Why Our Brain Won the 2025 Royal Society Trivedi Science Book Award

The human brain is one of the most intricate entities ever to exist.

Andriy Onofriyenko/Getty Images

Science literature, particularly those authored by scientists, is often perceived as monotonous and challenging. They are sometimes regarded as mere textbooks meant for structured learning. However, the book featuring the finalists for the Royal Society’s Trivite Science Award proves this perception wrong and showcases the judges’ selection for this year: Our Brains, Ourselves by neurologist Masd Hussain.

I was fortunate to serve as a panel chair among six dedicated readers and book enthusiasts, including New Scientist‘s Jacob Aron, who faced the daunting challenge of curating a list of nominees. Our discussions, led by passionate advocates for science, were diverse and engaging, reflecting the love we all share for both literature and science.

We frequently engaged in respectful debates, as I was usually in the company of individuals willing to consider opposing viewpoints. Our varied backgrounds and experiences enriched our understanding of the privileges associated with reading and the act of reading itself.

This year’s submissions featured numerous outstanding scientific works, yet Our Brains, Ourselves notably blended exquisite storytelling with rigorous, cutting-edge science, particularly evidenced in its humanistic approach. Hussain is a neuroscientist and a clinician; seven personal narratives from his patients are highlighted throughout the book.

The experiences shared are diverse. One individual feels an overwhelming apathy post-stroke, while another believes she has a connection with her husband. Each story illustrates profound transformations. This book is a poignant exploration of how neurological disorders can radically alter one’s identity and breed societal alienation.

A recurring theme in the book is the concept of “self” and how our brains shape our identities. It is conveyed empathetically and personally. The scientific elements are firmly grounded in Hussain’s own research, presented in an easily digestible manner, while acknowledging the unknowns. I appreciate this transparency; real science encourages the pursuit of further questions.

While case studies in clinical practices might seem commonplace, the unique personal touch here makes a significant difference. Have you ever felt a disconnect from personal attributes? The narratives of patients with brain disorders provoke thought regarding identity, selfhood, and our social roles.

This notion resonated strongly with our panel. What constitutes belonging? Some individuals encountered in the book are members of immigrant communities, facing prejudice and violence to carve out their place in society. It would seem that as our world becomes increasingly interconnected, our fear of differences should diminish—but this isn’t always the case.

Our Brains, Ourselves encourages readers to reflect on how neurological disorders can profoundly disrupt one’s sense of belonging while illustrating how cognitive function influences one’s identity. Ultimately, our brains substantially define who we are. This compassionate narrative not only educates readers about science but also showcases extraordinary human kindness.

Sandra Knapp is a plant taxonomist at the Museum of Natural History in London and chaired this year’s Royal Society Trivedi Science Book Award judging committee. The winner of the award is Our Brains, Ourselves, the latest addition to the New Scientist Book Club.

Topic:

Source: www.newscientist.com

Abu Dhabi Royal Family Places Their Bets on Us with Trump Agreement

The Abu Dhabi royal family plans to invest in TikTok’s US operations following Donald Trump’s signing of an executive order facilitating a deal valued at $14 billion (£10.5 billion).

MGX, a fund led by Sheikh Tahnoon Bin Zayed Al Nahyan, is set to acquire a 15% stake and representation on the board once TikTok US is spun out.

Late Thursday night, the US president signed an executive order that sanctioned the agreement and provided a 120-day period to finalize the details.

Larry Ellison’s Oracle, Private Equity Group Silver Lake, and Abu Dhabi’s MGX will together hold approximately 45% of TikTok’s shares. Overall, American firms are anticipated to control around 65% of the company, with Trump also mentioning tech moguls Michael Dell and Rupert Murdoch as participating investors.

According to Trump, “[TikTok US] will primarily be owned and governed by Americans, removing control from foreign adversaries. Notably, Larry Ellison, a major investor, will ensure that it operates seamlessly within the US.”

ByteDance, TikTok’s Chinese parent company, retains a 19.9% stake in the US operations.

While China has not publicly commented on the approval of the agreement, Trump stated he had a “productive conversation” with Chinese President Xi Jinping, who “seemed positive about the situation.”

US Vice President JD Vance confirmed that the TikTok deal is valued at $14 billion, noting some resistance from the Chinese side. “Our primary goal was to continue TikTok’s operations while safeguarding American data privacy in compliance with the law,” Vance remarked.

He further stated, “This agreement ensures that Americans can engage with TikTok, but with greater confidence than before, as their data will be secure and won’t be weaponized against them.”

Skip past newsletter promotions

The $14 billion valuation of TikTok’s US operations is significantly lower than its total valuation; which is estimated at around $330 billion. In comparison, Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, is valued at $1.8 trillion.

The future of TikTok in America has been uncertain since last April when Congress enacted legislation mandating a sale due to privacy and national security issues. Trump has consistently extended the deadline for concluding a sale or considering TikTok’s closure while attempting to facilitate the transaction.

