Who Will Purchase MP3 Players in 2025? The Limits of Music Streaming | Gadgets

wI was just 18 when I got my hands on a Minidisc player, which had seen better days in terms of popularity. While it might not have been the most “fashionable” choice at the time, I absolutely loved it. I vaguely recall picking up packs at Poundland, building a vibrant library of affordable music before Spotify even existed.


This week, as I published articles about the MP3 players that revolutionized portable audio technology, I reflected on how they ultimately overshadowed my beloved Minidisc players. To be fair, MP3 playback is merely one of many file formats supported by modern digital audio players—perhaps a more fitting term.

For a period, I sensed that music streaming didn’t quite satisfy my needs. Yes, the ability to access an entire music library at your fingertips is a technological marvel, but it also leads to “choice paralysis” akin to being a child in a candy store. More crucially, it’s not your music.

Frustration with Algorithms

While exploring modern players for this piece, I found that I’m not alone in feeling disconnected from today’s streaming landscape. Chris Laidler, office manager at Advanced MP3 Players, provided insights into the type of individuals who opt out of the streaming norm—my kind of people.

When he began his career in 2017, his customers largely comprised a niche audiophile community, “pursuing high-resolution audio as a hobby,” he shares. These were people “more invested in technology than in music.”

However, since the onset of Covid, this clientele has expanded to include more casual buyers. For some, nostalgia plays a role, but there are also more practical motivations.

“It liberates them from the algorithm,” Laidler explains. “They seek out music on their own terms. This also means they have a device to store the music they genuinely own, rather than subscribing to Spotify.”

For true audio enthusiasts, smartphone audio simply falls short. “Consider your phone’s size,” Raidler gestures, “which features only a small DAC [digital-to-analog converter].” On the flip side, a dedicated MP3 player offers an entire setup designed for optimal music reproduction. And yes, that includes a standard wired audio jack—take note, Apple!

Generally, some acknowledge the steep entry price, even if they appreciate the concepts. For reference, my investment landed around £650, but top-tier technology can soar into the thousands. However, don’t fret! My more budget-friendly pick, the impressive Snowkey Echo Mini at £66.99, provides great value. After a certain price point, you’re more likely chasing a specific sound signature than an evident leap in quality.

The Tyranny of Choice

Ironically, as you try to make a selection, the abundance of options can mirror the overwhelming experience of scrolling through Spotify. “At audio trade shows, visitors come equipped with notebooks, taking notes on each player’s characteristics and prices,” Laidler recounts. “Yet, when you see these same individuals returning the following year, and you ask them, ‘So, which one did you choose?’—they’re still undecided.”

Should I opt for an older MP3 player? They have limitations in terms of storage, file format compatibility, and warranties. “From a nostalgia standpoint, they’re fantastic,” says Raidler.

“I enjoy showcasing these vintage players during our exhibitions and meetings because we can’t access them easily; perhaps we should even start a museum!”


This Week’s Selection


Editor’s Choice




Is it raining at the parade? It’s not about wearing the right clothes. Photo: Cicy/Getty Images/Istockphoto

You step out into glorious sunshine only to arrive at an office that resembles a death chamber. Your inexpensive emergency umbrella keeps flipping inside out. Yes, autumn weather is back with a vengeance. How do you maintain style amidst potential downpours? Fashion writer Charlotte Gornor has all the solutions for adding a layer of sophistication to any outfit, including waxed hoods and stylish caps.

Monica Hollige
Associate Editor, Filter


In Case You Missed It…




A few replacements and a little hydration of your beauty routine can repair summer’s damage. Photo: Westend61/Getty Images

Let’s be real: Have you overlooked rinsing your hair every time you hit the beach this summer? Did you miss applying sunscreen to every part of your body before venturing outside? And are you hoping to prolong that summer glow? (All three apply here.)

Hayley Spencer’s guide offers remedies to heal your skin, hair, and nails after a sun-soaked summer. We’re especially fond of this drunken elephant scrub, which not only helps remove dead skin cells and debris that can clog pores, but also enhances moisture penetration, ensuring your skin remains hydrated and radiant. More glow, please!


