New Evidence Suggests Life May Not Have Begun on Earth: Discover What Changed Experts’ Minds

If you’ve been closely following developments in space science, you may have heard about the groundbreaking discovery of DNA’s building blocks on an asteroid. This is a crucial finding for understanding the origins of life.

The latest findings stem from the carbon-rich near-Earth asteroid Ryugu, which was explored by JAXA’s Hayabusa2 spacecraft, returning samples to Earth in 2020.

A recent study published in Nature Astronomy confirms that all five standard nucleobases—the molecular “letters” that encode genetic information in DNA and RNA—are present in these samples.

This finding, combined with similar discoveries from asteroid Bennu and the Murchison meteorite, suggests a broader pattern rather than isolated incidents.

Genetic Letters Etched in Space

Nucleobases are nitrogen-rich molecules that hold genetic information. The five primary nucleobases—adenine, guanine, cytosine, thymine, and uracil—pair together along the backbone of DNA and RNA, encoding the instructions necessary for life. Without these nucleobases, life as we know it could not exist.

While the presence of these molecules on an asteroid doesn’t imply life existed there, it does indicate that the chemistry needed to create essential biological ingredients occurs naturally in the universe, a process called abiotic synthesis.

“The important point is that nucleobases formed naturally on primitive asteroids and may be widely distributed across the solar system,” explains Dr. Toshiki Koga, a postdoctoral fellow at the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC) and the lead author of this study.

The discovery of life’s building blocks in meteorites usually raises concerns about contamination from Earth’s biology. For instance, the presence of organic molecules near a meteorite can complicate interpretations of its origin.

The solution lies in studying the asteroids directly. The Hayabusa2 mission collected samples in space and, before returning to Earth, sealed them in a clean room under an inert gas atmosphere.

“The samples were collected in space and sealed to avoid exposure to Earth’s environment,” Koga states, emphasizing that all analytical processes were conducted under strict contamination controls.

Similarly, NASA’s OSIRIS-REx mission returned samples from asteroid Bennu in 2023, which also contained all five nucleobases.

The Hayabusa2 spacecraft visited asteroid Ryugu on June 27, 2018, and collected 5.4g of samples before returning to Earth in December 2020 – Photo credit: JAXA

Analyzing Chemical Ratios

The Ryugu study offers more than just confirmation of previously expected results; it provides insights into the varying chemical compositions of different asteroids.

Different space rocks exhibit varying proportions of two classes of nucleobases: purines (adenine and guanine, which have a two-ring structure) and pyrimidines (cytosine, thymine, and uracil, which have a simpler single-ring structure).

The Murchison meteorite is rich in purines, Bennu predominantly contains pyrimidines, while Ryugu falls somewhere in between.

Researchers found a strong correlation between the ratio of purines to pyrimidines and the levels of ammonia in each sample. Higher ammonia levels correspond to an increase in pyrimidines, implying a shared yet environmentally sensitive formation pathway.

“By comparing the nucleobase compositions of Ryugu, Bennu, and the meteorite, we have uncovered evidence for a potentially new formation mechanism,” Koga notes, with laboratory experiments underway for further investigation.

Rethinking the Origins of Life

According to Critie Grice, a Professor of Geochemistry at Curtin University who was not involved in the study, the accumulating evidence suggests a shift in our understanding of life’s origins.

“Life did not originate from scratch on Earth; the molecules necessary for life, such as nucleobases, may have formed in space and been delivered to Earth very early on,” she explains.

This reframing of the origin of life narrative suggests that rather than questioning how life produced its essential chemistry on a young Earth, we should consider how Earth organized existing molecular tools into replicating, evolving systems.

In this model, Earth acts more as an assembly line than a chemical laboratory.

The essential ingredients for nucleobase production—carbon, nitrogen, water, and radiation—are abundant throughout the universe.

The chemical processes in molecular clouds and primitive asteroids are common to planetary formation, reinforcing that the chemistry we observe is not unique to our solar system.

