Wikipedia’s Founder Responds to Elon Musk’s Criticism, Denying ‘Left-Wing Activist’ Claims

Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales has dismissed Elon Musk‘s assertions that the online encyclopedia possesses a left-wing bias, labeling the Tesla and X owner’s comments as “factually incorrect.”

In December 2024, Musk urged his over 200 million followers on his social media platform X (formerly Twitter) to cease donations to Wikipedia, referring to the site as “Walkpedia.

In September, he announced plans to launch his own version, Grokipedia, through his AI company xAI, claiming it would represent “a vast improvement on Wikipedia.”

Speaking on the BBC Science Focus podcast, Wales stated that Musk’s accusations “make absolutely no sense,” though he acknowledged that Wikipedia’s volunteer community is not entirely free of bias. “The notion that we’ve turned into some kind of crazy left-wing activist platform is simply incorrect,” he explained. “This doesn’t mean there aren’t areas where we can improve.”

Wales continued, “The right solution is to involve more people. I want kinder, more thoughtful individuals who notice bias in Wikipedia entries to realize it’s not the product of some overzealous activist who will block you for disagreeing. People are just relying on sources, which may not take all perspectives into account.”

Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales welcomes “kind and thoughtful” conservatives into the Wikipedia community – Credit: Getty

Musk’s criticism of Wikipedia escalated in January following the circulation of a video from a rally celebrating President Donald Trump’s inauguration. Several users on X suggested that Musk’s gesture appeared akin to a Nazi salute. Musk rejected this interpretation and criticized a Wikipedia entry about the incident, which some claimed drew parallels to the gesture. He reposted an article from X, accusing Wikipedia of perpetuating “legacy media propaganda.”

Wales responded on X, stating that the article accurately reflected verifiable facts: “It’s true that you made that gesture (twice), it’s true that people compared it to a Nazi salute (many), and it’s true that you denied any intention behind it. That’s a fact—all elements of it.”

Musk later tweeted:

Legacy media propaganda is considered a “valid” source by Wikipedia, so of course it is simply an extension of legacy media propaganda. https://t.co/lwQlM51FRX

Wikipedia’s editing guidelines mandate that all entries are written from a neutral perspective, meaning that “all significant views published by reliable sources on a topic must be represented fairly and without editorial bias.” Wales emphasized in the BBC interview that Wikipedia welcomes contributors from all political perspectives as long as they adhere to neutrality rules. “If someone is a kind, thoughtful conservative intellectual, we would love for them to join Wikipedia,” he remarked. “But if someone is a zealous activist with an agenda, I would consider them ‘boring and annoying.’

“Don’t assume just because Elon calls us Walkpedia that we’ve found a new home in Woke,” he added.

Grokipedia was initially slated for launch on October 20, but Musk claimed it was delayed “to clear out propaganda.” He asserted that the site would be live by the end of the week; however, it remains offline as of this writing.

BBC Science Focus reports that Musk’s team did not respond to requests for comment.

Read more:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Elon Musk Responds Rashly After NASA Reveals Plans to Source Lunar Lander from SpaceX Competitor

NASA’s Acting Administrator Sean Duffy seems to have drawn the ire of Elon Musk.

Elon Musk, founder and CEO of SpaceX, took to social media on Tuesday to criticize Mr. Duffy’s intelligence and recent actions as the leader of the space agency.

“Sean Dummy is trying to destroy NASA!” Musk stated on X, using a derogatory nickname for the acting administrator. In another post, he remarked: “There’s no way the leader of America’s space program can have a double-digit IQ.”

On Monday, Duffy announced that NASA is considering utilizing a lunar lander from a SpaceX competitor to help return astronauts to the moon before China establishes its presence there.

NASA initially planned to use SpaceX’s next-generation Starship rocket system for the lunar landing.

Musk conducted a poll on Tuesday asking his followers on X: “Should someone whose greatest achievement is climbing trees lead America’s space program?” One option was, “Yes, chimpanzees are good at it!” while the other suggested, “No, he needs More Brains!”

By Tuesday afternoon, the poll had garnered around 110,000 votes.

