Doctors Report Immigrants Avoiding Medical Care Due to Fear of ICE

A man lay on the sidewalk in New York City, injured by a gunshot, holding his side.

Emily Bolgaard, a social worker providing supplies to the homeless through her nonprofit, discovered him and prepared to call 911. Nonetheless, the man pleaded with her not to make the call.

“No, no, no,” he insisted.

Bolgaard attempted to reassure him that federal law mandated hospitals to treat patients regardless of immigration status, but his fear was palpable.

“He expressed, ‘If I go to the emergency department, I’ll be on their radar,'” she recounted in an interview about the event.

Across the nation, healthcare professionals are increasingly worried that individuals with severe medical issues, including injuries and chronic illnesses, are forgoing treatment due to fears of arrest by immigration officials. After the Trump administration’s announcement of extensive deportation plans, the Biden administration’s strategy of safeguarding areas like hospitals and clinics has led to a noticeable increase in patient anxiety and a decrease in treatment uptake.

If this trend persists, healthcare professionals indicate that the consequences could be severe. Uncontrolled infectious diseases could spread, healthcare costs would rise due to untreated chronic conditions, and complications during childbirth may pose increased risks to women delaying care.

In a KFF survey, 31% of immigrants reported concerns that their status (or that of family members) could adversely affect their health. About 20% of all surveyed migrants shared struggles with diet and sleep, while 31% experienced increased stress and anxiety.

A White House representative did not respond to a request for comment. Following the announcement on January 21 to end protections at hospitals, a statement from the Department of Homeland Security indicated that the updated policy was “designed to enforce immigration laws and apprehend criminal foreigners.”

Research indicates that immigration enforcement actions are associated with deterioration in birth outcomes, negative mental health effects, decreased care access, and reduced public program utilization that alleviates illness and poverty.

“We are not only creating significant health risks, but also long-term economic risks for our nation,” stated Julie Linton, a pediatrician and member of the American Academy of Pediatrics’ Federal Committee. “These policies instill very real fear and uncertainty among people, drastically impacting their daily functioning.”

Numerous immigrant communities grapple with a high prevalence of chronic diseases, including hypertension and diabetes. Without treatment, this can lead to serious complications like heart attacks and strokes.

Doctors express concern for patients like Maria, a 47-year-old pre-diabetic woman who has visited the same primary care clinic since arriving in the U.S. from El Salvador two decades ago. Even during the first Trump administration’s crackdown on immigrants, she sought medical care consistently. However, after protections around hospitals were lifted earlier this year, Maria canceled her appointment to check her blood sugar.

“We are in the clinic and deeply afraid of ICE arriving while we wait,” she said in Spanish.

Maria, who requested to remain anonymous, described herself as being in “continuous anguish.” She is formulating a plan to care for her American citizen child in the event she and her husband are deported.

One of her daughters, aged 15, is being treated for fatty liver disease, while another child requires care for developmental issues. Their eldest daughter has a doctor’s appointment scheduled for June. Maria and her husband wish to continue their child’s treatment but are apprehensive about attending appointments alone. “It’s very complicated,” Maria said. “I can risk myself for my child, but when it comes to my own health, I prefer to let it go.”

The repercussions of forgoing regular medical care can escalate quickly. Jim Manzia, president of St. John’s Community Health Network in Los Angeles, described a diabetic patient who ceased attending weekly diabetes education classes. Upon contacting her, the clinic staff discovered she was too terrified to even go grocery shopping and had subsisted on tortillas and coffee for days.

“We’re thankful we managed to reach her and that she came in,” Manzia noted. The network serves approximately 25,000 undocumented patients across more than 20 locations. Clinic exams indicated her blood sugar levels were dangerously elevated.

“This is becoming increasingly common,” Manzia lamented. “It breaks my heart to discuss these situations.”

In emergency care settings, doctors have noted several unusual indicators reflecting the impact of immigration enforcement. For instance, Dr. Amy Zidan, an emergency physician in Atlanta, reported a more than 60% decline in requests for Spanish interpretation in her hospital’s emergency department from January to February.

