Cloudflare Outage Disrupts Websites Including LinkedIn and Zoom

A variety of websites, such as LinkedIn, Zoom, and Downdetector, experienced outages on Friday morning due to another incident involving Cloudflare. This marks the company’s second disruption within a month.

Cloudflare reported that the outage was triggered by adjustments made to their firewalls intended to protect customers from a widespread software vulnerability disclosed earlier this week, clarifying it was not the result of a cyber attack. Previously, another issue was observed concerning their application programming interface.

The incident lasted approximately 30 minutes, concluding shortly after 9 a.m. Japan time. This follows a larger Cloudflare outage in mid-November that impacted platforms like X, OpenAI, and Spotify, along with online games such as League of Legends.

The underlying issue was identified as “configuration files that are automatically generated to manage threat traffic,” which exceeded expected sizes, leading to a crash of the software system responsible for handling traffic across various Cloudflare services.

Friday’s malfunction appeared relatively minor, affecting sites including Canva, Shopify, and the India-based brokerage firm Groww, alongside LinkedIn, Zoom, and Downdetector, which tracks online service issues. Downdetector recorded over 4,500 reports related to Cloudflare once the services resumed.

Given the recent series of prominent internet outages, some businesses might be reevaluating their reliance on Cloudflare’s offerings.

Stephen Murdoch, a computer science professor at University College London, noted, “Given these two outages within such a brief timeframe, it’s likely people will begin to question their reliability. They’re not satisfied, and Cloudflare isn’t happy either. They apologize, but it’s premature to determine if there’s a systemic problem, like software misuse, or just unfortunate timing.”

Murdoch emphasized that Cloudflare, known for its global cloud services and cybersecurity, promotes itself on its reliability. Businesses utilize its services for enhanced immunity against specific cyber threats, improved website performance, faster load times, and greater resilience to server failures.

The recent outages from Amazon Web Services, including one in October that affected over 2,000 businesses globally, have sparked discussions among experts about whether major internet services are becoming overly centralized and thus more vulnerable.

“There’s significant centralization occurring,” Murdoch stated. “Cloudflare offers an excellent product and is widely used, which introduces potential vulnerabilities.”

“This highlights yet again how exposed the major tech internet is,” remarked Michał “Risiek” Wojniak, an expert on DNS and internet infrastructure. “This marks the fourth major global outage since October 20th that has drawn the attention of media outside of the tech sphere and affected everyday users around the globe.”

Skip past newsletter promotions

According to Cloudflare, around 20% of all websites utilize its services in one form or another. The company boasts nearly 300,000 clients in 125 countries and claims to thwart billions of cyberattacks against its users on a daily basis, generating over $500 million (£440 million) each quarter.

Wojniak stated that the recent outages raise questions about Cloudflare’s marketing strategy, which promotes reliability and resilience alongside the common belief that larger enterprises are safer partners than smaller infrastructure providers.

“These companies are growing too large to fail, and their extensive traffic handling means that when they do encounter issues, it leads to significant problems very quickly,” he added.

Conversely, Murdoch suggested that the outages could be an opportunity for Cloudflare. “When AWS went down, its stock price actually increased because people recognized the scale of its usage. [The outage] serves as effective marketing, demonstrating the widespread reliance on Cloudflare.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Apple iPhone 17 Pro Review: New Design, Same Focus on Zoom

The iPhone 17 Pro marks Apple’s most significant redesign in years, replacing the traditional titanium sides and all-glass back with a sleek aluminum unibody. It features a bold full-width camera bump on the back, offering a vibrant array of colors.


This alone makes the iPhone 17 Pro appealing for those eyeing an upgrade to the latest model. However, the price tag has increased to £1,099 (€1,299/$1,099/$1,999), making it the first of Apple’s smaller Pro phones to breach the £1,000 threshold.

From the front, it resembles a modern iPhone, with a dynamic island that houses a selfie camera situated at the top of its impressively bright and smooth display. This is undoubtedly one of the best screens on any phone, though it’s similar to the upgraded display of the regular iPhone 17 this year.




Higher peak brightness and a new anti-glare coating help reduce reflections in bright light, enhancing outdoor usability. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

The aluminum sides feature subtle rounding at the edges, providing a comfortable grip and minimizing slippage. Weighing over 200 grams, the phone leans towards the heavier side for a compact device.

