How Neolithic People Transported Stonehenge’s Massive Altar Stones Across Britain

Recent research conducted by archaeologists at Curtin University and Sheffield Hallam University indicates that Neolithic communities, rather than glaciers, were responsible for transporting Stonehenge’s iconic six-tonne sandstone Altar Stone from north-eastern Scotland to Salisbury Plain.

Stonehenge. Image credit: Sally Wilson.

Curtin University researcher Dr. Anthony Clarke stated, “Our findings indicate that transporting the Altar Stone involved meticulous planning over multiple stages.”

“Instead of being carried naturally by ice, our evidence points to a calculated movement across various challenging terrains.”

“Our simulations suggest that during the last Ice Age, while glaciers might have transported rocks to Dogger Bank in the North Sea, they did not reach southern England. Therefore, prehistoric people had to move the stones hundreds of kilometers manually.”

“This study reveals no feasible glacier route connecting the source area to Stonehenge, thus confirming the necessity of human transport.”

“This implies that the stones may have been transported in stages, potentially utilizing a combination of land and water transport methods.”

The research incorporated mineral dating, geological provenance analysis, and computer simulations of ancient ice sheet movements to understand how the Altar Stones came to rest on Salisbury Plain.

The team initially identified the stone source in north-eastern Scotland by analyzing its mineral composition and age.

They then modeled the behavior of ancient glaciers and found evidence suggesting that the ice may have carried the stones southeast to Dogger Bank, currently submerged in the North Sea.

From these findings, the research team proposed that prehistoric peoples may have retrieved the stone from Dogger Bank, transported it to Salisbury Plain, and ultimately integrated it into the construction of Stonehenge.

“This discovery highlights an impressive level of organization and collaboration among Neolithic communities,” Dr. Clarke remarked.

“Transporting large stones over extensive distances would have required intricate planning, coordination, and a profound understanding of the landscape, along with significant determination.”

“Our study demonstrates the effectiveness of combining geological analysis and computer modeling to address enduring questions about the construction of Stonehenge.”

“Future research intends to pinpoint the exact origin of the Altar Stone in north-eastern Scotland and further explore potential transport routes utilized by prehistoric peoples.”

The results will be published in today’s Quaternary Science Journal.

_____

Anthony JI Clarke et al. From the Highlands to the Henge: Elucidating the Source and Transport Routes of Stonehenge’s Altar Stones. Quaternary Science Journal, published online June 4, 2026. doi: 10.1002/jqs.70080

Source: www.sci.news

Unveiling the Mystery: Stonehenge’s Altar Stones Likely Not Transported by Glaciers

Stonehenge Altar Stone

The 5-meter-long altar stone is mostly buried at the center of Stonehenge.

Laurence Berger/Getty Images

Recent research into Stonehenge’s enigmatic altar stone suggests it may have originated from northeast Scotland, possibly carried south by glaciers. However, scientists argue that it’s more plausible humans transported this six-tonne stone.

This striking 5-meter-long monolith has been situated at the heart of Stonehenge’s worked rock ring for around 4,500 years, partially buried beneath two other stones.

In a 2024 study, researcher Anthony Clark and his team from Curtin University in Perth determined that the altar stone’s origins lie in northeastern Scotland, based on detailed rock chemistry analysis.

Clark notes, “The altar stone is sandstone—like crushed grains of sand on a beach. We can fingerprint the age and chemical makeup of these particles and compare them to other rocks across the UK and Ireland.”

The chemical profiles revealed a match with rocks from the Orcadian Basin, confirming the altar stone must have traveled approximately 750 kilometers to reach Stonehenge in southern England.

Initially, Clark and his colleagues theorized that the altar stones were likely transported by boat. They also explored the possibility that glaciers may have facilitated this movement during the last ice age, reducing the distance for human transport.

Utilizing geological analysis and ancient ice flow modeling, they reconstructed glacier movements. Their findings indicated that while most ice flow from northeast Scotland headed north, some could have directed south, potentially delivering rocks to Dogger Bank. This land bridge connected Britain to mainland Europe until it was submerged beneath the North Sea about 8,000 years ago, long before Stonehenge’s construction began around 5,000 years ago.

