Unleashing Imagination: Bonobo’s Enchanting Pretend Tea Party

Kanzi the bonobo

Kanzi the Bonobo, 43 Years Old

Ape Initiative

Bonobos, our closest primate relatives, showcased remarkable social behavior by participating in a pretend tea party, revealing their capacity for deception.

Kanzi the bonobo (Pan paniscus), born in the United States in 1980, passed away at the age of 44 in March of last year. He spent the majority of his life at the Ape Initiative in Des Moines, Iowa, where he became renowned for his ability to communicate by pointing to symbols on a communication board.

In the year leading up to his death, Amalia Bastos and her team at the University of St. Andrews in the UK conducted a series of experiments to examine whether Kanzi, alongside his exceptional language abilities, could engage in what researchers term “secondary representation.” This cognitive skill encompasses the ability to conceive alternate realities and occasionally share these pretenses with others, akin to early human development.

Bastos explains that children, by ages 2 or 3, can mentally track the imaginary flow of liquids between containers, discerning where the “tea” is located. “This was exactly the scenario we devised to assess Kanzi’s cognitive abilities in non-human animals.”

During the initial stage of the experiment, researchers pretended to pour imaginary juice into two empty cups, then pretended to empty one cup and asked Kanzi which cup he preferred. Remarkably, he selected the cup that he believed still contained the fictional juice more than two-thirds of the time.

Bastos notes, “If Kanzi hadn’t conceived of the ‘imaginary juice’ during the experiment, he would have selected one of the two empty cups by chance.”

In the second phase, the researchers placed one empty cup and one filled with juice before Kanzi. He chose the cup with juice over three-quarters of the time, confirming that bonobos can differentiate between real and imaginary content.

For the third test, researchers filled one cup with real grapes, which Kanzi selected each time. They then added a pretend grape to each cup, leaving one empty. Again, Kanzi successfully identified the cup that still contained the pretend grapes over two-thirds of the trials.

Bastos emphasized that all of the work with great apes was entirely voluntary. “Kanzi’s persistence during trials, even without tangible rewards, indicates he must have found some enjoyment in the activity.”

Gisela Kaplan, a researcher from the University of New England in Armidale, Australia, remarked that the experiment “demonstrates that bonobos are capable of understanding pretense and actively participating in the game.”

“The research design is straightforward, mimicking children’s play scenarios, like serving tea in a dollhouse, where they enact drinking tea and offering imaginary cake,” she elaborates.

Miguel Llorente, a professor at the University of Girona in Spain, hailed Kanzi as “a fellow Einstein” while seeking to understand the origins and mechanisms of such imaginative capabilities.

“Kanzi’s lifelong interaction with symbolic language and humans may have provided him with a robust cognitive framework, enabling him to enhance latent mental tools that bonobos may possess in the wild,” he asserts. “Although Kanzi epitomizes the cognitive potential of his species, his capabilities suggest that the fundamental biological basis for imagination has long existed in our common ancestor, dating back 6 to 9 million years.”

Topics:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Nothing Ear 3 Review: Stylish Earphones Featuring ‘Super Mic’ Party Trick

The latest translucent noise-cancelling earbuds from Nothing feature an innovative twist: the case includes a high-quality built-in microphone that enables you to communicate simply by pressing a button.

This so-called super microphone caters to those who desire a more direct microphone experience for improved clarity during conversations, recordings, and voice notes, even in bustling environments. It’s particularly suited for individuals who speak directly into the bottom of their phones.

However, this enhancement in the case’s functionality has led to a price increase, with Year 3 now retailing at £179 (€179/$179/AU$299), which is £50 more than the prior model’s launch price. While still competitively priced compared to leading competitors, it’s now closer to the Google Pixel Buds Pro 2 and Apple AirPods Pro 3.

Visible magnets and other features through the earbuds’ case add an intriguing touch to the design. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

Ear 3 maintains Nothing’s hallmark translucent aesthetic, introducing various small design details that set them apart from mundane earbuds, while incorporating aluminum in place of some plastic for a more polished appearance.

The earbuds have been redesigned for enhanced comfort during prolonged listening sessions. Their lightweight and secure fit ensures a snug seal in your ear. The stem features squeeze controls for playback, noise cancellation, volume adjustments, and voice assistant activation. Although somewhat limited, the controls are customizable and function effectively.

