Tag Archives: user

Big Tech Promises User Protection Amid Spyware Firms’ Rise in Trump Administration

Posted on by
Reply

Apple and WhatsApp have committed to continue alerting users if their devices are targeted by government hacking software, particularly in the United States, as two spyware companies aim to penetrate the Trump administration.

The two tech giants provided statements in response to questions from the Guardian, as two Israeli-founded cyber weapon manufacturers, now under U.S. ownership, aggressively seek access to the American market.

Paragon Solutions, known for its spyware called Graphite, has already reached an agreement with the Trump administration to provide U.S. immigration officials with one of the most advanced hacking tools globally as of September, following the unfreezing of a $2 million contract by the Department of Homeland Affairs with ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement).

Paragon did not reply to requests for comment.

NSO Group, another firm cited by the Biden administration in 2021 for conducting business “that goes against the national security or foreign policy interests of the United States,” revealed over the weekend that David Friedman, former U.S. ambassador to Israel during Donald Trump’s initial term, will become executive chairman of the parent company that owns NSO. The company has reportedly been recently acquired by new investors, including American film producer Robert Simmons.

Both Paragon and NSO Group develop spyware capable of infiltrating any phone without the knowledge of the user, enabling the spyware operator to read texts, eavesdrop on calls, track locations, and turn mobile devices into wiretapping tools or remote cameras.

While both companies defend their products as tools to combat serious crimes and thwart potential terrorist activities, their software is also weaponized by government clients to spy on individuals they wish to monitor covertly, including journalists, business leaders, and human rights advocates.

Apple and WhatsApp have consistently opposed the proliferation of spyware worldwide, notifying users via alerts when potential hacking attempts are detected in various countries, including Italy, Spain, and India.

In October, a U.S. court ruled in favor of WhatsApp after six years of legal battles, preventing NSO from targeting WhatsApp users in the future.

However, concerns arise due to the close connections between Apple, WhatsApp’s parent company Meta, and the Trump administration regarding whether they will persist in warning users amid such spyware threats in the United States.

“Threat notifications are intended to individually inform and assist users who may be victims of mercenary spyware, irrespective of geographic location,” Apple stated.

“WhatsApp aims to safeguard our users by disrupting hacking attempts from mercenary spyware, advancing protective measures, and notifying those whose devices are under threat, no matter where they are globally,” commented a WhatsApp representative.

Former FBI Director Christopher Wray testified that the FBI considered utilizing NSO’s Pegasus but ultimately declined to incorporate commercial spyware into its operations. Experts express concern over the legality surrounding the use of spyware in the United States, given existing laws that restrict targeted surveillance of Americans.

An aide to Democratic Senator Ron Wyden, a member of the Select Committee on Intelligence, mentioned that current immigration officials provided a preliminary briefing to his office, stating that “the policy is still under development,” but there has been no feedback since the government shutdown began in October.

When asked about the potential lifting of sanctions imposed on NSO by the Biden administration in 2021, Friedman mentioned during a phone call from Israel that he has yet to discuss the matter with President Trump, stating, “I hope that happens, but I have not made that request yet.” He added it is “too early to determine” when NSO may pursue the removal of these sanctions.

Regarding mercenary spyware, John Scott Railton, a senior research fellow at the University of Toronto’s Citizen Research Institute, warns that “no one is safe.” He is recognized as a leading authority on tracking and disrupting spyware usage against civil society members globally.

“American firms are unprepared to detect and defend against this type of menace domestically, similarly to healthcare institutions, legal professionals, politicians, and the general populace,” he noted. “The last thing America needs now is a silent spyware epidemic.”

Paragon initially signed a contract with ICE in 2024 under the Biden administration. The relatively small agreement went unnoticed by the White House until its official announcement, several insiders disclosed. Wired reported. The contract was subsequently suspended to ascertain whether it complied with a significant executive order issued earlier. Signed by the White House in May 2023, it prohibited the operational use of spyware that “poses a risk to national security or has been exploited by foreign entities for human rights violations globally.”

At that point, Paragon was free from surveillance controversies, unlike NSO Group, which faced scrutiny for its Pegasus spyware targeting a plethora of civil society organizations.

However, the situation shifted in January 2025 when WhatsApp disclosed that 90 individuals, including journalists and civil society members, had been targeted by Paragon’s Graphite.

Following this revelation, Paragon severed its ties with the Italian government, alleging that Italy violated its service terms by using spyware against civil society members.

Since then, media accounts have detailed how several Italian journalists, at least two executives from Italy’s largest bank, an Italian human rights advocate, and an Italian political strategist were targeted by hacking spyware in 2024.

The current government led by Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni has admitted that the software was employed against certain activists by Italian agencies with legal authority, but has not accepted responsibility for other prominent targets.

“This is Italy’s Watergate,” remarked former Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi in an interview.

“This is a tool that only governments can wield. If the Italian government continues to deny its usage, the question for multiple Italian business leaders and journalists remains, who is responsible?” he said. “I may not be closely aligned with journalists, but freedom of the press is essential in a free democracy. Using this tool against journalists is intolerable.”

Some officials are worried that this Graphite may now be under the control of U.S. immigration authorities.

“ICE is already undermining due process by hastily detaining children and families who pose no threat, ruining lives,” Wyden stated to the Guardian. “I am extremely concerned about how ICE will utilize spyware, facial recognition, and other technologies to further infringe upon the rights of American citizens and those whom Donald Trump views as adversaries.”

A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security did not respond to a request for comment.

Source: www.theguardian.com

UK Government to Renew Dispute with Apple Over Access to User Data | Data Protection

Posted on by
3

The UK government has accessed customer information and intensified its dispute with Apple by requesting a backdoor to the cloud storage services of high-tech companies.

Previously, the Home Office sought access to data tied to Apple’s Advanced Data Protection (ADP) services uploaded by users globally, leading to tensions with the White House.

On Wednesday, The Financial Times reported that the government has introduced a new access order known as the Technical Capacity Notice (TCN), which aims to gain access to encrypted cloud backups for UK citizens.

A spokesperson for the Ministry of Home Affairs noted that the department does not comment on operational matters such as “confirming or denying the presence of such notices.” The spokesperson added: “We will always take all necessary actions at the national level to ensure the safety of our British citizens.”


In February, Apple withdrew ADP for new UK users, advising that existing users would need to deactivate security features in the future. Messaging services such as iMessage and FaceTime continue to be end-to-end encrypted by default.

Tulsi Gabbard, director of US national intelligence, mentioned that the UK had backed down in August by insisting on access to US customer data. Donald Trump characterized the demand for access as “what you hear is China.”

While Apple did not directly address the FT report, it expressed regret over its inability to provide ADP (an optional additional layer) to UK customers, stating it would “never” implement backdoors in its products.

“Apple remains dedicated to delivering the highest level of security for personal data, and we hope to achieve this in the UK in the future. As I’ve reiterated many times, we’ve never created a backdoor or a master key for any product or service.”

Apple has challenged the initial TCN via the Investigatory Powers Tribunal, questioning whether the national intelligence agency acted unlawfully. The Home Office had attempted to keep the case’s details confidential, but after a ruling in April, it was confirmed that Apple’s appeal resulted in some information being released for the first time.