Get Involved




What’s your secret to kicking off the day right—a cup of coffee or a breath of fresh air? Photo: Stephen Chong/Aramie

Whether you’re an early bird or a night owl, what’s your secret to enhancing your mornings? Waking up to a radio alarm instead of your phone? An amazing cup of coffee? Some gentle stretches? Or perhaps an eye mask that grants you an extra 30 minutes of sleep? Share your thoughts by replying to this newsletter or email thefilter@theguardian.com.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Zuckerberg explains decision to purchase Instagram and WhatsApp instead of building the app from scratch

During the second day of the Landmark antitrust trial, Meta Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg explained his decision to acquire Instagram and WhatsApp, citing the difficulty of building a new app. He avoided addressing questions about potential competitive threats to the company.

Zuckerberg mentioned that building a new app is a challenging task and that the company had attempted to create multiple apps in the past without much success. He acknowledged that they could have developed an app, but success was not guaranteed.

His testimony is crucial in the antitrust trial at the U.S. District Court in the District of Columbia. The trial focuses on allegations that Meta engaged in anti-competitive practices through its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp.

If the government succeeds, Meta could be required to divest these two apps.

However, legal experts believe the FTC faces significant challenges in proving its case. The lawsuit against Meta forms part of broader efforts by U.S. regulators to address the market power of major tech companies.

The trial against Meta comes amidst similar legal actions against other tech giants like Amazon, Google, and Apple for alleged anti-competitive behavior.

In a closely watched trial, the FTC accused Meta of using its acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp to stifle competition and limit consumer choice.

Meta’s legal team refuted the allegations, highlighting the company’s competition with other social media platforms. They argued that revisiting and undoing the merger approval would set a dangerous precedent.

During Tuesday’s proceedings, FTC lawyers questioned Zuckerberg about internal communications related to the acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp, revealing discussions about competition and strategic decisions.

Zuckerberg’s testimony spanned seven hours, with Instagram co-founders scheduled to testify later in the week.

In emails from years ago, Zuckerberg discussed the competitive landscape and strategic moves to maintain Facebook’s dominance in the market. These communications have become central to the antitrust trial.

Zuckerberg’s emails revealed concerns about emerging competitors and strategies to block them from advertising on Facebook. The trial continues to scrutinize Meta’s actions in the competitive tech industry.

Zuckerberg’s communications shed light on the company’s approach to competition and strategic acquisitions, raising questions about its impact on the tech industry.

As the trial progresses, stakeholders are closely watching the outcome and its implications for the regulation of big tech companies.

Source: www.nytimes.com

Last Minute Purchase Bid at the TikTok Ban Deadline

The future of Tiktok in the United States is once again on the line. Following years of debates over whether to ban domestic apps, the deadline for the company to sell or transfer assets to non-Chinese owners is approaching on April 5th. Donald Trump has stated that his administration is nearing a deal with the app.

A few potential buyers have expressed interest in acquiring the immensely popular social media app. Reports have surfaced suggesting various deals, such as investments from Trump-friendly venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz and bids from Amazon. In January, the president signed an executive order extending the ban or sale deadline to April. Despite his recent remarks expressing his desire to see Tiktok continue operating, the future for Tiktok and its 170 million US users remains uncertain.

In light of imposing sweeping tariffs on numerous countries, including China, Trump hinted during an Air Force event that trade penalties could be eased if the Chinese company owning Tiktok agrees to the sale.

Bytedance has stated that they have no intentions of selling the app, with court filings deeming the sale “simply impossible.” Bytedance and Tiktok have not responded to requests for comments.

The notion of banning Tiktok was first raised by Trump in 2020, citing national security risks posed by Chinese-owned apps. The issue garnered bipartisan support, leading to Congress overwhelmingly voting to ban the app last year. In January, the US Supreme Court sided with Congress, upholding federal law calling for the sale or ban of Tiktok. The original deadline was set for January 19th.

On the eve of the deadline, Tiktok ceased operations with a message stating, “I’m sorry, but Tiktok is currently unavailable.” Apple and Google also removed the app from their stores to comply with federal law. The social media company expressed gratitude that President Trump was willing to work towards a solution to bring Tiktok back online.

On his first day in office, Trump extended the deadline for the ban or divestment of Tiktok to the 75th. The looming deadline is now fast approaching.

