Revealing Proton Size: New Insights into the Fundamental Particle

Vacuum chamber used to measure electronic transitions in atomic hydrogen, aiding in estimating proton size.

Axel Beyer/MPQ

Newly acquired data reveals the true size of the proton, marking a significant milestone in particle physics. Over 15 years ago, a surprising experiment reshaped our understanding of this subatomic particle’s fundamental properties.

Protons are essential constituents of matter, and until 2010, our comprehension of their structure seemed complete. We recognized that protons consist of three quarks, but uncertainties about their size lingered.

Recent investigations involving exotic hydrogen atoms suggest that protons may actually be 4% smaller than previously thought. Research teams are now tirelessly exploring sources of error and theories that might illuminate the proton radius puzzle. In 2019, an additional experiment reinforced indications that the proton’s size had been overestimated.

Excitingly, the confusion surrounding proton size appears to be resolved through two complementary experiments, which convincingly support the idea of smaller protons. Their findings indicate that the proton’s radius is approximately 0.84 femtometers—an astonishing measurement, less than one millionth of a meter.

As physicist Dylan Yost from Colorado State University explains, “Reviewing the data makes you reconsider the betting odds on the proton’s radius. These measurements significantly bolster our understanding.”

To ascertain this new radius, both research teams focused their efforts on hydrogen atoms, which consist of one proton and one electron. The electromagnetic interaction between these oppositely charged particles is influenced by the proton’s size, allowing researchers to deduce its dimensions by observing electron energy transitions.

Using lasers, the teams manipulated electrons in hydrogen atoms, measuring three previously unrecorded energy transitions.

The calculated proton radius not only aligned with each other but also confirmed the crucial 2010 measurements. As physicist Lothar Meisenbacher from the University of California, Berkeley noted, “It’s extremely unlikely that this proton radius puzzle persists.”

Conducting these experiments was no small feat. The teams placed hydrogen atoms in complete vacuum environments, utilized expensive lasers, and meticulously calibrated their equipment. While data collection might take weeks, it often requires years to eliminate potential disturbances and errors, according to Meisenbacher.

Yet, if multiple experiments produce comparable results, diversity in methodologies can serve as an advantage, ensuring that equipment-specific errors do not skew findings. Juan Rojo from Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam emphasizes that “the proton’s radius is a universal property, and consistent results across different approaches enhance credibility.”

Understanding proton size is vital for refining theories about potential new particles, as noted by Yost. The recent MPQ experiment has accurately tested existing theories, such as quantum electrodynamics, with a precision of 0.5 parts per million. Although no discrepancies with predicted outcomes emerged, the research lays the groundwork for future explorations in particle physics.

While high-energy colliders seek heavier particles, these precise hydrogen atom studies interrogate for lighter, hidden particles. “With a clearer understanding of proton size, we can now ask, what constraints can we establish for new physics?” concludes Yost.

Topics:

  • particle physics/
  • quantum physics

Source: www.newscientist.com

Exploring the Universe: Unlocking Fundamental Quantum Secrets Yet to be Discovered

Conceptual diagram of quantum fluctuations

We May Never Know the Universal Wave Function

Victor de Schwanberg/Science Photo Library/Getty Images

From the perspective of quantum physics, the universe may be fundamentally agnostic in some respects.

In quantum physics, every object, such as an electron, corresponds to a mathematical entity known as a wave function. This wave function encodes all details regarding an object’s quantum state. By combining the wave function with other equations, physicists can effectively predict the behavior of objects in experiments.

If we accept that the entire universe operates on quantum principles, then even larger entities, including the cosmos itself, must possess a wave function. This perspective has been supported by iconic physicists like Stephen Hawking.

However, researchers like Eddie Kemin Chen from the University of California, San Diego and Roderich Tumulka from the University of Tübingen in Germany, have demonstrated that complete knowledge of the universal wave function may be fundamentally unattainable.

“The cosmic wave function is like a cosmic secret that physics itself conspires to protect. We can predict a lot about how the universe behaves, yet we remain fundamentally unsure of its precise quantum state,” states Chen.

Previous studies assumed specific forms for the universal wave function based on theoretical models of the universe, overlooking the implications of experimental observations. Chen and Tumulka began with a more practical inquiry: Can observations help in identifying the correct wave function among those that reasonably describe our universe?

The researchers utilized mathematical outcomes from quantum statistical mechanics, which examines the properties of collections of quantum states. A significant factor in their calculations was the realization that the universal wave function depends on numerous parameters and exists in a high-dimensional abstract state.

Remarkably, upon completing their calculations, they found that universal quantum states are essentially agnostic.

“The measurements permissible by the rules of quantum mechanics provide very limited insight into the universe’s wave function. Determining the wave function of the universe with significant precision is impossible,” explains Tumulka.

Professor JB Manchak from the University of California, Irvine states that this research enhances our understanding of the limits of our best empirical methods, noting that we essentially have an equivalent to general relativity within the framework of quantum physics. He adds that this should not come as a surprise since quantum theory was not originally designed as a comprehensive theory of the universe.

“The wave function of a small system or the entire universe is a highly theoretical construct. Wave functions are meaningful not because they are observable, but because we employ them,” remarks Sheldon Goldstein from Rutgers University. He further explains that the inability to pinpoint a unique, accurate universal wave function from a limited range of candidates may not be problematic, as any of these functions could yield similar effects in future calculations.

Chen expresses hope to connect his and Tumulka’s research with the exploration of large-scale systems smaller than the universe itself, especially through techniques like shadow tomography, which aim to determine the quantum state of such systems. However, the philosophical consequences of their work are equally crucial. Tumulka emphasizes the need for caution against over-relying on positivist views that deem non-experimental statements as meaningless or unscientific. “Some truths are real, but cannot be measured,” he asserts.

