Book Club shares their thoughts on Larry Niven’s Ringworld
Eugene Powers/Alamy
Experiencing the vibrant world created by Michel Nieva in his dystopian vision was something special—even more so while exploring Larry Niven’s classic science fiction work, Ringworld. Initially published in 1970, it reflects the hallmark traits of that era’s science fiction writing. While not a negative experience, it certainly offers a jarring shift for the New Scientist Book Club. Revisiting Ringworld as an adult from my teenage years prompted me to reflect on how it held up over time.
It’s important to note that much of what I cherished from Ringworld remains intact. The novel still evokes a sense of wonder, showcasing the depth of imagination, the expansive scale of its universe, and the cosmic distances it portrays. I fondly remember our protagonist, Louis Wu, at the brink of a distant planet, captivated by the Longfall River cascading into the highest waterfall in known space. His gaze followed it through the foggy mist, enthralled by the allure of the unknown.
Its grand scope is a significant aspect of why science fiction resonates with me. What insights can one gain, and what remains uncharted? The haunting imagery of razor-sharp sunflowers on Ringworld—the crew’s exploration of its vastness—created indelible impressions. Ringworld encapsulates that sense of wonder perfectly with lines like, “Men can lose their souls among the white stars… They call it A distant look. It’s perilous.”
Furthermore, I appreciated Niven’s ability to weave historical breadcrumbs into the narrative, referring to influential figures like Freeman Dyson, who inspired the concept of the Dyson sphere, as “one of the ancient natural philosophers, predating even the atomic age.” Such details are enjoyable nuggets to uncover. Additionally, Niven’s portrayal of aliens—from speakers to creatures—brilliantly evokes their essence through clever naming and design, particularly the inspiring vision of the speaker as a colossal version of our domestic cat.
As I previously mentioned, the prose does feel distinctly rooted in its time—somehow dated—with sexist undertones amidst the engaging scientific elements and intricate mathematics. The characters tend to lack depth; Louis Wu, for instance, can be quite off-putting, while Teela, our sole female character, deserves more agency. The narrative often drifts rather than following a tightly plotted journey, with characters simply moving from one event to the next without clear direction.
Intense discussions have emerged within our Facebook group, with many sharing similar sentiments. “I found enjoyment, yet felt distracted by the slow progression and the scientific facets overshadowed by the pervasive sexism,” remarked Eliza Rose, who likened it to early spy films where attractive women exist merely as accessories to the male protagonists.
Alain Pellett expressed distinct discomfort regarding Louis Wu’s treatment of women, noting that his interactions come off as unsettlingly superficial.
Gosia Furmanik, who grew up during Niven’s era, pointed out the challenge faced by non-male authors in finding supportive literary spaces. She stated, “Returning to science fiction after discovering works by authors beyond this genre’s prevalent pitfalls has been crucial,” reflecting on Ringworld in her review.
Undoubtedly, the arc of Teela’s character drew significant criticism from many readers. “I was frustrated with the conclusion of Teela’s storyline, which suggested women can only achieve significance through male figures,” wrote Samatha Lane.
Samantha also addressed a pivotal critique regarding the notion that “human males stand as the most astute beings in the universe.” This hubris roots itself in traditional humanism, positioning humanity at the center of all. This echoes the ongoing narrative surrounding our historical conquests in space—just a year after landing on the moon.
On a positive note, Niall Leighton spoke highly of the sheer scale of the novel, noting it hasn’t aged as poorly as some science fiction from that time.
Some readers appreciated Niven’s rigorous incorporation of mathematics into the narrative, stating it added an enjoyable layer to the experience. Linda Jones noted, “It has certainly enriched my enjoyment,” whereas Darren Rumbold found Klemperer Rosettes “particularly appealing.” However, not all shared this enthusiasm, as Phil Gersky commented, “I was eager to delve into this classic sci-fi novel. Unfortunately, the technobabble often marred my experience.”
Ultimately, I believe our Book Club’s exploration of this science fiction classic serves as a fascinating exercise capable of resonating with modern readers. I’m contemplating a journey into another classic soon, with suggestions pouring in from members eager to explore works by Ursula K. Le Guin, NK Jemisin, and Joan D. Vinge.
Next, we’re diving into a more contemporary read: Karian Bradley’s bestselling time travel novel, Time Saving. Yes, it features a female lead, and indeed, it passes the Bechdel Test. You can visit Karian’s site to read more about her novel and explore the intriguing opener. Join us for the discussion and share your thoughts over at our Facebook page.
Topics:
Source: www.newscientist.com