Initially proposing a ban on Tiktok, Trump later joined the app and amassed millions of followers while campaigning for the presidency. He previously vowed to support Tiktok’s presence in the US and has endeavored to fulfill that promise.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Recent reports from CBS suggest that Trump is considering final proposals for Tiktok, including bids from various investors in private equity, venture capital, and the high-tech industry. Investors like Blackstone and Oracle are among those interested in acquiring Tiktok. Oracle, co-founded by Trump’s ally Larry Ellison, has been eyeing Tiktok’s profitable stake for years.

Analysts believe that it is highly unlikely for Tiktok to face another ban. Speculations point towards a potential sale or another form of expansion. The key question revolves around whether the algorithm will be included in the sale, as Tiktok without its algorithm would significantly impact its power and appeal.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Alphabet’s Google Parent Company makes historic purchase of cybersecurity firm Wiz

Alphabet, the owner of Google, has agreed to purchase Cybersecurity Group Wiz for $32 billion (£24.7 billion).

Google is acquiring an Israeli startup in an effort to compete with rivals Microsoft and Amazon in the cloud services market.

Wiz provides services that scan data from cloud storage providers like Amazon Web Services and Microsoft Azure for security risks. It previously turned down Alphabet’s $23 billion bid last summer.

However, concerns about regulatory approval caused some issues with the initial bid.

If the deal falls through, Alphabet has agreed to pay a $3.2 billion fee. This acquisition indicates a test of the Trump administration’s willingness and shows President Biden’s leadership in acquiring major technology companies.

Alphabet is currently facing pressure from US Department of Justice officials to sell off its Chrome browser to address concerns about its dominance in the search market.

Wiz, founded in 2020 by graduates of the Israeli Intelligence Corps, has offices in New York and Israel, with its European headquarters in London.

Despite the acquisition, Wiz will operate independently from Google, similar to how Microsoft operates LinkedIn.

Wiz will continue to collaborate with major cloud platforms such as Amazon Web Services, Microsoft Azure, and Oracle Cloud.




Wiz co-founder and CEO Assaf Rappaport will remain in his position until October 2024. Photo: Bloomberg/Getty

“We’re excited for the future,” said Sundar Pichai, Google’s CEO. “Google Cloud and Wiz will enhance cloud security and multi-cloud capabilities. Businesses and governments operating in the cloud seek stronger security solutions and a wider range of cloud computing providers.”

Startup CEO Assaf Rappaport previously rejected Alphabet’s $23 billion offer to focus on growth and potentially going public.

Analyst Dan Ives from Wedbush commented on the acquisition, highlighting Wiz’s strong presence in the cloud cybersecurity industry.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Google’s move to acquire Wiz is seen as a strategic step to compete with other tech giants like Microsoft and Amazon in the cloud security space.

Wiz currently generates $750 million in annual revenue, and Google aims to capitalize on the company’s market position for future growth.

Alphabet’s previous acquisitions include Motorola Mobility, Mandiant, YouTube, and Deep Mind as part of its strategy to diversify from search-related ads.

With Wiz’s expertise, Alphabet hopes to gain a larger share of the global cloud market, currently lagging behind Microsoft Azure and Amazon Web Services.

Analyst Dan Ives sees Google’s acquisition of Wiz as a strategic move to enhance cloud security offerings and drive cloud and AI initiatives forward.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Donald Trump alleges Tesla boycott is “illegal”, plans to purchase company in support of mask production

Donald Trump announced that he was purchasing a “brand new Tesla” and placed blame on the “radical left-handed man” who he claimed was orchestrating an “illegal” boycott. This announcement followed a significant drop in Tesla’s stock price, the worst in nearly five years.

During a press conference, President Trump also declared his intention to classify the violence against Tesla showrooms as domestic terrorism, responding to a reporter’s suggestion that such actions should be labeled as such.

He mentioned that he had spoken with Elon Musk and his son on his White House driveway, with a selection of Tesla cars parked for his choosing. Trump ultimately opted for a red Model S, praising Musk’s contributions to the country.

Trump went on to accuse the “radical left madman” of attempting to illegally boycott Tesla and harm the American automaker, posting his remarks on True Social and affirming his commitment to stopping the damaging boycott efforts.

Despite claims of the boycott being illegal, the Supreme Court ruling from 1972 protects the right of Americans to peacefully protest against private companies, challenging Trump’s stance on the matter.

