Will Pay-Per-Mile Fees Benefit Mr. Reeves or Deter Electric Car Adoption?

3p: The cost per mile for an electric vehicle is minimal, yet it represents a significant shift in the UK’s approach.

Ministers have historically opposed any type of road pricing due to its potential political fallout. This stance might change next week. Rachel Reeves, likely accustomed to facing criticism over fundraising schemes, is expected to propose charges specifically based on the mileage of EVs.

The Treasury has nearly confirmed that some financial measures will be revealed in next week’s budget, though no specifics have been disclosed. As reported first by the Telegraph, starting in 2028, EV users will be able to pay an additional fee atop their yearly road tax or vehicle excise duty (VED) according to the miles driven that year. This could involve a self-reported distance estimate or an odometer check during an MOT.

The uptake of battery electric vehicles, which are cheaper to operate compared to petrol cars, is increasing. By 2024, these vehicles are projected to be driven an average of about 8,900 miles, based on statistics from the Department for Transport (DfT). At a rate of 3p per mile, the current 1.4 million EVs on the roads could generate £267 per vehicle, amounting to around £375 million annually.


The Treasury has effectively confirmed that a form of fee for EVs will be announced when Rachel Reeves presents her Budget. Photo: Carlos Jasso/AFP/Getty Images

Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander had difficulty dismissing a national road pricing scheme during Thursday’s Commons questioning, but a later “clarification” indicated that pay-per-mile for EVs remains a possibility.

Looking ahead, a worrying deficit in vehicle tax revenue is anticipated as the transition to EVs diminishes fuel tax revenue. While petrol and diesel vehicles contribute taxes based on fuel consumption, the shift to electric will alter this dynamic.

Latest forecasts from the Office for Budget Responsibility indicate that a fuel tax of 52.95p per liter (roughly 5p per mile for the average car) will yield £24.4 billion this year, but billions of this income will decline starting in 2030 when sales of new petrol and diesel cars are phased out.

The key challenge lies in identifying fair alternatives to an unsustainable tax structure, particularly as there is enduring opposition from the right to all types of road pricing, which has become entangled in a culture war over London’s Ultra Low Emission Zones (ULEZ) and low-traffic areas, arguing for increased surveillance and reduced freedoms.


Last year, London’s mayor, Sadiq Khan, abandoned a review of pricing after being overwhelmed by anti-ULEZ sentiment. Photo: PA Images/Alamy

Some economists are in favor of time- and congestion-based road pricing, which may serve as a fairer method for managing road usage, although it also raises concerns about additional tracking.

Steve Gooding, director of the RAC Foundation, asserts that any plan should prioritize simplicity. However, regarding privacy, he notes, “The volume of data generated by modern vehicles is substantial. If the DfT or DVLA began monitoring Fahrzeugen, people might feel closely scrutinized. Yet Elon Musk has a different view: [Musk] – They don’t seem to mind.”

A broader issue is that pay-per-mile may deter drivers from switching to electric vehicles, which is vital for reducing carbon emissions. Manufacturers, businesses, and motoring organizations like Ford, Autotrader, and the AA have expressed concerns about the timing of introducing new charges amid this transition. Under the UK’s ZEV obligation, car manufacturers are required to ensure that one in three cars sold next year is a zero-emission vehicle, escalating to 80% by 2030 (the remaining 20% can be hybrids).

Current grants for new electric cars can be as high as £3,750, making running costs more reasonable for some consumers; however, several discounts and tax exemptions have ceased. Transport for London recently confirmed that EVs will have to pay the capital’s congestion charge starting next year, with zero-emission vehicles also subject to VED from April onward.

New Zealand is raising alarms, according to a report from the Social Market Foundation (SMF). Electric vehicles became liable for road tolls last year, a system previously reserved for diesel cars, where drivers purchased permits in increments of 1,000 km (621 miles). This change, alongside the cessation of buyer incentives and tax exceptions, resulted in a dramatic drop in new EV sales, with market share plummeting from a peak of 19% to just 4%.


Electric car at a charging station in Auckland, New Zealand. Last year, EVs were made responsible for road user charges. Photo: Michael Craig/AP

The SMF noted that Iceland also implemented a pay-per-mile system for EVs last year, but maintained incentives and pricing differentials, resulting in a much less pronounced decline in market share.

Advocates of this emerging technology proceed with caution. The Electric Vehicle Association England, representing motorists, expressed to the Prime Minister that consumer confidence in EVs remains tepid.

For many individuals, particularly in lower-income neighborhoods or those reliant on public charging without driveways, operational costs no longer present the same appeal. Ginny Buckley, CEO of Electrifying.com, an EV review platform, stated: “For numerous people, the expense of running an EV could exceed that of a gasoline vehicle if they lack access to affordable home charging and depend on public networks.”

Graham Parkhurst, a professor of sustainable mobility at the University of the West of England, highlighted that the stark disparity between home chargers and public charging stations (which are subject to a 20% VAT surcharge) represents a “political time bomb,” further dividing socio-economic classes.

Even longstanding advocates for pay-per-mile, like Parkhurst, caution that such systems require careful consideration. “Charging based on mileage makes sense, similar to how fuel taxes function. However, we need time to devise how to integrate this into a broader transport taxation framework. If you need a vehicle, an electric car is undoubtedly the smarter choice,” he asserted.


Proponents of pay-per-mile warn that they need to be cautious in moving forward. Photo: nrqemi/Getty Images/iStockphoto

The think tank Resolution Foundation suggests that any mileage and weight-based charges should apply only to future EV sales.

Tanya Sinclair, chief executive of UK Electric Vehicle, agrees on the need for fundamental reform of car taxation, but emphasizes that the government must convey a clear intent to encourage the shift to electric vehicles. “Any actions that create confusion, like providing subsidies while also launching pay-per-mile charges, blur the message for consumers,” she notes.

A government spokesperson stated the administration would “consider further support” for EVs but emphasized: “While fuel tax applies to petrol and diesel, an equivalent for electric vehicles is lacking. We are aiming for a fairer system for all drivers, while facilitating the transition to electric vehicles.”

“The best time to integrate road pricing would have been in the past, but the political landscape is complicated,” noted Gooding. The cross-party Transport Select Committee advocated for urgent road pricing implementation in 2022 to replace all vehicle taxation for every vehicle type. Yet, no minister has shown enthusiasm for this. Mayor Sadiq Khan of London was compelled to reject the possibility of pricing last year due to overwhelming anti-ULEZ sentiment, despite earlier indicating it was a viable option.

According to Mr. Gooding, introducing new policies is “most effectively undertaken with the minimum number of vehicles involved, and limiting it to EVs could be more manageable than developing complex charges for the 34 million vehicles already in circulation.”

For some, including Buckley and the Transport Improvement Campaign, a controversial yet clear solution remains: terminate the 15-year freeze on fuel taxes and the temporary 5p reduction currently in effect since 2022.

The SMF reported that had the levy remained consistent in real terms, nearly £150 billion would have been accumulated in public funds. Regardless of how the pay-per-mile model evolves, Reeves stated, “We must ensure that taxes on EVs for businesses remain lower than those on petrol.” “The simplest method of preserving this variance is by increasing fuel taxes.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Formula E: Are Electric Race Cars on Track to Outpace Formula 1?

Citroën Racing Formula E car during pre-season testing for the 2025-26 ABB FIA Formula E World Championship

Independent photo agency/Alamy

With their sleek designs, smoking tires, and throaty engines, Formula 1 cars have dominated the speed charts for the last five decades. However, the rise of electric racing has the potential to shift that paradigm, especially as advancements in technology propel Formula E vehicles forward.

Formula E recently introduced its fourth-generation vehicle, capable of generating up to 600 kilowatts, equating to about 815 horsepower, enabling speeds of over 350 kilometers per hour. 320km/h has already been achieved.

Despite Formula 1’s current edge with top speeds exceeding 370 km/h, Formula E vehicles already demonstrate a 30% faster acceleration than their F1 counterparts, with the existing third generation capable of sprinting from 0 to 60 mph in just 1.82 seconds. As power and energy retention technology evolves, Formula E CEO Geoff Dodds anticipates that races on tracks such as Silverstone and Monte Carlo will showcase even faster speeds.

“In the upcoming years, this vehicle may equal or even surpass the speed of an F1 car,” Dodds stated. “It’s more about the principles of physics than our skill.”

A significant advantage lies in the exceptional efficiency of electric motors. In consumer electric vehicles like Tesla, Kona, and Ioniq, up to 90% of the energy used is efficiently directed towards movement. In contrast, conventional combustion engines, such as those in F1, lose roughly 25 percent of energy as heat, while F1’s hybrid motors waste around 50 percent. Conversely, Formula E cars achieve energy efficiency rates of 96%, largely due to regenerative braking systems that recharge the battery.

Electric motors deliver maximum torque instantly, eliminating the lag associated with gear shifts during acceleration. The fourth-generation Formula E cars utilize permanent all-wheel drive with distinct motors for each axle, enhancing acceleration, subject to the grip of the still-developing fourth-generation tires.

A notable challenge for Formula E is its battery technology. At the outset of the series in 2014, competitors had to switch vehicles mid-race to complete the distance. Sylvain Filippi, director of Envision Racing Team, remarks that Formula E could currently construct vehicles boasting 1,000 horsepower, surpassing F1’s capabilities for a single lap, but the battery limitations hinder such performance across numerous race laps.

“We’re not yet able to fit 80 liters of fuel equivalent into a single battery. It simply doesn’t exist,” Filippi elaborated. “The advantage of conventional fuel lies in its high energy density.”

Formula E Gen 4 cars can exceed speeds of 350 kilometers per hour

Formula E

Formula E aims to transition from liquid lithium-ion batteries to solid-state alternatives in its upcoming fifth-generation vehicles, which promise reduced weight and enhanced energy storage. This advancement could potentially enable Formula E cars to outperform Formula 1 in direct competitions, according to Dodds.

Nonetheless, even solid-state batteries struggle to match the energy density of liquid fuels, suggesting that F1 may maintain an advantage in race laps, as noted by Daniel Auger, PhD from Cranfield University in the UK.

“They’re definitely in for an exciting contest,” he remarked. “Yet, it’s likely that battery limitations will still play a significant role.”

However, this debate may remain purely theoretical, as the two racing formats adhere to different regulations. For instance, Formula E does not permit tire changes during pit stops and features “Attack Mode” functionality, inspired by power-ups from the Mario Kart series.

Brands such as Porsche, Jaguar, and Nissan are now focused on refining the powertrain and energy management systems of their fourth-generation vehicles to maximize performance ahead of their race introduction scheduled for December 2026.

Many of the technological developments from Formula E might also trickle down to consumer electric vehicles. For instance, the current Porsche Cayenne Electric incorporates direct oil cooling technology that originated in Formula E.

The performance metrics of Formula E “demonstrate the capability of electric vehicles to equal or surpass the performance of traditional internal combustion engines,” insists Graham Evans from S&P Global. “Moreover, this can be achieved with a stronger commitment to environmental sustainability.”

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

What Charging Kit Do I Need for Home Use with My Electric Car, and What Are the Costs?

When purchasing an electric vehicle, it’s essential to consider how you will charge it at home. The primary requirements are a charger and a smart meter.

Charger Kit

While you can charge your vehicle using a standard 3-pin plug, it is a slow process. It’s advisable to install a dedicated charger, a specialized AC station that operates at higher speeds and connects to your vehicle through a cable.

Most home chargers provide up to 7.4kW of power, enabling a typical EV to cover 25 to 30 miles for every hour it is charging.




The cost for installing a dedicated home electric car charger ranges from £800 to £1,200. Photo: Andrew Matthews/Pennsylvania

Auto Express estimates the average installation cost for a charger to be between £800 and £1,200. Additionally, a grant of £350 is available for renters, apartment owners with private off-street parking, or homes with on-street parking.

A smart meter is necessary for your energy supplier to monitor your usage throughout the day and apply the appropriate tariffs (see below).

Charging is generally easier for those with driveways or garages compared to the 9.3 million households lacking off-street parking. Some local governments have installed residential charging points on the street, like on lampposts. The government is contemplating the removal of planning permission requirements for installing a crosswalk “gutter” to run the cable from the house to the car.

Tariffs Overview

All major energy providers offer at least one EV tariff, typically allowing drivers to charge their cars at lower rates during specified times of the day.

As per the UK’s energy regulator, Ofgem, the average rate for default customers is 26p per kilowatt hour, whereas many specialized EV tariffs can be as low as 8p/kWh at night.




Long-distance drivers should aim for the lowest overnight rates and the most extended charging periods. Photo: Jonah Images/Alamy

Ben Galizzi from Uswitch highlights various perks available to drivers. “Classic” EV pricing allows charging during cheaper nighttime hours. For instance, British Gas offers rates of 9p/kWh from midnight to 5am. E.ON’s Next Drive has a rate of 7.5p/kWh from 12am to 6am. Scottish Power’s EV Saver charges 7.2p/kWh from midnight to 5am.

Additionally, there are smart rate plans that automatically schedule charging during the cheapest times of day, like when demand is low or renewable energy usage is high. You can program the system to charge your car when rates are lowest. For example, Intelligent Octopus Go charges at 7p/kWh.

Galizzi also notes a new subscription plan. Mr. Octopus’ Intelligent Drive Pack offers unlimited smart charging for £30 monthly. Ovo Energy offers plans starting at £27.50 with a Smart Charge cap of 700 miles per month.

Some EV tariffs may only be available to existing customers. Therefore, to access specific rate plans, you may need to switch to that provider’s standard rate first before opting for an EV tariff.

While assessing your car’s best value, Martin Lewis’ MoneySavingExpert site advises that many “two-tier” rates can fluctuate based on the time of day, offering appealing nighttime rates alongside peak ones that may surpass price caps. For example, the Intelligent Octopus Go can cost around 29p/kWh daily, while the default rate is 26p.




Urban drivers may find smart charging options offer better value, according to experts. Photo: SouthWorks/Alamy

Potential savings could also arise from salary sacrifice schemes, where the cost of home charging is deducted from an eligible person’s gross salary before tax and national insurance. This can include options like the Electric Vehicle System Charge Card.

Selecting the Right Tariff

Choosing the best deal primarily depends on your driving mileage.

Galizzi recommends that long-distance drivers search for the lowest overnight rates and the longest charging durations. “Aim to have your vehicle fully charged every night to be ready for the road in the morning,” he notes. For example, E.ON Next Drive offers rates of 6.5p/kWh between midnight and 6am.

For city drivers, smart charging options might provide better value. “The goal is to find the most cost-effective charging time,” he indicates. Similar offerings are available from Scottish Power, with rates starting at 9p/kWh.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Electric Vehicles: Is Leasing a Used EV a Smart Way to Get One?

When Anthony Santos sought a substitute for his Audi Q3 diesel SUV, he hesitated to consider an electric vehicle.

“We thought about it, but it didn’t seem right for us,” shared Mr. Santos, a sales manager at Liverpool’s RWinvest. However, as I explored my options, the chance to lease a pre-owned electric vehicle (EV) piqued my interest.

Just a few years back, finding a used EV, let alone leasing one, was quite challenging, but that’s changing swiftly.




Anthony Santos is leasing a Mercedes EQA for £360 monthly instead of the typical £570 via a salary sacrifice scheme.

Currently, there are one million EVs on UK roads, with early adopters’ vehicles making their way to the second-hand market.

EVs typically depreciate faster than petrol or diesel cars, which is problematic for leasing firms, rental companies, and corporate fleet managers. However, this means consumers can access more affordable lease deals.

Used car leases in the UK surged by 166% in Q2 2025 compared to the previous year, with electric vehicles driving this growth, according to the British Vehicle Rental and Lease Association (BVRLA).

“Three years ago, leasing used EVs was minimal due to a lack of supply,” stated Tom Groot, CEO of Electric Car Scheme. Now, used EVs comprise almost half of their business, up from about 15% in 2024.

At Octopus EV, the UK’s largest energy provider, the number of used EV leases has doubled over the past year.

Additionally, leading leasing firms like Lloyds Banking Group’s Lex Auto Lease, BNP Paribas’ Arval, and independent group Zenith are now offering leases for used EVs.

New electric car prices average around £50,000, making them unaffordable for many UK residents. In response, the government initiated a subsidy scheme last summer, while the used market offers a more accessible path to electric vehicle ownership.

Santos found he could lease a lightly used Mercedes-Benz EQA without any down payment. Through his company’s electric vehicle scheme, he opted for a salary sacrifice and ended up paying £360 per month for a car typically priced at £570.

“We had no savings; the tax benefits were a game changer,” says Santos. “That’s what motivated me.”

Lease Structure

Leasing a car generally involves monthly payments over two to three years, allowing individuals to avoid a hefty upfront cost. This often includes not just the car’s cost but also road tax, breakdown assistance, service, maintenance, etc., although insurance is typically separate.