“The essential ingredients are widespread in the universe; the processes we’re discussing are foundational to planetary formation,” Grice states.

Large particles collected from asteroid Ryugu during Hayabusa2’s second touchdown, ranging from 3mm to over 10mm – Photo credit: JAXA

If the molecular precursors of life tend to form where planets develop, then the question of life spreading throughout the universe shifts from whether these ingredients exist to whether the conditions for their utilization will ever arise.

However, it’s essential to clarify that nucleobases themselves are not DNA or life forms. Transitioning from nucleobases to self-replicating molecules that can undergo Darwinian evolution requires the presence of sugars, phosphates, water, and potentially a bit of luck.

Moreover, some molecules carried by asteroids can disintegrate upon atmospheric entry, potentially preventing them from reaching concentrations that foster life.

Nonetheless, the patterns emerging from studies of Ryugu, Bennu, and various meteorite analyses are astonishing.

Approximately 4.6 billion years ago, as the solar system took shape, the basic materials for genetics were likely already being synthesized in cosmic rocks floating between planets.

Understanding how these components were assembled and whether similar processes could occur elsewhere in the universe remains one of science’s most critical open questions.

What we can confidently assert is that there has never been a shortage of essential materials for life.

Read more:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Understanding Neuroscience: Why It Can’t Teach Us to Control People’s Minds

KH FUN/Science Photo Library

Our brains naturally favor shortcuts, often leading to subconscious decisions. This is part of the brain’s tendency to minimize energy consumption. This inclination may explain our deep interest in categorizing brain states despite their inherent complexities.

Consider the varying legal ages of adulthood worldwide, ranging from 16 to 21 years. This distinction is crucial, as it influences societal expectations for children versus adults. Some advocate for a paradigm shift, urging lawmakers to account for typical brain maturation, assessed through methods like brain imaging, when addressing matters such as criminal sentencing and driving privileges. While many believe that brain development isn’t complete until age 25, our analysis in the dedicated feature on brain changes reveals that this notion is misleading. Brain maturation occurs at diverse rates, and numerous assessment methods exist.

Neuroscience is also being harnessed to shape policies before the science is fully validated. For instance, the introduction of “severe autism” aims to identify individuals requiring the most support by evaluating IQ, language abilities, and care needs. While this can enhance resource allocation, it risks marginalizing those who don’t meet stringent criteria. It is important to consider the distinct profiles of individuals with language and cognitive impairments, as these neurological differences necessitate tailored support.

Neuroscience is often called upon to shape policy before the science is adequately established

Concerns also arise around the use of psychological profiling in judicial settings. When mental health issues are presented as mitigating factors, mental illness can complicate legal proceedings. Aggressive prosecution may lead to even greater challenges, making it dangerous to treat mental health conditions as definitive facts rather than an evolving understanding. Recent studies indicate that while these factors may bear legal relevance, they cannot always be confidently applied.

Our collective urge to neatly categorize the brain is understandable, and a future where neuroscience effectively helps us decipher cognitive states is conceivable. However, that future has not yet materialized.

Source: www.newscientist.com

The Human Mind’s Aversion to Uncertainty: A Challenge for Liberal Democracies

The exploration of the dynamics within liberal democracies has typically emphasized economic, emotional, and educational influences. However, an additional field of neurology plays a critical role.

Liberal democracies engage our cognitive processes differently than authoritarian regimes. Dictatorships provide a sense of predictability, exemplified by Adolf Hitler’s envisioned timeline, while liberal democracies leave the future open to our choices, presenting it as a canvas we shape ourselves.

This is politically significant yet cognitively daunting. Historically, the future was dictated by a select few, prioritizing preservation over progress. The inherent ambiguity and adaptability of liberal democracy can challenge individuals neurologically, as uncertainty is a state the human mind often resists. Studies indicate that uncertainty triggers more anxiety than the anticipation of an electric shock, leading to various historical attempts to diminish uncertainty through mechanisms like insurance and weather forecasting.

