Exploring the Female Homo Naledi Skeletons: Insights and Discoveries

Homo naledi skull

Homo naledi Skull

Peter Van Evert/Alamy

The Homo naledi discovery in a South African cave over thirteen years ago has revealed astonishing insights. Recent analyses of skeletal proteins suggest all samples examined were female, providing potentially the most compelling evidence of early human behavior yet.

Uncovered by a group of cavers in 2013 within the Rising Star cave system, approximately 40 kilometers northwest of Johannesburg, the fossils were situated in deep, hard-to-reach chambers. Since their discovery, researchers have tirelessly investigated how these remains came to rest in such a location.

Initial hypotheses emerged in 2015, proposing that H. naledi corpses were intentionally placed in the cave, as suggested by Lee Berger from the University of the Witwatersrand. Archaeological findings indicated potential grave digging within the cave and the use of torches to navigate the darkness, with claims of ancient rock paintings left behind in this burial space. However, these ideas have been met with skepticism.

The latest findings by Palesa Madupe at the University of Copenhagen involved extracting ancient proteins from H. naledi tooth enamel, enabling insights into the genetics of this long-extinct species, believed to have lived between 335,000 and 236,000 years ago.

Tooth enamel comprises around a dozen proteins, relatively understudied in evolutionary terms. However, certain proteins can reveal biological sex due to the presence of amelogenin proteins linked to X and Y chromosomes, with females typically containing only the X-linked (amelogenin A) allele.

Madupe and her team examined all 23 known H. naledi specimens and successfully identified amelogenin proteins in 20, all of which were female—a startling outcome. Madupe expressed initial concerns about potential errors in their analysis, yet repeated tests yielded the same result, leading researchers to ponder the absence of male specimens.

One explanation could be the rapid degradation of AMELY proteins, making some undetectable. However, Madupe suggests this is unlikely, especially considering that similar proteins dating back two million years were recently discovered in South African excavations.

Lee Berger at the Rising Star Cave Entrance

Luca Sola/AFP via Getty Images

Another theory suggests that H. naledi males might not express AMELY genes on their enamel. Examining existing literature, researchers note that such deletions can occur in current human populations, though infrequently. They calculated the likelihood of AMELY absence among a random sample of 20 individuals, positing that the odds would be exceedingly low at just 0.0000954 percent.

This points to one intriguing conclusion: all 20 fossilized remains could have belonged to females. Berger argues this indicates that the notion of a natural process leading to their arrival in the cave is untenable. Instead, he posits that the findings imply intentional placement of female corpses within the cave.

Many researchers support this conclusion. For instance, Emma Pomeroy from Cambridge University remarked, “This suggests either flawed analytical methods or intentional choices regarding H. naledi individuals.” Similarly, Bernard Wood from George Washington University hypothesizes there might be behavioral reasons behind why female remains were deposited in the cave.

Others remain more skeptical. Researcher Kimberly Fecke from George Mason University suggests cave access may have historically posed challenges for larger individuals, thus affecting the representation of males in the fossil record. Notably, the initial archaeologists who explored the cave were predominantly women.

In contrast, Michael Petraglia at Griffith University advocates the idea that social dynamics among H. naledi could have led to populations with higher female-to-male ratios for foraging activities.

However, other experts, like Eric Kruvezy from the University of Toulouse, express reservations about this theory, noting that in primate groups with uneven male-to-female ratios, one typically finds a balance of male and female infants. This discrepancy brings into question the potential for a largely female demographic in the cave.

Berger maintains that these findings bolster his hypothesis that H. naledi corpses were purposefully placed in the cave. Other researchers challenge this notion, with Wood asserting that simply placing a body in a rock crevice shouldn’t be equated with burial rituals, denying the existence of complex cultural beliefs in early hominins regarding mortality.

Finally, the pivotal question remains: what did H. naledi look like? Wood notes that while physiological traits can be surmised from female specimens, significant variation might be expected, especially considering other hominin species like Paranthropus boisei, where males displayed larger cranial features.

Topics:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Studies Indicate Diverse Hand Grips Used by Australopithecus sediba and Homo naledi

Australopithecus sediba – This small human species, which existed around 2 million years ago, displayed a blend of ape-like and human-like traits. Homona Lady – A recent study led by Dr. Samar Syeda from the American Museum of Natural History reveals that this newly identified species, dating back approximately 335,000 to 236,000 years, shows a distinct pattern of bone thickness, indicating diverse load applications and potential grip types.



