How Quantum Fluctuations Ignite the Universe’s Greatest Mysteries

Small Vibrations Marking the Universe’s Formation

Joseph Kuropaka / Alamy

Discover more insights in the Lost in Space-Time newsletter. Register for the latest updates from the universe.

Introduction

Since the 5th century AD, the phrase “In the beginning” has sparked intrigue, originating from the writings of an Israeli priest known as “P.” This profound beginning resonates with our modern understanding of the cosmos. Here’s a glimpse into the universe’s birth:

Words falter when describing the universe’s origins, transcending mere physics and human experience. By retracing our steps, we assert that the universe emerged from a hot Big Bang approximately 13.8 billion years ago. The early universe, characterized by rapid expansion, underwent quantum fluctuations, which left enduring marks.

These fluctuations allowed some regions to expand more rapidly, forming hyperdensities of hot matter, while others lagged, resulting in varying densities. About 100 seconds post-Big Bang, baryonic matter took shape: hydrogen nuclei, helium nuclei, and free electrons. Alongside, dark matter emerged as its elusive counterpart.

Initially, the universe existed as a hot plasma—fluidic and dominated by intense radiation—expanding with Big Bang momentum, aided by dark energy. As expansion slowed over 9 billion years, dark energy escalated the expansion rate.

This early universe’s excess density was predominantly dark matter, with small baryonic matter contributions. Gravity pulled these together, while radiation acted as a binding force. The pressure from this radiation created acoustic vibrations or sound waves within the plasma.

Although these waves were not audible, they traveled faster than half the speed of light, with wavelengths spanning millions of light-years. This era signifies the genesis of our universe.

As the pressure waves from radiation expanded outward, they dragged negatively charged electrons and their heavier baryon counterparts. Dark matter, indifferent to radiation interactions, remained behind, resulting in a spherical wave of dense baryonic material expanding outward.

The propagation speed of these sound waves reflected the baryonic material and radiation’s density. Early waves had smaller amplitudes and higher frequencies, readily damped after minimal cycles, akin to ultrahigh-frequency sound waves.

As the universe continued its expansion and cooldown, roughly 380,000 years later, electrons merged with hydrogen and helium nuclei, giving rise to neutral atoms in a process known as recombination. This event, spanning about 100,000 years, produced cosmic background radiation—an elusive imprint awaiting discovery.

Map of Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation Exhibiting Density Fluctuations

Collaboration between ESA and Planck

The radiation pressure and sound speed decreased significantly, creating a frozen spherical shell of baryonic material, similar to debris washed ashore by a storm. The largest compressional wave left behind a concentrated sphere of visible matter, termed the sonic horizon, roughly 480 million light-years from the original overdensity.

Early compressional waves left minor imprints on the universe’s matter distribution, while later waves, generated right before recombination, exhibited greater amplitude and lower frequency, observable in today’s cosmic background radiation.

Consequently, regions of high density yield slightly warmer background radiation, while lower density areas produce cooler radiation. This frozen state incorporates traces of matter distribution just after the Big Bang, known as a “feature of the universe.”

The wavelength of these final sound waves closely relates to the curvature of space, while the Hubble constant integrates our understanding of the cosmos measured over 13 billion years.

Both quantum fluctuations and acoustic vibrations provide distinct signatures, akin to cosmic fingerprints. The first evidence emerged on April 23, 1992, revealing temperature variations in a cosmic background radiation map produced by the COBE satellite. George Smoot, the lead researcher, highlighted its monumental significance, describing it as a divine encounter for believers.

Observing distinct directions in the cosmos creates a triangle projecting into space, with the vertex angle referred to as the angular scale. A favorable horizon results in a higher probability of encountering a hot spot within the cosmic background approximately 480 million light-years from another hot spot, corresponding to an angular scale of around 1°.

This measurement surpasses the resolution of earlier instruments, with the WMAP and Planck satellite missions unveiling additional acoustic vibrations down to angular scales under 0.1°.