The earbuds come in a square, flip-top charging case that is compact yet noticeably heavier this year. With a battery life of 6 hours on a single charge, and with noise cancellation active, you can enjoy at least 22 hours of total playback when utilizing the case for recharging. The case itself charges in slightly over an hour via USB-C and around 2 hours using Qi wireless charging.

Activating the earbuds’ Super Microphone involves pressing and holding the “Talk” button on the case, which emits a subtle sound when the microphone is turned on. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

Equipped with a capable built-in microphone, the earbuds effectively filter out ambient noise, although they may occasionally sound somewhat robotic. The Super Mic offers richer, fuller audio, making it ideal for voice memos, transcription, and calls. Nevertheless, the audio quality doesn’t quite reach the standards for a lapel microphone or similar recording devices.

Specifications

  • Water Resistance: IP54 (splash-proof)

  • Connectivity: Bluetooth 5.4 (SBC, AAC, LDAC)

  • Battery Life: 5.5 hours with ANC (22 hours with case)

  • Earphone Dimensions: 30.5×21.5×20.8mm

  • Earphone Weight: 5.2g each

  • Driver Size: 12mm

  • Charging Case Dimensions: 56×55.5×22.3mm

  • Charging Case Weight: 61g

  • Case Charging: USB-C

Sound Quality and Noise Cancelling

Each earbud comes with three sizes of silicone tips for a comfortable fit and a secure seal. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

These earphones utilize high-quality Bluetooth 5.4 alongside standard SBC and AAC audio formats, with support for LDAC for compatible Android devices. They also offer the capability to connect to two devices simultaneously; however, this may slow the Super Mic’s performance.

Previous models from Nothing have consistently provided excellent value, characterized by easy-to-listen sound with ample detail and clear sound separation. The Ear 3 follows this tradition, offering louder sound with a prominent bass response right out of the box. It’s well-balanced and does not overshadow the overall sound range, while the Nothing X companion app allows for extensive customization if desired.

The noise cancellation effectively reduces common ambient sounds and low-frequency commuting noises, handling higher-pitched disturbances like keyboard taps and conversations better than prior Nothing models. However, it doesn’t quite match the level of noise cancellation provided by higher-end alternatives, such as the AirPods Pro 3.

The transparency mode performs admirably, delivering a natural sound; however, neither mode excels at managing wind noise.

Sustainability

One of the microphones inside the case is adjacent to the USB-C charging port, indicated by a green LED light when active. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

The earbuds and charging case are designed to maintain at least 80% battery capacity survival even after 500 complete charge cycles. Although earbuds themselves are not repairable, they can be replaced individually through service if they fall out of warranty.

The casing is made from recycled aluminum and tin, though Nothing does not provide trade-in options. The estimated carbon footprint of the earbuds stands at 2.87kg.

Price

The cost of the Nothing Ear 3 is £179 (179 EUR/$179/AU$299).

For comparison, the Ear priced at £119, the headphone price for 1 is £299, the Google Pixel Buds Pro 2 costs £219, the Samsung Galaxy Buds 3 Pro is £219, and the Apple AirPods Pro 3 retails for £219.

Verdict

Nothing has introduced some features we haven’t previously encountered in earbuds, such as the integration of a microphone and push-to-talk button directly into the charging case. This concept is original and serves as an excellent alternative to traditional interview or video microphones, albeit lacking in certain aspects.

For non-content creators, this setup is perfect for phone calls, recording voice notes, and interacting with your phone’s AI assistant, resembling a modern dictaphone. However, personal frequency of use may vary.

The earbuds present a noteworthy offering from Nothing, delivering impressive sound quality, effective noise cancellation, robust battery life, and a comfortable fit, making them a refreshing alternative to typical earbuds.

While the price increase to £180 places them alongside some top-tier earbuds, they haven’t yet reached that elite status. Additionally, similar to many competitors in the space, these earbuds are non-repairable, which affects their overall score negatively.

Pros: Super microphone, unique design, excellent sound quality, reliable noise cancellation, comfortable fit, intuitive controls, Bluetooth 5.4 with multipoint support, cross-platform app options, and impressive battery life.

