Chimpanzee Population Conflicts Reveal Evolutionary Origins of War

Conflict between Ngogo chimpanzees

Violent Conflict Among Ngogo Chimpanzees

Aaron Sandel

Once a cohesive group, the Ngogo chimpanzees have divided, leading to escalation in violence and conflict. Researchers suggest this division might indicate that warfare is an innate aspect of our nature, rather than a recent development linked to our evolving culture.

According to Aaron Sandel and his team from the University of Texas at Austin, a comprehensive analysis of 24 years of social networks, 10 years of GPS tracking, and 30 years of demographic data on the chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in Kibale National Park, Uganda, was conducted.

Sandel emphasizes caution with terminology: “These are chimpanzees. Terms like war and civil war carry specific meanings for humans. While the conflict is not a civil war, there exist notable parallels, particularly regarding the shifts in group identity that precipitate lethal conflict.”

Chimpanzees are notorious for violence, predominantly targeting infants of rivals or outsider males.

The Ngogo population, comprising 150 to 200 individuals, is closely related to bonobos (Pongo niger), recognized as humans’ nearest relatives.

Between 1995 and 2015, the Ngogo chimpanzees were known for their cooperative behavior, showcasing fission-fusion dynamics, where individuals form temporary associations throughout the day and regroup each evening.

During puberty, female chimpanzees typically leave the group, while males remain for life. Prior to 2015, adult males formed alliances with females, facilitating hunting and territory patrols.

However, on June 24, 2015, a pivotal confrontation occurred when one faction, known as the central group, violently expelled the western group from their shared territory.

Following this event, the unity among the chimpanzees deteriorated. By 2018, the groups had permanently separated. During the ensuing years, the western group undertook 24 attacks, resulting in the deaths of seven adults and 17 infants from the other faction.

Chimpanzees from the Western Group on Patrol

Aaron Sandel

Sandel noted that the central chimpanzees were the first to pursue the western group; yet, the initial aggressors remain unclear. “As new factions emerged and divisions solidified, both groups engaged in territorial disputes,” he explained. “However, the western group has become the dominant aggressor, responsible for all fatal attacks.”

Various factors are believed to have contributed to the conflict’s escalation. Initial disagreements over food resources may have sparked tensions. In 2014, the deaths of five males and one female likely weakened the social structure. Changes in alpha male dynamics further exacerbated the situation, culminating in an outbreak of respiratory disease.

This outbreak, which claimed 25 Ngogo chimpanzees in January 2017, including the last surviving males of both factions, extinguished hopes for reconciliation.

Sandel and his team propose that the patterns observed in chimpanzee conflicts could provide insights into the evolutionary foundations of human warfare. While contemporary human conflicts are often attributed to ethnic, religious, and political divisions, this perspective may overlook the fundamental social dynamics shared with our primate relatives.

“In specific scenarios, the path toward peace may stem from simple, everyday acts of reconciliation,” the researchers articulated in their findings.

Maud Muzino from Boston University emphasizes that there are two predominant theories regarding the origins of human conflict. The first posits that war is a recent cultural innovation stemming from agrarian society and the establishment of nation-states. The alternative viewpoint asserts that the roots of warfare trace back through human evolution. “Ngogo’s findings significantly contribute to understanding the deep-seated origins of human conflict,” Muzino notes.

This study reveals that social fragmentation and subsequent conflicts can arise independently of the cultural differences often presumed to trigger human wars, be it in beliefs, language, or religious practices, states Luke Glowacki, also from Boston University.

Topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

New Research Uncovers Internal Conflicts Among Violent Chimpanzee Groups

For many years in Uganda’s Kibale National Park, two groups of chimpanzees coexisted, engaging in grooming, socializing, and territory patrols within their communities.

Subscribe to read this story without ads

Get unlimited access to ad-free articles and exclusive content.


Then, in a shocking turn of events, one group violently attacked the other, igniting years of conflict likened to human civil wars.

When the violence erupted in 2015, John Mitani, a professor emeritus of anthropology at the University of Michigan with over 20 years of research on chimpanzees, described the chaos: “It was just chaos. They started screaming and chasing each other.”

In the three years following the outbreak, Mitani and his colleague Aaron Sandel, an associate professor of anthropology at the University of Texas, documented how the chimpanzees’ social networks began to erode. By 2018, the two factions known as Western Ngogo and Central Ngogo chimpanzees “stopped sharing territory and began engaging in aggressive behavior, even killing each other,” Mitani reported.

