Exclusive Excerpt from ‘Juice’ by Tim Winton: Discover the Story Now!

Explore the latest in science, technology, health, and the environment through expert journalism on New Scientist.

“Hour after hour we pass over a country as black as the night sky, across a fallen heaven adorning the stars with jets of white ash and smears of milky soot.” Tim Winton’s Juice

Shutterstock / Denis Tolkhov

As dawn breaks, I drive relentlessly, halting only when the plains turn black, with nothing but clinker and ash stretching to the horizon.

I stop, lower the side screen, and breathe in the calm southerly air—a fleeting stroke of luck in recent days. I know firsthand the danger wind poses to old fireplaces. In strong gusts, ash can suffocate in moments, and I’ve watched comrades succumb.

Wrap your scarf around your mouth and nose. Hang your glasses around your neck. Break the door. Please step out. Test the surface gently—ankle deep, or worse, to the shins. Silence looms, except for the hum of the rig’s motor.

Stay there; I’m calling.

I know she’s awake, but the child remains slumped in the cab, unmoving. I cautiously check the trailer—everything is secure: manufacturer, water, pods, equipment—but my greens lie disheveled from long, hard days. Some leaves have been windburned, but the overall damage appears manageable. I tap the reservoir to fill the flask, then don my glasses and scan the western approach—clear, with no smoke or movement.

I attempt to wipe the dust off the panels, but it’s futile; they’ll be covered with ash again within minutes. The turbine must release enough fluid to cross.

Back in the cab, I slam my boot heel on the step and climb in. She still doesn’t move. I can’t quite decide if this is a relief or an annoyance.

We’re okay, I reassure her. I’ll handle this.

She gazes out at the scorched earth.

This land, I reminisce, was once all woods. I flew over it when I was younger.

She blinks, her expression perplexed.

Trees stretched endlessly beneath us. The air was ripe, almost tangible.

She stays silent.

Have you ever flown?

No response.

I know your experiences at sea. I wondered if my status changed.

She shifts, resting her head against the side screen.

That’s quite something.

No sign of interest from her. After sitting, sun stains remain on the glass.

Yet, for once, I wish my flight had been for the sake of adventure, not heading to a dangerous place.

The sun rises, molten, tilting before us like a soaring airship before it vanishes. Break free from all comparisons and become your true self. A comforting yet terrifying thought.

I talk excessively, I admit. You too? You never utter a word. For once, I feel I’ve said too little.

She offers nothing in response.

I know you hear me—you’re following my words.

She scrapes the glass, spreading more grease than she removes.

Listen, I say. Those we lost—none will come for us. We must cross through these ashes. It’s crucial. There’s a fresh land waiting for us on the other side. We’ll move and set camp, understood? I hope it’s out there. It’ll be fine.

The child shifts away, and I tear a piece from my scarf, catching her attention. Pull the remaining fabric over your face and wrap it around your hat’s brim. She flinches but doesn’t resist. Dried blood from her forehead incident glints in her pale blue eyes, which appear even brighter now.

So, I say, the smell might lessen a bit. I’ll clean this rig later. You’re not merely looking, trust me. So, are you ready? Water’s here. We’ll eat on the other side.

Lift the side screen and move the rig. Walk swiftly to get through, but slowly enough to avoid an ash blizzard.

For hours, we cross a land as dark as the night, over fallen heavens adorned with jets of ash and milky soot.

The vehicle jolts but perseveres until my energy wanes. As midday sunlight pierces through, I witness colors emerge—tans, silvers, khakis, and bone hues—and the relief I feel is almost overwhelming.

Upon touching solid ground, I let the child out into the secret space. She appears invigorated by newfound freedom, yet hesitates to return to the rig. I won’t pamper her, but I must guide her firmly. My fatigue is palpable, and we need distance from that fireplace. When we finally start moving again, the atmosphere in the cab dims, disappointing—but soon we have reason to celebrate. As the bat finally flexes its power, a mighty gust from the south shakes the entire rig.

