lion trading by creating legal avenues with significant surveillance gaps. Owning a lion requires a license; however, breeding does not have the same restrictions. Anyone legally owning a lion can breed it, and cubs only need registration once they are 60 days old, with hybrid species, such as ligers, entirely excluded from the law. Consequently, this industry, valued at over $1 million (£740,000) annually, continues to flourish.

Taweesak Anansiriwattana, a Bangkok veterinarian known as Dr. Vee, operates in a clinic on the city’s outskirts. “I do not endorse keeping lions as pets,” he states. Over the past five years, he has dealt with over 25 privately owned lions. “Our humid climate leads to common skin infections,” he adds, noting malnutrition is prevalent since many owners feed their lions only chicken when they require organ meats like liver and intestines to thrive. Enclosure requirements mandate a minimum of 3m x 3m, but Dr. Vee found that less than half of the households he visited met these criteria.

  • Adult animals including rare white lions and cubs from breeding farms. Photo: Anna Norman Belmdez

“There are significant welfare issues affecting these animals,” states Tom Taylor, Operations Chief of Wildlife Friends Foundation Thailand, who co-authored the report. “Many facilities provide miserable conditions, keeping lions in dark, barren enclosures, with inadequate diets.” To satisfy demand, breeders frequently separate cubs from their mothers early, prompting rapid return to breeding cycles. Inbreeding is especially prevalent among white lions and hybrids, increasing their perceived value.

Lions not indigenous to Thailand are classified as vulnerable by the IUCN. While the captive population offers little conservation benefit, Taylor warns that it opens pathways for human trafficking and elevates risks to wild lion populations. “We have credible reports indicating that Thai lions are being illegally exported, both alive and for their body parts,” he noted, explaining that these lions may be filling the market gap created by restrictions on the tiger trade.

Public safety also emerges as a critical concern, evidenced by reports of lions escaping from private enclosures and entering public areas. In 2024, a viral video featured a man driving a lion in a convertible car, triggering widespread alarm. In response, the National Parks Director announced that the government is contemplating amendments to existing laws, including tighter regulations around lion ownership.


The report advocates for emergency bans on individual ownership and commercial breeding, increased licensing requirements, and restrictions on lion cafes and photo ops. These practices are believed to elevate the allure of exotic pets. “Many individuals are attracted to owning a lion without fully grasping the ethical, financial, and safety repercussions,” states Taylor. He points out that similar trends are emerging for other non-native species, such as ring-tailed lemurs and red pandas. “We hope this report encourages the public to consider the origins of these animals, their rearing conditions, and what happens when they grow too large and dangerous to manage.”

For more coverage on extinction, explore our dedicated pages and follow Guardian App biodiversity journalists Phoebe Weston and Patrick Greenfield.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Openai responds to Elon Musk’s allegations of “illegal harassment” against the company

Elon Musk, the billionaire, was rebutted by ChatGpt developer Openai, who accused him of harassing the company. Openai requested a US federal judge to intervene and halt Musk’s “illegal and unfair behavior” towards the company.

Established in 2015 by Musk and CEO Sam Altman, Openai has seen ongoing disputes between the two founders, transitioning from a complex non-profit structure to a more conventional for-profit business.

Musk criticized the restructuring plan about a year ago, alleging that it betrayed the company’s fundamental mission by prioritizing profits over human interests. Although Musk withdrew the lawsuit in June, he filed a new one in August.

In February of this year, Musk led a consortium of investors in a surprising $97.4 billion bid for the company. Altman promptly rejected the offer, mentioning that Musk had acquired Twitter for $44 billion, rebranded as X in 2022.

In a recent filing in California’s district court, Openai accused Musk of using various tactics to harm the company, including press attacks, malicious campaigns to Musk’s large social media following, demands for access to corporate records, legal harassment, fake bids on Openai’s assets, among others.

Openai urged the judge to put a stop to Musk’s attacks and hold him accountable for the damages he has caused. The trial is set to commence in the spring of 2026.