A reconstruction depicting the life of Australopithecus sediba commissioned by the University of Michigan Museum of Natural History. Image credit: Elisabeth Daynes/S. Entressangle.

Dr. Syeda and her team explored variations in phalanx morphology, discovering that South African hominins might exhibit different dexterities along with varied climbing abilities.

They focused on two nearly complete fossil hand skeletons discovered in South Africa: the hands from Australopithecus sediba, dated at 2 million years old, and hand skeletons from the newly identified star cave system from 250,000 years ago.

While no direct associations with stone tools have been established for either species, certain aspects of their hand and wrist morphology imply a level of dexterity that aligns more closely with human hands than with those of chimpanzees and gorillas.

“Stone tools have been found in South Africa dating back at least 2.2 million years (and potentially as far back as 3.3 million years),” stated Dr. Tracy Kivell, a researcher at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology and Witwatersrand University. “Many primates are adept stone tool users, as are Australopithecus sediba and Homona Lady.

“However, the exact nature of their tool usage and interaction remains unclear.”

Furthermore, both Australopithecus sediba and Homona Lady exhibit ape-like characteristics, especially within their upper limb bones, which could be advantageous for climbing.

The ongoing debate in paleontology considers whether these traits indicate actual climbing behaviors or if they are simply evolutionary remnants from climbing ancestors.



Reconstruction of Homona Lady‘s head by artist John Gurche, who spent around 700 hours recreating it from a bone scan, published in collaboration with the University of Witwatersrand, the National Geographic Society, and the South African National Research Foundation in the journal Elife. Image credits: John Gurche / Mark Thiessen / National Geographic.

To explore these inquiries, researchers examined variations in the internal composition of the fingers (cortical bone) in both Australopithecus sediba and Homona Lady.

Bones are dynamic tissues that can modify their structure based on usage and loading throughout life, thickening in high load areas while thinning in regions subjected to lesser loads.

As such, variations in internal cortical thickness can shed light on how these two hominin fossils utilized their hands during their lifetimes.

“Our findings indicate that both Australopithecus sediba and Homona Lady exhibit a range of functional signals within the cortical bone structure of their fingers,” remarked Dr. Syeda.

In Australopithecus sediba, the distribution of cortical bones within the proximal and intermediate phalanges of most fingers closely resembles that of apes. However, the thumb and pinky bones are more akin to human bones.

“These two digits appear to represent potential functional signals because they experience less frequent or lower loads during climbing or suspension,” noted Dr. Syeda.

“Combining these findings with a human-like thumb suggests that Australopithecus sediba employed its hands not just for climbing, but also for tool use and other dexterous activities.”

Homona Lady, in contrast, displays an unusual pattern where the proximal phalanx (the bone supported by the palm) shows human-like traits, while the intermediate phalanx (the bone in the middle of the finger) reflects ape-like characteristics.



Fossil hands of Australopithecus sediba and Homona Lady indicating that these South African hominins may have exhibited varying degrees of dexterity and climbing proficiency. Image credit: Tracy Kivell.

“This distinct pattern was unexpected and suggests that Homona Lady may have engaged different parts of its fingers for varied loading,” Dr. Syeda noted.

This unique loading pattern resembles certain grip types observed today, such as crimp grips used by rock climbers, where the surface is primarily grasped by the tips of the fingers.

Homona Lady also features unusually curved phalanges, particularly notable since this species coexisted with early members of our own species, Homo sapiens, indicating potential usage of hands for climbing.

Further research is necessary to ascertain whether Homona Lady utilized crimp-like grips for climbing; however, it is evident that throughout human evolution, there has been an ongoing requirement for using tools with enhanced dexterity for food processing on trees and rocks within the ancient South African landscape.

“This research offers greater evidence that human evolution is characterized by various ‘experiments’ balancing the demands of manipulation and movement within these historical environments, rather than a straightforward transition from upright walking to increasingly advanced tool use,” Dr. Kivell stated.

Survey results will be published this week in the journal Advances in Science.

____

Samar M. Syeda et al. 2025. Bone distribution in the Faranjour cortex reveals variations in dexterity and climbing behaviors in Australopithecus sediba and Homona Lady. Advances in Science 11 (20); doi:10.1126/sciadv.adt1201

Source: www.sci.news