Leasing a used EV is significantly cheaper than acquiring a new one, even if it’s only a few years old and well-maintained. This opens up pricier models at more budget-friendly rates, making it easier for those on lower incomes to shrink their carbon footprint.




In standard leasing, a new Skoda Enyak costs about £567 a month, while opting for a used model through salary sacrifice reduces it to £292. Photo: Arndt Wiegmann/Reuters

For example, leasing a new Skoda Enyak SUV starts at approximately £567 monthly, but for a used version, it can drop to £292 with a salary sacrifice. Volkswagen’s ID.4 SUV similarly goes from £506 to £296 monthly, representing a 42% decrease.

However, not all expenses are covered by the owner. Lessees could incur charges for damages that exceed ordinary wear and tear and may face excess mileage fees. A 10p per mile overage might seem trivial, but frequent drivers should consider the potential extra charges upon car return.

Salary Sacrifice

Top deals are often exclusive to employees in salary sacrifice programs. This arrangement allows costs to be deducted from pre-tax salaries, effectively lowering tax obligations. Savings vary by tax bracket—20% for basic rate taxpayers, 40% for higher rate taxpayers (earning between £50,271 and £125,140), and up to 45% for those with even higher incomes.

Ian Hughes, CEO of Zenith Group’s corporate and consumer business, noted that salary sacrifice significantly helps transition to electric vehicles by providing tax benefits through reduced National Insurance contributions for employers.

Salary sacrifice programs are available from a variety of employers, ranging from small businesses to major corporations like HSBC, BT, and Jet2, as well as multiple NHS Trusts. Typically, there are no costs to the employee, but the employer is liable to pay the scheme provider the equivalent of tax savings.

Employers may impose conditions, such as a minimum employment term or a base salary threshold. Additional eligibility checks ensure lessees can manage the monthly payments.




A 2022 Mini Cooper S electric model with 17,400 miles is available for £256 monthly with a salary sacrifice. Photo: Malcolm Haynes/Alamy

For those without access to a salary sacrifice scheme, alternatives exist. Carwow’s Leasey leasing service, for instance, provides used EVs. A 2022 Mini Cooper S electric car with 17,400 miles costs £256 monthly. While higher than the £209 for those in employer schemes, it’s still more affordable than the £310 monthly rate (plus a £3,000 upfront fee) for a new model from Mini.

Gary Comerford of the EV Thoughts Podcast described his experience leasing a used EV as “very smooth”, though not perfect. While unable to test drive before signing through Car360, he had a no-questions-asked return policy within a week. He deposited £1,200 and is paying £310 monthly for his 2021 Polestar 2.

“As long as you stay within your budget, getting a rental agreement is straightforward,” Comerford noted but added concerns about tax benefits being exclusive to salary sacrifice schemes, which he felt was unfair to self-employed individuals like himself.




After a £1,200 deposit, the 2021 Polestar 2 costs £310 monthly. Photo: ZarkePix/Alamy

Extras like insurance, home chargers, and even electricity can often be bundled in with the car leasing, sometimes offering additional tax benefits via salary sacrifice.

At lease end, you’ll usually decide to extend the lease or return the vehicle, with some firms presenting a purchase option. However, be cautious—early returns often attract termination fees, though some salary sacrifice terms may waive fees if leaving due to job changes.

According to Zenith’s Hughes, leasing a used EV can greatly facilitate the transition to electric vehicles if structured properly. “It significantly lowers the entry cost from an affordability perspective,” he remarked, referring to their new used EV salary sacrifice plan that “balances taxpayer savings.”

Combatting Depreciation

Leasing companies aren’t offering these deals out of goodwill. By providing used EVs, they’re mitigating the dreaded issue of depreciation. They acquired many electric cars at inflated prices in previous years, but the overall demand drop has led to unexpected price falls.

BVRLA CEO Toby Poston indicated leasing firms now face an abundance of rapidly depreciating cars. They prefer to lease rather than sell at significant losses.




The number of EVs leased in the UK surged by 166% in Q2 2025 from last year, totaling 40,600. Photo: ZarkePix/Alamy

By maintaining ownership of electric vehicles, leasing firms can keep profiting. Industry experience demonstrates that EVs generally require fewer repairs compared to gasoline or diesel vehicles, thus reducing large maintenance bills over time.

Hughes anticipates that Zenith cars will likely go through two to three drivers over an eight-year period before being sold, potentially minimizing residual loss. Addressing common concerns, he emphasized that significant battery degradation is “not a significant issue” for standard vehicles, as most EVs come with an eight-year battery warranty, covering leased cars as well.

The lower likelihood of costly breakdowns makes it easier to provide leases since there’s “less risk involved,” noted Poston. At the same time, there’s “an overproduction of vehicles globally,” leading to remarkable bargains currently available.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Tesla Reports Significant Profit Decline Despite Surge in U.S. Electric Vehicle Sales

Even with record-breaking car sales, Tesla’s profits have taken a significant hit in the latest quarter.

A surge in demand for electric vehicles ahead of the expiration of U.S. tax credits has revitalized Tesla’s declining sales figures, enabling the firm to exceed some Wall Street forecasts during its latest fiscal quarter. Nonetheless, it fell short of profit expectations, resulting in a decline in its stock price during after-hours trading.

Tesla’s third-quarter earnings were reported at $0.50 per share, just below the anticipated $0.54 from analysts. The company’s sales, however, surpassed Wall Street’s expectations of $26.457 billion. Operating income stood at $1.62 billion, slightly under the forecast of $1.65 billion, with net income down 37% from $2.2 billion to $1.4 billion.


Deliveries for Tesla in the third quarter saw a notable increase since the beginning of the year. Analysts attribute this rise to consumers rushing to secure electric vehicle tax credits that lapsed at the end of the previous month. The discontinuation of these EV credits, as a result of President Donald Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill Act, fueled a public rift between Musk and the president and continues to influence the company’s sales forecasts.

In its earnings releases, the company repeatedly highlights its optimistic strides in enhancing AI software and self-driving technology while also mentioning “changes in trade, tariffs, and fiscal policy” as obstacles it is facing.

“No one can replicate what real-world AI can achieve,” Musk stated during a conference call with investors. He also claimed that Tesla’s Optimus robot, which received minimal mention during the earnings call, could potentially be “the largest product ever created.”

“With Optimus and autonomous driving, we believe we can truly create a world without poverty,” Musk asserted. He further introduced a proposed $1 trillion pay package designed to safeguard Tesla from being “isolated” if it develops an “army of robots.”

This earnings report emerges at a critical juncture for both Tesla and Musk, as the CEO seeks investor endorsement for an extraordinary $1 trillion pay package in a forthcoming vote next month. This package depends on Tesla achieving several ambitious milestones, including attaining an $8.5 trillion market cap over the next decade.

So far, two proxy advisory firms have suggested rejecting the extravagant pay package, despite Musk’s substantial support base among Tesla fans and investors eager to please him. Glass Lewis and Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) provide guidance on how shareholders should cast their votes. As reported recently, they have recommended against the proposed multi-trillion dollar compensation package.

During the investor call this Wednesday, Musk made various claims regarding the future of Tesla’s robotaxi ride-sharing service. He informed investors that the robotaxi initiative—which includes a safety driver in the self-driving vehicle for emergencies—will soon launch in Austin, with plans to remove the driver entirely. Recent weeks have seen major U.S. transportation safety regulators announce: an investigation into traffic safety violations and crashes related to Tesla’s fully autonomous driving technology.

This week, Musk insulted U.S. Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy through a series of posts, including labeling him “Sean Dummy” and sharing calls for his dismissal. Duffy, who also serves as NASA’s acting administrator, indicated Monday that he would resume bidding on contracts for the space agency’s Artemis moon program due to Musk’s SpaceX falling behind schedule.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Shareholders are set to vote on Musk’s $1 trillion compensation proposal during the company’s annual meeting on November 6. Both Tesla and Musk have pushed back against criticisms of the proposal, with the company labeling ISS’s recommendation against the pay package as “baseless and meaningless” in an extensive post on X. Musk hinted in a post on X that he might consider departing from the company if his pay package doesn’t secure approval and accused ISS and Glass Lewis of engaging in “corporate terrorism” during a conference call with investors.

Tesla has experienced a rocky year, marked by heightened competition, the loss of key tax credits, and Musk’s tumultuous leadership. The company reported declines in profits and revenue in the previous quarter. Musk’s political actions, including his prominent role in the Trump administration and promotion of far-right movements, have sparked widespread backlash and fostered anti-Tesla sentiments following a drop in the company’s stock price earlier this year.


While Tesla’s stock has seen significant growth over the past six months, Musk has actively been promoting self-driving taxis and robotics as future income streams. Just last month, he claimed that Tesla’s Optimus robot, a humanoid machine still in development and unavailable for purchase, could eventually represent 80% of the company’s revenue. Musk has made similarly grand declarations about robotaxis populating cities globally, continually extending the timeline for their anticipated rollout.

Recently, Tesla introduced a long-anticipated, more affordable sedan, the Model Y, aimed at improving tepid sales. This new sedan line has faced criticism from some analysts due to its starting prices of $39,990 and $36,990, which are significantly higher than those of lower-priced rivals in China. Consequently, Tesla’s stock price fell shortly after the launch. Additionally, the Cybertruck, which debuted in 2024, has not made a substantial impact on overall sales.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Study Reveals Plug-In Hybrids Emit Nearly the Same Pollution as Gasoline Vehicles

Plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) release nearly five times more greenhouse gas emissions than reported statistics suggest. I found a report detailing this issue.

These vehicles can operate on electric batteries as well as internal combustion engines and have been promoted by European manufacturers as a means to travel longer distances while lowering emissions—offering an alternative to fully electric cars.

Research indicates that PHEVs emit just 19% less CO2. An analysis from the nonprofit organization Transport and Environment was released on Thursday, showing laboratory tests estimated 75% less pollution.

Researchers examined data from fuel consumption meters in 800,000 vehicles registered in Europe between 2021 and 2023, discovering that the real carbon dioxide emissions from PHEVs in 2023 were 4.9 times greater than those from standardized lab tests, an increase from 3.5 times in 2021.

“While official emissions are declining, actual emissions are on the rise,” remarked Sofia Navas Goelke, a researcher at the Institute for Transport and Environment and co-author of the report. “This widening gap is becoming a significant issue. Consequently, PHEVs are now polluting nearly as much as traditional petrol vehicles.”

The researchers identified that much of this disparity stems from an overestimation of the “utility factor” (the proportion of miles driven in electric mode compared to total miles), finding that only 27% of driving was done in electric mode, versus the official estimate of 84%. The analysis noted that the European Commission proposed two amendments to the utility coefficient ratio, which lessened the gap but didn’t eliminate it entirely.

Even when operating in electric mode, pollution levels were found to be significantly higher than official figures suggest. Researchers indicated this was due to the electric motor being insufficient for sole operation, with the engine burning fossil fuels for almost one-third of the distance traveled in electric mode.

Patrick Plotz, head of energy economics at the Fraunhofer Institute for System Innovation, who did not participate in the study, described it as a “very useful contribution” to ongoing discussions, as some in the automotive industry have claimed there’s insufficient data to accurately gauge real emissions.

“Without a doubt, the disparity between official and actual fuel consumption and CO2 emissions for PHEVs is substantial,” Plotz remarked. “Their emissions are much higher than those of gasoline or diesel cars,” referring to the study on the topic. “Any policy adjustments regarding PHEVs should be thoughtfully considered in the context of this data.”

Hybrid vehicles have re-entered political discourse as automakers urge the EU to ease carbon emission targets. The push to ban new internal combustion engine vehicles by 2035 is facing strong lobbying from the auto sector, along with resistance from member states with significant automotive industries.

“There should be no significant reductions in 2035,” stated German Chancellor Friedrich Merz following a summit with Germany’s struggling automotive sector, committing to “do everything possible in 2035.” Other senior German leaders have cited plug-in hybrids as an example of “flexibility” that could be integrated into the legislation.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Researchers calculated that the undervaluation of PHEV emissions artificially facilitated compliance with the EU’s average vehicle CO2 regulations, enabling four major car manufacturers to evade over €5 billion (around £4.3 billion) in fines between 2021 and 2023. The study indicated that PHEV drivers are likely to incur approximately €500 more in annual running costs than expectations based on lab tests.

“The exaggerated claims made by manufacturers regarding their plug-in hybrid vehicles are clearly misleading,” observed Colin Walker, a transportation analyst at Energy and Climate Intelligence.

“Consumers are misled into thinking that by choosing a PHEV, they are aiding the environment and saving money,” he pointed out. “In reality, PHEVs are only marginally more efficient than regular petrol and diesel vehicles concerning fuel and CO2 consumption, resulting in higher operation costs.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

MG Requests Over £500 to Repair Your Fraudulent Electric Car.

Our MG5 electric vehicles have spiraled out of control, and MG seems unresponsive to the situation.

After utilizing a charger at one site, the vehicle experienced a power system failure at a highway service station.

The car became unresponsive to all controls, including the off button. Consequently, we called the AA. The patrolman was able to start the engine and opted to take a test drive with my family onboard as it was pouring rain.

When the patrolman shifted the car into reverse, it surged forward and wouldn’t stop, even when he pressed the brakes. The vehicle collided with an AA van, and as it attempted to accelerate, its wheels spun and began smoking.

We all exited the vehicle safely, and eventually, a patrolman managed to switch the car off from outside. I was informed it wasn’t safe to drive.

The AA arranged for a tow truck to bring it to the dealership, covering the repairs (£2,500). A police vehicle was also damaged in the incident.

The dealership is scrutinizing the defect, and there will be a charge of £500 in costs. No issues were identified. MG insists the matter has been resolved and intends to pursue further investigation at their own cost.

Six weeks on, the vehicle remains with the dealership. I am reluctant to drive until I know it’s safe, yet I can’t afford continued investigations.

AB, East Lothian

You are not the sole MG owner facing issues. One individual was forced to ram his car into a police van due to brake failure.

I requested a technical report from the AA, confirming that the vehicle “jumped forward” when shifted to reverse.

It’s understandable to hesitate before getting behind the wheel until the issue is identified, and since the vehicle is still under warranty, it’s reasonable to avoid spending personal funds on the repairs.

MG Motor UK appears surprisingly indifferent, given the potential dangers posed by malfunctioning EVs. The dealership recommended that MG’s technical department investigate the issue and provide guidance, but MG let it go.

MG merely issued an apology for the “inconvenience” following your complaint.

My inquiries regarding whether the dealer-requested investigation was conducted prior to resolving the incident and how many similar cases they’ve acknowledged concerning power failures were side-stepped.

However, the company promptly initiated a more comprehensive assessment of the vehicle and conducted a 45-mile test drive, using various public charging stations. There will be no charges for this test or any previous evaluations.

“MG considers all reported issues related to malfunctions a priority. No associated faults with onboard equipment or the vehicle’s charging capabilities were discovered.”

“MG and our authorized dealer have meticulously examined the vehicle and concluded that an error occurred that isn’t linked to the vehicle itself. We will continue to provide support to our customers with relevant information and advice.”

This places you in a challenging position. Your car is deemed healthy, yet your trust in it has waned. Consequently, you’ve decided that selling it is the best course of action.

We encourage letters, though we cannot respond individually. Email us at Consumer.champions@theguardian.com or write to Consumer Champions, Money, the Guardian, 90 York Way, London N1 9GU. Please include a daytime contact number. The following conditions apply to all letter submissions and publications: Our Terms of Use.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Severe Nausea: Are Electric Vehicles Causing Car Sickness?

During a year of driving his daughter to school in a new electric vehicle, Phil Bellamy realized that she was anxious about taking a 10-minute ride every day.

While Bellamy, 51, had no issues with the car, his teenage daughter experienced nausea each time she got in. Research indicates that this is a common problem: many individuals who do not suffer from motion sickness in traditional vehicles find themselves affected by it in electric vehicles (EVs).

Concerned about his family’s aversion to riding in his car, Bellamy altered his driving style and considered purchasing a different vehicle, but the issue persisted. His daughters try to avoid traveling with him whenever they can.

“If we go on a trip, they make sure to take motion sickness tablets immediately. They wouldn’t even think of getting in the car without them,” he explains.

Bellamy appreciates driving electric cars for their quietness and smoothness compared to traditional combustion engine vehicles, though he hopes manufacturers will address the concerns of passengers affected by motion sickness.

Factors contributing to motion sickness include the relatively rapid acceleration of EVs compared to gasoline vehicles, the regenerative braking system, and the absence of sensory cues such as engine noise and vibrations while driving.

Research from China, a major electric vehicle producer, has found that EVs tend to induce more severe motion sickness symptoms than traditional vehicles.

Content creator Atia Chain from London shared her experiences on TikTok about suffering from car sickness in an EV this summer when she relied on Ubers for transportation.

