Nvidia CEO: US Chip Export Controls Misfire by Boosting China’s Progress

Jensen Huang, head of Nvidia, stated that US chip export controls are a “fail” during his remarks at the High-Tech Forum on Wednesday.

In an effort to limit China’s military advancements and maintain US dominance in the AI sector, successive US administrations have placed restrictions on the sale of advanced AI chips to China. However, Huang indicated at the Computex Tech forum in Taipei that these controls have inadvertently motivated Chinese developers.

“The local companies are exceptionally skilled and highly motivated, and export control has provided them with the momentum, energy, and governmental backing to speed up their progress,” Huang shared at the Computex Tech Show in Taipei.

“On the whole, I believe export control has been a failure.”



“It’s crucial to acknowledge that China boasts a dynamic technological ecosystem, with 50% of the world’s AI researchers, and excels in software development,” Huang emphasized.

Nvidia, known for its high-performance GPUs, faces challenges due to US chip export regulations. Huang mentioned on Wednesday that the company has incurred “billions of dollars” in losses, with its share of the AI chip market in China plummeting from nearly 95% to 50% since the Biden administration took office.

According to the Financial Times, Huang made an unannounced trip to Beijing last month.

This visit took place shortly after new US restrictions prohibited the shipment of Nvidia’s H20 Datacentre GPU to China.

The US government informed NVIDIA that the new regulations aim to mitigate the risk of the product being “used in Chinese supercomputers.”

Huang’s Beijing conference reportedly focused on the AI company’s latest chip design, as per the FT report.

Last week, the Trump administration rolled back certain existing controls on chip sales to China after several countries expressed that they were being excluded from the essential technologies required for AI development.

Nonetheless, they issued new guidelines for other nations, warning that utilizing high-tech AI semiconductors produced in China, especially chips from Huawei, could breach existing US export regulations.

In retaliation, China accused the United States of “misusing export controls to suppress and restrict China.” The Commerce Department stated on Wednesday that the warning exemplifies “unilateral bullying and protectionism, significantly jeopardizing the stability of the global semiconductor industry and supply chains.”

Moreover, it cautioned that organizations or individuals enforcing or supporting such actions might be violating Chinese law.

Source: www.theguardian.com

How US Loopholes Boosted China’s Export Power

Nearly a decade ago, Congress increased the import threshold from $200 to $800, facilitating access to the American consumer market.

In response, Chinese companies rapidly entered this sphere. Initially on platforms like eBay and Amazon, and later on apps like Shein and Temu, exporters leveraged China’s extensive manufacturing capabilities to funnel products directly into the US market.

This change in policy in 2016 significantly transformed the economic relationship between the two nations.

For decades, the US has been receiving goods from Chinese factories, benefiting from their manufacturing efficiency. The newly expanded, tariff-free loophole has made American consumers increasingly addicted to purchasing inexpensive exercise clothes and home gadgets online. In turn, millions of Chinese workers have found employment in factories catering to the e-commerce market. The influence extends to major players like Amazon and Walmart, as well as platforms such as Shane, Temu, and TikTok.

This surge in transactions has been remarkable. Last year, approximately 4 million packages arrived daily in the United States without customs inspections or fees.

However, changes were implemented on Friday, affecting trade between the two largest economies. Most packages from mainland China and Hong Kong are now subject to customs duties, even if valued under $800.

People in both nations are already noticing the shift. American consumers are encountering higher prices at checkout, while Chinese exporters are actively seeking new markets beyond the US.

Several factories in southern China, where much of the manufacturing hub resides, have been closing since early April, raising concerns about job losses.

Zhang Yikui, a worker at a factory in Guangzhou producing clothing for Amazon, mentioned that his factory’s output has dropped from 100,000 pieces monthly to around 60,000. He and about 40 colleagues were seen sewing denim dresses amid piles of Shane bags.

Zhang stated he is looking for new buyers: “People in other countries still need clothing. The US doesn’t manufacture anything like this.”

Even lesser-known Chinese manufacturers have successfully entered the American market. Eddie Chang, an e-commerce consultant in Hong Kong, previously managed Walmart’s China e-commerce operations.

“Changes have happened rapidly over the past few months,” he remarked.