This rationale might influence ongoing debates regarding the interpretation of quantum mechanics. According to Emily Adlam from Chapman University in California, the new findings advocate for incorporating more components into the interpretation of quantum equations, such as wave functions, emphasizing the relationship between quantum objects and individual observer perspectives, moving away from the assumption of a singular objective reality dictated by a single mathematical construct.

Topic:

This revised content is SEO-optimized with relevant keywords and better formatting for improved readability and search engine visibility.

Source: www.newscientist.com

Internet Access Should Be Recognized as a Fundamental Human Right

In 2024, 2.6 billion people (nearly a third of the global population) were still offline, as reported by
The International Telecommunication Union (ITU). That same year,
Freedom House estimated that over three-quarters of those with internet access live in countries where individuals have been arrested for sharing political, social, or religious content online, with nearly two-thirds of global internet users experiencing some form of online censorship.

The accessibility and quality of internet connections significantly impact how individuals lead their lives, a fact that deserves serious consideration. Having free and unobstructed internet access is no longer merely a luxury.

Human rights ensure a baseline of decent living conditions, as established by the UN General Assembly in the 1948 Declaration. In today’s digital landscape, the exercise of these rights—ranging from free speech to access to primary education—depends heavily on internet connectivity. For instance, many essential public services are transitioning online, and in several areas, digital services are the most viable alternatives to the absence of physical banks, educational institutions, and healthcare facilities.

Given the critical significance of internet access today, it must be officially recognized as a standalone human right by the United Nations and national governments. Such recognition would provide legal backing and obligations for international support that are often missing at the state level.

The ITU projects that achieving universal broadband coverage by 2030 will require an investment of nearly $428 billion. While this is a substantial sum, the benefits of connecting the remaining portion of humanity—enhanced education, economic activity, and health outcomes—far outweigh the costs.

Ensuring a minimum standard of connectivity is already an attainable goal. This includes providing 4G mobile broadband coverage, consistent access to smartphones, and affordable data plans for individuals that cost less than 2% of the average national income for 2GB per person, along with opportunities to develop essential digital skills.

However, having internet access alone is not sufficient for upholding human rights. As highlighted by the United Nations, misuse of technology for monitoring populations, gathering personal data for profit maximization, or spreading misinformation constitutes oppression rather than empowerment.

This right entails that states should respect users’ privacy, opposing censorship and the manipulation of information online. Businesses should prioritize human rights, especially users’ privacy, and actively combat misinformation and abuse on their platforms in line with regulations governing social media.

In 2016, the United Nations affirmed that people must be protected online just as they are offline. This concept was first suggested in
2003.

The time to act is now. Advocating for universal internet access as a human right calls for political action. We cannot afford to see the internet degrade from a tool for human advancement to one of division. Establishing this right will be a powerful measure to ensure that the internet serves the interests of all, not just a select few.

Merten Reglitz is a philosopher and author of Free Internet Access as a Human Right

Topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Chimpanzees Share “Fundamental Elements of Musical Rhythms” with Humans

Young Chimpanzee Drumming in Guinea

Cyril Ruoso/Naturepl.com

Musicality may have originated from a shared ancestor of chimpanzees and humans, given the similarities in their drumming techniques.

Katherine Hoheiter at The University of St Andrews and her research team analyzed 371 instances of drumming from two of the four subspecies of chimpanzees in Africa: Western chimpanzees (Pantroglogistics Vers) and Eastern chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes schweinfurthi).

They utilize their hands and feet, often on buttress roots, creating rapid rhythms mainly during rest, travel, or during displays of threat.

Hoheiter mentions that while capturing chimpanzee drumming is common, the rainforest poses significant research challenges, and gathering data for some populations took decades.

Ultimately, researchers found that chimpanzees drum significantly faster than most humans. “The longest drumming event we recorded exceeded five seconds, while the shortest was less than 0.1 seconds,” notes Hoheiter. “Chimpanzees also tend to repeat these beats, especially while traveling.”

Despite the contrasts between chimpanzee and human drumming, chimpanzees exhibit some “core components of human musical rhythms,” according to team member Vesta Eleuteri from the University of Vienna.

“They employ recognizable rhythms present in various musical cultures, which contrasts with randomly played beats. These consist of hits that are evenly spaced, akin to clock ticks,” she elaborates. “Moreover, we discovered that the Eastern and Western chimpanzee subspecies, residing on different sides of Africa, exhibit distinct rhythmic patterns.”

Eleuteri explains that Eastern chimpanzees alternate between short and long intervals between beats, while Western chimpanzees maintain equally spaced hits. Additionally, these chimpanzees initiate drumming more quickly and use more hits to commence drumming early during a unique pant-hoot call.

Miguel Rulente from the University of Girona finds the notion that different subspecies display unique drumming styles compelling. “These patterns suggest the potential for not just individual idiosyncrasies but also cultural distinctions in how groups utilize drumming as communication tools.”

It is well understood that rhythm plays a crucial role in human social interaction, whether through music, dance, or even conversational rhythms, explains Hoheiter. “I’m not implying that chimpanzee drumming reflects the sophistication of modern human rhythms. However, this research is the first to show that we share fundamental rhythmic elements, suggesting that rhythms are intrinsic to our social environment even before we evolved into humans.”

“Previously, it was claimed that rhythmicity was exclusive to humans,” states Gisela Kaplan from the University of New England. “However, a growing body of evidence suggests this is not the case.”

Topics:

Source: www.newscientist.com