Your position on the spectrum of uncertainty tolerance is influenced by cultural background, age, and gender, as well as neurological factors. Research in political neuroscience reveals that conservative brains lean towards security, generally steering clear of conclusions that lack clarity. This tendency is associated with a larger amygdala, the brain region linked to threat detection, resulting in a heightened discomfort when confronted with the unfamiliar.

On the other hand, a liberal brain exhibits greater gray matter in the anterior cingulate cortex, a region involved in processing ambiguity. This anatomical difference enables liberals to tolerate uncertainty and confrontation more effectively. Liberal democracies can provide space for both perspectives under less stressful conditions. Although conservatives and liberals may have distinct neural predispositions regarding their preferences for the future, evolutionarily, all humans share the ability to envision multiple futures.

However, increased uncertainty can push some individuals beyond their comfort zones, particularly as the future of pressing issues—like environmental change, technology, and social norms—becomes less predictable. To cope with this anxiety, some individuals gravitate towards populist and authoritarian political leaders, committing to rigid decision-making and a black-and-white perspective. They often seek certainty—howbeit a mere illusion—by rejecting innovations (such as medical advancements) or dismissing foreign cultures and religions, thus limiting uncertainty and suppressing potential futures. This obsession with ambiguity and anxiety can create a more tranquil mindset for those affected.

This doesn’t imply a total surrender to an illiberal mindset. Instead, it underscores the necessity for liberal democracies to candidly inform their constituents that embracing liberalism may not come intuitively. Educational initiatives, public discourse, and civil engagement must derive insights into overcoming illiberal tendencies at a brain-based level.

We must communicate the collective benefits of cooperation in various domains, including identity. Ultimately, only through collaboratively addressing the vulnerabilities inherent in our brains can we tackle the significant global challenges we face today.

Florence Gaub is the author of Future: Manual (Hurst, 2026). Riya Yu has authored Fragile Minds: The Neuropolitics of Divided Societies (Columbia UP).

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

When Radio Waves Illuminate Our Minds, We Experience Smell.

Preserving a keen sense of smell has multiple benefits, notably for our ability to taste.

DeanDrobot/Getty Images

Directly applying strong radio waves to an individual’s head appears to enhance the sense of smell, at least for a limited time.

Aging, trauma, and certain neurological disorders can impact the olfactory nerves, potentially diminishing the ability to smell. Many individuals have reported a reduced sense of smell following Covid-19, which can adversely affect personal preferences and may pose safety risks, such as an inability to detect gas leaks.

“Current medical practices may include surgical interventions for severe olfactory dysfunction, but more typical cases rely on chemical treatments, such as repeated exposure to scents at home,” explains Yong Woo-chan from Gang Line University in Seoul. “While treatments in other medical fields have advanced significantly, olfactory treatment has remained relatively traditional. To address this gap, we proposed the idea of electrical testing through bioelectronic stimulation as a therapeutic option.”

Chang and his team aimed to stimulate the olfactory system directly; however, due to its location deep within the head, they opted for radio wave stimulation instead.

The researchers initially engaged 28 participants without any odor issues. The participants were exposed to 15 watts of power for 5 minutes, emitted from a 5 cm square antenna positioned 10 cm from their heads. “The stimulus itself is not consciously felt by the patient,” states Chan. “However, with prolonged exposure, some might notice a slight warming sensation at the stimulation site.”

The olfactory sensitivity was assessed using standard tests like the Sniffin’ Sticks odor threshold test. This involved participants working to identify the presence of alcohol N-butanol produced from fermented sugar at varying dilutions.

Following the radiofrequency treatment, researchers observed that participants demonstrated significantly improved olfactory function, with these enhancements lasting approximately a week. Individuals with olfactory challenges may require additional treatments, according to Chan.

The research team is currently preparing studies involving individuals with smell disorders. The device has been refined to deliver more intense stimulation, which could potentially lead to even greater improvements, according to Jang.

Topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Thom Yorke and Julianne Moore team up with AI to connect with creative minds

Abba’s Bjorn Ulvaeus, actor Julianne Moore, Radiohead singer Thom Yorke and others have expressed concerns to artificial intelligence companies regarding the unauthorized use of their work, stating that it poses a “serious and unwarranted threat” to artists’ livelihoods. They are part of a group of 10,500 individuals who have signed a statement from the creative industry as a warning.

This issue arises amidst a legal dispute between creative professionals and technology companies over the use of copyrighted material to train AI models like ChatGPT. The argument being made is that using intellectual property without permission is a violation of copyright and artists’ rights.

The statement emphasizes the detrimental impact of unauthorized use of creative works on the livelihood of creators and advocates against allowing it. Notable individuals across literature, music, film, theater, and television have lent their support to this cause.

The statement was organized by British composer and former AI executive Ed Newton Rex, who highlighted the significant concern for individuals dependent on their creative endeavors for a living.

Newton-Rex outlined the key resources required by generative AI companies to build AI models, emphasizing the need for obtaining training data legally and not exploiting copyrighted content without proper permissions.

He also criticized the notion of calling copyright material “training data,” stating that it devalues the creative effort put into writing, art, music, and other forms of artistic expression.

The statement resonates with creators who have faced legal battles with AI companies over copyright infringement, including prominent writers and music industry entities.

Newton-Rex further cautioned against proposals for an “opt-out” system for content scraping in the UK, citing potential harm to creators who may not be aware of such mechanisms.

He suggested that an opt-in system would be more equitable for creators, rather than placing the burden of opting out on individuals undergoing AI training.

The statement received support from various organizations and companies in the creative sector, highlighting the collective concern over copyright issues in the digital age.

Overall, the statement and its signatories underscore the need for careful consideration of copyright laws and fair treatment of creators in the evolving landscape of AI technology.

Source: www.theguardian.com

The Genius Minds of QI Present an Olympic-Quality Quiz Show | Podcast

pictureEarlier this week, my colleague Archie Brand from First Edition enthusiastically recommended the In the Dark podcast to me. For me, the show is a hit investigative show that was acquired by Conde Nast/The New Yorker last year, but I never actually listened to the podcast or its acclaimed second season. Curtis Flowers was put on trial six times for the same murder. At least I thought I hadn’t listened to the podcast; I had, in fact, watched the spinoff miniseries about the Dubai royal family’s grievances. The runaway princesses – I read it back in January and didn’t realize it was part of a larger true crime documentary series (maybe I’m stupid and was confused by the huge font size for “Runaway Princesses” and the tiny font size for “From In the Dark”).

Runaway Princess didn’t wow me, but I’m still intrigued by the show. Like Serial, the show has broken away from the glut of true-crime documentaries and been acquired by one of the journalism giants. It returns to the air for a third full season this week, with Madeline Baran investigating the infamous 2005 murder of 24 unarmed Iraqi civilians by U.S. Marines and asking why justice wasn’t served. The first two episodes are out now.

Read on for this week’s picks, including a new series from comedian Jessica Knappett (taking an Off Menu-esque route with a podcast about celebrities’ perfect days) and an Olympics-related release from the team behind QI and No Such Thing as a Fish. And you can always email us at newsletters@theguardian.com with your thoughts, suggestions, comments or, like Archie, recommendations for the Hear Here team.

Hannah J. Davis
Newsletter Deputy Editor

This week’s picks

Reg Yates has revived his eponymous podcast after a four-year hiatus. Photo: Katherine Ann Rose/Observer

A Perfect Day with Jessica Knappett
Widely available, with weekly episodes

Comedian Jessica Knappett invites celebrity friends to talk about their day-to-day lives. First up is her “Avoidance” co-star Romesh Ranganathan, who talks about having a garbage truck named after him and interviewing 50 Cent. Knappett then shifts the conversation to a “Magic Mike Live” journey, giving the podcast a charming, rambling framework. Upcoming guests include Baby Reindeer’s Jessica Gunning and Saltburn director Emerald Fennell. Hannah Verdier

Late to the party
Widely available, with weekly episodes
Always a worthwhile interview, Katherine Ryan makes…

Source: www.theguardian.com

How Our Minds Control Impulses: A Fresh Perspective

In a groundbreaking study, researchers identified the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) as important in the brain’s inhibitory control circuits. Using dynamic causal modeling and fMRI in 250 participants, this study found high connectivity in this circuit that was influenced by gender and performance. The findings reveal hemispheric asymmetries and sex-related differences in brain processes and provide insights that may improve treatment strategies for psychiatric and neurological disorders associated with response inhibition.