In 2021, SpaceX secured a $2.9 billion contract to use its Starship rocket to land two astronauts on the moon during NASA’s Artemis III mission, aimed for a 2027 launch.

However, Musk’s company has faced delays in the testing and development of Starship, which experienced several explosions this year.

Meanwhile, political pressure is mounting as the competition with China escalates; the nation is targeting a moon landing by 2030 and has already dispatched two robotic probes and tested a new rocket for manned lunar missions.

Duffy appeared on Fox News and CNBC on Monday, stating that NASA would expand the Artemis III contract, inviting proposals from rival space companies to maintain U.S. competitiveness against China.

“We are not going to wait for a single company,” Duffy reiterated in an appearance on CNBC’s “Squawk Box.” on Monday. “We are focused on moving forward and winning the second space race against China.”

Duffy mentioned his and President Donald Trump’s goal to return astronauts to the moon during Trump’s second term.

He cited Blue Origin, the space launch company founded by Jeff Bezos, as a potential competitor capable of providing unique technology.

This statement appeared to antagonize Musk.

In a subsequent post, Musk questioned the ability of other commercial space firms to meet such stringent deadlines.

“In comparison to other space industries, SpaceX is advancing at remarkable speed,” he asserted. “Moreover, Starship will ultimately execute the full lunar mission. Mark my words.”

In reality, SpaceX is so ahead of its rivals that it is already conducting regular NASA missions to transport astronauts and cargo to the International Space Station.

Reacting to Musk’s remarks, Duffy replied on X: “Love the enthusiasm. The race to the moon is on. Great companies should welcome challenges. Competition among innovators benefits America!”

However, Musk’s tirade on Tuesday took a personal turn, questioning Duffy’s competence to lead NASA. Duffy is temporarily in charge of the agency; a Wall Street Journal report suggested he is positioning himself to continue in that role alongside his responsibilities as transportation secretary.

The report indicated that Duffy is contending against billionaire Jared Isaacman, who may reemerge as a candidate for the NASA leadership position. Trump had retracted Isaacman’s nomination in May, just ahead of an anticipated confirmation vote. This withdrawal followed what the president described as a “thorough review of prior connections.” (Trump did not elaborate, but some Republicans had expressed reservations that Isaacman previously donated to Democrats.)

Musk has shown support for Isaacman, who has made two orbital flights on commercial SpaceX missions.

NASA spokesperson Bethany Stevens informed NBC News that President Trump has asked Duffy to consult with potential administrators, and that the interim administrator “will be glad to assist by evaluating candidates and providing honest feedback.”

“Sean is thankful to the president for this opportunity to lead NASA,” Stevens stated. “At the president’s direction, Sean is committed to ensuring America returns to the moon before China. He has indicated that NASA’s integration into the Cabinet, possibly even the Department of Transportation, might be beneficial, though he has never claimed he wishes to continue in this role.”

The White House did not respond to inquiries for comment.

The timing of Isaacman’s controversy in May coincided with a public feud between Trump and Musk, which escalated before the SpaceX CEO departed the White House on a special public service assignment. Musk’s departure was fraught with tension as he criticized President Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill,” labeling it a “huge, outrageous, pig-filled Congressional spending plan” and a “distasteful, ugly bill” that would exacerbate the budget deficit.

playing cards We welcomed Duffy in July. Becomes interim administrator of NASA.

Source: www.nbcnews.com

Zelda Williams Responds to AI-Generated Video of Her Late Father: “Stop This” | Robin Williams

Zelda Williams, the daughter of the late actor and comedian Robin Williams, has voiced her opposition to AI-generated content featuring her father.

“Please, stop sending videos of dad generated by AI,” Zelda posted on my Instagram story on Monday. “Stop assuming that I want to see it or that I’m interested; I don’t, I really don’t. If you’re just trying to annoy me, I encounter something worse, I block it and move on.”

“To reduce the legacy of real individuals to something like, ‘Just this vague appearance and sound, that’s sufficient,’ is disheartening.”

“You’re not creating art; you’re producing grotesque, over-processed versions of human life, derived from art and musical history.”

“And for heaven’s sake, stop referring to it as the ‘future’; AI is merely a mishmash of recycled content that badly reflects the past. It’s integrating superficial human content.”

