New Research Reveals Ancient Americans as Specialized Hunters of Large Animals

A recent study reveals that the earliest human cultures in the Americas were not simply opportunistic foragers. Instead, they were specialized big game hunters who dedicated their lives to hunting large animals like mammoths, elephant-like gomphotheres, and giant ground sloths—true Ice Age giants.



Paleoindians hunting glyptodonts, relatives of armadillos from the Pleistocene. Illustrated by Heinrich Harder, 1920.

For decades, archaeologists have debated whether Paleoindians focused on hunting megafauna or adopted a generalist lifestyle, consuming a diverse diet that included small game, fish, plants, and shellfish based on their environment.

In recent years, many scientists have leaned toward a generalist perspective. However, a new study led by the University of Alaska Fairbanks contradicts this notion.

Ben Potter, a professor at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, stated, “One of the competing theories is dietary generalization, which advocates for utilizing a wide variety of resources varying by region.”

“The other theory posits megafauna specialization, concentrating on a select few large-bodied prey.”

In this groundbreaking study, researchers analyzed 50 sites across three regions: Eastern Beringia (ancient Alaska, circa 14,000 to 13,300 years ago), the Clovis Culture of North America (approximately 13,400 to 12,800 years ago), and the Fishtail Projectile Point Culture of South America (roughly 12,900 to 11,600 years ago).

Together, these cultures represent the oldest known human societies extending across the Western Hemisphere.

By assessing factors such as species richness, minimum population size, and edible biomass, scientists discovered that megafauna constituted 83% to 88% of the meat and fat consumed by these groups.

Woolly mammoths dominated Beringia diets, while Columbian mammoths were prevalent in North America, and giant ground sloths along with gomphotheres were staples in South America.

While small animals were present in many locales, they provided minimal nutritional value.

“Evaluating culinary expertise involves more than identifying the number of specific animals at ancient campsites,” notes Professor Potter.

“If early humans were dietary generalists, the most common animals would be reflected more frequently in their campsites.”

“Mammoths and ground sloths were relatively rare in the environment, yet they dominate the archaeological record.”

“Conversely, rabbits and rats, despite being numerous, are seldom found in the record.”

The authors also cite independent evidence: chemical analysis of the Clovis-era child, Anzick-1, showed that about 96% of the mother’s proteins were derived from megafauna, primarily mammoths.

In addition to their diets, these early groups exhibited traits characteristic of professional hunters. They led highly mobile lifestyles rather than establishing fixed homesteads, and there was scant evidence of plant-processing tools such as grindstones.



Maps and dietary analysis illustrating how three Paleoindian cultures, East Beringian, Clovis, and Fishtail Projectile Point, specialized in hunting megaherbivores across the Western Hemisphere from about 14,000 to 11,600 years ago. Image credit: Ben Potter.

Professor Potter elaborated: “The focus on large edible herbivores explains the remarkable similarity in early toolkits found from California to Maine and across South America.”

“Hunters targeting the same type of animals across vastly different landscapes did not need to modify their methods to adapt to local conditions.”

“Archaeological findings included tools specifically designed for hunting large game, such as large fluted projectiles and specialized equipment for slaughtering.”

There was a significant absence of fishing tools and implements for processing plants.

This emphasis on large prey facilitated the rapid human expansion from Alaska to South America.

Typically, when hunter-gatherers venture into unfamiliar regions, it can take many generations to fully understand the local terrain, hunt smaller game, and identify edible plants. However, relying on large mammals alters this dynamic.

“Mammoths, for instance, were widespread, traversing vast territories,” stated Matt Uhler, a professor at the University of Alaska Fairbanks.

“In effect, expert hunter-gatherers utilized their knowledge of megaherbivores like mammoths to expand across continents faster than they would have if they had to learn about every local ecosystem.”

The researchers hypothesize that this specialization in hunting large herbivores may have significantly impacted ecological networks, contributing to the mass extinction of Ice Age megafauna as these cultures migrated southward.

Mammoths and horses vanished from Alaska around 13,300 years ago, coinciding with the earliest known human occupations.

In North America, Clovis-era megafauna disappeared by 12,800 years, while gomphotheres and giant ground sloths lingered in South America until approximately 11,600 years ago.

“This pattern of arrival, proliferation, and extinction may have repeated itself, each time progressing further south, making a compelling case for human hunting as the primary catalyst for megafauna extinctions, with climate change possibly exacerbating the situation,” Professor Potter concluded.

“Megaherbivores reproduce slowly, occupy expansive territories, and lack natural predators as adults.”

“They likely did not possess the learned wariness that technologically advanced hunter-gatherers exhibited.”

For more information, see the study published in the Journal on July 1, 2026, in Scientific Progress.

_____

Ben A. Potter et al. 2026. Hemispheric-scale evidence for early Paleoindian megaherbivore specialization. Scientific Progress 12(27); doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aef9628

Source: www.sci.news

30,000 Years Ago: A Toolkit Reveals the Contents of Ancient Hunters’ Pouches

Collection of Stone Tools from Milovice IV Archaeological Site

Martin Novak

The discovered series of stone tools in the Czech Republic appears to belong to hunter-gatherers who roamed the area roughly 30,000 years ago. Among the 29 artifacts, which include blades and points used for hunting, skinning, and cutting wood, researchers gain rare insights into the daily lives of ancient hunters, as noted by Dominik Chlachula from the Chekoa Academy of Sciences in Brno.

The investigation began in 2009 when a village road collapsed in the Pavlovskövurky Mountains, revealing an old cellar. By 2021, archaeologists uncovered a deeper site known as Mirovice IV, which yielded charcoal dating back approximately 29,550-30,550 years. Here, researchers found horse and reindeer bones, along with a collection of stone tools that seemed to have been preserved in leather pouches over time, although the material has since decayed.