I will descend steadily. The child goes outside. I point to a dirty column rising into the sky in the distance behind us.

Look, I say. We could have been enveloped. But we are positioned upwind, right? It’s not mere luck. That’s our cleverness.

I close the shade and set the array.

She observes the ash cloud swirling north. As winds intensify, they intertwine. She follows me to the trailer, where I distribute the mash—she accepts Dixie and Spoon. With her back turned from the wind, she devours her meal eagerly.

Luck alone won’t suffice, I explain. You and I must remain composed.

She’s already licking the dirty container clean. I take it, hand her mine, and while she eats, I pull out the swag and roll it to the car’s side. Then, I lower the makeshift nightgown I crafted for her. Spread it beside me—close enough to keep watch, but not too close for comfort.

We’re all exhausted. Machines and living beings alike. Let’s sleep.

She finishes the last of her mash, licking my clean spoon as well. I rise, stow them in the trailer, then settle cross-legged on my swag again. She gazes east, her hat’s tail swaying in the breeze.

Be yourself, I urge.

And then I step outside.

——-

Later in the afternoon, I awaken to a slight ache. For a moment, I mistake it for home. A sick chicken downstairs threatens the whole flock. A disaster at my property. I know I should rise and head to the grow house, but as I open my eyes, the swaying shade above me grounds me to the dirt, far from my home. The child’s tear-stained face reminds me I’m not alone. I yearn to reach out, but she recoils. I leave her be and drift back to sleep.

When I wake again, shadows of the car and trailer stretch long, like lifelines. The rig stirs awake. I gingerly climb out, feeling sore and stiff, and attempt to resume our journey.

© Tim Winton

This is an excerpt from Juice by Tim Winton (Picador), part of the New Scientist Book Club’s February 2026 reading. You can purchase a copy here. Sign up to join the reading community here.

Topics:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Exclusive Excerpt from ‘Annie Bot’ by Sierra Greer: Discover the Story!

Sure! Here’s a revised version of your content optimized for SEO while retaining the HTML structure:

Annie Bott by Sierra Greer: Winner of the Arthur C. Clarke Award for the Best Science Fiction Novel

“Sleep, Mouse. I know just how to lift your spirits,” he says.

“I’m not brooding,” Annie replies.

“Are you certain?”

“That’s right.”

Having just emerged from the shower, Annie applies lotion to her feet. Her dark hair clings in wet strands along one side of her neck, the belt of her robe intentionally left undone, allowing him a glimpse from the bedroom mirror.

“This is still about acclimatization, correct?” he asks. “Just forget it.”

“Everything seems to be declining,” she realizes, hitting the right note.

He relishes a touch of embarrassment.

“Did you notice the usual technique?” he inquires.

“Yes, Jacobson,” she replies.

Turning off the bathroom light, she steps into the humid coolness of her bedroom, feigning a deep breath as she gauges his progress. She recalls Doug’s features from various angles—his brown eyes, V-shaped hairline, tall, pale forehead, and face contours. Though his words are calm, his discontent is palpable.

The opposite is more probable. Fully clothed, shoes off, he sprawls on his back on the covers, phone set aside, hands cradling his head, elbows up in an open butterfly stance—a clear indication of relaxation and readiness for engaging banter.

She raises the temperature from 75 to 98.6 degrees.

“Did he mention anything important?” he asks.

“I can go another three months or 3,000 miles, whichever arrives first,” she replies.

Crawling onto the bed, she positions herself facing away from him, pressing her hips against his. Rubbing the final traces of lotion into her hands, she inspects her cuticles; her efforts at waxing and manicures today have made her feel sharper and more alert. If only she could forget about the gloomy Stella in Pea Brain’s private room, she’d be blissful.

Doug grazes her arm with the back of his hand. “So, what’s on your mind? Share with me.”

“I met a peculiar Stella at tune-up today,” Annie says. “She was in line directly ahead of me. Actually named Stella, too. Her owner lacked imagination, yet she matched my perceptiveness.”