Theresa Cheng, an ER physician at Zuckerberg San Francisco General Hospital, recounted an incident where one of her residents cared for an immigrant patient who had sustained multiple facial fractures from an assault but hadn’t sought care for over two weeks. “There is an overwhelming sense of fear,” Dr. Cheng stated.

In late January, Dr. Cheng treated a patient with severely untreated diabetes. The undocumented woman shared her terror and had been waiting for assistance. Tragically, she passed away that same day.

Dr. Carolina Miranda, a family physician in the Bronx, discussed a patient granted legal asylum, yet fearing ICE, who missed an appointment regarding a potential brain tumor.

Similar delays and cancellations have been observed among pregnant women and new mothers nationwide. Dr. Caitlyn Bernard, an obstetrician in Indiana, noted a patient who skipped a postnatal visit, indicating she no longer felt safe leaving her house. Staff on the obstetrics floor of a San Diego hospital reported a significant drop in immigrant women experiencing acute pregnancy-related issues following the administration change.

“These women undeniably still exist,” a doctor, choosing to remain anonymous due to institutional restrictions on public statements, expressed. “I fear this will drive up maternal mortality rates over time.”

Many children of immigrant parents who skip appointments or leave prescriptions unfilled are American citizens. In mixed-status families, parents facing deportation often hesitate to bring their children to clinics or pharmacies.

Pediatricians serving underserved populations in Central Coast California reported a 30% increase in missed child appointments. Many families who sought professional care for their children, including evaluations for speech therapy and autism, cited fear as a barrier, with some wishing to remain anonymous due to the sensitive nature of their situations.

Dr. Tania Caballero, a pediatrician at Johns Hopkins, has encountered parents reluctant to visit emergency rooms, including those with children suffering from chronic conditions such as cerebral palsy, asthma, and diabetes.

“I tell my patients, ‘I cannot control what happens outside of my clinic. I can’t ensure against an ICE visit, but you know me, and I possess the resources to help you navigate this journey together,'” she explained.

Some parents facing dire circumstances, like those of children undergoing cancer treatment, believed their child’s medical conditions might shield them. They sought letters from pediatricians outlining their child’s medical needs, hoping this information would convince immigration authorities to allow them to remain in the U.S. for survival.

Dr. Lisa Gwyn, a pediatrician in South Florida, reported alarming drops in patient attendance as families from the Caribbean and South America miss essential pediatric vaccinations needed to prevent illnesses like measles, pneumonia, and whooping cough.

Dr. Gwyn also expressed concern for children who have endured significant trauma before arriving in the U.S. and who are not connected with social workers or psychologists for needed support.

“Imagine a child living in a home filled with fear. They came to this country hoping to find safety, only to feel afraid again,” she said. “We understand that prolonged stress negatively impacts health. Children who are stressed perform poorly in school and often battle mental health issues, including anxiety and depression.”

Some medical facilities have stated they will comply with immigration authorities. NYU Langone has issued warnings to employees cautioning against attempting to shield undocumented patients. However, many other health centers and organizations are finding ways to protect their patients by displaying “Know Your Rights” information and advising staff not to log immigration status in patients’ medical records.

Last week, the New England Journal of Medicine published an article detailing how physicians continue to provide healthcare while legally distancing themselves from ICE requests.

The St. John’s Clinic Network in Los Angeles recently instituted an ambitious home visit initiative where doctors, nurses, and medical assistants conduct examinations and deliver medication, working to inform all undocumented patients of this service.

The New York Regional Hospital Association proposed designating a “hospital contact” to quickly guide law enforcement to private offices, emphasizing the necessity of viewing signed warrants.

In the emergency department at University Hospital, a safety-net facility in Newark, staff distribute cards in Spanish and other languages to remind patients of their rights, stating, “You have the right to refuse consent to searches of yourself, your car, or your home.”