Trade tensions present significant challenges to China’s economic growth, which heavily relies on exports. In April, President Trump raised tariffs to 145% on over half of China’s exports to the US, and recent official data indicates that new export orders have plummeted to their lowest since 2022.

Ting Lu, chief economist at Nomura, reported this week that nearly 6 million jobs in China could be lost in the short term due to tariffs, with potential losses rising to 16 million in the longer term.

The Chinese government is struggling to move away from its longstanding dependence on the real estate sector, which has seen a sharp price decline and has adversely affected consumer spending.

China’s cross-border e-commerce landscape has a multitude of factories that are vital to its success, making it one of the few sectors showing signs of growth.

Established over a decade ago, the emergence of platforms like Amazon and Shein coincided with China’s government efforts to expand opportunities in overseas markets for small and medium-sized enterprises.

These apps serve as channels for a diverse array of products produced in China, empowering local companies to ship packages directly to consumers and efficiently manage inventory. This accessibility has helped even small factories become global players, as noted by Harvard University professor Moira Weigel, who is researching the online marketplace.

This context facilitated Congress’s decision to raise the tax-free limit to $800, promoting access to affordable international goods for consumers and small businesses, while other nations sought to boost US exports. However, the United States remains an anomaly among significant trading partners, with China’s tax-free import threshold set at just $7.

For nearly a century, federal law exempted inexpensive goods from import taxes. The threshold was raised from $5 in 1978 to $200 in 1993.

The increase to $800 unlocked vast potential, positioning China as the largest exporter under De Minimis rules. In 2018, Chinese firms sent out packages worth about $5 billion, averaging $54 each, which skyrocketed to $66 billion by 2023, according to Congressional Research Services data.

The ongoing trade tensions and the termination of the US tax-free policy threaten to disrupt this progress.

Han Dong Hwan, founder of China’s Labor Bulletin, which monitors protests regarding factory closures, warned that the impact of tariffs could be “far worse” than the job losses experienced during the pandemic.

Some factories are turning to e-commerce platforms in Europe and Southeast Asia to find new markets for their products, while Chinese e-commerce consultants offer guidance on selling items on eBay in Japan or Amazon in Brazil.

Other Chinese sellers have begun stockpiling US goods, even acquiring warehouse space from Amazon and Walmart.

In response, the Chinese government has not only imposed high tariffs on US imports but also encouraged local consumers to buy domestically produced goods. However, as Qiu Dongxiao, dean of economics at Linnan University in Hong Kong, points out, if unemployment rises, consumer spending may diminish.

“Even those currently employed are unsure about their job security, making them hesitant to spend money,” Qiu states.

siyi Zhao Reports of contributions.

Source: www.nytimes.com

Has China halted the export of rare earth metals?

The Chinese government has long been exerting control over the export of rare earths, a group of metals crucial for products like semiconductors and light. In the ongoing trade war with the US, China is taking further steps to restrict the market for these metals, potentially impacting American manufacturing and military capabilities. So, why are rare earths so important?

Rare earths consist of 17 types of metals across the periodic table, essential for various industries such as technology, energy, and transportation. Names like terbium, praseodymium, and dysprosium are important ingredients in advanced technologies.

These metals can be categorized into heavy and light rare earths, with heavy ones being rarer and selling in smaller quantities. Light rare earths like neodymium and praseodymium are crucial for creating magnets.

Rare earths have diverse applications, from semiconductor chips powering AI to electric vehicle motors and military equipment. They also enhance heat resistance in products like magnets, glass, lights, and batteries, making them valuable for industries.

Some rare earths possess unique chemical properties that make them ideal for producing high-quality magnets, glass, lights, and batteries. Magnets made from rare earths are exceptionally powerful and essential for electric vehicles.

The US has only one operational rare earth mine in Mountain Pass, California, contributing about 15% to the global market. In the past, the US was a significant rare earth producer, but its production declined over the years compared to China.

Rare earths are mined from rock deposits, with China dominating nearly 70% of the market. China’s control over rare earths’ production and export has geopolitical implications, impacting various industries worldwide.

If China restricts rare earth exports, American sectors like automotive may face production halts. The US military could also be impacted, leading to shortages of essential equipment like drones and missiles. Tech giants like Nvidia and Apple could also feel the effects.