The origins of baryonic matter contributed to cosmic structures, with small overdensities serving as seeds for star and galaxy formation, while underdensities created voids within the universe’s large-scale structure, known as the cosmic web. Thus, the probability of finding galaxy chains roughly 480 million light-years from each other slightly increases.

By analyzing acoustic vibrations, astrophysicists have accurately assessed cosmological parameters, including baryonic matter density, dark matter, dark energy, and the Hubble constant among others. However, contentment is elusive, as the standard cosmological inflation model (Lambda CDM) reveals we only observe 4.9% of the universe, with dark matter comprising 26.1% and dark energy making up 69%.

The enigma remains: we have yet to uncover the true nature of dark matter and dark energy.

Jim Baggott’s upcoming book, Disharmony: A History of the Hubble Constant Problem, is scheduled for release in the US by Oxford University Press in January 2026.

Topics:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Why Dark Matter Is Still One of Science’s Greatest Mysteries

“As we approach the late 2020s, it is an incredibly exciting era for dark matter research…”

Sackmestelke/Science Photo Library

This is an extraordinary moment for dark matter researchers. Despite cuts in funding from governments globally, dark matter continues to represent one of the most captivating and significant unsolved mysteries in physics and in the broader scientific landscape. The majority of matter in the universe seems invisible. For every kilogram of visible matter, there are approximately five kilograms of dark matter. This is inferred from the gravitational influence dark matter exerts on the structures of visible components in the universe.

Galaxy clusters are most effectively explained when considering dark matter as a component. Observations of the distribution of the earliest light in the universe fit theoretical predictions only by including dark matter in the model. Many other observations similarly support this view. Dark matter is abundant and remains undetectable unless we study its effects on normal matter.

As we enter the late 2020s, it’s a thrilling period for dark matter research. Investigations by the European Space Agency’s Euclid Space Telescope promise to deepen our understanding of galactic structures. Simultaneously, the Vera C. Rubin Observatory has commenced a decade-long sky survey that is likely to transform our comprehension of satellite galaxies orbiting larger galaxies. These dynamics enhance our understanding of how dark matter influences visible matter.

Exploring phenomena we know exist yet cannot observe directly challenges our creativity as scientists. Some of the pivotal questions that we must ponder include: Can we trap dark matter particles in a laboratory setting? If not, what methods can we employ to analyze their properties?

The solution lies in progressing from established knowledge. We suspect that dark matter behaves similarly to known matter, indicating we might utilize the same mathematical frameworks, like quantum field theory (QFT), to investigate it.


We are increasingly focusing on finding evidence of dark matter scatterings, not just impacts on targets.

Quantum field theory can seem complex, and indeed it is. However, a deep understanding is not mandatory to grasp its essence. It is potentially the most fundamental physical theory, harmonizing special relativity with quantum mechanics (excluding general relativity). It suggests that interactions at any point in the universe might give rise to particles due to respective fields.

Imagine a strawberry field. Strawberries grow in specific places due to certain characteristics of those space-time coordinates. These areas possess conditions suitable for strawberry flowers to flourish. The potential for strawberries exists throughout the field, yet only select areas yield blossoms. Similarly, QFT posits the existence of particles.

QFT is intricate, a realm where even experts invest years to cultivate understanding. Even when considering the application of QFT to dark matter to glean useful insights, a critical question arises: How can one formulate an equation for something with minimal known properties?

Sociologically, it’s fascinating to observe the varied responses from scientists. Over the past decade, a popular method for addressing what remains unknown has involved crafting “effective field theory” (EFT). EFT enables the formulation of generalized equations that can be adapted based on empirical observations.