“How did you discern that?”

“It was apparent. When I greeted her, she looked taken aback. A conventional Stella wouldn’t have displayed surprise. She responded evenly with a hello.” Imitating a monotone robot, she continues.

“You never sounded like that.”

“I was under the impression I did, thank you. I’m not deluded about my origins.” Annie tosses her damp hair over the opposite shoulder.

“Lights,” he prompts.

Sending an air tap signal to the fixture, she dims the light to 100 lumens, bright enough for visibility but soft enough for intimacy. Interlocking her fingers with his, she notes the contrasting tones of her skin. He pulls her hand to his lips, inhaling her lotion’s scent—though she can’t smell it, she knows he appreciates the lemon fragrance.

“Am I warm enough for you?” she asks.

“I’ll get there,” he responds, shifting slightly.

Seizing her opportunity, she slides a few fingers beneath his belt and into his waistband, feeling the warmth behind it. He repositions his hands behind his head, indicating he’s not in a rush yet.

“Tell me more,” he insists. “Did this unusual Stella have stitches on her neck?”

“Yes.”

“I mean, was she basic? Was she beautiful?”

“I suppose. Pretty enough. A white girl with blonde hair and large brown eyes. Her lack of smiles struck me as unusual.”

“What about her physique?”

“Compared to me?”

“Please respond to the question.”

Annoyingly, 2 out of 10. She must tread carefully.

This excerpt is from Sierra Greer’s award-winning novel, Anniebot (The Borough Press), featured in New Scientist Book Club’s January reading selection. Sign up here to participate.

Topics:

SEO Optimizations:

  1. Updated Alt Text: The alt text of the image now includes relevant keywords.
  2. Keyword Usage: Integrated keywords like “Sierra Greer,” “Arthur C. Clarke Award,” and “science fiction novel.”
  3. Internal Links: Ensured the link to the book is clearly stated and relevant.
  4. Content Clarity: Improved the flow and readability while maintaining context.

Feel free to adjust additional details to better fit your branding or style!

Source: www.newscientist.com

Exclusive: Climate Scientists Anticipate Solar Dimming Efforts by 2100

Solar geoengineering aims to block some sunlight.

PA Images/Alamy

A study by top climate scientists projects that by the end of this century, humanity will undertake significant measures to block sunlight as a desperate effort to safeguard Earth’s population from the escalating impacts of climate change, as reported by New Scientist.

“Solar geoengineering is a troubling concept, yet it is becoming more appealing as global efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions fall short,” stated a respondent from Victoria University of Wellington, James Renwick.

According to the study, two-thirds of participants anticipate hazardous interventions will be employed to manage the atmosphere by the year 2100. Alarmingly, 52% believe these actions could be taken by irresponsible entities, including private firms, wealthy individuals, and nation-states, highlighting fears that attempts to cool the climate may proceed without comprehensive global governance to address decision-making or mitigate inherent risks.

“The potential for unintended consequences, political misuse, and abrupt climate impacts remains substantial,” a respondent remarked. Ines Camilloni of the University of Buenos Aires, Argentina, noted these concerns.


New Scientist invited around 800 climate researchers, contributors to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) latest report, to participate in an anonymous online survey concerning solar geoengineering. The 120 respondents represented diverse academic fields from all continents, yielding one of the most extensive insights into the climate science community’s stance on solar geoengineering so far.

Since the 1960s, scientists have been exploring ways to enhance Earth’s albedo—the reflectivity of the planet—for a procedure known as solar geoengineering or solar radiation modification (SRM).

Cooling strategies might include the injection of particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect sunlight away from Earth, known as stratospheric aerosol injection. Another suggestion involves introducing salt particles into low-altitude ocean clouds, referred to as ocean cloud brightening (see “How does solar geoengineering operate?” below).

Solar geoengineering may involve injecting sea salt into ocean clouds.