Tesla’s stock has seen significant declines amid protests and threats linked to Trump’s tariff plans. The TeslaTakeown Group, organizing anti-Tesla protests, insists on their right to peaceful demonstrations outside Tesla showrooms.

Reports indicate a sharp drop in Musk’s net worth over the past year, impacting Tesla’s profits. Tesla board members, including Musk’s brother, have sold off millions in stocks, while Tesla car sales have also declined.

The boycott against Tesla emerged in response to Musk’s controversial “Doge” initiative and concerns over lack of transparency in federal spending. Polls suggest mixed public sentiment towards Musk’s influence and actions.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Is it possible to purchase 100 items for $15?

vIvi Armacost loves Temu. She uses the Chinese online market to buy craft supplies for hobbies like making wallets. “You can get the details and hardware of St. and Penny’s wallet,” said Armacost, who is 24 years old and lives in New York. She mentions that her apartment is mostly furnished from Temu.


Donald Trump’s 10% tariff on Chinese-made products sold in the United States was implemented early on Tuesday morning and could potentially alter shopping habits. Additionally, US postal services halted parcels coming from China and Hong Kong without explanation.

This tariff closes a trade loophole that allowed fast fashion companies like TEMU and Shein to ship packages valued at less than $800 to the US tax-free. This exemption, known as “De Minimus,” has faced criticism from both parties in recent years. According to a report by Reuters, Shein and Temu may raise prices due to the tariff, along with Amazon’s Haul, a new e-commerce app importing products from Chinese sellers.

Many shoppers are worried that the fees will impact their retail therapy.

“Trump is trying to get one last order from Temu before imposing another tariff on China.” Armacost jokingly commented on Tiktok, where she shared a comedy video capturing the situation. She mentioned having a friend who made a final Temu purchase at the last minute during the tariffs.




Vivi Armacost has a friend who made the final Temu Run. Photo: tiktok user @viviarmacost

Although TEMU was the most downloaded shopping app in 2023, SHEIN overshadowed it and became a favorite brand. Shein is primarily known for clothing, while Temu offers a variety of products including makeup, home supplies, and decorations. Despite their affordability -TEMU’s women’s sneakers are just over $4 and Temu’s bracelets are $1.45, many products are of questionable quality and end up in landfills.

“Many items are much smaller than expected,” Armacost notes. “I bought a desk lamp that could fit in my hand.”

Leading up to Trump’s tariff announcement, shoppers had been urging others to stock up on Temu and Shein products to prepare for potential taxes on goods from China. A Tiktok user commented, “It might be the last good Black Friday for a while due to tariffs,” suggesting it’s better to collect items now before prices potentially increase.

Shortly after the election, fashion writer Amy Odell advised readers in a warning message to shop now considering the potential impact of tariffs. Susan Scafidi, a lawyer and founder of Fordham’s Fashion Law Institute, expressed concerns about the implications of tariffs on fast fashion and consumer behavior.

Sheng Lu, a professor specializing in fashion and apparel research at the University of Delaware, believes that while tariffs may affect supply chains and consumer spending, large companies like SHEIN and TEMU are better equipped to handle the costs compared to small and medium-sized enterprises.


In 2023, the US Congress reported that Temu posed a “very high risk” with its supply chain potentially involving forced labor, while both SHEIN and TEMU avoided scrutiny of US human rights practices. Recent reports have uncovered labor issues within the companies, raising concerns about ethical practices.

The fast fashion industry is often associated with high carbon emissions and pollution, and experts fear that tariffs could exacerbate these environmental and labor issues.

Despite the potential drawbacks, Armacost acknowledges the consumer demand for these online retailers like Temu. “While excessive spending is concerning, it does stimulate the economy,” she remarks. “Why live in a country where you can’t order 100 items for $15?”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Trump alleges that Microsoft is in talks to purchase Titoku

Donald Trump has implied that Microsoft is in discussions with Tactoku and he is hoping for a bidding war on apps.

In response to whether Microsoft was considering acquiring an app, the US President stated, “I will say Jesus,” and added, “I have a lot of interest in Tiktok. Tactoku is of great interest.”

Microsoft, Tiktok, and Bytedance did not immediately respond to Reuters’ requests for comments outside of regular business hours following the US President’s remarks on Air Force 1 on Monday.