Yet, fear remains palpable. Dr. Annaly M. Baker, an emergency physician, recounted witnessing a young woman who had been beaten unconscious waiting for hours to receive care.

Dr. Baker also attended to a minor who had been stabbed but required parental consent for treatment. The boy was reluctant to provide details, fearing that his parents might be caught in immigration enforcement.

What troubles Dr. Baker most is the number of people who never seek treatment at all.

“The tragic message to these individuals is to remain hidden, and I hope you don’t die,” she remarked.

Sarah Cliff contributed to this report.

Source: www.nytimes.com

Avoiding Taxes in Ancient Rome: Secrets Revealed in 1,900-Year-Old Papyrus Scrolls

In what wasn’t exactly the tax evasion trial of the century – given that it took place in the second century – the charges faced by the defendants were so weighty that they included forgery, financial fraud, and fraudulent slave sales. While tax evasion is an age-old practice, these particular crimes were deemed extremely serious under Roman law, with penalties ranging from hefty fines and lifelong exile to grueling labor and, in the most severe cases, being devoured by wild animals in a practice known as damnatio ad bestias.

The details of the allegations were recorded on papyrus, which was discovered decades ago in the Judean Desert and recently subjected to analysis. The documentation includes preliminary notes for the prosecutor and hastily drafted minutes from the judicial hearings. According to the ancient records, the tax evasion schemes involved document tampering, illicit slave sales, and manumission.

The accused in both tax cases were men. One of them, Gadalius, was the son of a poor notary who had ties to the local administrative elite. In addition to convictions for extortion and forgery, his extensive list of transgressions included banditry, incitement, and four appearances in court for tax evasion before the Roman governor. Gadalius’s partner in crime was a certain Saurus, identified as his “friends and collaborators,” and the mastermind Caper. While the ethnicity of the accused is not explicitly mentioned, their Jewish background is inferred from their biblical names Gedaliah and Saul.

This ancient legal saga unfolded during the reign of Hadrian, around the year 130 AD or possibly before 132 AD when Simon Bar Kochiba, the leader of the Messianic rebels, launched a large-scale uprising, marking the third and final conflict between the Jewish people and the Empire. The rebellion was brutally suppressed, resulting in hundreds of thousands of casualties, mass expulsions of Jewish communities, and the renaming of Syria and Palestine by Hadrian.

Anna Dolganov, a historian of the Roman Empire at the Austrian Archaeological Institute who deciphered the scroll, remarked, “The papyrus sheds light on the Roman authorities’ suspicion of their Jewish subjects.” She pointed out that there is archaeological evidence of a coordinated effort during the Bar Kochiba rebellion. “It is plausible that individuals like Gadalia and Saurus, who sought to subvert Roman rule through tax evasion, were involved in the uprising’s planning,” Dr. Dolganov suggested.

In the latest edition of Tyche, an ancient journal published by the University of Vienna, Dr. Dolganov and three colleagues from Austria and Israel present court proceedings as case studies. Their research unveils how Roman institutions and imperial law influenced the administration of justice in an environment with relatively few Roman citizens.

“This document provides intriguing and valuable insights into the slave trade in this region of the empire,” noted Dennis P. Kehoe, a classicist at Tulane University not involved in the study. “The allegations may involve the Jews owning slaves.”

The exact date and location of the papyrus’s discovery remain uncertain, but Dr. Dolganov suggested it was found by an ancient Bedouin dealer in the 1950s. She suspected Nahal Haver, a steep canyon west of the Dead Sea where Bar Kochiba rebels sought refuge in a cave hid along the natural fault line of a limestone cliff. In 1960, archaeologists unearthed documents from the era in one of the Jewish hideouts, with more discoveries made since then.

A 133-line irregular scroll, initially misclassified, went unnoticed in the Israeli Antiquities Authority archives until 2014 when Hannah Cotton Parietl, a classicist at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, identified it as being written in ancient Greek. Given the complexity and exceptional length of the document, a team of scholars was assembled to conduct detailed physical examinations and cross-referencing with historical sources.

