British Union Claims Rockstar Games Fired Employees Attempting to Unionize

Rockstar Games, the developer of Grand Theft Auto, faces allegations of “blatant and callous union sabotage” after reportedly terminating over 30 employees whom it claimed were attempting to unionize.

The Independent Workers’ Union of Great Britain (IWGB), representing workers in the gaming sector, stated that a UK-based employee was dismissed last week for being part of the IWGB’s games union Discord channel. The workers believe they were targeted for this reason, and the union asserts that this dismissal was illegal and retaliatory.

The Guardian has reached out to Rockstar Games for a response. In a statement to Bloomberg, the company accused the dismissed employees of distributing confidential information in a “public forum,” arguing that “this does not affect anyone’s right to join a union or partake in union activities.”

The IWGB countered this claim, stating that the workers communicated solely through private and legally protected trade union channels, with no information being leaked publicly.

These layoffs occurred just before the launch of Grand Theft Auto VI. Analysts predict this launch will be the most significant in gaming history, expected to generate billions in revenue. Since its release in 2013, Grand Theft Auto V has generated $8.6 billion, according to the latest financial data from game publisher Take-Two.

On Thursday, the union staged protests outside the British headquarters of Rockstar Games’ parent company Take-Two Interactive in London and the developer’s Edinburgh office, Rockstar North. One protester held a sign that read “Grand Theft Hiring,” while another carried a placard saying “Is the Union Broken?” This refers to the “crushed” screen displayed when players are arrested in Grand Theft Auto.

The launch of Grand Theft Auto VI has been delayed once again and is now set for November 2026. Photo: Chris Delmas/AFP/Getty Images

IWGB organizer Fred Carter participated in the picket in Edinburgh. He shared with the BBC that he was there to support employees who had been dismissed “without warning” and “without reason.”

“We believe these dismissals were due to their trade union membership, which is a protected right in the UK,” he stated. “We urge people to support our cause, demand our jobs back, and hold Rockstar accountable.”

In a statement shared by the IWGB, Peter (a pseudonym) one of the terminated employees, remarked: “It’s uplifting to see so many colleagues rallying behind us and holding management accountable. Clearly, this is an instance of egregious union-busting. Rockstar employs numerous talented developers, all vital in creating the games we produce.”

IWGB Chairman Alex Marshall emphasized that Rockstar Games’ actions have led to a workplace where “hardworking staff are afraid to speak privately about their rights for a fairer workplace and collective voice.”

“Management has shown they are more concerned with union suppression than with the delays of GTA VI, by targeting those who contribute to the game’s creation. Recently, Rockstar has benefited from: [tens of millions] due to tax relief…” he added, noting that “only non-rock star employees participating in the union’s Discord channel were union organizers.”

In recent years, the video game industry has experienced a rise in unionization efforts to combat longstanding practices like “crunching” (extensive unpaid overtime). In 2018, Rockstar co-founder Dan Houser revealed that employees were “working 100 hours a week” in preparation for Red Dead Redemption 2, bringing scrutiny to the company’s employee treatment. At that time, Rockstar North’s Rob Nelson candidly stated: “We always strive to improve our working conditions and the balance of our output, and we will not cease our efforts toward improvement.”

On Thursday, the developer announced that Grand Theft Auto VI, initially set for release on May 26, has been rescheduled for late 2026. Development of the game, which has faced multiple postponements, continues with the support of the Edinburgh team.

Source: www.theguardian.com

European Union regulations on deforestation are causing chaos for coffee farmers in Ethiopia

African farmers who produce some of the world’s most respected coffee are scrambling to comply with the new European Union environmental regulations, which require that the origins of any shipping of beans be documented.

The new measures, which will come into effect at the end of this year, are designed to prevent deforestation driven by agriculture expansion. To comply, farmers need to provide geographical data to show that no coffee is being grown on land where forests have recently been cut down.

Producers are unable to lose access to the vast European markets since December 31st.