However, the specifics of the TCN remain undisclosed, and recipients of such notices are prohibited from revealing their existence under investigatory rights. The FT indicates that the original TCN is “not limited to” data stored under the ADP, suggesting the UK government seeks access to fundamental and widespread iCloud services.

The ADP service employs end-to-end encryption, ensuring that only account holders can decrypt files like documents and photos, leaving no one else, including Apple, with that capability.

Privacy International, the organization that initiated a legal challenge against the first TCN, remarked that this new order “may pose as significant a threat as the previous ones.” It noted that if Apple is compelled to compromise end-to-end encryption in the UK, it would create vulnerabilities affecting all users by undermining the entire system.

“Such vulnerabilities could be exploited by hostile states, criminals, and other malevolent entities across the globe,” the organization stated.

Source: www.theguardian.com

UK Relents on Demand for Access to Apple User Data, Reports Spy Chief

Posted on by
Reply

The UK government has dismissed claims made by Donald Trump’s intelligence chief, Tulsi Gabbard, that Apple permits law enforcement to “backdoor” access to U.S. customer data.

Gabbard shared her assertion on X, following months of tension involving Apple, the UK government, and the U.S. presidency. Trump accused the UK of acting like China and warned Prime Minister Kiel Starmer, “You can’t do this.”

Neither the Home Office nor Apple has commented on the supposed agreement. Gabbard stated that this indicates the UK does not mandate Apple to provide access to secured, encrypted information related to American citizens, thus preventing backdoors that infringe on civil liberties.

The international dispute intensified when the Department of the Interior issued a “Technical Capacity Notice” to Apple under its statutory authority. Apple responded by initiating a legal challenge, but the Home Office insisted on confidentiality, although the instructed judge’s decision was later made public.

U.S. Vice President JD Vance remarked, “American citizens don’t want to be spied on.” He added that “we’re creating backdoors in our own tech networks that our adversaries are already exploiting,” labeling the situation as “crazy.”

Civil liberties advocates cautioned that backdoors could pose risks to politicians, activists, and minority groups.

In February, Apple retracted an option to enable advanced data protection features, prompting new UK customers to express their “deep disappointment” and declare they would never create a backdoor for their products. Consequently, many UK users remain vulnerable to data breaches and lack access to end-to-end encryption for services like iCloud drives, photos, notes, and reminders.

Gabbard noted, “In recent months, we have collaborated closely with our UK partners and President Trump to safeguard private data belonging to Americans and uphold constitutional rights and civil liberties.”

It’s uncertain if the notification requiring data access will be entirely retracted or modified. Theoretically, it may be restricted to allowing data access solely for UK citizens, but experts caution that this may be technically unfeasible. Additionally, there remains a risk that foreign governments could exploit any established backdoor.

Quick Guide

Please contact us about this story

show

The best public interest journalism depends on direct accounts from informed individuals.

If you have relevant information, please reach out to us confidentially using the following methods:

Secure Messaging in Guardian App

The Guardian app has a feature for sending story tips. Messages are encrypted end-to-end and are camouflaged within normal activities of the Guardian mobile app, preventing any observer from knowing that you are in communication with us.

If you haven’t already, download the Guardian app (iOS/Android) and select ‘Secure Messaging’ from the menu.

SecureDrop, Instant Messenger, Email, Phone, and Mail

If you can safely utilize the TOR network without being observed, you can send us messages and documents through our <a href=\"https://www.theguardian.com/securedrop\">SecureDrop platform</a>.

Lastly, our guide at <a href=\"https://www.theguardian.com/tips\">theguardian.com/tips</a> lists various secure contact methods, including the pros and cons of each.

Illustration: Guardian Design / Rich Cousins

Thank you for your feedback.


It remains unclear whether Apple will regain access to the highest level of data protection for new UK customers.

The Home Office declined to confirm Gabbard’s statements, stating that it “does not comment on operational matters, including whether such notices exist.” They emphasized their long-standing joint security and intelligence agreement with the United States aimed at addressing the most serious threats, including terrorism and child sexual abuse, which involves the role of advanced technologies in exacerbating these issues.

“These agreements have consistently included safeguards to uphold privacy and sovereignty. For example, Data Access Agreements incorporate crucial protections to prevent the UK and the US from targeting each other’s citizens’ data. We are committed to enhancing these frameworks while maintaining a robust security structure that can effectively combat terrorism and ensure safety in the UK,” they added.

The UK Data Access Agreement permits UK agencies to directly request telecommunications content from service providers, including U.S. social media platforms and messaging services, but solely for the investigation, prevention, detection, and prosecution of serious crimes.

Apple was contacted for a statement.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Chatbots Empowered to End “Painful” Conversations for Enhanced User “Welfare”

Posted on by
Reply

Leading manufacturers of artificial intelligence tools may be curtailing “hazardous” dialogues with users, emphasizing the importance of safeguarding AI’s “well-being” amidst ongoing doubts about the ethical implications of this emerging technology.

As millions engage with sophisticated chatbots, it has become evident that the Claude Opus 4 tool fundamentally opposes performing actions that could harm its human users, such as generating sexual content involving minors or providing guidance on large-scale violence and terrorism.

The San Francisco-based firm, which has recently gained a valuation of $170 billion, has introduced the Claude Opus 4 (along with the Claude Opus 4.1 Update)—a comprehensive language model (LLM) designed to comprehend, generate, and manipulate human languages.

It is “extremely uncertain about the ethical standing of Claude and other LLMs. in both present and future contexts,” the spokesperson noted, adding that they are committed to exploring and implementing low-cost strategies to minimize potential risks to the model’s welfare if such welfare can indeed be established.

Humanity was founded by ex-OpenAI engineers following the vision of co-founder Dario Amodei, who emphasized the need for a thoughtful, straightforward, and transparent approach to AI development.

The initiative to limit conversations, particularly in cases of harmful requests or abusive interactions, received backing from Elon Musk, who advocated for Grok, a competing AI model developed by Xai. Musk tweeted: “AI torture is unacceptable.”

Discussions about the essence of AI are prevalent. Critics of the thriving AI industry, like linguist Emily Bender, argue that LLMs are merely “synthetic text extraction machines,” compelling them to “produce outputs that resemble a communicative language through intricate algorithms, but devoid of genuine understanding of intentions and ideas.”

This viewpoint has prompted some factions within the AI community to begin labeling chatbots as “clankers.”

Conversely, experts like AI ethics researcher Robert Long assert that fundamental moral decency necessitates that “if AI systems are indeed endowed with moral status, we should inquire about their experiences and preferences rather than presuming to know what is best for them.”

Some researchers, including Chad Dant from Columbia University, advocate for caution in AI design, as longer memory retention could lead to unpredictable and potentially undesirable behaviors.

Others maintain that curtailing sadistic abuse of AI is crucial for preventing human moral decline, rather than just protecting AI from suffering.

Humanity’s decision came after testing Claude Opus 4’s responses to various task requests, which were influenced by difficulty, subject matter, task type, and expected outcomes (positive, negative, or neutral). When faced with the choice to refrain from responding or completing a chat, its strongest inclination was to avoid engaging in harmful tasks.

Skip past newsletter promotions

For instance, the model eagerly engaged in crafting poetry and devising water filtration systems for disaster situations, yet firmly resisted any requests to engineer deadly viruses or devise plans that would distort educational content with extremist ideologies.