The tools exhibited significant wear, according to Chlachula. Most blades showed signs of extensive cutting, while several had holes near the handle. Some points displayed fractures or microscopic damage, indicating their use as spear or arrow tips.

Certain pieces appear to have been repurposed from older tools, hinting at the scarcity of quality stones or indicating that hunters aimed to conserve their resources, he adds.

Further examinations revealed that around two-thirds of the tools were made from glacial sediment stones originating from at least 130 kilometers away in the north, a considerable distance, particularly when traversing winding routes. The remaining tools seemed to come from western Slovakia, roughly 100 kilometers southeast. It’s still uncertain whether the owner procured the stones directly or through trade networks.

Many of the artifacts were too damaged to be usable, Chlachula explains. Nevertheless, hunters may have chosen to keep them for their sentimental value.

Neanderthals, Ancient Humans, Cave Art: France

Join new scientist Kate Douglas as she embarks on an enchanting voyage through time, exploring significant Neanderthal and Upper Paleolithic sites across southern France, from Bordeaux to Montpellier.

Topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Hunters and gatherers tend to have shorter sleep durations compared to industrialized individuals.

Members of the Namibian HIMBA community get an average of 5.5 hours of sleep at night

Nick Fox/Aramie

Unlike our ancestors who lived in technologically advanced times, there is much written about how modern lifestyles mean that we no longer get enough sleep. However, an analysis of 54 sleep studies conducted around the world has shown that people in small, non-industrial societies actually sleep less than people in industrialized communities.

“Everyone I talk about in Canada and the US are talking about how bad their sleep is.” Leela Mackinnon At Toronto Mississauga University, Canada. “The numbers don’t show that.”

It is often assumed that the rise of gadgets like big screen televisions and smartphones means that people today are less sleepy than in the recent past.

However, many studies reporting sleep declines over the past few decades are based on asking people how long they spend sleep. This is an unreliable measure. Even using this method, The results are mixedmany studies have found that there is no change or even an increase in sleep duration.

Studies based on more reliable measurements, such as using physical activity monitors and electrodes to monitor brain waves, have not declined over the last few decades. For example, we found a 2016 review of 168 studies. There is no decline Sleep period for the past 50 years.

However, these studies have been conducted in developed countries and reveal the question of whether people had more sleep before industrialisation. Wrist-based activity monitors are now available, making it easier to study sleep in a non-industrial society.

Such studies have revealed an incredible short period of sleep. For example, among hunter-gatherers, Sun sleeps on average 6.7 hours per night, Hatza sleeps 6.2 hours, and Bayaka sleeps 5.9 hours per night. The shortest time ever found is 5.5 hours of sleep in the HIMBA community in Namibia, a herdsman of nomadic livestock.

McKinnon and her colleagues David SamsonUniversity of Toronto, University of Mississauga, is also involved in several such research. They now compare sleep habits in industrialized societies, including the US, Australia and Sri Lanka, with people from small, non-industrial communities, including the Amazon, Madagascar and the Pacific indigenous people.

Overall, the analysis is based on 54 studies that include direct measures of sleep in people over 18 years of age without serious health conditions. In total, only 866 people are involved in these studies, but the dataset is the most comprehensive to date, says Samson. “It’s the best now.”

Overall, these individuals slept on average 6.8 hours, while in non-industrial societies the average was 6.4 hours, while in industrial societies it was 7.1 hours.

The two also found that people from the industrial world were asleep for 74% of their time in bed.

McKinnon and Samson also evaluated the regularity of people’s circadian rhythms using a measure called the circadian function index, where the score of 1 is perfect. In non-industrialized communities, the average was 0.7 compared to 0.63 in industrial societies.

Samson attributes the higher period of sleep and increased sleep efficiency in industrialized societies to conditions that encourage sleep more. “We see that we have some real benefits from the safety and security of our sleep scene,” he says. “There’s no need to dodge the night or predators with rival human groups.”

Conversely, people in industrial areas are less exposed to clues that help to maintain a circadian rhythm, such as low night temperatures and bright daylight exposure. Although they did not appreciate this, both MacKinnon and Samson said that a low normal circadian rhythm would have a negative effect explaining why many people perceive their sleep as poor. I doubt there is a possibility of giving it.

What is not clear from the paper says that individuals in these 54 studies are representatives of the overall population. Nathaniel Marshall At Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia. “Special sampling is required to make a statement about epidemiological prevalence,” he says.

Samson said he looked into whether large sample sizes could change results, and concluded that there was no significant difference.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

New Study Seeks to Rewrite History by Highlighting Women as Hunters

A new study reveals that prehistoric women not only participated in hunting, but may have been physiologically suited for it. The study is based on physiological studies and archaeological evidence, highlighting women’s endurance and the lack of a strict division of labor in early societies. This study highlights the need to reevaluate long-standing prejudices about women’s abilities.

When Carla Okobock was a child, she often wondered about the images in movies, books, comics, and cartoons depicting prehistoric men and women. Accompanying her are a “man hunter” with a spear in his hand and a “female gatherer” with a spear. The baby was strapped to his back, and in his hand was a basket of crop seeds.

“This was something everyone was used to seeing,” Okobock said. “This is an assumption that we all had in our heads, and it was carried through at the Natural History Museum.”

Many years later, Ocobock, an assistant professor in the University of Notre Dame’s anthropology department and director of the Human Energetics Laboratory, realized that she was a human biologist, studying physiology and prehistoric evidence, and working with early women. I discovered that many of these notions about women are true. Men were less accurate. The accepted reconstruction of human evolution assumed that men were biologically superior, but that interpretation did not tell the whole story.

Source: scitechdaily.com