Cons: Non-repairable, higher cost than its predecessor, a fairly heavy case, the Super Mic doesn’t fully substitute for a dedicated mic, and noise cancellation struggles in high-noise settings.

The Nothing Ear 3 boasts attractive design features along with a couple of unique functionalities. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

Source: www.theguardian.com

Does Elon Musk’s New Political Party Require Its Own Donald Trump? | Technology

Greetings and welcome to TechScape! In this week’s Technology News, Elon Musk and Donald Trump are reigniting their battle against the president’s extensive tax bill and the looming prospect of forming a third party for Tesla’s top executives. The effectiveness of the wealthiest individuals’ endeavors heavily relies on their ability to enlist other prominent politicians. Additionally, we’re curious to know if you employ generative artificial intelligence for crafting personal messages. Reach out via tech.editorial@theguardian.com and share your thoughts with us.

<h2 id="elon-musk-needs-another-donald-trump" class="dcr-12ibh7f">Elon Musk requires another Donald Trump</h2>

<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">The rivalry between Elon Musk and Donald Trump has been revived following the passage of the president's significant tax legislation on July 3rd. Musk has been vocal (via Twitter) in expressing his opposition to the "hatred" embodied in the law for weeks, yet it was approved. The discord surrounding the bill triggered their first separation back in early June.</p>

<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">Musk is now contemplating the establishment of a new centrist party, indicating he might pursue his ultimatum to form an "American Party." Trump's response highlighted the absurdity of this idea, labeling it a "train wreck" through a lengthy post on True Social, emphasizing that third parties have historically failed in the United States. Following this news, Tesla's stock prices experienced a significant drop.</p>

<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">What exactly would the proposed American Party accomplish apart from antagonizing Democrats and Republicans? Perhaps it aims to target the key Republicans who supported the bill.</p>

<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">From my colleague Ramon Antonio Vargas:</p>

<p class="dcr-16w5gq9"><em>The new party Musk intends to fund could focus on a limited number of achievable House and Senate seats while aiming to make a decisive vote on crucial issues in Congress's narrow margins. Musk tweeted that his strategy to meet his political aspirations is to "concentrate laser-like on just two or three Senate seats and around eight to ten House districts."</em></p>

<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">Could Musk himself run for office? It's doubtful. While he has stated a desire to refocus on his various companies, his recent tweets suggest otherwise. All Musk needs to bring his party idea to fruition is Donald Trump—an iconic figure who matches his financial prowess.</p>

<blockquote data-spacefinder-role="inline" class="dcr-154zxly">
    <p><svg viewbox="0 0 22 14" style="fill:var(--block-quote-fill)" class="dcr-scql1j"><path d="M5.255 0h4.75c-.572 4.53-1.077 8.972-1.297 13.941H0C.792 9.104 2.44 4.53 5.255 0Zm11.061 0H21c-.506 4.53-1.077 8.972-1.297 13.941h-8.686c.902-4.837 2.485-9.411 5.3-13.941Z"/></svg>His role in politics resembles that of an ATM.</p>
</blockquote>

<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">The Wisconsin Supreme Court election in early April revealed Musk's lack of personal popularity. After making a public appearance and donating a million dollars, he witnessed his favored candidate lose against the odds. His function in politics is akin to that of ATMs. Despite being the world's richest individual, Tesla's market valuation has been challenged since he was active in Washington.</p>

<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">Since Musk himself is an ineffective voter, the success of his new party hangs on the presence of a compelling star, similar to another significant Trump. He requires a conduit to direct his donations toward an engaging and effective campaign.</p>

<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">So far, there seems to be no such individual. Trump's stronghold on the Republican Party is solidified, and he orchestrates rapid and harsh retaliation against disloyal figures, including Musk. There's a substantial risk in fleeing from Trump's party to partake in Musk's unusual centrist venture. The only group eager to witness the formation of a new party comprises X's chaos-loving supporters, who have urged Musk to act decisively in last week’s polling. However, if any of them seek office, it’s likely they simply desire the most bizarre turn of events for our shared destiny.</p>

<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">Noteworthy and coincidental timing: OpenAI CEO Sam Altman expressed feeling "politically homeless" this weekend, echoing Musk's own sentiments regarding his political stance. These two Silicon Valley influencers harbor mutual animosity, evident from Musk's extended legal skirmishes aimed at halting the shift of OpenAI from a nonprofit model to a profit-driven enterprise. Nonetheless, despite their conflict, they both articulated a similar notion.</p>