Chain reports feeling “extreme nausea” shortly after getting in the EV, which ceased soon after she exited. It took her some time to realize that this happened only in electric vehicles. Now, she tends to avoid Ubers due to the prevalence of EVs.

“Usually, the nausea started right away as soon as the trip began. The first minute was particularly bad. I would roll down the window and find something to distract myself,” she shares. “The sickness lingered throughout the journey. If the Uber ride was 20 minutes long, I’d count down the minutes until I could get out.”

John Golding, a professor of applied psychology at Westminster University in London, explains that motion sickness has a particularly strong effect on passengers because it relates to their ability to anticipate changes in movement.

While the driver controls the vehicle, passengers, especially those seated in the back, may feel helpless. This could pose challenges for the future of self-driving cars.

Golding notes that the automotive industry is aware of the issue of motion sickness among some EV passengers and is actively researching ways to help them predict movement changes. For instance, car seat vibrations may alert passengers to changes in direction.

He suggests that individuals may also use motion sickness medication or adopt behavioral changes to cope. “The simplest solution is to sit in the front seat and have a clear view. It allows you to see and anticipate what will happen next, whereas sitting in the back means you can only see what has already happened,” he advises.

Consider motion sickness medication which can be obtained in patches or tablets from pharmacies, helping manage how your brain and body react to movement. It’s most effective when taken before travel.

Wear acupressure bands which some studies suggest may help, though results could primarily be attributed to the placebo effect. “If it works for you, don’t dismiss it,” Golding remarks.

Listen to low-frequency sounds. A study from Nagoya University in Japan indicates that certain vibrations at 100Hz may stimulate a part of the inner ear responsible for detecting gravity and acceleration.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Ethiopia’s Electric Vehicle Revolution: Leading the Charge in Global Development

When Architect Hen Degareg Bekele, in his early 30s, purchased a Volkswagen electric vehicle this year, he felt a degree of skepticism. His hometown, Addis Ababa, the capital of Ethiopia, faced not only frequent blackouts but also doubts regarding the vehicle’s quality.

Four months later, Degareg is pleased with his choice. He no longer has to endure long waits at gas stations due to the chronic fuel shortages in Ethiopia.

“Even if I arrive early in the morning, I still have to wait two to three hours. Often, they run out of gas before my turn comes,” he explains. “Owning an EV saves time. I have no regrets.”

Architect Deghareg Bekele at an EV charging station in Addis Ababa. Photo: Fred Harter

Until recently, electric vehicles were nearly unheard of in Ethiopia. However, last year, it became the first nation to prohibit the import of combustion engine vehicles. Today, EVs can be seen frequently in the capital, with China’s BYD being the most prevalent brand. Despite its recent rise to become the world’s largest EV manufacturer, Western brands remain popular.

According to the Ministry of Transport, out of the country’s total of 1.5 million vehicles, around 115,000 are electric. The goal is to boost this number to 500,000 by 2030.

Ethiopia leans towards a shift to EVs, despite challenges. Close to half of the 126 million population lacks access to electricity, and only 20% have access at least 23 hours a day, with only a third connected to the grid. Frequent power outages hinder many factories from running efficiently.

These shortages are attributed to the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam, which was completed earlier this month after 14 years of construction. With a maximum capacity of 5,150 megawatts, it aims to double Ethiopia’s current power generation, which is predominantly hydroelectric.

However, challenges persist, including the substantial costs involved in expanding electricity access to rural areas.

“Renewable energy has significant potential,” emphasizes Transport Minister Valeo Hassen, noting that the ban on fossil fuel vehicles aligns with Ethiopia’s green policies aimed at reducing urban pollution during peak hours.

The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam located on the Blue Nile River in Guba, northwest Ethiopia. Photo: Anadolu/Anadolu Agency/Getty Images

The primary motivation, however, is economic. Ethiopia spends about $4.5 billion (£3.3 billion) annually on fuel imports, a considerable burden for a country struggling with foreign currency shortages and widespread poverty. “This is one of our main expenditures,” notes Bareo.

In contrast, the country’s hydroelectric production is notably cost-effective. This has allowed it to attract skeptical drivers in Addis Ababa, who have witnessed fuel prices more than double over the past three years.

Taxi driver Fire Tilahun reports his monthly fuel expenses were around 20,000 Ethiopian Birr (£105), while now, charging his EV costs less than 3,000 Birr.

Skip past newsletter promotions

“I won’t go back,” he declares while charging at a new station in Addis Ababa. “Occasionally, there are power outages, but we manage.”

To further support EV adoption, Ethiopia implemented tax exemptions. Despite being expensive, in a nation where doctors average £60 monthly, the BYD model is priced at around 2.2 million Birr (£11,000). Meanwhile, combustion engine vehicles have skyrocketed in price due to 200% import taxes prior to the ban, distorting the used car market.

Efforts to foster local manufacturing are underway, albeit at a small scale. One notable site is managed by the Belayneh Kinde Group, an industrial conglomerate situated on the western outskirts of Addis Ababa.

An electric vehicle being assembled at a factory on the outskirts of Addis Ababa. Photo: Fred Harter

“We should not rely solely on imports,” Valeo states. “Our aim is to develop local production capacity to enhance skills and employment opportunities for our citizens.”

Yet, the sudden shift to EVs has been uneven. Drivers express concerns over insufficient preparation time. Currently, Ethiopia boasts just over 100 charging stations out of a target of 2,300, most of which are located in Addis Ababa. This limits road trips to rural areas that often experience more frequent blackouts, making it impractical for EVs beyond the capital.

Rema Wakugali recharging his electric vehicle, expressing the need for more charging stations. Photo: Fred Harter

At another charging station in Addis Ababa, Coffee Export Manager remarks that he is “genuinely satisfied” with his BYD, but wishes he could drive to Hawassa, a favored lakeside destination.

“They must construct more charging stations – it’s essential,” he insists. “There are too few in Addis. There are no electric vehicles operating outside the city. This car can travel 420km; what happens after that?”


Moreover, there are currently no plans to introduce electric versions of heavy trucks, which are vital for transporting most of Ethiopia’s imports from nearby Djibouti ports. As the fleet ages, the economic impact may be felt significantly.

The CEO of a prominent ride-hailing company in Addis Ababa reports that most of his drivers harbor doubts about the longevity of EV batteries and their resale value. Nevertheless, he remains hopeful that after his personal experience with an EV, the infrastructure will evolve to meet the growing demand.

“Initially, we believed this policy would fail due to inadequacies in power infrastructure, frequent blackouts, and a scarcity of charging stations,” he reflects.

“But now, I am cautiously optimistic.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

What You Should Consider Before Buying a Budget Electric Vehicle

When you mention buying a used car to most people, they tend to shy away. Some roll their eyes, claiming they want to avoid risks.

However, there are others who argue that it was the best decision they ever made. I count myself among them.

Having driven electric vehicles (EVs) daily for 15 years, owning seven different models, and covering 170,000 miles with just one set of batteries, I’ve gained valuable insights. Remarkably, I’ve faced no issues during those miles.

My only repair bill came recently. For my Tesla Model 3, the cost to replace the front control arm bushes was £375. I’ve owned it for five years and clocked 50,000 miles.

Driving Made Easier

Purchasing a used EV carries far less risk compared to a pre-owned combustion engine vehicle. An EV drivetrain consists of roughly 20 moving parts, unlike the endless list of potential issues in gasoline or diesel vehicles—think clutches, gearboxes, fuel pumps, and exhaust systems.

Numerous studies confirm that EVs degrade less quickly than their combustion counterparts.

For routine maintenance on your EV, you’ll primarily need to replace the cabin filter, change the brake fluid every three years, and rotate the tires. This is due to the limited number of friction-based components.

Understanding the mechanical simplicity of EVs helps identify key maintenance areas to watch for.

The most significant concern for used EV buyers is the battery. Luckily, extensive data shows that lithium-ion batteries have low failure rates.

Most EVs come with an 8-year, 100,000-mile battery warranty. If the capacity dips below 70%, the manufacturer will replace it at no cost. I drove one EV 250,000 miles with its original battery pack before it exited warranty.

Some EVs even show original battery packs functioning well beyond 300,000 miles.

Today, experts agree that EV batteries may even outlast the car chassis.

According to Consumer Reports, average battery packs have a lifespan of approximately 200,000 miles, while Geotab Research showed only a 10% loss in capacity among 10,000 EVs over ten years.

In contrast, combustion engines tend to lose efficiency due to wear and tear after just ten years.

read more:

What to Look For

Dealers now offer State of Health (SOH) certificates for batteries, and many EVs come with software allowing owners to check the SOH themselves. For instance, I checked my Tesla at 50,000 miles and found it still had 93% capacity.

When buying from a dealer, request a SOH certificate, or verify battery capacity in private sales. A capacity around 90% suggests minimal cell degradation, indicating plenty of useful life left.

However, some models have had issues. Early Nissan Leafs had battery cooling problems, resulting in a faster loss of range and capacity than other EVs.

Initial Renault Zoes faced battery management issues, while older electric smart vehicles can be challenging to maintain. Similarly, the earliest BMW i3 models showed reliability glitches, as noted by What Car. The concerns also extend to the MG4 and Vauxhall Corsa E.

The consensus is to be cautious with earlier EV models.

Though there’s no official count of private charging points in the UK, the charging point mapping app ZAPMAP estimates over 1 million locations. Photo credit: Alamy

Battery technology has evolved, providing better software, extended ranges, and faster charging times.

Some EVs feature Chademo plugs, which are being phased out in many regions. Adapters are available to convert these to the universally used CCS charging system.

Choosing EVs from 2017 onward generally means accessing more advanced technology.

Hybrid batteries tend to wear out faster due to frequent charging cycles, leading to premature failures.

Hybrids are also less reliable compared to purely electric EVs. This is compounded by the dual powertrains of gasoline engines and batteries.

Additionally, maintaining hybrids can be costlier. Their electric ranges typically fall between 20-40 miles for plug-in hybrids, while mild and full hybrids rely primarily on gasoline engines and aren’t true EVs.

Some EVs have encountered problems with charging port flaps, ports, and cables, although these issues are relatively rare.

Make sure to test the charging port and flap functionality prior to finalizing a purchase. Monitor the central screen for charging alerts and connection failures.

Before you arrive, ensure the seller has charged the battery to 100% and check the displayed range against the manufacturer’s estimate. If it’s significantly lower, reconsider the purchase.

While most EVs experience range reductions in cold weather, a warm ambient temperature should yield a range close to official numbers. EVs equipped with heat pumps show improved low-temperature performance.

Although 12-volt batteries in some EVs (similar to combustion vehicles) may lose charge over time, it’s advisable to replace the auxiliary battery every three years. This can impact how effectively the main battery charges, potentially triggering software issues.

Beyond electrical concerns, inspect for suspension wear in the front control arms and bushes. If you notice any rattling or creaking, inquire about it; the EV should operate smoothly and quietly.

Currently, a robust global dataset confirms that EVs are generally more reliable than gasoline or diesel vehicles.

Lastly, before buying, consider investing in a home charging unit (if space permits) to facilitate convenient charging at home.

This allows for an average full charge cost of under £15, translating to about 3p per mile. Even with a second-hand EV, this is significantly more economical than traditional filling stations for petrol and diesel vehicles.

read more:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Rust-Based Batteries Successfully Integrate with Electric Grid for the First Time

SEI 260538204

Rust-based battery systems housed within standard 12-meter shipping containers

Ore Energy

Iron-empty batteries that utilize a reversible rusting mechanism to store and release energy now stand as the first type linked to public power grids. Startup Ore Energy announced on July 30 that the battery developed by Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands is now grid-connected.

These batteries play a crucial role in maintaining a stable power supply by storing renewable energy generated from solar and wind sources, preventing immediate decreases in electricity availability during sudden changes in weather conditions.

“We need to effectively store the surplus of energy generated when the wind blows and the sun shines,” mentions John Joseph Mary from the Faraday Institute, a UK battery research facility. “Essentially, the battery stabilizes the energy output for grid usage.”

While most grid-connected batteries are lithium iron phosphate varieties produced in China, they tend to store only 4-6 hours of electricity and are quite costly, according to Mary. Conversely, the iron-empty batteries created by Ore Energy can store over 100 hours of electricity and are made from inexpensive, readily accessible materials.

“Iron is the most abundantly mined metal globally and is extremely affordable,” says Mary. “When combined with air, which is literally everywhere around us and essentially free, they are among the cheapest materials available.”

Battery systems utilize electricity to convert iron oxide (rust) back into metal iron for energy storage. The iron can discharge energy through a chemical reaction with oxygen from the air, reverting back to rust.

“During discharge, we transform the iron into an innovative kind of rust,” explains Aytac Yilmaz, CEO of Ore Energy. “When charging, we revert the rust to iron, repeating this process continuously while the battery breathes in and out atmospheric oxygen.”

The battery is housed in standard 12-meter shipping containers and holds multiple megawatt-hours of energy. One megawatt-hour can power an average US household for over a month.

Meanwhile, Massachusetts-based Form Energy is executing several iron battery projects across the US, set to be established in New England and the Midwest.

In addition to iron and air, these batteries utilize affordable, plentiful water-based electrolytes, significantly minimizing the risk of battery fires. “I hesitate to say this, but water is undeniably non-combustible,” remarks Mary.

Ultimately, the primary objective of this battery technology is to facilitate the transition of renewable energy resources to supplant fossil fuels within the electric grid.

“Energy companies are still heavily reliant on gas-fired power generation to ensure flexibility when solar and wind cannot provide enough energy,” states Bas Kil, Business Development Manager at Ore Energy. “However, a long-term solution will necessitate various types of flexibility, where these innovative batteries can significantly contribute.”

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Mind Electric Review: Purianand’s Enchanting Debut Unveils the Marvels of the Human Brain

Pria Anand sees “a vast marginal space” between health and illness

David Degner

Electric of the Heart
Pria Anand (Virago) (UK); Washington Square Press (US)

As articulated in Gray’s Anatomy, it’s no surprise that healthcare professionals have inspired numerous popular narratives. The journey of a patient through the healthcare system mirrors the structure of classic storytelling, featuring beginnings, conflicts, and resolutions, often accompanied by various tensions.

Although medicine is often perceived as grounded in hard science (blood tests, medical imaging, treatment protocols), it fundamentally involves storytelling, a theme that Pria Anand explores in her debut book, Electric of the Mind: A Tale of the Strangeness and Wonders of Our Brains.

During her time at medical school in California, Anand was concerned that her aversion to storytelling might hinder her. Yet, she found that how individuals narrate their experiences could convey as much insight as any clinical test.

Anand pays homage to her predecessor, neurologist Oliver Sacks, drawing from his personal anecdotes while diagnosing and empathizing with patients. In Electric of the Heart, she acknowledges the influence of Sacks’s iconic work, The Man Who Mistook His Wife for a Hat.

While it’s unrealistic to expect anyone to reach Sacks’s level of ingenuity, Anand embodies his empathy, curiosity, and intellectual breadth. Her writing is both polished and insightful as she navigates complex neurological concepts, addressing the narratives of individual patients with similar finesse.

However, Electric of the Heart transcends mere “clinical anecdotes.” Anand’s core message emphasizes the vital role of storytelling in medical practice. The human craving for narratives is ancient, universal, and remarkably resilient, often thriving even in the aftermath of severe brain injuries, as she notes.

Regardless of health status, how individuals articulate their condition may diverge significantly from a physician’s evaluation or observable metrics. Anand recounts the story of a patient who entered a coma following a cerebral hemorrhage but appeared to recover fully, often mistaking Anand and her colleagues for her former medical team as she made her rounds among fellow patients.

No one can match the brilliance of Sacks, but Anand embodies the writer’s humanity and broad intellect.

Anand delves into the way our brains can mislead us, highlighting both the hurdles and the character of medical practice. However, it’s not just the patients’ misconceptions that warrant attention; doctors can exhibit similar biases and errors.

The evolution of her own health conditions has profoundly informed Anand’s work ethic—from sleep deprivation during her training to the “phantom noises” she began experiencing that prompted her concern. It was later discovered that these sounds stemmed from a vascular malformation connecting her brain to her heart.

The inherent “imbalance of power” in medicine signifies an ongoing struggle between empirical evidence and narrative, as well as between objective truths and subjective experiences—this dynamic exists not only in the realm of physicians but also among the false dichotomies pervasive in healthcare. Historically, many confidently given diagnoses have been based solely on “scientific” definitions. One can reflect on the notion of a “wandering uterus.”

Although comparisons between Anand and early reviewers might not be misleading, Electric of the Heart invites parallels with Glass Body, a personal narrative by Caroline Crampton that also explores hypochondria. Like Crampton’s insightful account, Anand elucidates “a vast liminal spread between health and illness” from her perspective as a physician.