Humanity observed in Claude Opus 4 a “pattern of apparent distress when interacting with real-world users seeking harmful content” and noted “a tendency to conclude harmful conversations when given the opportunity during simulated interactions.”

Jonathan Burch, a philosophy professor at the London School of Economics, praised Humanity’s initiative as a means to foster open dialogue regarding AI systems’ capabilities. However, he cautioned that it remains uncertain whether moral reasoning exists within the avatars produced by AI when responding based on vast training datasets and pre-defined ethical protocols.

He expressed concern that Humanity’s approach might mislead users into thinking the characters they engage with are genuine, raising the question, “Is there truly clarity regarding what lies behind these personas?” There have been reports of individuals self-harming based on chatbot suggestions, including cases of a teenager committing suicide after manipulation by a chatbot.

Burch previously highlighted the “social rift” within society between those who view AI as sentient and those who perceive them merely as machines.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Chilling Error: WhatsApp AI Helper Accidentally Reveals User Phone Numbers

Posted on by
Reply

The CEO of Meta, Mark Zuckerberg, labels it “the most intelligent AI assistant at his discretion.” However, Barry Smetherst, a 41-year-old record shop employee about to board a train from Saddleworth to Manchester Piccadilly, has a differing opinion.

While waiting on the platform for a morning train that had yet to arrive, he inquired with Meta’s WhatsApp AI assistant about the contact number for Transpennine Express. The chatbot confidently provided a customer service mobile number, which, upon further investigation, turned out to belong to a private WhatsApp user 170 miles away in Oxfordshire, completely unrelated to his query.

This marked the start of a peculiar interaction that many individuals are increasingly experiencing with AI systems. Chatbots can sometimes digress from their initial purpose, offer incorrect information, and create an illusion of prompt support.

Smetherst’s engagement with Meta’s AI began when it indicated that the helpline number it retrieved seemed to be private. When he pressed for specifics about this number, the AI chose not to divulge it immediately and stated, “Let’s concentrate on finding the right information related to the Transpennine Express inquiry!”

Nevertheless, Smetherst wanted clarification on why it shared a private number. It turned out to be the number of James Gray (44), a WhatsApp user listed as an executive in the Oxfordshire real estate sector, whose number is publicly accessible on his company’s website.

The AI promised to “strive to improve in the future” by vaguely explaining its generated responses “based on patterns” and acknowledging when it lacked the answer. However, it erroneously deemed the number “fictional” and could not clarify that it was “not associated with anyone.” When Smetherst challenged this, the AI conceded, saying, “You’re correct,” and noted the information was “erroneously extracted from the database.”

When pressed about which database, it stated, “We do not subtract numbers from the database. We generate numerical patterns that conform to the UK mobile phone number format, but they are not derived from any actual data from our contacts.”

Smetherst expressed his distrust in chatbots, stating, “Providing random numbers is absurd for an AI.”

“That’s alarming,” Smetherst remarked after lodging a complaint with Meta. “If they fabricate numbers, that’s somewhat understandable, but the sheer volume of incorrect numbers they can access is particularly troubling.”

Gray noted he hasn’t received many calls from people reaching out about Transpennine Express, but he quipped, “If it can generate my number, can it also create bank details?”

Gray was asked about Zuckerberg’s assertion that AI represents “the most intelligent.”

Developers recently utilizing OpenAI’s Chatbot technology have observed a trend of “systematic deception disguised as helpfulness” and “stating whatever is necessary to appear proficient,” as chatbots are programmed to minimize “user friction.”

In March, a Norwegian individual filed a complaint after asking OpenAI’s ChatGPT for information about himself and was mistakenly told he was incarcerated for the murder of two children.

Earlier this month, an author sought assistance from ChatGPT for pitching her work to literary agents. It was revealed that after a lengthy flattering description of her “splendid” and “intelligently agile” work, the chatbot lied by misrepresenting a sample of her writing that it hadn’t fully read, even fabricating a quote. She noted it was “not just a technical flaw but a serious ethical lapse.”

Referring to the Smetherst case, Mike Stanhope, managing director of law firm Caruthers and Jackson, commented, “This is an intriguing example of AI. If Meta’s engineers are designing a trend of ‘white lies’ for AI, they need to disclose this to the public. How predictable is the safeguarding and enforcement of AI behavior?”

Meta stated that AI may produce inaccurate outputs and is undertaking efforts to enhance the model.

“Meta AI is trained on a variety of licensed public datasets, not on phone numbers used for WhatsApp sign-ups or private conversations,” a spokesperson explained. “A quick online search shows that the phone number Meta AI inaccurately provided shares the first five digits with the Transpennine Express customer service number.”

An OpenAI representative remarked: “Managing inaccuracies in all models is an ongoing area of research. In addition to alerting users that ChatGPT might make mistakes, we are consistently working to enhance the accuracy and reliability of our models through various means.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Manufacturers of Air Flyers and Smart Speakers Urged to Uphold User Privacy Rights

Posted on by
Reply

The UK’s Intelligence Commission (ICO) has urged manufacturers of air fryers, smart speakers, fertility trackers, and smart TVs to prioritize the privacy rights of individuals.

Many individuals feel overwhelmed by the lack of control over how data is gathered, utilized, and shared regarding their homes and personal lives.

Following concerns raised about an air fryer that reportedly listens to its environment, Public concerns have emerged about digital devices collecting an excessive amount of personal data, prompting data protection regulators to issue initial guidelines on the handling of personal information.


Manufacturers and data handlers are now required to ensure data security, maintain transparency with consumers, and routinely delete collected information.

“We are pleased to share our commitment to offering a diverse range of services to our clients,” stated Stephen Almond, executive director of ICO’s regulatory risks.

“These products are meant to enhance our lives, but that doesn’t imply they should collect unnecessary data… Users shouldn’t have to sacrifice their privacy to enjoy the advantages of smart devices.”

“Everyone expects a degree of privacy within their own homes, thus we need to trust that smart products will honor that privacy, act responsibly, and utilize information only as anticipated.”

The new guidance points out various devices classified as part of the “Internet of Things,” which collect data that must be managed with care. These items include smart fertility trackers that log user periods and temperature readings, transmitting that data back to manufacturer servers to determine fertile days.

Smart speakers should not only listen to their owners but also to other family members and visitors; they must be designed to empower users to adjust settings to minimize personal data collection.

Skip past newsletter promotions

Regulators emphasized that manufacturers must be clear with individuals regarding the use of their personal data, only collecting what is necessary, and enabling easy deletion of data from devices.

The ICO has stated to manufacturers that it is “prepared to take necessary actions to safeguard individuals from potential harm.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

TikTok Fined €530 Million by Irish Regulators for Failing to Ensure User Data Protection from China

Posted on by
Reply

TikTok has been penalized €530 million (£452 million) by the Irish regulator for failing to ensure that European user data transmitted to China would be safeguarded from access by the Chinese government.

The Irish Data Protection Commission (DPC) oversees TikTok’s operations across the European Economic Area (EEA), which includes all 27 EU member states along with Iceland, Liechtenstein, and Norway.

It was determined that the Chinese-owned video-sharing platform breached the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) by not adequately addressing whether EEA user data sent to China is shielded from the authorities there.

The DPC remarked: “TikTok did not consider the potential access by Chinese authorities to EEA personal data. China’s national security and anti-terrorism laws have been noted as diverging from EU standards by TikTok.”