A glass panel, slightly larger than a credit card, is embedded in the aluminum body to accommodate MagSafe or Qi2.2 chargers and accessories. The substantial metal “plateau” at the top houses a camera that surpasses the pixel camera bar in size. While aluminum won’t shatter upon impact like glass, it is prone to scratches, particularly around the edges of the plateau.




iOS 26’s home and lock screens exhibit a glass-like rounded appearance for text and icons. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

Powered by iOS 26, the iPhone 17 Pro showcases Apple’s innovative “Liquid Glass” interface design, which generally performs well, although it introduces some transparency effects for buttons and other elements.

Specifications

  • Screen: 6.3in Super Retina XDR (120Hz OLED) (460ppi)

  • Processor: Apple A19 Pro

  • RAM: 12GB

  • Storage: 256, 512GB, or 1TB

  • Operating System: iOS 26

  • Camera: 48MP main, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP 4x zoom, and 18MP front

  • Connectivity: 5G, WiFi 7, NFC, Bluetooth 6, Thread, USB-C, Satellite, UWB, GNSS

  • Water Resistance: IP68 (6 meters for 30 minutes)

  • Size: 150 x 71.9 x 8.75mm

  • Weight: 204g

Faster, Cooler A19 Pro Chip




The iPhone fully charges via USB-C in 76 minutes, or reaches 70% in 30 minutes with a 40W adapter (not included), and can be charged using a QI2 25W charger in 96 minutes. Belkin Ultracharge 2-in-1. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

Equipped with the new Apple A19 Pro chip, the 17 Pro is the first iPhone to feature a steam chamber cooling system. This technology, commonly seen in high-performance Android devices, dissipates heat from the chip throughout the phone, maintaining prolonged peak performance.

Extended gaming sessions lead to improved frame rates and reduced heat buildup, ensuring that the phone remains cooler than its predecessors.

The phone’s battery life is impressive, lasting around 42 hours on a blend of 5G and WiFi, with approximately 6 hours of active screen usage—around 2 hours longer than last year’s model. During heavy usage or gaming, the 17 Pro can still finish the day with roughly 25% battery remaining. Regular users may find they need to charge their phones every couple of days.

Sustainability




The camera plateau prevents the iPhone 17 Pro from wobbling on flat surfaces, unlike its predecessors. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

The battery is designed to endure over 1,000 full charge cycles while retaining at least 80% of its original capacity. Should you need a replacement, it costs £109, while a screen repair is priced at £349. Experts rated the phone a seven out of ten regarding repairability.

The device contains over 30% recycled materials, including aluminum, cobalt, copper, gold, lithium, rare earth elements, steel, tin, and tungsten. Apple is transparent about the environmental impact of its products in its reports. Additionally, the company promotes trade-in and free recycling programs, encompassing non-Apple products.

Camera




The streamlined camera app automates most features, with many functions tucked behind a sliding button. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

The rear boasts three 48MP cameras alongside an 18MP selfie camera, enhancing the front-facer with new capabilities.

The main and ultra-wide cameras are largely unchanged from last year, delivering impressive photos across various lighting scenarios, making them especially good for detailed street photography. The main camera provides twice as much crop zoom, yielding excellent detail and color in well-lit settings, though dim lighting may introduce some grain.

A key addition this year is the upgraded telephoto camera, featuring a 4x zoom at 48MP and 5x at 12MP. Much like the main camera, it allows for 8x crop zoom. It performs well in bright conditions, with some detail degradation at higher zoom levels, while remaining functional in indoor lighting as well.




The zoom capability stretches to a maximum of 40x magnification, with noticeable quality loss beyond 15-20x. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

Each of the three cameras comes equipped with numerous features, including top-tier video capabilities, and the option to record simultaneously from both the front and rear cameras, creating a picture-in-picture effect. Apple’s automatic portrait mode excels by working with both objects and subjects.

Notably, the selfie camera has received its first significant upgrade in years, featuring an 18MP sensor that incorporates Apple’s Center Stage technology, previously seen in iPads and Macs. It allows for automatic panning and zooming to keep you framed during video calls, and you can widen the shot for landscape selfies while in portrait mode. This clever design addresses the challenge of fitting multiple people into a shot without reorienting the phone.

Price

The iPhone 17 Pro starts at £1,099 (€1,299/$1,099/$1,999) for the model with 256GB of storage.

For context, the iPhone 16E is priced at £599, the iPhone 17 costs £799, the iPhone Air costs £999, the iPhone 17 Pro Max is listed at £1,199, the Google Pixel 10 Pro retails for £999, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is £1,099, and the FairPhone 6 is available for £499.

