Alex Garland’s ‘The Bone Temple’ Review: A Brutal and Surprising Sequel to ’28 Days Later’

Explore science news and in-depth articles on technology, health, and environment with New Scientist.

Ralph Fiennes’ Role in “28 Years Later: The Bone Temple”

Sony Pictures

It’s hard to overstate the impact of 28 Days Later. This groundbreaking 2002 film features Jim the Courier (Cillian Murphy), who awakens from a coma to find Britain devastated by an “angry virus,” a precursor to the past two decades of zombie media. The film serves as a stark reflection of societal decay and chaos.

A new trilogy could have easily followed the original formula, but in 2025, 28 Years Later shatters that mold. Set decades after the initial outbreak, this film revitalizes the series by focusing on Spike (Alfie Williams), a young boy navigating life on a virus-free island amid the ruins of Britain. His journey introduces new species of the infected and intelligent ‘alphas’ like Samson (Chee-Lewis Parry), who exhibit strategic thinking.

The second installment, Bone Temple, written by Alex Garland and directed by Nia DaCosta, shifts its focus to “the Jimmys,” a gang of youth captivated by bloodsports rather than the infected. These characters are stripped of their identities, led by the enigmatic Sir Lord Jimmy Crystal (Jack O’Connell), who dubs them all “Fingers.”

As the story unfolds, the Jimmy family’s troubling regression poses a menace to Spike as well. The harrowing first scene of Bone Temple sees Spike fighting for survival against Jimmy, marking a pivotal moment where an uninfected individual is killed, initially highlighting a crucial distinction.

This film challenges our understanding of the infected. We meet Ian Kelson (Ralph Fiennes), a retired physician and Spike’s ally, who attempts to understand these new beings. He once used morphine to subdue Samson but finds the alpha craves the drug, establishing a reluctant bond between them.

Through shared experiences, Kelson—an anthropologist at heart—investigates the cultural remnants of humanity by creating monuments and reclaiming narratives from desolate towns. His quest prompts profound questions about the consciousness of the infected. “What if you could speak?” he muses. “Do you have memories? Are you evolving?”

As Bone Temple invites us to reconsider the nature of evolution, we ponder whether beings like Samson symbolize a new paradigm. Are they regaining their humanity or transitioning into something uniquely different? As the story progresses, we ask if a cure is possible for these once-infected beings, and whether the lines between human and infected remain clear after decades.

Kelson’s psychological exploration yields unexpected revelations. Upon encountering Jimmy and his gang, he discovers a potential path to healing for the remnants of humanity—infected or otherwise. The profound message of this riveting film is that our understanding of the infected must evolve. As we follow Spike’s journey through this dystopian world, it begs the question: could the infected become humanity’s saviors? With the trilogy’s finale on the horizon, anticipation builds for what lies ahead.

Topics:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Australian Filmmaker Alex Ploya: “The Film Industry is Broken and Needs Reconstruction—AI Can Assist”

As capitalist forces largely steer advancements in artificial intelligence, Alex Proyas perceives the integration of AI in filmmaking as a pathway to artistic freedom.

While numerous individuals in the film industry view the rise of AI as a threat to their jobs, incomes, and likenesses, Australian filmmakers, including Proyas, embrace the technology as a means to simplify and reduce costs associated with projects.

“The model for filmmakers, the only person I truly care about at the end of the day, is broken… and it’s not AI that’s causing it,” Proyas states to the Guardian.

“It’s the industry, it’s streaming.”


He mentions that the filmmakers he once depended on are dwindling in the streaming era, with the remaining ones working on tighter budgets for projects.

“We need to reconstruct it from the ground up. We believe that AI will assist us in doing that because as it continually lowers production costs, we can retain more ownership of our projects,” he remarks.

Proyas’s upcoming film, Rur, narrates the tale of a woman attempting to liberate her robots from capitalist oppression within an island factory. Based on a satirical play from 1920, the film features Samantha Orle, Lindsay Faris, and Anthony Laparia, having begun filming in October of the previous year.

The Heresy Foundation, one of Proyas’s ventures, was established in 2020 in Alexandria, Sydney. I detailed that at the time as a comprehensive production house for films. He claims that Rur can be produced for a fraction of the US$100 million budget typical of traditional studios.

This cost-effectiveness is due to the capability of carrying out much of the work directly in the studio via virtual production in collaboration with Technology Giant Dell, which supplies workstations to facilitate real-time generation of AI assets during film creation.

Proyas’ 2004 film I, Robot, was created when AI was more firmly entrenched in the sci-fi genre. Photo: 20th Century Fox/Sports Photo/All Star

Proyas asserts that production durations for environmental designs can be shortened from six months to eight weeks.