Both works suggest a growing openness in mainstream media to not only drama but the complexities of medical intricacies, challenging the traditional notion that the divides between “healthy brains and failing brains” or illnesses and wellness are as clear-cut as they seem.

In Electric of the Heart, Anand exhibits empathy, humility, and a profound interest in humanity—qualities that define outstanding doctors and ideally should be prevalent throughout the medical profession.

Elle Hunt is an author based in Norwich, UK

New Scientist Book Club

Do you enjoy reading? Join a welcoming community of fellow book enthusiasts. Every six weeks, we explore new titles, providing members with exclusive access to book excerpts, author articles, and video interviews.

Topics:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Will Electric Cars Lead to a More Kathic Society? | Technology




Illustration: Guardian/Charles Desmalice

Electric vehicles (EVs) are swiftly rising in popularity worldwide; in 2024, 22% of new car sales were electric, up from 18% in 2023. Research indicates that an increasing number of people perceive EVs as superior to traditional gasoline and diesel vehicles. Anecdotal experiences on feeling unwell in an electric vehicle’s passenger or rear seat have sparked social media discussions and raised questions among prospective buyers about motion sickness.

Nonetheless, several academic studies provide scientific explanations for why some individuals may experience more sickness in EVs.

“Increased illness in EVs can be attributed to a lack of prior experience, both as drivers and passengers. The brain depends on past experiences in other vehicle types, complicating the estimation of motor skills.”

While EVs are becoming increasingly accepted, conventional gasoline vehicles still hold a strong presence. Drivers have a long-established familiarity with gas cars, enabling them to adapt more readily to specific cues. For instance, a person who has predominantly driven combustion engine cars will anticipate acceleration after the engine revs, which signals a change in speed. In contrast, electric vehicles produce minimal engine noise.

Research has identified connections between certain features of electric vehicles and motion sickness. A study conducted in 2024 found a significant correlation between motion sickness severity and seat vibrations in EVs. Meanwhile, a separate 2020 study revealed that the absence of engine noise may play a critical role in exacerbating feelings of nausea.

“Those accustomed to driving conventional vehicles learn to perceive car movements through cues such as engine revs, vibrations, and torque. Therefore, experiencing an EV for the first time presents a unique movement environment that the brain needs to adapt to,” explains Emond.

Furthermore, regenerative braking technology in EVs, which enables the motor to convert kinetic energy into electricity while slowing down, results in smooth deceleration. This gradual slowing can lead to a higher likelihood of motion sickness.

A piece of 2024 research indicated that this phenomenon may serve as a key trigger for motion sickness in EVs. The authors noted: [“regenerative braking] might direct motion sickness.”

Motion sickness is believed to arise from inconsistencies among varied sensory inputs. The brain receives simultaneous signals from the body, particularly from the inner ear, which maintains balance, alongside visual information. When there’s a conflict between these signals, the brain interprets this “neurological mismatch” as a conflict situation.

“Improved understanding of self-movement is critical for predicting motor skills to mitigate motion sickness. When the estimations of motor skills by the brain vary from actual experiences, this conflict can reach a threshold that triggers symptoms resembling ‘motion sickness,'” states Emond. “If such a conflict continues, it can lead to physiological reactions often associated with motion sickness.”

Predicting vehicle movement is crucial for mitigating motion sickness, which means that drivers are generally less likely to experience such symptoms. They have the foresight of what to expect.

As these vehicles provide fewer cues about upcoming movements, the interaction between predicted and experienced motion may contribute to the heightened incidence of motion sickness in EVs.

“When navigating a new movement environment, the brain must form new habits, lacking any prior experience to guide it. This is akin to how most individuals feel nauseous in zero-gravity contexts,” remarks Emond.

As the adoption of EVs continues to increase, researchers are exploring potential solutions to combat car-related nausea. Various studies propose that motion sickness in autonomous electric vehicles might be alleviated using visual signals, such as interactive displays and ambient lighting, or through vibration cues that enable passengers’ brains to anticipate movement changes, thereby reducing sudden sensations during electric vehicle rides.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Study Suggests Major Challenges Ahead for Electric Car Boom in Five Years

The electric vehicle (EV) revolution is new research published in Cell Reports Sustainability.

The accelerating demand for lithium, an essential element of EV batteries, is expected to outstrip domestic supply in major markets by the decade’s end.

This analysis highlights China, the US, and Europe, which collectively represent 80% of current EV sales. Researchers caution that without significant changes, these regions may not fulfill their lithium requirements from local sources by 2030, leading to an increased reliance on imports and a heightened risk of global shortages.

“Many previous studies have examined the lithium necessary for low-carbon transitions,” said Dr. Andre Manberger, a co-author of the new study, in an interview with BBC Science Focus.

“The issue is that often we compare projected lithium demand with current mining rates and existing reserves. However, there’s a gap in the existing literature concerning mining feasibility.”

Globally, EV sales surpassed 17 million in 2024, marking a 25% increase from the previous year.

The International Energy Agency forecasts that electric vehicles could represent 40% of all car sales by 2030. However, this expansion hinges on a stable supply of lithium carbonate equivalents (LCE).

The study indicates that by 2030, annual LCE demand will reach 1.3 million tonnes in China, 792,000 metric tonnes in Europe, and 692,000 in the US. Yet, even if all current and planned mining projects are considered, domestic supply remains inadequate: China could produce up to 1.1 million tonnes, the US 610,000, and Europe only 325,000.

This shortfall could intensify global competition for lithium, primarily sourced from Australia, Chile, and Argentina. In 2023, these three countries accounted for nearly 80% of the world’s lithium.

Almost 50% of the world’s lithium was mined in Australia in 2023.

China currently dominates the global lithium market, and an increase in its imports could negatively impact other buyers. Researchers found that should China’s imports rise by 77%, the US and European imports could drop by 84% and 78%, respectively.

“Commodity trading tends to have a lot of continuity and path dependence,” Månberger explains.

“This is due to the established supply chain, contracts, and overall inertia in the market.”

Nonetheless, there are reasons for optimism. Increasing lithium prices may drive investments in new mining initiatives and motivate manufacturers to create more efficient battery technologies. Alternatives like sodium-ion batteries could also contribute to a more diverse market.

In the long term, recycling could assume a more substantial role. As first-generation EVs reach the end of their lifespans in the 2030s, materials extracted from older batteries could mitigate the need for new lithium extraction.

“I’m very optimistic,” says Månberger. “Historically, while it’s often straightforward to forecast potential bottlenecks and supply risks, innovations tend to emerge unpredictably when these challenges arise.”

Read more:

About our experts

Andre Manberger is a senior lecturer in Environmental and Energy Systems Studies at Lund University, Sweden. He leads the Misttra Mineral Governance Research Program, initiated in 2024, focusing on the rising demand for critical raw materials and addressing conflicts of interest in the low-carbon transition.

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Are Slate Auto Electric Trucks the Solution to High Car Prices?

Social media buzzed with reactions when startup Slate Auto unveiled its electric pickup truck priced at approximately $25,000 last month. The vehicle’s simplistic design features a silent body and nostalgic hand crank windows.

How wild is it? According to Cox Automotive, average monthly payments for new vehicles surged to $739 in March, up from $537 in January 2019. The average cost of a new car is now $47,400, while electric models are around $59,200. The high interest rate, currently about 9.4% on a 72-month loan, has further strained finances for buyers.

“Prices and interest rates are exceptionally high,” stated Mark Schirmer, director of industry insights at Cox Automotive. “For consumers who haven’t been in the market since 2018, the cost of a vehicle might seem shocking.”

President Trump’s 25% tariffs on imported automobiles and parts have prompted consumers to buy now, fearing further price increases. Cars priced below $30,000 are particularly vulnerable, with nearly 80% facing these tariffs. This includes popular models like the American-made Honda Civic and Toyota Corolla. The supply of budget-friendly models is expected to dwindle as automakers may cease the importation of certain vehicles entirely.

Enter Slate, a suburban Detroit startup backed by venture capital and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos.

Former Fiat executive Chris Berman, now CEO of Slate, mentioned that their trucks won’t be available until late 2026 but are intentionally designed to alleviate sticker shock.

True to its name, the truck serves as a blank canvas, enabling buyers to customize with over 100 accessories, such as power windows and heated seats, as their budgets allow or needs evolve. While it lacks built-in stereo or touchscreen display, it features a dock for phones and tablets, which saves costs and helps avoid the digital obsolescence often seen in car entertainment systems.

“I believe hardworking Americans are seeking value for their money,” Berman expressed in a recent interview.

This message resonated with 41-year-old Liv Leigh, who secured a slate truck reservation during its public debut at Long Beach Airport in California last April, paying $50 to do so.

She observed Slate employees convert the two-seat pickup into a five-seater SUV in just about an hour. Lee values the compact size of the truck, which is smaller than a Civic, along with its moderate 150-mile range.

“I love the concept of a utilitarian truck, a basic model that can handle dogs, muddy bikes, and plywood easily,” Lee remarked. “We don’t need a massive vehicle for our needs.”

Berman emphasized that efficient design and manufacturing are critical to maintaining the low price of their trucks. The grey plastic composite body panels eliminate the necessity for costly steel body stamping facilities or paint shops.

Just as the Ford Model T was available only in black, the Slate grants buyers a choice of 13 colors of vinyl body wraps for an additional $500. Customers can also opt for larger factory-installed batteries that extend the range to 240 miles.

“This approach keeps costs down while offering customers the freedom of choice,” said Berman. “They can customize their vehicles as per their preferences rather than adhering to manufacturer standards.”

Slate anticipates that its US-based supply chain, including batteries produced by South Korea’s SK On, will qualify for a $7,500 federal tax credit. However, some Republican lawmakers recently introduced a budget bill that removes this incentive and dismantles other Biden-era climate and energy policies.

Success hinges on Slate’s ability to navigate the treacherous landscape of electric vehicle startups, as several young manufacturers like Fisker, Nikola, and Canoo have sought bankruptcy protection.

Regardless of subsidies, Berman remains optimistic about Slate’s business strategy.

The company aims to price the truck around $20,000 before any government incentives, hoping to become a contender against the Nissan Leaf, which is the most affordable electric vehicle at $29,300 but no longer qualifies for tax credits. Chevrolet is set to release a redesigned Bolt SUV for roughly $30,000 by year-end, which will qualify for a tax credit, reducing its effective price to about $22,500.

Erin Keating, executive analyst at Cox Automotive, has praised the slate truck’s originality. However, she noted that the two-seat pickup’s short range and minimalistic interiors might not attract American buyers accustomed to high-tech features and comforts.

“There’s no harm in attempting to resolve the affordability crisis, but I question whether this will become a high-volume seller,” Keating commented. “Ultimately, this is a compact EV that offers very little. It doesn’t improve the array of affordable options with longer ranges.”

The Ford Maverick poses a potential challenge to the Slate, as its compact pickup is two feet longer, seating five passengers and featuring even more amenities. The hybrid version achieves 40 miles per gallon, with over 500 miles of range on a full tank.

Ford sold 131,000 Mavericks last year, indicating substantial demand for small, fuel-efficient trucks. The company has raised the starting price for hybrid versions to $28,150 as of 2024 due to tariffs on trucks assembled in Mexico. Ford confirmed that it would not pass on the entire tariff burden to consumers, offering vehicles at a price equivalent to employee sales until early July.

As with all vehicle types, American pickups have morphed dramatically over the years, with some extravagant models costing as much as luxury European sedans. Electric trucks from Tesla, Rivian, and Ford range from $70,000 to $100,000 or even higher.

Berman is keeping an eye on market opportunities for personas such as entry-level truck enthusiasts, families seeking a second vehicle, empty-nesters, landscapers, contractors, and delivery personnel. The company anticipates selling more trucks to customers who would typically opt for used cars, with an average price point estimated at $26,000.

A significant hurdle for Slate and other firms aiming to sell more affordable vehicles is that many Americans don’t appear to be purchasing such offerings, despite their stated preferences.

Keating highlighted that around 20 models currently available start below $25,000, predominantly small cars or SUVs, including the $18,300 Nissan Versa, the lowest-priced car on the market.

Almost all mid-sized family sedans start below $30,000, including popular models like the Honda Accord, Toyota Camry, and Hyundai Sonata. Yet, many Americans favor larger vehicles; SUVs, pickups, and minivans now comprise over 80% of the market.

Trump’s trade policies remain unpredictable. Analysts hope tariffs will add thousands to new car prices, subsequently increasing demand and prices for used vehicles.

In April alone, Americans purchased 1.5 million new cars, 400,000 more than in April 2024. However, analysts have noted that buyers are acting now to avoid being caught in a crunch later. Jonathan Smoke, chief economist at Cox Automotive, mentioned that new car inventories have reached their lowest point in two years, indicating potential price increases as dealerships sell out ahead of impending tariffs. Meanwhile, S&P Global Mobility has reduced its forecasts for new car sales, anticipating a 4% decline this year.

For those seeking refuge amidst financial uncertainty, electric vehicles present a sound investment, according to Keating. New electric vehicles received an average discount of 13.3% in March, translating to savings of nearly $8,000.

Lee recently leased a Chevrolet Equinox for two years, paying $5,500 upfront, resulting in a monthly payment of $230. The electric SUV boasts a 319-mile range. “Many people aren’t aware of the extensive incentives available,” she noted.

Source: www.nytimes.com

Minor Incentives Can Shield the Grid from the Electric Vehicle Surge

Sure! Here’s a rewritten version of the content while keeping the HTML tags intact:

SEI 249674519

Challenging charging patterns: Why night charging eases grid pressure

ifeelstock/alamy

Offering small financial incentives encourages many electric vehicle owners to charge their cars during off-peak hours, despite the lesser impact of motivational nudges.

This finding emerged from a practical trial illustrating how minor financial rewards can alleviate grid demand during peak times. Such flexibility will become increasingly crucial as the number of electric vehicle users escalates globally.

“Incentivizing nighttime charging led to a 50% reduction in charging periods and a substantial increase in off-peak usage,” says Blake Sheaffer from the University of Calgary, Canada.

Sheaffer and his team engaged 200 electric vehicle owners in Calgary, dividing them randomly into three groups. One group received a financial incentive of 3.5 cents per kilowatt-hour (roughly $10 monthly). The second group was given informational nudges about the societal benefits of off-peak charging, while the third group served as a control, tracking standard charging behaviors without intervention.

Surprisingly, the nudging strategy proved “entirely ineffective,” according to Shaffer. “Simply encouraging them to act out of goodwill didn’t yield significant results.” However, he posits that more frequent reminders than the initial one might have improved outcomes.

In contrast, the financial incentives brought a marked change in charging timings but only while recipients were receiving the money; once the incentives ceased, many reverted to their previous habits.

“The study compellingly demonstrates how small financial rewards can influence electric vehicle charging behavior,” notes Kenneth Gillingham from Yale University. Such rewards might have felt like “easy money” since nighttime charging was largely convenient.

This is particularly significant, as “many energy grids require substantial upgrades,” warns Andrea La Nause from Deakin University in Australia. She points out that her study highlights how financial incentives can lead Australian electric vehicle owners to charge during the day when solar energy inflows peak.

Meanwhile, utility companies like Con Edison and Orange & Rockland in New York have already initiated similar incentive programs to promote off-peak charging.

Topics:

  • Action/
  • Electric Car

Source: www.newscientist.com

Data Insights: Are Electric Vehicles at Risk from Cyber Espionage and Hacking?

Mobile phones and desktop computers have long been targets of cyber espionage, but how vulnerable are electric vehicles?

On Monday, a newspaper reported that a British defense company, engaged with the UK government, advised its staff against connecting mobile devices with Chinese-made electric vehicles due to concerns over potential data extraction by Beijing.

This article examines the security issues related to electric vehicles.


Can an electric car snoop on you?

Security experts quoted by the Guardian suggest that electric vehicles, being the most advanced vehicles on the market, could be vulnerable to hacking.

Rafe Pilling, director of threat intelligence at cybersecurity firm SecureWorks, notes that electric vehicles can produce a wealth of data that could interest a hostile state.

“There are numerous opportunities to compromise these vehicles as they collect data,” he states.

He further explains that WiFi or mobile connectivity can enhance data access for manufacturers through the “over-the-air” software update feature.

“Modern vehicles equipped with over-the-air updates, various sensors, and external cameras could potentially be repurposed as surveillance tools,” he adds.

A mobile phone connected to a car via a charging cable or Bluetooth is another significant data source, he mentions.


Should all car drivers be worried?

Experts indicate that individuals in sensitive sectors, such as government or defense, should exercise caution.

“If you’re working on a sixth-generation fighter jet and connect your work phone to your personal vehicle, be mindful that this connection could compromise your mobile data,” states a researcher at the Royal United Services Institute Think Tank.