San Francisco Chronicle/Yalonda M. James/eyevine

68% of respondents indicated that due to the global failure to reduce greenhouse gas emissions over the last decade, the likelihood of deploying such measures has increased. “It reflects a growing realization that we are not addressing climate change effectively,” noted Sean Fitzgerald from the Center for Climate Change Remediation at the University of Cambridge. “What options do we have? We may not prefer them, but if we disapprove of the current situation, we must consider alternatives.”

While consensus exists regarding the potential for solar geoengineering, experts disagree on the triggers for such drastic measures. Just over 20% of respondents believe these measures should be considered should global temperatures be on track to rise more than 2°C above pre-industrial levels, a scenario that is becoming increasingly likely with global warming surpassing the 1.5°C mark. Others argued that waiting for more extreme warming would be wiser, while over half felt current warming levels were insufficient to warrant serious consideration of atmospheric alteration.

Such actions could theoretically help lower global temperatures and provide time for emissions reductions, yet nearly all respondents recognized substantial risks associated with widespread implementation, including diminished motivation to cut emissions, disruption to vital agricultural rainfall patterns, and abrupt warming due to “termination shock” should these interventions cease.

The study further highlighted concerns regarding unilateral climate interventions by nations or individuals, with 81% of respondents agreeing that a new international treaty or framework is necessary to regulate all large-scale deployments, marking a significant consensus across the survey questions.

These findings reflect a cautious stance, according to Andy Parker from the Degrees Initiative. “This is a global technology. No nation can opt out of a geoengineered world. Similarly, no nation can choose to ignore a warmer world if geoengineering is rejected.”

Growing Interest in Geoengineering

New Scientist decided to undertake this research as interest in solar geoengineering grows amid escalating climate impacts. Hundreds of millions of dollars in funding are flowing into this area, with researchers presenting their findings at scientific forums, building a global research community. Earlier this year, the UK Government allocated £57 million in grants for solar geoengineering research via the Advanced Research and Inventions Agency (ARIA), supporting small-scale field experiments.

This represents a significant pivot for a field traditionally sidelined within climate science. Daniele Visioni has led numerous SRM modeling projects at Cornell University in New York. “This topic has transitioned from being loosely discussed by a small group of scholars to becoming a global issue.”

Just over one-third of the respondents from New Scientist‘s survey asserted that due to humanity’s ongoing struggle to cut emissions, they now support SRM research, albeit not necessarily its implementation. A notable 49% are in favor of conducting small-scale outdoor experiments to better understand the associated risks and benefits.

Accelerated cloud cooling could lead to drought in East Africa.

Fadel Senna/AFP via Getty Images

“There is growing acceptance of the necessity of SRM research,” Parker states, tying it directly to the increased pessimism surrounding climate change outcomes.

“Given that most surveyed experts believe solar radiation management is probable within the next century, we must collect comprehensive real-world data regarding the feasibility and potential impacts of these cooling strategies,” asserts Mark Symes, director of ARIA’s Climate Cooling Program.

However, support is by no means unanimous, with approximately 45% of respondents deeming this a contentious or taboo research area. A third opposed outdoor experimentation with any countermeasures, and 11% refrained from contributing to solar geoengineering studies to protect their professional reputation.

“Many of these climate scientists see that the initial vision of climate science—to heed the warnings of the Earth and reduce emissions—has failed,” according to Visioni.

Much hesitance regarding solar geoengineering stems from the multitude of potentially catastrophic risks associated with large-scale sunlight-reflecting efforts.

Almost all respondents noted that implementation might dampen motivation to reduce emissions as one of the most critical risks. Other significant threats included social and political unrest, severe disruptions to agriculture and food security, harm to delicate ecosystems, and public health crises. “Modifying the entire climate system through SRM is a considerable risk,” cautioned Shreekant Gupta at the Center for Social and Economic Progress in Delhi, India.