EFT can also be designed with specific experimental frameworks in mind. A key strategy for unraveling dark matter mysteries involves conducting direct detection experiments. Through these efforts, we aspire to witness interactions between dark and visible matter that yield observable results in ground-based studies. Over the years, methods of direct detection have matured and diversified. Researchers are not only looking for signs of dark matter striking targets; they are increasingly seeking footprints of dark matter scattering from electrons. This shift requires an evolution of EFT to accommodate new experimental insights.

In a recent preprint, researchers Pierce Giffin, Benjamin Lillard, Pankaj Munbodh, and Tien-Tien Yu present an EFT aimed at better addressing these scattering interactions. This paper, which has not yet undergone peer review, captured my attention as a prime example of research that may not make headlines but represents essential progress. Science demands patience, and I trust our leaders will remain cognizant of that.

Chanda Prescod-Weinstein is an associate professor of physics and astronomy at the University of New Hampshire. She is the author of Turbulent Universe and upcoming books The Ends of Space and Time: Particles, Poetry, and the Boogie of Cosmic Dreams.

What I Am Reading
I just completed the captivating debut novel by Addie E. Sitchens: Dominion.

What I See
I recently caught up on the summer episodes of Emmerdale, and they were quite surprising!

What I Am Working On
My collaborators and I are exploring intriguing new research ideas related to dark matter scenarios.

Topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Elon Musk, AI, and ‘Radical Left Activism’: Insights from Wikipedia’s Creator on Its Greatest Threat

Few websites are as essential to the internet as Wikipedia.

This digital encyclopedia was established by Jimmy Wales roughly 25 years ago while he was involved with the expert-driven initiative “Nupedia.”

Although Nupedia didn’t gain traction, its successor evolved into one of the most significant platforms online. Currently, there are over 7 million articles available in English alone.

So, where does Wikipedia stand as distinguishing fact from fiction becomes increasingly challenging and artificial intelligence (AI) transforms how we generate and access knowledge?

To explore this, BBC Science Focus held a discussion with Wales. He shared insights on the evolution of platforms over the last two decades, the challenge of sustaining trust and neutrality amidst misinformation, and how AI might shape the future.







SF: You’ve mentioned that social media contributes to a decline in trust. Can Wikipedia still thrive in such an environment?

JW: I believe we can certainly hold our own. I don’t necessarily view it as a competition, akin to business rivalries or transportation competition.

There’s a growing sentiment advocating for a shift from cultural conflicts to more thoughtful and respectful interactions, embracing differences, and promoting dialogue across divides.

Yet, division is an inherent aspect of human nature. For instance, when people discuss today’s youth, they often claim they lack attention spans and are perpetually glued to their phones. However, it’s evident that while they enjoy captivating short-form content, they can also binge-watch intricate TV series for extended hours.

Both represent facets of the human experience and can exist simultaneously—light-hearted social media and serious inquiry. Much like our dietary habits, we should ensure a balance, avoiding just junk food while incorporating nutritious options.

SF: How has Wikipedia managed to foster a relatively constructive culture while the rest of the internet seems to decline?

JW: I appreciate your use of “relatively constructive,” which recognizes that we face internal disputes and occasional anger—it’s part of being human.

It’s fundamentally about design—both in terms of software and what I term community design. It’s a blend of various factors.

When a business model relies heavily on ad revenue and user engagement, it becomes tempting to promote content that elicits longer viewing times, anger, or arguments, rather than happiness. This approach can be unhealthy in the long term.

Conversely, Wikipedia operates without ads and is funded by public donations. Thus, our model positions us as a charity, which means we aim to minimize clicks and keep users engaged without overwhelming them.

This necessitates a divergent approach to site design and community guidelines.

Civilized discussion is crucial. Without it, Wikipedia could become rampant with misinformation. I believe numerous foundational elements contribute to our success.

SF: Recently, Wikipedia has encountered increased criticism—Elon Musk even referred to it as “Walkpedia.” How do you feel about that?

JW: That’s unfortunate. When Elon labels us “Walkpedia,” he’s mistaken and misinformed. That assertion is baseless.