Nate Drier, tech lead at cybersecurity firm Sophos, highlights the option to select “don’t trust” when connecting a phone charger to a car; however, this would forfeit many functionalities, such as music streaming or messaging.

“Most people tend to maintain that connection for the convenience it brings,” he acknowledges.

Pilling adds that even rental car users should remain vigilant.

“Generally, individuals may leave copies of their contacts and sensitive information in their car’s entertainment and navigation system, often forgetting to remove them before relinquishing the vehicle, making phone synchronization a risky move,” he advises.


Why are Chinese vehicles the focus of concern?

China is a significant producer of electric vehicles (EVs) through brands like BYD and XPENG. Coupled with the Chinese state’s practices in cyber espionage, this raises concerns. For instance, China’s National Intelligence Act of 2017 mandates all organizations and citizens to “support, assist, and cooperate” with national intelligence efforts.

“Chinese law compels companies to align with national security, so one must consider the possibility of surveillance capabilities in their vehicles,” he notes, albeit admitting that there is “no evidence” currently linking Chinese vehicles to espionage.

Experts believe that while electric vehicles are a concern, devices like mobile phones, smartwatches, and other wearables are more likely targets for spying.


What does the UK government say?

A government representative refrained from commenting on specific security protocols but affirmed that “protecting national security is our utmost priority, and strict procedures are in place to ensure government sites and information are adequately safeguarded.”

A more detailed statement released last month by Defence Minister Koker, indicated that the Ministry of Defence (MOD) is collaborating with other government bodies to understand and mitigate potential security threats from all types of vehicles, not just those manufactured in China.

Further reports state that while there are no overarching policy prohibitions on the movement of Chinese-made vehicles, EVs incorporating Chinese components have been banned from sensitive military locations.

Nevertheless, individual defense entities may impose stricter requirements for vehicles in particular settings.

BYD was reached for commentary, while Xpeng stated it is “committed to upholding and complying with applicable UK and EU privacy laws and regulations.”

SMMT, a trade association representing British automakers, responded:

“Our industry is dedicated to maintaining a high standard of customer data protection, which includes the responsible use of data. Features such as apps and paired phones can be removed from vehicles based on individual manufacturers’ guidelines, ensuring drivers feel secure.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Tesla sales are slow even in the most electric vehicle-friendly areas

Norway is a thriving market for Tesla, with electric cars making up over 90% of new car sales in Scandinavian countries. Buyers in Norway are knowledgeable about batteries, charging, and range, making it a key market for Tesla where sales have remained relatively stable compared to other countries.

Global analysts expect Tesla’s worldwide sales to decline, partially due to consumer backlash against CEO Elon Musk’s involvement in the Trump administration.

Oslo urban planner Geia Rognien Ergbin initially supported Tesla but grew disillusioned with Musk’s political affiliations and data security policies. He replaced his Tesla with a cargo bike and a shared electric Volkswagen.

Tesla’s sales in Norway have declined as consumers look for alternative electric vehicle options. Competitors like Volkswagen, Volvo, BMW, and Chinese manufacturers are gaining ground in the market.

The decline in Norway’s advanced electric car market is indicative of a larger trend globally.

Tesla’s sales are declining due to reliance on limited models and increasing competition from traditional automakers offering diverse electric vehicle options.

Despite Tesla’s previous dominance, other automakers are catching up in technology and market share, impacting Tesla’s sales.

Tesla’s sales in Europe are facing challenges as consumers wait for upgraded models and explore other electric vehicle options. Musk’s political affiliations and controversial statements are also influencing consumer perception of the brand.

Consumer backlash against Musk and Tesla’s association with right-wing politics is affecting sales in Europe, particularly for the Model 3. Competitors are gaining ground in the electric vehicle market.

Some Tesla owners in Norway are feeling embarrassed about supporting the brand due to Musk’s political affiliations. Despite this, they are still using their Teslas as alternatives are not easily available.

Norway’s largest used car dealer has seen an increase in Tesla sales, despite consumer concerns about the brand. The competitive pricing and performance of Tesla cars continue to attract buyers.

Traditional automakers are introducing new electric vehicle models with advanced battery technology, posing a competitive challenge to Tesla. Consumers now have more options in the electric vehicle market.

Anusha Baiya Contributed report from New York Henrik Pryser Libell From Oslo.

Source: www.nytimes.com

$5 billion Electric Vehicle Charging Program Suspended by Trump Administration

The Trump administration has directed US states to halt the $5 billion electric vehicle charging station program, dealing another blow to the environmental movement since the president’s return to the White House.

In a notice issued on Thursday, the Federal Highways Agency (FHWA) of the Transportation Agency ordered states not to utilize funds allocated under the Biden administration’s National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure (NEVI) program.

Emily Biondi, assistant manager of planning, environment, and real estate at FHWA, wrote in a memo, “The new leadership of the Department of Transportation has chosen to reassess the policies guiding the implementation of the NEVI Formula Program.” Biondi added, “Therefore, the current NEVI Formula Program Guidance dated June 11, 2024, supersedes all previous versions of this guidance.”

Biondi further stated, “As a consequence of the withdrawal of guidance for the NEVI Formula Program, FHWA has ceased immediately the approval of all plans for electric vehicle infrastructure deployment in all states. Therefore, the updated final NEVI Formula Program is effective immediately. No new obligations will be incurred under the NEVI Formula Program until new guidance is issued and new state plans are submitted and approved.”

Biondi mentioned that existing obligations for the design and construction of charging stations will be reimbursed to prevent disruption in current financial commitments until new guidance is issued.

According to the page on the Energy Department website, the NEVI program funds states to strategically deploy EV chargers, covering up to 80% of qualified project costs.

In a report by Politico on Thursday, FHWA has removed several website pages containing information about the NEVI program.

Andrew Rogers, a former FHWA administrator under the Biden administration, stated to Politico that the memo “appears to disregard federal court rulings and multiple injunctions.”

Currently, 14 states have operational EV stations, as reported by EV Clearing House. As of November last year, there was an 83% increase in open NEVI ports from the previous quarter, with 126 public charging ports at 31 NEVI stations in nine states.

Skip past newsletter promotions

A total of 41 states have released solicitations for EV charging stations, with over 3,560 fast charging ports at more than 890 locations.

During his campaign, Trump opposed EVs, suggesting that EV supporters should “rot in hell” and that Biden’s backing of EVs would lead to a “bloodbath” in the US automotive industry.

One of the executive orders Trump signed shortly after taking office aimed to ensure that half of all new vehicles for sale in the US between 2021 and 2030 would be revoked.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Electric vehicles are limited compared to gasoline and diesel vehicles

Charging station for electric cars in British Cornwall

Mat Cardie/Getty Image

Electric vehicles (EVs) are currently limited to gasoline and diesel. And the improved reliability is more than a fossil fuel -driven car every year because of the still technology.

Robert Elliott At the University of Birmingham, his colleagues analyzed nearly 300 million records from the forced British road. MotIt indicates the status, age, and mileage of all vehicles on the road between 2005 and 2022. This covers a total of about 29.8 million vehicles.

The results showed that the average life expectancy of EVS was 18, 4 years or more, it was 16 years, exceeding the average diesel vehicle in 8 years, and in 18. At present, the average EV covers 200,000 kilometers over a lifetime, exceeding 187,000 km, where the gasoline counter part clocked up, but has not reached 257,000 km, which reaches on average.

Elliott says that the result is not only a gasoline and diesel -run alternative, but also proves that it has already defeated them. The survey also shows that long -term reliability has improved. The possibility that the EV fails and reach Scrapheap in a specific year is about six times faster than the diesel, about twice the speed of gasoline vehicles.

“The early electric car was not so good and I couldn’t trust it,” Elliott says. “But I think the main point is that technology is very rapidly improved.”

“We are not an environmental crusade. I just want to give facts. Electric vehicles and batteries have been alive, have improved their skills, and have been improved again since this research,” he says. 。

MOT data does not contain information about the amount required for maintenance and repair cars between tests, but only overall life. Other research from the United States shows The maintenance cost of an electric vehicle is about $ 0.06 per mile, but for an internal combustion engine, the value is $ 0.10 per mile.

Rachel Aldred At Westminster University in the UK, it is said that if you leave the gasoline and diesel vehicles, you will be profitable to fight climate change and air pollution, but EVs emphasize that the EV is not a silver bullet.

“It’s still a very inefficient and limited solution,” ALDRED. “If most people are avoiding a private car, lack of physical activity, road injury, and [residual] The pollution is also the same -although it is obviously much better [than petrol or diesel vehicles]。 She says walking, or equivalent cycling and public transportation should be a priority for those who can use these modes.

topic:

  • transportation/ /
  • Electric car

Source: www.newscientist.com

Executive order signed by Trump aims at electric vehicles and wind power

overview

  • President Donald Trump issued two executive orders targeting the promotion of electric vehicles and wind power by the Biden administration.
  • These technologies are crucial in combating climate change, but the orders could hinder their growth.
  • Advocates for electric vehicles and green energy criticized the decision.

On Monday, President Donald Trump significantly impacted two rapidly growing environmentally friendly technologies in the United States, electric vehicles and wind power, through two executive orders.

These orders were aimed at countering the Biden administration’s efforts to boost these technologies, which have been gaining momentum in the drive to reduce carbon emissions in the U.S. energy sector. President Trump also announced the withdrawal of the United States from the Paris Agreement, where countries commit to reducing carbon emissions to combat global warming.

One of Trump’s presidential orders rescinded several climate-focused directives, including standards on tailpipe emissions to promote electric vehicle adoption. This move was criticized by electric vehicle advocates, who argued that it could harm America’s competitiveness in the global automotive market.

Trump’s other order temporarily halted federal approvals for offshore wind energy projects in federal waters and restricted federal agencies from issuing new permits or loans for wind energy projects, both onshore and offshore. The order falsely claimed that wind power could lead to higher energy costs and harm marine life, such as whales, despite no known links according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

The orders faced backlash from advocates of electric vehicles and wind power. Jason Grumet, CEO of the American Clean Power Association, criticized the move, stating that it contradicted Trump’s goal of freeing up energy production in the U.S.

The adoption of electric vehicles and wind power has been increasing in recent years. Electric and hybrid vehicles accounted for 20% of new car sales in the U.S. in 2024, and sales are projected to continue growing. Wind power is also predicted to be a significant source of new energy capacity in the U.S. by 2050.

President Trump has been known to criticize wind power, attributing whale deaths to offshore wind projects and making unsubstantiated claims about health risks associated with wind turbines. Climate groups have warned that Trump’s executive orders could harm global environmental efforts and hinder green job growth.

Despite these challenges, advocates believe that clean technology will continue to progress, regardless of regulatory obstacles. President Trump’s orders could face legal challenges, particularly regarding California’s stricter tailpipe pollution standards, which aim to reduce air pollution and combat climate change.

Source: www.nbcnews.com

Amazon purchases UK’s largest electric truck to decrease carbon footprint

Amazon is set to deploy nearly 150 electric heavy goods vehicles in the UK to reduce carbon emissions from its delivery operations. The company has purchased over 140 electric Mercedes-Benz HGVs and eight Volvo trucks, marking the UK’s largest order for electric trucks. These vehicles will join Amazon’s fleet over the next 18 months, increasing its current electric HGV fleet from nine vehicles.

The switch to electric logistics is being supported by government funding under the Zero Emission HGV and Infrastructure Demonstrator Program (ZEHID). Amazon plans to set up fast-charging points across its UK network to keep its electric trucks operational.

Amazon’s investment in green transport is part of a £300m initiative announced in 2022 to increase its electric HGV fleet to 700 vehicles by 2025. However, challenges such as a lack of public infrastructure, high costs, and range concerns are hindering the industry-wide transition to electric HGVs.

Amazon Logistics European vice president Nicola Fyfe stated that the company’s commitment to electric vehicles aligns with its goal of achieving net zero carbon emissions by 2040. The move includes large-scale deliveries by rail and foot in city centers, expanding Amazon’s green delivery options.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Amazon’s shift towards electric vehicles represents a significant step in its sustainability efforts and commitment to reducing its environmental impact.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Life & Style: Must-Have Cold Weather Essentials to Stay Warm From Electric Blankets to Cozy Coats

aAfter a mostly mild and cloudy December, winter has finally arrived. We’ve rounded up some of the most popular and tried-and-true products to help you stay warm, especially when you don’t want to turn up the thermostat too much.


From slippers to coats and pajamas to top-of-the-line electric heaters and blankets, they’ll all help you beat the cold and even stay stylish.


The best cold weather essentials to beat the cold


electric blanket

OHS electric heated fleece overblanket

£20 at Online Home Shop

£34.99 on Amazon

This great value heater throw was rated the best budget option in 2008. emily peck Reviews of the best heated blankets. Available in blush, charcoal, forest green, and black, it comes with 9 temperature settings and a timer that turns it off after 9 hours.


heating airer

Dry: Quickly Deluxe 3-Stage Heated Airer and Cover

£149.99 on Amazon

£194.98 at Lakeland

Warm air dryers claim to dry clothes regardless of the weather without costing the earth any energy. jane hoskin We tested 12 and rated this one from Lakeland as the best overall. She says this dryer is for people who are tired of having to choose between the expense of noisy tumble dryers, dirty clothes on the radiator, and the smell of laundry that dries slowly in traditional clothes dryers. It is said to be for people who have.


electric heater

Duux Threesixty 2 Ceramic Heater

£89.99 at John Lewis

£99.99 at Currys

The mercury is dropping and the house is getting colder. But if you have your finger hovering over your central heating dial, an electric heater may be just what you need to efficiently heat your colander. pete wise We tested eight of the best, including this compact model that thoroughly heats a space while making less noise than standard fan models.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Can the Arrival of Affordable Electric Vehicles in Europe Rescue Automakers in the Automotive Industry?

aIn recent years, affordable new electric family cars have become scarce in Europe, particularly those manufactured in the EU. Campaign group Transport and Environment reports that no electric models produced domestically and priced below €25,000 (£20,740) will be available for sale across the EU in 2022-23.

However, the landscape has shifted in recent months with the introduction of new cars like the Fiat Grande Panda, Citroën ë-C3, Hyundai Instar, Dacia Spring, and Renault 5. This sudden influx has provided buyers with more options.

This change is not coincidental. As stricter EU carbon emissions targets take effect on January 1, car manufacturers are facing the need to sell more electric vehicles to avoid fines. The industry is pushing for relaxed rules, while environmentalists are advocating for a firm stance from the EU.

Globally, automakers are grappling with weak demand for both battery-powered and internal combustion engine models. This profit decline occurs at a challenging time as the industry seeks funding for the costly shift to electric vehicles (EVs).

While 2024 saw record-breaking electric vehicle sales worldwide, driven by China’s growing industry, European markets are experiencing a slowdown. Analyst Matthias Schmidt predicts a 1.4% sales decrease in the 18 largest Western and Northern European markets over the past year.

The decline can be attributed to the cessation of generous subsidies for new EVs in Germany, the largest EV market in Europe. The end of a €5,000 incentive per car has posed challenges, impacting EV sales not only in Germany but also in other countries like France.

electric car sales chart

Some automakers are faring better than others in meeting emissions targets. While Ford struggles with Cologne-made electric car sales, BMW, Stellantis, Tesla, Polestar, and Volvo are ahead of their targets, allowing them to sell “credits” to competitors.

The sales dip has put political leaders on alert, as automakers blame regulations for potential factory closures. Volkswagen announced plans to close up to three factories in Germany, while Ford is cutting jobs in Europe. This has led industry associations to lobby for relaxed emissions standards to protect jobs.

In the UK, manufacturers have successfully argued against fines, leading to calls for a unified approach. The European Automobile Manufacturers Association is urging the European Commission to provide clarity on emissions standards to safeguard jobs.

fiat grande panda. Stellantis has repeatedly halted assembly operations at its headquarters factory in Mirafiori, Italy. Photo: LaPresse/Alamy

European policymakers may consider easing emissions regulations, with discussions set to begin in January. Efforts to relax rules are being led by some EU governments.

However, concerns persist about the long-term impact of deregulation. Analysts and activists warn that relaxing targets could jeopardize European industry, allowing Chinese EV startups to gain ground in the market.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Is Jaguar’s Electric Car Launch a Decision Too Big to Make? Expert Opinion from Jaguar Land Rover

JAguar finally revealed its highly anticipated Type 00 electric car at its Miami Art Week launch event. The marketing campaign teaser video released on social media two weeks ago generated mixed opinions. Here, industry experts share their thoughts on the car, its launch, and marketing.

Jeff Dodds

Former Honda Marketing Manager, current Chief Executive of Formula E, where Jaguar competes

I recently owned a Jaguar iPace. It’s a nice car, but it didn’t bring a smile to my face. That’s what I look for in a car. Jag knows this too.