At least 28 chimpanzees, including 19 infants, have been killed in this period, according to the initial research published in Science.

Mitani remarked, “Individuals who once aided each other now view one another as enemies.”

Basie, a central chimpanzee, is attacked by two males from the western subpopulation.
Aaron Sandel

This marks the second observed instance of chimpanzee factions splitting and turning violent. Given that chimpanzees and bonobos are humans’ closest genetic relatives, the findings may offer insights into human behavior.

“Civil wars afflict people. How can you turn a neighbor against you? This study of chimpanzees highlights how group identity evolves and how lethal aggression arises,” Sandel noted.

Infants were torn from their mothers and killed.

Following the social collapse, one-sided violence escalated. The Western chimpanzees, initially a minority group, were responsible for all subsequent attacks post-split in 2018. While their numbers rose from 76 to 108, the Central chimpanzee population has steadily decreased.

Attacks have been brutal, with a Western chimpanzee reportedly tearing an infant from its mother’s arms and killing it.

Sandel highlighted that chimpanzees often utilize gang violence when targeting adult or adolescent males.

“Five or ten chimpanzees will overwhelm an individual, holding them down, biting, beating, and dragging them,” he explained. “The violence can be horrifying.”

Mitani remarked, “It’s distressing to witness.”

“The situation deeply troubles me,” he expressed.

Researchers seek answers regarding the reasons behind the collapse of social structures.

Since 1995, chimpanzees at Ngogo have been closely monitored, with structured documentation of their behavior. The recent study utilized 10 years of GPS tracking, 30 years of demographic data, and 24 years of detailed observations.

The team examined chimpanzee social networks by observing individual males for an hour, recording proximity, interactions, and grooming behaviors. They noted recurring patterns of overlapping social dynamics that ultimately led to a breakdown.

Mitani and Sandel propose that the group’s large size might have played a role in the violent divide. While typical chimpanzee groups consist of around 50 individuals, the Ngogo community boasted about 200, possibly straining social connections and heightening competition for resources.

Additionally, the death of five adult males from disease prior to the split could have disrupted critical social ties. Following this, a new alpha male emerged in 2015, further complicating social dynamics.

“That’s a significant factor,” Mitani explained, noting that such shifts typically occur every 6-8 years, often increasing aggression and altering relationships.

Decades ago, Jane Goodall witnessed similar violence

Approximately 50 years ago, the late Jane Goodall and her team observed a series of assaults that led to group fragmentation in Tanzania’s Gombe National Park. The main group hunted down and killed all males from the splinter group.

Researchers subsequently termed this conflict the “Four Years’ War.”

Anne Pusey, a professor emeritus of evolutionary anthropology at Duke University, studied these interactions until 1975, and noted that conditions preceding the killings were “remarkably similar” to those seen in Ngogo.

In Gombe, changes in alpha leadership, a shortage of mating females, and the deaths of amicable older males precipitated violent behavior.

Pusey remarked, “These social bonds deteriorated, leading to hostility.”

Joseph Feldblum, an evolutionary anthropologist with experience studying Gombe, stated that the recent findings align with historical observations.

“Such behavior is infrequent, yet exists within the natural repertoire of chimpanzees,” he noted.

Mitani expressed concern over the future of the Ngogo central group, suggesting they may be “doomed” based on past events at Gombe.

“The signs are evident,” he stated.

With the ongoing violence against infants and exclusion of females, Mitani concluded, “We might be witnessing an extinction event.”

Impact on humans

What can we learn from the violent behaviors displayed by our closest relatives?

Sandel emphasized that while cultural differences are often blamed for human warfare, this explanation does not apply to chimpanzees.

“Chimpanzees lack ethnicity, religions, and political ideologies, which are often identified as causes of human conflicts, especially internal strife like civil wars.”

Instead, researchers believe the violence is rooted in the breakdown of friendships and rivalry escalation. Sandel suggested that these dynamics may play a more pivotal role in human civil wars than commonly recognized, proposing that small gestures of reconciliation could be vital for peace.

Mitani reminded us that humans diverged from chimpanzees 6 to 8 million years ago. He cautioned against viewing violence against neighbors as an inherent human trait simply because it is observed in chimpanzees.

“We have evolved,” Mitani asserted. “As a species, we have become increasingly cooperative and socially inclined, often helping not only our neighbors but even strangers. This capability is not shared by chimpanzees.”

