The White House to Replace Covid Resources Page with Lab Leak Website

Visitors to Covid.gov, a federal website previously dedicated to Covid Resources, were met with a significant change on Friday.

The page now redirects to the White House Website, which proposes that Covid originated in a laboratory in Wuhan, China before spreading to humans. This “lab leak theory” gained traction early in the pandemic and has since gained popularity among some right-wing media and conservative politicians.

Whitehouse.gov

Prior to this change, covid.gov served as a platform to provide information on Covid vaccines, treatments, tests, and long-term effects. The website assisted users in locating pharmacies and community health centers for Covid-related services including testing, medical consultations, and medications.

Its companion site, Covidtests.gov, allowed individuals to order free Covid tests for home delivery. Both sites now redirect to the White House Lab Leak website.

White House spokesperson Kaelan Dole emphasized transparency, innovation, and protection in a statement, citing the Trump administration’s commitment to these values in contrast to previous administrations.

The new website draws heavily from a House of Representatives report released in December. This report suggested that Covid likely originated from a laboratory or research-related accident, based on a two-year investigation by a Republican-led subcommittee on the coronavirus pandemic.

Established in 2020 under Democratic control, the subcommittee initially scrutinized the Trump administration’s pandemic response. After Republicans gained a House majority in early 2023, the focus shifted towards investigating the lab leak theory and the efficacy of vaccine and mask mandates.

A separate December report from House Democrats contradicted the Republican findings, stating it did not definitively determine the virus’s origins or how it crossed to humans. The report acknowledged the possibility of lab leaks but also suggested natural transmission from animals as a potential source.

Both the Republican report and the White House website accuse Dr. Anthony Fauci, former director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, of suppressing the lab leak theory. However, Democrats view these attacks as unfounded and politically motivated.

Several independent scientists argue against the lab leak theory, favoring natural zoonotic spillover events as the likely origin of the virus. These findings align with a survey of 168 scientists conducted by a nonpartisan think tank last year.

Similarly, a 2023 article in the New England Journal of Medicine concluded that the most scientifically supported scenario for the virus’s emergence is natural spillover from animals. The article highlighted the political entanglement of the issue and the likelihood that the true origin may remain elusive.

In 2023, a declassified report by the Director of National Intelligence acknowledged the plausibility of both lab leaks and natural animal origins. While the CIA expressed “low confidence” in favor of a lab leak in January, the conclusion remains uncertain.

The closure of covid.gov by the Trump administration coincides with significant budget cuts to Covid-related programs, including an $11.4 billion reduction in CDC funding and the discontinuation of NIH Covid research grants. This includes a $577 million initiative for developing oral antiviral drugs against potential pandemic pathogens.

The administration justified these cuts by asserting that “the pandemic is over,” according to a closing letter reviewed by NBC News.

Source: www.nbcnews.com

Curious about the end of the world? Check out this Wikipedia page on the topic

tHe’s the way the world ends: not with bangs, but… rounded? According to my favorite Wikipedia wormhole, it is the number of possible ways our universe can bite about 100 quin desirion (give or take several losses) into a bullet a few years from now. It’s just one.

To me, Wikipedia looks harmless A distant future timeline Page (along with its existentially miserable nature, The ultimate fate of the universe) The perfect encapsulation of the built-in dissonance of the Internet is monolithic in meaning, but in its presentation it is very pedestrian. It provides a heart-warming snapshot of scientific theory wrapped in boring color-coded spreadsheets. Catalogs the theoretical extinction of Y chromosomes five million years later.

Every year human history has its own dedicated Wikipedia page, 719BC (When Zhou Huan Wang clearly didn’t happen much other than becoming the ruler of China). Although nature has younger years than others, these pages generally provide useful TLs of major world events, famous births and deaths, astronomical phenomena.

However, if you scroll through the 2020s, you will see that 2026, 2027, 2028 and more continue. The cleverly dull Wikipedia interface remains unchanged in the cedees of recorded history Speculative history.

The audience at John Cage’s performance was as late as possible. This is scheduled to begin in 2001 and close in 2640. Photo: Markus Schreiber/AP

It is possible to surf Wikipedia in the very distant future. Each page provides the best guesses of the current year, ten years, century, or the millennium may have. In 2029, “Digital Time Capsule “Message from Earth” reaches the destination of Earth’s Gliese 581c.” In 2085, “Queen Elizabeth II’s “Secret” letter will be opened in Sydney.” In 2140, “It is expected that all of the approximately 21 million Bitcoins will be mined.”

It was a troubling combination of asteroid near misses, severe climate catastrophes, strange geopolitics, until around the 24th century, when he had the same surname in 2531, a “negative bear-spot paradox” in 2353. is. “John Cage’s organ’s performance in 639 will be as slow as possible,” he said in 2640.

It’s been a while since the movie was 2012. Will the world end up with “a big freeze, a big crunch, a big bounce, a big rift, or actually a big round lup?” Photo: Sony/Sportsphoto/Allstar

From there, all roads lead to a timeline of the distant future. Here we see the explosive red hyper-illusions that appear in the daytime sky, the addition of daily moments on Earth, planetary collisions, ocean evaporation, space-time singularities, pyramidal erosion, Mars terra formation, black holes, Boltzmann’s You can learn about brain erosion of the brain. The final ending ext of JavaScript (time of death: 275,760 September 13th).

Truly adventurous people can delve deeper into the ultimate fate of the universe, which reads like a tasting menu to completely disappear. Is it a big freeze, a big crunch, a big bounce, a big rift, or actually a big round thing?

Wikipedia, like other encyclopedias, was not designed to induce emotions, but the pure spiritual weight of the information made me feel a bit of awe-inspiring. It may not be possible. When I read these completely benign “Astro Engineering Project” and “Femtosecond Laser Etched Nanostructures”, I feel my little human brain stabbing against the limits of that imagination You can do it.

Some people have explained that they are in a small mood in honor, looking up at the stars on a sunny night. Scrolling through these Wikipedia pages and reading history before it happens, I get the same feeling. My little desk, my little keyboard is doing my little work, and my head is in the world where future archaeologists identify the “urban strata” of fossilized coastal cities I’m trying to wrap it around. Next, close all browser tabs and compete for Pilates.

Source: www.theguardian.com