Europe consumes more coffee than any other country in the world, and experts say the new regulations, officially known as the EU deforestation regulations, are potentially powerful tools to promote sustainable agriculture and prevent deforestation.

But it also represents what we call the “green squeeze,” which places a heavy burden on millions of small farmers in developing countries that are least contributing to climate change, testing the ability of policymakers to balance people’s needs with natural needs.

“Of course, data is very important to us, but what we’re saying is that we need support,” said Degen Daddy, head of the Oromia Coffee Farmers Co-op. “It’s very challenging and expensive and there’s no help for us.”

Dadi said his group, Ethiopia’s largest cooperative of coffee growers, has more than half a million members based in the central part of the country and could not prepare all the farms by the deadline, possibly without additional support.

Trainers have been crossing the Oromia region for over a year, collecting map coordinates and assisting farmers with new technology. As of March, they were mapping 24,000 farms. European officials validate shipments by cross-checking current geographical allocation data against baseline satellite images and forest cover maps.

Daddy said the cost of mapping one farm is about $4.50. The cost of training is partially covered by grants from the International Trade Centre, a joint organisation of the United Nations and the World Trade Organization, established to help poor countries expand their trade.

Ethiopia is the top coffee producer in Africa, with crops accounting for around 35% of the country’s revenue. The Arabica variety is smooth and gentle with fruity, nutty notes, and comes from the country’s southwest highlands. Over a third of Ethiopian coffee is sent to Europe.

Last year’s French government report says EU consumption is liable 44% of coffee-related deforestation all over the world. Another report by the Environmental Group, World Resources Research Institute, found that there was about 2 million hectares of forest cover Replaced with a coffee farm Between 2001 and 2025. Indonesia, Brazil and Peru recorded some of the highest deforestation rates in that period.

The global leader pledged in 2021 at Glasgow Climate Summit to end deforestation by 20303. The agreement highlighted a growing awareness of nature’s role in tackling the climate crisis. The intact forests are natural reservoirs of carbon that warm the planets, keeping them away from the atmosphere. As carbon dioxide, trapping the heat of the sun increases global warming. Once the forest is cleared, these areas will switch to greenhouse gas emissions. Additionally, by destroying habitats, it harms the biodiversity of forests and its diversity.

The new EU regulations also cover cattle, cocoa, palm oil, rubber and other crops. Shipment of coffee without proper mapping data can be denied or confiscated and can be fined on the importer.

However, some experts say the measure is being implemented without the necessary support for farmers.

Jodie Keane, an economist at ODI Global, a London-based research organization, said the European Union and major coffee chains should do more to help smallholder farmers.

“We all want to prevent deforestation,” Keene said. “But when applying that standard to rural producers, you need to provide a lot of outreach, sensitization. You need to invest in learning how to do things differently so that they don’t drop them out of the supply chain.”

This was reflected by Etelle Higonet, founder of the watch group Coffee Watch. “These are some of the richest companies in the world,” she said of the European coffee chain. “Of course they could afford to do this.”

In an email, Johannes Dengler, managing partner of Alois Dallmayr, one of Germany’s most well-known coffee brands, confirmed that the new rules are a “big challenge” for Ethiopia. He said Dallmayr is developing a system to ensure compliance and is “working closely with his partners to find viable solutions.”

The Director-General of the European Union’s Trade and Economic Security did not respond to a request for comment. in News Release on April 15th Based on feedback from partner countries, the bloc said it allocated 86 million euros, or about $97 million, to support compliance efforts.

Ethiopian coffee farmers take pride in their high quality beans, as a result of exceptional heirloom varieties, highlands and traditional agricultural practices.

In southwestern Zinma Highlands, farmers like Zinabu Abadura say most growers follow long-standing unwritten rules for cutting trees.

Abadura, who sells directly to informal intermediaries, said his farm has not yet been mapped. Most farmers in his area generate coffee revenue and cannot afford to pay any confusion or additional costs. “Life will be difficult,” he said, as new European rules will be implemented.

However, the new EU standards can sort Ethiopia’s coffee sector, but analysts say they probably won’t stop selling.