If glaciers had indeed transported these altar stones to Dogger Bank, it could have significantly shortened the journey for humans.

However, the flooding of Dogger Bank makes this hypothesis increasingly complex. Given that other stones at Stonehenge weigh between 25 and 30 tons and were undoubtedly moved by humans over substantial distances, it’s likely they possessed the necessary skills and determination to relocate the altar stone as well.

Clark emphasizes, “The builders of Stonehenge were not rushed. Similar to the pyramids, this took years to accomplish; it didn’t need to be done within modern timescales.”

Ultimately, further sampling may help pinpoint the exact quarry from where the altar stone originated. However, the reasons behind this monumental endeavor may forever remain a mystery. “Why would we select certain stones for monuments?” Clark poses, drawing parallels to choosing premium materials for modern kitchens or treasured pieces of jewelry. “Humans have always been drawn to specific stones, and for some reason, these ancient Britons required sandstone from northeastern Scotland.”

Topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Ancient Peoples Transported Wallabies to the Indonesian Islands by Canoe

Thousands of years ago

Mehd Halaouate, birdingindonesia.com

Dating back either 12 or 800 years ago, wild wallabies were caught and transported by canoe to nearby islands located dozens of kilometers away.

The Sahuru natives—a group of marsupials from a prehistoric landmass that eventually broke into Australia and New Guinea—likely accompanied human explorers and traders to the islands in Southeast Asia, providing food, decorative fur, and tools made from bones. This animal import is recognized as one of the earliest known instances of animal translocation, with established colonies thriving over millennia, according to Dylan Gaffney at Oxford University.

“This aligns with a broader understanding of how early humans managed, transported, and raised animals more deliberately than previously assumed. They didn’t merely endure in these tropical environments; they actively transformed them,” says Gaffney.

Research pertaining to species translocation typically prioritizes European explorers, who notably introduced invasive rabbits to Australia in the 18th and 19th centuries and reintroduced horses to the Americas in the late 1400s and early 1500s.

However, in the 1990s, two types of marsupial bones were identified—Phalanger Orientalis Breviceps or Phalanger Breviceps, along with Bandicoot bones (Echymipera Kalubu)—from the Eastern Islands of New Guinea, and Brown Forest Wallabies (Dorcopsis Muelleri) found on an island west of Halmahera, roughly 350 km from Sahuru’s ancient shores.

Based on the age of nearby charcoal remains and the sediment layers, research teams estimate that the Wallabies arrived around 8,000 years ago, while other species date back to between 13,000 and 24,000 years ago.

The specifics of how these animals arrived on the islands remain unclear—whether by human transport or natural means. To explore this, Gaffney and his colleagues examined a new archaeological site in Indonesia’s Rajaanpat Islands.

There, thousands-of-years-old skeletons indicate that the colony of brown forest wallabies thrived on the island about 4,000 years ago, though the reasons behind this are still uncertain.

Radiocarbon dating in a cave inland revealed evidence of wallabies being hunted and cooked as far back as 13,000 years ago, further supported by findings from another island to the west that dates back 5,000 years.

The team also uncovered several bone tools utilized in hunting and textile work, suggesting human activity at least 8,500 years ago.

In investigating how these animals arrived on distant islands, the team employed computer modeling that accounted for the sea levels and environmental conditions of that era.

This modeling supports the theory that humans transported the animals via canoes, Gaffney explains. Without human assistance, Wallabies would have struggled to survive the treacherous oceanic journey that could have lasted over 24 hours, relying on vegetation rafts for days to reach the islands. While swimming to nearby islands is conceivable, it’s uncertain whether forest wallabies (modern or ancient) possessed the ability to swim.

In contrast, canoe trips would have taken only a few hours to a couple of days, a timeframe that likely would have been manageable for breeding animals.

These findings underscore a sophisticated understanding of species movement by humans well before the era of European colonial expansion. Tom Matthews, who was not involved in the research and is from the University of Birmingham, UK, states, “We frequently assume that these introductions began within the last 500 years, but the evidence indicates that humans were reshaping their ecosystems long before then.”

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com