How Playing Instruments Aids Children’s Reading Skills

Learning to play an instrument encompasses both cognitive and creative pursuits

Andrew Fox/Alamy

Engaging in music training seems to enhance reading comprehension among young children by boosting their ability to discern and manipulate the sounds that constitute words.

Research has long suggested a connection between learning to play musical instruments and improved early reading skills, as shown in studies like Improved early reading ability and Mathematics. However, the mechanics behind this connection were previously unclear, as mastering an instrument requires a plethora of skills.

“Beyond reading musical notes—which necessitates learning a new form of written language—you must also perceive the sounds and adjust your physical movements accordingly,” highlighted Maria Garcia de Soria from the University of Aberdeen, UK. This process indicates that music education can enrich our cognitive abilities, enhance memory, and improve sound perception.

To further investigate the relationship between music training and reading abilities, Garcia de Soria and her team assessed 57 children aged 5 to 9. Approximately half of these children had engaged in instrumental study for at least one month with a practice schedule of a minimum of 30 minutes per week, while the others participated in non-musical extracurricular activities.

The researchers discovered that the children involved in music lessons outperformed their peers on phonological awareness tests. This skill relates directly to the capacity to recognize and manipulate the individual sounds—or phonemes—that constitute words, such as the three phonemes found in “dog.” Additionally, they demonstrated enhanced reading proficiency.

The research team accounted for various factors that could influence literacy levels, including socioeconomic status and overall cognitive capability.

In a separate component of the study, researchers utilized EEG to monitor and analyze the brain activity of the children while they were exposed to the Gingerbread Man fairy tale.

They observed that heightened neural activity in the language-related regions of the left hemisphere of the brain correlated with better reading performance across all participants. Notably, the music group recorded higher reading scores despite lower levels of this neural activity, suggesting a more developed capacity for adult-like language processing.

“Adults typically engage music and speech processing across both hemispheres, occasionally favoring the right side. It appears that children receiving music training develop more adult-like capabilities in this area,” noted Garcia de Soria.

This finding connects to the way individuals adapt their reading strategies as they mature, moving from sounding out phonemes to recognizing words and their meanings without mental rehearsal, explained team member Anastasia Klimovich-Gray at the University of Aberdeen.

Phonological recognition is a crucial precursor to learning how to read, which supports the idea that music education can enhance literacy by fostering increased sensitivity to phonological structures, according to Klimovich-Gray. However, it’s not necessarily a one-sided relationship; Garcia de Soria added, “Music fosters reading skills, but reading may also bolster future music performance.”

Demonstrating that these skills can mutually enhance one another may assist children who struggle with reading, Klimovich-Gray explained. “For those facing phonological challenges early on, potentially before a dyslexia diagnosis, music training could provide supplementary support alongside phonics instruction.”

“The revelation that music training refines the phonological encoding processes in the left hemisphere aligns with broader academic findings,” stated Alice Mado Proverbio at the University of Bicocca in Milan, Italy. Furthermore, music education may also cultivate specialization in the right hemisphere of the brain, which promotes faster reading development, she concluded.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Books vs. Audiobooks: Is Reading Always More Beneficial for the Brain Than Listening?

Engaging with information can alter how your brain processes and reacts to it

Tony Anderson/Getty Images

As a passionate reader and writer, I often find myself disheartened. Recent reports indicate a decline in reading for enjoyment among younger generations. When a friend asked if her use of audiobooks provided the same cognitive benefits as traditional reading for her daughter, my initial thought was, “Enjoyment matters more than the format.” However, exploring the science revealed that the medium indeed influences our cognitive process in important and distinct ways.

The Advantages of Reading

Reading unquestionably benefits us. Aside from the knowledge it imparts and the opportunities it opens up, numerous studies link childhood literacy with both physical and mental well-being – and even extended lifespans.

It is believed that reading exercises three crucial cognitive functions. Firstly, it promotes “Deep Reading,” allowing us to connect different sections of text, reflect on their relevance to our lives, and engage with the material critically.