Musk left Openai in 2018 and founded his own company, Xai. This year’s bid for Openai had the backing of Xai and other investment firms, including one led by Joe Lonsdale, a co-founder of Spy Technology Company Palantir.

Tesla executives have criticized Openai for deviating from its original charitable mission by creating a for-profit subsidiary to raise funds from investors like Microsoft. Despite its nonprofit beginnings, Openai argues that new models are required to advance the development of superior AI models.

Recently, Openai secured $400 billion in funding rounds from investors like SoftBank, valuing the company at $300 million. The funds will be used to further AI research, enhance computer infrastructure, and provide enhanced tools for the millions of people using ChatGPT weekly.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Since the viral success of ChatGpt in 2022, Openai has encountered various corporate controversies. In 2023, the board removed Altman, citing issues with his communication transparency. After much internal unrest, Altman was reinstated within a week following threats of resignation from many company members.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Donald Trump alleges Tesla boycott is “illegal”, plans to purchase company in support of mask production

Donald Trump announced that he was purchasing a “brand new Tesla” and placed blame on the “radical left-handed man” who he claimed was orchestrating an “illegal” boycott. This announcement followed a significant drop in Tesla’s stock price, the worst in nearly five years.

During a press conference, President Trump also declared his intention to classify the violence against Tesla showrooms as domestic terrorism, responding to a reporter’s suggestion that such actions should be labeled as such.

He mentioned that he had spoken with Elon Musk and his son on his White House driveway, with a selection of Tesla cars parked for his choosing. Trump ultimately opted for a red Model S, praising Musk’s contributions to the country.

Trump went on to accuse the “radical left madman” of attempting to illegally boycott Tesla and harm the American automaker, posting his remarks on True Social and affirming his commitment to stopping the damaging boycott efforts.

Despite claims of the boycott being illegal, the Supreme Court ruling from 1972 protects the right of Americans to peacefully protest against private companies, challenging Trump’s stance on the matter.

Tesla’s stock has seen significant declines amid protests and threats linked to Trump’s tariff plans. The TeslaTakeown Group, organizing anti-Tesla protests, insists on their right to peaceful demonstrations outside Tesla showrooms.

Reports indicate a sharp drop in Musk’s net worth over the past year, impacting Tesla’s profits. Tesla board members, including Musk’s brother, have sold off millions in stocks, while Tesla car sales have also declined.

The boycott against Tesla emerged in response to Musk’s controversial “Doge” initiative and concerns over lack of transparency in federal spending. Polls suggest mixed public sentiment towards Musk’s influence and actions.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Illegal Wildlife Trade: The Surprising Ease of Doing Business on Social Media

WWhen the baby parrots were delivered to Alice Soares de Oliveira’s desk, they had no wings and could barely open their eyes. The pair, housed in a dirty cardboard box, were just a month old and showed signs of not feeding well.

The parrot, along with two young toucans who arrived just under a month later, were victims of wildlife traffickers. They were all put up for sale on social media, probably snatched from their mother’s nest by poachers.

They were taken to Soares de Oliveira, a veterinarian. CeMaCAS, Wildlife Conservation Center in a forest on the outskirts of Brazil’s largest city, São Paulo, after being rescued by police surveillance networks on platforms such as Facebook and WhatsApp.




Illegal advertising of snakes for sale online in Brazil. Photo: Provided by RENCTAS

Social media has become an important tool for wildlife traffickers, experts say. For example, more people are using Facebook to promote the sale of endangered animals and their byproducts, often switching to messaging apps like WhatsApp to complete the sale.

Report published in October The Global Initiative against Transnational Organized Crime flagged 477 advertisements for 18 protected animals in Brazil and South Africa alone in three months this year. 78% of this was on social media.




The illegally traded parrot arrives at the CeMaCAS conservation center in poor condition after being rescued by the police. Photo: undefined/provided by CeMaCAS

Simone Haytham, director of environmental crime at the Global Initiative, said traders moved online after authorities cracked down on street markets. “The online space now provides a means for many of the world’s most endangered and most highly protected species to find consumers,” she says. “There’s a huge treasure trove of endangered species available for purchase online, but it’s no easy feat.”