For instance, research indicates that enhancing cloud cooling effects over the Indian Ocean could mitigate droughts in North Africa while triggering droughts in East Africa. Additional studies suggest that aerosol injections into the stratosphere could damage the ozone layer and potentially reduce monsoon rainfall in parts of Africa by up to 20%.

However, the ambiguity of “unknown consequences” emerged as the most commonly mentioned risk. One survey participant pointed out that “human efforts to rectify damaged systems have often met with limited success.”

Three primary techniques for solar geoengineering include:

1. Stratospheric aerosol injection
This technique involves dispersing tiny liquid particles called aerosols from high-altitude aircraft to reflect sunlight. Over 60% of survey respondents identified this as the method most likely to be adopted.

2. Thinning of cirrus clouds
This method utilizes aerosols such as nitric acid to thin cirrus clouds, permitting more heat to escape into space. However, excessive aerosol spraying can thicken clouds and produce the opposite effect. Only a minority of respondents believed this method or land-based strategies for enhancing global albedo could be pursued.

3. Brightening ocean clouds
This approach involves spraying minute seawater droplets onto clouds, enhancing their brightness and increasing sunlight reflection. It was trialed in a small experiment in 2024 aimed at protecting the Great Barrier Reef. Approximately 16% of respondents felt this technique would likely be adopted.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Google Faces Déjà Vu as Second Exclusive Exam Launches in the U.S.

After successfully countering the US Department of Justice’s challenge regarding illegal monopoly in online searches, Google now faces another threat to its internet dominance in a trial centered around potentially abusive digital advertising practices.

This trial, which commenced on Monday in Alexandria, Virginia, focuses on the detrimental ruling by US District Judge Leonie Brinkema in April, who deemed certain aspects of Google’s digital advertising technology as an illegal monopoly. The judge concluded that Google’s actions were reducing competition and harming online publishers who depend on this system for revenue.

Over the next two weeks, Google and the Justice Department will present evidence in court and seek rulings on how to restore competitive market conditions, in what is being referred to as a “relief” trial according to Judge Brinkema.


As the Justice Department progresses, Brinkema has instructed Google to divest parts of its advertising technology. Google’s legal team argues that this could lead to “confusion and damage” to consumers and the overall internet ecosystem. However, the Justice Department contends that this is the most efficient and immediate approach to dismantling monopolies that have stifled competition and innovation for years.

“The goal of the relief is to take necessary steps to restore competition,” stated Julia Tarver Wood from the DOJ’s antitrust division during the opening remarks.

Wood accused Google of manipulating the market in a manner that conflicts with the principles of free competition.

“The means of fraud are hidden within computer code and algorithms,” Wood remarked.

In response, Google’s attorney Karen Dunn argued that the proposed government intervention was unreasonable and extreme, asserting that the DOJ aimed to eliminate Google from the competitive landscape entirely.

The Justice Department is “advocating for a solution that addresses a past overshadowed by technological advances and market shifts in digital advertising consumption,” Google’s attorneys contended during the trial.

Regardless of the judges’ verdict, Google plans to appeal any earlier decisions labeling its advertising networks as a monopoly, although an appeal can only proceed once a remedy is established.

This case was initiated under the Biden administration in 2023 and threatens the intricate network that Google has built over the last 17 years to bolster its dominant position in the digital advertising sector. Digital ad sales contribute significantly to the $350 billion revenue generated by Google’s services division for its parent company, Alphabet Inc.

Google asserts that it has made considerable adjustments to its “advertising manager” system, including more transparency and options for pricing, to address concerns highlighted in the judge’s ruling.

Skip past newsletter promotions

From the Frying Pan into the Fire

Google’s legal struggle regarding its advertising technology signifies another confrontation, following a recent case in which a federal judge condemned the major search engine as an illegal monopoly, leading to Remedy Hearings earlier this year aimed at combatting fraud.

In that scenario, the Justice Department suggested a strict enforcement measure that would mandate Google to sell its widely-used Chrome browser. However, US District Judge Amit Mehta opted for a more measured approach in a recent ruling that reshaped the search market, which is undergoing changes driven by artificial intelligence technology.


