Experts Caution Against Earlier and Shorter Seasons

This autumn, New England’s renowned leaf spectacle may not extend as long as Leaf Peepers hope. Following a summer marked by drought and fluctuating rainfall, experts anticipate that colors will emerge early, shine brightly, and fade more quickly than usual.

Timing is not just essential for Instagram-worthy shots. Annually, millions flock to New York, Vermont, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Maine to hike, drive, and explore under the vibrant canopy, contributing an estimated $8 billion to the local economy, according to the US Forest Service.

However, this year, scientists say the iconic display is less predictable, with sporadic bursts of color replacing the usual weeks of vibrant waves of red, orange, and gold.

“Bright, Short, Early” season

Jim Salge, an autumn leaves predictor for Yankee magazine, forecasts the transition to be “bright, short, and fast.” Some leaves have already turned brown before showcasing their vibrant hues.

“Traditionally, we observe changes moving northward, inland, and in coastal areas, but as trees become stressed and change rapidly, we expect to see more patchwork patterns this year,” Sarji noted.

When trees do not receive adequate water, they become “stressed,” impairing the process of photosynthesis, which converts sunlight into energy. Conversely, excessive water can suffocate roots.

For optimal viewing, I suggest heading to the western parts of Maine, southern New Hampshire, and northern Massachusetts, as well as the White Mountains in Vermont.

Peak colors are expected to shift to Vermont, New Hampshire, and Western Maine by early October, with higher elevations predicted to peak about a week earlier than usual.

“The silver lining about New England is that if you miss it, you can always head further south,” he said. “If it’s too early, go north or ascend to the mountains.”

Travelers can keep track of leaf changes with tools like the Peak leaf map by Yankee Magazine and I Love New York’s weekly reports.

Why are the leaves changing?

Nonetheless, climate change has generally intensified over recent decades, and this year’s dry summer has accelerated the timeline.

“Ideally, our forests would benefit from a mild rain event evenly spread throughout the year,” explained Mukundrao, assistant professor at Columbia University’s Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory. “However, a series of extreme storms, followed by dry spells, makes it too rapid for the soil to absorb the water.”

Vibrant leaf colors thrive on warm days and cool nights, but stressful conditions for trees can hasten leaf drop. Stressed or unhealthy trees often exhibit shorter transitions and dull foliage, Rao mentioned. In contrast, urban trees typically retain color longer, as buildings and pavement hold heat while streetlights provide extra illumination.

Additional threats include fungal diseases from heavy spring rains and diseases affecting beech trees.

“We are witnessing invasive insects altering forests and decimating various tree species, alongside invasive plants disrupting native growth and patterns,” Sarji stated.

Tracking changes

To make predictions, Salge depends on weather forecasts and phenotype data, which involves tracking seasonal life cycles.

Notably, Polly’s Pancake Parlor in Sugar Hill, New Hampshire, has been monitoring local foliage since 1975. Records indicate that peak colors appeared for two weeks in late September that year; however, in 2024, it shifted to just two days in early October.

The US National Phenology Network gathers and shares observations from across the country. Its Nature’s Notebook app invites volunteers to document seasonal changes, bolstering over 200 scientific studies, according to director Theresa Crimmins.

“We have a general understanding of nature,” Crimmins remarked. “However, when focusing on specific species in particular locations, there remains much we do not comprehend.”

The revamped version of the app, launching this spring, allows users to upload photos for even one-time observations.

“More people can now become citizen scientists,” Sarji commented. “Their perspectives on the world contribute valuable data.”

Source: www.nbcnews.com

If TED Talks Get Shorter, What Does It Reveal About Our Attention Span?

Name: Ted Talks

Year: Ted was established in 1984.

And has Ted been sharing ideas ever since? Ted – an abbreviation for Technology, Entertainment, Design – is a non-profit media organization based in the U.S. that hosts its annual conference…

Yes, and they offer motivational online talks. With the powerful tagline “Ideas change everything.”

So, what about them? They are concise.

A lecture? Above all? Historically speaking.

How brief are they? Just 6 minutes.

Who do you refer to? That’s Elif Shafaq.

Turkish and British authors? She’s a novelist, essayist, public speaker, and activist. She spoke at the Hay Festival in Wales.

What did she say? When she first delivered a Ted Talk, she was allowed 19 minutes, but after a decade, the limit was reduced to a strict 13.

Why? That’s what she asked Ted.

And what did Ted reply? According to Shafaq, Ted responded:

How did that make her feel? “It’s disheartening. We can’t engage for more than a few minutes,” she noted, pointing out that we live “in the age of hyperinformation.”

Is it too much to handle? Exactly. “We’re unable to process so much information,” she added. “In the long run, we may lose compassion, leading to fatigue, decreased morale, and paralysis.”

My goodness, sounds severe. Is it true our attention spans have diminished? The absence of longitudinal studies means we can’t be certain, but the public appears to believe so.

Do tell me more. But let’s continue along that line. Research from King’s College London in 2022 found that 49% of individuals think their attention spans are decreasing, while 50% say they can’t stop checking their phones…

Probably young people. Not just them; it’s also a challenge for middle-aged individuals. Moreover, 50% believe the typical adult attention span today is merely 8 seconds.

Sorry, what were we discussing again? The short attention span.

Oh yes, I figured as much. But how about books? Are they getting shorter too? Interestingly, a 2015 survey suggested books are now 25% longer than they were 15 years ago.

I can relate, but something is changing. Nonetheless, this year’s longlist for the international booker prize features eight books with fewer than 200 pages.