<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">Musk and Altman embody entirely different public personas. While Musk is boisterous online, Altman is more reserved. As Musk gravitates toward right-wing politics, Altman attempts to straddle both sides of the aisle. However, the alignment of their emotions indicates why these two collaborated in 2015 to establish OpenAI.</p>

<h2 id="do-you-use-ai-to-write-your-texts" class="dcr-12ibh7f">Do you utilize AI for composing messages?</h2>

<figure id="479f5cbe-be80-403d-9d65-22049ff16d01" data-spacefinder-role="inline" data-spacefinder-type="model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.ImageBlockElement" class="dcr-173mewl">
    <figcaption data-spacefinder-role="inline" class="dcr-1tx6u99"><span class="dcr-1inf02i"><svg width="18" height="13" viewbox="0 0 18 13"><path d="M18 3.5v8l-1.5 1.5h-15l-1.5-1.5v-8l1.5-1.5h3.5l2-2h4l2 2h3.5l1.5 1.5zm-9 7.5c1.9 0 3.5-1.6 3.5-3.5s-1.6-3.5-3.5-3.5-3.5 1.6-3.5 3.5 1.6 3.5 3.5 3.5z"/></svg></span>  Illustration: Raven Jiang/The Guardian</figcaption>
</figure>

<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">Recently, we featured articles spotlighting individuals who leverage generative artificial intelligence to craft personal messages. AI is becoming more prevalent in the workplace, promising increased productivity. Yet as we become more at ease in professional settings, it is also infiltrating our personal lives.</p>

<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">My colleague Adrienne Matei reports:</p>

<p class="dcr-16w5gq9"><em>Earlier this spring, Nick Wasseff learned of the passing of a high school friend's mother. Wasseff, a 32-year-old tech entrepreneur based in Vancouver, Canada, used Claude AI, a chatbot designed for human interaction.</em></p>

<figure data-spacefinder-role="inline" data-spacefinder-type="model.dotcomrendering.pageElements.NewsletterSignupBlockElement" class="dcr-173mewl">
    <a data-ignore="global-link-styling" href="#EmailSignup-skip-link-19" class="dcr-jzxpee">Skip past newsletter promotions</a>
    <aside aria-label="newsletter promotion" class="dcr-av5vqf">
        <p class="dcr-1xjndtj">Explore weekly insights into how technology influences our lives</p>
        <gu-island name="SecureSignup" priority="feature" deferuntil="visible" props="{&quot;newsletterId&quot;:&quot;tech-scape&quot;,&quot;successDescription&quot;:&quot;A weekly dive into how technology shapes our lives&quot;}"/>
        <span class="dcr-1eusqlu"><strong>Privacy Notice: </strong>Newsletters may include information about charities, online advertising, and content sponsored by external parties. Refer to our Privacy Policy for further details.</span>
    </aside>
    <p id="EmailSignup-skip-link-19" tabindex="0" aria-label="after newsletter promotion" role="note" class="dcr-jzxpee">After the newsletter promotion</p>
</figure>

<p class="dcr-16w5gq9"><em>Claude assisted Wasseff in composing the notes, facilitating an open dialogue among his friends concerning their collective grief. However, Wasseff never disclosed AI's involvement, which he concedes.</em></p>

<p class="dcr-16w5gq9"><em>According to a study conducted in 2023, 208 adults received "thoughtful" notes from friends. The researcher noted that those who were informed the notes were crafted with AI felt "more uncertain about their relationships" when they learned about the AI's involvement.</em></p>

<p class="dcr-16w5gq9"><em>Using AI for personal correspondences is a gamble. The first risk is that the recipient might not realize, and the second is that they may be indifferent. Nonetheless, a conversation is underway regarding the merits of taking such risks and whether the AI input in personal messaging can be considered beneficial.</em></p>

<p class="dcr-16w5gq9"><strong>Read the full story here.</strong></p>

<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">Now you can effortlessly elevate your messages at the snap of your fingers. Does AI facilitate clearer communication of our intentions and dismantle the barriers to writing that hinder emotional expression? Or does it impede our relationships, as we avoid the emotional labor of drafting our own messages? Does AI enable connection without genuine effort?</p>