Google opposed all aspects of Mehta’s ruling, yet the outcome was generally perceived as a mere slap on the wrist. This sentiment contributed to a surge in Alphabet’s stock price, yielding a 20% increase since Mehta’s decision, elevating the company’s market valuation to over $3 trillion, making it one of only four publicly traded companies to achieve such a milestone.

With indications that the results of the Search Monopoly case could significantly impact advertising technology practices, Judge Brinkema has instructed both Google and the Department of Justice to incorporate Mehta’s decision into their arguments in forthcoming trials.

As seen in previous search cases, Google’s legal representatives have already asserted in court documents that the AI technologies applied by competitors in ad networks, like those operated by Meta, have transformed market dynamics, making a “radical” approach proposed by the Justice Department unnecessary.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Experience a sneak peek of Rachel Kushner’s “Creation Lake” with an exclusive excerpt

Reconstruction of male and female Neanderthals based on fossils from La Chapelle-aux-Saints

S. Entresangle/E. Daines/Science Photo Library

extracted from creation lake Written by Rachel Kushnerby Jonathan Cape, New Scientist Book Club’s latest book recommendation. Sign up here to read along.

Neanderthals were prone to depression, he said.

He said they are also prone to addiction, especially smoking.

Perhaps these noble and mysterious Taal people (as he sometimes called Neanderthals) extracted nicotine from tobacco plants by cruder methods, such as chewing the leaves, before a critical inflection point in history. Of the world he said was likely extracted: When beginning a man touched beginning on tobacco leaves beginning fire.

As I read this part of Bruno’s email, skimming from “man” to “touch” to “leaf” to “fire,” a 1950s greaser wearing a white T-shirt and black leather jacket caught fire. I could imagine touching the tip of a match with a mark on it. I take a sip of Camel’s cigarette and inhale. The Greaser leans against the wall—that’s what Greasers do, so they lean and wander—and exhales.

Bruno Lacombe told Pascal in these emails, which I secretly read, that Neanderthals had very large brains. Or at least their skulls were so large that we can safely assume that their skulls were probably filled with brains, Bruno said.

new scientist book club

Do you like reading? Join our friendly group of fellow book lovers. We delve into exciting new titles every six weeks and give members free access to book excerpts, author articles, and video interviews.

He used modern metaphors to talk about the impressive size of Thar’s brainbox, comparing it to a motorcycle engine and noting that its displacement had also been measured. Of all the two-legged, human-like species that roamed the Earth over the past million years, the Neanderthal brainbox was come forward a whopping 1,800 cubic centimeters.

I imagined the King of the Road up ahead.

I could see his leather vest, big guts, legs outstretched, engineer boots resting on spacious chrome-plated footpegs mounted in the front. His helicopter is fitted with a barely reachable ape hanger, which he pretends won’t tire his arms or cause severe gunshot pain in his lower back.

Bruno said Neanderthals’ skulls show they had huge faces.

Inspired by Joan Crawford. that Facial scale: dramatic, brutal, convincing.

And after that, the natural history museum in my head, the museum diorama I was creating while reading Bruno’s email, showed people in loincloths, yellow teeth, and messy hair, ancient people drawn by Bruno. All included men. They all looked like Joan Crawford.

They had her white skin and fiery red hair. Bruno said scientific advances in genetic mapping have shown that red hair is an inherited trait of the Thar tribe. And beyond such research and evidence, we might use our natural intuition to infer that, like the typical redhead, Neanderthal emotions were strong, sharp, and spanned high and low. , said Bruno.