Verdict

The 17 Pro represents the most distinct iPhone evolution in years, and despite its functional variations from recent models, it is instantly recognizable.

Its new aluminum unibody design feels premium, although it may be more susceptible to scratches than glass. With top-notch performance and display, the battery life is commendable for such a compact device. Overall, it’s an excellent iPhone and a high-quality smartphone.

However, this year it faces competition from the Spotlight Super Susane iPhone Air and the enhanced standard iPhone 17.

The camera stands out as a significant differentiating factor, with the 17 Pro featuring superior camera capabilities, including a newly enhanced telephoto lens. This makes it one of the best camera phones available.

Consequently, for iPhone enthusiasts keen on excellent telephoto capabilities, the 17 Pro is the ideal choice—albeit at a premium price.

Pros: Enhanced 4x/8x telephoto, upgraded selfie camera, impressive display, USB-C, solid battery life, excellent performance, long-term software support, Face ID, and a compact design make it a remarkable camera.

Cons: Premium pricing, heavier than previous models, absence of cutting-edge AI features compared to rivals, and similar screen and size available in more affordable models.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Cafe Owner Emily Watkins: Zoom Calls, Space Hogging, and Lap Topper Attitude

o
After a period of time, smoking indoors, wearing a flamboyant wide tie, and typing away on a typewriter at the office desk became socially acceptable. Norms evolve, and that’s often for the best. However, when it comes to cafe laptops, I urge society to reconsider. Don’t be the nuisance in my cafe – that’s the only place that keeps a solitary freelancer like me going, similar to the WFH Brigade.

My kitchen table, where I spend most of my working hours, is adequate. There’s a window nearby. You can make yourself a cup of tea whenever you please. You can transition to the couch, listen to your own music, take loud calls, or stand up. But variety is the spice of life, and if cafes were my only option, I’d truly be disheartened. Yes, I’m aware of coworking spaces, but they are a) filled with unpleasant individuals, and b) not within my budget. Thankfully, the calming ambient noise of distant conversations, keyboard clicks, is as close to a cafe as I can get for now.

The freedom to work from anywhere is one of the perks of being a writer, but this privilege is being misused by fellow laptop users, risking its potential revocation. Clogging up tables, engaging in hours of minimal spending, the antics of cafe owners – just buying a cup of tea and occupying space all day is clearly rude, not to mention bad for business.

It’s undeniable that a sea of laptops alters the ambiance of a place, transforming friendly hangouts to unbearable coworking spots. Consequently, our laptop-user to other patron ratio needs to be managed diligently. After years of observing this trend – even before the pandemic hit, I’ve drafted a code of conduct to maintain harmony within the cafe laptop ecosystem. And it’s essential to adhere to it, as if we continue to disrupt this balance, it might be back to the kitchen table for good.


The initial rule is to limit laptop usage in cafes to four hours and spend around £5 on two items. If you plan to occupy the space all day, you must also order at least one meal. Additionally, no Zoom calls or phone conversations are permitted under any circumstances. The objective of working with a laptop in a cafe is to blend in seamlessly, rather than disrupting the environment with endless productivity tasks. If you need to make a call, stay at home or step outside.

It goes without saying that you should choose the smallest available table. Don’t occupy a larger table when it’s just you and your laptop. Furthermore, if power outlets are visibly accessible, don’t hassle the staff to charge your devices. They are there to serve food and drinks, not to make your impromptu office setup easier. And of course, do not play loud music. It shouldn’t need to be said, but a recent encounter at a coffee shop proved otherwise. I wonder what he’s reading now. Otherwise, our refuge in local cafes is at risk.

In conclusion, be respectful, pay your dues, and don’t take advantage of the privilege of being in a cafe. Essentially: Don’t abuse the system.

Many British people abroad may wish to hide me under a rock or imagine French accents. While I feel ashamed to be grouped with them, there’s no reason why we can’t change the narrative.

Cafes not only provide a conducive work environment but also serve as a natural habitat. As historical origins suggest, they have always been a breeding ground for ideas. The vibrant, intellectual cafe setting is often what’s needed to spark creativity, while also reminding us of the presence of others (a aspect often missing in traditional office settings). It’s truly a valuable resource that shouldn’t be taken for granted. If cafes were no longer an option, and the kitchen table or coworking spaces were the only alternatives, I might have to reluctantly resort to seeking traditional employment.