Deciphering the papyrus and piecing together its intricate narrative posed a significant challenge for Dr. Dolganov. “The text features small, densely packed letters and highly rhetorical Greek replete with technical legal terminology,” she remarked. Unlike more straightforward documents such as contracts, there were no standardized templates for translation ease. “The fact that we only have the latter half of the original text further complicates matters,” Dr. Dolganov added.

Researchers speculated that the tax evasion scheme aimed to circumvent official scrutiny. This necessitated meticulous detective work to decipher the sequence of events. “I had to adopt the Roman fiscal authorities’ perspective to grasp the text’s nuances,” Dr. Dolganov explained. She also had to step into the accused’s shoes to understand the rationale behind tax fraud in the remote fringes of the Roman world.

The ancient stratagems resonate with contemporary tax experts. A German legal expert relayed to Dr. Dolganov that the subterfuges of Gadalius and Saurus mirrored present-day practices of tax evasion, such as asset shifting and fictitious transactions. The Roman interrogation methods aligned closely with modern-day investigative custody for financial crimes, marked by intimidation and frequently rigorous questioning.

A Princeton University classicist unaffiliated with the project, Brent Shaw, remarked:

The cases against Gadalius and Saurus were bolstered by intelligence provided by informants who betrayed them to the Roman authorities. Interestingly, the text implies that the informer might have been none other than Saurus himself, who implicated his partners to shield himself from an imminent financial scrutiny. The most plausible scenario posits that Saurus, a Jewish resident, orchestrated the pseudo-sale of several slaves to Chareas, a neighbor residing in the adjacent Arabian province, as per Dr. Dolganov’s interpretation.

By selling slaves across provincial borders, Saurus sought to obfuscate assets from scrutiny. While physically present in Saurus’s custody, the slaves, undocumented in Arabia, evaded declaration by Chareas. “Effectively, the slaves vanished on paper from Judea and never materialized in Arabia, eluding Roman oversight,” Dr. Dolganov noted. “This ensured that no further taxes were levied on these slaves.”

The Empire implemented a sophisticated system for monitoring slave ownership and collecting various levies, including a 4% tax on slave sales and a 5% duty on estates. “To emancipate empire-owned slaves, detailed documentary evidence of current and prior ownership was mandatory,” Dr. Dolganov elucidated. “Any missing or dubious documents would trigger an inquiry by Roman administrators.”

In an attempt to conceal Saurus’s double-dealings, Gadalius, the son of a notary, allegedly fabricated bills of sale and other legal documents. When authorities detected irregularities, the defendant purportedly bribed the local municipal council for protection. During the trial, Gadalius shifted blame onto his deceased father for the forgeries, while Saurus implicated Chaireas in the document tampering. The papyrus does not provide insights into their motives. “The rationale behind men risking forgery to liberate slaves without legitimate documentation remains a mystery,” Dr. Dolganov mused.

One conjecture posits that by orchestrating fake slave sales followed by manumission, Gadalis and Saurus may have been adhering to a Jewish religious mandate to free those enslaved. Alternatively, there might have been a profit incentive in capturing individuals across borders, potentially entrenching them as free Romans after freeing them from “enslavement.” Or Gadalia and Saurus might have engaged in human trafficking, a possibility that is as speculative as it is fraught with implications, Dr. Dolganov emphasized.

One aspect of the trial that struck Dr. Dolganov was the prosecutor’s professionalism. Employing sophisticated rhetorical strategies reminiscent of Cicero and Quintilian, the prosecutor exhibited a mastery of Roman legal terminology and concepts in Greek. “Here, on the edge of the Roman Empire, we witness a highly skilled legal practitioner steeped in Roman law,” Dr. Dolganov remarked.

The papyrus does not reveal the final verdict. “If a Roman judge deemed these men as incorrigible criminals deserving execution, Gadalius, as a member of the local elite, might have met a more merciful end through decapitation,” Dr. Dolganov suggested. “In any case, it beats being torn apart by a leopard.”