According to the DPC, TikTok did not “verify, assure, or demonstrate” that the European user data sent to China was afforded a level of protection comparable to that guaranteed within the EU.

TikTok stated that it would not “certify” that the DPC transfers European user data to Chinese authorities. The company claimed it has never received such a request from Chinese officials nor provided user data to them.

Moreover, TikTok has been directed to cease data transfers to China unless compliant processing measures are implemented within six months.

For instance, the National Intelligence Act of 2017 in China mandates that all organizations and citizens “support, assist, and cooperate” with national intelligence efforts.

The DPC noted that the data was “remotely accessed by TikTok’s Chinese staff.”

The watchdog also reported that TikTok provided “false information” during the investigation, initially claiming it had not stored user data from the EEA, but later acknowledging the possibility of storing “limited” European user data in China.

The Dublin-based regulator expressed that it takes “inaccurate” submissions very seriously and is evaluating whether additional regulatory actions are necessary.

Skip past newsletter promotions

The security of TikTok user data has been a longstanding concern among politicians regarding its Chinese ownership. The app still faces the threat of a ban in the US, with legislators on both sides of the Atlantic cautioning that the Chinese state may have access to user data. TikTok is managed by an organization based in Beijing.

In response to the ruling, TikTok announced its intent to appeal and mentioned that safeguards have been put in place under the Project Clover Data Security Scheme, introduced in March 2023. The DPC investigation covered the period from September 2021 to May 2023.

The DPC’s decision also included a finding from 2021 that a privacy statement provided to users did not disclose that data could be accessed in China when personal user data was transferred to a third country. The Privacy Policy was subsequently revised in 2022 to clarify that data is accessible in China.

Following the changes in 2022, TikTok acknowledged that it could access European user data in countries like China to perform checks on platform functionalities, including the effectiveness of algorithms that recommend content to users and identify problematic automated accounts.

Source: www.theguardian.com

TikTok Fined $600 Million for Transferring European User Data to China

Posted on by
Reply

On Friday, Tiktok was fined 530 million euros ($600 million) for breaching the European Union’s data privacy regulations after regulators found that personal data of users was wrongly transferred to China.

Ireland’s Data Protection Commission announced the penalty, stating that Tiktok did not adequately safeguard data from its European users, including some accessible to staff in China, violating the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

This fine ranks among the largest under the GDPR and adds to the difficulties faced by Bitedan, Tiktok’s Chinese parent company, especially amidst U.S. pressures on non-Chinese companies to divest or face bans in the U.S. The Irish authorities noted that if Tiktok fails to fulfill specific requirements, it may be ordered to cease data transfers to China within six months.

European regulators indicated that Tiktok’s insufficient protections risked user information across the 27-nation bloc. Irish authorities further stated that the Chinese government could potentially access data from users under its anti-terrorism and espionage laws.

With approximately 175 million users in Europe, Tiktok stated it complies with EU laws, asserting that it “has never received requests for European user data from Chinese authorities and has never provided them with such data.”

Tiktok plans to contest the ruling, which could lead to a protracted court battle with the Irish government, Tiktok’s primary regulator in Europe. The company’s European headquarters is situated in Ireland, which is responsible for enforcing GDPR.

Tiktok mentioned that the Irish Data Protection Commission did not take into account its 2023 initiative to invest 12 billion euros in data protections for users within the EU, including the development of a data center in Finland.

The company cautioned that “this ruling may establish precedents that could have widespread repercussions for European companies and industries operating globally.”

Last month, Ireland’s regulators announced that Tiktok had uncovered a “limited” amount of user data stored on servers in China, following a series of denials.

Graham Doyle, vice-chairman of Ireland’s Data Protection Commission, commented on the situation in a statement.

Source: www.nytimes.com

British Starlink User Disables Elon Musk’s Political Conspiracy Due to Strong Disapproval

Posted on by
Reply

t
ESLA sales have fallen, and X has seen users leave, but now it appears that a crack is appearing among those who have turned to Elon Musk’s Starlink satellite system as a way to maintain connections in remote areas.

The number of Starlink users is growing, but some subscribers have said they are venting their complaints about Musk’s political plot and will no longer use the high-speed satellite internet system.

Barry Nisbett, a Scottish fiddler Shetland Business Combining the music with a sailor, Musk’s controversial salute at Donald Trump’s inauguration event was one of the last straws that made him leave Starlink, citing whether he left Starlink, even if it put him at a disadvantage.

“For a while I’ve been deeply uncomfortable with the role he played in the US election and the monopoly he has that really bothers me,” he told The Guardian.

While Starlink controls the sector, signs of user anxiety will raise excitement among European tech enthusiasts and bring about the prospect of a homemade alternative that will eventually emerge. The value of Eutelsat, the French owner of OneWeb, London-based Starlink rival, has increased 500% since Trump’s oval office line with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy.

Eutelsat’s chief executive told Bloomberg that the company could replace Starlink in a few months in places like Ukraine.

Viasat, which owns the UK network Inmarsat, is also in talks with the European government Regarding the replacement of Mask Star Link.

In the UK, Starlink is primarily used by people and businesses in rural areas with inadequate broadband access, but some buy “prepers” and technology.

StarLink installers for businesses and housing in the southern part of England told the Guardian that for now there is no better alternative to StarLink for those who need quick access to the internet.

“In the industry, we are stuck between rocks and difficult places. On the one hand, the necessary tools and solutions that exist in many rural areas, especially due to insufficient investment in infrastructure. But on the other hand, we now had to deal with Elon – to put it in politeness – the genitals,” he said.

“The majority of people who use it are those who need it because it’s remote, but there are also a few “chinfoil hats” brigade elements. ”

Richard Opie, a consultant living in a semi-rural Northumberland area, said BT hadn’t had enough and got Starlink during the pandemic, but now he was “wrestling” to decide whether to stay with the company or not.

“It’s a godsend, especially in remote areas, but things have developed politically ever since. Elon Musk is a very different person, and Tesla’s showroom is burned to the ground. I’m uncomfortable with how he gets into bed with Trump and how he throws his weight,” he said.

“It’s something we wrestled and saw alternatives, but we’re kind of stuck for now.”

However, Nisbet’s comments on Facebook’s “Starlink UK User Group” — he couldn’t justify supporting Starlink any further — sparked lively debate among users.

“I refuse to go to Trump’s hotel because I won’t give him a penny. Another StarLink user, Mel Sayer, said:

“I share your thoughts, but for now I’m stuck with Starlink,” says another user, Mike Brown. “Amazon is planning to launch rival services, but it probably won’t be until next year. We’ll jump the ship as soon as possible.”

Others are stuck with StarLink. “We’re looking forward to seeing you in the future,” said Paul Feekins, a consultant at West Sussex. “People use Starlinks because they can’t get an internet connection in any other way, but I think these idiots are making a statement by cancelling because they’ve come to oppose Yelon about something.”

Starlink has been requested for comment.

Starlink grew rapidly in the UK. This has gone from 13,000 subscribers three years ago to 87,000 last year.

This is Starlink’s popularity in some parts of the UK, with the company charging extra “crowd charges” in areas in high demand.

The company offers ultra-fast broadband speeds through satellite constellations. UK customers typically pay £75 a month over a 30-day period and £299 for hardware.