Source: www.theguardian.com

The Royal Society Urges Elon Musk to Reflect on His Science Fellowship Resignation

The Royal Society suggested to Elon Musk that he might consider resigning from his fellowship if he believed it wouldn’t assist in addressing an attack on research from the Trump administration, according to the Guardian.

The owner of X, who is also the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, was elected as a member in 2018 due to the UK’s National Academy of Sciences’ contributions to the space and electric vehicle sectors.

However, in the past year, fellows and other scientists have informed the Royal Society that they feel the Academy has breached its code of conduct, leading some to resign, and the return of awards has become a point of contention amid protests against the Academy’s perceived inaction.

Among the various factors behind the protests was Musk’s position as the head of the U.S. Government Efficiency Office (DOGE), an agency criticized for reducing research funding and enforcing censorship within academia.

In March, the Guardian reported that the Royal Society decided that Musk would not be subject to an investigation regarding alleged violations of the Code. It was noted that Sir Paul Nurse, who is currently running for the presidency of the association, had advised Musk in May to think about resigning from his fellowship.

In an email sent to the Fellowship, Sir Adrian Smith, the current president of the Royal Society, disclosed that on March 19, he first communicated with Nurse about the “wide range of damages” inflicted on American science by the Trump administration and urged for “action to reverse this tragedy.”

Smith promptly responded, “highlighting his strong commitment to science and requesting further information regarding Paul’s concerns.”


Sir Paul Nurse, president of the Royal Society, expressed his concerns to Musk regarding American science. Photo: Paul Nurse

Nurse followed up with another letter on March 27, suggesting that Musk speak with U.S. public sector scientists to discuss the impact of the administration’s policies.

“Paul did not receive any responses to this communication or the follow-up reminders,” Smith stated.

On May 20, the nurse sent a letter outlining concerns shared with him by U.S. scientists, noting that “some of the proposed budget cuts seemed pointless.”

Smith mentioned: “In his letter of distress, Paul suggested, ‘If you feel you can’t help, you should consider whether you truly wish to remain a Fellow of the Royal Society.’

Nevertheless, Musk only replied after Smith and Nurse indicated that the contents of their correspondence would be shared with the fellowship.


A spokesperson for the Academy confirmed that Musk has not made any comments regarding proposals to consider resigning from his fellowship, stating, “Elon Musk remains a Fellow of the Royal Society.”

In an email to Smith’s fellowship, it was noted: “The society’s officers and council determined that pursuing disciplinary action against Musk does not align with the Royal Society’s interests.” Although significant disagreements were expressed during previous fellowship meetings, Smith acknowledged that defending science globally remains the society’s foremost objective.

Not all peers advocate for condemning Musk, with some expressing concerns about potentially questioning the views of others who have shared controversial opinions. However, one fellow familiar with Smith’s email described the situation as “a significant issue.”

Another fellow noted that the leadership approach seems to prioritize pragmatism over ethical considerations. “If a new party emerges around Musk, it could lead to significant repercussions, including potential repercussions for Royal Society archives from that period,” they commented.

Stephen Curry, a professor emeritus of structural biology at Imperial College London and a previous organizer of open letters, supported the correspondence but stressed that the academy should take a more resolute and explicit stance.

“They haven’t received any indications from Elon Musk that he aligns with the Royal Society’s declared values, so it should be made clear to him that without this commitment, his fellowship must end,” he stated.

“I am increasingly concerned that the Royal Society is unable to uphold its own code of conduct.”

A representative for Musk was requested for comment.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Archaeologists suggest that wine drinking in ancient Troy was enjoyed by more than just the royal elite

Since it was discovered during the excavation of Heinrich Schlimann in the legendary fortress city of Troy, Depas Amphikypellon – The cylindrical goblet with two curved handles, considered to be the goblet mentioned in Homer’s epic, is considered a potential drinking container for wine. New research by archaeologists at the University of Tübingen, Bonn and Jena University confirms this hypothesis by identifying high concentrations of fruit acids that exhibit regular use exclusively for wine, but these same acids were also found in Troy cups and beakers. This raises questions about the social and cultural significance of beverages. Although previously recognized as the exclusive coat of arms of the early Bronze Age, wine consumption may have been more widespread than previously assumed.

Height 15 cm Depas Amphikypellon It was excavated by Heinrich Schlimann of Troy. Image credit: Valentin Marcard / University of Tübingen.

Hefaestus spoke, then rose to his feet and handed the double goblet to his beloved mother.” says the first book iliadtells us how fire gods, metalworking and volcanoes encourage mothers.

As he spoke, the white goddess Hera smiled. She reached for her son’s goblet.

He pulled out the sweet nectar from the mixing bowl, right to left to left for all the other gods.

This drinking container Depas Amphikypellonwell known to archaeologists.

The object is a thin clay goblet with two handles narrowed to a pointed base.

Over 100 ships have been previously discovered in Troy from 2500 to 2000 BC.

They are also scattered from the Aegean Sea to Asia and Mesopotamia, and can hold between 0.25 and 1 liter.