For instance, regarding transgender topics, there’s a common “gotcha” question: “What is a woman?” Wikipedia’s entry for “female” defines it as “an adult female human being.” This is indisputable, isn’t it?

Furthermore, the entry also addresses more nuanced discussions surrounding gender in society, which add depth.

Elon Musk recently introduced Grokipedia, an AI-powered competitor to Wikipedia – Credit: Getty

Claiming that we’ve turned into some sort of radical leftist organization is simply misguided. Of course, there are areas worthy of refinement. At times, you may examine an article and feel it’s unjust towards one party, and these instances require critical reflection and effort.

The solution lies in engaging more individuals. I would welcome more compassionate and thoughtful individuals who recognize bias in Wikipedia articles to realize that contributions stem from source material, rather than assuming it’s the work of some radical activist ready to block dissenters.

While certain perspectives may lack representation, we can incorporate them and work toward a more balanced viewpoint.

read more:

SF: As reliance on AI for information grows, could Wikipedia face obsolescence?

JW: I hesitate to say “never,” as the future of technology is unpredictable. However, at present, we don’t foresee a significant impact in that regard.

A Pew Research study indicates that Wikipedia appears in about 3% of the top 10 results in standard Google searches, whereas Google’s AI summaries link to Wikipedia approximately 6% of the time.

This dynamic means Wikipedia is frequently referenced in Google AI summaries, although fewer users are inclined to click those links. We’re not overly concerned about clicks, but it remains a trend to monitor.

Personally, I utilize AI extensively and have discovered that its strengths lie in scenarios that wouldn’t typically generate interest on Wikipedia.

Forty years ago, I would have assumed that the first AI able to write in English would be dull and purely factual, merely regurgitating information. Surprisingly, I find that AI excels in creative brainstorming. It’s impressively effective.

Jimmy Wales was the first individual to edit Wikipedia, writing “Hello, World!” right after its launch in 2001. – Credit: Getty

SF: Are you concerned that Wikipedia’s biases could influence the AI models trained on its extensive content?

JW: Absolutely. This is a crucial focus, particularly for those developing AI models.

From what I’ve observed, the largest data sources for most advanced language models (LLMs) are Wikipedia and Reddit. While both are valuable, they have inherent limitations, particularly since both are predominantly male-dominated.

We are striving for awareness, as Wikipedia prioritizes neutrality. Yet, if we’re not vigilant, we risk unintentionally reinforcing existing biases.

At the same time, LLMs can be trained and directed, making it feasible to envision an AI continuously navigating through Wikipedia, identifying biases, and flagging articles in need of revision.

If utilized appropriately, this process could highlight instances where, for example, articles about male Nobel Prize-winning economists mention their families, while articles about female winners do not. Such insights are intriguing and may go unnoticed.

This conversation has been condensed for brevity and clarity.


Jimmy Wales’ new book, The 7 Rules of Trust, is available for purchase now.

read more:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

This Unusual Miniature Frog Defies Nature’s Greatest Laws

The world is full of fascinating paradoxes. For instance, does this article even exist before you’ve read it? If I traveled back in time and eliminated my grandfather, would I still be here writing this? And why is it that two socks can fit into the washing machine, yet only one emerges? Perhaps one of the grandest paradoxes is how a frog can shrink as it matures.

Meet the paradoxical frog (Pseudis Paradoxa). These frogs lay their fertile eggs in South America’s lakes and lagoons, where they hatch into tadpoles that begin to consume the eggs.

The voracious larvae feed mainly on algae and begin to grow quite rapidly. Initially, they develop like ordinary tadpoles, but…

If conditions are ideal, these tadpoles can grow remarkably large. Bigger than blueberries, larger than strawberries—think of it as if “satsuma stuffed into ankle socks.” That gives you a sense of their size, and perhaps you’ve even located your missing socks.