Countries like China offer alternative, less isolated markets. And Ethiopia itself is a big coffee drinker. Hospitality is incomplete without a coffee ceremony hosting roasts, grinds and brews in front of guests. About half of the country’s annual coffee production stays at home.

But Tsegaye Anebo, who heads the Sidama Coffee Union, which represents 70,000 farmers, said the pivot to the new market would be disruptive in the short term. He said that the species of ferns in his area are distinctive in its fruity tone and are a favorite in wealthy Europe. And that means premium prices.

Giving up the EU market is not an option, he said.

“We need the EU,” Anebo said. “But they need us too, because they can’t find our coffee anywhere.”

Munira Abdelmenan contributed the report.

Source: www.nytimes.com

Former UK Amazon CEO as Competition Watchdog is a “Slap in the Face,” According to Labor Union

Trade unions and consumer activists have criticized the appointment of Amazon’s former chief executive as the head of Britain’s competition watchdog, calling it a “slap in the face to workers” and “Trumpian.” The government hired Doug Gurr, former Amazon UK and China boss, to chair the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), leading to accusations of favoritism towards big tech.

Business Secretary Justin Madders defended the decision, stating that it was aimed at boosting economic growth. Gurr replaces Markus Bockelink and will serve as interim chair for up to 18 months. The CMA will focus on investigating technology companies under the new digital market competition regime to increase competition.

Critics like GMB national secretary Andy Prendergast and campaigner Rob Harrison have raised concerns about Gurr’s ties to Amazon and the potential bias in regulating technology monopolies. However, government officials maintain that the CMA will uphold its operational independence and protect consumer interests.

Amazon, known for its dominance in online sales, has faced criticism for its treatment of workers and market practices. The company has pledged to ensure worker rights and dignity. The appointment of Gurr has sparked debates over conflict of interest and regulatory oversight of tech giants like Amazon, Google, and Facebook.

Antitrust watchdogs and consumer groups have expressed concerns about the impact of Gurr’s appointment on economic growth and innovation. The Open Market Institute (OMI) criticized the move as a strategic failure that could harm UK’s competitiveness in the tech sector.

Despite the backlash, government officials defend the decision, stating that it is necessary to balance consumer protection and growth. Gurr’s background as an Amazon executive has raised questions about his ability to regulate the tech industry effectively.

Gurr’s appointment comes after disagreements over the CMA’s approach to growth, leading to the replacement of Bockelink. Regulators like Nikhil Rati of the Financial Conduct Authority have emphasized that they are acting on government directives to ensure compliance and customer protection.

The CMA and Gurr have been approached for comment on the matter. Additional reporting by Kalyeena Makortoff and Sarah Butler.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Arrest of Telegram co-founder intensifies stakes for European Union

The unexpected arrest of Pavel Durov, the co-founder of Telegram and a native of Russia, upon arriving in Paris from a private jet last Saturday night, has brought the previously overlooked social network into the limelight like never before.

Durov’s arrest, following an investigation by the Paris prosecutor’s office into organized crime, child sexual abuse imagery, fraud, and money laundering on the platform, also raises the stakes for the European Union, which has implemented some of the most ambitious internet regulations in the world, notably the Digital Services Act (DSA). The DSA, set to take effect in November 2022, aims to govern online platforms that, in the words of EU Commissioner Thierry Breton, are “too large to manage,” requiring them to remove illegal content, safeguard children, and combat misinformation and other online harms.

The European Commission has distanced itself from the French investigation of Durov. A spokesperson stated, “This is solely a national criminal investigation conducted by French authorities in accordance with French criminal law.” They added, “It is unrelated to the DSA.”

The allegations against the 39-year-old tech magnate have intensified pressure on the European Commission and Belgium, the member state responsible for regulating Telegram on behalf of the EU. Jan Penfrat of the European Digital Rights Group (EDRi) questioned, “If content moderation is such a significant problem that it leads to criminal cases, why hasn’t the DSA addressed it yet?”