  • Do you have any opinions on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to send a response of up to 300 words by email to consider being published in our Letters section, please click here.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Review: Nothing Phone 3A Pro – A Stylish Midrange Smartphone with Impressive Zoom Camera

Nothing, based in London, has introduced a top-tier phone that stands out from cheaper mid-range models with its more affordable price and high-quality camera zoom.

The battle for mobile phone cameras has always been competitive, with each brand striving for better quality, longer reach, and multiple lenses. While many advancements have trickled down to cheaper models, optical zoom cameras have remained above the £600 mark.

Priced at £449 (459 Euro/$459/$849), Nothing’s offering is quite compelling.

The phone is based on the excellent 2A model, featuring striking “Glyph” LED strips that light up in intricate patterns for various notifications and functions.

The three “Glyph” light strips around the camera bumps are a visually appealing feature, especially when the phone is face-down. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

The design of the phone is accentuated by the large camera cluster at the back, which protrudes significantly. The 3A Pro boasts glass on the front and back, with high-quality plastic sides.

Featuring a large and vibrant OLED screen, the phone also includes a fast optical fingerprint scanner located at the bottom of the screen.

specification

  • screen: 6.77in 120Hz FHD+ OLED (387PPI)

  • Processor: Qualcomm Snapdragon 7S Gen 3

  • Ram: 12GB

  • Storage: 256GB

  • operating system: Nothing OS3.1 (Android 15)

  • camera: 50MP Main, 50MP 3X Tele, 8MP Ultra Addie, 50MP Selfie

  • Connectivity: 5G, ESIM, WiFi 6, NFC, Bluetooth 5.4, and GNSS

  • water resistance: IP64 (spray resistant)

  • size: 163.5 x 77.5 x 8.4mm

  • Weight: 211g

The battery can fully charge in 80 minutes and reach 50% in 25 minutes using a 50W USB-C power adapter (sold separately). Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

The 3A Pro is powered by Qualcomm’s mid-range Snapdragon 7S Gen 3 chip, offering a balance of performance without feeling sluggish. The battery life is impressive, lasting around 3 days with general use.

Running on Nothing OS version 3.1, the 3A Pro provides a unique user experience with customization options and AI tools like Gemini. The AI-powered screen capture and note-taking features show promise but may need further refinement.

The 3A Pro’s camera setup includes a 50MP main camera, 50MP 3X telephoto lens, and an 8MP ultrawide lens, delivering solid performance and real optical zoom capabilities.

Sustainability

The dedicated button on the side of the phone provides quick access to screen capture and note-taking features. Photo: Samuel Gibbs/The Guardian

Nothing promises the 3A Pro’s battery will maintain at least 90% capacity after 1,200 full charge cycles, showcasing its sustainability focus. The materials used in the phone’s construction include recycled aluminum, copper, plastic, steel, tin, and other elements.

price

The Nothing Phone 3a Pro is priced at £449 (459 Euro/$459/$849).

Compared to competitors like the Google Pixel 8A and Samsung Galaxy A56, Nothing’s offering stands out with its unique design, camera capabilities, and long-term software support.

verdict

The Nothing Phone 3A Pro is a solid contender in the mid-range smartphone market, offering a combination of impressive features, sleek design, and long-term support.

Strong Points: A great camera with 3x optical zoom, interesting design, 6 years of support, excellent screen, solid performance, long battery life, excellent fingerprint scanner, and excellent software with splash resistance.

Cons: AI requires work and cannot customize additional buttons. Only three years of Android version updates have a huge camera cluster protruding from the back.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Skype and Zoom Answered the Call and Transformed Human Interaction: John Norton’s Perspective

sO Microsoft It's decided An internet telephony company purchased it for $8.5 billion (£6.6 billion) in 2011 to end Skype. Millions of unfortunate users flock to the Microsoft Team, a virtual camp with a brain-dead aesthetic that even Zoom looks cool. This unforeseen situation has been telegraphed for quite some time, but even so, Skype is an astounding venture, and its ending mise is brought as a shock as it closes an interesting chain chapter in technological history.

The Internet has been around for a long time than most people notice. It dates back to the 1960s and back to the creation of Alpanet, a military computer network that emerged after the US had the “Sputnik moment.” It's a terrible perception that the Soviet Union appears to be moving forward with technology interests. The Internet design used today, the successor to Arpanet, began in the early 1970s and was first switched in January 1983.