Researchers have discovered a critical role for the right inferior frontal gyrus in the brain’s inhibitory control, revealing implications for the treatment of gender differences and related diseases.

Published in Volume 3 in 2023 psychoradiology A team of dedicated researchers from the University of Hong Kong and the University of Electronic Science and Technology of China has conclusively identified the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG) as a key input and causal regulator within the subcortical response inhibition node. This right-lateralized inhibitory control circuit is characterized by its important intrinsic connectivity, highlighting the critical role of rIFG in coordinating top-down cortico-subcortical control and supporting the brain in response inhibition. It emphasizes the complex dynamics of function.

Advanced research methods and results

In this comprehensive study, researchers used dynamic causal modeling (DCM-PEB) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), a substantial sample size to investigate inhibitory circuits in the brain, with a particular focus on the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG), caudate nucleus (rCau), globus pallidus (rGP), and thalamus (rThal). (n = 250). This approach treated the brain as a nonlinear dynamical system and enabled the inference of directed causal relationships between these nodes, influenced by task demands and biological variables.

Brain activation map of general response inhibition at the whole-brain level (control: NoGo > Go; P < 0.05 FWE, peak level). L, left. Mr. R, that’s right. The color bar represents the t-value of the BOLD signal and reflects the significance level of the contrast.Credit: Psychoradiology

Our findings reveal high intrinsic connectivity within this neural circuit, with response inhibition markedly enhancing causal projections from rIFG to both rCau and rThal, particularly in the regulatory role of rIFG during such tasks. It has become clear that the role will be expanded. This study also revealed that gender and performance metrics significantly influence the functional architecture of the circuit. For example, females showed increased self-inhibition of rThal and decreased regulation to GP, whereas better inhibitory performance was associated with stronger transmission from rThal to rIFG.

Sex differences and hemispheric asymmetry

Interestingly, these communication patterns are not reflected in the left-lateralized model, which emphasizes hemispheric asymmetry. This study shows that different brain processes may mediate similar behavioral performance in response inhibition across genders, and that response inhibition may be higher in the thalamic loop in particular. Accuracy Associated with stronger information flow from rThal to rIFG.

(a) Location of the region included in the right model. A matrix: Intrinsic connectivity across all experimental conditions (b, f). B matrix: modulatory effects on effective connectivity between regions and self-inhibition from NoGo (c, g) and Go conditions (d, h). C matrix: Driving ROI inputs (e, i) in NoGo and Go conditions. The values ​​in the matrix reflect the connection parameters.Credit: Psychoradiology

Impact and future directions

These insights into the brain’s inhibitory control mechanisms have important implications for understanding a variety of psychiatric and neurological disorders characterized by response inhibition deficits. The results of this study may guide the development of targeted neuromodulatory strategies and personalized interventions to address these disorders, enhancing the treatment and management of such conditions..

Reference: “Right inferior frontal gyrus as an effective regulator of the cardinal node and basal ganglia thalamocortical response inhibition circuit” Qian Zhuang, Lei Qiao, Lei Xu, Shuxia Yao, Shuaiyu Chen, Xiaoxiao Zheng, Jialin Li, Meina Fu, Keshuang Lee, Deniz Vatancevar, Stefania Ferraro, Keith M. Kendrick, Benjamin Becker, October 13, 2023. psychoradiology.
DOI: 10.1093/psyrad/kkad016

Source: scitechdaily.com