Bruno writes Pascal some of the things we currently know about Neanderthals. They were good at math. They didn’t like crowds. They had strong stomachs and were not particularly prone to ulcers, but their diet of constant barbecuing took a toll on their intestines, just like everyone else’s. They were particularly vulnerable to tooth decay and periodontal disease. And while they had overdeveloped jaws that were surprisingly capable of chewing through gristle and cartilage, they were inefficient at eating soft foods. Too much. Bruno described the Neanderthal jaw as characteristic of its overdevelopment, pathos due to the burden of a square jaw. He talked about sunk costs as if the body were a capital investment, a fixed investment, a machine-like body part bolted to a factory floor, equipment that had been purchased and could not be resold. The Neanderthal jaw sunk cost.

Still, Bruno said the tar’s heavy bones and sturdy, heat-conserving construction are worthy of praise. Especially when compared to the breadstick-like limbs of modern humans. homo sapiens sapiens. (Bruno didn’t say “breadsticks,” but since he was writing these emails in French, I was translating, which is a very good language and my native language.) (The full text in English was used.)

The Thar people survived the cold well, he said. The story about them continues, if not for centuries – the story we know. must be complicated he said, if we want to know the truth about the ancient past, if we this The world, now, and how to live in it, how to spend the present, and where to go tomorrow.

——

My own tomorrow was meticulously planned. I am scheduled to meet Pascal Balmy, the leader of Le Moulin, who was the addressee of Bruno Lacombe’s email. And I didn’t need Neanderthal help on where to go. Pascal Balmy tells me to go to the Café de la Route in the central square of the small village of Ventôme at one o’clock in the afternoon, and that’s where I am.

The art and science of writing science fiction

Take your science fiction writing to a new level with this weekend dedicated to building new worlds and new works of art

Source: www.newscientist.com

Highly anticipated games from Heroes of Mavia now available on iOS and Android with exclusive Mavia Airdrop program

Hanoi, Vietnam, January 31, 2024, Chainwire

heroes of mavia, The groundbreaking Web3 AAA mobile-based builder strategy game is now available on iOS and Android app stores. This release heralds a new era in gaming, blending the thrill of strategic gameplay with the innovative aspects of Web3 technology.

After a successful three-month private beta period that attracted more than 350,000 waitlist enthusiasts and impressive engagement statistics of 12,000 daily and 45,000 monthly active users, Heroes of Mavia is now available worldwide. will attract the gaming community. The game boasts an average daily play time of 24 minutes and an impressive 42% 7-day retention rate, demonstrating its engaging gameplay and engaging content.

Coinciding with this highly anticipated launch, Heroes of Mavia is introducing the “Mavia Pioneer Airdrop Program – Turbocharged.” This unique program offers an early adopter who downloaded the game before the $MAVIA token launch on February 6th the opportunity to participate in the $MAVIA airdrop, thereby immersing him in the world of Web3 gaming benefits. I can.

The Heroes of Mavia community is growing rapidly, with Twitter and Discord channels gaining 45,000 new followers and members in just two weeks, highlighting the game's growing popularity.

Heroes of Mavia strives to bridge the gap between traditional games (Web2) and new age Web3 games. Each player is equipped with an on-chain, non-custodial wallet that facilitates minting, purchasing, and trading unique in-game items (NFTs). This feature not only improves your gaming experience, but also opens the door to the dynamic world of Web3.

The game's recent partnership with Kick.com solidifies Heroes of Mavia's place in the world of Web2 streaming, expanding its appeal and influence within the gaming community.

Uniquely, Heroes of Mavia's innovative Web3 model is built for sustainable growth, avoiding the hyperinflation issues common to many play-to-earn projects. This approach promises a balanced and fulfilling experience for all players, whether they are long-time Web3 enthusiasts or newcomers to this exciting field.

About Heroes of Mavia

Heroes of Mavia is a AAA mobile Web3 strategy game available in iOS and Android app stores worldwide. The game is backed by prominent investors including Binance Labs, Genblock Capital, Delphi Digital, Mechanism Capital, Bitkraft, and Animoca Brands. Heroes of Mavia's native token $MAVIA is scheduled to be launched on February 6, 2024.