Crawford Allan, vice president of nature crime at the World Wildlife Fund, said the pandemic has “systemized” wildlife crime online. “A lot of the public markets were closing down,” he says. “People couldn’t move, a lot of things went online, and it became the norm.”

Laws regarding the sale of wild animals vary by jurisdiction and species, so social media companies face a difficult situation in determining whether such ads are illegal. Nevertheless, experts say tech companies need to do more to determine when posts are risky.

Global Initiative combines AI technology and human analysis to detect suspicious ads online. The company’s reporting system, part of a project called Eco-Solve, covers Brazil, South Africa and Thailand, and will soon be expanded to India, Indonesia and the UAE.

Richard Scobie, executive director of TRAFFIC, an organization focused on wildlife trafficking, said advertising on social media allows sellers to “circumvent” the law and sell goods without telling buyers where they come from. He says it happens often.

“Companies need to allocate far more resources to regulating how users illegally trade wildlife parts and derivatives on their platforms,” ​​he says. “Social media companies are working to combat illegal transactions on their platforms…but there is much more they can do.”

Some tech companies are taking steps to combat this problem. In 2020, Facebook introduced tags for some search terms to warn users of the dangers of wildlife trafficking, and meta was removed. 7.6 million posts in 2023according to the Coalition Against Online Wildlife Trafficking.

The coalition is a voluntary association that includes most of the major social media companies in the United States and China.

It announced that in 2021, 11.6 million posts were blocked or deleted by members.




Parrots illegally traded after being recovered at CeMaCAS. Photo: undefined/provided by CeMaCAS

WWF’s Alan was a founding member of the federation and continues to oversee its activities. He said tech companies have been receptive to activists’ attempts to clamp down on their activities, but job cuts in the industry are hurting progress.

“As a conservation organization, we always feel that people need to do more, but we also understand that they are dealing with terrorism, child safety and all the evil in the world that flows through social media channels. They have bigger and scarier problems to deal with,” he added.

“I feel that some companies have found a balance. Others haven’t. They’re not working hard enough or they’re inactive for some reason, so they step up and do more. You need to make an effort.”

A spokesperson for Meta, which owns Facebook and WhatsApp, said: “We do not allow activities related to the purchase, sale, lottery, gifting, transfer or trading of endangered or protected species on our services.

“We use a combination of technology, team reviews, and user reports to identify behavior that violates our Terms of Service and respond to valid requests from law enforcement.”


Wildlife trafficking threatens biodiversity and can lead to the extinction of certain species. According to 2023 Forensic Science International articlesapproximately 5,209 animal species are endangered or nearly endangered due to “use and trade.”




Illegal online advertising of macaws for sale in Brazil. Photo: Undefined/Courtesy of RENCTAS

Mr Haytham said: [being advertised for sale online] It is protected as it is on the verge of extinction. They are protected because trade poses a major threat to their survival. ”

Soares de Oliveira of São Paulo believes the birds in his care have a bright future. Veterinarians at CeMaCAS care for hundreds of birds and animals at a time. She is confident that the parrot and toucan will make a full recovery and be released back into the wild.

“They are in the middle of rehabilitation. They are still young so we are monitoring them, but I think they will be able to live a free life in three months,” she says.

Find more coverage of extinction ages here and follow biodiversity reporters Phoebe Weston and Patrick Greenfield on the Guardian app for more nature coverage.

Source: www.theguardian.com

US Authorities Reportedly Considering Breaking Up Google After Ruling of Illegal Monopoly

The Justice Department is weighing various options, including the breakup of Alphabet Inc.’s Google, with a reported market capitalization of approximately $2 trillion, following a court ruling that tech giants monopolized the online search market illegally. The New York Times and Bloomberg News.

According to reports, one of the potential remedies frequently discussed by Justice Department lawyers is the sale of the Android operating system.