The tadpoles of the paradox frog, with their plump, rounded bodies and long muscular tails, can reach lengths of up to 22cm (8.6 inches). Rearrange the movie Jaws, and you’ll need a bigger jam jar!

This size is about three times more significant than the adult frogs they eventually become, with much of the necessary development already complete.

By the time they morph from tadpoles to frogs, males possess well-formed testes and can produce sperm, while females create mature eggs.

This is distinct from typical frog tadpoles, which take longer to reach sexual maturity during the male frog phase of their life cycle.

Paradoxical frog tadpoles can grow up to 22cm (8.6 inches). – Photo credit: Aramie

So, how does a giant tadpole transform into such a small frog? It’s remarkably simple! At least half of the paradoxical frog tadpoles are made up of tails. Once they lose their tails, they undergo a normal transformation into relatively small adults, measuring about 7cm (approximately 2.5 inches).

This “contraction” of the amphibians explains the phenomenon often referred to as frog shrinkage.

The paradox appears resolved. Yet, as one riddle is solved, another emerges: Why do the tadpoles expend such energy in growing so large in the first place?

One possible explanation lies in the timing and location of their birth. Paradoxical frogs time their spawning for the rainy season.

In Trinidad, this occurs around May.

Some eggs are laid in permanent bodies of water, while others are deposited in fleeting ponds that eventually dry up. Those born in small, temporary locations with limited food and aquatic predators do not grow much. In contrast, tadpoles born in larger, more stable ponds with abundant food and fewer predators tend to thrive.

In these circumstances, growing larger can enhance survival since larger tadpoles are less likely to be consumed by predatory fish and other animals.


If you have questions, please email us at Question @sciencefocus.com or Message Facebook, Twitter, or Instagram (please include your name and location).

Check out our ultimate Fun fact and explore more amazing science content!


Read more:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com

Unattainable Particles Hinting at the Universe’s Greatest Secret

Sure! Here’s a rewritten version while preserving the HTML structure:

<div id="">
    <p>
        <figure class="ArticleImage">
            <div class="Image__Wrapper">
                <img class="Image" alt="A new scientist. Science News and Long read from expert journalists covering science, technology, health, and environmental developments." width="1350" height="900" src="https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/25114701/SEI_248764888.jpg" sizes="(min-width: 1288px) 837px, (min-width: 1024px) calc(57.5vw + 55px), (min-width: 415px) calc(100vw - 40px), calc(70vw + 74px)" srcset="https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/25114701/SEI_248764888.jpg?width=300 300w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/25114701/SEI_248764888.jpg?width=400 400w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/25114701/SEI_248764888.jpg?width=500 500w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/25114701/SEI_248764888.jpg?width=600 600w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/25114701/SEI_248764888.jpg?width=700 700w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/25114701/SEI_248764888.jpg?width=800 800w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/25114701/SEI_248764888.jpg?width=837 837w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/25114701/SEI_248764888.jpg?width=900 900w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/25114701/SEI_248764888.jpg?width=1003 1003w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/25114701/SEI_248764888.jpg?width=1100 1100w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/25114701/SEI_248764888.jpg?width=1200 1200w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/25114701/SEI_248764888.jpg?width=1300 1300w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/25114701/SEI_248764888.jpg?width=1400 1400w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/25114701/SEI_248764888.jpg?width=1500 1500w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/25114701/SEI_248764888.jpg?width=1600 1600w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/25114701/SEI_248764888.jpg?width=1674 1674w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/25114701/SEI_248764888.jpg?width=1700 1700w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/25114701/SEI_248764888.jpg?width=1800 1800w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/25114701/SEI_248764888.jpg?width=1900 1900w, https://images.newscientist.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/25114701/SEI_248764888.jpg?width=2006 2006w" loading="eager" fetchpriority="high" data-image-context="Article" data-image-id="2478096" data-caption="" data-credit="Adobe Stock"/>
            </div>
            <figcaption class="ArticleImageCaption"></figcaption>
        </figure>
    </p>
    <p>For over a decade, floating cranes have been lowering unusual cargo to depths of around 3,000 meters in the Mediterranean. These objects resemble something from a different realm: large, shiny spheres filled with electronic devices. In reality, they are detectors for a project called <a href="https://www.km3net.org/">KM3Net</a>, which aims to explore one of the most enigmatic fundamental particles.</p>
    <p>The facility has been in operation for only a few years. In 2023, <a href="https://www.cppm.in2p3.fr/web/en/pratical_info/directory/Y295bGVAY3BwbS5pbjJwMy5mcg==.html">Paschal Coyle</a> was astonished to discover a significant signal in the preliminary data. While it turned out to be a neutrino, it was unlike anything previously observed. "My program crashed when I first encountered this event," recalls Coyle, a physicist from the Centre for Particle Physics in Marseille, France.</p>