Source: www.nbcnews.com

How Middle East Conflicts Could Speed Up the Shift to Clean Energy

Sure! Here’s the rewritten content, optimized for SEO while retaining the HTML tags:

Smoke and fire erupt at oil facility in Fujairah, United Arab Emirates

Smoke and fire erupt at oil facility in Fujairah, United Arab Emirates

Associated Press/Alamy

Despite the consistent opposition to climate initiatives from Donald Trump, his policies inadvertently accelerated the Green Revolution by directing attention to Iran’s actions.

In retaliation, Iran has halted nearly all navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, a crucial passage where 20% of the world’s oil and gas supply flows, escalating tensions with attacks on oil and gas infrastructures using drones and missiles.

As a result, oil prices have surged from approximately $70 to over $100 per barrel, with natural gas prices also seeing significant increases in various regions. Arab nations are attempting to redirect fuel through pipelines, though high prices are anticipated to persist. A think tank, Ember, estimates that even a decrease to an average oil price of $85 would result in an additional financial burden of $240 billion on fossil fuel-importing countries.

However, these costs could be mitigated by up to 70% through the adoption of renewable energy, electric vehicles, and heat pumps.

“The conflict in Iran will likely hasten the transition to cleaner energy sources,” says Sam Butler-Sloss from Ember. “As prices escalate and the vulnerability of fossil fuel systems becomes evident, nations recognize the urgent need to harness renewable energy—particularly where abundant solar and wind resources are available.”

The fallout from this energy crisis will likely surpass the impact of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, which disrupted the flow of Russian oil and gas to Europe. Consequently, annual solar installations in the EU have more than doubled, with growth in the UK nearing two-thirds, and wind energy capacity continuing to expand. Currently, renewable energy constitutes about 45% of the global energy capacity.

Asia currently stands as the most vulnerable region. 4/5 The amount of oil and liquefied natural gas (LNG) transported through the Strait of Hormuz is critical for countries like Japan and South Korea, relying on it for 70% of their oil supply. Additionally, Taiwan sources a third of its natural gas from the strait, with India receiving up to 50% of its imports from there. Some businesses in India have even reduced menu options due to the cooking gas shortage. “This marks Asia’s moment of reckoning,” states Butler-Sloss.

As Japan and South Korea increase coal usage, which is twice as polluting as natural gas, short-term greenhouse gas emissions may rise. Simultaneously, both nations are boosting output from existing nuclear power plants.

In response, the South Korean government is expediting approvals, financing, and grid access for wind and solar projects. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi emphasized on March 11 that solar energy and electric vehicles are essential to decrease dependence on foreign fuel imports, as reported.

“Much like Europe did four years ago, Asian economies are beginning to awaken to these challenges,” says Pavel Molchanov from Raymond James & Associates. “This wake-up call will stimulate an increase in renewable energy adoption as fossil fuels become increasingly prone to disruption.”

China, which imports nearly half of its oil via the Strait of Hormuz, has already outpaced the global average in solar and wind power installations, with anticipations that this trend will amplify. However, as the world’s largest coal producer, it may simultaneously elevate coal usage in its energy mix.

“China will adhere to its comprehensive energy strategy,” notes Li Shuo from the Asian Social Policy Research Institute. “This lesson will resonate with several other nations.”

For countries with underdeveloped electricity grids, the rising costs of natural gas and diesel will position solar energy as a more attractive option for utilities, households, and businesses alike. Following the Ukraine invasion, Pakistan saw a notable increase in solar energy, which rose from 4% to 25% of its electricity generation, driven by households and businesses investing in affordable solar panels from China.

In the long run, electric vehicles (EVs) could emerge as significant beneficiaries. Prices for EVs could decrease at a faster rate than gas price fluctuations, as much of the natural gas is transported by pipeline rather than via shipping. In contrast, oil prices are globally influenced and typically higher. Consumers in the U.S., the largest oil-producing nation, face unprecedented fuel costs.

More individuals are considering purchasing EVs, asserts Enver, while governments should facilitate this transition, as the “superlever” of EV adoption could potentially reduce costs for fossil fuel-importing nations by one-third.

Nonetheless, as the average vehicle lifespan nears 20 years, the full impact of this transition will take time, according to energy consultant Michael Liebreich of Liebreich Associates. The shift from natural gas to renewable energy is already perceptible and will persist, even as gas prices decline.

“The assumption that gas demand will grow in a world equipped with affordable wind, solar, and battery storage—while increasingly shunning global commodity markets—is misguided. That era is over,” Liebreich concluded.

Topics:

This revised content includes SEO-friendly phrases and maintains the necessary HTML structure as you requested.

Source: www.newscientist.com