Robin Williams with Zelda at the premiere of his film RV in 2006. Photo: Mario Anzuni/Reuters

This isn’t the first instance where Zelda Williams, an actor and filmmaker who directed the 2024 horror-comedy Lisa Frankenstein, has addressed the recreation of her father, who passed away at 63 in 2014. The potential for realism is concerning.

“I’ve encountered AI imitating his ‘voice’ and saying what people want to hear. While I find this intrusive personally, the implications extend far beyond my own sentiments.”

“These recreations are inferior imitations of great individuals and, at their worst, resemble horrifying Frankenstein-like constructs formed from the industry’s lowest points.”

Zelda’s recent commentary arrives amidst a surge of celebrity deepfakes on social media, which span various themes, including adult content, political messages, scams, and advertisements.

In January, actress Scarlett Johansson highlighted the “immediate dangers of AI” following her condemnation of Kanye West’s anti-Semitic comments, after deepfake videos surfaced featuring other prominent Jewish celebrities like Jerry Seinfeld, Drake, and Adam Sandler.

A fraudulent advertisement featuring Deepfark in August was falsely attributed to Crowded House frontman Neil Finn, who stated he was incorrectly represented discussing erectile dysfunction, prompting the band to issue a disclaimer.

The deepfakes of Robin Williams are part of a larger trend in AI-generated content, fueled by the rapid proliferation of low-quality material produced by entertainment-free generation AI applications.

The recent TikTok video featuring Robin Williams appears to have been created using Sora 2, OpenAI’s new video generation app, and includes a simulated interaction between the comedian and the late Betty White.

Within days of launch, Sora’s feed was inundated with videos featuring copyrighted characters from series like SpongeBob SquarePants, South Park, Pokémon, and Rick and Morty.

OpenAI informed the Guardian that content owners can report copyright violations through a “copyright dispute form,” although individual artists and studios cannot opt out broadly. Varun Shetty, Head of Media Partnerships at OpenAI, commented:

Source: www.theguardian.com

Openai responds to Elon Musk’s allegations of “illegal harassment” against the company

Elon Musk, the billionaire, was rebutted by ChatGpt developer Openai, who accused him of harassing the company. Openai requested a US federal judge to intervene and halt Musk’s “illegal and unfair behavior” towards the company.

Established in 2015 by Musk and CEO Sam Altman, Openai has seen ongoing disputes between the two founders, transitioning from a complex non-profit structure to a more conventional for-profit business.

Musk criticized the restructuring plan about a year ago, alleging that it betrayed the company’s fundamental mission by prioritizing profits over human interests. Although Musk withdrew the lawsuit in June, he filed a new one in August.

In February of this year, Musk led a consortium of investors in a surprising $97.4 billion bid for the company. Altman promptly rejected the offer, mentioning that Musk had acquired Twitter for $44 billion, rebranded as X in 2022.

In a recent filing in California’s district court, Openai accused Musk of using various tactics to harm the company, including press attacks, malicious campaigns to Musk’s large social media following, demands for access to corporate records, legal harassment, fake bids on Openai’s assets, among others.

Openai urged the judge to put a stop to Musk’s attacks and hold him accountable for the damages he has caused. The trial is set to commence in the spring of 2026.

Musk left Openai in 2018 and founded his own company, Xai. This year’s bid for Openai had the backing of Xai and other investment firms, including one led by Joe Lonsdale, a co-founder of Spy Technology Company Palantir.

Tesla executives have criticized Openai for deviating from its original charitable mission by creating a for-profit subsidiary to raise funds from investors like Microsoft. Despite its nonprofit beginnings, Openai argues that new models are required to advance the development of superior AI models.

Recently, Openai secured $400 billion in funding rounds from investors like SoftBank, valuing the company at $300 million. The funds will be used to further AI research, enhance computer infrastructure, and provide enhanced tools for the millions of people using ChatGPT weekly.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Since the viral success of ChatGpt in 2022, Openai has encountered various corporate controversies. In 2023, the board removed Altman, citing issues with his communication transparency. After much internal unrest, Altman was reinstated within a week following threats of resignation from many company members.

Source: www.theguardian.com