His 2004 film, I, Robot, was produced during a time when AI was reasonably established in science fiction, yet depicted a world in 2035. When questioned about his concerns regarding AI’s implications in film production, especially in visual effects, Proyas responds, “The workforce is streamlined,” yet believes retraining is possible.

“I believe there’s a role for everyone who embraces technology and pushes it forward, just as we’ve done throughout the film industry,” he comments.

The Guardian interviewed Proyas during the same week when the Australian Productivity Committee was discharged from the creative sector to spark discussions on whether AI companies should have unrestricted access to everyone’s creative works for model training.

Proyas argues that in the “analog world,” there is no need for AI to plagiarize.


“I think of AI as ‘enhancing intelligence’ rather than artificial intelligence. It aids in streamlining processes, promoting efficiency, and enhancing productivity,” he explains.

“A human team will always be necessary. We view AI as one of our collaborative partners.”

Amidst a plethora of AI-generated content online, Proyas reveals that he has spent years honing his skills to achieve the desired outcomes from AI, striving to refine its output until he is content with it.

“My role as a director, creator, and visual artist hasn’t changed at all. I’m now collaborating with a smaller team of humans, with AI as my co-collaborator to realize my vision. And I am clear about what that vision is,” he states.

“I don’t just sit at my computer asking for ‘Funny cat videos, please.’ I am very precise.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Alex Cultivates His Latest Novel.

“The faster the planet, the more intense the storms…”

Elementix / Alamy stock photos

Last month, Earth witnessed some of its shortest recorded days. The planet spun rapidly enough to shave 1.4 milliseconds off the usual 24 hours. These natural accelerations of Earth’s rotation are often imperceptible. Yet, if you’re like me, the sensation that our world is increasingly chaotic—at least metaphorically—may feel familiar.

In my debut novel circular motion, I explore what occurs when Earth’s rotation accelerates not just by milliseconds, but by a minute, an hour, or even 12 hours. What happens when our planet begins to spin at an astonishing speed?

The sunrise unfolds as we imagine it. How many of us already feel pressed for time in a single day? In circular motion, the characters find themselves overstretched as the days grow shorter, struggling against the demands of their daily lives. Their rush only deepens the issue, relying on rapid global transport systems, responsible for the planet’s acceleration within the narrative. (Cyclical themes often appear in fiction.)

However, when the planet accelerates sufficiently, scheduling mishaps become the least of the characters’ worries. The spin of Earth impacts numerous facets of life. For instance, it governs the movement of liquid metals within the Earth and fortifies the planet’s magnetic field. Altered spins could disrupt everything from animal migration patterns to the visibility of the auroras. Ultimately, I had to select which effects to portray in the book for literary significance, including whimsical ones (like animals wandering off).

Upon discovering that cyclones would increase, I noted striking parallels—both with the “circle” motifs in my book and the genuine climate crisis presented in circular motion. Cyclones (along with hurricanes and typhoons) depend on the “Coriolis effect,” wherein air and water are deflected from the quickly spinning equator towards the slower-spinning poles. This phenomenon results in counterclockwise storms in the Northern Hemisphere and clockwise ones in the Southern Hemisphere. The faster the planet spins, the more intense the storms become.

Yet the aspect I felt most compelled to illustrate—the most vivid and striking manifestation of modern-day dizziness and disorientation—was the effect of planetary spin on gravity.

As the Earth rotates and we spin with it, centripetal forces keep us grounded. Without this force, we would be flung into space (albeit slowly), like a hammer released during an athletic throw, or like glasses sliding off your face if you spin too quickly. While my glasses may be fitting a bit too loosely, thankfully our position on Earth remains stable. What anchors us is gravity. However, with increased rotation, gravity effectively diminishes (so to speak), making us feel lighter. I was both thrilled and a bit apprehensive, learning that Earth’s rotation makes us feel about 1% lighter than if the planet stood still. At the equator, where you’re moving fastest around Earth’s axis, the circle you trace is widest.

Further from the equator, this phenomenon is less pronounced, but it’s undoubtedly odd. The direction of gravity (which pulls towards the center of the Earth) doesn’t align with the circular path you’re taking (around Earth’s axis). Consequently, Earth’s rotation not only weakens gravity but also creates the sensation of it being tilted.

As a novelist, I was dedicated to envisioning how this would feel at increased speeds. We calculated the strength and direction of what the book’s characters term “gravity loss” in London, California, and the Caribbean. Where does a ball come to a stop when rolling on this tilted landscape? What does the Beijing skyline appear like if it tilts 7 degrees away? If the land is slanted, is it akin to viewing a decline? (Not precisely!) Is it indeed 7 degrees? (Kind of!) Progressively, the world in circular motion transforms into a more topsy-turvy place.