<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">The benefits and drawbacks are undeniable, with some scenarios appearing more suitable than others. Perhaps certain people wouldn't have sent a birthday card if they hadn’t had a personalized message readily available. One author from the <a href="https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2025/07/google-drive-personalized-chatbot/683436/" data-link-name="in body link">Atlantic</a> was taken aback when Google's Gemini, equipped with access to her conversations, generated a warm and specific birthday card that referenced genuine moments from her friendship. It's possible that they might have left someone without a personal touch had it not been for a mechanical speechwriter. All the variations in reception depend on the context of your decision to employ AI for writing.</p>

<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">We would love to hear from you. AI is impacting our personal moments and connectivity, as well as our professional interactions, and we want to learn about the situations you believe are most appropriate.</p>

<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">***<br/><strong>Do you use generative AI to craft personal communications?</strong></p>

<p class="dcr-16w5gq9">If you do, please reach out to tech.editorial@theguardian.com and share how and how often you utilize AI. Has it enhanced your relationships or complicated them further?</p>

<h2 id="the-wider-techscape" class="dcr-12ibh7f">Broader Technology Landscape</h2>

Source: www.theguardian.com

Tesla Shares Plummet Amid Investor Concerns Over Potential Brand Damage from Elon Musk’s New Party

Tesla stocks are poised for a significant decline in the US, as investors worry that Elon Musk might introduce more challenges for electric vehicle manufacturers by potentially launching a new political party.

On Monday, Tesla shares dropped over 7% in pre-market trading, which could erase approximately $70 billion (£51 billion) from the company’s market capitalization at the Wall Street opening.

Should the stocks decrease significantly, Musk’s net worth could fall by more than $9 billion, bringing it down to around $120 billion. According to Forbes, Musk, along with the head of SpaceX, ranks among the wealthiest individuals globally, with a combined fortune of about $400 million.


Tesla’s stock, currently valued at just under $10, is experiencing downward pressure largely due to Musk’s relationships with both the company and former President Donald Trump.

Musk’s staunch support for Trump has sparked consumer backlash, and the unpredictable nature of his relationship with the former president raises concerns about Musk getting sidetracked from his responsibilities, potentially leading to repercussions for the company.

Wedbush Securities analyst Dan Ives pointed out that Musk’s financial involvement in US political parties could deter investors.

“Musk diving deep into politics and now attempting to establish a Beltway is the opposite direction Tesla investors and stakeholders hope he would take at this critical juncture for the company,” Ives noted, adding that there is a palpable “broader fatigue” regarding Musk’s political endeavors.

On Sunday, Trump criticized Musk’s ambitions, labeling the American Party as a “silly” initiative.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Trump took to Truth Social to express his disappointment over Musk’s new direction, stating: “I’m sad to see Elon Musk go to Rails completely.”

Over the weekend, Musk revealed the formation of the American Party on his X platform, declaring: “We live in a one-party system, not a democracy, which is bankrupting our country with waste and graft. Today, the American Party is formed to restore your freedom.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Elon Musk’s Proposed New Political Party Could Target Key Parliamentary Seats

A new political party that Elon Musk claims he can focus on a select few attainable House and Senate seats while financially supporting crucial votes on pivotal issues amid the slim margins in Congress.

On Friday, the highly-paid CEOs of Tesla and SpaceX reflected on their strategy in a post on X, the social media platform he owns.

“One strategy is to concentrate intensely on just two or three Senate seats and eight to ten congressional districts,” Musk tweeted. As the wealthiest individual following Trump’s second presidential term that began in January, he is navigating severe federal budget cuts. “Considering the razor-thin legislative margins, it is enough to serve as a critical vote against contentious laws, ensuring they truly reflect the will of the people.”



Musk did not mention which specific seat he might be focusing on.

In another post on Friday, Musk conducted a poll coinciding with the US celebration of its 249th Independence Day asking whether his X followers would support his idea of forming a so-called American party to challenge both Republicans and Democrats. As of Saturday morning, over 65% of approximately 1.25 million respondents indicated they were in favor.

“Independence Day is the perfect occasion to ask if you wish to break away from a two-party system (some refer to it as Uniparty)!” Musk also noted in a message accompanying the poll, which he promoted multiple times on Friday.