If Jaguar’s goal was to grab attention at the launch, they definitely achieved it. There was a lot of anticipation leading up to the release, and some guests were eager to see the beastly monster unveiled. It wasn’t terrible, but it was quite unique. It’s larger, bolder, and more disruptive than I expected. It will definitely turn heads. Not everyone will love it, but that’s a good thing. Inspector Morse may not go for it, but his grandson might if he just started a cybersecurity startup.

The event itself was completely different, industrial, and edgy. British grime MC and rapper Skepta may not be the typical Jaguar brand ambassador, but there he was, performing a DJ set surrounded by influencers and cultural tastemakers in downtown Miami. That’s a significant departure from the past. Maybe too much deviation? Possibly. Jaguar has quickly become a brand of conversation in the past tense, so I commend them. I believe you’ll find joy in riding the Type 0.

Ginny Buckley

Founder of UK EV buying website Electrifying.com

In Jaguar’s 90-year history, no event has created more global buzz than a controversial rebrand. Now that the dramatic Type 00 cover has been unveiled, the new logo and flashy advertising may fade from memory.

I first saw this car at a briefing session at Jaguar Land Rover’s Midland Design Studio. In my over 25 years as a motoring journalist, no car has impressed me as much as this £100,000+ all-electric GT.

Mr Buckley says the new Jaguar Type 00 concept car is “much bigger, bolder and more disruptive than we ever imagined”. Photo: Electricifying.com

Yes, it’s pink. Very pink. Presented in Miami Pink and London Blue, the car’s colors reflect the city it was revealed in and Jaguar’s British heritage.

The color is inevitably a point of focus for many critics. According to Jaguar’s design team, this color is “production ready” and could stir things up among traditional Jaguar fans if it becomes part of the final color palette.

Beyond the color, the Type 00’s design is striking with a long hood, massive grille, and front-hinged butterfly doors. Jaguar has also eliminated the rear window.

I find the Type 0 to be fresh and bold. My 15-year-old son described it as “the best,” and I take that as a compliment.

Buckley said the Miami pink color “could cause a stir among traditional Jaguar fans.” Photo: Jason Koerner/Getty Images for Jaguar

“It’s going to challenge people and be polarizing,” said Jerry McGovern, Jaguar’s Chief Creative Officer. And it will. If their aim was to spark discourse, they have succeeded.

The question now is whether Jaguar can evolve the brand rapidly enough to attract the new generation of young, affluent buyers they hope will purchase the car.

Manfredi Ricca

Global Chief Strategy Officer at brand consulting firm Interbrand. He has collaborated with Bugatti and was instrumental in the relaunch of Mini and BMW.

Flashback to two weeks ago. Jaguars weren’t particularly interesting to many. Then, a 30-second video was released. Millions of heads turned instantly. In just 24 hours, Jaguar became a global talking point without unveiling any products.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Consequently, anticipation for the new lineup, with leaks surfacing on the eve of the release, has reached the intensity and reach of a World Cup final.

Campaigns designed for brand activation don’t get much better than this. Many overlook the fact that Jaguar Land Rover wasn’t attempting to evolve a successful brand; instead, it was reinventing a struggling one.

The reality today is that there are more people who appreciate Jaguar’s history than those who actually desire a Jaguar car.

Museums can subsist solely on the past, but commercial entities can’t. Companies must transform their legacy into something that attracts enough customers willing to pay a premium.

Ricca says the Jaguar Type 00 will “tempt” potential customers. Photo: Jason Koerner/Getty Images for Jaguar

Once a trailblazing manufacturer of some of the world’s most innovative cars, Jaguar is once again adored by a few rather than ignored by many.

The concept introduced in Miami will captivate those few, but the true test lies in turning them into enthusiasts in 2025 when the car hits the market, and customers in 2026.

Richard Exon

Co-founder of advertising agency Joint, previously collaborated with Audi and Range Rover.

Jaguar deserves praise for its ambitious rebranding efforts. Making a clean break from the past is the best approach. The company aims to attract an entirely new customer base with its latest car range, and a more modern, inclusive, and daring brand strategy could prove successful.

However, good intentions aren’t enough when the execution is as lackluster as Jaguar’s pre-launch promotional video content.

Exxon said Jaguar’s rebranding video was “derivative and disappointing.” Photo: Jaguar/PA

Fortunately, the concept car images feature a bold new aesthetic that demands a fresh evaluation.

The critical next step is how well the innovative design of the concept translates into the final manufactured product available for purchase.

Jaguar’s troubled car brands seldom get second chances, so let’s hope Jaguar rises to the occasion, rebounds from the video mishap, and dares to be as unique as it aspires to be.

Source: www.theguardian.com

United Kingdom must accelerate adoption of electric cars to stay ahead of competitors

This push for electric cars isn’t about a culture war. It’s a simple choice. Can we prepare British industry to take advantage of the changes that are coming? Or will we leave it alone to let our competitors run laps until we decide whether to change our tires? Or?

The previous government, including the current opposition leader, may have been content to play politics with people’s jobs at stake by delaying the end of sales of new gasoline and diesel cars. But this government is not like that.

Prior to that, we were on track to meet the 2030 deadline and the electric vehicle mandate had wide support from industry. More than two-thirds of UK car manufacturers had already committed to a full transition to electric cars by 2030, and investment was starting to pour into building electric cars here at home.

However, the decision to delay the transition has resulted in significant costs for companies that were already gearing up to meet the 2030 deadline, dealing a major blow to our credibility and putting investment, jobs, and growth at risk.

This Government has clearly recognized the fact that if we want the car industry to survive in the UK, we need to provide certainty and confidence to investors, not change our targets.

Having grown up in Sunderland, home to the Nissan factory, I know first-hand how important the car industry is to local communities in delivering growth, jobs, and wealth creation. The UK car industry employs over 150,000 people, and its continued success plays a major role in our mission to grow the economy.

If we get this transition right and support the growth of the UK electric vehicle market, we have a huge opportunity to tap into a multi-billion pound industry that can create well-paid jobs for decades to come.

That’s why in our manifesto we committed to moving back the transition to electric cars to 2030 and phasing out the sale of new cars with internal combustion engines.

But we want to work with industry and make sure that their voice is heard on how to get there. That’s why we’re fast-tracking a consultation to see how the government can support manufacturers, investors, and the industry as a whole to achieve our goals. To be clear, the content of this consultation is how do not have if We will achieve this ambition.

Working families also benefit from this transition. EVs are becoming more affordable and practical, prices are starting to fall, they are cheaper to run and maintain, range is improving, charging infrastructure is expanding rapidly, and demand in the UK is increasing. It is increasing.

And of course, with road traffic contributing up to 30% of air pollution, a shift to electric vehicles means cleaner, healthier air for our children and future generations.

Delaying the transition will only make it harder and more expensive for the industry and families in the long run. That’s why we want to do everything possible to ensure that the next generation of zero-emissions vehicles are designed and manufactured here in the UK, are affordable and accessible to workers, and encourage the uptake of electric vehicles. That’s what I think.

That’s why the Chancellor announced more than £2 billion will be spent on producing zero-emission cars. This funding will support the latest research and development of these technologies, accelerate commercial scale-up, and enable capital investment.

On the demand side, people involved in promoting electric vehicles are concerned about the availability of charging points. That’s why we’re investing over £200m to accelerate the rollout of charging points, building on the 71,000 public charging points already available.

Skip past newsletter promotions

We are currently taking proactive steps to foster stability in this sector, but we are also developing long-term plans to ensure UK motor manufacturing can grow and thrive.

We are already seeing manufacturers embrace zero-emission vehicles and the transition to a greener economy, with governments fully supporting manufacturers. Jaguar Land Rover will move to a 100% fully electric vehicle range over the next five years, investing billions of dollars into the UK economy. At the same time, we can see Toyota investing heavily to make its UK manufacturing operations 100% carbon neutral by 2030.


When governments say decarbonization must not mean deindustrialization, we mean it. There is no path to net zero without the support of British industry and workers.

With Ford recently announcing job cuts across Europe and Stellantis proposing to close Vauxhall’s Luton factory, we’ve learned more about the global challenges facing the industry and how we’re working to help. We have no doubts about the need to play a role.

That’s exactly why I’ve been sitting around the table talking directly with industry leaders about how best to make this transition happen, and my message has always been loud and clear. The Government is listening and we will work closely with you to deliver our plans.

The bottom line is: Either we look ahead and leverage the clean energy transition to deliver growth, creating new jobs and a greener future, or we fall behind. is. This government will not make the same mistakes as the past and will not tolerate it.

Jonathan Reynolds is Secretary of State for Business and Trade.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Top 10 Electric Vehicles to Consider if You’re Looking to Steer Clear of Tesla | Automotive

pictureRon Musk is making headlines lately, with controversial posts and support for Donald Trump’s campaign. However, his negative comments are starting to affect Tesla owners, leading to a decline in sales for the second consecutive quarter in July.

Despite this, Tesla produces excellent electric cars like the latest Model 3, which is one of the best options available. Many other major and newer car manufacturers are catching up to Tesla in the electric car market. Here are the top 10 non-Tesla EVs you can buy now, excluding the upcoming Renault 5 set to launch in the UK in Q1 2025.


Most Affordable EV


Dacia Spring

from £14,995

Scope of claims Up to 140 miles

Battery size 26.8kWh

Lease A 48-month lease starts from around £152 per month, with initial costs of around £1,370. Selective Car Lease Sample lease, or OffersPrices vary when it comes to leasing, however, so we recommend you always shop around – check out our FAQs below for more information.

The Dacia Spring may not be the ultimate car in terms of refinement, but with a range of up to 140 miles and a comfortable ride, it’s perfect for city use.

There’s not a lot of space inside, but it can seat two adults and two children comfortably. The trunk is big enough for a carry-on or your weekly groceries. All models come with air conditioning, and more expensive models have a 10-inch touchscreen with wireless Apple CarPlay or Android Auto smartphone connectivity. There’s also an app that lets you control charging and turn on the heat and air conditioning before you get in the car.

Most people will avoid entry-level cars, especially since the monthly costs won’t be that high. Take out a finance deal and upgrade to a better-equipped, more powerful version, with prices not exceeding £16,995.


The Best Small EV


Volvo EX30

from £32,850

Scope of claims Up to 295 miles

Battery size 51 to 69 kWh

Lease A 48-month lease starts from around £423 per month, with initial costs of around £5,501. Lease.com Sample lease, or Volvo Cars.

Volvo’s EX30 is a smart small car that feels premium but doesn’t come with a steep price tag.

The audio system uses a full-dash sound bar instead of speakers in the doors to produce impressive sound, the window switches have been moved to the center of the car – all to save costs – and you can operate most…

Source: www.theguardian.com

For the First Time, NASA’s Endurance Mission Measures Earth’s Bipolar Electric Field

First hypothesized over 60 years ago Bipolar electric field Polar winds are the primary driver of a constant outflow of charged particles into space above the Earth’s poles. These electric fields lift charged particles in the upper atmosphere to higher altitudes than usual, and may have shaped the evolution of Earth in ways that are still unknown.



Collinson othersThey report that a potential drop of +0.55 ± 0.09 V exists between 250 km and 768 km due to the planetary electrostatic field, generated solely by the outward pressure of ionospheric electrons. They experimentally demonstrate that the Earth’s ambipolar field controls the structure of the polar ionosphere, increasing its scale height by 271%. Image courtesy of NASA.

Since the 1960s, spacecraft flying over Earth’s poles have detected streams of particles streaming from Earth’s atmosphere into space.

Theorists predicted these outflows, named them polar winds, and stimulated research to understand their causes.

Some outflow from the atmosphere was expected — intense, unobstructed sunlight should send some atmospheric particles escaping into space, like water vapor evaporating from a pot of water — but the observed polar winds were more puzzling.

Many of the particles inside were cold and showed no signs of heating, but they were moving at supersonic speeds.

“Something must be attracting these particles to the outer reaches of the atmosphere,” said Dr. Glynn Collinson, Endurance mission principal investigator and a researcher at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center.

The electric fields, hypothesized to be generated at subatomic levels, would be incredibly weak and their effects would be expected to be felt only for distances of hundreds of miles.

For decades, detecting it has been beyond the limits of existing technology.

In 2016, Dr Collinson and his colleagues began inventing a new instrument that they thought would be suitable for measuring Earth’s bipolar magnetic field.

The team’s equipment and ideas were perfectly suited for a suborbital rocket flight launched from the Arctic.

The researchers named the mission “Antarctic Expedition,” in honor of the ship that carried Ernest Shackleton on his famous 1914 Antarctic voyage. Endurance.

They set course for Svalbard, a Norwegian island just a few hundred miles from the North Pole and home to the world’s northernmost rocket launch site.

“Svalbard is the only rocket launch site in the world that can fly through the polar winds and make the measurements we need,” said Dr Susie Ingber, an astrophysicist at the University of Leicester.

Endurance was launched on May 11, 2022, reaching an altitude of 768.03 kilometers (477.23 miles) and splashing down in the Greenland Sea 19 minutes later.

Over the 518.2 kilometres (322 miles) altitude where Endurance collected data, it measured a change in electrical potential of just 0.55 volts (V).

“Half a volt is almost meaningless – it’s about the strength of a watch battery – but it’s just right for describing polar winds,” Dr Collinson said.

Hydrogen ions, the most abundant type of particle in the polar wind, experience an outward force from this field that is 10.6 times stronger than gravity.

“That’s more than enough to counter gravity, in fact to launch you into space at supersonic speeds,” said Dr. Alex Grosser, a research scientist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center and Endurance project scientist.

Heavier particles are also accelerated: an oxygen ion at the same altitude, immersed in this 0.5 volt electric field, loses half its mass.

In general, scientists have found that bipolar magnetic fields increase what’s called the scale height of the ionosphere by 271%, meaning the ionosphere remains denser up to higher altitudes than it would be without the bipolar magnetic field.

“It’s like a conveyor belt that lifts the atmosphere up into space,” Dr Collinson said.

The Endurance discovery has opened up many new avenues of exploration.

The polarity field, as a fundamental energy field of the Earth alongside gravity and magnetism, may have continually shaped the evolution of the atmosphere in ways that we are only now beginning to explore.

Because it is generated by the internal dynamics of the atmosphere, similar electric fields are expected to exist on other planets, including Venus and Mars.

“Any planet with an atmosphere should have a bipolar magnetic field, and now that we’ve finally measured it we can start to learn how it has shaped our planet and other planets over time,” Dr Collinson said.

Team result Published in a journal Nature.

_____

G.A. Collinson others2024. Earth’s bipolar electrostatic field and its role in the escape of ions into space. Nature 632, 1021-1025;doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07480-3

This article is a version of a press release from NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.

Source: www.sci.news

Perfect Time to Buy an Electric Car in the UK: Unbeatable Deals on Electric, Hybrid, and Low Emission Vehicles

IIf you’re considering trading up to an electric vehicle but think it’s too costly, think again. Used Tesla Model 3 or Kia e-Niros, capable of 250-300 miles on a single charge, can now be purchased for just £14,000.

Last year, prices for used electric vehicles dropped significantly, making previously unattainable models now accessible to many families.

In fact, Autotrader reported that EVs are now almost as affordable as petrol cars, with the average price of a three- to five-year-old EV in July being £18,964, compared to £18,076 for a petrol car of the same model year.

Ground-breaking ultra-efficient models from three to four years ago are now available on the second-hand market at much more affordable prices, despite initially costing between £40,000 and £50,000 new.

According to David Smith of Cleveleys Electric Vehicles, there are some incredible deals available, with cars offering nearly the same driving range as new models, proven reliability, and warranties still intact, all at a fraction of the price.

One EV specialist highly recommends the Kia e-Niro, especially with its 64kWh battery. Photo: Sue Thatcher/Alamy

Smith also recommended the Kia e-Niro with its 64kWh battery for families under £15,000, citing its efficiency, range, and reliability.

Another model to consider is the MG5, which has proven to be extremely reliable according to Cleveleys Electric Vehicles.

Smith mentioned that longer-range EVs are not as risky as perceived, with many cars maintaining their mileage even after extensive use.

Buying a used, fuel-efficient EV eliminates the issues that new electric vehicles may face, making them a practical choice for many buyers.

For those looking to purchase, there are several affordable options available, like the Kia e-Niro and Tesla Model 3, both offering long-distance capabilities at competitive prices.

Charging at home is much cheaper than using public charging points, making EVs even more cost-effective in the long run.

The Tesla Model 3 has proven to be capable of long distance driving. Photo: Taina Sohlman/Alamy

Consider the warranties, charging options, and overall cost before making a decision on purchasing a used EV.

Charging at home is much cheaper than using a public charging point. Photo: Christopher Thomond/The Guardian

Consider the charging infrastructure, insurance costs, and warranty coverage when buying a used EV to ensure a wise investment.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Some skeptics warn that EVs will strain the power grid, but they could actually help to solve the problem

picture
Electric cars scares some people of the dark: their batteries produce much less carbon dioxide but require more power to run, prompting ominous warnings that Britain and other wealthy countries could plunge their citizens into darkness if they ban new petrol and diesel sales.