Source: www.nytimes.com

Research for avoiding digital communication addiction

Whether we communicate, whether we are worried about how we choose the right words to scribbles on Valentine’s Day cards or suffering from the way we ask our bosses awkward questions, there is very little trouble in our lives. And that’s before you become the incredible realm of digital communication and the new danger of “hybrid meetings”, the danger of trembling.

Andrew Brozky I know these challenges better than most. Based at the University of Texas at Austin, he is a workplace technology and communications expert. His own situation means that face-to-face interactions are not always possible in his teens, which led him to study virtual interactions. His insights have become invaluable when the Covid-19 pandemic came and we were all forced to be on platforms like Zoom and the team.

Brodsky is currently studying virtual communications of over 100,000 people, and his findings have led to a book. Ping: The secret to success in virtual communication. Drawing on his research and insights from others in the field, Brodsky unlocks secrets that will help us succeed in our personal lives and careers, giving some pointers with obvious pitfalls. Was that meeting via email? How close do you need to be to someone before sending a voice note? Brodsky has the answer.

Chris Stokel-Walker: Communication digitally is something we all have to do, but what led us to look at this very closely?

Andrew Brodsky: One of the things that really shocked me in my life is that I have cancer…

Source: www.newscientist.com

Why Are People Avoiding Elon Musk’s “Digital Town Square” and Heading for the Blue Sky?

a
Elon Musk’s departure from X resulted in the loss of around 2.7 million active Apple and Android users in the U.S. in a span of two months. In comparison, Bluesky, a competing social media platform, also saw a decline, losing nearly 2.5 million users during the same time frame.

This leak coincided with the exit of several prominent figures, including directors Guillermo del Toro and Mike Flanagan, and actors Quinta Brunson and Mark Hamill. Some, like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, still have an X account but are now using Bluesky more frequently.

According to digital market intelligence firm Similarweb, the number of daily active users on X in the U.S. has dropped by 8.4% since early October, from 32.3 million to 29.6 million.

On the other hand, Bluesky has experienced a significant increase of 1,064% since October 6, growing from 254,500 to approximately 2.7 million users. This surge began when Musk started using the @america X handle to promote his pro-Donald Trump super pack and began posting in support of the former president.

Following Trump’s election victory, this trend accelerated further. Within a week of November 5th, Bluesky’s total user count doubled from 743,900 to 1.4 million. A week later, the number doubled again to 2.8 million. Since Musk’s super pack formation on X, the platform’s U.S. active users have increased significantly compared to Bluesky.

Bruce Daisley, a former vice president at Twitter, attributed the shift away from X to Musk’s concept of a “digital town square” and the platform’s evolving nature. He expressed concerns about the rise of extreme views on X under Musk’s leadership.

French journalist Salome Sake, who had a significant following on X, deactivated her account due to harassment and misinformation on the platform. She found Bluesky to be a healthier space and shifted her focus there.

Despite finding a new platform for journalism, Salome believes that the exodus of users from X enables those who spread hate, propaganda, and misinformation online. She emphasized the importance of diverse opinions and critical thinking.

Notable exits from X also include a German football club, St. Pauli, and Werder Bremen, citing the platform’s radicalization and departure from their values. Werder Bremen chose to leave X due to its stance against hate speech and discrimination.

Christoph Pieper, the director of communications at Werder Bremen, highlighted the club’s moral values and commitment to fighting against discrimination. Despite the potential economic impact, the club prioritized its principles over online visibility on X.

Pieper expressed uncertainty about the club’s future on Bluesky but firmly stated that any platform allowing hate speech is not suitable for Werder Bremen. Many other clubs are also considering a transition to Bluesky, signaling a shift away from X.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Tips on Identifying and Avoiding Deception by AI-Generated Misinformation

Many of the AI-generated images look realistic upon closer inspection.

On the road

Did you notice that the image above was created by artificial intelligence? It can be difficult to spot AI-generated images, videos, audio, and text as technological advances make them indistinguishable from human-created content and more susceptible to manipulation by disinformation. However, knowing the current state of AI technology being used to create disinformation and the various signs that indicate what you're seeing may be fake can help you avoid being fooled.