Musk’s post on Friday follows his investment of $277 million supporting Trump’s campaign for the 2024 presidential election. In return, the Republican president appointed Musk to lead the so-called “government efficiency” initiative, known as Doge.

However, Doge’s actions could potentially lead to a loss of $135 billion in damages, according to a report by Public Services Partnership, a nonpartisan organization focused on researching the federal workforce.

Musk left Doge at the end of May and has recently expressed anger over Trump’s support for a budget proposal that would increase US debt by $330 million. He threatened to withdraw financial backing from any congressional members who endorsed Trump’s spending plan.

The House voted 218-214 in favor of the spending bill, with two Republicans joining all Democrats in opposition. In the Senate, Vice President JD Vance broke the 50-50 tie to support a bill endorsed by Trump on Friday, shortly after Musk published a related poll regarding the American party.

The contentious vote on Trump’s spending bill illustrates how closely contested outcomes will be in Congress.

Trump has cautioned Musk, who became a naturalized US citizen in 2002, that opposing his agenda could be personally costly. The president, known for his aggressive immigration policies, has openly discussed the possibility of deporting Musk from the United States and terminating government contracts.

“Without subsidies, Elon would likely have to shut down and return to South Africa,” Trump stated. He posted on his own social media platform.

The president also addressed reporters in Florida, saying, “We may have to put Doge on Elon. Doge is a monster that needs to go back and confront Elon. That’s not too harsh.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Discover the First Image from the Vera C. Rubin Observatory: Why You Can’t Miss the Clock Party!

Vera C. Rubin Observatory

Rubin Observatory/NSF/AURA/A. Pizzaro D

I’ve never attended a watch party, unless you include a gathering with my two friends for the Taylor Swift: ERAS Tour (which featured themed snacks). But now, it seems watch parties are evolving beyond just movie releases. In fact, I’m gearing up to join a watch party for my new telescope in just a few days.

I was fortunate enough to be part of one of the first public groups to tour the Bella C. Rubin Observatory in Chile, a visit organized by New Scientist. Now, just two years later, I’m eagerly anticipating the first image that will be captured by this colossal telescope, scheduled for release on June 23rd.

The Vera C. Rubin Observatory stands as a marvel of engineering. It’s set to perform sky scans across the Southern Hemisphere within merely three nights. Over a decade, the observatory will conduct scans for ten nights as part of its legacy survey of space-time known as the LSST. This project promises to revolutionize our understanding of astronomy, unraveling longstanding mysteries, including those related to dark matter, and revealing new enigmas.

Clearly, the images and videos produced by the telescope will be breathtaking. To fully appreciate their detail, watching on a phone screen won’t suffice. Even a desktop display falls short. To capture the full glory of a single image, one would need to utilize 400 Ultra HD TVs, as per the LSST UK consortium. Consequently, the team is encouraging partner institutions worldwide to organize watch parties for a more immersive viewing experience.

The specifics of each watch party vary depending on the hosting institution, which may include planetariums, museums, or universities. For instance, events will take place at the Perth Observatory in Australia and at City University in Hong Kong. Numerous locations across the United States, including the Detroit Observatory in Michigan, will host watch parties where attendees can enjoy science demos and hear from local experts. A common thread across all these events is the live release of the first images and videos captured by the Vera C. Rubin Observatory at 11 AM EDT (11 PM GMT), with everyone tuning in to the live stream.

Processing the intricate details of each image can be a time-consuming endeavor. Not only is there the requirement to zoom out and appreciate the telescope’s expansive field of view, but also to zoom in on galaxies in unprecedented detail. Images produced by Rubin will offer greater resolution than those from the James Webb Space Telescope, covering similar sky areas with 45 moon-like objects while JWST operates with roughly three years of data. Additionally, a time-lapse video capturing how the sky evolves over time has been recorded by Rubin.

You’ll indeed be able to view the images online, as well as in issues of New Scientist once they’re published or shared on social media. However, if you want to celebrate this moment in a community setting, consider visiting this interactive map to discover a watch party near you—or, why not host one yourself? While you may miss the full definition on your home screen, you can still experience some of the thrill of witnessing the unveiling of these images and videos alongside others.