    <p>KM3Net detected neutrinos with roughly 35 times the energy of any previously recorded instances. These neutrinos were thousands of times more energetic than those produced by our best particle accelerators. Neutrinos are notoriously difficult to study as they interact very weakly with matter, making their detection elusive. This challenge was a key factor in placing the detectors on the ocean floor, a decision that seemed almost improbable.</p>
    <p>Now, the scientific community is racing to understand what could have generated this phenomenon in space. Astronomers are exploring two primary theories, both of which delve into some of the universe's most profound mysteries. Unraveling the origin of this particle will enhance our understanding of neutrinos and...</p>
</div>

Feel free to adjust any specific terms as needed!

Source: www.newscientist.com

Harnessing Clues from Honey to Address Biodiversity’s Greatest Challenges

Foraging bees carry pollen from surrounding plants back to the hive

Eric Tourneret

If you’re lucky enough to find one, dip your fingers into a jar of honey from Pitcairn Island, a remote British Overseas Territory in the South Pacific. Honey is the island’s main export and highly prized among foodies. Pure and free of pesticides and pollutants, the honey infuses the delicious subtropical scents of Pitcairn Island plants, including passionflower, mango, guava and rose apple.

Honey contains much more information, if only we knew how to look for it. Breaking a container of honey opens a gateway to an entire ecosystem. Honey contains a detailed record of everything the bee encountered while foraging – not just the flowers that provided it with nectar and pollen, but also other plants, insects, fungi, viruses and larger animals in the environment.

He explains that honeybees are “passive bioaccumulators.” Parwinder Kaur As the bees go about their day, their fluffy bodies unwittingly collect samples of whatever they come into contact with, which then mix into the honey the bees produce, says researcher David Schneider of the University of Western Australia in Perth. “It’s got everything in it,” he says. Luca Fontanesi at the University of Bologna in Italy. “Well, almost everything.”

Scientists are now realizing that they have the potential to reach into that honey pot and garner sweet morsels of information that are currently hard to come by. Using advanced DNA tools, researchers are using honey to gather data on bee health, the general state of biodiversity in the bees’ foraging areas, and disease in the broader environment. They could identify possible culprits behind the mysterious Colony Collapse Disorder that is wiping out beehives, and…

Source: www.newscientist.com

Report states Europe is experiencing the greatest rate of warming among all continents

Europe is the continent experiencing the most rapid increase in temperature, with its temperatures rising at approximately twice the global average, as reported by two top climate watchdogs on Monday. This raises concerns about human health, glacier melting, and the impact on economic activity.

The World Meteorological Organization of the United Nations and the European Union’s climate change agency Copernicus jointly reported that the African continent has the potential to transition to renewable resources like wind, solar, and hydropower in response to the effects of climate change. There is an opportunity to develop specific strategies to accelerate action on climate change.

Last year, the European Climate Report stated that the continent generated 43% of its electricity from renewable sources, up from 36% the previous year. In Europe, more energy was produced from renewables than fossil fuels for the second consecutive year.