In recent months, UK net-zero skeptic newspapers have warned that a shift to EVs “risks overwhelming the grid and causing catastrophic blackouts” if intermittent solar and wind don't provide the needed power. Another article argued that “we don't need an enemy force to plunge us all into darkness – just some electricity customers doing their normal thing on a normal winter's night.”

But many who work in the electric vehicle industry believe these fears may be unfounded, arguing that the transition to electric vehicles is an exciting, potentially lucrative opportunity to build a smarter, greener energy system.


In the UK, polluting coal-fired power plants have been largely replaced by wind farms and solar panels. These renewable energies do not emit carbon dioxide, but they suffer from intermittency problems and cannot provide enough power on cloudy days or at night when there is no wind. Add in the prospect that all new cars will be electric by 2035 and it is not an exaggerated question how the power grid will keep supply and demand in balance.

Shifting demand

The transition to electric vehicles will undoubtedly require more electricity generation as electric vehicles, rather than land-based fossil fuels, become the primary source of energy for transportation, but smart technology can be used to shift demand away from peak times, such as 5pm in winter, when demand for electricity risks outstripping supply.

This isn't just a pipe dream: home charger company MyEnergy calculates that if balancing services were enabled across all installed compatible chargers, it could “provide over 1GW of demand-shifting flexibility to the grid, more than 98% of the UK's major fossil fuel power stations.”

Octopus Energy, which has quickly grown to become the UK's largest electricity supplier, says its Go electricity tariff manages the charging of the batteries of 150,000 electric vehicles. Charging them all at once would require 1GW of power, but smart chargers hold off charging until off-peak hours at night, shifting demand away from peaks. Electricity is also cheaper during off-peak hours, with clear benefits for consumers: Octopus says its customers save an average of about £600 a year.




In the UK, polluting coal-fired power stations have largely been replaced by wind farms and solar panels, which suffer from “intermittency issues”. Photo: Martin Meissner/AP

One gigawatt is the equivalent of a medium-sized power station, enough to power 600,000 homes. Electric vehicles on UK roads are already on the rise in the UK. Peak electricity demand in winter is 61.1GWAccording to the National Grid, delaying charging for just a few hours can help reduce energy consumption.

Jack Fielder, chief strategy officer at MyEnergy, said: “If every EV charger could provide a grid balancing service and every driver took part in a grid balancing program, we could collectively eliminate periods of strain on the grid.”

It could also be useful when power supply exceeds demand, such as on warm, windy nights, said Chris Pateman-Jones, chief executive of charging company Connected Curve.

“Instead of wasting renewable energy, I see EVs as a giant sponge,” he says. For consumers, there will be little change: Connected Curve data shows that most cars are already charged by midnight, leaving them idle for hours before they're needed.

Powered by car battery

It's not just the timing of when electrons flow into car batteries that will help the National Grid Electricity Supply Operator (NGESO), the company responsible for balancing the U.K. power grid: It calls demand shifting a “low-regret action that will help reduce the impact on peak demand and reduce renewable curtailment,” but it also wants electrons to flow in the other direction.

Vehicle-to-grid technology is an attractive prospect: instead of building power plants, hydroelectric storage, or stationary battery fleets, the idea is to harness the energy stored in car batteries. Cars could become portable power packs, providing backup for homes in the event of a blackout, and even allowing drivers to earn money by selling power back to the grid.

NGESO is Annual estimate It predicts what the UK electricity system will look like in 2035 and 2050. It sees a growing role for cars feeding power back into the grid, and in the most optimistic scenario, capacity could reach 39GW (equivalent to one-tenth of the vastly expanded generating capacity).

Skip Newsletter Promotions

Source: www.theguardian.com

NASCAR Reveals Electric Race Car Prototype in Preparation for Chicago Street Race

NASCAR introduced a prototype electric race car over the weekend as part of their initiative to reduce emissions and electrify the sport.

This move represents a major step towards sustainability, which may seem contradictory to the traditional roots of stock car racing, but it is in line with NASCAR’s long-term goal of achieving net-zero operational emissions by 2035.

The debut of the vehicle is a result of a partnership with electrification and automation company ABB. NASCAR Chicago Street Race.

The ABB NASCAR EV Prototype, developed in collaboration with Chevrolet, Ford, and Toyota, is an electric stock car capable of generating a peak output of 1,000 kW (1,341 horsepower). Equipped with a regenerative braking system, the race car converts kinetic energy from braking into electricity, similar to many existing hybrid and fully electric vehicles.

Officials at ABB highlighted that NASCAR’s efforts to decarbonize and reduce carbon emissions align with the broader energy transition happening in the United States.

Chris Sigas, U.S. public affairs director for ABB, expressed, “This partnership provides us with a platform to address issues impacting our nation and the direction we are collectively moving towards.”

While there are no immediate plans to phase out internal combustion engines from stock car racing, there is potential to explore high-performance electric cars for racing, as per sources.

Both organizations will collaborate to identify areas within NASCAR racing, specific race tracks, office operations, and long-haul transportation that can transition to electrification.

Sigas added, “We will evaluate all aspects of their operations – from long-haul trucking to golf carts on the track to EV charging stations. This multi-year partnership serves as an opportunity to showcase not just NASCAR but companies nationwide on how they can enhance their sustainability efforts.”

In the previous year, NASCAR committed to achieving net-zero emissions from operations by 2035 This commitment includes prioritizing 100% renewable electricity at owned race tracks and NASCAR facilities, expanding on-site EV charging stations, and developing sustainable race fuels.

Eric Nyquist, NASCAR senior vice president, stated in a release that the collaboration with ABB will support their endeavors to decarbonize operations and work towards achieving net-zero emissions in the next decade.

Source: www.nbcnews.com

Argentina’s lithium industry accelerates to fulfill electric vehicle demand, reshaping competitive dynamics

IIn the vast white desert of Salinas Grandes, 45-year-old Antonio Carpanchay raises an axe and chips away at the earth. He has worked the land since he was 12, splitting and collecting salt, replenishing it for the next season and teaching his children to do the same.

“Our whole indigenous community works here, even the elders,” he says, shielding his sunburned face from the sun. “We’ve always done it. It’s our livelihood.”

As his son watches warily, Karpanchai points north, to a pile of black stones and mud that stands out from the stark whiteness of the plains. “They started mining for lithium in 2010,” he says. “We made them stop because they were destroying the environment and affecting the water quality. But now they’re coming back, and I’m scared. We could lose everything we have.”

Antonio Carpanchay and his son mine and sell salt in Salinas Grandes, Argentina.

The Salinas Grandes are the largest salt flats in Argentina, stretching over 200 miles and containing a biodiverse ecosystem. Sitting in the Lithium Triangle The same goes for parts of Chile and Bolivia.

Lithium is a silvery metal known as platinum and is a vital element in batteries for mobile phones and electric cars. By 2040, global demand is predicted to increase more than 40-fold. But that exploitation has also raised moral debates, pitting the transition to green energy against the rights of local and indigenous peoples.

The sign reads “No to Lithium.”

Thirty-three indigenous communities in the Atacama and Cola regions, fearful of losing or polluting their water resources and being forced off their lands, have banded together for 14 years to try to halt the mining operations. “Please respect our territory” and “No to lithium” are scrawled on dozens of road signs, abandoned buildings, and murals.

But now, with more than 30 global mining conglomerates moving into the region at the instigation of “anarcho-capitalist” President Javier Milley, the battle lines are being redrawn. Offers of jobs and investment are increasingly dividing communities, with some already reneging on agreements and more expected to follow.

“Businesses are moving in,” Karpanchai said. “I worry about my grandchildren’s future.”


TThe biggest concern for indigenous peoples is water. Approximately 2 million liters of evaporation is required per tonne of lithium. This threatens to dry up the region’s wetlands and already dry rivers and lakes. Industrial-scale pumping also threatens to contaminate fresh groundwater, endangering livestock and small-scale agriculture. The impacts will likely reach farther than the immediate source of the water: as locals say, “water knows no borders.”

Clemente Flores, a 59-year-old community leader, says water is the most important part of Pachamama, which means “Mother Earth.” “Water nourishes the air, the soil, the pastures for the animals and the food we eat,” he argues.

“If we used all the water for mining, the salt flats would dry up. We need water to grow salt. Without salt, there are no jobs,” said Karpanchai, who relies on the freshwater resources to raise llamas and sheep. “Chemicals from mining could pollute the water and pastures. We could lose everything.”

Flavia Lamas, 30, a tour guide on the salt flats, remembers when lithium companies began exploring around 2010. “They said mining lithium would not affect Mother Earth, but then water became a problem. Water was running off the salt flats and after just one month our land started to degrade,” she says.

Flavia Lamas, who guides tourists through the Salinas Grandes salt flats, compares the mining companies to the Spanish colonial army of the 1500s.

According to Pia Marchegiani, director of environmental policy at the NGO: Environment and Natural Resources Foundation (Fern) Environmental assessments leave gaps in understanding the full impact of large-scale development. “This region is a watershed. Water comes from everywhere, but nobody is looking at the whole picture,” Marchegiani says. “You have Australians, Americans, Europeans, Chinese, Koreans, but nobody is adding up their water use.”

Wildlife within the ecosystem may also be affected. A 2022 study found that flamingosLithium mining in Chile is slowly killing off coral reefs that feed on microorganisms in seawater.

Communities also fear their land will disappear. Indigenous people consider the land sacred and ancestral, and have lived on it for centuries, but they worry they will be forcibly removed. “We can’t sacrifice our community land. Do you think that’s going to save the planet? Instead, we’re destroying Mother Earth herself,” Flores says.

A painting welcoming visitors to the village of El Moreno features an anti-lithium message.

youUntil recently, the 33 communities fought together as one, but over the past year, cracks have appeared as mining companies have offered economic incentives. “Companies are approaching,” Karpanchai said. “They approach us alone, they come in disguise. People are feeling the pressure.”

Lamas says mining companies are descending on the region like conquistadors in the 1500s. “The Spanish brought mirrors as gifts. Now the miners come by truck,” she says. “We’ve been offered gifts, trucks, and houses in the city, but we don’t want to live there.”

Marchegiani accuses the companies of deploying “divide and conquer” tactics. Alicia Chalabet, an indigenous lawyer from Salinas Grandes, says the community is under “constant pressure” to agree to the demands. “We’re flooded with lithium companies here. It’s increased a lot in the last five years,” said Chalabet, who is currently handling 20 cases. “The community is just an obstacle.”

The community of Lipan was the first to agree to let mining company Rishon Energy explore the waters beneath the saltwater in exchange for promises of jobs and essential services, but some residents say the decision was controversial, and some community members claim not all residents were allowed to vote.

A facility set up by Rishon Energy to explore lithium potential near the village of Lipan. The company claims to employ staff from the local area and invest in their training.

Rishon denies that its decision to mine in Lipan was controversial and says it complied with all regulations that require it to seek local community support in lithium exploration. The company has previously told reporters that it has invested in 15 secondary school and 15 university scholarships, provided computers to local schools, and hired 12 workers from Lipan.

Anastasia Castillo, 38, grew up in Lipan and now lives in a nearby commune. She says neither she nor her parents, who remain in the village, agreed. “I’m very sad. My children’s future is ruined. We have 100 cows and 80 llamas in the area, which is my main job. I’m afraid they’ll die,” Castillo said. “Now we’re separated.”

Anastasia Castillo believes that

Source: www.theguardian.com

BYD: Chinese electric car powerhouse makes European debut in automotive industry

GGermany started Euro 2024 in Munich, known for football legend and BMW, a major German car exporter.

Unlike BMW, Volkswagen, or Mercedes-Benz, China’s BYD is the only car manufacturer sponsoring the tournament.

This move led to a 69% increase in views of BYD models on Auto Trader’s website during the tournament’s first weekend compared to the previous week.

BYD is a major competitor to Tesla, the world’s largest electric car maker, focusing on the European market where it faces threats of EU tariffs.

An electric vehicle for export waits to be loaded onto a BYD Explorer 1 at Yantai port in eastern China’s Shandong province. Photo: –/AFP/Getty Images

Despite possible tariffs, many experts believe that BYD’s expansion into the European auto market will continue.

Subsidies and tariffs

BYD may face tariffs, but its lower reliance on subsidies compared to rivals like Geely and SAIC gives it a competitive edge.

China Subsidy Graph

BYD’s innovative electric cars and advantageous pricing strategy hint at its potential for growth in the European auto market.

The company’s success as a major player in the electric vehicle market is contributing significantly to the global shift away from traditional gasoline and diesel vehicles.

Battery Advantage

BYD’s expertise in battery manufacturing, particularly its use of low-cost lithium iron phosphate chemistry, positions it as a key player in the clean energy vehicle market.

Some analysts argue that BYD’s low-cost electric cars are helping to drive a greener future. Photo: Toya Sarno Jordan/Reuters

By focusing on clean energy technologies, BYD is making significant contributions to the global transition towards sustainable mobility.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Elon Musk’s Prediction Comes True: Electric Vehicle Sales Begin to Slow Down in the Automotive Industry

ERon Musk became the richest man in the world by evangelizing electric cars and delivering one million electric cars. But in recent months, his company Tesla has struggled to maintain its momentum. This year's sales have declined and stock prices have fallen.

These struggles are emblematic of the broader situation facing the electric vehicle (EV) industry. The pace of sales growth has slowed after years of the coronavirus pandemic that sent demand and valuations soaring. The industry is entering a new phase, raising questions about whether the switch from gasoline and diesel to cleaner electricity will face a nasty stall or a temporary speed bump.

Musk acknowledged the difficulties this week, telling investors: “Globally, EV penetration is under pressure, with many other automakers pulling back from EVs and pursuing plug-in hybrids instead. ” he said. Musk, of course, insisted it was the wrong decision.




Electric vehicle charging stations in Norway, where EVs account for 90% of the market. Photo: Andreas Wirth/Alamy

However, sluggish sales are a reality. Tesla and its closest rival in electric car sales, China's BYD, have both reported declines in electric car sales. Across Europe, the share of sales of battery electric cars fell to 13% from 13.9% last year, while sales of hybrid cars, which combine a battery and an internal combustion engine, rose to 29% from 24.4%. In the UK, electric cars accounted for 15.5% of total car sales in the first three months of 2024, only a slight increase on the same period last year.

In recent years, electric car manufacturers have been able to easily sell every electric car they make. However, many companies around the world are currently struggling to cope with the end of the era of rock-bottom interest rates, when households have less money left in their pockets.

“The economic headwinds are pretty bad across the board, so it's no surprise that the economy is slowing down,” said Ian Henry, whose auto analysis consultancy works with several automakers.

Buyers still have to pay more upfront for battery cars (though most will save money by owning an electric car because energy is cheaper). Additionally, electric vehicle repair costs and insurance premiums may be higher in some locations due to a lack of mechanics. Another important factor is that the rollout of public chargers has been very patchy, giving some potential buyers pause. All of these were pounced on by EV industry skeptics, turning the industry into a culture war battleground.

government's hand

Rico Luhmann, senior sector economist for automotive at investment bank ING, said EV sales had reached a “plateau” and that after an initial rush of early adopters accustomed to switching from gas-powered cars, electric vehicle sales were on the rise. He said sales will become even more difficult. diesel.

But there is more at play in this showdown than purely economic factors. Government also plays a big role. This trend is particularly evident across Europe, where EV sales are following diverging paths even as buyers face similar pressures. Norway is an outlier. Electric vehicle sales are heavily subsidized and EVs currently account for 90% of the market. This year, EV market share also expanded in Denmark, Belgium, and France.

However, in Germany, once the largest electric car market, the adoption rate of electric cars has declined simply because the government has ended subsidies.

Regulations not only affect demand but also play a large role in the cars sold. Matthias Schmidt, a Berlin-based electric vehicle analyst, has long predicted that European electric vehicle sales growth will slow in 2024. The reason is that January 1, 2025, is the date when the EU will take the next big step towards zero-emission vehicles, meaning lower average carbon emissions. The carbon footprint of the cars sold by each manufacturer must be reduced by 15% compared to 2021.




Ford Puma. Photo: SYSPEO/Sipa/Rex/Shutterstock

Therefore, this rule is a big incentive for automakers to focus their efforts on electric vehicles next year. Schmidt argues that the European industry is experiencing a “replay” of the situation experienced in 2019 when manufacturers held back sales of electric cars before mass-launching new models in 2020.

Sure enough, automakers are releasing new mass-market models at just the right time. Renault's electric 5 hatchback will cost less than €25,000 (£21,430) when it goes on sale this autumn, while Ford plans to launch an electric version of Britain's best-selling car, the Ford Puma, later this year.