World leaders are concerned. World Economic Forum ReportMisinformation and disinformation “have the potential to fundamentally disrupt electoral processes in multiple economies over the next two years,” while easier access to AI tools “has already led to an explosion in counterfeit information and so-called 'synthetic' content, from sophisticated voice clones to fake websites.”

While the terms misinformation and disinformation both refer to false or inaccurate information, disinformation is information that is deliberately intended to deceive or mislead.

“The problem with AI-driven disinformation is the scale, speed and ease with which it can be deployed,” he said. Hany Farid “These attacks no longer require nation-state actors or well-funded organizations — any individual with modest computing power can generate large amounts of fake content,” the University of California, Berkeley researchers said.

He is a pioneer of generative AI (See glossary below“AI is polluting our entire information ecosystem, calling into question everything we read, see, and hear,” and his research shows that AI-generated images and sounds are often “almost indistinguishable from reality.”

However, Farid and his colleagues' research reveals that there are strategies people can follow to reduce the risk of falling for social media misinformation and AI-created disinformation.

How to spot fake AI images

Remember when we saw the photo of Pope Francis wearing a down jacket? Fake AI images like this are becoming more common as new tools based on viral models (See glossary below), now anyone can create images from simple text prompts. study Google's Nicolas Dufour and his colleagues found that since the beginning of 2023, the share of AI-generated images in fact-checked misinformation claims has risen sharply.

“Today, media literacy requires AI literacy.” Negar Kamali at Northwestern University in Illinois in 2024 studyShe and her colleagues identified five different categories of errors in AI-generated images (outlined below) and offered guidance on how people can spot them on their own. The good news is that their research shows that people are currently about 70% accurate at detecting fake AI images. Online Image Test To evaluate your detective skills.

5 common types of errors in AI-generated images:

  1. Socio-cultural impossibilities: Does the scene depict behavior that is unusual, unusual, or surprising for a particular culture or historical figure?
  2. Anatomical irregularities: Look closely. Do the hands or other body parts look unusual in shape or size? Do the eyes or mouth look strange? Are any body parts fused together?
  3. Stylistic artifacts: Do the images look unnatural, too perfect, or too stylized? Does the background look odd or missing something? Is the lighting strange or variable?
  4. Functionality Impossibility: Are there any objects that look odd, unreal or non-functional? For example, a button or belt buckle in an odd place?
  5. Violation of Physics: Do the shadows point in different directions? Does the mirror's reflection match the world depicted in the image?

Strange objects or behaviors can be clues that an image was created by AI.

On the road

How to spot deepfakes in videos

An AI technology called generative adversarial networks (See glossary belowSince 2014, deepfakes have enabled tech-savvy individuals to create video deepfakes, which involve digitally manipulating existing videos of people to swap out different faces, create new facial expressions, and insert new audio with matching lip syncing. This has enabled a growing number of fraudsters, state-sponsored hackers, and internet users to produce video deepfakes, potentially allowing celebrities such as Taylor Swift and everyday people alike to unwillingly appear in deepfake porn, scams, and political misinformation and disinformation.

The AI ​​techniques used to spot fake images (see above) can also be applied to suspicious videos. What's more, researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Northwestern University in Illinois have A few tips There has been a lot of research into how to spot these deepfakes, but it's acknowledged that there is no foolproof method that will always work.

6 tips to spot AI-generated videos:

  1. Mouth and lip movements: Are there moments when the video and audio are not perfectly in sync?
  2. Anatomical defects: Does your face or body look strange or move unnaturally?
  3. face: Look for inconsistencies in facial smoothness, wrinkles around the forehead and cheeks, and facial moles.
  4. Lights up: Is the lighting inconsistent? Do shadows behave the way you expect them to? Pay particular attention to the person's eyes, eyebrows, and glasses.
  5. hair: Does your facial hair look or move oddly?
  6. Blink: Blinking too much or too little can be a sign of a deepfake.