Telegram, a hybrid messaging service and social network with around 200,000 users, has been a cause for concern among European officials for some time. Despite attracting nearly a billion users worldwide, the service now faces stricter regulations under European law, despite having only 41 million monthly active users in the EU.

Enforcement of the law may face challenges, as some EU member states, including Belgium, are facing legal action for not appointing the Digital Services Coordinator, the entity responsible for implementing the DSA. Belgium has tasked the enforcement of the DSA to an organization that lacks the authority to investigate Telegram.

EU officials doubt Telegram’s assertion that its 41 million monthly active EU users place it just below the threshold for the strictest regulations. European Commission Vice-President Vera Jourova expressed concerns over Telegram’s impact in certain member states.

The European Commission is reviewing Telegram’s user data to determine if it meets the criteria to be recognized as a “very large online platform.” Discussions between the Commission and Telegram are ongoing, with the platform required to publish its latest monthly user data by the end of the month.

Activists emphasize the importance of transparency from Telegram. EDRi’s Penfrat stated, “An online platform with such a significant user base should operate with more transparency, even if it is not officially considered a VLOP (very large online platform).”

“The public and regulators need to be informed about the platform’s operations,” Penfrat emphasized.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Amazon warehouse workers in Coventry narrowly miss out on union recognition in voting process

The TUC is determined to continue the fight for union recognition at Amazon despite workers at the US retailer’s Coventry warehouse being denied collective bargaining rights by a narrow margin of 29 votes.

In a significant vote that could have compelled Amazon to allow trade unions in the UK for the first time, 50.5% of the voting workers chose to reject GMB union representation, a result that could have been overturned if just 15 people had switched sides.

General secretary of the TUC, Paul Nowak, stated, “Amazon is actively working to prevent workers from having an independent voice at their workplace. This is not the end – our movement remains united to expose bad employers.”

According to union sources, Amazon had instilled a culture of fear and used intimidation tactics to suppress support among the 3,000 workers at the West Midlands site during the over a year-long battle for recognition.

GMB activists were permitted to present their case to workers in a timed meeting before the vote, while managers conducted separate information sessions to argue against approval.

GMB senior organizer Stuart Richards mentioned that the union would explore legal avenues. He added, “Amazon has been relentless in its attacks on its own employees. Workers have been subjected to pressure to attend lengthy anti-union seminars.”

Workers were granted the right to a binding vote by an independent Central Arbitration Committee in April after a GMB campaign, as Amazon had initially refused voluntary recognition. The voting process had oversight from independent advisers appointed by the CAC.

Had employees voted in favor of recognition, GMB would have had the authority to negotiate pay and working conditions on their behalf, marking the first time Amazon would have recognized a trade union in the UK.

Additionally, it would have been the first instance of employees of an internet retailer receiving recognition rights outside the US.

Mr. Richards expressed concerns about Amazon’s conduct and reiterated the ongoing determination of workers to seek justice.

“Although Amazon’s anti-union stance prevailed in this instance, the underlying issues around work intensity and pay that sparked this dispute remain unresolved,” noted Callum Kant, a senior lecturer at the University of Essex who studies the gig economy.

Under current regulations, a union cannot reapply for recognition for the same group of workers for three years after losing a vote. The government has indicated plans to ease the process of securing recognition as part of its new worker-friendly policies, though the impact on cases like Amazon’s remains uncertain.

Amazon responded, stating, “We appreciate all those who participated in this vote. At Amazon, we prioritize direct engagement and regular conversations with our employees. We value these relationships and strive to offer career growth opportunities in a safe environment with competitive pay and benefits.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Federal police union advocates for creation of portal for reporting AI deepfake victimization

The federal police union is calling for the establishment of a dedicated portal where victims of AI deepfakes can report incidents to the police. They expressed concern over the pressure on police to quickly prosecute the first person charged last year for distributing deepfake images of women.

Attorney General Mark Dreyfus introduced legislation in June to criminalize the sharing of sexually explicit images created using artificial intelligence without consent. The Australian Federal Police Association (Afpa) supports this bill, citing challenges in enforcing current laws.