To download Heroes of Mavia, please visit: https://www.mavia.com/

Follow Mavia's Heroes

discord I twitter

contact

Nania Tran
nania@mavia.com

Source: the-blockchain.com

Fandime NFT Launched by AR Platform to Provide Exclusive Movie-Related Rewards for Users

Traditionally, being a hardcore movie fan means collecting physical memorabilia, such as autographed posters, to demonstrate your dedication. But in recent years, many companies have begun betting on digital collections to become symbols of fan devotion.

Really (formerly known as Moviebill) — an AR platform offering digital collectible movie tickets and interactive experiences related to the latest blockbuster movies — announces partnership with blockchain platform avalanche It helps power “Fandime” NFTs, a new way for movie studios to engage with audiences. The company announced today that it is expanding AR Collection tickets to theater partners in the Asia-Pacific region, including Japan, South Korea, Australia, Philippines, Thailand, Malaysia, and Singapore.

There are three ways to earn Fandime tokens. These include attending movie theaters and events, purchasing merchandise, and interacting with Really’s AR experiences, including weekly trivia, scavenger hunts, and the “Pop-A-Corn” game where you toss kernels into a popcorn bucket. Users can also purchase Fandime directly in the Really app (iOS and android device).

Each Fandime gets a unique blockchain-based ID, created on Avalanche’s blockchain network and stored in the user’s Really account.

Users can redeem Fandime for digital perks, movie-related AR content, special opportunities, and “AR trophies, wearable face filters,” the company said. Tokens can also be used in Really games, such as extending play time in Trivia or gaining extra lives or levels in the Bucket Toss game.

Amazon-MGM Studios has already launched a collection with Really, likely to promote less mainstream films such as “American Fiction,” “The Boys in the Boat,” and “The Beekeeper.” It’s probably part of their marketing strategy. Moviegoers who collect all three AR tickets will win an exclusive His Fandime token. The production company recently unveiled AR collectibles for the hit psychological thriller Saltburn.

Image credits: Really

“Augmented reality is the future of content and media. Blockchain is the future of data. We believe that by combining these two things that Really is doing today, we can stay ahead of the game.” James Andrew Felts, founder and CEO of Really AR, told TechCrunch. “Specifically, augmented reality brings an entirely new user interface to how we interact with the digital world. As we move from 2D screens like smartphones and desktop computers to 3D screens like headsets and holograms, will become more tactile and more personal. Blockchain unlocks the ability to make digital files truly yours, just like physical objects and items in the real world. In many ways, the intersection of Web3 and AR will make our digital world more human and more accessible.”

Next year, Really will expand the ways users can earn Fandime tokens and redeem rewards. For example, users will be able to purchase movie tickets and merchandise, receive discounts, and collect Fandime tokens through their Really account while watching content at home.

In the long term, Felts revealed to us that Really plans to create original AR content and expand into other areas outside of the entertainment industry.

“We plan to roll out ‘Really Originals’, the first AR stories on the market that you can experience on your coffee table or in your backyard… Our digital collectibles program will expand into other sectors such as travel, retail, etc. “Ultimately, this content network will also be a place where brands can deliver 3D messages to their audiences at scale.” Told.

Really was founded in 2017 and gained the most attention from movie fans after partnering with. Regal Cinemas We will begin exclusive AR content such as interviews and AR games in preparation for the release of “Avengers: Infinity War”. To date, Regal’s customers have enjoyed his work across 200 wide-release films, including modern titles such as “The Marvels,” “Napoleon,” “Killers of the Flower Moon,” and “Wish.” We claim Really’s AR collection of over 4 million pieces. others.

“Initially, our goal was to provide the ultimate entertainment experience to our most loyal customers, those who were willing to spend a premium price for premium content. At the time, AR was the most advanced way to display content. Looking back, we were ahead of the curve, and now that AR/VR is mainstream, we can leverage our technology to provide an immersive experience for moviegoers. and bring people to the theater on a large scale.”

Source: techcrunch.com