A new category of video deepfakes is based on the diffusion model (See glossary below), the same AI technology behind many image generators, can create entirely AI-generated video clips based on text prompts. Companies have already tested and released commercial versions of their AI video generators, potentially making them easy to create for anyone without requiring special technical knowledge. So far, the resulting videos tend to feature distorted faces and odd body movements.

“AI-generated videos are likely easier for humans to detect than images because they contain more motion and are much more likely to have AI-generated artifacts and impossibilities,” Kamali says.

How to spot an AI bot

Social media accounts controlled by computer bots have become commonplace across many social media and messaging platforms. Many of these bots also leverage generative AI techniques such as large-scale language models.See glossary below) will be launched in 2022, making it easier and cheaper to mass-produce grammatically correct, persuasive, customized, AI-written content through thousands of bots for a variety of situations.

“It's now much easier to customize these large language models for specific audiences with specific messages.” Paul Brenner At the University of Notre Dame in Indiana.

Brenner and his colleagues found that volunteers were only able to distinguish between AI-powered bots and humans when About 42 percent Even though participants were told they might interact with a bot, they would still be able to test their bot-detection skills. here.

Brenner said some strategies could help identify less sophisticated AI bots.

5 ways to tell if a social media account is an AI bot:

  1. Emojis and hashtags: Overusing these can be a sign.
  2. Unusual phrases, word choices, and analogies: Unusual language can indicate an AI bot.
  3. Repetition and Structure: Bots may repeat words that follow a similar or fixed format, or may overuse certain slang terms.
  4. Ask a question: These may reveal the bot's lack of knowledge on a topic, especially when it comes to local locations and situations.
  5. Assume the worst: If the social media account is not a personal contact and its identity has not been clearly verified or confirmed, it may be an AI bot.

How to detect audio duplication and audio deepfakes

Voice Clone (See glossary belowAI tools have made it easier to generate new voices that can imitate virtually anyone, which has led to a rise in audio deepfake scams replicating the voices of family members, business executives and political leaders such as US President Joe Biden. These are much harder to identify compared to AI-generated videos and images.

“Voice clones are particularly difficult to distinguish between real and fake because there are no visual cues to help the brain make that decision,” he said. Rachel TobackCo-founder of SocialProof Security, a white hat hacking organization.

Detecting these AI voice deepfakes can be difficult, especially when they're used in video or phone calls, but there are some common sense steps you can take to help distinguish between real human voices and AI-generated ones.

4 steps to use AI to recognize if audio has been duplicated or faked:

  1. Public figures: If the audio clip is of an elected official or public figure, review whether what they say is consistent with what has already been publicly reported or shared about that person's views or actions.
  2. Look for inconsistencies: Compare your audio clip to previously authenticated video or audio clips featuring the same person. Are there any inconsistencies in the tone or delivery of the voice?
  3. Awkward Silence: If you're listening to a phone call or voicemail and notice that the speaker takes unusually long pauses while speaking, this could be due to the use of AI-powered voice duplication technology.
  4. Weird and redundant: Robotic or unusually verbose speech may indicate that someone is using a combination of voice cloning to mimic a person's voice and large language models to generate accurate phrasing.

Out of character behaviour by public figures like Narendra Modi could be a sign of AI

Follow

Technology will continue to improve

As it stands, there are no consistent rules that can consistently distinguish AI-generated content from authentic human content. AI models that can generate text, images, videos, and audio will surely continue to improve, allowing them to quickly generate content that looks authentic without obvious artifacts or mistakes. “Recognize that, to put it mildly, AI is manipulating and fabricating images, videos, and audio, and it happens in under 30 seconds,” Tobac says. “This makes it easy for bad actors looking to mislead people to quickly subvert AI-generated disinformation, which can be found on social media within minutes of breaking news.”