I’m excited to attend a local event, hoping to capture the sense of wonder I felt when I first stood inside the observatory and marveled at its grandeur. It’s a scale that helps us better understand our place in the cosmos, even when contrasted with the vastness of the universe.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

The Labour Party Needs to Spread Their Message, Regardless of Their Desires | Social Media

During Keir Starmer’s 2020 Labour leader campaign, his team debated the idea of him leaving Twitter altogether.

Many of Starmer’s close associates wanted to change the party’s direction following a tough election and divisive social media campaigning.

Before Elon Musk took over Twitter, rebranded it as X, and allowed far-right figures back on the platform, there was a noticeable increase in misinformation. The aggressive nature of the platform seemed to fuel a darker side of politics.

Starmer himself has always been wary of Twitter’s usefulness, especially when dealing with difficulties faced by his own MPs. However, the plan to boycott the platform never materialized due to the challenges of being in opposition.

Currently, politicians like Starmer heavily rely on X for communication purposes. Despite criticism, X remains a key platform for making important announcements.

While Labour has a “tweet first” strategy, there are concerns within the government about the sustainability of this approach. Musk recently mocked Starmer on X, spreading misinformation to his large following.

Although government ministers do not explicitly mention X, they acknowledge the problem of misinformation on various platforms including X, Facebook, YouTube, TikTok, and WhatsApp.

Recognizing X’s unique position as a platform used by politicians and journalists, concerns about accuracy and the platform’s owners’ influence in spreading misinformation are growing.

Elon Musk may soon shift focus back to the US presidential election. Photo: David Swanson/Reuters

A spokesperson for Starmer condemned Musk’s inflammatory comments and actions on X, emphasizing the need for responsible behavior on the platform.

While Musk may eventually move on from provoking Starmer, the situation poses a challenge for the government. Efforts to work closely with social media companies continue, but further actions under the online safety law may be considered.

As some organizations and MPs reconsider their use of X, the dilemma of balancing the platform’s benefits with its drawbacks persists. The instant access to influential individuals and breaking news sets X apart, making it a difficult platform to abandon.

Despite criticisms and concerns, the importance of X in the political landscape remains undeniable, making it an indispensable tool for communication and information dissemination.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Kristen Ager-Hansen’s approach to the Conservative Party results in £70,000 donation

While spying in Mallorca, Kristen Ager-Hansen received an email from the Conservative party headquarters. The email expressed gratitude for his interest in attending a private dinner with Suela Braverman, who was the Home Secretary at the time and oversaw Britain’s security services.

Ager Hansen, a Norwegian businessman, claimed to employ veterans of CIA, Mossad, and MI6 in his operations, catering to clients like eccentric billionaires with services ranging from surveillance to social engineering.

In July 2023, the Conservative Party received a £70,000 donation from nChain, a company where Ager Hansen was the CEO. Questions arose about the legitimacy of the donations and the scrutiny on the money influencing British politics.

Ager Hansen’s controversial past included orchestrating stings and covert operations, leading to his appointment as nChain’s CEO. He had confrontations with the law and creditors, showcasing his aggressive and unconventional tactics.

Despite the questionable donations and connections, Ager Hansen continued to make moves in high-profile circles, engaging with influential figures like Rishi Sunak and proposing lucrative projects to the Conservative Party.




Arger Hansen claims he orchestrated the sting to discredit lawyers litigating cases in the cryptocurrency industry. Photo: Rex/Shutterstock

“Data geek and intelligence officer”

Ager Hansen’s tumultuous career, marked by bankruptcies and legal issues, culminated in his role as nChain’s CEO. His aggressive and unorthodox approach to business and personal conflicts shaped his reputation as a street fighter.

His involvement in high-stakes operations with a team of experts from intelligence agencies painted a picture of a complex and controversial individual who thrived in chaotic environments.

Suela Braverman, then Home Secretary, at the 2023 Conservative Party Conference. Photo: Christopher Thomond/The Guardian

“Serious and inappropriate”

The Conservative Party’s association with Ager Hansen raised concerns about transparency and accountability, especially regarding the donations and the nature of his past operations. The party’s handling of the situation and his subsequent dismissal from nChain added to the controversy surrounding his actions.

Despite the fallout, Ager Hansen’s connections and proposed projects continued to spark intrigue and speculation, highlighting the complex web of relationships and influences within British politics.

Source: www.theguardian.com