Many rare earth mining businesses in China have been under private or foreign ownership, but the government’s efforts to consolidate the industry could lead to complete control over manufacturing and exports.

Source: www.nytimes.com

Multiple nations implement baffling export restrictions on quantum computers

Exports of quantum computers are restricted in many countries

Saigh Anys/Shutterstock

As a result of secret international negotiations, governments around the world have imposed identical export controls on quantum computers while refusing to disclose the scientific rationale behind the controls. Although quantum computers could theoretically threaten national security by breaking encryption technology, even the most advanced quantum computers currently publicly available are too small and error-prone to achieve this, making the bans seem pointless.

The UK: Quantum computers with more than 34 quantum bits (qubits) and error rates below a certain threshold. The intention seems to be to limit machines with certain capabilities, but the UK government has not stated this explicitly. New Scientist A Freedom of Information request seeking the basis for these figures was denied on national security grounds.

France has also imposed similar export controls. Quantum Bits The numbers and error rates are also improving, as are Spain and the Netherlands. Having the same limits across European countries might suggest EU regulation, but this is not the case. A spokesperson for the European Commission said: New Scientist EU member states are free to adopt national, rather than bloc-wide, measures when it comes to export controls. “The recent quantum computer restrictions by Spain and France are an example of such national measures,” they said. They declined to explain why the figures for the EU's various export bans are completely consistent if these decisions were taken independently.

A spokesman for the French Embassy in London said: New Scientist The limits were set at a level “likely to indicate a cyber risk,” they said. They noted that the regulations are the same in France, the UK, the Netherlands and Spain because of “multilateral negotiations that took place over several years under the Wassenaar Arrangement.”

“The limits chosen are based on scientific analysis of the performance of quantum computers,” the spokesperson said. New ScientistBut when asked for clarification about who carried out the analysis and whether its findings would be made public, a spokesman declined to comment further.

of Wassenaar Agreement The system, which is followed by 42 participating countries including EU member states, the UK, the US, Canada, Russia, Australia, New Zealand and Switzerland, controls the export of items with potential military applications, known as dual-use technologies. The export ban on quantum computers also includes similar language regarding 34 qubits..

New Scientist We wrote to dozens of Wassenaar member states asking whether there was quantum-computer-level research that posed a risk to export, whether it had been made public, and who had conducted it. Only a few countries responded.

“We closely monitor other countries as they introduce national restrictions on certain technologies,” a spokesperson for the Swiss Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs, Education and Research said, “but in specific cases it is already possible to block the export of such technologies using existing mechanisms.”

“We are closely following the Wassenaar discussions on the exact technical control parameters for quantum.” Milan Godin, Belgian Advisor to the EU Working Party on Dual-Use Goods, Belgium. China does not appear to have implemented its own export controls yet, but Godin said quantum computers are a dual-use technology. It has the potential to crack commercial or government codes, and its speed could ultimately enable militaries to plan faster and better, including for nuclear missile attacks.

A spokesperson for Germany's Federal Office for Economics and Export Control confirmed that the export restrictions on quantum computers are the result of negotiations under the Wassenaar Agreement, but Germany does not appear to have implemented any restrictions. “The negotiations are confidential and unfortunately we cannot provide any details or information about the considerations of the restrictions,” the spokesperson said.

Christopher MonroeThe co-founder of quantum computing company IonQ said industry participants have been aware of similar bans and are discussing their criteria, but he doesn't know where they come from.

“I don't know who decided the logic behind these numbers,” he says, but it may have something to do with the threshold for simulating a quantum computer with a regular computer. This gets exponentially harder as the number of qubits increases, so Monroe thinks the rationale behind the ban may be to limit quantum computers that are too advanced to simulate, even though such devices have no practical use.

“It would be a mistake to think that just because we can't simulate the behavior of a quantum computer doesn't mean it's useful, and severely restricting research into advances in this grey area would certainly stifle innovation,” he says.

topic:

  • safety/
  • Quantum Computing

Source: www.newscientist.com

TUNL, a South African e-commerce startup, secures funding to boost expansion of export platform

tunnelSouth African parcel delivery platform has secured $1 million in pre-seed funding from investors including Founders Factory Africa, Digital Africa Ventures, E4E Africa and Jozi Angels.