Secondly, reading fosters empathy and bolsters our emotional intelligence—traits that are essential for coping with stress and navigating real-life difficulties. Thirdly, there exists a correlation between reading and cognitive development. The “Theory of Mind” refers to our ability to recognize that others may hold different thoughts and beliefs than we do.

However, discerning the impact of reading from other influences can be challenging. Moreover, readers may enjoy advantages like having leisure time, financial resources, or even genetic traits which can affect overall health, cognition, or longevity.

Nevertheless, a study involving over 3,500 participants attempted to account for these factors, revealing that individuals who read for approximately 30 minutes each day were 20% less likely to pass away in the subsequent 12 years. This benefit was more pronounced among book readers compared to those who primarily read newspapers and magazines.

Digital Media: E-readers and Audiobooks

Comparing print reading to digital formats complicates the research landscape. Some studies suggest that screen reading promotes a more superficial understanding compared to reading printed material.

There are also subtle differences. In a series of experiments conducted by Anne Mangen from Stavanger University, Norway, and Frank Hakemalder from Utrecht University in the Netherlands, it was found that frequent readers of short texts on screens tended to seek meaning less diligently than their paper-reading counterparts. Additionally, increased exposure to screen reading correlated with diminished persistence in tackling longer literary works.

Concerning audiobooks, while the evidence remains limited, I find some solace in the findings. Research indicates that comprehension levels are very similar whether one is reading or listening. However, some nuances exist—meta-analyses of 46 studies discovered that reading provides a slight advantage for interpreting the emotions of characters, among other interpretative skills. Thus, drawing inferences from the text is somewhat more effective when reading.

Diverse Cognitive Approaches

Interestingly, listening rather than reading seems to engage different cognitive aspects. For instance, research shows that individuals tended to think more intuitively when responding to verbal questions compared to written ones.

Listening to an audiobook provides the experience of hearing another person’s voice with its unique intonations, rhythms, and emotions, which can greatly influence interpretation. Janet Gaipel from the University of Exeter notes that contrastingly, reading relies on our inner voice, allowing for a more individualized and self-paced experience. These distinctions may significantly affect how information is perceived and utilized.

Nonetheless, “listening to audiobooks is not somehow detrimental,” Geipel argues. “The real issue lies in how you allocate your attention. Listening can be just as effective as reading if you are fully focused, but multitasking while listening can compromise depth compared to immersive reading without distractions.”

Finding What Works for You

Listening alongside reading introduces yet another layer. A meta-analysis conducted by Virginia Clinton Lisell at the University of North Dakota found that while combining listening with reading might yield slight improvements in understanding, this is likely only true for those who struggle with decoding text, such as individuals with low literacy or those learning to read in a non-native language. For skilled readers, however, this dual engagement may lead to diminished comprehension due to “cognitive load theory,” where presenting information in two formats can create redundancy and overwhelm cognitive resources.

Ultimately, various factors—dyslexia, visual impairments, lengthy commutes, or personal preference—can drive the choice for audiobooks rather than print. As for whether you derive equivalent benefits, “there’s no straightforward answer,” Geipel acknowledges.

If options are available, I suggest reserving an engaging podcast or a thought-provoking book for moments of focus, rather than while preparing dinner. However, if someone is immersed in a story purely for enjoyment, as in the case of my friend’s daughter, choosing an audiobook appears to be a far better alternative than missing out altogether.

Topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

New Study Finds that Regularly Reading Articles Can Help Protect Your Brain from Aging

Are you looking to keep your mind sharp as you age? One secret could be as simple as regularly exercising your brain with mathematics and reading comprehension, whether it’s at work, at home, or even while reading this article.

A groundbreaking new study led by Professor Eric Hanushek of Stanford University suggests that engaging in mathematics and reading can help prevent age-related cognitive decline. The research shows that individuals who regularly practice these skills do not experience significant declines in cognitive abilities over time, whether they are reading emails, doing calculations, or reading articles like this one. This challenges the notion that cognitive decline is inevitable with age.

The study reveals that cognitive skills typically peak in a person’s 40s before slowly declining. However, those who consistently engage in mathematics and reading, whether at work or in their daily activities, show no decline at all.