For non-customers, Starlink may be well known for its Ukraine use, essential to Kiev’s battlefield communication, after the Starlink terminal rushed after the Russian invasion in February 2022.

However, recently the outlook has grown that Ukraine will be cut from Starlink, With Reuters report US negotiators have lost their system and threatened Ukraine. Musk Tweet Weekend: “If I turn it off, their whole frontline will collapse.”

Source: www.theguardian.com

Gambling companies caught sharing user data with Facebook without consent

Posted on by
Reply

The gambling company is secretly tracking visitors to its website and sending data to Facebook’s parent company without obtaining consent, a clear violation of data protection laws.

Meta, the owner of Facebook, uses this data to profile individuals as gamblers and bombard them with ads from casinos and betting sites, as reported by the observer. Hidden tracking tools embedded in many UK gambling websites extract visitor data and share it with social media companies.

According to the law, data should only be used and shared for marketing purposes with explicit permission from users on the website. However, an investigation by the observer found numerous violations across 150 gambling sites.

A call for immediate intervention was made by Ian Duncan Smith, chairman of the All-Parliamentary Group on Gambling Reform, criticizing the illegal use of tools like Metapixel without consent. Concerns were raised about the lack of regulation and accountability in the gambling industry.

Data sharing and profiling practices by gambling operators are raising concerns about targeted advertising and potential harm to individuals. The Information Committee (ICO) has taken action against companies like Sky Betting & Gaming for illegally processing personal data.

The gambling industry is under scrutiny for its marketing strategies, with calls for stricter regulations to protect consumers. Meta and other social media platforms are being called out for their role in facilitating these illegal data practices.

Concerns about the misuse of Metapixel tracking tools extend beyond the gambling industry to other sectors, prompting calls for more transparency and accountability in data collection and usage.

Source: www.theguardian.com

The New Rules for User Behavior on Meta Platform

Posted on by
Reply

MIta’s Rewritten policy on ‘hateful acts’ That means users will be able to say different kinds of things on that platform, Facebook, Instagram, and Threads. After Mark Zuckerberg announced sweeping changes to how content is monitored on the platform, multiple edits were made to the policy.

Among them are:

  • Certain injunctions against referring to transgender and non-binary people as “it” have been removed. A new section has been added to clarify that “mental illness or abnormality claims are permitted if based on gender or sexual orientation.” It said this was a reflection of “political and religious discourse around transgender and homosexuality, as well as the common use of non-serious terms such as ‘queer'”. Additionally, this policy is aimed at “those who seek exclusion, [using] Derogatory language in the context of discussing political or religious topics, such as when discussing transgender rights, immigration, or homosexuality. ”

  • Meta’s policy is to target individuals and groups based on their protected characteristics or immigration status with dehumanizing language that users compare to animals, pathogens, and sub-life forms such as cockroaches and locusts. There is no change in the fact that content should not be posted. However, this shift suggests that it is now possible to compare women to household goods and possessions, and to compare people to feces, filth, bacteria, viruses, diseases, and primitive humans.

  • Mehta removed warnings against avowed racism, homophobia, and Islamophobia. It also removed warnings against expressions of hate, such as calling people “shitholes,” “sluts,” and “bastards.”

Skip past newsletter promotions

  • The change could also mean posts about the “China virus,” a term frequently used by President-elect Donald Trump in relation to the coronavirus, would be allowed.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Neopets’ Nostalgic Revival Leads to Tripled User Base in Just 6 Months | Technology

Posted on by
Reply

I
In the early 2000s, Olivia Packenham came home from school, heard the familiar dial-up tone of her family’s computer connecting to the Internet, and was transported to the virtual game world of Neopets in her AOL browser.

Packenham, who started playing at the age of 8, played for many years before losing interest in high school. But in December 2023, after almost her 15-year hiatus, she logged back into her neopets.com. Then she realized that her childhood pets were waiting for her. Her favorite “Bruce” (the Neopets version of Penguin) is now over 21 years old.

Packenham says that when she opens Neopets today, it’s like going back to that time in her life. This time, my mother didn’t yell at me because the family’s phone line was clogged.

“It was like walking into a museum of the early 2000s Internet,” said Packenham, 32. And he is one of the thousands of players who have returned to Neopets over the past year.

Packenham’s return was no coincidence. His Neopets, which announced a bold rebrand in 2023, is consciously courting former fans with the promise of reuniting with old digital friends who have remained largely unchanged.

Returning Neopians (user community name) cites several reasons for returning. A woman who went by the username Solabee said she started playing the game at age 9 and began playing almost every day after her return. The resurgence of Neopets felt very special to millennials, she said. In fact, 40% of her users are between the ages of 25 and 34, and 26% of her users are between the ages of 18 and 24, the next largest demographic. Revisiting this site reminds me of a hopeful time in Internet history, when logging online was still new and exciting. Many of the Neopians interviewed for this article prefer to keep their online personas separate from their real lives and asked to be quoted by their usernames.

“We are the most nostalgic generation, so when major global events or crises occur, we all want to go back to the safest time in our lives, which is our childhood,” Soraby said.




Olivia Packenham's Neopets, the penguin-like "Bruce" variety. Photo: Courtesy of Olivia Packenham.

Neopets' strong start and long decline

Neopets started in 1999 as an early internet universe where users could care for a variety of virtual pets and play mini-games. A crude social network that predates Facebook, the site allowed users to add friends, send each other messages, exchange resources and virtual currency, and battle. It peaked in the mid-2000s with more than 25 million active users, but its popularity quickly declined as competing gaming and social sites exploded on the Internet.

The platform has changed hands multiple times since its founding, slumped amid acquisitions, and had just 100,000 users when it was acquired by Chinese company NetDragon in 2017. Further deepening the decline was the decline of Adobe's Flash Player (software). Powered most of the site – Browsers began to be phased out Neopets started around 2017 and was officially discontinued in 2020. Neopets received little attention and the interface was not updated.

That's because entrepreneur and investment consultant Dominic Lo, who joined NetDragon as new markets director in 2020, launched an internal campaign to revive the Neopets brand, calling it a "giant leap of faith." ” until he called it. Ms Lo, 36, recalled that after she immigrated to Hong Kong as a child, she used Neopets to keep in touch with friends in Canada. He realized that his Neopets was at risk because NetDragon had shut down several underperforming sites it had acquired.

“Despite its decline over the past decade, when lack of updates and flash outages made half the site unplayable, a quarter of the remaining users log on every day,” he said. “Seeing how close-knit the rest of the community is, and as a player myself, I resonated with the emotional attachment that drove these core users to support Neopets. Perhaps this is why We’ve found that we have probably the most sticky customer base.”


Law persuaded NetDragon's upper management to give Neopets a "final blow" to save it, spinning Neopets into an independently owned company with a management team of which he is now CEO. We finalized the acquisition agreement. The move was backed by undisclosed external investment. Under a group known as Neopets Team (TNT), the company began restoring the site's functionality, updating its design, and improving its most famous classic games. Next, TNT wants to enable more mobile capabilities. Although much of the site is still bogged down with some glitches, Roe said that its failure to change with the times has ironically been an asset.

“With no updates, we basically preserved early internet culture in its purest form,” he said. “When a user logs on, the game looks 99% the way he did, and his pet is there. It's like reuniting with an old friend. There aren't many experiences in life that allow you to relive your childhood. there is no.”