Authorities are also reportedly exploring options such as forcing the sale of Google’s search advertising program, AdWords, and its Chrome web browser.

A spokesman for the Justice Department stated that they are assessing the court’s decision and will determine the appropriate next steps in compliance with the court’s directives and applicable antitrust laws.

No decision has been made yet, as per a spokesman, and Google declined to comment. Google intends to appeal the ruling and faces a separate antitrust trial filed by the Department of Justice next month.

Other potential measures being considered by the Justice Department include mandating Google to share data with competitors and implementing safeguards to prevent unfair advantages with its AI products, according to sources familiar with the matter.

In the recent trial outcome, it was revealed that Google had paid over $26 billion in 2021 to secure agreements with companies like Apple to maintain its search engine as the default option on Safari, leading to monopoly allegations and anti-competitive practices, as ruled by the judge.

Following the judge’s ruling, rival search engine DuckDuckGo proposed banning exclusive agreements of this nature.

The ruling, issued last week, found Google in violation of antitrust laws and spending billions to establish an illegal monopoly that cemented its position as the global default search engine. This ruling marks a significant win for federal regulators challenging the dominance of tech giants in the market.

Skip Newsletter Promotions

In the last four years, federal antitrust regulators have sued Meta Platforms Inc., Amazon.com Inc., and Apple Inc. for allegedly maintaining monopolies unlawfully.

In 2004, Microsoft reached a settlement with the Department of Justice over claims that it compelled Windows users to use its Internet Explorer web browser.

Source: www.theguardian.com

What are the implications of a US judge’s ruling that Google has engaged in illegal monopolistic behavior?

Google was found to have created an illegal monopoly in online search and advertising by a federal court in a landmark antitrust lawsuit brought against it by the Department of Justice. This ruling will significantly impact Google’s operations and how people engage with the internet’s most popular websites.

The court specifically concluded that Google violated antitrust laws through exclusive agreements with device manufacturers like Apple and Samsung, paying them billions to ensure that Google products were the default search engine on their devices. These agreements allowed Google to establish a search monopoly and stifle competition unfairly.

The implications of this ruling will depend on what actions are taken next. It could lead to substantial changes in how Google conducts its business or potentially be weakened through the appeals process. The outcome will also have broader implications for how regulators address big tech companies and alleged monopolies.


Here’s what to expect following this decision.

The U.S. v. Google ruling did not specify remedies for Google’s monopoly on internet search, and the Justice Department did not seek penalties in its lawsuit. A separate trial will determine the remedies the government may impose on Google, which could range from contractual adjustments to a potential breakup of the company.

Judge Mehta could rule that Google is prohibited from entering exclusive search agreements, allowing it to be the default search engine if chosen by device manufacturers without the need for costly payments. Apple and Samsung have yet to comment on the ruling. Mozilla, reliant on Google payments, could face significant financial impact.

Judge Mehta may also consider options like browser choice screens seen in Europe to enhance competition. A harsher ruling could mandate the separation of Google’s search service from the rest of its operations and impose fines on antitrust violations.

Google intends to appeal the decision

Google rejected the court’s ruling and plans to appeal, initiating a legal battle with the Justice Department that could delay any repercussions for the company. Throughout the trial, Google maintained its superior product argument.


Past legal precedent suggests that a large technology company like Google may challenge an antitrust ruling successfully. Microsoft, in a similar case, managed to overturn key aspects of an antitrust decision against it through appeals.

Google has not disclosed its appeal timeline or response strategy following the ruling.

New Antitrust Lawsuit Looms

In addition to the current case, Google faces a forthcoming antitrust lawsuit concerning its digital advertising practices, alleging monopolistic behavior and stifling competition in that area.

This second lawsuit targets Google’s dominant position in the digital advertising industry, threatening a substantial revenue stream for the company. Google refutes the allegations and views the legal action as an attempt to gain unfair advantages.

The lawsuit is set for trial in September 2023.

Source: www.theguardian.com