According to the report, the latest five-year average temperature shows Europe to be currently 2.3 degrees Celsius (4.1 degrees Fahrenheit) above pre-industrial levels, compared to the global temperature being 1.3 degrees Celsius warmer. This is just below the target set in the 2015 Paris climate agreement to limit global warming to 1.5 degrees Celsius.

Firefighters and volunteers extinguish a burning field during a forest fire in Salonida, Greece, July 17, 2023.
Nick Paleologos/Bloomberg from Getty Images File

“Europe has continued to face rising temperatures and extreme weather events this year, including heat stress from record temperatures, wildfires, heatwaves, glacier ice loss, and inadequate snowfall,” said Elisabeth Hamdoush, Deputy Division Chief of the EU Executive Director Copernicus.

This report complements the World Meteorological Organization’s flagship State of the World Climate Report, which has been published annually for 30 years and this year issued a “Red Alert” warning that the world is not taking sufficient action to combat the effects of global warming.

In March, Copernicus reported achieving a record for 10 consecutive months of record-breaking temperatures. According to a European report, the average sea surface temperature across oceans in Europe is expected to reach its highest annual level in 2023.

This year’s European report focuses on the impact of high temperatures on human health, noting a rise in heat-related deaths across the continent. Over 150 lives were directly lost due to storms, floods, and wildfires last year.

Economic losses related to weather and climate in 2023 are estimated to exceed 13.4 billion euros (around $14.3 billion).

Carlo Buontempo, Director of Copernicus, stated, “In 2023, hundreds of thousands of people will be affected by extreme weather events causing significant damage at a continental level, with an estimated cost of at least tens of billions of euros.” “It’s been done,” he said.

The report highlights that extreme weather conditions have led to heatwaves, wildfires, droughts, and floods. High temperatures are causing the reduction of glaciers on continents, including the Alps, where about 10% of glaciers have been lost over the past two years. Glacier ice has been declining.

Nevertheless, the authors of the report pointed out some exceptions, such as Scandinavia and Iceland, where temperatures were below average despite above-average mercury concentrations across much of the continent.

Source: www.nbcnews.com

The Role of Worms in Unraveling One of Science’s Greatest Mysteries: Challenging Established Models

Using the nematode C. elegans, scientists have made significant headway in understanding brain function. New insights into neural communication are provided by research that uses optogenetics and connectomics to challenge traditional models and deepen the understanding of complex neural networks. The transmission of information between neurons is currently being investigated, raising the question of whether we truly understand how the brain works.

There have been great strides in understanding the complex workings of the brain in recent decades, providing extensive knowledge about cellular neurobiology and neural networks. However, many important questions are still unanswered, leaving the brain as a profound and intriguing mystery. A team of neuroscientists and physicists at Princeton University has made groundbreaking strides in this field of research, particularly through their work with the C. elegans nematode. The study, recently published in Nature, is aimed at understanding how ensembles of neurons process information and generate behavior.

The C. elegans nematode is especially suitable for laboratory experimentation due to its simplicity and the fact that its brain wiring has been completely “mapped.” Furthermore, the worm’s transparency and light-sensitive tissues present the opportunity to use innovative techniques such as optogenetics. Through these techniques, the researchers were able to carefully observe and measure the flow of signals through the worm’s brain, gaining new insights that challenge established models of neural behavior.

The study provides a comprehensive explanation of how signals flow through the C. elegans brain and challenges established mathematical models derived from connectome maps. The researchers found that many of their empirical observations contradicted the predictions based on these models, leading them to identify “invisible molecular details” and “radio signals” as important components of neural behavior. Ultimately, this work aims to develop better models for understanding the complexity of the brain as a system.

The research was supported primarily by a National Institutes of Health Newcomer Award, a National Science Foundation CAREER Award, and the Simons Foundation. These findings have broad implications, particularly for understanding biological processes and developing new technologies.

Source: scitechdaily.com