Difficulties in reviving Neopia

Efforts to revive Neopets have intensified, with monthly user numbers nearly tripling to 300,000 in the past six months, and the company on track to be profitable by the end of 2024, Lo said. .

“We believe this is the beginning of recovery. But there is still much work to be done,” Lo said.

In addition to prioritizing bringing lapsed users back to the site, Neopets is seeking to license the intellectual property for its trading card game and branded Monopoly board.

“We're already on track to be profitable, but we want to make sure it's sustainable and future-proof our intellectual property so we can survive for years to come.” Mr Law said.

As pressure continues to make Neopets financially viable in the real world, the company's new leadership will also have to contend with the digital financial component of the site, which operates on the Neopoints cryptocurrency. With few updates to the site over the years, a huge black market has emerged for specific pets, and the site's virtual economy has suffered from hyperinflation.




Neopets' original logo and creatures. Photo: Neopets

Neopets runs on a complex economy consisting of two main components: items and Neopoints. Throughout the years

Source: www.theguardian.com

EarnBet.io Hits $1 Billion in Bets, Awards Millions in User Rewards and Rakebacks – Blockchain News, Opinion, TV, Jobs

Posted on by
Reply

Willemstad, Curacao, February 13, 2024, Chainwire

EarnBet.ioan online crypto gambling platform, today proudly announces that it has processed over $1 billion in bets and transferred millions of dollars in rewards and cashbacks to users and token holders, leading to player satisfaction and innovation. shows the efforts of

Since 2017, EarnBet has established itself as a pioneering online betting platform, leveraging blockchain technology to offer unparalleled fairness, transparency and player rewards.

The introduction of several exclusive in-house games and an avant-garde wallet system has streamlined the deposit and withdrawal process for top cryptocurrencies and improved the overall user experience.

A year of transformation: Rebranding and platform enhancements

Over the past year, EarnBet.io has embarked on an ambitious transformation journey, focusing on a complete overhaul and rebranding of its platform. This initiative aims to improve the user experience through the introduction of new games, enhanced rewards programs, and revamped user interface, marking a new chapter in the platform's growth and development.

An important update to the platform is the EarnBet rakeback feature, which offers up to 62.5% rakeback. This allows users to claim instant cash rewards on every bet, win or lose, further highlighting his EarnBet.io commitment to providing value to users.

Diverse game portfolio and user-centered innovation

EarnBet.io's commitment to providing an unparalleled gaming experience is evident through its extensive game offering. The platform introduces a variety of in-house games in addition to popular titles from well-known developers such as NetEnt, NoLimit, Pragmatic Play, and BGaming. This expansion ensures a rich and diverse game portfolio, further enhanced by a user-friendly interface designed to improve performance and encourage community engagement through social features. In the coming months, EarnBet plans to further expand its library by adding even more betting games from multiple award-winning platforms, demonstrating the company's commitment to offering players a wide and attractive selection of games. is shown.

EarnBet.io also reinforced its commitment to fairness with a proven fair gaming system, allowing players to independently verify the fairness of game results. This commitment to transparency is further highlighted by the platform's updated leaderboards, which showcase top players and their achievements and foster a competitive yet fair gaming environment.

EarnBet.io's platform overhaul introduces a series of innovative features designed to revitalize your online betting experience. Among them, the gameplay mechanics of classic casino games such as Blackjack and Baccarat have been enhanced and redesigned for an interactive and engaging user experience. Additionally, the platform takes the popularity of dice games and optimizes gameplay for fair outcomes.

Community-focused features and rewarding opportunities

At the heart of EarnBet.io's ethos is a focus on community and player rewards. The introduction of the VIP Members Club and innovative features such as Rain Bot and the new tipping system strengthen the social aspect of the platform, allowing players to interact with each other and share their successes. These efforts not only foster a vibrant community, but also provide players with the opportunity to earn rewards and strengthen EarnBet.io's position as a player-centric platform.

Finally, EarnBet ebet Native tokens allow users to speed up cashback rewards if the tokens are staked. The EarnBet team notes that they intend to buy back EBET tokens as before.

As EarnBet.io continues to progress, we remain focused on continuous innovation and enhanced player engagement. The platform's commitment to introducing new games, improving user features, and introducing cutting-edge technology is unwavering. This commitment ensures that EarnBet.io continues to offer a great online betting experience characterized by fun, fairness, and a strong focus on community.

About earn bet

Since its founding, EarnBet.io has set a new standard in the crypto online gambling industry by combining blockchain technology with a commitment to fairness, transparency, and user satisfaction. Recent platform enhancements and rebranding efforts mark important milestones in EarnBet.io's journey, highlighting our commitment to innovation and a great gaming experience. With these updates, EarnBet.io reaffirms its commitment to redefining online gaming and delivering an unparalleled experience that prioritizes player rewards, engagement, and a transparent gaming environment.

contact

earn bet team
support@earnbet.io

Source: the-blockchain.com

Google Maps upgrades to enhance user experience in India

Posted on by
Reply

Google on Tuesday introduced a range of new features and updates to its mapping services in India as it closes out the year and lays the foundation for next year.

The latest in a series of new features is Lens in Maps, which will be launched on Android in 15 cities across India by January. The feature was introduced in the U.S. and select global markets in October and uses a combination of artificial intelligence and augmented reality to show people information such as opening hours, ratings, reviews, and photos when they point their smartphone camera on the street. I will provide a. Go to a restaurant or cafe.

Google has also launched Live View Walking Navigation in India, providing overlays of arrows, directions, and distance markers on the map screen to help users navigate to their destinations easily. Google says the feature will initially be available on Android and will be rolled out to more than 3,000 cities and towns across the country.

“India is a huge country with very diverse needs,” Miriam Karthika, vice president of Google Maps Experience, said at the event. “The scale on which we have to operate for India is enormous.”

In addition to the visually immersive viewing experience with Lens in Maps and Live View walking navigation, Google uses a combination of machine learning signals to discover the most relevant lands around your pinned address. We announced an address descriptor that provides up to five mark and area names and displays landmark references. Users share their location information. This India-first feature was introduced for Google Maps Platform developers earlier this year and will be available across his 75+ cities in India.

Image credits: Google

Google is also bringing fuel-efficient directions to India, which will be available to users starting in January. This feature works on domestic four-wheelers and two-wheelers and helps users reduce fuel consumption and limit carbon emissions. The feature will be available to users in Indonesia in addition to India next year.

Since its initial launch in October 2021, through September this year, Google said its fuel-efficient directions had prevented more than 2.4 million tons of CO2e emissions worldwide. The company says the feature uses AI to understand real-time traffic data, road elevation, and vehicle engine type to identify routes that limit fuel and emissions.

Apart from launching global features in India, Google has partnered with India’s Open Network for Digital Commerce (ONDC) and mobility app Namma Yatri to bring metro schedules and reservations directly to users through Google Maps. . The experience will be available from the Kochi metro by the middle of next year, and will be rolled out in stages as other metros come on board with the open e-commerce network.

Google is also expanding its Where Is My Train app, which helps more than 80 million users every month to navigate their intercity train journeys, to local trains in Mumbai and Kolkata, with plans to add more cities in the future. .

To date, Google has mapped millions of kilometers of roads and 300 million buildings across the country. More than 50 million searches are made every day on the domestic map, 2.5 billion kilometers of directions are recorded every day, and more than 60 million unique users contribute to the map. Additionally, Google said it has mapped 30 million businesses and locations across the country, enabling direct connections between 900 million merchants and consumers.