The reported remarks mark the second attempt to acquire Tiktok. During his first term, Trump had ordered Tactoku to divest its US operations citing national security concerns.

Microsoft emerged as a top bidder in 2020, but the negotiations quickly fell apart, and Trump’s push for the sale ended a few months later.

Tactoku, with approximately 170 million American users, faced an injunction from the Chinese owners to either comply with national security measures or face a ban on January 19. Shortly before this, the app was temporarily taken offline earlier this month.

Upon taking office on January 20, Trump signed a presidential order to delay the enforcement of the injunction by 75 days.


Last week, Trump revealed that he had discussed the purchase of Tactoku with multiple parties and would likely make a decision on the fate of the popular app within 30 days.

The US President had previously stated that he would be open to a sale of the Social Media App to the CEO of Tesla if interested, although Elon Musk has not publicly responded to Trump’s offer.

Recently, on Sunday, AI startup Perplexity AI proposed a merger with Tiktok. The US government informed Reuters on Sunday that it had invested in the future of the new company.

In 2021, Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella described Tiktok as “the oddest thing I’ve worked on.”

He mentioned to the US government, “There are specific requirements and then just disappear.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

MrBeast, a popular YouTube personality, joins efforts to purchase TikTok in the United States

MrBeast, a famous YouTube star and the highest-paid creator on the internet, has officially joined the bid to acquire TikTok’s US operations.

Teaming up with technology entrepreneur Jesse Tinsley, the 26-year-old made an all-cash offer for the social video app’s American division. This move follows President Donald Trump’s statement that US tech billionaires Elon Musk and Larry Ellison were interested in buying TikTok.

Known as Jimmy Donaldson, MrBeast has shown interest in acquiring TikTok through various social media posts. On January 13th, he mentioned in a post, “I’ll buy TikTok to avoid getting banned.” In subsequent TikTok posts, Donaldson revealed discussions with “a bunch of billionaires” regarding the bid.


American law firm Paul Hastings announced the bid for Donaldson in a statement on Tuesday. The statement mentioned Mr. Tinsley leading an investor group consisting of “institutional investors and high-net-worth individuals,” with Mr. Donaldson being the only publicly disclosed member.

While the size of the all-cash bid was not disclosed, Trump valued it at $1 trillion. With 346 million YouTube followers, MrBeast was the world’s top internet creator in the previous year, earning $85 million according to Forbes.

Paul Hastings also noted that Brad Bondi, the lawyer leading the team advising on the bid, is the brother of President Trump’s pick for U.S. attorney general, Pam Bondi.

President Trump mentioned potential agreements with Elon Musk and Larry Ellison, expressing openness to their bids to acquire TikTok. Ellison commented that it sounded like a “good deal.” Trump stated that TikTok would be allowed to operate in the US with 50% American ownership and a valuation of $1 trillion.

Despite TikTok returning online after temporary shutdown, its future in the US remains uncertain. The app faces a deadline of January 19 due to a requirement for the sale of its American division by its Chinese parent company, ByteDance.

President Trump issued an executive order halting enforcement of the sale requirement, providing assurances for TikTok’s operation. Some lawmakers question the legality of suspending the law, warning of potential consequences for businesses not complying.

TikTok, Google, and Apple have been approached for comments.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Elon Musk facing lawsuit from US government over undisclosed early Twitter stock purchase

U.S. financial regulators have charged Elon Musk with allegedly threatening other shareholders by not disclosing his ownership of Twitter shares and then acquiring the company’s shares at artificially low prices.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a lawsuit against Musk in federal court in Washington, D.C., accusing him of securities violations. The complaint states that Musk failed to disclose his 5% stake in the company in a timely manner and profited from the stock purchased after the filing deadline for ownership statements. The company ended up paying less than $1,000,000.

Musk purchased Twitter for $44 billion in 2022 and later rebranded the company as X. He acquired a 5% stake in the company before the purchase, which normally would require a public offering. The SEC claims that Musk disclosed his ownership on Twitter 11 days after the reporting deadline.

Musk’s lawyer, Alex Spiro, stated in an email that the SEC’s lawsuit is baseless, claiming that Musk did nothing wrong. This is not the first time Musk has been investigated by the SEC for his involvement with Twitter.