Afpa highlighted a specific case where a man was arrested for distributing deepfake images to schools and sports associations in Brisbane. They emphasized the complexities of investigating deepfakes, as identifying perpetrators and victims can be challenging.

Afpa raised concerns about the limitations of pursuing civil action against deepfake creators, citing the high costs and challenges in identifying the individuals responsible for distributing the images.

They also noted the difficulty in determining the origins of deepfake images and emphasized the need for law enforcement to have better resources and legislation to address this issue.

Skip Newsletter Promotions

The federal police union emphasized the need for better resources and legislation to address the challenges posed by deepfake technology, urging for an overhaul of reporting mechanisms and an educational campaign to raise awareness about this issue.

The committee is set to convene its first hearing on the proposed legislation in the coming week.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Amazon Workers in UK Warehouses Vote for Union Recognition: A Groundbreaking Moment

Located on a traffic island on the outskirts of Coventry, a small yet dynamic organizing team from the GMB union is challenging Amazon with homemade signs and orange bucket hats.

In a historic vote last week, over 3,000 Amazon workers were given the opportunity to participate in a vote that could potentially lead to the company recognizing a trade union in the U.K. for the first time. This is part of a series of battles worldwide over union recognition at the retail-to-cloud conglomerate founded by Jeff Bezos in 1994, now valued at over $2 trillion.

If successful, the GMB victory would grant workers the right to negotiate with Amazon on matters such as wages, hours, and holidays, something the famously anti-union company opposes. GMB also believes that recognition would give them an advantage in addressing health and safety concerns within the expansive Coventry warehouse, known as BHX4.

The ongoing campaign at BHX4 sheds light on the barriers unions face, despite promises from the new Labour government to bolster trade union influence.

Results of the vote, held after a month-long process, are expected on Monday. Workers have received support from local Labour Party MP Taiwo Owateme, who commended their efforts.


Kate Gorton, GMB member, union To raise awareness about voting, snacks, drinks and gifts were distributed to employees at the end of each shift. Photo: Fabio De Paola/Observer

At the approach to BHX4, a dedicated GMB team welcomes workers as they arrive for the night shift amidst the sounds of dhol drummers creating a festive atmosphere.

These workers are encouraged to vote “Yes!” and many show support by honking or signaling approval from their vehicles. The campaign aims to bring positive change to the work environment at BHX4.

Meanwhile, GMB activists at another entrance offer refreshments and free hats to workers, urging them to vote in favor of recognition.

Despite some workers bypassing the activists, many engage in conversation, accept hats and drinks, and express their support for GMB.

The GMB’s current push for full authorization is their second attempt after withdrawing the initial application last year, citing Amazon’s strategic hiring practices to influence the outcome.

As the vote results await, GMB and other trade unions remain hopeful for meaningful changes under Labour’s New Deal for Workers, advocating for stronger collective bargaining and workers’ rights.

Amidst Amazon’s resistance to unions globally, the Coventry activists persevere, optimistic that they can achieve historic recognition. The company maintains that employees have the choice to join a union and emphasizes its commitment to direct engagement with employees.

Source: www.theguardian.com

First union recognition vote begins for Amazon UK employees

GMB officials recently visited Amazon UK’s Coventry site, initiating a month-long balloting process that brings workers closer to gaining union recognition for the first time.

This move follows Amazon’s rejection of voluntary recognition, leading to an independent central arbitration panel granting GMB the right to hold a legally binding vote.

If employees vote in favor of recognition, GMB will represent them in negotiations regarding pay and working conditions, a historic first for Amazon in the UK.

Over 2,000 employees will participate in meetings with union representatives and company officials, presenting their cases starting Wednesday. The voting process will take place in workplaces from July 8th, with results announced after July 15th.

Amanda Gearing, senior GMB organiser, noted Amazon’s resistance to unionization efforts but highlighted the determination of Coventry workers to improve their conditions.