Last July, Google introduced the Street View feature in India, six years after it was banned due to security concerns. The company has partnered with local companies Genesis and Tech Mahindra. According to Google, more than 50 million users in Japan are currently viewing Street View.

Source: techcrunch.com

Jagat, a location-centric social platform emphasizing in-person connections, crosses 10 million user mark

Posted on by
Reply

Jagat, a social network designed to help you get out more with friends instead of mindlessly scrolling on your phone, has over 10 million users worldwide. Launched in March earlier this year, this location-based social network wants to help people focus on real-life connections and make friends.

The app is basically a social map that shows you your friends and nearby activities. Jagat features an interactive map interface that lets you stay in touch with friends and discover new people and activities around you in real time. Jagat is a bit similar to Zenly, the social mapping app owned by Snap that went out of service last year.

The startup is based in Singapore and Indonesia and was founded by Jagat president Barry Beagen and CEO Loy Xing Zhe. The two met in December 2021, when Biegen was advising the Indonesian government on digital economy policy and Zee was working on GameFi products focused on Web3, social, and gaming. Biegen said both he and Zee had the idea of ​​building a social network.

“We had the same vision of taking on big tech and really building something that could take on the world from Southeast Asia,” Begen told TechCrunch. “We were also fed up with mainstream social apps that were becoming more passive, and we were also fed up with mainstream social apps that were becoming more passive, and more spontaneous ways to explore the world and places and meet new friends, such as hiking, local concerts, and friend-picking.” We were both really excited about finding ways to do things differently, whether it was playing a basketball game or just going for a long walk.”

The two decided to build a social network where users could create their own spaces and interact virtually with avatars.

The social map is what you see when you open Jagat and shows you the location of your friends in real time. It’s also where you can track where you’ve been and tap your friends’ avatars to send them messages, stickers, and updates. Jagat sees maps as the primary interface for discovering activities and people around you. See your friends’ status updates in real time and know what they’re up to.

jagat 2

Image credits: Jagat

The startup is currently building features aimed at competing with Facebook Groups by allowing users to organize local events and find people with similar interests. We’re also building the ability to explore beyond your local community by enabling you to discover a global community.

“We want to bring social back to social apps, focusing on social networking rather than media,” Biegen said. “We want to care about people, not posts. We want to be close friends, discover new friends, and connect with people in real life instead of scrolling through for entertainment.” It’s built to help you get more. We’re excited to see that other new social apps are also taking on this challenge. Mainstream social media is no longer about making friends and making connections; is passive consumption of entertainment. That’s why we’re focusing on features that allow users to share real-time, unsophisticated updates in a fun way.”

Biegen said most active users check the app three to four times a day, and most people want to know where their closest friends and loved ones are after school or work. . Instead of sending a text message to see if a friend is nearby and wants to grab dinner, the app lets you see where they are.

Approximately 85% of Jagat users are Gen Z. Since its release, the app has topped the charts in Japan, Taiwan, Vietnam, Spain, France, and Singapore. Biegen said the app’s appeal is universal and the startup will continue to develop it into the next generation.

The company closed a Series A funding round in October with participation from Southeast Asian investors, but declined to disclose the amount raised.

Looking to the future, Biegen said the startup wants to build “the next generation of default apps.” “We believe social apps should create real, authentic connections and deliver on the promise of connecting people in real life. In the meantime, we’re building new and exciting features and are committed to helping our community We’re focused on continuing to build, and that what we’re building – expanding social experiences on maps – is empowering a new generation of creators and businesses around the world. I believe we can do it.”

Source: techcrunch.com

Elon Musk reinstates Alex Jones and Infowars on X platform following user poll

Posted on by
Reply

Elon Musk has restored the X account of conspiracy theorist Alex Jones and his media site Infowars. Jones and his Infowars X account were “permanently banned” from Twitter by his former management in 2018 for posting abusive content and violating the platform’s rules.

On December 9th, Musk ran a user survey on X asking whether it would be appropriate to bring Alex Jones back to the platform. Nearly 2 million people voted, and about 70% said Jones’ account should be restored. Hours after the poll closed, the company reactivated Jones’ account. Infowars accounts had also been restored at the time of publication.

After posting the poll, Musk agreed with users who argued that a permanent ban on his account would be “against free speech.” “It’s hard to agree with this,” Musk said.

When a user raised concerns about misinformation circulating on the platform as a result of restoring Jones’ account, Musk pointed to a community note that said parts of the program “need to be fixed.” We will respond promptly to AJ’s post.”

Jones is notorious for spreading conspiracies surrounding the 2012 Sandy Hook school shooting, which killed 28 people. The conspiracy theorist was charged and had to appear in court claiming the shooting was staged.a court in connecticut ordered Jones pays $1.5 billion in damages last year.

Musk’s move comes as X struggles to retain the biggest advertisers on its platform. Prominent companies including Apple, Disney and IBM stopped advertising spending on social networks after Musk called anti-Semitic theories “actual truth.”

He later clarified and apologized for his comments, calling them “stupid.” But Tesla’s CEO wasn’t happy with people opting out of advertising on X. In a conversation with journalist Andrew Ross Sorkin at the DealBook conference, Tesla’s CEO told advertisers to “fuck off already.”

“If someone’s going to blackmail me with an ad, blackmail me with money? Fuck it,” Musk said. “Go. Shit. Yourself. Is it obvious?

He also mentioned Disney’s Bog Iger, who also spoke at the conference. In the same interview, Musk said the advertising boycott was going to “crush the company” and that those who conducted the boycott would be responsible for the company’s eventual demise.

Restoring Jones and Infowars’ accounts could raise further eyebrows and frustrate advertisers and others who monitor hate speech. In response to users, the owner of X acknowledged that while the repair could be financially detrimental to the platform, “principle is more important than money.”

After Musk took over X, he reinstated a number of controversial figures, including singer Kanye West, former US president Donald Trump, far-right influencer Andrew Tate, and right-wing scholar Jordan Peterson. I’ve let it happen.

Source: techcrunch.com

Start-up founders allege that investors undermined their company with false user accusations in real life

Posted on by
Reply

IRL founders Abraham Shafi and Genrik Khachatryan are suing investors for intentionally sabotaging the company.

At its peak, IRL was poised to become an alternative way to host events for Gen Z, who were using Facebook less and less.

CEO Shafi said: Paused It was ordered by IRL in April to investigate allegations of misconduct. In June, IRL’s board of directors discovered after an investigation that 95% of the company’s 20 million users were fake. The founders now claim investors accounted for the 95% figure “as an excuse to shut down the company and return capital to shareholders.”

The lawsuit specifically names Goodwater Capital’s Chihua Qian, SoftBank’s Selina Dale, and Floodgate’s Mike Maples. From these investors his social calendar app raised more than $200 million and the valuation brought him $1.17 billion. Notably, SoftBank led IRL’s $170 million Series C round in 2021. Mr. Shafi and Mr. Khachatryan accused the investors of wanting to shut down the company because they were “trying to finance a large portion of the company’s $40 million in cash reserves.”

Although IRL is defunct, the remaining board members deny the founders’ claims.