However, the central question the book presents is how one feels a sense of belonging in such a world. In circular motion, the characters’ lives remain largely undisturbed by Earth’s acceleration. It’s not their relationships, career paths, faith, or sense of self that are impacted. They pursue love and meaning, feeling unmoored, askew, and spiraling through contemporary existence. Indeed, we grapple with that too.

Alex Foster circular motion (Grove Press) The latest selections from the New Scientist Book Club. Join us and read along here.

Source: www.newscientist.com

From Rough Sleeper to Viral Prankster: The Journey of Alex Warren’s Pop and Rock Sensation

a
T 18, Alex Warren found himself homeless in Carlsbad, California. He resorted to sneaking into a local gym for showers and toilet singing while preparing for job interviews and filming Tiktok videos. Fast forward six years later, and he is now a rising star in the world of pop music. His bold ballads have topped the UK charts for five consecutive weeks, making him the longest-running chart-topper of the year. Last week, he cracked the top ten in the US. Upon hearing the final version of his hit, he expressed his excitement, stating that he and his wife listened to it repeatedly during their entire drive home.

Despite potentially being a breakout hit, Warren was already quite famous. He gained recognition on social media by creating viral content, particularly with teenagers. In 2019, he filed a lawsuit against fellow content creators, including D’Amelio Sisters and Addison Rae, for their controversial internet videos during the Covid era, resulting in a hefty settlement. Additionally, he was a star on Netflix’s Hype House Show, where he went to great lengths to film prank videos, even staging a fake wedding with his real wife, influencer Kouvr Annon.

Warren has since transitioned to a more positive lifestyle, settling in Tennessee with Annon and embracing a new chapter in his life. Reflecting on his upbringing in a financially strained and abusive environment, Warren has found solace in his music, creating songs that resonate with his own struggles and hopes to provide comfort and inspiration to his fans.

Despite facing adversity and skepticism, Warren remains determined to share his music with the world. With a supportive team behind him, he aims to diversify his projects and connect with fans on a deeper emotional level. Through his music, Warren hopes to make a positive impact and spread messages of love and resilience.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Elon Musk reinstates Alex Jones and Infowars on X platform following user poll

Elon Musk has restored the X account of conspiracy theorist Alex Jones and his media site Infowars. Jones and his Infowars X account were “permanently banned” from Twitter by his former management in 2018 for posting abusive content and violating the platform’s rules.

On December 9th, Musk ran a user survey on X asking whether it would be appropriate to bring Alex Jones back to the platform. Nearly 2 million people voted, and about 70% said Jones’ account should be restored. Hours after the poll closed, the company reactivated Jones’ account. Infowars accounts had also been restored at the time of publication.

After posting the poll, Musk agreed with users who argued that a permanent ban on his account would be “against free speech.” “It’s hard to agree with this,” Musk said.

When a user raised concerns about misinformation circulating on the platform as a result of restoring Jones’ account, Musk pointed to a community note that said parts of the program “need to be fixed.” We will respond promptly to AJ’s post.”

Jones is notorious for spreading conspiracies surrounding the 2012 Sandy Hook school shooting, which killed 28 people. The conspiracy theorist was charged and had to appear in court claiming the shooting was staged.a court in connecticut ordered Jones pays $1.5 billion in damages last year.

Musk’s move comes as X struggles to retain the biggest advertisers on its platform. Prominent companies including Apple, Disney and IBM stopped advertising spending on social networks after Musk called anti-Semitic theories “actual truth.”

He later clarified and apologized for his comments, calling them “stupid.” But Tesla’s CEO wasn’t happy with people opting out of advertising on X. In a conversation with journalist Andrew Ross Sorkin at the DealBook conference, Tesla’s CEO told advertisers to “fuck off already.”

“If someone’s going to blackmail me with an ad, blackmail me with money? Fuck it,” Musk said. “Go. Shit. Yourself. Is it obvious?

He also mentioned Disney’s Bog Iger, who also spoke at the conference. In the same interview, Musk said the advertising boycott was going to “crush the company” and that those who conducted the boycott would be responsible for the company’s eventual demise.

Restoring Jones and Infowars’ accounts could raise further eyebrows and frustrate advertisers and others who monitor hate speech. In response to users, the owner of X acknowledged that while the repair could be financially detrimental to the platform, “principle is more important than money.”

After Musk took over X, he reinstated a number of controversial figures, including singer Kanye West, former US president Donald Trump, far-right influencer Andrew Tate, and right-wing scholar Jordan Peterson. I’ve let it happen.

Source: techcrunch.com