“Heinrich Schlimann has already speculated that Depas’ goblet was handed over to celebrate. iliadsaid Dr. Stephen Blum, an archaeologist at the University of Tubingen.

“The classic archaeological collection at the University of Tübingen has two fragments and depas goblets from the Schliman terrorist attack.”

In the new study, researchers heated 2 grams of samples from two fragments and studied the resulting mixture using Gas Chromatography (GC) and mass spectrometry (GC-MS).

“The evidence for succinic acid and pyruvate was conclusive. It only occurs when grape juices ferment,” said Dr. Maxim Reigeot, a researcher at the University of Bonn.

“So now we can confidently state that the wine is actually drunk not only from grape juice but also from DePas’ goblet.”

Wine was the most expensive drink of the Bronze Age, and DePas’ goblets were the most precious ship. DePas’ goblets have been found in a temple and palace complex.

Therefore, scientists speculated that wine drinking took place on special occasions in elite circles.

But did the lower classes of Troy drink wine as everyday food and luxury?

“We also studied ordinary cups where chemicals were found in the outer settlements of Troy.

“So it’s clear that wine was a daily drink for the public as well.”

Team’s paper It was published in American Journal of Archeology.

____

Stephen We are Bram et al. 2025. Wine consumption problems in Troy in the early Bronze Age: organic residue analysis and Depas Amphikypellon. American Journal of Archeology 129(2); doi:10.1086/734061

Source: www.sci.news

Calls for Royal Society to Expel Elon Musk Due to Behavior Concerns

The Royal Society is facing pressure to remove technology mogul Elon Musk from its membership due to concerns about his behavior.

As reported by The Guardian, Musk, known for owning the social media platform X, was elected to the British Academy of Sciences in 2018. Some view him as a contemporary innovator comparable to Brunel for his contributions to the aerospace and electric vehicle sectors.

Musk, a co-founder of SpaceX and the CEO of Tesla, has been commended for advancing reusable rocket technology and promoting sustainable energy sources.

Nevertheless, concerns have been raised by several Royal Society fellows regarding Musk’s membership status, citing his provocative comments, particularly following recent riots in the UK.

Critics fear that Musk’s statements could tarnish the reputation of his companies. In response to inquiries, Musk’s companies, including X, provided comments.

Musk’s social media posts during the unrest were widely condemned, with Downing Street rebuking his remarks about civil war and false claims about UK authorities.

The concerns around potentially revoking Musk’s membership focus on his ability to promote his beliefs responsibly and not on his personal views.

The Royal Society’s Code of Conduct emphasizes that fellowship entails upholding certain standards of behavior, even in personal communications, to safeguard the organization’s reputation.

Skip Newsletter Promotions

The Code stipulates that breaching conduct rules may result in disciplinary measures, such as temporary or permanent suspension. Specific procedures are outlined if misconduct allegations are raised against a Fellow or Foreign Member.

Expelling a member from the Royal Society is rare, with no records of such action in over a century. Previous controversies included a dean resigning over remarks about teaching creationism in schools.

A Royal Society spokesperson assured that any concerns regarding individual Fellows would be handled confidentially.

Source: www.theguardian.com

Top 10 Stunning Images from the Royal Society Publications Photography Competition

Ever wanted to visit another world? Mars, one of our closest celestial neighbors, is an astonishing 225 million kilometers from Earth, a distance that would take over 1,000 years to walk.

But guess what? Many things on Earth look exactly like Mars; that’s what this year’s winner of the Royal Society Publishing Photography Competition proved. Although this photo looks like a snapshot of an extraterrestrial plant, it actually shows a group of Smile mold growing in a lush garden in the UK.

But the other pictures in the collection are equally amazing. From a crystal forest to a temporary rift and jellyfish elevator, the images capture strange scientific phenomena.

Ecology Category Runner-Up – Postwar Chamois

The image shows an Alps chamois (Lupikapra Lupikapra) Licking the walls of a World War II air raid shelter in the mountains of Val Valaita in the Western Alps. Photo credit: Filippo Calgati

Micro-imaging category runner-up – Crystal lighthouse in the wild forest

The image shows microcrystals of beta-alanine and L-glutamine, showing the evolution of the crystal pattern during the crystallization process. Photo credit: Shyam Ulhas

Astronomy Category Winner – Western Veil Nebula

The Veil Nebula, a spectacular supernova remnant, discovered in the constellation Cygnus, about 10,000 to 20,000 years ago, has gained attention. The horn of the nebula in our sky is several times the size of the Moon. Photo provided by Imran Sultan

Overall Winner – Mars Landscape

The photo shows a specimen lamproderma scintillance, a microorganism that grows on the autumn leaves of Somerset, England. The slime mold exhibits a range of hues, from earthy browns to glossy bronzes to steel-blue iridescent hues of the surrounding deciduous trees. Photo credit: Irina Petrova Adamatsky

Read more:

Source: www.sciencefocus.com