The ongoing struggle includes union members in Coventry facing challenges like QR codes revoking their union membership and strikes demanding higher wages and a seat at the negotiation table.

Black Friday actions last year saw union members from the US and Europe supporting Coventry workers, showcasing international solidarity in the fight for workers’ rights.

GMB’s success at Amazon’s New York site serves as a model for Coventry workers as they strive for recognition and fair representation.

The GMB aims to secure a majority vote in favor of recognition with at least 40% of frontline workers supporting the decision.

Skip Newsletter Promotions

The Labour Party’s commitment to empowering trade unions reflects a broader push for worker rights and representation.

The TUC’s general secretary, Paul Nowak, emphasized the importance of workers securing better pay and conditions through unionization, countering Amazon’s anti-union tactics.

In response, an Amazon spokesperson highlighted the company’s minimum wage increase and emphasized employees’ choice in joining a union.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Amazon’s Tactics to Combat Union Efforts: Exposing the Lawbreakers

Amazon is facing an anti-government campaign that could lead to increased unionization among its employees, with allegations of unethical behavior surfacing. Workers attempting to organize within the warehouse have reported instances of fear tactics, misinformation, and unlawful retaliation by the tech giant.


Nearly two years ago, workers in Staten Island, New York, made history by forming America’s first warehouse union. As the Amazon union gathered momentum nationwide, the company worked to avoid a similar outcome at other locations.

Nanette Plasencia, a long-time employee at Amazon’s ONT8 fulfillment center in Moreno Valley, California, expressed concerns about the company’s tactics. She mentioned that Amazon is willing to go to great lengths, even if it means breaking the law, to prevent unionization.

Documentation shared with the Guardian revealed how Amazon pushed back against union efforts within ONT8 by disseminating anti-union messages. Employees were subjected to propaganda on TV screens warning them about the negative impact of unions on their paychecks.

These actions have led to allegations of unfair labor practices against Amazon, with the unionization process at the company facing legal challenges from both sides. The situation is currently pending a lawsuit and verdict from the National Labor Relations Board.

Despite facing opposition from the company, Amazon workers in Moreno Valley attempted to hold a union vote in October 2022. However, the election petition was withdrawn following alleged violations of labor laws by Amazon administrators.

The case is set to be heard by an administrative law judge in August, with Amazon denying any wrongdoing at ONT8. They have dismissed the majority of the charges brought against them and are eager to prove their innocence as the legal proceedings unfold.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Will other US companies follow Starbucks’ lead in making major progress in union negotiations?

Starbucks has been actively resisting unionization efforts for over two years, but now they seem willing to engage in negotiations.

In a surprising move, Starbucks and its union released a joint announcement at the end of February, expressing a willingness to make progress on organizing and collective bargaining.

The union representing Starbucks employees announced plans to resume direct negotiations with the company in late April to establish a basic framework agreement involving over 400 unionized stores.

This development has brought hope not only to Starbucks employees but also to workers at companies like Amazon, Trader Joe’s, and REI, who have been struggling to move contract negotiations forward.

The possibility of Starbucks potentially unionizing after years of aggressive anti-union tactics has sparked curiosity about which company may follow suit in the future.

Claire Chan, an REI employee, expressed excitement about the progress, highlighting the persistence required to bring a company like Starbucks to the negotiating table. She described it as a significant step forward.

John Logan, a labor studies professor, remains cautious about Starbucks’ intentions and whether they will truly commit to ending anti-union practices and reaching an initial contract.

The union representative for Starbucks, Michelle Eisen, remains optimistic about the future collaboration between Starbucks and the union, emphasizing the importance of valuing employee input for business success.

Starbucks has offered a settlement to the union following backlash over union-busting allegations, stock price declines, and disruptive strikes, showing a potential shift towards supporting unions.

Legal experts and union representatives see Starbucks’ possible unionization as a significant step that could inspire other companies to consider similar actions.

Overall, the announcement from Starbucks has far-reaching implications for workers’ rights and the future of unionization in major corporations.

Source: www.theguardian.com