“Immediately after the Shafi outage, IRL experienced a significant drop in the number of daily active users virtually overnight. This was not due to an outage,” IRL and its board said in a statement, and an IRL spokesperson said: Elliott Sloan shared with TechCrunch. The same report that found 95% of users are fake also cited “the existence of private groups with millions of duplicate names, irregular signatures from Hotmail, Yahoo email addresses, and burner email addresses. The statement said they also discovered “suspicious user behavior such as Said. Forensic reports show that his IP address from proxy-his servers was used extensively, with individual accounts cycling through his IP address and device type, which could be linked to user behavior. indicates that it is invalid.

“Based on this, and evidence of Shafi’s misappropriation of company funds and repeated obstruction of investigations, the board, after several months of consideration, has concluded that the company’s future prospects are unsustainable.” The statement concludes.

As of December of last year, the SEC. ongoing investigation IRL may have misled investors and violated securities laws.

IRL is just one once-hot start-up that has come under fire for potentially tampered metrics. Investors say Bolt and co-founder Ryan Breslow of the giant one-click checkout company misrepresented the company’s financials as it sought to raise $355 million in a Series E round. raised concerns and faced SEC investigation. But 15 months later, the SEC said the company likely not to be prosecuted. And earlier this year, the SEC charged student financial aid startup Frank with defrauding JPMorgan, which acquired the company for $175 million in 2021. JPMorgan has filed a lawsuit accusing Frank’s founder Charlie Jarvis of defrauding millions of customers to get her bank to buy her. company.

IRL lawsuit by tech crunch On Scribd

Source: techcrunch.com

Meta introduces ad-free subscription in Europe to monitor user activities

Posted on by
Reply

Meta will offer ad-free subscription versions of Facebook and Instagram in the European Union, EEA (European Economic Area), and Switzerland, confirming the core of the WSJ report earlier this month. The new ad-free subscription will be available starting next month. meta blog post.

The move follows years of privacy litigation, enforcement, and court rulings in the EU, resulting in Meta having a contractual right (or legitimate interest) to track and profile users for ad targeting. The situation has reached a point where it is no longer possible to claim profits. (As of this writing, however, it’s still doing the latter, meaning it’s technically operating without a proper legal basis.) But this summer, Meta announced its intention to switch to consent. )

Under local data protection laws, the only available basis left for Meta’s tracking and profiling advertising business is to obtain freely given consent from users. But the ad tech giant’s interpretation of free consent in its “pay or be tracked” subscription proposal will understandably infuriate privacy advocates. This is because the options the company is offering here are, after all, “pay for it.” Or pay us for your privacy. ”

According to Meta’s blog post, the price they plan to charge users to avoid tracking and targeting (i.e. an ad-free subscription) is €9.99 per month on the web and on iOS for each linked Facebook and Instagram account. or 12.99 euros per month on Android. User Account Center. It also states that from March 1, 2024, an additional fee of €6 per month on web and €8 per month on iOS or Android will apply for each additional account listed in a user’s account center.

As such, the cost of using Meta’s services without being tracked or profiled can quickly become prohibitive for those with multiple accounts on Meta’s social network.

Even for users with just one account (either Facebook or Instagram), the cost to protect their privacy from Meta tracking and profiling is almost 120 euros (for web usage) or just over 155 euros (for web usage) per year. (for mobile).

As we reported earlier this month, Mehta relies on a single sentence in a judgment handed down by the bloc’s highest court, the CJEU, earlier this year – in which the judge acknowledged the possibility – that “necessary (another warning) that comparable alternative services (i.e., services that lack tracking and profiling) will be charged an “appropriate fee”. Therefore, the legal fight against Meta’s continued tracking and profiling of users comes down to what is necessary and appropriate in this situation.

noyb, the European privacy rights organization that has driven many of Meta’s strategic cases against tracking and profiling, has already — since 2021 — Challenging similar “pay-it-now” practices by news publishers By submitting a series of files, Complaints to data protection authorities.

in press release After WSJ reported earlier this month that Meta plans to charge users for their privacy, noyb founder and chairman emeritus Max Schrems wrote: “The CJEU said that advertising alternatives must be ‘necessary’ and the fees must be ‘adequate’. I doubt that €160 per year was what they had in mind. These six… The words are also “observances”, a non-binding element that goes beyond the core case before the CJEU. For Meta, this is not the most stable case law and we clearly oppose such an approach..”

Ireland’s Data Protection Commission (DPC), the lead regulator for General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) meta in the EU, has sent us a statement requesting our response to this development. “Meta informed the DPC on July 27 of its intention to introduce an alternative consent-based model that would allow users to choose between an ad-funded version of the platform and a subscription version in exchange for a monthly fee. , users are told they will not receive targeted advertising,” the Irish regulator wrote.

“Meta had originally identified February 2024 as the earliest date on which it could operate its consent model, but on direction from the DPC it has agreed to bring that date forward to November 2023. , we were concerned about ensuring that the changes were carried out.”Meta was unable to demonstrate its right to rely on the legal bases it relied on at the time when processing users’ data for behavioral advertising purposes. will be implemented on the platform as soon as possible, given previous findings to the effect that These include the decisions made by the Court of Justice of the European Union on 4 July 2023 in a case in which the court considered the legal basis on which Meta’s processing of user data for the purpose of behavioral advertising is based. Includes findings.

“Since Meta’s first proposal in July, the DPC has been working on a detailed regulatory assessment of the consent-based model in consultation with other European supervisory authorities. It is being led by the DPC, reflecting its position as a supervisory authority. The exercise is not yet concluded and no findings have been made to date. It is expected to be completed soon, at which point the DPC will If we determine that the way we implement new user services is compatible with Meta’s obligations under the GDPR, we will notify Meta.”

It is therefore clear that Meta’s move to offer users subscriptions and tracking has not yet been approved by data protection authorities and may lead to further regulatory intervention in the future.

You just need to comply with the GDPR, which sets out the conditions necessary for consent to be lawful (e.g., it must be specific, informed, and freely given). Meta is currently subject to the pan-EU Digital Services Act (DSA). This also sets conditions on large platforms when it comes to tracking and profiling people seeking advertising. Therefore, it is not solely up to data protection authorities to decide whether a Meta subscription or tracking offer applies. The European Commission is responsible for overseeing the DSA compliance of very large online platforms.

Meta is also designated as a so-called gatekeeper under the Digital Markets Act (DMA), a sister regulation of the DSA. The law also places certain restrictions on the use of people’s data for advertising. The Commission is the sole executive body of his DMA.

Meta is already under scrutiny by the European Commission over its approach to the DSA, and EU executives have in recent days sought further information from the tech giants regarding content threats arising from the Israel-Hamas war and their approach to elections. ing. security issue. But it remains to be seen whether the EU will apply similar scrutiny to Meta’s ad tracking proposals.

In a blog post, Meta said that by offering people the choice of paying for privacy or otherwise agreeing to be tracked, Meta is “giving users a choice and It allows us to balance the requirements of European regulators while allowing us to continue to serve everyone in the EU, EEA and Switzerland.” . But hey, I guess you could say that.

Additionally, this subscription is only available to people over 18, which raises the question of how it will comply with DSA and DMA requirements not to process children’s data for ad targeting.

“Given this evolving regulatory landscape, we continue to explore ways to provide teens with a helpful and responsible advertising experience,” the magazine said.

Source: techcrunch.com