From the start, the network designers decided to avoid limitations on previous communication systems, particularly voice-optimized analog telephone networks. This was owned by companies that were hopeless about digital signals and resisted innovation that they themselves had not been generating. Therefore, new networks have no owners or are not optimized for a particular medium, making them more tolerant than previous networks. Anyone can access it and create a service run as long as the computer meets the network's protocols.

As a result, we are an explosion of creativity that we live together today. What the Internet designers built was what scholars later called “an architecture for unauthorized innovation.” Or, in another way, global Platform for gushing surprises.

Created by Tim Berners-Lee in the late 1980s, the World Wide Web was one of those surprises. However, there was also something called VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol). Speeches can be digitized (one and zero) and placed in data packets that can be sent over the Internet. And after reaching the destination it was converted to audio. Results: Free telephony anywhere in the world!

Skype was the first company to bring this magic to ordinary consumers. Founded in 2003 by Janus Friis (A Dane) and Niklas Zennström (Swedish) and headquartered in Luxembourg. However, the software that was equipped with it was written by three Estonians who also wrote peer-to-peer file sharing software. In 2005, eBay bought it for $2.6 billion (£2 billion). By 2006 there were 100 million registered users, and by 2009 it had added about 380,000 new users every day, generating approximately $740 million (£575 million) in annual revenue. So, Skype was the first European company to reach US-level size.

At that point, something inevitable happened: in 2011 Skype was purchased by Microsoft and absorbed by Tech Colossus' Maw. Many observers, including this columnist, wondered what Microsoft thought was doing with the new toy. Last week's news suggests that the company never understood it. Either way, after the pandemic arrived in 2020 and people started working from home, it was clear that Microsoft needed to have something to drive away the threat posed by Zoom. Skype may have probably become the core of that response, but instead the decision was made to place all the energy to make the team a Behemoth answer to remote working. Since then, Skype has been surplus to the requirements and dies have been cast.

But before it disappears, it is worth remembering that it was on the scene 20 years ago. Today, most people don't know how close telephony is, in the analog era, is, closed and depressing. It was an industry run by either a complacent, unresponsive, dominant monopoly (USA AT&T) or governmental institutions (UK GPOs). It may take several months to install a phone in your home. The phones were expensive and international calls were actively prohibited.

I grew up in the country (Ireland) with a huge diaspora at a time when calls from the US only meant one family death. If immigrants were in touch with people returning home, it was just letters and perhaps a strange parcel. It's not a phone call. In rural Ireland, their families will occasionally wake up the night before their sons and daughters leave for America or Australia.

And now? The VoIP technology that Skype brings to people's lives is commoditized. Social media platforms like WhatsApp and Signal offer unlimited and free audio (and video) connections with friends, family and colleagues around the world. Calls that were once bankrupt are made every day. Microsoft may not have thought that Skype would ultimately help. But the rest of us certainly did.

What I've read

3 Market Economy
Dave Karpf's A sharp essay Identify the three types of money behind the power of Silicon Valley.

I will take home sovereignty
an An insightful editorial in Norma Why the current and the 47th President is acting like the 25th by Nathan Gardells.

A story of battle
David Allen Green is in the offshore earthquake control collision Foresightful analysis in Financial Times.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Navigating Zoom calls in 2025: Managing small group meetings with stationary backgrounds on the internet

WWhether it’s catching up with colleagues or gathering to set New Year’s resolutions, many of us will be reconnecting via Zoom, Teams, or Google Meet on Monday morning. But while such platforms have revolutionized flexible remote work in recent years, scientists are increasingly realizing that they can have a negative impact on people’s energy levels and self-esteem. So how can you have a healthier relationship with video conferencing in 2025?

Psychologists coined the term relatively early in the pandemic. “Zoom fatigue” Learn about the physical and psychological fatigue that can result from using video conferencing platforms such as Zoom for long periods of time. We found that people who had longer meetings using technology or who had a negative attitude toward meetings were more likely to feel: They made me even more exhausted..

Further research has found that the use of the self-view feature, which allows you to control whether your video is shown on screen during a meeting, is associated with increased fatigue levels. “We also found a gender effect, with women reporting more Zoom fatigue than men,” said Dr. Anna Carolina Queiroz, associate professor of interactive media at the University of Miami in Florida, who has been involved in these studies. says.

An insight from her the study People tend to feel more connected to others through frequent, short, and small group video calls rather than long meetings with many participants. This is likely because it takes longer to maintain nonverbal communication cues, such as eye contact, with many people. A lot of mental effort.