The platform claims that e-commerce merchants can save between 50% and 80% on international shipping costs, and the funding will fuel expansion in its key market South Africa, as well as launches in other key African countries. He said that he would lay the foundation for the Emerging markets.

CEO Matthew Davey cum COO craig lowman Mr Davey founded the company in 2022 after seeking a solution to the challenges he faced as managing director of a Dutch company importing South African engineering materials into Europe. In his interview with TechCrunch, Davey said the process of moving these materials is cumbersome and expensive, and his experience shows that transportation costs are widespread, especially for small and medium-sized businesses in emerging markets like South Africa. I’ve come to recognize the problem.

Current challenges in cross-border transportation are costing African businesses an estimated $50 billion a year in missed opportunities. The founders of TUNL identified a recurring problem among small and medium-sized traders in South Africa during the pandemic. That meant that shipping costs could exceed the value of the item. This also applies to high-quality goods such as textiles, clothing, footwear, camera accessories, and specialty components, despite the presence of major courier services such as DHL, UPS, and FedEx.

Typically, Cape Town sellers offer only one shipping option, such as DHL, to customers looking to purchase goods abroad. For example, a backpack might cost $60, and shipping from South Africa to the US could be about the same, $50-60, which could negatively impact your conversion rate. What TUNL has done is partner with delivery services like UPS and FedEx to ensure reasonable rates and subsidize shipping costs for small and medium-sized businesses by 50% to 75%.

“Our pricing is fully transparent and democratized. We want every business, large or small, to be able to transform their international sales by reducing shipping costs as much as possible. We want to make sure they have an equal opportunity to do the same,” Lowman said in a statement.

On the TUNL platform, sellers offer a variety of shipping options to their customers at checkout. This includes an “economy” option that incorporates shipping costs into the product price, allowing free shipping via TUNL’s courier service and slightly longer delivery times (approximately 10-14 days). Reduce cart abandonment at checkout. Alternatively, customers can choose expedited shipping options (within a week) via FedEx or UPS for a more reasonable price, such as $10 for the same backpack, allowing for more flexibility and potentially higher exchange rates. (The exact price may vary depending on destination and weight, but Davey says this is a consistent approximate number).

“It’s all about helping sellers succeed,” said the CEO. “Because if there’s only one expensive shipping option at checkout and the customer has two choices, they’re not going to buy it. “They can decide to abandon their cart or pay up.” “But when you introduce two shipping options, especially a free shipping option, human psychology forces the customer to choose one of the two, rather than abandoning the cart. .”

Primarily, South African e-commerce merchants using TUNL tend to ship most of their goods to the US, UK, Europe and Australia. Two-thirds of the shipments end up in the United States, Davey said. TUNL, which competes with Ivorian startups and platforms such as DHL partner ANKA, has grown 35% month-on-month since its launch and now has more than 700 merchants in its “delivery club.” TUNL’s merchants shipped more than 8,000 international parcels in 2023, representing R19.5 million worth of exports from South Africa, the company said in a statement.

The two-year-old e-commerce platform makes money by taking a margin from orders placed on its platform. The products we handle are wide-ranging, including backpacks, fashion shoes, arts and crafts, books, nanofiber materials, high-performance springs, various furniture, musical instruments, cosmetics, and other preserved foods. South Africa is known for its wine industry, with exports reaching 368.5 million liters last year. And although the transport of wine (alcohol) is not yet included in TUNL’s export items due to existing restrictions, Davey said the startup is now one of South Africa’s largest wine subscription businesses and its business He said he is in discussions about the possibility of participating. .

“We are getting a message from our merchants that we have transformed their business. They are adding new employees and growing because of us. So if our merchants are only serving the South African market, “It’s a win-win for the ecosystem to make people feel like they can look at the world as a market, rather than the only market they can serve,” he said. “We help merchants grow internationally just as we help them succeed, because the overseas consumer market is much larger than the domestic market for these types of products. ”

Davey said TUNL, which makes about $60,000 a month, will now focus on using the seed funding to improve sales and the onboarding process for new franchisees. In particular, the onboarding experience has been streamlined, relying primarily on customer support assistance and taking a more self-service approach.

Source: techcrunch.com