“Our findings indicate a significant increase in average skills in literacy and numeracy until the 40s. After this point, there is a slight decrease in literacy skills and a more noticeable decline in numeracy,” the study notes.

This study may inspire you to tackle your taxes – Credit: Skynesher

These findings challenge previous studies that suggested cognitive decline begins in early adulthood. Unlike past research that compared different age groups at one point in time, this study followed the same individuals over several years, providing a more accurate understanding of how cognitive abilities change with age.

Hanushek and his team propose that what was previously thought to be age-related cognitive decline might actually be due to differences in skill levels between generations rather than the natural effects of aging itself.

By analyzing data from language and mathematics assessments in the German population aged 16-65 and retesting the same group 3.5 years later, researchers found that women’s math skills declined significantly over time, indicating potential gender disparities. Further exploration of these differences is planned for future studies.

For more information, visit:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Goodreads Owner Embraces Amazon Partnership, Affirms Reading as Integral to Identity

Nadia Odunayo may not have had the intention of taking on the formidable global giant that is Amazon, but she has undoubtedly become a hero for many book lovers who believe they don’t need Amazon.

For 18 years, bibliophiles logged their readings, left reviews and star ratings behind, and received their next reading suggestions from Goodreads, a platform founded by two Stanford University graduates in California.

In 2013, the creator of Goodreads sold the platform to Amazon, causing its already massive popularity to soar. Currently, Goodreads boasts an estimated 150 million users.

Among these users since 2012 is Odunayo, a software engineer and developer based in London. Six years ago, she sat down and envisioned an app that could complement Goodreads.

After creating a demo for several friends, she quickly realized that she had inadvertently created a potential competitor. The app leveraged AI to provide reader tracking tools, trends, and personalized book recommendations. As of this week, Storygraph has amassed 3.8 million active users, many of whom have made the switch from Goodreads.

In a blog post titled “Leave Goodreads in 2025!” just before Christmas, a book blogger and reviewer known as Bunny expressed dissatisfaction with Goodreads, stating, “I feel Goodreads is outdated. Its interface is clunky and offers limited functionality… I found Goodreads’ recommendations overwhelming and heavily skewed towards popular titles.”

Bunny announced her decision to switch to Storygraph, emphasizing, “I’ve loved it from the start! Not only is it female-owned, but it also offers a plethora of wonderful features.”

A Goodreads representative mentioned that the platform welcomes millions of readers, facilitating the exploration of hundreds of millions of books within the community. The spokesperson emphasized strong growth in user engagement with the platform.

Odunayo, 33, remarked, “I believe people appreciate the diversity of data we offer. With many exciting features and a engaged reader community…”

“But when people compare us to Goodreads, the prevailing sentiment is, ‘It’s the fact that Amazon doesn’t own it.”

Storygraph has attempted to address concerns surrounding malicious reviews and personal attacks by disallowing private messages and comments on reviews. Odunayo emphasized the importance of avoiding a scenario where users face unwarranted criticism or harassment.

Despite the increasing user base, Storygraph remains independently operated by Odunayo, who actively engages with users through social media and shares insights about the app and her reading habits.

As Storygraph experiences continued growth, the question arises: can it endure? What if Amazon attempts to acquire Goodreads competitors with lucrative offers?

Odunayo firmly states, “That’s not something we’re interested in. StoryGraph has had zero external investment; it’s a fully self-sustained venture. While anything is possible, we are currently content and committed to StoryGraph. I believe it’s the culmination of our life’s work.”

She further adds, “I believe there’s no cap on our potential growth while maintaining our current ethos. Our goal is to reach more users and become a globally acclaimed app.”

For Odunayo, the initial motivation behind all this stands stronger than ever – the love for books. Reflecting on her journey, she states, “I recall a friend caught up in social media for years, only managing to read 45 books.” She realized, “I’m single, no kids; with a 9 to 6 job, I only read 13 books this year.”

Currently, Odunayo reads 70 to 80 books yearly, distinguishing between fiction and non-fiction. Her current book is Time saving by Kaliane Bradley. She credits interacting with readers for broadening her reading choices and emphasizes, “Reading is ingrained in my identity as not just a CEO but a committed reader.”

Source: www.theguardian.com