While it's important to hone our ability to spot AI-generated disinformation and learn to ask more questions about what we read, see and hear, ultimately this alone won't be enough to stop the damage, and the responsibility for spotting it can't be placed solely on individuals. Farid is among a number of researchers who argue that government regulators should hold accountable the big tech companies that have developed many of the tools that are flooding the internet with fake, AI-generated content, as well as startups backed by prominent Silicon Valley investors. “Technology is not neutral,” Farid says. “The tech industry is selling itself as not having to take on the responsibilities that other industries take on, and I totally reject that.”

Diffusion Model: An AI model that learns by first adding random noise to data (such as blurring an image) and then reversing the process to recover the original data.

Generative Adversarial Networks: A machine learning technique based on two neural networks that compete by modifying the original data and attempting to predict whether the generated data is genuine or not.

Generative AI: A broad class of AI models that can generate text, images, audio, and video after being trained on similar forms of content.

Large-scale language models: A subset of generative AI models that can generate different forms of written content in response to text prompts, and in some cases translate between different languages.

Voice CloneA potential way to use AI models to create a digital copy of a person's voice and generate new voice samples with that voice.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

The Importance of Updating Outdated Software for U.S. Small Businesses: Avoiding Potential Losses

C
Poor and outdated technology is costing the United States enormous amounts of money.according to
recent columns The Wall Street Journal said it would cost more than $1.5 trillion to fix, with “cybersecurity and operational failures, failed development projects, and maintenance of outdated systems costing $2.41 trillion annually.” There is.


According to the magazine, this “technical debt” lurks beneath the shiny newness of “an accumulation of band-aids and outdated systems not intended for today's use,” all of which need updating. It is said to be extremely sensitive.

And I don't know that.

I've been dealing with this problem every day for the past 20 years. My life revolves around outdated systems, outdated software, and patched databases. My company sells customer relationship management (CRM) software primarily to small and medium-sized businesses. And look at the old technology they still have.

It's not uncommon to come across older versions of Microsoft Office. One of his companies I know is still running Office 97. I see companies using QuickBooks on desktop computers. Remember ACT and GoldMine for contact managers? Yes, they're still there. Great Plains? MAS90? Yes, there are still remnants of these ancient accounting systems in today's products manufactured by Microsoft and Sage.

It's not uncommon to encounter companies with internal networks running legacy client/server applications on Windows machines.Approximately 81% of companies
still writing paper checks to suppliers. My company's biggest competitor is not any other CRM software. Someone is walking away from a prehistoric, proprietary system built on top of his FileMaker Pro, which hasn't been updated since the system's creator passed away ten years ago.

Over the years, I have never faulted small business owners for not upgrading.

These people spent a lot of money implementing software systems back in the day. They'd have to come up with a pretty good reason to scrap it all and start fresh. Cloud? Better security? More integration? Maybe. But then again, wouldn't that money be better spent buying new equipment, repairing the warehouse roof, or medical care? And don't we hear about the mistakes made by ~? ?
microsoft and
Google And A.I.
“hallucination” And that
data breach Are the world's smartest people at the biggest technology companies that are supposed to work for them? Can we trust these companies and their shiny new applications? Why invite trouble?

Replacing or upgrading technology is one of the many decisions businesspeople have to make every year. They know the chaos it causes. And many of my clients shrug their shoulders and say it's not broken so why fix it?

Skip past newsletter promotions

Understood. But now my feelings are starting to change. No, I'm not siding with big tech companies. It's about inheritance.

More than half of small business owners in this country are over 50 years old, and the baby boomers currently running companies will likely aim to take the next step in the not-too-distant future. They expect to make the most money from the business they have built over the past few decades. But the same people who saved money on technology upgrades to invest elsewhere will be shocked. why?

Because this is a world of big data and unless the technology is up to date, the price of your business will be greatly affected. This is not a technical issue. It's a matter of evaluation. Buyers will quickly discount the purchase price to cover the cost of having to upgrade or replace these older systems.

My advice to business owners looking to leave their companies within the next 10 years is that it's time to upgrade. Otherwise, “technical debt” will cost you dearly.

Source: www.theguardian.com