What about movies? Surely they’re getting longer? The simple answer is: No. A slightly longer explanation: likely due to marketing strategies, as studios aim to increase ticket sales.

Wait, so it seems our attention is waning while films are getting longer? Very astute. Someone should address this in a Ted Talk.

Say: “Can I make a difference in just 13 minutes?”

Don’t say: “Hurry, you’re running out of time.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Hunters and gatherers tend to have shorter sleep durations compared to industrialized individuals.

Members of the Namibian HIMBA community get an average of 5.5 hours of sleep at night

Nick Fox/Aramie

Unlike our ancestors who lived in technologically advanced times, there is much written about how modern lifestyles mean that we no longer get enough sleep. However, an analysis of 54 sleep studies conducted around the world has shown that people in small, non-industrial societies actually sleep less than people in industrialized communities.

“Everyone I talk about in Canada and the US are talking about how bad their sleep is.” Leela Mackinnon At Toronto Mississauga University, Canada. “The numbers don’t show that.”

It is often assumed that the rise of gadgets like big screen televisions and smartphones means that people today are less sleepy than in the recent past.

However, many studies reporting sleep declines over the past few decades are based on asking people how long they spend sleep. This is an unreliable measure. Even using this method, The results are mixedmany studies have found that there is no change or even an increase in sleep duration.

Studies based on more reliable measurements, such as using physical activity monitors and electrodes to monitor brain waves, have not declined over the last few decades. For example, we found a 2016 review of 168 studies. There is no decline Sleep period for the past 50 years.

However, these studies have been conducted in developed countries and reveal the question of whether people had more sleep before industrialisation. Wrist-based activity monitors are now available, making it easier to study sleep in a non-industrial society.

Such studies have revealed an incredible short period of sleep. For example, among hunter-gatherers, Sun sleeps on average 6.7 hours per night, Hatza sleeps 6.2 hours, and Bayaka sleeps 5.9 hours per night. The shortest time ever found is 5.5 hours of sleep in the HIMBA community in Namibia, a herdsman of nomadic livestock.

McKinnon and her colleagues David SamsonUniversity of Toronto, University of Mississauga, is also involved in several such research. They now compare sleep habits in industrialized societies, including the US, Australia and Sri Lanka, with people from small, non-industrial communities, including the Amazon, Madagascar and the Pacific indigenous people.

Overall, the analysis is based on 54 studies that include direct measures of sleep in people over 18 years of age without serious health conditions. In total, only 866 people are involved in these studies, but the dataset is the most comprehensive to date, says Samson. “It’s the best now.”

Overall, these individuals slept on average 6.8 hours, while in non-industrial societies the average was 6.4 hours, while in industrial societies it was 7.1 hours.

The two also found that people from the industrial world were asleep for 74% of their time in bed.

McKinnon and Samson also evaluated the regularity of people’s circadian rhythms using a measure called the circadian function index, where the score of 1 is perfect. In non-industrialized communities, the average was 0.7 compared to 0.63 in industrial societies.

Samson attributes the higher period of sleep and increased sleep efficiency in industrialized societies to conditions that encourage sleep more. “We see that we have some real benefits from the safety and security of our sleep scene,” he says. “There’s no need to dodge the night or predators with rival human groups.”

Conversely, people in industrial areas are less exposed to clues that help to maintain a circadian rhythm, such as low night temperatures and bright daylight exposure. Although they did not appreciate this, both MacKinnon and Samson said that a low normal circadian rhythm would have a negative effect explaining why many people perceive their sleep as poor. I doubt there is a possibility of giving it.

What is not clear from the paper says that individuals in these 54 studies are representatives of the overall population. Nathaniel Marshall At Macquarie University in Sydney, Australia. “Special sampling is required to make a statement about epidemiological prevalence,” he says.

Samson said he looked into whether large sample sizes could change results, and concluded that there was no significant difference.

topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Can Natural Genetic Factors Lead to Having More Children in a Shorter Time?

Scientific Evidence Backs Antagonistic Pleiotropy Theory of Aging

Comprehensive studies have confirmed the antagonistic pleiotropy theory of aging, indicating a genetic correlation between high fertility and shortened lifespan. Nonetheless, environmental factors are highlighted as major influencers of modern human lifespan and reproductive behavior.

New research further supports the idea that genes promoting early reproduction can accelerate aging but emphasizes the overriding role of environmental factors in determining longevity and reproduction.

Originating in a 1957 theory proposed by evolutionary biologist George Williams, the antagonistic pleiotropy theory posits that genetic mutations favoring early reproduction could simultaneously contribute to aging, making life shorter.

The theory was tested in a new study led by the University of Michigan, involving over 276,000 individuals, reaffirming its validity. The researchers found distinct genome-wide evidence supporting the theory.

A novel breakthrough discovery showcased a strong negative genetic correlation between reproduction and longevity, suggesting that mutations promoting reproduction tend to shorten lifespan. However, this link is also influenced by environmental factors.

It was established that the number and timing of reproduction can impact lifespan. Remarkably, having two children was linked to the longest lifespan, according to this study, reinforcing previous research findings.

The concept of pleiotropy suggests that a single mutation can impact multiple traits, while antagonistic pleiotropy posits that mutations can be beneficial or harmful depending on various circumstances. The evolutionary basis of aging is seen through this lens.

In line with this, the study’s outcome points to significant environmental changes, such as lifestyle and technological advances, as opposed to genetic variants identified as drivers of human phenotypic changes.

Reference: “Evidence for the role of selection for reproductively advantageous alleles in human aging” by Erping Long and Jianzhi Zhang, December 8, 2023. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adh4990

Source: scitechdaily.com