The SEC alleges that Musk delayed disclosing his ownership to the public and spent over $500 million on additional shares, potentially allowing the company to purchase stock at an artificially low price.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Despite Musk disclosing his ownership to the SEC 11 days later, he stated that he had acquired more than 9% of Twitter’s stock. The SEC noted that Twitter’s stock price rose by over 27% on that day.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Steven Mnuchin creates consortium to purchase TikTok | US News

According to CNBC, Steven Mnuchin is organizing a group of investors to purchase TikTok.

This development follows a recent bill passed by the US House of Representatives, giving ByteDance, the Chinese owner of TikTok, about six months to sell the app’s US assets or be subject to a ban. In the absence of a sale, app stores like Apple App Store and Google Play would not be allowed to host TikTok or provide hosting services to ByteDance-managed applications.


TikTok has labeled the bill as a “ban” and is urging Senators to consider their constituents’ opinions before making a decision.

In an interview with CNBC’s Squawk Box, Mnuchin expressed support for the bill and the sale of TikTok, emphasizing the app’s strong business potential.

While concerns about TikTok’s data collection practices have lingered for years, the recent bipartisan push for a forced sale poses a significant challenge to the app. The Senate is now faced with an uncertain vote on the matter after the House passed the bill with overwhelming support.

TikTok’s CEO has vowed to use legal means to oppose the ban, highlighting the potential negative impact on US jobs and the economy if the sale goes through.

Despite potential interest from other tech giants like Microsoft, Amazon, and Google to acquire TikTok, regulatory scrutiny and other challenges may complicate any acquisition attempts.

Mnuchin’s involvement in orchestrating the purchase of TikTok comes after his tenure as Treasury Secretary and recent investment activities through his private equity firm, Liberty Street Capital.

The Chinese government has criticized the House vote as an act of “robbery” in its attempt to force the sale of TikTok.

The future of the ban remains uncertain as Senate support for the bill is not yet clear. TikTok also faces uncertainties regarding the Chinese government’s approval of a US-based acquisition.

This recent bill is part of an ongoing political battle over TikTok, which has faced multiple bans and attempted bans in the past. Trump’s previous attempts to ban TikTok were blocked, but Biden has expressed willingness to sign the bill if it reaches his desk.

Source: www.theguardian.com

“China encourages the purchase of its electric cars – should I consider it?” | Driving

IIt’s the world’s largest car brand by sales of electric vehicles (EVs), but many people may have a hard time recognizing its name. Now Chinese company BYD (which stands for Build the Dream) is on a mission to get more British consumers into the hands of its “affordable” cars.

The company is one of the latest Chinese companies to enter the UK car market, claiming it is price competitive and has launched three cars since entering the UK last year.

But while the average UK driver might not be able to tell any of the Dolphin models apart from an Atto 3 or a Seal, the company is its home country’s biggest EV maker and is now setting its sights on Europe in a big way.

Greg Fairbotham of Zoom EV, which specializes in EV leasing and car sharing, says increased competition will encourage more people to electrify the roads. “And that should be considered a good thing,” he says.

So what should you know about BYD and how does it compare to its competitors?

What is its track record?

For the past decade, the company has been China’s largest EV manufacturer, producing 3.02 million vehicles in 2023. Late last year, it overtook Tesla to become the world’s largest electric car maker.

It’s rapid growth for the Shenzhen-based company, which started making cell phone batteries in 1995 and later branched out into cars. The company has been backed by US investment billionaire Warren Buffett since 2008. The company’s ambitious goals include plans to sell around 800,000 cars a year in Europe by 2030.

it is, observer It said it sold 1,100 cars in the UK between March last year and the end of December. Here are the figures from the Society of Motor Manufacturers and Trades (SMMT): 248 vehicles were sold here last month. The company says it is currently in stock at 24 dealers across the UK.

Perhaps the biggest advantage is that they manufacture their batteries and many other parts in-house.

Recently, parts shortages have been plaguing other manufacturers across the industry, resulting in longer repair times for consumers.

Steve Fowler, Editor auto express says other automakers don’t have the same level of control.

“The problems we’ve had in recent years with shortages of parts like microchips are not a problem for BYD,” he said.

Is that car okay?

Three models are available in the UK: Dolphin (from £30,195), Atto 3 (from £37,695) and Seal (from £45,695). Reviews are generally positive, but there are some concerns. According to Steve Huntingford, What car? the vehicle is “rather than great”.