Those who are more sensitive to these communication cues may be more negatively affected, which may explain why women, who often feel greater pressure to present a positive image of themselves on video, tend to feel more fatigued. That could help explain things, Queiroz said.

She suggests keeping online meetings as short and small as possible and taking breaks between meetings to improve cognitive performance.

another the study This suggests that people who spend a lot of time video conferencing may become more conscious of their appearance and may be more likely to report greater dissatisfaction with it. Some people become so preoccupied with perceived flaws that they become anxious about attending gatherings and seek cosmetic surgery to change their appearance.

Dr. George Klompouzos, a professor of dermatology at Brown University and a practicing dermatologist, says, “If you’re worried about imperfections, continued exposure to images of yourself in virtual meetings tends to make those problems worse.” “There is,” he says. “Zoom dysmorphia is at least as common as body dysmorphia, which is a painful or disabling form of perceived or real defect that affects about 2% of the general population.” I’m thinking about it.

Dr. Cemre Turk, a dermatologist and postdoctoral fellow at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, US, says that Zoom dysmorphia is very likely to cause an increase in body dysmorphia, which can be devastating to people’s work and personal lives. It said it was important to identify it because it could have an impact. , in collaboration with Kroumpouzos. screening questionnaire It could help identify and treat more such patients.

Even if frequent video conferencing didn’t motivate people to seek facial surgery or “tweaks,” something else did. Recent research suggests It can unconsciously shape purchasing decisions in other ways.

Li Huang, Ph.D., an assistant professor of marketing at Hofstra University in New York, and his colleagues used a combination of eye tracking and surveys to determine how people liked different products after participating in different types of Zoom video calls and in-person meetings. Interest was assessed. Researchers found that video calls increased people’s anxiety about being negatively evaluated by others, whether they realized it or not, and increased their interest in self-help products in the aftermath of the call. It turns out.

Although it may sound negative, “this could actually have some positive consequences,” Huang said. “People are increasingly interested in self-improvement products, but this is not limited to body improvement products such as facial creams, but more general forms such as signing up for a LinkedIn learning course or participating in a health check-up. It also includes self-improvement.

“Most of the time, we are unaware that these types of virtual interactions are affecting our psychological well-being, and we may end up making impulse purchases online without knowing why. By learning about these findings, people can try to reduce these types of impacts.”

For example, the study found that this effect was reduced if study participants were able to turn off their webcams or use ring lights to emphasize their appearance during calls.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Switching to “Speaker View” instead of “Gallery View” and turning off “Self View” can also help, and asking participants to write about their strengths and characteristics after the call can also boost self-esteem. It was helpful.

Another factor that may help reduce the negative effects of video calls is zoom the background Selected. Dr. Heng Chan of Nanyang Technological University in Singapore and his colleagues assessed how tired people felt after video conferencing and found that virtual video backgrounds, such as videos of swaying palm trees or waves crashing on a beach, were associated with feelings of fatigue. I discovered that it does. There is a feeling of fatigue at the highest level, followed by a blurred background. Perhaps this is because the brain is forced to work harder by constantly reacting to new visual information, including the occasional intrusion of unblurred objects, Chan said.

People looking at static virtual backgrounds felt the least fatigued, especially if it was a nature-based image, and another study suggests it may have a calming effect. Masu.

The study didn’t assess the impact of people using real-world backgrounds, but Zhang, who uses backgrounds of trees and mountains for his video calls, said still images were still better. I think it might be better. “If you have your own office, that’s fine, but if you’re in a coffee shop or working outside, there’s a chance that people will be walking behind you or something else will happen that will distract your brain. Yes,” says Chan. “Even if you have your own office, you might be distracted by your personal belongings or worried about what others think of you.”

Huang hopes that in addition to using insights like this to help individuals protect themselves from the negative emotional impact of video conferencing, platforms will also take steps to foster a more positive user experience. I’m here. For example, instead of offering standard beauty filters, you can allow users to adjust lighting and background blur to improve their look more seriously.

“Increasing autonomy over privacy settings, such as controlling who can see and when, could also help reduce the pressure on users to always be visible to many people in meetings,” she said. I say.

Platforms could also consider leveraging artificial intelligence to detect signs of emotional distress in people’s voices and facial expressions, offering features such as discreet breaks and mindfulness exercises to help manage emotions. says Huang.

Source: www.theguardian.com