Skip past newsletter promotions

moan maker




A man helps assemble an Opel Grandland X SUV at the Opel factory in Eisenach, eastern Germany. Photo: Martin Schutt/dpa/AFP/Getty Images

Stellantis, which owns the Vauxhall, Peugeot-Fiat, and Chrysler brands, is also joining the rush, unveiling the Vauxhall/Opel Grandland electric SUV on Tuesday. Still, the company's CEO, Carlos Tavares, complained bitterly about how regulations are encouraging the switch to electric cars.

This week, he slammed Britain's Transport Secretary Mark Harper over the government's zero-emission vehicle (ZEV) mandate, which forces car manufacturers to increase the proportion of electric vehicles they sell. He later told journalists that the mandate was a “terrible” policy because it would force automakers to introduce electric models too quickly.

“The result of this is that everyone starts pushing BEVs (battery electric vehicles), pushing metals into the market, completely destroying profitability and destroying businesses,” he said.

Schmidt said the automakers’ complaints could have ulterior motives. EU rules will ban the sale of most internal combustion engines by 2035 but are expected to be revised in 2026.

“Many manufacturers are now complaining that it's unrealistic to meet these goals, but that's lobbying by stealth,” Schmidt said. “They do it so often that it's almost like a boy-werewolf affair. There’s definitely an ulterior motive to their moans.”

But other manufacturers have already delayed that shift, which means extending the sales period for still-profitable gasoline models. In the United States, General Motors postponed production at a plant in Michigan last year, and Ford also postponed construction of a plant in Kentucky. And in the UK, luxury car maker Bentley announced last month that it would postpone the launch of its first battery car by one year, until 2026.

“Manufacturers are definitely struggling strategically at the moment,” Luhmann said. “They're playing around with the timing of the model right now, but they're not delaying it too much. If they don't, they're going to miss out in terms of market share.”

Perhaps the biggest reason why European and American automakers are unlikely to switch gears toward EVs is China. China sales growth may have slowed in the first quarter of 2024 compared to a year ago, but still exceeded 1 million units, according to industry data cited by Reuters. Many Chinese automakers, including leader BYD and cash-rich new entrants such as mobile phone maker Xiaomi, are fighting to dominate their home market and capture a new role as the world's biggest car exporter. There is.

During a recent visit to China, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz spoke out against protectionism, keenly aware that imposing penalties on Chinese EVs would lead to swift retaliation against German automakers, but that Chinese manufacturers remain He said there needs to be access to the market.

Massive competition is fierce for electric car makers, with even Tesla having to cut prices to keep selling its cars. The competition will give auto industry executives sleepless nights and could force some companies to face mergers or bankruptcies, causing job losses. But prices could fall even further, making electric cars cheaper than gasoline cars.

“This is potentially good for consumers,” Ian Henry said. “Whether that's a good thing for manufacturers who are trying to make a profit is another question.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Threat to great apes from mining for electric car batteries

Noise pollution, habitat loss and disease spread associated with mining could threaten chimpanzee populations in some African countries

Ali Wid/Shutterstock

More than a third of Africa's great apes are threatened by soaring demand for minerals essential to creating green energy technologies such as electric vehicles.

Africa has about one-sixth of the world's remaining forests, and its habitat is in countries such as Ghana, Gabon, and Uganda. The continent is also home to his four species of great apes: chimpanzees, bonobos, and two gorillas.

However, many of these great apes live in areas that mining companies are eyeing as potential places to extract goods. for example, More than 50 percent of the world's cobalt and manganese reserves are found in Africa22 percent of graphite.

To assess the scale of the threat to great ape populations, Jessica Juncker Researchers at Re:wild, a non-profit conservation organization in Austin, Texas, analyzed available data on the location of operating and planned mines and the density and distribution of great ape populations across 17 African countries. Superimposed.

The research team considered both direct impacts on great ape populations, such as noise pollution, habitat loss, and disease spillover, as well as indirect disturbances, such as building new service roads, to A 50km “buffer zone” was created around the area. And infrastructure.

A total of 180,000 great apes, just over a third of the continent's population, may be threatened by mining activities, researchers have found.

The West African countries of Liberia, Sierra Leone, Mali, and Guinea had the greatest overlap between great ape populations and mining sites. In Guinea, a study found that 83 percent of the great ape population could be affected by mining.

Juncker said the team was only considering industrial mining projects. The threat may be even greater when considering the impact of man-made mines, where miners typically work in primitive and often dangerous environments.

Cobalt, manganese, and graphite are all used to make lithium-ion batteries that power electric vehicles. Other materials found in these countries, such as bauxite, platinum, copper, graphite, and lithium, are used to power hydrogen, wind turbines, solar panels, and other green technologies.

Juncker argues that companies should stop mining in areas important to great apes and instead focus on recycling these important materials from waste. “There is great potential in metal reuse,” she says. “All we need to do is consume more sustainably. Then it will be possible to leave at least some of the areas that are so important to great apes intact.”

She is also calling on mining companies to publicly conduct biodiversity assessments of potential mining sites. “Increasing transparency is the first step.”

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Is the weight of electric cars causing strain on UK roads, bridges and car parks?

Cars have weight issues. The example of the Mini, designed to save fuel during rationing, highlights this trend. The size of cars is increasing, especially with the surge in popularity of SUVs.

Electric cars may look similar to traditional cars for now, but the key difference is the heavy battery they carry.

In our series debunking electric vehicle myths, we address common misconceptions about EVs, including range anxiety, carbon emissions, mining, and air pollution. In this final episode, we investigate whether electric cars will be too heavy for our roads and infrastructure.

Claim

As roads have evolved over time, concerns have arisen about whether electric cars will strain infrastructure like roads, bridges, and parking lots due to the weight of their batteries.

Matthew Lin, a columnist for the Daily Telegraph, recently questioned the readiness of charging infrastructure and the capacity of roads and bridges to handle heavier vehicles.

Conservative MP Greg Knight urged the UK government to test the structural integrity of multi-storey car parks and bridges against the added weight of electric vehicles.

The Asphalt Industry Alliance warned that small roads could suffer more potholes, while the Daily Mail suggested that multi-storey car parks might be at risk of collapse due to the weight of electric vehicles.

Science

Electric cars can be quite heavy. For example, General Motors’ Hummer weighs over four tons, with a significant portion of that weight attributed to its battery pack. On the other hand, the Tesla Model Y, a more affordable electric car, weighs 2 tons, still lighter than some traditional vehicles like the Range Rover or Ford F-150.

The Tesla Model Y weighs 2 tons, lighter than a Range Rover or Ford F-150. Photo: Brendon Thorne/Getty Images

According to a transport and environment advocacy group, EVs are on average 300-400kg heavier than traditional vehicles. The weight of the battery increases by approximately 100kg for every 150km of range.

The increased weight of electric cars leads to more road wear and faster deterioration of roads. However, a study found that the wear is primarily caused by heavy vehicles like buses and trucks, rather than cars and motorcycles.

Road wear is primarily caused by heavy vehicles like buses, rather than cars or motorcycles. Photo: Joe Giddens/Pennsylvania

Regarding bridges, most in the UK can support vehicles weighing up to 7.5 tonnes, with a safety margin built into the design. There are no concerns about national highways, which are built to accommodate heavy goods vehicles.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Are there any precautions?

There are limitations to the weight of electric vehicles, especially in older car parks. While newer facilities can accommodate heavier vehicles, older structures may require reinforcement to handle the increased weight.

Options for multi-storey car park owners include strengthening the building or reducing the number of cars on each floor, which can impact profits.

Regular inspections are essential for car park owners to ensure the structural integrity of their buildings amid the transition to heavier electric vehicles.

Governments could encourage smaller cars through policies such as taxes and parking fees. Photo: Christopher Thomond/The Guardian

It’s worth noting that advancements in battery technology may address the weight concerns of electric vehicles in the future. Continued progress in battery energy density could lead to lighter EVs in the long run.

Encouraging smaller cars through policy measures like taxes and fees can have additional benefits beyond reducing road wear, such as resource conservation, carbon emission reductions, and improved parking lot management.

While EVs are heavier than traditional vehicles, it’s unlikely that their weight will significantly impact road infrastructure. Concerns about weight should not overshadow the importance of transitioning to zero-emission vehicles.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Is the potential for more powerful electric bikes cause for concern over increased fire risk?

The UK Government has initiated a consultation to gather public and industry input on increasing the legal power of electric bike models from 250W to 500W in the UK. This move has sparked concerns in the fire protection community.

Electric bicycles utilize various types of batteries, with lithium-ion technology being the common choice. These batteries come in different shapes and sizes, such as cylindrical or box-shaped configurations.

Battery packs in electric bikes are composed of multiple cells connected in series and parallel to provide the necessary voltage and capacity. Incidents of fires linked to lithium-ion batteries are on the rise, posing risks to users of electric bikes and e-scooters.

Recent data disclosed in May 2023 by the Guardian newspaper revealed that defective electric bikes and e-scooters have caused injuries to 190 individuals and claimed eight lives in the UK. The London Fire Brigade noted a substantial increase in battery-related fires in 2023, with a rise of 78% compared to the previous year.

Potential causes of fires in lithium-ion batteries include mechanical or thermal shock, overcharging, and reactive materials interacting with each other, leading to heat generation and abnormal electrical behavior. Despite the benefits of higher wattage batteries in electric bikes, there are concerns about the increased risk of fires and other safety issues.

To mitigate the risk of battery fires, users are advised to avoid tampering with batteries, charge them within the recommended parameters, and store them in a safe environment away from flammable materials. Adherence to manufacturer guidelines and proper disposal of damaged batteries are crucial in preventing incidents of fires.

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

EPA introduces new regulations to decrease carbon emissions and encourage the use of electric vehicles and hybrids

The Biden administration revealed updated vehicle emissions standards on Wednesday, described as the most ambitious effort yet to reduce global warming emissions from passenger vehicles.

While the new regulations relax the original tailpipe limits proposed last year, they will ultimately align more closely with the stringent standards established by the Environmental Protection Agency.

These standards will be enforced in conjunction with the sale of electric vehicles, which must meet the requirements. The auto industry had opposed the EPA’s initial standards, announced in April last year, citing a slowdown in sales growth. The administration, however, remains committed to its ambitious plans to decrease emissions from passenger cars contributing to global warming.

Under the finalized rule, the EPA will mandate that by 2032, 56% of new vehicle sales should be electric vehicles, with at least 13% being plug-in hybrids or partially electric vehicles, along with more fuel-efficient gasoline-powered cars that get higher mileage.

The EPA estimates that these new standards will result in annual savings of $100 billion, over 7 billion tons of avoided global warming carbon emissions over the next three decades, reduced healthcare costs, fewer deaths, and more than $60 billion in healthcare savings, ultimately leading to overall cost savings in fuel, maintenance, and repairs.

On January 2, 2008, exhaust gas blows out of a car’s tailpipe in San Francisco.
David Paul Morris/Getty Images File

The EPA rule pertains to model years between 2027 and 2032, covering new emissions from new passenger cars, light trucks, pickup trucks, as well as greenhouse gas emissions like nitrogen oxides and particulate matter that contribute to global warming. It will also significantly reduce other forms of air pollution. The EPA asserts that the rule will help combat the climate crisis by substantially decreasing air pollution while promoting the adoption of cleaner vehicle technologies. The finalization of the rules follows a record increase in sales of clean vehicles, including plug-in hybrids and fully electric vehicles, last year.

The revised rules will push back the strict pollution standards’ implementation from 2027 to 2029 after the auto industry argued against the feasibility of the proposed benchmarks. By 2032, the rules will be bolstered to nearly meet the EPA’s recommended thresholds.

EPA Administrator Michael Regan affirmed to reporters that the final rule will yield pollution reductions equal to or greater than those outlined in the proposal. In addition to addressing carbon pollution, Regan emphasized that the ultimate standard will also lessen other severe air pollutants contributing to heart attacks, respiratory issues, exacerbating asthma, and diminishing lung function.

Regan stressed the critical nature of these new standards for public health, American jobs, the economy, and the planet. The standard is designed to be technology-neutral and performance-based, granting auto and truck manufacturers the flexibility to choose pollution control technology that aligns with their customer needs while meeting environmental and public health objectives.

The adjustments in the regulations seem aimed at addressing the strong industry resistance to the accelerated adoption of electric vehicles and the public’s hesitation to fully embrace new technology. Legal challenges in conservative courts also pose a legitimate threat.

With a conservative majority, the Supreme Court has increasingly restricted the power of federal agencies, including the EPA, in recent years. The court has limited the EPA’s ability to combat air and water pollution, further hindering their capability to regulate carbon dioxide emissions from power plants that contribute to global warming.

President Joe Biden has made fighting climate change a central feature of his presidency, with a focus on reducing carbon dioxide emissions from gasoline-powered vehicles, the largest source of greenhouse gas emissions in the U.S.

To achieve these goals, a Democratic president needs cooperation from the auto industry and political backing from auto workers, a crucial voting bloc. The United Auto Workers union, supporting Biden, endorses the transition to electric vehicles but aims to safeguard jobs and ensure that industry pays competitive wages to workers involved in producing EVs and batteries.

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre expressed confidence in the EPA’s final rule, stating that the administration understands that achieving such goals takes time and remains committed to climate action.

Source: www.nbcnews.com

The Rise of Norway as an Electric Car Leader: Exploring Oil Money, Civil Disobedience, and a-ha’s Molten

Kneeling in the snow outside the King’s house with a man named Harald and an electric car, imitating a heartthrob from the 1980s is quite an unconventional situation that definitely needs some explanation.

The King of Norway is also named Harald, but the man with me outside the monarch’s mansion in Stavanger is not a king. I’m here to explore Norway’s prominence in adopting electric cars as a solution to combat CO2 emissions from transportation. Norway has emerged as a global leader in this field with a significant percentage of electric cars being sold in recent years.

On the other hand, the UK has extended its ban on new petrol and diesel cars, while the situation in the EU regarding electric car sales remains below par. Stavanger, Norway’s third-largest city, stands out as an oil hub that has made significant strides towards zero-emission transport through initiatives like electric buses and vehicles.

The man accompanying me, Harald Nils Rostvik, an architect and urban planning professor, has been a driving force behind Norway’s electric vehicle revolution for decades. His pioneering efforts date back to the introduction of one of Norway’s first electric cars in 1989, marking the beginning of a journey towards sustainable transportation.


IIn 1983, former Norwegian Prime Minister Gro Harlem Brundtland spearheaded the Brundtland Commission, which laid the foundation for sustainable development and environmental awareness. Rostvik’s advocacy for electric vehicles and civil disobedience campaigns with environmental activists like Morten Halkett and Mags Furholmen, members of the iconic pop group a-ha, reshaped the narrative around electric cars in Norway.

Their efforts, including importing one of the country’s first electric cars, paved the way for a shift towards greener transportation methods. Despite facing challenges and fines for their activism, their perseverance and innovative spirit contributed to Norway’s evolving landscape of electric mobility.

(from left) Morten Halkett, Harald Nils Rostvik, Frederik Hauge, Mags Furholmen.

The legacy of their early advocacy continues to shape Norway’s EV landscape, with ambitious goals of achieving 100% electric car sales by next year. The collaborative efforts of individuals like Rostvik and prominent figures like Halkett have been instrumental in driving Norway towards a sustainable future of zero-emission transport.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Apple withdraws plans for multi-billion dollar electric car production

Apple has decided to cancel its plans to develop electric cars, as reported by multiple outlets. The project, known as Project Titan, was a secret endeavor that has utilized significant resources over the past decade. During an internal team meeting on Tuesday, company executives unexpectedly announced layoffs and mentioned that many employees would be reassigned to work on generative artificial intelligence, according to reports.


Apple had invested billions of dollars in developing an electric semi-autonomous car under Project Titan, and the decision to scrap the program represents a significant shift from its previous strategy.

Apple’s CEO Tim Cook had hinted at the company’s car plans in an interview, but did not fully commit to delivering the product as anticipated.

Although Apple never officially confirmed plans for a car, the project sparked speculation in the auto and tech industries. The company even hired executives from major car manufacturers like Lamborghini and Tesla, and acquired a self-driving car startup called Drive.ai in 2019.

Apple did not provide any official statement regarding the termination of the program, leaving many employees who had worked on the project surprised and potentially facing job cuts.

The company’s electric vehicle plans have undergone several changes since their initiation in 2014, facing numerous setbacks in attempts to bring the product to market.

In response to Apple’s decision, Tesla CEO Elon Musk posted a salute and cigarette emoji.

Apple is now focusing more on generative AI projects, reallocating researchers and engineers from the automotive field to special projects within the company.

During a quarterly financial results announcement, Cook hinted at Apple’s increased emphasis on artificial intelligence and the introduction of generative AI capabilities for consumers by the year’s end.

Source: www.theguardian.com