“The main reason I buy now is because I want something a little different from the norm,” he says. “But while these cars are impressive enough on their own, in each case there are rival models from name brands that offer better performance and are available for the same or less money.”

The small Dolphin hatchback has been compared to the Peugeot e-208 and Vauxhall Corsa Electric, while the Ato 3 is similar to SUVs such as the Hyundai Kona Electric and Kia Niro EV. Seal, on the other hand, is more like an executive saloon like the Tesla Model 3.

“The Seal – BYD’s best current car, 4 stars What car? Review – Prices start from £45,695. The problem is that he can get a Tesla Model 3, which is actually an even better car in most respects, for £39,990,'' Huntingford says.

However, these prices could potentially fall. autotraders Erin Baker, because the price of the Atto 3 is significantly cheaper in China than in the UK.

“They could get a huge discount from the current price,” she says. “Even if they exported these cars and set up a retail environment to sell them in the UK, they could still make huge profits. They can actively destroy their own cars.”

What about insurance?

These days, electric vehicle drivers are finding it difficult to obtain competitively priced insurance. While drivers across the country typically face increases of more than 50% in their insurance premiums, EV owners often have to deal with even larger increases.

Tesla owners have seen their insurance go up from £1,200 to £5,000 a year. Some companies have seen insurance companies exit the market. Many EVs have expensive features, and the cost of repairing them spills over into insurance premiums.

Zoom EV says Because electric vehicles are relatively new, there isn’t enough data for companies to assess the risks, driving the estimates higher.

Mr Fowler tested how much it would cost to insure a BYD seal on a 55-year-old man in Buckinghamshire who was looking for comprehensive insurance. He was offered his £1,541 as the cheapest option. He says insuring his Skoda and his Yeti in the same conditions would cost around £300.

please be careful of others

BYD is not the first major Chinese car manufacturer to enter the UK market, nor will it be the last. In his first three months of last year, the MG4 was his second best-selling EV after the Tesla Model Y. However, MG is one of the most famous brands in the UK, but since 2007 it has been owned by China’s SAIC.

On the other hand, another Chinese brand is Omoda will be available in the UK in March gasoline cars and electric cars. “This year he has four or five Chinese brands coming to the UK,” Baker says.

The expected boost is so big that analysts at bank UBS believe that by 2030, one in three EVs will be made in China.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Reliance reportedly nearing agreement to purchase Disney’s India operations

Reliance is reportedly close to agreeing to buy Disney’s India operations as Mukesh Ambani’s oil telecom empire looks to expand its digital and television assets.

Disney values ​​its India operations at about $10 billion, while Reliance pegs its assets at $7 billion to $8 billion, Bloomberg News reported on Monday. According to the report, a deal could be signed and announced as early as next month.

Reliance said in an earlier statement that the company is constantly evaluating properties for acquisition.

In 2019, Disney acquired 21st Century Fox’s entertainment assets for $71.3 billion, a move that was significantly strengthened by the addition of Star India.

The deal was critical to Disney’s global streaming expansion, giving Disney broadcast and streaming rights to Indian Premier League cricket matches, a number of multilingual television channels, and an interest in a Bollywood film production company. At the time of acquisition, Star’s Hotstar had approximately 150 million monthly active users.

Hotstar dominated India’s video streaming world for several more quarters, but its popularity grew after Reliance-backed Viacom18 secured five-year rights to stream IPL cricket matches for about $3 billion, and the situation has since changed. became tapered. Disney paid $3 billion for the same five-year rights to air the content on television.

Reliance has poached a number of top leadership and engineering talent to strengthen JioCinema over the past year, bringing premium content from HBO and NBC to its on-demand streaming service.

Disney’s Hotstar, which lost around 20 million subscribers this year as consumers flocked to JioCinema to watch IPL matches, has turned to the ongoing Cricket World Cup in hopes of winning back customers. Streaming for free to mobile viewers. Earlier this month, the Disney Streamer app took back the global on-demand video streaming record from JioCinema when a cricket match drew 35 million concurrent viewers. During Sunday’s India vs. New Zealand match, concurrent viewership jumped to 43 million viewers, breaking its own record.

Source: techcrunch.com